Jeff Gannon Raises Katrina Funds
Jeff Gannon's big gay c*ck is raising hurricaine Katrina funds. Wait, did I say Jeff Gannon? I meant Jeff Harrell. Donate, or he will expose himself.*
1
The last time I exposed myself, I had to pay a hefty fine to the city. I wonder if that money went to hurricane relief... since it happened yesterday and all. Though I still feel bad about the nuns that witnessed the situation... I mean, their vantagepoint was so bad that I had to have looked about 2-3 inches smaller than I am. Guilt is a real SOB, let me tell you.
Posted by: Wine-aholic at September 09, 2005 02:07 PM (Wsn+K)
2
The neighborhood association wanted a 'traditional' Santa Claus..........
5
Nothing wrong with posting pictures of your member, but looking at pics of other guys' members is strictly verboten! That is, unless there's a hottie involved, but be sure not to meat-gaze too long.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 09, 2005 10:22 PM (0yYS2)
6
Jeff Harell forgot to mention/share he is laying another persons wife. Nevermind the fact, contributing to the breakup of a family. I dont see the humour at all in any of this. Don't you bloggers have any ethics?
Posted by: doesjeffy'sjunkwork? at September 10, 2005 03:58 AM (lZDDX)
7
FYI to readers ... the commenter "doesjeffysjunkwork" has posted the same comment at both Beth's and my blogs.
Draw your own conclusion on just who this commenter may be who considers a "wife" a piece of owned property and how that might justify criminal stalking.
Posted by: Darleen at September 10, 2005 01:32 PM (FgfaV)
Posted by: Collin Baber at April 12, 2005 09:29 PM (FV4oJ)
3
I don't know who Gannon is and this is probably a joke post but they are - we are protecting the western border between Syria and Iraq so no more people can pass through. It's where they have Al Zarqawi bogged down.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at April 13, 2005 10:41 AM (PEKrh)
Leftist Bloggers ask the IMPORTANT Questions: Is Ken Mehlman Gay?Raw story:
GQ Magazine details the outing campaign of gay blogger Mike Rogers (also editor of RawStoryQ) in a 3,100 word spread in this month’s issue, now on newsstands in New York and Los Angeles, RAW STORY has learned.
The piece, which includes a first-ever denial that the chairman of the Republican National Committee Ken Mehlman is gay–a fact contested by many reporters and others close to the Mehlman himself–is sure to spark a new firestorm of debate over whether outing those who oppose gay civil rights is appropriate.
“Ken Mehlman is not gay,†Steve Schmidt, a senior official of the Bush campaign and a friend of Mehlman’s told Jake Tapper, an ABC News correspondent who wrote the piece for the magazine. Scmidt who refers to Rogers as a “bottom dweller.â€
Mehlman has not responded to previous requests for comment on his sexuality from any publication.
RAW STORY previously reported that during the Republican National Convention in New York, Schmidt intimidated two New York newspapers from printing a story questioning Mehlman’s sexuality. Schmidt also allegedly called the sources that had spoken to Mike Rogers, who had been ready to go on the record about their experiences with the then-Bush-Cheney campaign manager. Mehlman was also outed by a progressive radio talk show host late last year.
AmericaBLOG’s John Aravosis, who is gay and publicly questioned whether Mehlman might be gay last year, said he was surprised a Bush campaign official would deny Mehlman was gay.
“If he’s now heterosexual, I’d like to know why he’s single at 38,†Aravosis told RAW STORY. “Because we’ve heard nothing about girlfriends, we’ve heard nothing about marriage, we’ve heard nothing about nothing–and he’s bashing [us] about gay marriage? Because he doesn’t seem like much of a defender of marriage himself.â€
That's not the way Ann Coulter tells it!
I wonder if John Aravosis will publish photos of Ken Mehlman's C*CK? Cause, you know, there's nothing that settles the Social Security reform debate better than a nine-inch Republican MAN-SHAFT.
After all, we can’t let these Republicans escape the hypocrisy of their private sexual lives. Your political leanings absolutely must hinge upon your choice in sexual partners.
Indeed. Do you think it's time to break out the Gannon-bell again??
1
I always did think I did a good Goldstein. Actually I didn't even realize I was sounding like him. I think I've just read (and laughed) at his posts so much its ingrained now.
Anyway, its so funny how the gay witch hunters on the left all hide behind Aravosis when they're doing some GOP gay bashing. Its as though they think the fact that Aravosis is gay some how makes the fact that they're persecuting their gay political opponents A-OK.
Posted by: actus at March 20, 2005 10:58 PM (5Lqt9)
7
Ken Mehlman put the Log in "Log Cabin Republicans". I think history is repeating itself. The German Nazis were full of closet homos. That goose stepping was a dead give away.
Now gays have "deep penetrance" in the neoconservative movement. Everything has to be so orderly for them.
Posted by: greg at March 22, 2005 08:26 AM (/+dAV)
Jeff Gannon Was Real Journalist
I'm tired of disproving the lies of a lady who claims we nuked Iraq (you know, Giulana Sgrena). I'm thinking that maybe what this blog needs is some more Jeff Gannon? Confederate Yankee has more. I apologize in advance over his lack of nude pictures.
4
And the cheese doodles color never comes out of the carpet.
Posted by: Robin Roberts at March 11, 2005 08:44 PM (xauGB)
5
The best argument against gannon is the one that congress gave when it rejected his accreditation: he wasn't paid to be a journalist, and the organization that paid him didn't make its money from advertising or subscriptions.
Posted by: actus at March 11, 2005 11:43 PM (5Lqt9)
$10,000 Reward Offered for Proof Helen Thomas Slept With Eleanor Roosevelt: A counter-factual analysis
No, not really. But now that the left-wing-it's-not-about-gay-sex-blogosphere has offered a $10,000 reward for any physical evidence that would prove Jeff Gannon / James Guckert slept with adminstration officials I just thought we'd play a little hard ball too.
Too low-brow you say?
Ok. Since women obviously don't produce the kind of DNA evidence the left is searching for we'll have to settle for a good old fashion counter-factual analysis.
Counter-factual analysis?
Sorry. Forgot to take off my methodology hat.
Counter-factual analysis is when we compare what actually happened to what would have happened if one variable was changed.
For instance, had Hitler (no, not Bush-Hitler, the real one) decided not to order the Luftwaffe to stop bombing the port at Dunkirk we might imagine that England would have been forced to capitulate soon after the Battle of Brittain was launched.
That is counter-factual analysis.
The Soros funded Media Matters blogosphere crowd keeps making this counter-factual claim, or something like it: Had Jeff Gannon been a Democratic partisan during the Clinton administration you know this would have turned into a major scandal.
Maybe or maybe not. Just as in the same way we cannot know that if the Nazis had cut off the retreating British at Dunkirk what the final outcome of the war would have been, we cannot really know what the reaction would have been if had the Jeff Gannon affair happened during the Clinton administration.
But what the left is missing here is that the Jeff Gannon affair, or something quite like it, may have already happened and it may have happened during the Clinton Administration. In fact, how do we know that it did not? The only reason that we know so much about Jeff Gannon is that the left blogosphere has placed his life under a microscope.
Have they bothered to put Helen Thomas's life under that same microscope?
John Hawkins does a bang-up job in this post of comparing Helen Thomas's 'thoughtful, provocative, and non-partisan' questions to Jeff Gannon's alleged soft-balls.
Read all of the Helen Thomas quotes. If this is how the objective non-partisan media acts, then give me the partisan media any day. At least with the partisan media you know where they are coming from. There is no illusion of neutrality.
Hawkins ends the comparison with this bit of advice that I reprint for you. Willis, Atrios, and Kos would do well to heed it:
Of course, Thomas hasn't been accused of any sexual misconduct, but how would anyone know unless Helen Thomas' sex life is given the same exacting scrutiny that Jeff Gannon's was? Is it possible that Thomas might be a lesbian? Could she have worked for an escort service on the side? Has she ever had an affair with a married man? Most conservatives, myself included, don't think those are relevant questions to ask of reporters, but since the left doesn't seem to share our opinion, perhaps there's an intrepid liberal blogger out there who wants to dig into Helen Thomas' sex life? Just look at the traffic that has been generated on the left by dragging Gannon's sex life through the mud -- who's to say it would be any different with Thomas?
Let me close with a warning that bloggers on the left should take to heart: the precedent you are setting by dragging a minor media figure's sex life (and even rumors about his sex life) into the public domain may come back and bite you. After all, if it becomes accepted that Jeff Gannon's sex life is fair game, then why wouldn't the sex life of major media figures or even big name bloggers be fair game as well? Let's hope that the left side of the blogosphere -- in a desperate attempt to keep a small, insignificant scandal alive -- has not created a "Gannon Standard" that will be used to justify this sort of public sliming for years to come. [READ THE WHOLE THING]
Despite the MSM defense of this little terrorist, not a single one of the Wahabbis prosecuted in Northern Virginia in recent years have been acquitted. Indeed, all have pleaded guilty to federal felonies with serious jailtime attached.
From money laundering to plotting terrorist acts to supporting terrorist organizations, there has been not a single - not one - spirited defense offered by anyone charged to date. That's a revealing contrast to the whining and moaning by the Muslim PR hounds of Northern Virginia.
As for Abu Ali, I expect him to meet the same fate despite the handwringing of the MSM and all of the Muslim/Wahabbi "advocacy" groups.
The MSM is particularly irresponsible in failing to note that many countries beyond Saudi Arabia may legally detain suspected terrorists for periods of up to two years, just as they did with Abu Ali: France for one (which promptly jailed several recent Gitmo releasees on suspicion); and Thailand, Singapore, and Indonesia come to mind.
Posted by: Penguin43 at February 27, 2005 06:18 AM (s5uPT)
9
A tryst with HT would be a coyote V. Otherwise, HT looks like a ER clone. Her more genuine love interest would seem to be Janet Reno.
Posted by: RichinJapan at February 27, 2005 11:44 PM (PXsv4)
10
Janet Reno? Yuk. Must have been a Clinton appointee.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 01, 2005 10:51 PM (CBNGy)