jawa.mee.nu

March 26, 2007

What's in Your Sandwich?

Internet anus Michael Crook (Forsake the Troops) is having turds today.

Read the whole story about Crook's humiliation at 10 Zen Monkeys.

Posted by: Bluto at 09:16 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.

March 17, 2007

al-Gore's Zinc Mine

How many carbon offsets does it take to cover a strip mine?

Posted by: Howie at 07:10 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.

March 15, 2007

Tokyo Rosie The "Truther"

Not content with the outrage over her defense of the murdering fat bastard Khalid the Sheep Humping Sheik Mohammed, Rosie ~~ran~~ waddled home, discovered Google and started posting about WTC #7.

Barbara, Darling, you need to dump Rosie. Because to her, everything is a Kihnspiracy!

Seriously, break it off Barbara, you deserve better.

The only part of KSM's confession she believes is that he was abused. Which is not true. Never mind he confessed(bragged) before he was captured. No sense arguing with her. You can't cure stupid.

I'll file this under Genital Puppets, for obvious reasons.

Hat Tip: Ghost of a Flea. more...

Posted by: Howie at 07:03 PM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.

1 rosie should be forced to listen to this for 1 whole day as punishment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr317Cze3nE

Posted by: Jesusland carlos at March 15, 2007 08:44 PM (AeRA2)

2 Uff-da, stupidity can be cured. Ask a coroner.

Posted by: Skul at March 15, 2007 09:08 PM (MQ3sn)

3 Rosie Rosie, decomposie! How does your garden grow? With
leftist shills, and taco thrills, and petty lies tossed to and fro!
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 15, 2007 09:17 PM (2OHpj)

4 Hey, that was good Mike, way better than Tokyo Rosie's poems. With punctuation and everything! Tell me, how much to teach Rosie that? Do you think it's even possible?

Posted by: Darth Odie at March 15, 2007 09:25 PM (YHZAl)

5 I don't think it's possible. It's kind of in the catagory of time travel.
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 15, 2007 09:41 PM (2OHpj)

6 Rosie posie pudding and pie, jerked off in her girlfriend's eye, when her eye was dry and shut, Rosie fucked that one eyed slut.

Posted by: Vinnie at March 16, 2007 12:32 AM (fdAim)

7 OOOHH! Thats gonna leave a mark! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 16, 2007 12:39 AM (2OHpj)

8 My video response to Hanoi Rosie is here:
http://www.globaldefensegroup.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=483&Itemid=85

Posted by: Kafir at March 16, 2007 01:37 AM (HsmTD)

9 Kafir, no offense, but I didn't watch your vid. I'm sure it crushes Rosies' delusional reality, but I am pretty tired of looking at death. Its a case of overload, and I hope you will forgive me. I did save the link for later. Great to see someone shooting back at her.
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 16, 2007 05:54 AM (2OHpj)

10 Rosie you ignorant slut, WTC 7 fell down because it had a 110 story building fall on top of it. The reason the building looked undamaged was because almost all the photos and video of the building were taken of the side that faced away from WTC 1&2. The few pictures that were taken of the opposite side of the building show heavy damage and massive amounts of smoke from the fire.

Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at March 16, 2007 07:33 AM (oC8nQ)

11 Well done Kafir.

Posted by: Howie at March 16, 2007 08:33 AM (YHZAl)

12 Lead has been a tried and true method for curing stupid for quite some time now. Especially if it's fast moving lead.

Posted by: memphis761 at March 16, 2007 08:35 AM (YHZAl)

13 I wonder if Rosie consulted her, "Internet friend mike, who a lot of people don't like." But she thinks is a nice guy before she went on The Spew yesterday. She admits to being this jerk's friend and agreeing with him.

Posted by: Howie at March 16, 2007 08:45 AM (YHZAl)

Said the odonnelphant to the rooster, why the looks of being so blue? I have no one to call my own ,said he, and my days of romance are nearly through. Take heart and lower your standards, old bird and in the morn you'll see life anew, so the rooster crowed out to darkness that night, "any cock will do".

How'd your evening go last night ? the carpet munching odonnelphant later inquired, Not so well, in fact it was hell as only chet atkins had replied. Homophobic fowel! Intolerant Banta! You deserve not to be able to breed! And she took a roll of fat that she wore like a hat, and dropped it over, spilling out feed. My goodness your aromas... said the rooster, I've never quite smelled anything like that before, in all my barn yard years of sun baked manures, not even the wild boars.

Are you all talk or have you any action left? rosie said with an uplifted uni brow. And so the rooster had a go at it, then the pig, the horse and the cow. Can none of you satisfy me? She shrieked from beneath the livery pile, I've had each and everyone of you and still no twinkie for my wile. Since I can get no pleasure and no one can measure the depravity that I seek, I will have my revenge, binge after binge, on a morning talk show 5 days a week, and she drooled a most unhealthy bile.

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 09:13 AM (tclwJ)

15 Thanks Howie.
I'm still very new to video editing, and I'm doing it in an application that is not very high-end, but I'm hoping to eventually match or surpass the quality of propaganda videos coming from the other side.

Michael Weaver - no problem. I understand completely.
I have a very hard time with the beheading videos, and it was Nick Berg's beheading that was the impetus for starting Global Defense Group.

I usually refuse to watch beheading videos (even on the rare occasion when I post them to my website), but I put my own squeamishness aside for the sole purpose of showing the sort of animal Rosie was defending.

There really are no words that can do justice to the evil of KSM, or al-Qaeda, and the truth must be seen to be believed.
Having said that, the clip I inserted consists of 4 seconds of gore, bracketed by 4 minutes of loud, fat, Rosie stupidity, and intersperesed with titles illustrating that stupidity.

There ya go. Now you don't need to watch it.

Posted by: Kafir at March 16, 2007 12:16 PM (HsmTD)

16 Kafir, I will see it eventually , as long as the link is good. I had my worst trouble trying to study the Qana pics that sick ghoul was posing for the cameras. I wonder where the ghoul really found his sad little props. No question he was waving around dead children like little flags. I actually wonder how they really died, because they are so perfect. But we only find the pics of butchered Israeli kids if we go looking for them. They are if possble, even worse, because of the blood, and missing body parts. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 16, 2007 05:44 PM (2OHpj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 13, 2007

Al Gore's Retirement Plan

Ever wonder who gets the money when Al Gore buys a "carbon offset" to balance the enormous energy consumption of his household? Al Gore gets the money.

Signal 94 explains it all.

Posted by: Bluto at 03:17 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.

The Video al-Gore Doesn't Want You To See.

According to a group of scientists brought together by documentary-maker Martin Durkin, if the planet is heating up, it isn't your fault ... all Â» and there's nothing you can do about it.
Google Video: Channel 4 Documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle

Posted by: Howie at 10:07 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Watch it, ya Leftard sheeples. The FACTS presented here make a total charlatan out of Al Gore. You're being had.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2007 12:28 PM (8e/V4)

2 Channel 4, not BBC. But still the best documentary I have seen in years.

Posted by: Martin at March 13, 2007 01:18 PM (T5XyM)

3 Ok I fixed the post but I did not do the google vid.

Posted by: Howie at March 13, 2007 03:02 PM (YHZAl)

4 This proves this whole global warming is a lie and a hoax it has little to do with saving the enviroment and more in controling our lives and creating a world goverment run by the evil UN and about a new age pagan religion WORSHIP OF THE EARTH

Posted by: sandpiper at March 13, 2007 03:33 PM (1mdPR)

5 Yeah but now that they've shown business how this farce can be maDe profitable. it may be unstoppable. They will develop this and that, it will be expensive. Then you will get a bill for all these new gadgets. Business will pass the cost on as always. They will make more money because of course they will charge you more than it costs to develop and run the new tech. They will want a return on the investment. Only this is an investment on nothing much really. Carbon offsets. Where you give a starving person from the 3rd world a bowl of rice ( you skimmed all the money you could get taking it to him). To not buy a tractor or plant his own fields right. See how the liberal economy works? On the backs of the poor. Here there and everywhere. Then they tell the poor how they help them. Because they consider them their pets and themselves the masters.

Posted by: Howie at March 13, 2007 03:52 PM (YHZAl)

Scientific consensus. Bullshit. Consensus is for politicians, science is as Karl Popper has enunciated about falsification. The theory that global warming is due to humans is quite clearly falsified.

As the program clearly states, it has become a bandwagon that will stifle advances in both the developed and developing world. We clearly need to develop new sources of energy because current sources are finite, however that doesnâ€™t mean not using the resources currently available to us.

Posted by: Sophoclese at March 13, 2007 04:31 PM (NIrSR)

7 This documentary ties together all the stuff I've been collecting, I'm SO HAPPY! My own files are a mess, but I've been on this and hoping I could organize my stuff into something understandable someday, and YAAAHH! Someone finally already did it! This rocks! Thankyou thankyou thankyou! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 13, 2007 06:00 PM (2OHpj)

8 Where the hell is OsamabinHiding (snicker)? USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 14, 2007 02:11 AM (2OHpj)

9 Hey Michael...

Been working so much that I haven't had time to check in. I hope all is well. I'll be back soon.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at March 20, 2007 10:17 AM (W7sIg)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

NYT: is 'Inconvenient Truth' Alarmist?

Well, duh. A movie made by a politician and designed to build his base by conferring heretic status on anyone who disagrees with him just might be a bit...overstated.

The New York Times writes:

But part of his scientific audience is uneasy. In talks, articles and blog entries that have appeared since his film and accompanying book came out last year, these scientists argue that some of Mr. Goreâ€™s central points are exaggerated and erroneous. They are alarmed, some say, at what they call his alarmism.
â€œI donâ€™t want to pick on Al Gore,â€ Don J. Easterbrook, an emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University, told hundreds of experts at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America. â€œBut there are a lot of inaccuracies in the statements we are seeing, and we have to temper that with real data.â€

more...

Posted by: Bluto at 09:13 AM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 264 words, total size 2 kb.

March 07, 2007

Iraqi national detained at LAX with unusual item in his "bum"

From Doug Hagmann, Director of the Northeast Intelligence Network:

6 March 2007: TSA officials at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) detained a 35 year-old Iraqi national at about 5:40 this morning after he set off an alarm at the passenger screening area at terminal 1. Security officers searched Fadhel Abbas al-Maliki of South Ocean Avenue in Atlantic City, New Jersey, finding wires on his body and what was described as a magnet concealed in his rectum. Al Mailki also was in possession of another, unidentified metal device which is currently being assessed and evaluated by law enforcement authorities. Fadhel al-Maliki intended to board a US Airways flight from Los Angeles to Philadelphia. Although al-Maliki was detained at the terminal, his luggage remained on the aircraft, which made an unscheduled landing in Las Vegas for a security screening.

In a radio interview with WIBG, Mr. Hagmann reveals a bit more information regarding this event and the suspect in custody.

UPDATE by Rusty: I must have gotten a 100 e-mails about this. Look, isn't a vibrator just a small unbalanced electro-magnet? And if so, what's so unusual about a guy at LAX with one in his rectum?

Posted by: Kafir at 02:41 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.

March 03, 2007

NEWSFLASH - Bill Clinton Doesn't Support an Attack on Iran!

According to the Associated Press:

Former President Bill Clinton said Friday sanctions against Iran were working better than people think and questioned whether a military strike would work to end its nuclear program. He argued that two-thirds of Iran's population wants a moderate government and that sanctions could have some influence on the nation's powerful clerics.

"We may not have to go to war, and we may not have a disaster," he told about 9,000 gathered at Kansas State University. "You need to talk to everybody before you bomb them. In other words, if you're going to fight with somebody - I don't care what you don't have in common - you should talk first."

Slick Willy has a point. I mean, look how successful the sanctions against Iraq were. One can expect similar success in this instance, when imposed and supervised by the 'usual suspects' at the United Nations. more...

Posted by: Kafir at 11:14 AM | Comments (25) | Add Comment
Post contains 405 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Some people just seem to be a bit too eager to send our Armed Forces off to war.

Posted by: JOHN RYAN at March 03, 2007 12:38 PM (TcoRJ)

2 Slick Willy is so full of it.

As an Iranian I have three things to say:
a) Airstrikes against the main props of the regime will enable citizens to overthrow the regime including its terrorist nuclear ambitions.
b) Sanctions work on governments that actually care about their populations. Whereas with the Mullahcracy it's in fact quite the opposite, their objective being to sacrifice the property the dignity and the lives of individual Iranians on the Arab and his f**king religion.

c) Slick Willy, Jimmy Carter, Hilary Clinton and their ilk along with Muslims and Islam can go collectively f**k themselves.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 03, 2007 12:39 PM (EdIIN)

3 Hey "John Ryan" Qolam-Ali Tazi

And some people like you are afraid of losing their paymasters in Tehran.

That's right you worthless Arab-worshipping Muslim f**k; be afraid. Be very afraid!

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 03, 2007 12:44 PM (EdIIN)

4 "You need to talk to everybody before you bomb them. In other words, if
you're going to fight with somebody - I don't care what you don't have
in common - you should talk first."

That is the all time best quote I have ever read from old Bill...and by best I mean completely fucking stupid.

Some people just seem to be a bit too eager to send our Armed Forces off to war.

And other people seem so ready to give in to any terroristic demand in the best Dhimmi fashion....and by best I mean completely in the sense of being completely devoid of testicles.

Posted by: Randman at March 03, 2007 12:50 PM (Sal3J)

5 John Ryan:

Our armed forces exist to protect the American people.
They are funded by the American people, and they are an entirely volunteer force made up of American people.
No sane person is "eager" for war, but to eliminate the possibility of preemptive military action only emboldens an enemy, as history has repeatedly shown.

The men and women of our armed forces knew what they were doing when they signed up. They have trained for this and they know what they are fighting for.
While anti-war crowd is over here pretending to support our troops (and simultaneously undermining their mission), they are re-enlisting in record numbers.

I've got several military friends who are (or were) in Iraq and Afghanistan. I don't know if you've ever asked them what THEY want, but I have...
They don't want your protection, they want your support. They believe in their mission and they want to be left alone to do it.

They are not war mongers, any more than I, but they understand something that you apparently do not... we are fighting for our survival, and our enemy seeks nothing less than our complete annihilation.

Posted by: Kafir at March 03, 2007 01:04 PM (HsmTD)

6 Garduneh Mehr the Canadian who wants Americans to go to war to do what Garduneh Mehr does not have the balls to do...

Posted by: Ragnardo Di Canneskjold at March 03, 2007 02:01 PM (b0FZu)

7 Rangardo DI whatever the hell your name is,

First, if the U.S. takes on the Mullahs I'd volunteer to serve alongside U.S. servicemen as an interpretter because I'm too old to be useful as a soldier.

Second, unlike dirtbags such as yourself I don't presume to tell Americans what they should do. I have complete faith that America can and will act in the defence of its citizens and its friends as it always has.

Third, with or without American help the Islamic Republic is NOT long for this world.

Fourth, you and other Pinko's can join Muslims and the Clintons in going to hell even if you're already there.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 03, 2007 02:28 PM (EdIIN)

8 How much talking did he do before he bombed an aspirin factory in Sudan? Presidents have been making the same mistake for decades -- namely "listening to the C.I.A"

Posted by: davec at March 03, 2007 02:40 PM (9DUEl)

9 HEY, DONâ€™T FORGET ABOUT CONTAINMENT!
For you horribly disabled non-statisticians out there, here is a key fact: If all countries were placed on a bell-curve of nastiness, most would clump in the middle, with Iran North Korea, and a few others, on the tail, as the most nasty. Over time, a powerful phenomenon called â€œregression towards the meanâ€ occurs, and they tend to drift back toward the average, or mean. All else being equal, random events conspire to create â€œaverage nastinessâ€. Tyrants lose power, or they run out of the money they need to do bad things, they get assassinated, their people rise up, etc. Honestly, this really happens. Examples: Nicaragua, ALL of South America (compared to 1965), Panama, Libya, and of course, the Soviet Union (remember them?). Ergo, if the democracies simply CONTAIN Iran, it will likely improve over time, on its own. Condi recently pointed out that Iranâ€™s economy is fragile (still much weaker than 1979), people are getting very tired of poverty, the isolation, and their obviously emotionally disturbed president. Hate is also very disabling to Iran. Many people in the Middle East cling to hate as an addiction, passing it on to their children, cherishing it inside themselves, using it as the centerpiece of their lives. For Iran, hate is an enormous waste of time and energy. FINALLY, we probably have time on the nuclear issue. There are only two ways to make nuclear weapons, Plutonium - 238, or enriched uranium. Key points: (1) North Korea has no usable weapons; their "fizzle" shot occurred because they only have REACTOR grade plutonium (80% pure or less), which can only be refined to weapons grade at enormous cost, and they don't have significant usable enriched uranium; (2) Most Russian nukes are mothballed and have degraded to an unusable state, and (3) Iran has no idea what they're doing. Contrary to web chit-chat, building reliable, weapons-usable and deliverable nuclear weapons is very hard, and Iran would only get one shot at an attack. Russia has never perfected stable, reliable weapons where you could just push a button and get a reliable bomb blast of a certain size in a certain exact place on the other side of the world. (Remember these people are still driving Ladaâ€™s.) Given these facts, are these Iranian fanatics (who could not even build a Lada without help), a clear and present danger to the US? Russia seems to be playing Iran along to take their money. Iran apparently tried for a North Korean nuke, but now realize that huge, ship-sized nukes that only fizzle are useless. They probably planned to hit a coastal city, like Tel Aviv. Right now, we (democracies) just have to keep up the pressure, and focus on containment If the democracies have to bomb Iran as a kind of last-minute thing, we will. Astonishingly, even liberals will support war if the enemy is at the gates.

Posted by: DemocracyRules at March 03, 2007 03:26 PM (L/SIz)

10 "Ergo, if the democracies simply CONTAIN Iran, it will likely improve over time, on its own."

Nice hypothesis, but it fails to take into account some salient points:

1. In the years since the revolution, there has been no sign of improvement in Iran... quite the opposite.

2. The Politburo and the Ayatollahs have vastly different ideological makeup. While the Communists wanted power, wealth and dominance, the Ayatollahs desire a biblical apocalypse.
The factors that prevented the soviets from initiating a nuclear war do not exist when dealing with 'radical Islam'.

3. Given points one and two, even assuming your hypothesis is correct, we may not have the luxury of waiting for a nuclear armed Iran to catch up to your bell curve.

Posted by: Kafir at March 03, 2007 08:59 PM (HsmTD)

11 I know a whole lot of Persians in SoCal who would give up their BMWs and enlist in the US military (either translating or combat), if only they knew we had a commander in chief with the balls to wipe out the mullahs. Unfortunately, the Iranian people (both good and bad) are smart enough to know that the US gov't is hampered by a shortage of balls - they saw what happened to the uprising in Iraq following the first gulf war.

Posted by: wooga at March 03, 2007 09:09 PM (2YapR)

12 IdiocracyRules:

Containment has worked wonders against Iran so far. 30 years of uninterupted terrorism and war against America.

It would make more sense to talk to a syphilis spyrochete.

Something you probably do evey time you apply creme to your sores.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at March 04, 2007 01:56 AM (Dt3sl)

13 I wonder if he gave poor little monica any talking to or warning before bombing her blue dress.

Posted by: wb at March 04, 2007 04:20 PM (GRjob)

14 Yet he was willing to order the attack there in SAMOLIA to draw attention way from his own shady afairs

Posted by: sandpiper at March 04, 2007 08:00 PM (vnSBY)

15 Aw, look at everyone still attacking slick willy after all these years. Better than focusing on the current CHIMP/POTUS.

Posted by: osamabinthere at March 05, 2007 03:43 AM (ZxuJ4)

16 It's not so much an attack as a re validation for the extreme disaproval of a person who brought a great deal of dishonor and shame to the Presidency. Now before you go off on attacking by comparing, let's just stick to the subject at hand. That's going to keep things in perspective. And from where many sit, the view of the clintons is pretty poor. It gets even worse eveytime they open their pie holes. As the mistakes made unfold, it's chess not checkers you know in policy, history will be the judge. One thing that is not in question is intergrity matters, no one is above the law and one is either a politician or a leader. The latter usually spends his terms trying to straighten out what the former did. That is the place at which we find ourselves now.

Posted by: wb at March 05, 2007 11:00 AM (4DPNw)

17 osamabinthere -

If he'd shut the hell up and go away, we wouldn't have new cause to refute his most current idiocy... and the 'attacks' (which are really responses) would cease.

Posted by: Kafir at March 05, 2007 02:42 PM (HsmTD)

18 osamaisawigger: It's called having the class to wait until he is out of office before shouting his faults thereby not helping the enemy by showing our lack of solidarity. But class is something you wouldn't understand. Lefturds never do.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 05, 2007 08:22 PM (criip)

19 Class? You mean cowardice not to call bullshit when you see it. Rooster, If you like Bush that's fine. It doesn't mean I have to. He is not immune to criticism. I doubt you held your tongue much about Clinton during his 8 years, right? I would hope not. All presidents make stupid (rather large) mistakes and should be called on it.

Posted by: osamabinthere at March 06, 2007 02:34 AM (ZxuJ4)

20 Yuuuup..... no shortage of material in that department with any administration. It just seems that there is more of an attck on the office itself this time around. That spells trouble. t r u b u l....trouble.
You'll have to provide the other .98 cents here as I only have .2 ....

This President is doing what he believes to be right in the long run, not for a popularity contest. We have always had great leaders tested in that way, some passed and some acted like contestants on American idol. You're a better thoughtful poster than you are a Don Rickles. You've just got to accept.... no.... learn to tolerate without accepting ( paying attention Professor? I'm trying here ....that's a whole thesis unto itself...) others may react poorly to a thought that doesn't fall into line. It's also worth noting given the situation we're in right now how tit for tat can just keep going for the sake of itself.

Just a thought and now.... back to the gutter!

Posted by: wb at March 06, 2007 09:25 AM (dFKOS)

21 yup trubble.... that's .02

Posted by: wb at March 06, 2007 09:26 AM (dFKOS)

22 Osamaisawigger: Wrong asshole. I kept my mouth shut about everything except his defiling the oval office with the fat bitch and lying to us on television. You wouldn't know what patriotism is. I place the good of this nation before my individual agenda. You lefturds don't.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 07, 2007 08:37 AM (wTIrf)

23 Ah, Gayrooster...so you ever get tired of spewing the same lies? I guess in your book a Patriot is a pussy who can't call bullshit on King George. Fuck that. A proud American stands up to bullshit, regardless of who is in office. Bubba Clinton's pearl necklace is NOTHING compared to the bungling of CHIMP. Why don't you focus on Clinton's errors of leadership instead of obsessing about him making one of your pigs squeal.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at March 08, 2007 08:21 PM (ZxuJ4)

24 Islam delenda est.

Posted by: Macker at March 16, 2007 07:13 AM (tzcUt)

25 blah

Posted by: gaby at May 24, 2007 07:12 PM (C9idh)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 02, 2007

Finally, Science Catches Up to Hollywood

Remember the Orgasmatron from the Woody Allen film "Sleeper?"

At last, Science has developed its own version.

Thanks to Cookie at The Cook Shack--Gab & Grub, who has an unpleasant NSFW photo lurking under the polar bears, the dogs, and the priest in the post below the orgasmatron one. It's not the car, sweety.

Posted by: Bluto at 01:13 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.

February 27, 2007

Another Inconvenient Truth

Al Gore's household energy consumption:

Back home in Tennessee, safely ensconced in his suburban Nashville home, Vice President Al Gore is no doubt basking in the Oscar awarded to "An Inconvenient Truth," the documentary he inspired and in which he starred. But a local free-market think tank is trying to make that very home emblematic of what it deems Gore's environmental hypocrisy.
Armed with Gore's utility bills for the last two years, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research charged Monday that the gas and electric bills for the former vice president's 20-room home and pool house devoured nearly 221,000 kilowatt-hours in 2006, more than 20 times the national average of 10,656 kilowatt-hours.
"If this were any other person with $30,000-a-year in utility bills, I wouldn't care," says the Center's 27-year-old president, Drew Johnson. "But he tells other people how to live and he's not following his own rules."

I'm sure the former Veep offsets his family's blatant greedy piggishness with a healthy contribution to terraspass, or perhaps he'll sign up for my own alternative Green program.

Posted by: Bluto at 11:18 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I'm still amazed by the number of tards who buy into his line of crap.

Posted by: Dick at February 27, 2007 12:43 PM (XlQVK)

2 I've been wondering what the environmentalist equivalent of the 'chicken hawk' slur might be.

Calling someone a "neon green" seems to fit, but doesn't sound so insulting or derogatory. What about "puke green," referring to their green words but lavish lifestyle (puke = opulence, self-gratification, and over indulgence)?

"If you want us to conserve energy, why don't YOU drive a hybrid? Or are you just a 'neon green,' sending the children of the poor to toil under the low light of energy saving bulbs and to risk their lives driving unsafe compact cars, while you and your rich buddies drive your SUVs and..."

Wow, that's a really lame argument (just like 'chickenhawk'). But I'm sure someone can come up with something better.

Posted by: wooga at February 27, 2007 02:27 PM (t9sT5)

3 George W Bush has a smaller carbon footprint than Gore does. Fact.

â€œThe Bush family has installed a 25,000- gallon
rainwater cistern for irrigation and planted native plants.
The President is also busy removing invasive trees. The familyâ€™s
geothermal heating and cooling system sends water 300 feet
into the ground to keep it at a constant 67 degree. The system
uses 75 percent less electricity than traditional heating
and air-conditioning systems, and it heats the outdoor pool
so efficiently that the Bushes shelved their plans to install
solar panels,â€ he said. The Bush ranch also features
passive solar heating and cooling, daylighting and enhanced
insulation."

http://www.solartoday.org/2003/may_june03/solar_wh.htm

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 27, 2007 02:36 PM (ETghS)

4 Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth'? -- $30,000 utility bill
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=nation_world&id=5072659

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 27, 2007 03:05 PM (ETghS)

5 Algore mansion uses 20x energy of average American home:

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 27, 2007 03:07 PM (ETghS)

6 wooga .... Try "Chicken littles". I've seen it on other threads, and it works for me. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 27, 2007 05:23 PM (2OHpj)

7 Michael,
"Chicken little" covers the paranoia and screaming issues, but doesn't hit on the hypocrisy. For a moral relativist, there is no sin other than hypocrisy. For the moral relativist segment of the environmentalists, the 'chicken little' label doesn't sting.

Posted by: wooga at February 27, 2007 08:43 PM (t9sT5)

8 In the origional tale, all of chicken littles followers get eaten by foxy loxy! Seems approrpiate to me, but I'll think about it and see if I can't win a prize. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 28, 2007 05:36 AM (2OHpj)

9 Call them ICE-BORG!

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 28, 2007 05:37 AM (2OHpj)

We should have a thread dedicated to finding a term that fits these idiot alarmists. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 28, 2007 05:39 AM (2OHpj)

11 AL GORE is no different that the rest of the enviroemental hypotcrits he has that fancy home and it dont run by solar power he has no hybrid cars in his garage and none of his private planes are powered by rubberbands and think of how much jet fuel he burns up while flying all over the world shooting off his big mouth and producing all that HOT AIR

Posted by: sandpiper at February 28, 2007 10:52 AM (4pkrX)

12 The utility company says it didn't give Gore's billing information to anyone so where did they get it? Did anyone verify it to see if it's accurate? Did anyone ask Gore for his billing records to confirm the numbers?

The right wing hate machine knows one thing and they know it with absolute certainty - conservatives never require proof. All they require is opinion that conforms to their beliefs. That opinion can (and usually does) consist of nothing more than lies and half-truths but that's good enough for conservatives.

Just a few short months ago Exxon said global warming was a farce. Today, Exxon says it's real. Even the company that financed all the fake science trying to disprove global warming now admits it was lying its butt off.

Yet, the faithful still believe they are right. Based on what fact? They don't require facts. They're told to hate Al Gore and they dutifully obey. And now they have a new set of fake facts to back them up.

Anyone see any WMD lately? It's the same baseless crap and you guys fall for it every time.

Posted by: zzpat at February 28, 2007 04:02 PM (zbHRv)

13 Ooh good one zzpat! I really liked the way you tried to divert
attention from your hypocrisy by bringing up WMD's, which simply
smashes any possibility of anyone refuting you because you didn't say
anything. That pretty much makes you not only a hypocrite, but also a
coward and a liar, because if you had a real, valid argument, you'd use
it, and not hide behind a strawman, but then, you're a lefturd, and
it's to be expected. I hope we can meet someday soon.

Posted by: Improbulus Akhbar at February 28, 2007 09:52 PM (eGb9y)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

February 22, 2007

Tagged, Bluto Confidential

Having been "tagged" by Cookie at The Cookshack Gab & Grub to reveal six unknown and unusual things about myself, I've decided to spread the ~~misery~~ joy to some of my Jawa Report co-bloggers, listed at the end. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 01:29 PM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 285 words, total size 2 kb.

1 What exactly is this "tagging" thing? Some kind of game?

Posted by: Wearyman at February 22, 2007 02:47 PM (puky3)

2 Jaysus

1- I luvs seafood and massages, though not necessarily at the same time. Well actually that might be nice.
2- My great great great grandfather lost half a leg in the Civil War.
3- My husband is an ironworker in NYC and is building the Freedom Tower.
4- I have green eyes.
5- George Bush named my blog, kinda.
6- Frequently I cruise around, going no where, with the radio blasting, blasting.

arrrrrrr.

Posted by: jane at February 22, 2007 03:03 PM (wZLWV)

3 Hey I earned a New York State Regents Scholarship in 1974! Small world dOOd.

Posted by: jane at February 22, 2007 03:10 PM (wZLWV)

4 Wow, small world indeed (and now I've got that damned song from DisneyWorld stuck in my head)...the beauty part about the Regents' in the seventies was that there was actually a good chunk of money involved, up to $1000 per semester, if I remember right.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 22, 2007 03:25 PM (p52Ne)

yes, money, I seem to recall there was money involved.

Posted by: jane at February 22, 2007 03:47 PM (wZLWV)

6 no no no if it was the one for getting high scores on the SAT then it was 1979, i thought i got something when i graduated grammer school, which was 1975, geez

Posted by: jane at February 22, 2007 05:23 PM (XXEg4)

7 Hm.

1. According to family lore, which I also never researched, one of my dad's ancestors was Stephen Hopkins, a signer of the Declaration of Independence.

2. I was adopted, hence Stephen Hopkins wasn't my ancestor.

3. I spent one whole hour in a Canadian Navy brig.

4. Chewing tobacco wore down my gums so bad I had to have surgery to keep my lower front teeth from falling out. In high school.

5. At one point, we owned 10 different species of parrot. Personally, I've owned everything from parakeets to macaws, and I used to breed cockatiels. Now we have two Congo African Greys, Winston (after Churchill, whose own macaw is still alive, last I heard) and Vinnie (of course!).

6. I collect hot sauces.

Happy now, Bluto, you BASTARD!!!!!

;-)

Posted by: Vinnie at February 22, 2007 06:38 PM (fdAim)

8 Wow, Double Iron Butt!
BZ

Posted by: grouch at February 22, 2007 07:56 PM (UOuN2)

9 1.My ancestors owe their survival mostly to alcohol bootlegging, black market meat running and various other nefarious occupations like baking, farming and rough-necking. Me, I play with blips.

2. Iâ€™m not allergic to poison ivy

3. This week Iâ€™ve been struggling with the realization that I need to go buy some more â€œfat pantsâ€.

4. I dislike cities and larger towns as a place to reside, nothing personal I just like it quiet.

5. No number 5, just because I randomly refuse to do things for no reason.

6. Like to sing, â€œKing of the Roadâ€ once in a while.

Posted by: Darth Odie at February 22, 2007 08:33 PM (YHZAl)

10 Suitcase for sale or rent, room to let 50 cents, no phone, no pool, no pets, I aint got not cigarettes

weeeeeeeeee

Vinnie, dear, now tell me you were just saying that Navy brig/ parrot/ tobacco chewing story/ hot sause story to make Bluto happy or are you the real pirate in the group?

Posted by: jane at February 22, 2007 09:26 PM (XXEg4)

11 Yarrr, it all be true, lass.

Posted by: Vinnie at February 22, 2007 09:31 PM (fdAim)

12 Ragnar Danneskjold is actually named after one of Ayn Rand's fictional stud characters. But I kind of think Ragnardo Di Cannaskjold is more fitting.

Unfortunately, I kind of take a dump all over Ayn Rand's philosophy everytime I preach my foreign oil doom-mongering. Don't get me started with my eco-babble...

But the reality is that, like many of my friends among Hollywood's clerisy, I know what's good for you all, and all of society, and that is to drive a cute lil' hybird.

Rational self-interest be damned... you fuckers should do what we elite are going to do when travelling to the Oscars... that is to put society's interests ahead of our own, and drive a hybrid.

Posted by: Ragnardo Di Cannaskjold at February 22, 2007 10:28 PM (b0FZu)

13 If everybody rode motorcycles instead of driving pods, we could save more oil than with hybrids. Besides, riding a motorcycle makes you A LOT more careful.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 22, 2007 11:42 PM (p52Ne)

14 Ragnardo and Bluto have solved our oil problem together.

Hybrid motorcycles!

w00 h00!!

Posted by: Vinnie at February 23, 2007 02:54 AM (fdAim)

15 Bluto...driving pods? I thought they were called "cagers" heheh.

Posted by: osamabinthere at February 23, 2007 03:45 AM (ZxuJ4)

16 Stop talking about motorcycles. Makes me miss it. I used to have a CB750k.

Posted by: Darth Odie at February 23, 2007 09:21 AM (YHZAl)

17 Darth odie:

I had a CB750 too. It was an 81 or 82. I don't remember, because the front forks were replaced when the first owner crashed it.

It was big and loud and I loved it. Sitting on an engine and riding the wind was cool.

Ir ode that thing all over the state of California--which is the most beautiful and geographically diverse state in the union.

Now I miss my bike.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 23, 2007 09:07 PM (Dt3sl)

18 Jeff, if you liked Cali so much, why are you hiding in some corn field in Nebraska?

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 24, 2007 12:30 AM (JVqe0)

19 Osamabinhidininhismommyshouse:

I'm a man of the world, bitch.

Where have you been? Besides your momma's tit.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 12:55 AM (Dt3sl)

20 "I'm a man of the world, bitch."

I'll correct your grammatical error:

You're the bitch of the world, man.

"Where have you been? Besides your momma's tit."

Your mama's ass.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 24, 2007 01:18 AM (JVqe0)

21 Good thread until comment #18. Poking with a stick! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 09:32 PM (2OHpj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

February 16, 2007

Interview With a Vampire

Self-proclaimed "Independent Left Journalist" Robert Lindsay writes to inform us that he has interviewed neo-Nazi sympathizer Andrew Winkler, fuehrer of the Holocaust denial website ZioPedia. The site has been linked to the recent attack on Elie Wiesel.

After Winkler confirms that Lindsay helped inspire the name for his website, Lindsay conducts the sort of sympathetic, softball interview that a Jew-hater can expect from the Left.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:26 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Bluto 87 % of the Jewish vote in our last Federal election went to the Democrats. The Jews of the United states have been one of the traditional BASES of the Democratic Party.

Posted by: JOHN RYAN at February 16, 2007 02:03 PM (TcoRJ)

2 Well, I guess the whole global warming theory is shot, since hell just froze over, because John is exactly right. Jews are overwhelmingly leftist, and leftists are by definition anti-American, and thus the Jews are taking ranks with the very enemies that would destroy them. None of this makes any sense, and so must signify something that cannot be clearly seen at this time.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 16, 2007 02:55 PM (6zYAC)

3 Johnny: the blacks went even more overwhelmingly Democrat, yet have gotten squat but lip service from the Dems since the 1960s. Any more irrelevant factoids you want to try to use in lieu of a rational argument? Didn't think so. Next.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 16, 2007 03:29 PM (p52Ne)

Some real whackos at Zeopedia.

Anyway as far as John Lyins contention. It's pure bullshit. 87% of the Jewish vote went to the Republicians. This ignorant asshole has made this stupid claim over and over. At least 50 times. John Lyin. If you can't come up with something new or truthful fuck off you lying little weasel.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 16, 2007 11:02 PM (7m0Mc)

5 By now I'm pretty damn sure that John Ryan real name is mohammed lyinasshole. Just a camel dung smelling raghead in disquise. or perhaps he's being buggered by one. Same to me. Lower than snake shit.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 16, 2007 11:04 PM (7m0Mc)

6 Why is everyone jumping on John the one time he's right? You guys have become what the lefturds accused you of being all along.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 17, 2007 01:36 PM (eGb9y)

7 IM: it doesn't matter whether he is or isn't. As usual, JR throws out irrelevancies to mask his lack of real argument.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 17, 2007 04:35 PM (p52Ne)

8 He ain't right. Those in politics, the movies and academia to not represent the majority who don't make noise.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 18, 2007 08:05 PM (v+LdF)

9 Rooster, you're wrong; while there are a few, very few, Jews who will
come out as completely pro-American, most of them don't really like us
even though their fate is tied to ours. I know more about people than
you can possibly imagine because I pay attention to everyone, and Jews
are overwhelmingly hard leftists. That's okay though, because things
are about to get turned inside out and upside down pretty soon, and all
the lefturds and other lowlife scum who have sheltered under our
Liberty while attempting to destroy it will be shown the error of their
ways.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 19, 2007 09:28 AM (eGb9y)

10 Gee! I'm going to have to quit arguing with my KKK buddies. All this time I thought they wouldn't let me in because I wasn't a Christian.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 20, 2007 03:04 AM (PFUNQ)

11 Nah, Gayrooster. They let you in because you were stupid enough.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 22, 2007 04:16 PM (ZxuJ4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

All Your Supermarkets Are Belongs to Us

And by "us", of course we mean Hugo Chavez.

Posted by: Rusty at 10:50 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.

February 12, 2007

No Snickering From Women Will Be Tolerated

This painful story of the dangers of shrinkage is an example of the pain that only a man can suffer.

(If graphic is too small, go to The Dread Pundit Bluto for a more manly sized view)

Via Cookie, who has more stories of the bizarre and the lascivious.

Posted by: Bluto at 05:42 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.

February 08, 2007

Fortress of Solitude to be Built in Arctic

Idiots:

An Arctic "doomsday vault" aimed at providing mankind with food in case of a global catastrophe will be designed to sustain the effects of climate change, the project's builders said as they unveiled the architectural plans.
The top-security repository, carved into the permafrost of a mountain in the remote Svalbard archipelago near the North Pole, will preserve some three million batches of seeds from all known varieties of the planet's crops.

I demand an environmental impact study.

Posted by: Bluto at 10:44 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.

January 26, 2007

President Peanut Issues Kerryesque Non-Apology

After fifteen of his staffers resigned over Carter's new book, "Palestine: Peace not Apartheid," America's worst president has apologized for "improper and stupid" wording.

From the Washington Times:

"I apologize to you personally and to everyone here," Mr. Carter said when asked about the passage by a student during his appearance at Brandeis University on Tuesday. After explaining that the passage was "worded in a completely improper and stupid way," Mr. Carter said he has asked publisher Simon & Schuster Inc. to change the wording in future editions of the book.

Carter's own "botched joke" justified Palestinian terrorism against Israelis. But the Carter Center staffers who resigned did it because of the entire book, not just selected passages.

Meanwhile, President Peanut's friends in the mainstream media have been doing their best to keep this on the downlow.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:12 PM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Carter received a standing ovation at Brandeis. 87% of the Jewish vote went to the Democrats in our last Federal election.
Also the 15 who resigned were not staffers as you said. They were members of the Advisory Board. They do not work for the Center. At the time of their resignations there were over 200 Advisory Board members, so about 6% resigned.

Posted by: John Ryan at January 26, 2007 01:43 PM (TcoRJ)

2 So then, John Ryan, that means you agree with Jimmuh that the Jooos have to die?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 26, 2007 02:13 PM (p52Ne)

3 Carter wasn't a good president, but the worst president ever is clearly George Bush. It's not even close. He is a train wreck.

Posted by: PoliticalCritic at January 26, 2007 02:42 PM (K1z+J)

4 Politcal Critic: Tell me how old were you from 76 to 80?
Why? Because either A: you are too young to know WTF you are talking about (in which case I can forgive you): or B: you are an idiot (no hope, you can't cure stupid).

Posted by: Howie at January 26, 2007 02:47 PM (2cR/Y)

5 Once again, THIS Peanut would have been a better president than the other peanut !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWThRmRW6GE

Posted by: memphis761 at January 26, 2007 03:01 PM (2cR/Y)

6 Even though both said they didn't mean any harm, Carter's apology is much better than Kerry's, because Carter actually acknowledged making a mistake. Kerry used passive voice and apologized that people misunderstood him. Carter used active voice and apologized for phrasing something in a stupid way. So Carter took responsibility, and Kerry didn't.

On "Worst president ever," Buchanan and Harding our generally accepted as the worst. I'd agree from an immediate damage standpoint, they are pretty bad. Both caused immediate harm to the country and no lasting benefits. Looking at long long term ideological damage to the country, however, I'd pick Woodrow Wilson as the worst president ever. Anyone who claims Bush is the worst ever has not taken a proper US history course -- probably a high school freshman.

Posted by: wooga at January 26, 2007 03:03 PM (t9sT5)

7 Buchanan and Harding didn't continue trying to damage the country decades after they were out of office as Carter is doing. And neither one empowered an enemy like Iran, as Carter did through his abject incompetence before, during, and after the hostage crisis.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 26, 2007 04:14 PM (p52Ne)

8 John does have a point here; the Jews are proving incredibly stupid of
late, and I'm beginning to question their sanity as a group since they
seem to suffer from the same madness as has infected lefturds in
general.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 26, 2007 05:36 PM (eGb9y)

9 Actually 40%-50% of Israeli Jews qualify as "self-hating" by
neocon "right" American political standards, because of their
positions on the settlemets, etc.

Carter should NOT have apologized however-the Pals have a right
to resist UNTIL Carter's reccomendations are in the process of
implementation.

Posted by: Ken Hoop at January 26, 2007 08:17 PM (7GYBH)

10 Carter, when asked what the biggest regret of his presidency was answered that sending 8 helicopters instead of 10 to rescue the hostages in Tehran. That's his biggest mistake. The rescue operation, he said, would have worked if they had 2 more helicopters. LOL. Worse president in our history doesn't even begin to describe him. And you can add worst EX-president as well.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 26, 2007 09:04 PM (8e/V4)

11 Ken Poop:

Why am I not surprised that you think dem neocon Jooos forced Carter to apologize?

Sig Heil!

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 26, 2007 10:44 PM (Dt3sl)

12 Ken Hoop: since Pali "resistance" means sending out babyhunters to look for Israeli soft targets, you have put yourself in the position of advocating terrorism against the Jews. Sieg Heil, indeed.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 27, 2007 12:14 PM (p52Ne)

13 #6 wooga: Interesting choices. I know Harding had Teapot Dome and similar scandals, but why Buchanan?
Also, I presume you chose Wilson for the whole League of Nations thing and the precedent it set.
#3 Political Critic: Under Carter, the inflation rate went from 4% to 20%. The friendly neighborhood 6-for-5 every week legbreaking loan shark actually had competitive rates with major financial institutions. Morale in the military reached a nadir. As others have pointed out, Carter's toothless response to the hostage taking set the stage for a lot of the problems we are having with the Saracens today.
Bush has had lots of problems--no argument there.
The war has been run on the cheap, apparently with little or no long-term planning at the start, ROE's which are more dangerous to our troops than to the enemy, not to mention the constant effort to portray this as Vietnam redux. The ROE problem is apparently being solved. The others, well, we'll see. As was pointed out on, I believe, Protein Wisdom, lack of failure in Iraq is not an option for liberals. This is because if we succeed in Iraq, it will cause people to again look at Vietnam and to uncover truths which are unpleasant to liberals.
As to the economy, it is way better than under Carter, and I say this as someone who has not been employed full-time since May (anyone who wants to hire a 52 yr. old chemist please drop me a line). Bush inherited an economy perched on top of the .com bubble just before the venture capitalists who had funded said bubble started asking hard questions about what they were getting for their money, thereby causing the bubble to burst, thereby causing 1929 lite. The company I worked for at the time manufactured electronic materials primarily used by circuit board manufacturers, so I had a ringside seat for the collapse.
IMHO, Carter beats Wilson for worst. Wilson may take second depending on wooga's reasoning. Clinton is right up there, rounding out our top/bottom three. This is on the basis of both his domestic and foreign policies. Before someone starts ranting about the surplus, re-read the section above about the .com bubble. It was all smoke and mirrors. Add into that the fact that the Republican-controlled Congress stopped Hillarycare in its tracks and forced welfare reform down Clinton's throat, and you have the reasons for the surpluses (or were they only projected surpluses, I forget). His foreign policy seemed to consist mainly of kowtowing to the UN and European sensibilities. Hence the rating at the bottom.

Posted by: irish19 at January 27, 2007 12:32 PM (RkpPp)

14 All you anti-Israel lefturds should remember that it was created as a state by your beloved, Communist founded UN.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 27, 2007 04:58 PM (eGb9y)

15 The UN is proof that majority rule is stupid. Those that are qualified should rule and those that are qualified should be the ones allowed to vote. Elections are getting to be detriment to a countrys' stability. Would you ask a class of 1st graders to pick their teacher? The winner would be the one who promised the most candy. Our national elections are turning to be just that.

Posted by: greyrooster at January 28, 2007 01:21 AM (w+w6p)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 24, 2007

Freshman Senator Raises Bar For DemSpeak, Creates New Military Tactic

Democratic senator Jim Webb has set a brilliant new standard for doubletalk in his reply to President Bush's State of the Union speech:

"Not one step back from the war against international terrorism. Not a precipitous withdrawal that ignores the possibility of further chaos," said Webb. "But an immediate shift toward strong regionally based diplomacy, a policy that takes our soldiers off the streets of Iraq's cities and a formula that will in short order allow our combat forces to leave Iraq."

So, Senator Webb would have a "withdrawal" that is not "one step back." We are to withdraw forward by retreating but not taking one backwards step while shifting away from the front. It's called the "moonwalk."

As our military performs this unique evolution, our politicians are to speak loudly while flagellating themselves with small sticks.

Posted by: Bluto at 10:38 AM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Interesting that the Dems chose a guy best known for writing about a father putting his 4-year-old's penis in his mouth to give their Democratic Retort.

Posted by: Billy at January 24, 2007 12:15 PM (Gp5c0)

2 What do you expect?!! Webb's a liberal anti-war draftee veteran of Vietnam. None of them understand what the war on terrorism is all about.

Posted by: Gary Veazey at January 24, 2007 12:58 PM (fC2pg)

3 Well Billy he was also known for other things. but if that is something that you find "interesting" than I guess that is how you will remember him.
A classmate at the Naval Academy of Oliver North Webb also chose to join the Marines. He won the Navy Cross, a Silver Star, 2 Bronze Stars and 2 Purple Hearts. In 1987 He was appointed Secretary of the Navy, and resigned in 1988 rather than go along with a reduction in the size of the fleet.
Bluto your analysis of his speech ranks right up there with your analysis of the "pummeling" that Hezbollah received after their battles with Israel (Hezbollah is now poised to take over Lebanon), the "what if they gave a civil war and nobody came" Iraq posting (currently running at abot 3000 dead per month), and your pre- election accolade of Karl Rove "brilliant"
Even Webb's classmate Olliver North is against the surge. During an interview with O'Reilly he said that on his last trip to Iraq everyone he spoke with seving there was against sending more troops. Here is a link to that interview.

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/north-troops-oppose-escalation/

Posted by: John Ryan at January 24, 2007 12:58 PM (TcoRJ)

4 Benedict Arnold was a war hero and a general. John Ryan, on the other hand, is simply a traitor.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 24, 2007 01:44 PM (p52Ne)

5 Reminds me a great deal of President Bush, who has said that combating terrorism, of which we are to believe Iraq is a part, constitutes "a
decisive ideological struggle" and that "nothing is more
important at this moment in our history than for America to succeed. At the same time he says America's commitment to the current Iraq action is "not
open-ended."

How can both claims possibly be true?

If nothing is more important, shouldn't it be open-ended? And if it's not open-ended, does he really believe it's all that
important?

Maybe some day he'll figure out what he actually means and communicate it without the double-speak. But I doubt it.

Posted by: Gleep! at January 24, 2007 01:57 PM (Zlbra)

6 What he's saying, Glorp, is that nothing is more important than America's success to patriotic Americans, not to folks like yourself and John Ryan, who salivate over dead Americans as a means to power for your party.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 24, 2007 02:12 PM (p52Ne)

7 Ah, back to annointing yourself a patriotic American as well as a George Bush apologist. The second point has been successfully proven, I'll say that. Keep working on the first ... you need improvement.

Posted by: Gleep! at January 24, 2007 02:20 PM (Zlbra)

8 It took Jim Webb a VETERAN of real war not bar wars like Georgie fought less than nine minutes to say calvacades more about the mindset that 70% of the nation has about Iraq than Georgie boy tried to do in over 50 minutes.

No matter what you right wing idiots claim about this escalation of sending kids into a meat grinder this is the worst president ever and we must start now apologizing to the rest of the world for the gargantuan mistake Georgie boy ade in invading a sovereign nation.

Maybe now we can get down to the business of rectifying what is wrong with America (getting the 30% dead enders out of political office would be a grand start) and show the rest of the world that we respect them, that we want to live alongside them, not control them.

As to Iraq, Webb pegged it. If Georgie boy doesn't understand what the American public wants (remember those are THEIR kids dying for oil) then WE will "be showing him the way".

Georgie should just resign and go back to cutting brush. He is SOOO in over his head.

Posted by: civilbehavior at January 24, 2007 02:25 PM (v16Xc)

9 No, Glorp, my patriotism has never been questioned, at least not by anyone with an IQ above room temperature. The real point is your eagerness for bad things to happen to fellow Americans. That's what the Democratic Party is all about, these days. But why are you and John Ryan such cowards about it? Why not come out from hiding in other people's comments and start your own blogs? Don't worry, even mildly retarded quislings such as yourself can handle it. It's easy. Of course, then you have an obligation to actually support your anti-American views, but you can do that, can't you?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 24, 2007 02:27 PM (p52Ne)

10 civilbehavior: explain exactly what Webb said, taking into account the contradictory statements he made. Let me make it easy for you, you dishonest POS; Webb said we must retreat, but we must not retreat. If you're too stupid to recognize double-speak when it's served up to you with a spoon, you shouldn't embarrass yourself by commenting here.

Alternatively, pull your head out of your ass and start supporting your country, instead of just your party.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 24, 2007 02:31 PM (p52Ne)

11 No, Glorp, my patriotism has never been questioned, at least not by anyone with an IQ above room temperature.
Nor have I, except here. Must be that IQ thing you mentioned.

The real point is your eagerness for bad things to happen to fellow Americans.
I'm not complicit in the wasted lives of 3,000+ US soldiers; you are. Therefore let accusation of eagerness land where they best belong.

Why not come out from hiding in other people's comments and start your own blogs?

You're probably right, retardation and all. But perhaps if rightwing bloggers were less insistant on using a public medium to create very private, well-insulated rightwing worlds and more interested in intelligently debating actual positions, the annoyance might not be so great. Note that only rightwing blogs refer to those with alternate views as "trolls."

And to steal a line from another post:
Alternatively, pull your head out of your ass and start supporting your country, instead of just your party.

Well said .... I suggest you start taking your own advice.

Posted by: Gleep! at January 24, 2007 02:56 PM (Zlbra)

"Note that only rightwing blogs refer to those with alternate views as 'trolls.'" - Why then, whatever do the KosKidz mean when they refer to "troll diaries," and why do they delete every comment with which they disagree. And why does Firedoglake post "troll IP"s and delete every comment with which they disagree?

Are you saying that they mean something different by "troll," or are you saying that DailyKos and Firedoglake are really rightwing blogs in drag? Or are you saying that you've just shown everyone the reason you're afraid to start your own blog, mainly, because you're an idiot?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 24, 2007 03:11 PM (p52Ne)

13 And before you blithely excuse yourself on your other idiotic point about our war dead, how many of them died because of the aid and comfort you and your party have given them? How many have died because the Democratic party made it crystal clear that they celebrated each death as a new stick with which to beat their political foes? Nothing heartens a terrorist insurgent like knowing he enjoys the support of folks like Gleep, John Ryan, civilbehavior...and Jim Webb.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 24, 2007 03:15 PM (p52Ne)

14 Why then, whatever do the KosKidz mean when they refer to "troll
diaries," and why do they delete every comment with which they
disagree. And why does Firedoglake post "troll IP"s and delete every
comment with which they disagree?

I don't know that they do; if so, you'd have to ask them. For myself, I've never heard of Firedoglake. Daily Kos I know and have visited less than a half-dozen times in the 18 months since I've discovered blogging.

I know my positions; why would I go to a blogsite just to have some guy in Idaho or someplace agree with me? That's a rightwing need I don't share.

And before you blithely excuse yourself on your other idiotic point
about our war dead, how many of them died because of the aid and
comfort you and your party have given them?

Oh, thats' easy. Exactly none. Zero. Zip. I don't know of a single soldier, private contractor or civilian who has died because of opposition to the war (and some on this blog would point out to you it is not a war; we haven't been at war with Iraq since 2003). I've found it's much easier to find those who have died as a direct result of the support of the war, however.

Posted by: Gleep! at January 24, 2007 03:57 PM (Zlbra)

So Glorp, is it still your position that only rightwing sites use the word "troll," or have you decided to leave your head stuffed up your ass, as you have regarding the aid and comfort you have given our enemies in the propaganda war? Being a traitor is bad enough, stupid traitor is even worse.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 24, 2007 05:30 PM (p52Ne)

16 And Gleep is a stupid, ignorant traitor.

Posted by: greyrooster at January 24, 2007 06:11 PM (w+w6p)

17 And Gleep is a stupid, ignorant traitor.

Coming from the single-toothed assistant Grand Wizard, that means exactly what one would think it means. Shit.

Posted by: Gleep! at January 25, 2007 10:14 AM (Zlbra)

18 Creep and Snivel Behaviour:

Please explain a few things about your comments.

Why does a single part of a "decisive ideological struggle" have to be open ended? How is "success" open ended?

Is either Hillary Clinton or Barack Osama Obama a "veteran of a real war?"

Why are you proven apologists for terrorists?

Is Dhimmiecrat political power more important than killing terrorists and protecting the innocent?

What poll can you cite that claims 70% of Americans want our soldiers to flee from Iraq immediately?

Why should America apologize to the whole world for overthrowing a genocidal Tyrant? Should U.S. soldiers apologize for paying with their own blood to protect Iraqis from invading terrorists?

Are there any minors ("kids") fighting in Iraq who are incapable of making their own decisions? Do they need Mother Sheehan to hold their weinies while they pee-pee?

Where is the oil Bush seized for his Texas cronies?

What makes you think misdirection makes for a proper debate?

If you don't need to go to a blog to have some guy in Idaho (beautiful state,) agree with you, how many conservative friends do you have?

The terrorists use leftoid opposition to America's presence in Iraq as a recruiting tool. How many people do you suppose have died as a result?

How many American soldiers have died because real americans support them? Are conservitives travelling to Iraq to set off IEDS, or is it islamopithecine terrorists?

Do you think you can fool anyone with your feigned concern for American soldiers? Do those soldiers need traitorous pussies like you to speak for them?

Terrorists attacked us on our own soil. Why do you oppose counter attacks on theirs?

Since all leftoids share the same brain, either one of you can dodge these questions.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 25, 2007 11:27 AM (Dt3sl)

19 Do I smell cock and breath? Oh, hello Jeff. As a rule, I don't address those who've mistaken filibuster and diatribe for debate. But I will make one exception for you:

"Fuck Off."

Posted by: Gleep! at January 25, 2007 02:07 PM (Zlbra)

20 Creep:

You really told me. Your ad hominem excuse for an argument was too much for me.

How do you know what cocks smell like? Since I'm not in the room with you, whose breath are you sniffing? Enjoy the chin nuts, fruitloop.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 27, 2007 11:28 PM (Dt3sl)

21 fff

Posted by: f at March 27, 2007 05:14 AM (q34NC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 23, 2007

Top Five Terrorist Organizations Hoping for a Failed Iraqi State

5. Al Qaeda - a new base of operations to replace Afghanistan is just what the Doctor (Zawahiri) ordered.

4. Hamas - since sugar daddy Saddam's necktie party, the brave jihadi babyhunters of Hamas could use some support.

3. Hezbollah - Hamas' Lebanese cousins would welcome a nice training/recruitment site.

2. The Mainstream Media - reporting from Iraq is expensive; the sooner the MSM can begin ignoring the inevitable Vietnam/style bloodbath they've worked so hard to bring about, the better for their profit margins.

1. The Democratic Party - ever an organization to sacrifice truth, justice, and the American way on the altar of political expediency, the donkeys haven't had so much fun since the glory days of the Ku Klux Klan.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:43 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Bluto
Bluto
Bluto
The Democratic Party is now the choice of most Americans. We are not hoping for a failed state to replace Iraq, but it seems that under current policies of Bush this is becoming more likely, if it has not already occured.

Posted by: John Ryan at January 23, 2007 02:28 PM (1dOeJ)

2 John ryan,

we alread know those talking points. But tell me why only last year Pelosi was blaming Rumsfeld for too few troops in Iraq, but now she's against more troops. The only explanation I have is Bluto's argument about Democrat political expediency. Do you have another one?

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 23, 2007 02:43 PM (8e/V4)

3 we alread know those talking points. But tell me why only last year Pelosi was blaming Rumsfeld for too few troops in Iraq, but now she's against more troops. The only explanation I have is Bluto's argument about Democrat political expediency. Do you have another one?

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos

Nice try sir, but no dice. We DID have too few troops in Iraq to start and finish the job. Once the Bush administration trained more terrorists over the last 12 -24 months, the situation spiraled out of control - where it is today. Now because of the terrorist training program being accomplished, we are outgunned and outnumbered.

Posted by: Tom at January 23, 2007 05:01 PM (2/n6+)

4 tom,

so last year more troops was good policy, but this year it isn't because in only ONE YEAR the terrorists managed to train enough people to outgun us so now it's too late. LOL. I know you don't really believe that. Great spin though!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 23, 2007 05:15 PM (8e/V4)

5 Hamas received more support from Iran than Saddam, if I'm not
mistaken-and Iran has been much stengthened by the neocon
war.

Posted by: Ken Hoop at January 23, 2007 06:30 PM (EPkr9)

6
Hamas received more support from Iran than Saddam, if I'm not
mistaken-and Iran has been much stengthened by the neocon
war.

Then you must love the neocons.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 23, 2007 07:35 PM (8e/V4)

7 Wouldn't ie be so nice if liberals hated terrorism as much as they hate the president and the United States of America? We might actually have a chance to rid the world of its evils. But, the haters will make sure that terrorism is around for a long, long time...

Posted by: Feist at January 23, 2007 08:29 PM (cUUvl)

8 Ouch! Thre moonbat swatting here was so extreme, it hurt even me!

Better luck next time, scum-holes.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 23, 2007 10:11 PM (abVz3)

9 John Lyin: The democrat party is now the choice of those who wish they were Americans.

Posted by: greyrooster at January 24, 2007 12:47 AM (w+w6p)

I came up with a list for Democrats so they can remember
what they stand for (their stances change every 37 days).

Things liberals hate: America,
President George W. Bush, children (born and unborn), puppies, Abraham Lincoln,
America, me, you, country music, America, the military, the 'issues,' kittens, poor people,
freedom, America, logic, speech, Israel, fishing, America, minorities, Christians,
the pursuit of happiness, wit, subtlety, courage, America, anybody different
than them, etc.

Things liberals love: hypocrisy, FDR, JFK, LBJ (own Vietnamâ€¦OWN
IT!) MSM, MTV, terrorism, monkey poop,
Starbucks, the Daily Show, any country that is not America,
the Gap.

Laminate this and put it in your pocket so that when your
indoctrinator, I mean college professor asks you what you stand for, you can
pull this out, recite your list and earn your â€˜A.â€™

Posted by: Feist at January 24, 2007 11:44 AM (cUUvl)

11 Add another now - the GOP.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 24, 2007 09:41 PM (eGb9y)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 21, 2007

Bush Blamed In New Orleans Loss

President Bush is seen by some to have contributed to the New Orleans Saints' 39-14 drubbing at the hands of the Chicago Bears this afternoon.

"Anyone could see they was in trouble," New Orleans mayor Ray "Chocolate City" Nagin remarked, "It's an indictment of the current administration that no help whatsoever was forthcoming."

Singer Kanye West believes that the Saints can't count on support from the President because there are too many African Americans on the team.

"The fact that Chicago has an African American coach just gives the buckra in the White House cover," said the artist.

Posted by: Bluto at 05:28 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 104 words, total size 1 kb.

January 17, 2007

Bottom Five Professions Ranking Above Mainstream Journalist

With the spate of fake and staged news coming out of the Middle East, all designed to undermine the United States and its allies in the War on Terror, a new South Hamilton Institute of Technology poll shows American Journalists sucking hind teat to more respected occupations.

The last five ranking above "Journalist" are:

5. Crack Whore
4. Male Crack Whore
3. Crack Whore Pimp
2. Keith Olbermann's Fluffer, Raoul
1. Boil Sucker

Posted by: Bluto at 02:21 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.

January 04, 2007

The Final Collapse of Civilization is Imminent

The ancient Mayan calendar sets the date as December 21, 2012. They may have been too optmistic.

Posted by: Bluto at 04:17 PM | Comments (17) | Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.

December 11, 2006

Leftist Blogger: 'Spitting on Soldier Not News'

"Phriendly Jaime" at ~~West of Shockoe~~ (the twit at Shockoe didn't realize that changing the title of a Blogger post also changes the URL, here's the new link) thinks prosecuting Lauren Maggi, accused of spitting in a soldier's face at Syracuse's Hancock Airport on November 22, is a waste of time.

And PJ has taken issue with me for blogging about the shameful incident. Unfortunately for PJ, he doesn't have his facts straight, but that doesn't prevent the typical, leftist rant that follows his snap judgement.

Worse, he doesn't think spitting in a soldier's face is a crime worth wasting taxpayers' money on, and anyway, PJ implies that the soldier is probably lying about the whole thing.

Phriendly Jaime's rant begins: more...

Posted by: Bluto at 12:54 PM | Comments (17) | Add Comment
Post contains 1025 words, total size 7 kb.

1 The cost of charging her? Isn't that what fines are for?

Posted by: Darth Odie at December 11, 2006 01:58 PM (YdcZ0)

2 What PJ fails to recognize is that, if the soldier fails to press charges, then in 20 years it will be claimed that the incident never happened. (Of course, PJ's already getting a jump on that revisionism.)

That is part of the core of Lembcke's claims about Vietnam vets being spat upon---why are there no stories about soldiers beating up those who spit on them, or pressing charges?

(Again, let me note that I think Lembcke's full of it, but the fact that you have revisionism on such a scale only means that, yes, you do have to press charges and take it to court and, hopefully, get the stories written up in the MSM.)

Posted by: Lurking Observer at December 11, 2006 02:12 PM (/ZD7V)

3 Methinks the Leftard protests too much. He seems pretty defensive about the whole thing. Gee, I wonder why.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 11, 2006 02:42 PM (8e/V4)

4 It is a good thing this did not occur in Texas.
Spitting on someone is considered assault!
PJ - What a moronic wretch!

Posted by: Melissa In Texas at December 11, 2006 03:33 PM (bbxLM)

5 Isn't spitting on someone considered an assalt? It is here in "Doity Joisey". In any case, if she'd spit on me I'd have, (defending myself?), decked her.

Posted by: Pixelkiller at December 11, 2006 03:43 PM (Hs5GZ)

6 Bluto,

your link to the Leftard's site broke.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 11, 2006 03:44 PM (8e/V4)

7 Jesusland Carlos, the leftard in question didn't realize that by changing the title of her post, she caused Blogger to create a new URL. I just told her that I won't update the link unless she's nice to me.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at December 11, 2006 03:54 PM (vBK4C)

8 Opps I fixed the link. sorry, I can break it again f you want?

Posted by: Howie at December 11, 2006 03:56 PM (YdcZ0)

9 Notice how phriendly jaimie deleted just about every comment that wasn't posted by a complacent Leftbot.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 11, 2006 03:57 PM (8e/V4)

She said she's turned on comment moderation because of "spam."

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at December 11, 2006 04:03 PM (vBK4C)

11 She said she's turned on comment moderation because of "spam."

Yah, "spam". ROFLMAO!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 11, 2006 04:06 PM (8e/V4)

12 PJ is pissed because stories like this show just how much the left doesn't support our troops. She wants it to go away, so the Msm can get down to their real business of bashing Bush and the mission in Iraq.

Hm. She leans to the far left, she's dishonest, she's shrill, she's a lousy writer, and she wants America out of Iraq now. The AP will probably snap her up as a stringer.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 11, 2006 04:09 PM (bLPT+)

13 Another lefturd who needs a long drop on a short rope; nothing more, nothing less.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 11, 2006 05:48 PM (v3I+x)

14 PJ seems to be an idiot at her very best.
Maybe we'll get lucky and she'll kill herself.
If nothing else, the ignorant bitch should be grateful for the traffic.

Posted by: dick at December 11, 2006 06:21 PM (iDQvf)

15 The obvious truth of the matter is that, for PJ as for so many leftists, the law is only supposed to protect leftists. All others are fair game for assault and worse.

Posted by: pst314 at December 11, 2006 09:46 PM (lCxSZ)

16 Recently, West of Shockoe has been attacking SWAC Republicans (from the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia) with frightening voraciousness. I've called her out on my blog twice to step up to the plate to face those accusations of a 'non-story' as you have addressed on this site. She has not yet, to date, responded to my questions. Funny when Dems are asked to backup their facts and opinions, they simply cannot. Perhaps if she reads this post, she will take the time to respond to my questions. All of SWAC that she has personally attacked through blog posts and personal emails are waiting.....

Time to step up to the plate PJ...

Posted by: JohnMaxfield at December 12, 2006 04:54 PM (mK+50)

17 I'm very familiar with Leftists like Jaimie, who use the harshest tone and rhetoric against their opponents, but can't/refuse to engage even the most mild-mannered responses to their attacks. They either ignore or delete. Here she deleted almost all the responses and blamed it on "spam". We know she's lying, and she knows we know, so essentially she's lying only to her own mind-numbed readers.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 13, 2006 12:31 AM (8e/V4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

December 10, 2006

Alec Baldwin: 'Get Rid of the CIA' to Defeat Terrorism

Alec Baldwin, whose foreign relations and counter-terrorism expertise is founded on playing the role of Jack Ryan in The Hunt for Red October, has decided that we need to abolish the Central Intelligence Agency. This is Alec's "oddly simple" "first step" to defeating terrorism (brave Alec also takes the opportunity to bash Jeane Kirkpatrick, now that she's safely dead).

Has Alec discovered a new principle here? Can we defeat crime by abolishing the police? Will housefires disappear if we send the firemen packing? Can we eliminate plane crashes by eliminating the FAA?

Of course not.

The clue to Alec's Bizarro World thinking comes at the beginning of his post. He thinks that the Right is obssessing about the Vietnam War. Yes Alec, the Right is taking every opportunity to shout "quagmire" hoping to demoralize our troops and the people being protected by them at home.

This is what happens when stupid people play smart people in movies and on TV.

Previous Baldwin Buffoonery here.

Posted by: Bluto at 11:11 AM | Comments (234) | Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.

November 16, 2006

Pelosi and Company Give Us a Preview of Dem 'Leadership'

From the Washington Post:

A showdown over the House majority leader's post today has Democrats bitterly divided only a week after their party took control of Congress and has prompted numerous complaints that Speaker-designate Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and her allies are using strong-arm tactics and threats to try to elect Rep. John P. Murtha (Pa.) to the job.

Murtha is best known for his brilliant proposed strategy of redeploying our troops to Okinawa, and being an unindicted co-conspirator in the Abscam scandal. That's probably why he's blocking new ethics rules:

Murtha, 74, a former Marine who was among the first on Capitol Hill to call for a U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq, may have hurt his own chances Tuesday night when he derided the Democrats' ethics and lobbying package before saying he will push for its passage anyway out of deference to Pelosi. His statement, at a gathering of conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats, was cited by backers of his rival, Rep. Steny H. Hoyer (Md.), as further proof that Murtha's controversial ethics record disqualifies him to lead the party in a new political era.

Meanwhile, loose cannon Russ Feingold is working to make the US phone system safe for terrorists, and Dennis Kucinich wants to make Iraq safe for terrorists by cutting off military funding.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:33 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 221 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Actually, this is just a preview of the next two years. Nothing of importance will get done, divisions will widen, the presidential election in 2008 will get nastier than ever, and the Islamists will consolidate their positions all around the World, while the liberals fiddle...fiddle...fiddle....while Rome...well, you get the idea.

But it will be fun for us bloggers. We will have a field day, with more fodder than ever before. But our country will go to hell.

Posted by: jesusland joe at November 16, 2006 10:08 AM (8PoNP)

2 Instead of fiddling, why don't you go out and support your candidate, whoever that may turn out to be in 2008. In the meantime, you might want to support the government that was elected. That's what I tried to do.

Be constuctive. Not destuctive. Give them more that just a few days. After all you had 6 years to try and get it right. There's corruption on both sides JJ. And there always will be.

Posted by: No Fear at November 16, 2006 10:17 AM (ZQepB)

3 If the Democrats do an about face and decide to support the country and the troops, then I will support them. If they persist in their pre-9/11 blame-America-first mentality, I will not.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at November 16, 2006 10:44 AM (vBK4C)

4 Bluto, that's about where I stand, also.

Posted by: jesusland joe at November 16, 2006 11:06 AM (8PoNP)

What makes you think the Dems don't support the troops. My son enlisted. I didn't want him too. Not for this war, not under this administration, but there it is and so is he. I want what is best for him and this country. For me it is what do we do now. What path to take. Period. We have to stop throwing good after bad and figure a way out. We can only do this if we communicate.

Posted by: No Fear at November 16, 2006 11:16 AM (ZQepB)

6 NoFear, I have no doubt you support the troops, but when we have people like John Murtha making ridiculous statements like redeploying to Okinawa, where we don't even have a base, or soon won't, many serious people have little faith in the Left side of the Democratic Party. How could someone in his position not know this? And his rush to judgment, and his accusations against some of our troops, even before any investigation had taken place, leaves me with little confidence in his abilities as a leader.

Posted by: jesusland joe at November 16, 2006 12:06 PM (8PoNP)

7 Well, Murtha's out, Hoyer's in. Looks like those with questionable political resumes don't move ahead in the Democratic party!

Posted by: Gleep! at November 16, 2006 01:24 PM (a7sMc)

8 Except for Pelosi, Reid, Jefferson, Hastings...

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at November 16, 2006 02:03 PM (vBK4C)

They will be no different then what we had previouly

Posted by: sandpiper at November 16, 2006 04:49 PM (O2c+K)

10 Except for Pelosi, Reid, Jefferson, Hastings...

Well, recalling few laments from you Bluto as Delay, DeWine, Ney and company forwarded their careers and party objectives, I think I'll hold judgement until I see what really comes of it all.

Posted by: Gleep! at November 16, 2006 05:25 PM (a7sMc)

11 Hastings! God, what a joke on the American people. I thought the dems ran that creep off for good. Guess he found enough black bigots to elect him. This asshole is millions in the hole and hasn't a pot to piss in. Where do you think he plans on getting the money to pay his bills? Murtha, Willie Jefferson, Hastings. How can the lefturds be so stupid.

Whoa! Wait a minute here. These idiots will screw up and embarass the dems by 2008. There's something good in everything.

Posted by: Greyrooster at November 17, 2006 01:54 AM (R6qo5)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

November 14, 2006

Three-Alarm Pants Fire Alert

I was searching for video of the Mouth of Sauron from the Lord of the Rings movies, and came across this NewsBusters story from July. Mincing metrosexual milquetoast Keith Olbermann actually said, with a straight face mind you, that he is politically "neutral." NewsBusters has the video. Here's part of the transcript: more...

Posted by: Bluto at 02:09 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 204 words, total size 1 kb.

306kb generated in CPU 0.0993, elapsed 0.1616 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.0811 seconds, 727 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

March 26, 2007

March 17, 2007

March 15, 2007

March 13, 2007

March 07, 2007

March 03, 2007

March 02, 2007

February 27, 2007

February 22, 2007

February 16, 2007

February 12, 2007

February 08, 2007

January 26, 2007

January 24, 2007

January 23, 2007

January 21, 2007

January 17, 2007

January 04, 2007

December 11, 2006

December 10, 2006

November 16, 2006

November 14, 2006

Recent Comments