How does one send a message to a jailed terrorist? Easy, you send him greetings via the radio. At least, that is how the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed would like you to do it.
It seems that there is a radio show in the UK called Radio Ramadhan in which the messages are being sent. A webpage run by Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama'ah--what Bakri Mohammed's followers are calling themselves these days--encourages Muslims to send messages:
YOU CAN SEND MESSAGES TO THE BROTHERS IN BELMARSH [prison] VIA RAMADHAN RADIO TO WHICH THEY ALL LISTEN EVERY NIGHT. THE NUMBER IS 07907 222 531. THE NUMBER HAS BEEN TESTED AND THE MESSAGES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED IN BELMARSH [prison] ALHAMDULILLAH.
YOU CAN ALSO TEXT THE RADIO STATION.
PLEASE DO NOT FORGET THE MUSLIMS BEHIND BARS IN YOUR DU’AAS [prayers].
Members of the group of 'captives' include those involved in a well publicized demonstration outside of the Danish embassy in London: Mizanur Rahman, infamous for holding a sign saying, "Behead those who insult Islam"; Abdul Rahman Saleem (the website even has some of his poetry from jail) who yelled, "Europe you will pay with your blood" and who justified the murder of Kenneth Bigley; Umran Javed who yelled "Bomb, bomb Denmark. Bomb, bomb USA"; Abdul Muhid, who led the demonstration and said "Bomb, bomb the UK" and waved placards with slogans such as "Annihilate those who insult Islam"; Abu Izzadeen, the leader of the group who once claimed "Terrorism is part and parcel to Islam. Terrorism is part of the deen [Islamic way of life] of Islam"; and many, many more.
We know messages are being sent in to the jihadis via radio, and we also know that letters are coming out of jail from the jihadis----am I the only one that thinks this is troubling?
Posted by: Rusty at
12:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 302 words, total size 2 kb.
Video: Bakri Mohammed Followers Threaten Beckham, Timberlake, Usher?Howie e-mailed this story earlier this morning (another story here) which claims a new video threatens soccer superstars David Beckham, Wayne Rooney and Thierry Henry. The video is also said to threaten singers Justin Timberlake, Usher, M&M, and P. Diddy.
The story says the video was posted at Youtube by "a Glasgow-based website named after Al-Qaeda that encourages attacks on Westerners."
I immediately knew what website they were talking about and who was behind the video. The website is that of the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed, Islam Base. "Base" in Arabic is "qaeda".
The website, which is run by the followers of the exiled radical cleric, was once registered to one of Britain's largest Islamic houses of worship, the Birmingham Central Mosque. After we exposed the connection, the website changed its registration to an address in Glasgow, Scotland.
Coincidence or not, that change in registration came only shortly before a cell of al Qaeda in Iraq linked doctors carried out acts of terror in Glasgow and London.
Several groups led by Bakri Mohammed were banned by the British government, but each time they ban a group the same followers simply form a new one. They now call themselves the followers of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah.
While the video is not up at the group's Youtube channel, it is up at their official website as an embedded Youtube video. I've posted the video below.
Another one of dujanah's subscribers is AbuMarwan23 who uses an image of Osama bin Laden as an avatar.
This story goes so far as to say that the celebrities shown in the video "are the targets of an alleged Al-Qaeda murder plot." Neil Doyle apparently believes that the video may be a prelude to setting up the soccer stars as potential al Qaeda targets. He cites the fact that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad has admitted that al Qaeda had plans to attack the World Cup in 2002.
After viewing the video, though, it seems less like a threat against the famous (as the story suggested) than a warning to Muslim youth not to follow the example of the famous. For instance, they call 2Pac Shakur "the follower of Satan" and say Snoop Dogg is "among the wrongdoers".
Hmmmm, for once they may have a point. I'm not sure about the hell part, but I'm pretty sure I don't want anyone's kids following the example of today's celebrities.
Neil may be right in his analysis of the video, but he cites the images of graves, for instance, as an implicit threat. However, given the context of the sermon, it seems to me that the grave images are simply a reminder to the target audience that everyone will eventually die and then a day of judgment will come.
I have no doubt that the Salafis who are behind the sermon would love to put Justin Timberlake to death-- sex outside of marriage is punishable by the death penalty under their desired version of Islamic law-- but I don't see this video as an overt death threat.
I hate to be put in the position of defending Omar Bakri Mohammed's minions, but they are guilty of far worse and of threatening a lot of other people--including the Pope! And there's also no doubt that they support al Qaeda--they named their website after bin Laden's group after all--and as such they are the enemy.
So, Posh Spice's hubby is safe--for now. At least until the Islamists come to power. After that, all bets are off.
Public vs Private Face of Omar Bakri Mohammed: "Peace" vs. "Hooray al Qaeda!"This IHT report, also published in the New York Times, portrays Omar Bakri Mohammed as a man who has moderated his views and who is trying to promote peace between the Lebanese government and the al Qaeda linked Fatah al Islam fighters holed up in Palestinian villages. I was stunned, literally stunned, when I read that Bakri Mahammed was actually promoting himself as a peacemaker between the two sides. He further had the audacity to advise clerics not to say that the Lebanese Army was an apostate force. As AllahP put it in his link to it yesterday, whitewash -- indeed.
Why? Because I have an audio of Omar Bakri Mohammed recorded around the time that the IHT report cites him as trying to mediate the conflict between Fatah al Islam and the Lebanese government, May 20th. In the audio sent to me by Glen Jenvey a few days after that, Bakri Mohammed is heard claiming that the Lebanese government was "attacking Muslims" and that al Qaeda in Lebanon and Fatah al Islam represented "true Muslims".
Jenvey has dozens and dozens of these recordings, many of them the source for stories published in the British press, so I have no idea why Bakri Mohammed doesn't watch his tongue when he has his little online chats with his followers in Britain like he does when he's talking to reporters.
This year he opened a public library, equipped with computers and Islamic texts, in addition to a lecture hall where he preaches. He also travels to various mosques.
Bakri has grown more rotund, less bellicose and more tactful to those of other faiths.
Bakri Mohammed to his followers in private:
So we don't know yet what going to be the response of al Qaeda's message, because he was very tough. Al Qaeda's message declared takfir [unbelievers], obviously on the Lebanese Army.
He declared condemnation on the head of the Christian Bishop in Lebanon, like the Pope of the Christians, he condemn him physically, and condemn him verbally and said to him, "If you do not stop this Lebanese Army from killing our brothers and our sisters we are going to start launching bombing operations all over Lebanon. And we're going to drive all the Crusaders out." ...[followed by a prayer, by Bakri Mohammed, for Muslim victory]
No condemnation of al Qaeda's message, only a prayer in support of them.
Bakri Mohammed in the IHT:
Bakri says that the violence was needless and that it violated Islam. He has worked to prod clerics in the area to persuade Fatah al Islam to end the confrontation.
"They keep saying the army is a force of apostates," Bakri said of Fatah al Islam. "We say, both of you, sort it out between you, but don't you dare try to apply the case of Iraq here."
Here is Bakri Mohammed in private:
But somehow, I think the Lebanese Army has breeched the truce. ...
It was their own advance warning, and when nobody take them [Fatah al Islam] seriously they take over, and there is a big fight, and obviously the Lebanese casualties beyond the imagination. But when they [Lebanese Army] start to lose so many so-called "chocolate Muslims", so-called Sunnimuhaji, and the muftis, and the others [inaudible] who have not to do with Islam, nothing to do with this nothing to do with that....
Bearing in mind many people stand together from the Palestinians and from the so-called Sunni Muslims against Fatah al-Islam. And unfortunately people denounce them. And they [Fatah al Islam] are true practice Muslims. Through their own sharia courts, that is all of them have the Koran, have the Hadith [sayings of Mohammed]....
Some of them are from students of [Arabic], these were known scholars of supporting al Qaeda, and his students from al Qassim, and from Berada, they came there [Lebanon] and some people came from Iraq and joined them [Fatah al Islam] and some people came from Yemen and joined them. Some people inside the camp from Bangladesh as well.
Yup, supporting al Qaeda in Lebanon and an al Qaeda linked group, Fatah al Islam, against the Lebanese Army. Sounds like he's really moderated to me.
The reason I didn't publish this conversation previously is because this recording is so absolutely damning of Bakri Mohammed that I thought it best to pass it along to law enforcement in Lebanon. So, I sent it to Michael Totten to see if he could pass it along to his contacts there. We talked about maybe running a story together on it, but unfortunately both of us got distracted by other pressing matter. Totten is back in Iraq, I had kid #4, and then simply forgot about the recording. Until I saw the IHT piece, which AllahP knew would goad me into writing something. Well, he was right.
A more complete, yet still partial transcript below. Unfortunately even as an MP3 the audio file is still over a megabyte, so I don't have the bandwidth to host it. Hopefully Charles will find the time between debugging to put it up.Charles has put up the audio of Bakri Muhammad here. But since Bakri Mohammed claims he's being taken out of context when people claim he supports al Qaeda, I'll make the audio available to any one that wants it. If anything, the complete audio makes him look even worse.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
12:49 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1597 words, total size 11 kb.
Muslim Cartoon Protesters JailedFour of the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed have been jailed in Britain for their role in attempting to incite violence at a protest over cartoons depicting Mohammed.
Mizanur Rahman, 24, Umran Javed, 27, and Abdul Muhid, 24, were each jailed for six years for soliciting to murder after telling a crowd to bomb the UK.
A fourth man, Abdul Saleem, 32, was jailed for four years for stirring up racial hatred at the protest in 2006....
Rahman, from Palmers Green, north London, was filmed at the rally talking over a loudspeaker and calling for UK soldiers to be brought back from Iraq in body bags.
He said: "We want to see their blood running in the streets of Baghdad.
"We want to see the Mujahideen shoot down their planes the way we shoot down birds. We want to see their tanks burn in the way we burn their flags."
Javed, from Birmingham, was filmed by police shouting: "Bomb, bomb Denmark. Bomb, bomb USA."...
Saleem, from Poplar, east London, chanted, "7/7 on its way" and "Europe, you will pay with your blood".
Finally, Abdul Muhid, 24, said to be the leader of the demonstration, chanted "Bomb, bomb the UK" and waved placards with slogans such as "Annihilate those who insult Islam".
The four claimed they weren't in charge of the protest and were just shouting what they were told to shout. So, who was behind the protest? Omar Bakri Mohammed, and his lieutenants Anjem Choudary and Abu Izadeen, of course.
His followers at U.K. Captive Support are calling the four convicted men "hostages" and were behind today's protest in front of London's Old Bailey. Here is the flyer they've been distributing online.
To end this post on a positive note: the same group has a branch in New York City called The Islamic Thinkers Society. Isn't it great to know that bunch of al Qaeda supporters are walking around the streets of NYC? Freedom, baby!
Hitchens: The London car-bomb plot was designed to kill women
I always try to take a minute to read Mr. Hitchens. Note that name pops up again, Anjem Choudary.
Via Slate: Only at the tail end of the coverage was it admitted that a car bomb might have been parked outside a club in Piccadilly because it was "ladies night" and that this explosion might have been designed to lure people into to the street... ... Since we have known since 2004 that a near-identical attack on a club called the Ministry of Sound was proposed in just these terms, on the grounds that dead "slags" or "sluts" would be regretted by nobody.
I suppose that some people might want to shy away from this conclusion for whatever reason, but they cannot have been among the viewers of British Channel 4's recent Undercover Mosque, or among those who watched Sunday's report from Christiane Amanpour on CNN's Special Investigations Unit. On these shows, the British Muslim fanatics came right out with their program. Straight into the camera, leading figures like Anjem Choudary spoke of their love for Osama Bin Laden and their explicit rejection of any definition of Islam as a religion of peace. On tape or in person, mullahs in prominent British mosques called for the killing of Indians and Jews.
Update: Missed the link on this post. My bad. apologies.
more...
JERUSALEM – The thwarted car bombings in London last week and the terror attack against Scotland's busiest airport were "completely justified" and likely the beginning of many more attacks in Britain, a prominent UK Islamist leader connected to terror supporting groups told WND yesterday.
"There is no doubt whatsoever that there will continue to be attacks against the British government, its interests and the home front as long as we see the continued British and American occupation of Muslim land in Iraq and Afghanistan, support for criminal Israel, and draconian measures taken against Muslims in the UK," said Anjem Choudary, founder and former chief of two Islamic groups disbanded by the British authorities under antiterror legislation.
"A war is being waged against Muslims on every level. There are many in Britain who take their ideology from Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida and are ready to carry out many more attacks," Choudary said.
When I read that Rusty Humphries (who loves TJR by the way) was at last week's protest I emailed him and asked about what he saw there. Mr. Humphries emailed us some images and audio. I've wrapped them up into a single file and uploaded them to Google Video.
Mr. Humphries spoke to me about the possible connection between the knighthood of Sir Salman Rushdie and last week's failed bombings. He was worried no one was making the connection.
While I'm sure that provides some motivation for the attacks there has been chatter about possible attacks in Britain since late May. As you can hear in the audio above al-Qaeda and their supporters have many many so called justifications and motivations to kill us.
I feel the Sir Rushdie affair is just one of these. It may have changed the timing or possibly caused the attacks to by rushed out of anger. In all likelyhood attacks would be carried out regardless of his knighting. Mullah Dadullah called for renewed attacks on Britain well before Sir Rushdie was knighted.
They will scream about Rushdie to try and cast blame, to attempt to make us feel the bombings are our own fault. If not Sir Rushdie, they would think of another reason to blame us for their actions.
Also of note is the fact that although a British Muslim leader has said it is the duty of very British citizen to, "report suspected terrorists." These people do not consider themselves British citizens. They consider Muslims and Brits as seperate and do not recognize the authority of the UK government over them. They only recognize Britain's Shariah Islamic court which is led by Choudary.
The Central London Mosque is a favorite of Abu Izzadeen and where Omar The Goat Humping Bakri Muhammad preached his hate before fleeing the UK. More background below the fold.
though many British extremists are angered by the deaths of fellow Muslim across the world, what drove me and many others to plot acts of extreme terror within Britain and abroad was a sense that we were fighting for the creation of a revolutionary worldwide Islamic state that would dispense Islamic justice.
Islamist Private Moments Revealed
Yet another in the long saga of what they say in public vs. what they say in private. At a password protected forum run by Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah, the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed in Britain.
The files they swap:
"Knights under the Prophet's Banner by Dr. Ayman al Zawahiri"
Who they pray for:
"Oh Allah, give help and a sweeping victory for the Mujahidin in [Lebanon]"--from a post about the al Qaeda linked Fatah al Islam.
The photos they share:
Tender moments in the lives of Fatah al Islam fighters in Lebanon.
Is that not reserved for Christians from the middle ages?
Posted by: Dan at May 26, 2007 12:56 PM (ILHet)
2
Must be a typo. Knights conjur up images of chivalry, honour, bravery and just causes. Or in other words, the antithesis of these constume-wearing pricks.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at May 26, 2007 01:38 PM (ucbQf)
3
I'm waiting for the jackoffs in the pics to break out into Kum Bah Yah.
4
The islamopithecines are muy macho. Look at the rifles they use as props (just like in every photo they pose for.) The hoods used to conceal their identities (and ugly mugs) likewise exude machismo.
I'm terrified of the mighty warriors of islam. (Snort!)
Posted by: muhammad Wasa Fuquad at May 26, 2007 06:40 PM (P6kNY)
5
"Next, Achmed, you slowly fold in the egg whites with the asparagus cream you previously set aside......"
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at May 26, 2007 07:17 PM (K/lgF)
6
Oh Allah, give me the strength to piss on 1000 mulims. And the beer.
Posted by: Greyrooster at May 26, 2007 09:33 PM (C0kWU)
1
"British regimes campaign of oppression on muslim women," so sayeth the masked clad muslim women forced to conceal themselves out of "modesty". Crazy! This is crazy! I'm cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs!
Posted by: DrTheopolis at May 01, 2007 04:31 PM (9ZqGe)
If so, the Brit government is doing them a favour by forcing them to join the civilized world and learn to read and write and spell properly.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at May 01, 2007 04:37 PM (j97MF)
3
I believe these women are terrified to speak their mind otherwise they would be subject to stoning. I would suggest they ban together but with the current state of affairs in the UK they have no choice than to carry these stupid signs. It is a sad state of affairs that women are subject to this idiosity.
Posted by: allahakchew at May 01, 2007 04:40 PM (BrndJ)
4
Jack Straw - bent over backwards to disproportionately accomodate an unneeded minority.
Jack Straw - sick to the back teeth of all the perpetual pissing and moaning over nothing.
Jack Straw - typical British citizen.
In his youth, Jack Straw was somewhat of a Socialist, and you begin to wonder how somebody can change their political affiliation so significantly. In his case from being far-left to centrist. And then you see something like this and it becomes perfectly clear. Really - you can't make this shit up.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at May 01, 2007 04:44 PM (O1raF)
5
The hijab is every womans right, so put it on bitch, if you know what's good for you.
Posted by: Omar Bakri Muhammad at May 01, 2007 04:56 PM (YHZAl)
6
Ya gotta love the veil, all women should wear them...
absurd thought - God of the Universe cares what women wear
on this microbe called Earth a matter most important .
Posted by: USpace at May 01, 2007 06:45 PM (zH7OF)
7
Must be hard on guys picking up muslim chicks. Spend half the night. Buy her dinner. Remove her veil and find out your dog wouldn't do her. Still that might not be as bad as San Francisco. Remove her dress and find she packing more than you. Now what would really be bad would be picking up a muslim chick in San Francisco and discovering she's not only is ugly but packs more than you.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 01, 2007 09:46 PM (pW/bR)
8
Burquas are burn worthy, IMO. Damn their pheremone superstitions!
Posted by: greyrooster at May 01, 2007 11:22 PM (8z37R)
10
Wait... they're Muslims... I thought those were Ninja babes. Damn. I even had a couple of lines I wanted to use on them, "These aren't nunchakus in my pocket, I'm just happy to see you," or, "You want to show me how you use that blowgun."
Posted by: DrTheopolis at May 02, 2007 10:42 AM (9ZqGe)
11
Why are these two cowards wearing those masks why dont they want their faces seen? are they afraid if someone saw them they would end up dead?
Posted by: sandpiper at May 02, 2007 03:50 PM (vnSBY)
14
Apparently I'm an idiot.
Rusty, I have no idea where I left the comment, but I just wanted to let you know I stole your pic and posted it here: http://pereiraville.com/scribble/?p=3112
With proper attribution and link, of course.
Video: Omar Bakri Mohammed -- al Qaeda Connection
Yeah, I know it's beating a dead horse, but this time it's the BBC that noticed the connection. If you watch closely, you'll see that some of the video is from Glen Jenvey, which premiered right here months before the Beebs. Importance of the BBC report? People are learning. LGF has the video.
1
What? Signs of intelligent life at the BBC? Say it ain't so...
Posted by: DrTheopolis at May 01, 2007 11:31 AM (9ZqGe)
2
I will comment to humor you "John Doe". Seriously, good job keeping tabs on this bullshit. The more people learn the better it is, with a small note...will they understand"?
Posted by: allahakchew at May 01, 2007 04:56 PM (BrndJ)
3
Allahcuntchew: Jes figured what you is. Your husband wear a dress to. Or is it your wife. Rosie turns you on, huh.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 01, 2007 11:30 PM (8z37R)
4
Understanding is in the mind, knowing is in the heart.
Posted by: DrTheopolis at May 02, 2007 10:35 AM (9ZqGe)
Abu Izzadeen Remanded, 2 Others Get Bail (Jawa Scoops MSM...AGAIN!)
A) Abu Izzadeen, three other Bakri Mohammed followers, didn't make bail. Bwahahahahahaaaaaaaaa!!!
This isn't cowbell as in, "Osama bin Laden is dead" cowbell. This is more like in your face cowbell now that we know friends of Izzadeen read this blog regularly. I'm looking at you Anjem Choudary, and the rest of you Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah followers. We know who you are, and you are my bitches.
B) Two others charged back walking the streets. Scary.
B) MSM finally releasing name of six detained in raid....five days after Jawa Report!
more...
Posted by: Chris Allen at April 30, 2007 05:35 PM (mGSdZ)
4
Now they can keep an eye on the ones released on bail until they plan something - which they inevitably will; what else are they going to do, lead a normal, contructive life? get the fuck out of here! - and then put them in jail for something major. Good stuff. This is what all the CCTV cameras are for; to keep an eye on the terrorists.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 30, 2007 05:38 PM (BEY7y)
Posted by: Good Lt at April 30, 2007 06:33 PM (yMbfY)
7
Really appreciate what you do to these assholes, Rusty. Its the next best thing to killing them.
Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at April 30, 2007 06:42 PM (ou0cx)
8
Oh man they will have too poop in the direction of mecca! What a outrage. Sarc/
Posted by: Legrand at April 30, 2007 07:23 PM (/etUv)
9
This is glorius news of course. I have only one complaint, and it is a persistent one, and I generally keep it to myself ... however , Why don't these assholes have names that are easier to pronounce? Can we get an asshole to English pronounciation guide anywhere so I can get better at saying terrorist names when I make fun of them? Speaking of which ... where IS Team America in all of this?
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at April 30, 2007 08:03 PM (2OHpj)
The Omar Bakri Mohammed -- al Muhajiroun -- al Qaeda Connection
Two posts of note, both of them connecting Omar Bakri Mohammed -- through the organization he founded, al Muhajiroun -- to planned acts of terror on British soil and to al Qaeda. Both of them are about the five Muslims convicted today of plotting to use a fertilizer bomb to kill British civilians.
the home-grown terrorists springing up across this country are not acting alone. Al Muhajiroun is radicalising them and sending them on their way to Al Qaeda and terrorism
Not only was the leader involved in Al-Qaeda, he was also involved in a banned group— Al-Muhajiroun, darling of Allah’s little terror-supporting buddy Abu Izzadeen.
And to think, these guys have the nerve to claim that we have no evidence that they are al Qaeda supporters!
Posted by: DrTheopolis at April 30, 2007 03:23 PM (9ZqGe)
3
problem is, you cant prove its not a plot. If theyre guilty then i say bring back hanging, but then how many injustices did the ira incur in our courts?
Posted by: jamal at April 30, 2007 03:58 PM (XMQIF)
Posted by: jamal at April 30, 2007 03:58 PM (XMQIF)
5
Right, a conspiracy against some backwards, genocidal nuts to make it seem like Islam is a medieval death-cult so we can invade some fifth-world, primitive shithole (aka. Islamnic country) at great personal expense in both terms of money and lives and then...well, that's the clincher isn't it? What's the latest feat of imagination in the Truther crowd these days? Stealing oil? Jeez, I hope not; I've seen insects that could come up with less outlandish ideas.
Conspiracy? Hmm, maybe. I believe I'll give the benefit of the doubt to the police, intelligence services, professionals and sane people on this one, rather than some shiteaters who devote their pointless lives to studying, verbatim, the utterings of some illiterate, woman-beating, child-molesting, mass-murdering lowlife who invented - largely through plagiarising the other two big and popular ones at the time - a religion in order to firstly justify his degenerate behaviour, and secondly to garner support for even more outrageous behaviour with promises of a magical afterlife that a sex-criminal couldn't top, who would love nothing more than to bring about our violent deaths.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 30, 2007 04:22 PM (BEY7y)
6
Of course they would deny being al Qaeda supporters. On one of the earlier links you gave on this they have their names & biographies. Seems like two of them were converts to Islam. I still can't see in any reasonable persons mind to convert to radical Islam. I feel the converts are natural born criminals and it sure as hell looks like we have a hell of alot of them out there. OT but on a current subject of posters on here. Some are sock-puppets and some are not. Other sites have had the same problem such as Jihad Watch and LGF. LGF has the ability to delete such comments but not before they are recorded. Jihad Watch and Jawa are stuck with the commentors. We know greyrooster is a racist as he such states but the others///John Ryan, etc. are plants. They try to feed greyrooster but he doesn't fall for it (sometimes). People feel the way they do and shouldn't be stopped from commenting no matter how discusting the comments are. Others can put them down and have. It is interesting the comments site on the UK site are closed and not accepting comments....What are they afraid of??
Posted by: allahakchew at April 30, 2007 05:00 PM (BrndJ)
7
My comments are not as disgusting as you pea sized brain. You stringy headed ho.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 08:46 PM (3o7Jc)
Omar Bakri Mohammed Followers Screed Against Jawa Report
As many of you know, we have have been documenting the ties between Omar Bakri Mohammed and his followers (all former members of banned groups: ie, al Muhajiroun, The Saved Sect, al Ghurabaa, etc) and terrorism for some time now. We've finally made it on to their radar screen!
*Rusty bows, pats self on back*
Okay, maybe finally isn't entirely accurate. Actually, they've noticed us on several occasion in the past. But until I get an overt fatwa ordering my beheading from Bakri Mohammed, rather than the usual veiled death threat from his followers, I promise that I will not rest!
Today's latest screed from one of Bakri's terror supporters tries to document the ties between The Jawa Report and racism. Their evidence? Comments left by racist genocidal pigs here at The Jawa Report.
They're right. There are such comments on these pages. Some of them are racist. Some of them are genocidal. All are disgusting. Although I've never quite got how disgusting genocidal comments about Muslims were racist--since last time I checked, "Muslim" wasn't a "race".
Such comments are sometimes left by a very small group of people who we've tried to ban on dozens of occasions, and who we have publicly denounced. But the vast majority of them are from the one-time commenter who leaves a few unintelligible remarks and who we never really hear from again---thankfully! Unfortunately, the tools we use to publish this website are not adequate to the task. I'd love to have comment registration, but I don't.
Anyway, here is what Bakri Mohammed's followers over at U.K. Captive Support have to say about The Jawa Report, in a lengthier post about how Britain has declared war on Muslims:
An example to this is the mypetjawa website which has continuously boasted about their so-called intelligence in tracking down Muslims who call for the beheadings of non-Muslims. The website owners are obviously lying hypocritical pigs, as they allow comments from non-Muslims to call for the same.
We do not specifically allow comments from such people. Our only tool available would be to disallaow all comments. Something I've discussed at length with my fellow authors, and which all agree is not a good idea.
The website has always falsely portrayed the Muslims as people who have nothing else to do other then to terrorise the non-Muslims. These false claims have never been backed with evidence.
A common tactic by the al Muhajiroun goons: portray attacks against those who support terrorism as attacks against all Muslims. Thus, when we provide evidence that Omar Bakri Mohammed, Abu Izzadeen, and other British Islamists formerly affiliated with al Muhajiroun do, in fact, support al Qaeda, they claim we are "attacking Muslims".
In Islaam nothing can be claimed without evidence. Therefore we have pasted the links to racist comments calling for the beheadings of Muslims, Arabs and Persians. They also call for the slaughter of Arab and Persian Women and Children:
These are only 3 examples of the many we have collected.
Ending with a message to those who have waged a war against Islaam and Muslims: Know that Islaam has a history of victory, and a future of victory. And by Allaah you will all witness it Insha’Allah.
I take that last sentence as a veiled threat. But no matter. What matters is the accusation that, somehow, because we have a single racist jerk who left comments on a single thread and was nearly unanimously shouted down by other regular commenters, that it somehow discredits this publication, and the literally dozens of documented occasions in which Omar Bakri Mohammed has personally supported acts of terror and in which his websites---not just the words of an odd commenter or two---have encouraged terror.
You'll notice that I left my own comments in the thread cited, responding to the genocidal asshole Alan Jay Roberts:
Rusty:
between John Ryan and Greyrooster, and now John Allen [my bad, I meant to say "Alan Jay Roberts"]......
Serenity now. Serenity now. Serenity now.
In fact, I believe that Kafir and Kamchatka Bear may have been on to something since none of us had ever heard of "Allen Jay Roberts" until this post. Kamchatka Bear, on reading Alan Jay Robertson's comments and Kafir's allusion to sock puppetry, said:
Alan are you trying to sock puppet here so that later you can claim that this site is racist? if so it's pretty pathetic
Eerie how accurate Kamchatka Bear's prediction was.........
Posted by: Rubin at April 30, 2007 12:11 PM (ASeeo)
2
Besides Alan Jay there have been other post the last month or so that have different names but it always sounds like the exact same guy.
Posted by: Randman at April 30, 2007 12:20 PM (Sal3J)
3
Dr. Rusty congratulations! You have apparently ticked off a major propogandist. As far as the suspicions on sock puppeting... there are a couple of things that normally give islamists away. 1) weird names: ok think of "Alan Jay Roberts". How many bloggers will post their name in detail? Internet jihadists strive to create illusion of
authentisity, so that they will come up with very interesting names like: "Real French girl", "real native american", "patriotic american soldier". You get the drift... it's "real". Now I am sure those british pislimes are reading this now also, (memo to them: you will join muhammed... bent over in hell next to him) so they might improve their names after this post, but unfortunately for them #2 will still remain the same. 2) jihadists (thankfully to the general "clarity" brought about hateful religion) normally write in a very confused, hateful, generalized terms. The ability to ration and logic in general must be a lot of time damaged when one converts. Hence a lot of times you'll be able to tell them by almost adolescent kind of mentality, (with a lot irrational hatred). Now this also goes for in person encounters with the retards. There are occasionally good bla bla blologists, but even then most likely in a couple of days you'll figure out that all their eloquent speeches really are summarized by hate and confusion (it's kind of like waking up after major boozing party and asking youself: " what was I thinking?"). I guess it all goes to prove one more time that the real God is the god of order, clarity and logic, as opposed to the wanna-be who had to torture and brainwash muhamed in order to convince him of his "divine" origin.
P.S.: question for the piglimes (based on your claim that "In Islaam nothing can be claimed without evidence"). Muhammed's validity is based on only one person's testimony about his "divine" encounters - HIS OWN. Maybe you should really take your own advice and be a little bit sceptical about the hater.
Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at April 30, 2007 12:41 PM (gtZwa)
4
P.S.: wow... that's a long rant. sorry about that.
Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at April 30, 2007 12:42 PM (gtZwa)
5
The difference being, of course, that people who call for or advocate genocide on this site are challenged. Whereas in Islamic circles, people who use that sort of rhetoric are clapped on the back and showered with plaudits (see: Palestinian Hate Syndrome). Basicallly, it's a small of example of the larger West versus Islam argument. One being good, modern, correct and rational, the other being Islam.
I think it's fair to say that since Islam hasn't managed to contribute anything other than murder, oppression, hatred and general weirdness, i.e. nothing positve or worth having, to humanity in around 1400 years, that it's not going to at all. How could it afterall, if Muslims spend all their time learning the useless fairytale nonsense scribbled down from the ramblings of an illiterate, woman-beating, mass-murdering, child-abusing shithead and congregate 5 times daily to get on their hands and knees with somebody's ass a few inches from their face and mutter incoherently to some invisible man, that was invented by aforementioned shithead to dupe gullible people into condoning and assisting in his degenerate behaviour? Not exactly conducive to progressivism. It's no problem though, we, the sane people will let the Islamic world piggyback of our progresses and prosperity as usual, but if it gets a little out of line, forgets its place - of grateful guest - then we'll have to slap it around a bit until it learns. It's for the best.
The good news is that people are finally cottoning on, realising that all that shit about the religion of peace' was all a cruel joke and beginning to pay attention to the problem. Look at all the arrests of these funny bearded assholes for example, and the tangiable shift in political outlook to the right.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 30, 2007 12:53 PM (810g3)
6
And a well-deserved pat on the shoulder it is too, Dr. Shackleford. :-)
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at April 30, 2007 12:57 PM (j97MF)
7"..The website has always falsely portrayed the Muslims as people who have
nothing else to do other then to terrorise the non-Muslims. These false
claims have never been backed with evidence..."
Never backed by evidence, eh? Does the fact that I'm an eye witness to precisely such barbarity and inhumanity and depraved indifference to human life shown by these savages count?
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at April 30, 2007 01:02 PM (j97MF)
Does he mean like how the 1.2 billion of them with their enormous oil wealth can not dislodge the tiniest of these democracies namely Israel?
Or does he mean how they turned back at the gates of Vienna?
Or how they were evicted from Spain?
Or how they lost the Malaisye war with Britain?
Or how the Turkish Califate was beaten and fragmented?
Do they mean these kinds of victories?
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at April 30, 2007 01:06 PM (j97MF)
10
Dr. Shackleford, If I may say so, please don't feel obliged to spend any energy trying explain the fact that the JAWA Report is not what these savages accuse it of being. Please note that these terrorsit f**k's are incurably affliced with verbal diarrhea.
I know for a fact that you're far more tolerant than I am.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at April 30, 2007 01:14 PM (j97MF)
11
I think by 'victories' he mean absolute failures. And I agree with him. Islam is a fucking joke. That's why everone spends so much time laughing at it and the poor gullible simpletons that follow it.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 30, 2007 01:17 PM (810g3)
12
Even the worst of our racist commenters here are only loud-mouthed jerks. They don't go around sawing off Muslim's heads and posting the videos on You Tube. They don't go around blowing up people that offend them. There is a big difference between some jerk letting off steam, and Omar the G-H Bakri Mohammed's followers issuing threats that have an excellent chance of being carried out.
Posted by: Vicki at April 30, 2007 01:28 PM (KNd6y)
13
Islam is a fucking joke until the weak attempt to excuse it under the guise "you poor picked on bunch" The racist say bad things about you bloodthisty son of a bitches. Aren't the racists terrible. We should concentrate on them not on you baby bombing mother fuckers. Yea sure. Muslims. You win on this one by default. Thank the brainwashed who refuse to accept the truth. I'm a racist. Racist against blacks because of their behavior. I defy anyone to proof anything I've said not to be the factual proof. The bullshit saying being repeated time, after time, after time, after time "muslims is not a race" Like the world hasn't known this for a 1000 years is old hat. Arabs are a race of people. Same as Jews are a race of people. The fact that some Jews are Christians doesn't change that fact. They're still Jews. If someone has a reason to be racist to the arabs that's their business. If someone is stupid enough to fall for the old "he called me a racist remark" therefore I should be forgiven all my crimes and everyone focus on his racist remarks is childs play. Sounds like a bunch of third graders. Personally, taking the Arabs behavior into accound I find it astonishing that we have so few anti-arab racists. REMEMBER THE ARABS. THE ONES DANCING IN THE STREETS AT THE DEATHS OF 3000 INNOCENT PEOPLE ON 9/11. But that's not important. Calling racist names at those dancing in the streets. Now thats important. KNOW WHAT! you sissies sure enough might lose.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 01:48 PM (4ytNJ)
14
Infidelsalwayswin: "People who use that kind of retoric are clapped on the back and applauded" EXCELLENT. How very few of the tear droppers on this blog notice that very fact. This closed mentality is why I say. Academia, the other Islam.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 01:55 PM (4ytNJ)
15
And Rusty: If their muslims yes kill them before they kill others. Iranian, Persian. Personally, my war is with Islam. And I really don't give a shit about the muslims relatives of some immigrant. Mean huh! But that's the way you defeat Islam. For 3 years I've listened to Rusty Shackelfor say everything except anything that would lead to an end to the muslim problem. SO NOW IS YOUR TIME.
Some say kill em. You say, no. Some say mass deportations back to their own Islamic world. You say, no. Some say nuke em. You say, no Some say OUTLAW ISLAM in the west. You say, no. Every solution that is practical is wrong to you. SO WHERE'S YOUR FRIGGIN IDEA? WHERE'S YOUR SOLUTION?And no I not going to kiss and hug a bunch of murderers.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 02:05 PM (4ytNJ)
16
To be clear, here, racism is hatred real or implied of another ethnic group. I'm sure thats not the best definition but it'll do. The KKK and Hitler's SS are typical examples of the personification of racial hatred against Blacks and Jews, respectively. Those who dislike followers of Islam are displaying not racism, but religious intolerance. It should be noted, however, that although the U.S. celebrates freedom of religion it does not also celebrate equivalency of religions. The United States was founded on Judeo-Christian values and it should never be implied that freedom of religion, as defined by the 1st Amendment, also extends to religous equality. I have yet to see a group advocating religious equality. Many religions practice religious tolerance but none, to my knowledge, claim to have religious equality as one of their tenants. Every religion is going to believe that their version of religious truth is better than the next. Perhaps I'm mistaken here, if so, please correct me. It should also be noted that when visiting or living in a country with a particular religious slant, especially where the religion might be ingrained or embedded in their legal system, you should respect that countries religious slant even if it chaps your hide to do so. I am not advocating any religion, nor am I giving a pass to any religion for anything that they subject their people to. What I am saying is that when in America, respect the Judeo-Christians, when in Iran, respect the Muslims. However, and this is a big however, when you push, force or otherwise cram your religion down my throat, you are in the wrong. Period. Religion should be spread through peaceful movements, not violent ones. Violence in the name of religion degrades the status of the religion and tends to alienate the intended convertees. That being said, I can find no sustainable argument that Islam is a religion of peace or of objective tolerance. I can, however, find many instances of other religions that practice both peace and tolerance in its various forms.
Posted by: DrTheopolis at April 30, 2007 02:20 PM (9ZqGe)
17
I supposed to care about arab retards that send their children out with bombs strapped to them to kill other children. Then the stupid hateful bitch of a mother puts the kids picture on her mantel and hopes her other monsterous brats will do the same. When a race of people (YES RACE) (Arabs) lowers itself to that level is there a place for them on this planet? Will they ever be able to live in peace with others. Were they assholes before Islam. Is OUTLAWING ISLAM their only hope for savation? I've never said kill them all. YET!
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 02:23 PM (4ytNJ)
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 02:24 PM (4ytNJ)
19
DrTheoplis: My take. When the documents that rule our nation where written by the forefathers Islam was not in the equasion. It should not be now. When the founders of the principles of this nation wrote the rules they were not considering Islam. Their (freedom of religion) was was intended to address the Christian problems at the time. Adding Islam a few hundred years later is like to adding another number between 3 and 4 now that we have math all worked out. It ain't gonna work.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 02:35 PM (4ytNJ)
20
Agreed, greyrooster, Islam is very incompatible with Judeo-Christian values. Our entire legal system would have to be overturned to accommodate it. And, let's face it, that ain't gonna happen because the 2nd Amendment won't ever allow it too, we can thank the founding fathers for that one too. Perhaps, ultimately, they, the FF, did foresee the introduction of Islam or other religions to the U.S. but probably never fully in the context that we have experienced it.
Posted by: DrTheopolis at April 30, 2007 02:57 PM (9ZqGe)
Hating people just because of thier color uis bad. Hating them for what they do is OK, because they can choose thier actions, and you are entitled to your response.
Hating someone for actions they choose which are based on thier own perception of thier own color, or for actions motivated by racism that origionates with them, is OK as well, as long as it is limited to hating those supporting the actual behavior.
In short, If I as a white dude, do something to attack non-whites because I have a white-supremecist viewpoint, I can be legitimately hated for being a white supremecist. Being 'white' tends to go with that view (not always).
If I was a black-supremecist attacking people who didn't fit my definition of 'black', I would be equally as bad as the white supremecists.
In yet another example, there is racism where a group demands special treatment claiming victim status based on thier own race, and thier own perception of race. This is a slicker form of racial supremecist thinking. As a victim, the racist automatically casts another race as a morally inferior agressor whose actions must be mitigated by law that protects special favors for the 'victims'.
They may even go so far as demanding that members of the non-victim race actually pay repairations for things which they neither initiated, not participated in, and which in many ways they have already paid for indirectly. How many families were killed out fighting to free slaves and preserve the republic as a slave free whole? How many 'white' children were never born because thier potential fathers died makning 'black' people free? Where are the repairations for that going to come from??? As for paying for 'black' slavery, I'd say that's been done. time for the whining to stop!
AS a white man I have no use for people who hate based on a supremecist view, even if it is concealed in the guise of victimhood. Black, white, or anywhere in between, if your a supremecist, you suck! If you play the victim card for undeserved sympathy, and to demonize those of another race, you suck! If you push for special treatment for YOUR race, while condemning it for others, you suck! So the KKK, and the Slavery Repairationists both SUCK! The 'go-to-the-back-of-the-bus'ers' AND the 'Affirmative action'ers' BOTH SUCK! The Neo-Nazi's and the NAACP both SUCK! Case in point ... if it was the NAAWP, people would get pissed off! So chew on that all you racists!
I get greyroosters point of virw, but I think he should narrow it down to the specific targets of his wrath. I think he paints with a broad brush. His actual enemies are OTHER RACISTS! They just happen to be black racists, is all.
MY OPINION IS THATTHERE IS ONLY A HUMAN RACE, AND IT COMES IN MANY FLAVORS!
It's ugly politics and intolerant and hateful beliefs, that are the poison that a flavor might be used to conceal. It is to the belief, it's promoters, and thier susequent action that you should direct your displeasure, not a skin color.
Don't miss enjoying the rainbow, because your hung up on a single color! Just focus on being a member of the human race. If you want to be someone special then go do something for the HUMAN race!
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at April 30, 2007 03:39 PM (2OHpj)
22
Sharia is incompatible with the US Constitution. Only one of these systems of law can prevail in the USA. They cannot co-exist. That is the absolute truth. I choose the US Constitution. Absolutely!
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at April 30, 2007 03:41 PM (2OHpj)
23
Of course you do. Only somebody who was suicidal would choose Sharia over...anything. That's the whole point, really. You don't choose Sharia. Just like everything in the religion of unmitigated hatred, oppression, murder, intolerance and decay - it's forced on you, whether you like it or not.
I'd choose sticking hot needles into my eyes over Sharia. US constitution versus Sharia = no competition. One is a series of laws based on equality, justice and freedom, the other is somebosy's idea of a cruel joke.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 30, 2007 04:27 PM (BEY7y)
24
Infidelsalwayswin, your response is right on target. Sharia is a legal system, and as a legal system, it is tyranny. Sharia requires you to behave in a manner that represes those who do not share your religion, and it does not accept reform. I spent a lot of time reading Hadiths last winter, and as a basis for Sharia, it is clear that we cannot accept institutionalization of Sharia in the USA. I wish I could find a win-win, but there isn't one. No Sharia!
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at April 30, 2007 08:37 PM (2OHpj)
25
Michael: I'll go along with your assessment on racism. Actually, it is 97% my views. But if one speaks out he is labeled a racist so might as well be one. Dr T above mentioned the KKK. Now here's a fact. 357 murders in New Orleans last year. 356 of them committed by blacks. None committed by the KKK. Of the 356 murders commited by blacks not one conviction. Why? Could it be the Black major, the black chief of police. the black district attorney (who fired 45 white workers and replaced them with blacks)When I state a true fact like that I will be called a racist. But the black district attorney doesn't get called a racist. He gets re-elected. Why? Because without a doubt the majority of black voters are racist. Saying so makes me a racist. Personally I feel American blacks are becoming a race of cry babies. If Al Sharpton isn't a terrorist then Osama Bin Laden isn't either. I'm happy with that. Makes me proud. Makes me feel brave. Makes me feel honest. Makes me feels truthful. Makes me proud of my race (even if we seem to have a preponderence of woosies). The kkk and stormfronters are merely the opposite of the Black panthers and black muslims. Academia has pushed this nearly non-existent KKK thing until it is nothing but stupidity. Tonight, in New Orleans and other American cities dozens of people will be killed, robbed, beaten and terrorized by blacks. Not one will be killed by the KKK or Nazis or any such group. But tomorrow somehow, someway the KKK will be in the news. And what the hell. If the blacks can do it. Why not the muslims?
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 09:32 PM (3o7Jc)
26
Please notice that Greyrooster the racist has never called for the genocide of Arabs. Has the Canadian Garduneh Mehr? Turkeys do a lot of gobbling but little thinking. The product of 2 times 2 is out of reach to some.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 09:35 PM (3o7Jc)
27
New Orleans is supposed to be a chocolate city now. But, Ray Nagin never mentioned which type of chocolate. Is it: Belgian chocolate, White chocolate, Dark Chocolate, Milk Chocolate? What kind of chocolate is NO supposed to be made of? I'm getting hungry thinking about chocolate now.
Posted by: DrTheopolis at May 01, 2007 09:10 AM (9ZqGe)
28
The Plaza at 9am on a Tuesday three weeks prior to the day. I have burned in my mind the last time I looked up at the splendor and greatness of what my country is capable of. Three weeks later, I witnessed from across the Hudson river the greatest act these religous people could dream up, plan and execute. I am here to tell you Osama, that their plan didn't work. A religion and culture of destruction is just that and will never reach anywhere near the creative ability of a truly great force in the world. We have nothing to fear from those whose only contribution is destruction and the preaching of such - we need only continue creating and building to defeat them because creation is what speaks to hearts. Because creation is the driving force of the Universe and it is on OUR side.
Posted by: tbone at May 01, 2007 11:47 AM (HGqHt)
29
Tbone: You give them to much credit. They had no idea that the towers would come down.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 01, 2007 01:50 PM (qqhSD)
30
Greyrooster, KKK and the like are history. What makes you above other human beings?
Posted by: allahakchew at May 01, 2007 05:46 PM (BrndJ)
31
Stupid cunt. When did I ever say I was above other human beings? Dizzy bitch. Like I told you before use your brain as much as your dildo.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 01, 2007 09:58 PM (pW/bR)
Thinking Out Loud: Abd al-Hadi -- al Muhajiroun Connection?
Pardon my speculation, but as soon as I learned that the Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi was the 7/7 London bombing mastermind, I couldn't help but think that it was a bit singular that six former al Mujahiroun goons, including Abu Izzadeen who publicly supported the 7/7 terrorists, were arrested just days before the announcement that Abd al-Hadi was in U.S. custody.
Glen Jenvey has been insisting to me for some time that ever since the arrest of Abu Hamza (which he had a hand in) that Omar Bakri Mohammed, and his two right-hand men Abu Izzadeen and Anjem Choudary, were the face of al Qaeda in Britain. A charge that is backed up by hours of video and audio of the group supporting jihadists, including al Qaeda, and Omar Bakri Mohammed's pre-9/11 boasting that he was the spokesperson for al Qaeda in the U.K., an affiliation he later denied.
But another fact suddenly comes to mind, something that didn't really click until just now. The forum on which Izzadeen and other Bakri followers now congregate is called "Islam Base". Al Qaeda literally means, "the Base". *Rusty slaps forehead for overlooking the obvious*
And while the public Islam Base website has taken down literature written by Osama bin Laden, after we exposed them, in private forum members continue to exchange al Qaeda literature.
So, given that there is plenty of evidence that Omar Bakri Mohammed's "Islam Base" followers also support al Qaeda, six of those followers are now in jail, and the al Qaeda operative who masterminded the 7/7 London bombings has just been publicly transferred to Guantanamo, I'm wondering if maybe the two events are somehow connected? Either the decision to make Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi's capture public because of the arrest of the six, or the arrest of the six because of the imminent transfer of al-Hadi to Guantanamo after which his detention would no longer be a secret?
And, as long as we are speculating, I would be remiss in not linking a post over at Atlas Shrugs about the possible connection between a former al Muhajiroun arrested in New York some time ago for financing, you guessed it, al Qaeda, and the recent arrest of a Tamil Tiger terrorist who apparently lived a few doors down. Again, a bit singular. And, again, a connection Glen Jenvey has been pointing out to me for some time, which, to be honest, I've mostly ignored. No more.
Yeah, I visited their site hoping to give some of them some shit, but you have to register just to read the stuff in the forums. Or in other words - they've got something to hide. either that or they're just being good little Muslims and doing the Muslim-thing by obfuscation, misinformation etc. I bet the registration form requires the name, email address and number of Jews blamed for your problems fields.
Incidentally, what's a reasonable amount of money to donate to the Jawa Report?
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 28, 2007 10:44 AM (6wu4k)
2al-Hadi, al-Muhajiroun, al-Iraqi, etc... all terrorists.
I'm starting to see a connection here. From now on, I'm looking at my pie al-Amode with great suspicion.
Posted by: Kevin at April 28, 2007 01:35 PM (/ndDU)
3
I would like to think we "tortured" the bastard and he coughed up the other 6, but please don't tell the NY Slimes.
Posted by: Rightmom at April 28, 2007 03:01 PM (ElLn4)
4 Infidelsalwayswin - I think in this case, it would be OK for me to speak for Rusty: A reasonable amount is what you can afford.
While that may sound like a smart-ass answer, that's not my intent. It is the most appropriate answer. If you can only afford to send $5, send $5. If you can afford to send $1,000, and you feel that the Jawa Report is personally worth such an expenditure... go for it! Only you know what your budget can withstand, and how much you personally wish to invest in buying beer, bait and porno for Rusty.
Rusty - You know where to send my 10% commission. Thanks.
Posted by: Kafir at April 28, 2007 03:01 PM (HsmTD)
5
Well, as long as it goes to a good cause, and I say that with no sarcasm whatsoever. I'll get on it tomorrow.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 28, 2007 03:39 PM (6wu4k)
6six of those followers are now in jail, and the al Qaeda operative who
masterminded the 7/7 London bombings has just been publicly transferred
to Guantanamo
May their days be filled with menstruating infidel guards and the nights blaring Britney Spears.
Posted by: Randman at April 28, 2007 04:56 PM (Sal3J)
7
If I only believed his was buying bait. Then, perhaps, I would consider him human. Brainwashed but human. Maybe.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 28, 2007 11:44 PM (x+qDi)
8
Thinking out loud. how else can a brainwashed academic meathead think?
Posted by: greyrooster at April 29, 2007 12:12 AM (x+qDi)
Muslims Publicly Demonstrate Six Arrests as "Crusade", Privately Support TerrorAs we announced previously, the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed were out in force today demonstrating against the arrest of six of their bretheren for supporting terrorism. Predictably, the media covering the event reprints their public lies.
Even a cursory Google search would have shown evidence that Izzadeen and the five others arrested support terrorism--including al Qaeda. The evidence against the six terror supporters is all public!
This is not some crusade against Islam, as the protesters today insisted. And if the Brits really cracked down on all who supported terror in their country, then tens of thousands would have been arrested. Yes, the problem is that bad.
The biggest lie reprinted is that under Shariah law Christians, Jews, and Muslims get along peacefully. This is the same group of protesters who publicly called for the execution of the Pope for "blasphemy". Blasphemy is a capital offense under that wonderful law of Allah's known as Sharia.
This is also the same group which held up signs saying, "Behead those who insult Islam" because some Danish newspapers had offended their religious sensibilities.
If that isn't bad enough, these same people have publicly celebrated the 7/7 mass murderers as well as the "Magnificent 19" who carried out the 9/11 attacks.
Several people in London e-mailed saying they would attend today's rally and send in pics. Hopefully we'll receive them soon.
Islamic supporters of six Muslims arrested in London earlier this week today staged a rowdy demonstration outside the top security police station where they are being held.
Dozens of angry demonstrators branded Tony Blair a "terrorist" while carrying banners stating "Sharia Law - the future, free our Muslim brothers" and "Crusade against Islam"....
Mr [Sayful] Islam said: "We definitely want to see Sharia law in place here. We want to see it implemented for everyone. Only then will there be harmony and there will be peace and justice amongst mankind."...
"We believe that as Muslims Sharia is for everyone and it can actually help solve problems in the world today.
"We have a very good economic system that will deal with homelessness in this country. In Palestine, Jews, Christians and Muslims lived peacefully for over 500 years under Shariah law."
Interestingly, the LSE piece names Sayful Islam as the "organizer" of the protest and as someone who is "very close" to one of the jailed terror supporters, Rajid Khan.
What is so interesting about this is that at the password protected forum where the protest was organized, the person making the announcement simply goes by the name of "Islam Base". This suggest that Sayful Islam, since he is claiming to have organized the rally, is "Islam Base."
Importance? On the same forum "Islam Base"--who appears to by Sayful Islam--answers a querry about the "The University of Al-Qa’idah for the Sciences of Jihad". He answers by attaching a copy of Osama bin Laden's "Declaration of War" and, later on in the same thread, says that the book "39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad" will help the reader prepare.
So, we have Sayful Islam publicly declaring that the six arrested are part of a larger plot--a "crusade"-- by the British government to persecute Muslims...for no good reason. Then, in private, the same man encouraging forum members to train for jihad by distributing al Qaeda literature!
UPDATE: IHT has better coverage, including mention of Anjem Choudary, another lying al Qaeda supporter. No surprise, the rally began in the Regent's Park Mosque:
The protest began shortly after midday prayers at Regent's Park Mosque, where Anjem Choudary, the former leader of the outlawed militant group al-Ghurabaa, addressed the crowd, demanding that they join him in protesting the detention of Izzadeen — a former spokesman for his group.
"You are living under oppression, the government is terrorizing the Muslim community," he told worshippers. "It's about time you stand together." ...
"They bomb us, and occupy our land, and here they arrest at you early in the morning!" he said, to cries of "UK — You will pay!" and shouts of "Allahu Akbar! (God is Great)"
But he predicted the ultimate victory of Muslims over their enemies. "One day, my dear Muslims, the flag of Islam will fly over Downing Street!" he said, to renewed shouts of "Allah Akbar!"
UPDATE II: Unless, of course, Islam didn't really organize the rally and it was really Choudary who goes by the nickname of "Islam Base" at the forum. In which case.........
more...
1
"But he predicted the ultimate victory of Muslims over their enemies. "One day, my dear Muslims, the flag of Islam will fly over Downing Street!" he said, to renewed shouts of "Allah Akbar!""
Maybe Prince Harry should start fighting terrorism at home before shipping out to Iraq?
Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at April 27, 2007 02:49 PM (gtZwa)
2
We may not be far behind the UK. This article discusses the "need" for more islamic schools in America. We are very much aware of the corriculum in these schools and yet they are being built.
But a more subtle dynamic is at work in the national surge in Islamic private schools. It represents a coming of age, in the view of many Muslim leaders, for a community striving to define itself as a cohesive religious minority in the secular American society.
Islaming of America
Posted by: allahakchew at April 27, 2007 02:58 PM (BrndJ)
Don't you mean the distant past? Eh, anyway, if there's one thing you can bet on, it's that certainly not everybody, and not even your weird little minority will ever get your wish to implement Sharia here. We've had common law here for nearly 1000 years; it's one of our proudest acheivements, and alot of people have suffered and died to get where we are today. And if you think that a bunch of - for the most part - unwanted immigrants from a bunch of countries that're all complete failures in every measurable field is going to change that, then truly you are as a lot of us suspected: fucking insane. Europe is finally beginning to shift to the right in the political spectrum, and although it's taken its precious time, and some are doing it faster than others, it's all in response to a common threat: Islam.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 27, 2007 03:20 PM (HEbmd)
5
I tagged you for the Thinking Bloggger Award.
I think that you might have been tagged before, but you can never have enough of them.
Posted by: allahakchew at April 27, 2007 03:41 PM (BrndJ)
8
Geeze wouldn't you know it I commented on the above link on my post of #6 and it wasn't accepted. The biggest joke is the first comment, very smart, savy, and putting them down whithout them realizing it. I need to work on my approach so I also will prevail...:-)
Posted by: allahakchew at April 27, 2007 03:45 PM (BrndJ)
9
"The biggest lie reprinted is that under Shariah law Christians, Jews, and Muslims get along peacefully."
Rusty, that isnt a lie at all - its absolutely, 100% true. As long as you learn to submit to the laws of your betters (the ummah) you will find peace.
Allah has appointed Muslims to be masters of the Earth. Even Jesus Christ(PBUH) has advised you to obey your superiors for we will have been placed in authority by Him.
So learn to be a good dog and crawl on all fours - but don't forget to send your checks to the IRS (Islamic Revenue Service)!!!
We arent coming to America, WE ARE AMERICANS (but Muslims first!!!)
Posted by: salaamalaikooum at April 27, 2007 05:50 PM (C9xXD)
10
Hey Rusty is commenter #9 one of those moderate muslims you support. All muslims eat pig shit and should be deported back to their stinking backward assed countries. OUTLAW ISLAM before it stinks up America more than it already has. They have already brainwashed academic meatheads. We must get rid of them before they brainwash more idealist idiots.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 27, 2007 08:47 PM (7p5VY)
11
Hey Greyrooster, if you can't detect the difference between a tongue-in-cheek post and a serious post, you just might have to give back that degree from Cal.
Posted by: Rusty at April 28, 2007 09:47 AM (JQjhA)
12
The degree maybe. Never learned anything anyway. My cleets and jersey never.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 28, 2007 04:37 PM (q7s2f)
13
And who can tell the difference lately? They sound the same.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 28, 2007 04:38 PM (q7s2f)
14
"As long as you learn to submit to the laws of your betters (the ummah) you will find peace." Never happen! The USA will NEVER submit to your disgusting Sharia! If that is the choice of Islam, then there must be a reckoning wherein the mark of Islam is scorched from the face of the Earth, once and for all! If that is the choice, then I will choose war until victory, against ANY who make such demands against my Country. If that is the 'peace' you offer, I say we give you a 'peace' that will be the pleasure of future generations born frree from your insidious threat! You should be sent to your afterlife, and your gravestone should be ashes, and dust! If no Muslim finds fault with what you have said, then they should join you in utter, and absolute destruction! I have no mercy for those who uphold your arguement, and you need to be wiped out!
USA, ALL THE WAY!!!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at April 30, 2007 10:48 PM (2OHpj)
Omar Bakri Mohammed Reads Jawa!
When I say everyone is reading The Jawa Report these days, I mean everyone. Including the followers of Britain's number one Osama bin Laden fan.
As soon as word comes down that Adam "Azzam al Amreki" Gadahn reads the Jawa, I'll retire.
Being a Britisher, I think I'm qualified to say that Britain's problem is that it's got, oh, around 1.62 M too many Muslims living here. If, for example, all of the Muslims were to just leave (all obvious practical obstacles aside) tomorrow, then Britain'd lose absolutely nothing for it. Indeed, it'd actually gain a great deal through the reductions in hatred, intolerance, terrorism, fraud, genocidal rhetoric, hypocrisy and weirdness. I think that general rule could be applied to any country.
Afterall, is it a coincidence that all of the countries (and I use the word for reference more than anything) which are the biggest fuckups are all Islamic countries?
Anyway, if you're reading this Omar (if that is your real name): everyone's laughing at you. You, your cadre and your weird death-cult invented by an illiterate, woman-beating, kiddy-fiddling mass murderer.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 13, 2007 08:58 AM (Vj/IE)
6
Amen brothr amen. I been shouting the same message here is America for years. Get rid of this disease before it gets you. Muslims have no business in the Western World. They are incompatible with western civilization. Mass deportations and OUTLAWING ISLAM in the west is the only answer.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 15, 2007 08:59 AM (2J0r9)
That would be a great big fucking A-men brother coming at you from over here...............But rather then deporting them, couldn’t we just use them for pig feed???? If Allah rejects them for touching pig shit can you imagine what he does to them for becoming pig shit???
Birmingham Mosque Supporting Exiled al Qaeda Supporter? (Sticky)***sticky***scroll down for newer**
A week after the website of radical cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed was shut down (thank us later), his followers have migrated to a new website. The new website is registered to an address that matches what was once Western Europe's largest Islamic house of worship: The Birmingham Central Mosque.
The mosque address is:
180 Belgrave Middleway, Highgate, Birmingham England B12 0XS
A Whois search of Bakri Mohammed's website, islambase.co.uk, reveals this as the address of the registrant:
180 Belgrave Middleway, Highgate 2
Birmingham, B12 0XS, United Kingdom
The. Same. Address.
The Birmingham Central Mosque is described by this Wikipedia article:
Birmingham Central Mosque is the second purpose built mosque in the United Kingdom....The mosque was then officially opened in 1975 as the largest mosque in Western Europe....Since the mosque's establishment, it has become a focal point for the Birmingham Muslim community, providing education for children and adults, lectures and seminars, counselling and a marriage bureau along with sporting and recreational activities and workshops....
The chairman of the Birmingham Mosque Trust is Dr Mohammad Naseem, a nationally recognised and sometimes controversial Muslim leader. Dr Naseem once claimed that Al Qaeda did not exist.
Does Dr. Naseem, like Omar Bakri Mohammed, support the radical Islamist agenda of al Qaeda?
Why yes, he does. In fact, "He is executive member of and home affairs spokesman for the Islamic Party of Britain."
Its main efforts are, however, directed at the majority of non- Muslims living in the West, who are to be offered practical alternatives to the mounting problems of modern society and may be helped to understand that as an ideology and way of life Islam is superior to the failed ideologies of capitalism and communism.
In other words, the implementation of Sharia law. They are the British front for the Muslim Brotherhood, the less violent fellow travellers of al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Dr. Naseem is on the record as both a 9/11 skeptic and has expressed doubts about the authenticity of the Mohammed Sidique Kahn martyrdom videotape.
Omar Bakri Mohammed has been told he would not be allowed to reenter the U.K. after he fled the country when a number of his followers were linked to death threats and statements in support of terror and jihad. Since that time, he has been exposed to be a supporter of al Qaeda. Much of this relationship is explored in Jeremy Reynald's book, War on the Web: Fighting the Online Jihad. Just last week this video of Bakri Mohammed justifying the 9/11 attacks was released.
[UPDATE 5/1/2007: These links were taken down and no longer appear on their webpage. It's almost like they're afraid of something..... ;-) ]His Islambase webpage, the one registered to the Central Birmingham Mosque address, has a variety of pro-jihadi material on it. For instance, one of their free English language books is titled: 39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad.
Peaceful inner struggle? From the book:
So, the Muslims of today are left with no choice but that of jihad and the language of weaponry....the only way to come to an understanding with the enemy is through the language of force and revenge?
There is no solution except for the greatest jihad. World peace no longer satisfies us. (p. 6)
It just gets worse from there. Including chapters on "preparing yourself for the jihad", "financially supporting the mujahidin", and "inciting the peole to jihad".
And the ever important, "Hide the secrets of the mujahidin from the enemy". Who is the enemy? "Whoever does this [exposes the mujahidin]....he is assisting the Americans."
Omar Bakri Mohammed's follower's at Islambase even have their own Youtube channel.
Bakri Mohammed is a known al Qaeda sympathizer, yet when he was living in Britain he was careful always to hide this supprt by using ambiguous terms in public. But we have amassed a number of videos and audios showing that, privately, he was rather direct in this support.
There is also a large following of Bakri Mohammed in Birmingham. Those followers, once known as al-Muhajiroun until they were banned, have had clashes with Dr. Naseem in the past.
Given, though, that the remnants of the followers of al Muhajiroun are now congregating on a website registered to the very mosque that Dr. Naseem leads, one wonders how real those conflicts are? Or were those conflicts simply cover for an internal power struggle? Or over the best tactics on reaching the Islamic State? Both Naseem's Islamic Party and Bakri Muhammed's followers claim that very same goal.
So, does this all mean that there is a secret working relationship between the self-proclaimed 'moderate' leadership of the Birmingham Central Mosque and Bakri Mohammed? Or is the Birmingham Central Mosque the victim of a prankster in Bakri Mohammed's organization who thought it would be funny to register their website to the mosque address?
As of this writing, we have no idea. I would like to think the latter. I hope that either Dr. Naseem himself, or any of the others on the board of directors at the mosque have no relationship with Bakri Mohammed.
But there is one more fact which needs to be added to this mystery. It does not prove that there is a relationship, but it strongly suggests it. All Bakri Mohammed's past websites have been registered to legitimate physical addresses where he or his followers lived, worked, or congregated.
Let's hope this is an exception to the trend.
P.S.--If you are in the U.K. you might want to spread the word to Brit bloggers and/or media. I just don't have the resources to do the needed followup on this.
more...
Posted by: Darth Odie at March 30, 2007 04:59 PM (YHZAl)
3
you guys would not have to spend 30+ posts a day on these scumbag terrorists if the world governments actually did something about the problem.
it is simple math really, for every arab you kill there is one less terrorist walking in our communities. so the right and the just thing to do here is eliminate the arab population and protect the freedom loving nations they are terrorizing.
i am tired of the usa and others not doing a thing to rid the world of all arabs and make it safe again.
Posted by: Alan Jay Robertson at March 30, 2007 04:59 PM (DCZ7U)
4
Nice. So your "final solution" would be to kill all Arabs? "Brilliant".
Posted by: Rusty at March 30, 2007 05:02 PM (JQjhA)
5
It's the ideology that's the problem not the race. Now having said that, one must also understand that this particular ideology only understands force.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 30, 2007 05:14 PM (j97MF)
6
arabs as a race have been proven to be subhuman. these filthy people continously attack America and Israel and exist solely to raise terror in the world. they have no chance of redemption and it is Christ's final judgement that they be eliminated.
we are currently running a bible study group that shows our middle school pupils exactly how to deal with and ultimately kill any arab child they come across who is obviously sent to the USA to commit acts of terrorism against us.
the end days are upon us and we must all be vigilant. perhaps our leaders need to listen to the annointed gospel being taught by great pastors John Hagee and others on TBN.
Posted by: Alan Jay Robertson at March 30, 2007 05:18 PM (DCZ7U)
7
There are numerous Christian Arab's in this world; and as far as I know they don't hurt a fly. And again as far as I know the only occasions that some Christian Arabs have reacted with force were when they were set upon by Islamist aggressors.
And FYI, We all have to answer to our Maker for all our deeds, misdeeds, omissions and commissions. No one is exempt from this.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 30, 2007 05:26 PM (j97MF)
8
... And there are Arabs who followers other faiths and/or philosophies including humanism. I haven't known these folks to be aggressors either.
It's Islam that's the problem. It's Islamic ideology that's the enemy.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 30, 2007 05:34 PM (j97MF)
9You shall love your neighbor as yourself. [Matthew 19:19]
God is my witness if there wasn't so much aggression and cruelty being perpetrated by the followers of Islam I wouldn't have anything against them either.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 30, 2007 05:54 PM (j97MF)
your compassion is commendible but it just is not valid in todays arab infested world of terror. radical tough times require great sacrifice and total committment to bringing back peace.
this cannot be acheived through pacifism at this point and the entire root of the evil--the arab who attacks us. must be eliminated.
when the last arab man woman and child draws breath on the planet you will see a great period of peace and prosperity that we cannot acheive now.
God Bless.
Posted by: Alan Jay Robertson at March 30, 2007 06:05 PM (DCZ7U)
11
Malkin is looking hot on O'Reilly factor right now 8:15 pm Fri 3/30
Posted by: SeeMonk at March 30, 2007 07:15 PM (yKwZ2)
12
Alan Jay Robertson,
I somewhat agree with what you say, although killing all Arabs is a little extreme. But any of these ideas, extreme or not, coming from someone like you who is obviously a part of the extreme religious right here in America is hypocritical and idiotic. Islamic extremists need to be eliminated in a secular, non-religious manner. Morons like you running around preaching this shit turns it into a crusade, which validates their every accusation of a crusade against Islam and will swell their ranks. You are no different than they are- a whacked out religious nutbag who thinks killing others is doing gods work. Who would you go after when all the Muslims were dead, huh? I'm sure your god would suggest someone who didn't see things your way. All religion is bad religion, and you have so much more in common with them than you even realize that you really have no business whatsoever speaking of their elimination. True, they need to be eliminated outright, but by people who are more interested with the security of this nation and the rest of the free world than some asshole like you taking orders from an old guy with a beard sitting in the sky. Bollocks to ya.
Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at March 30, 2007 07:18 PM (ou0cx)
your compassion is commendible" I agree, and it never goes out of style with Jesus either. Racism however, is not a trait that Jesus has ever shown, or endorsed in his words, or behavior. And being an anti-racist isn't pacifism so don't equate the two. Targeting "Germans" in WW2 would have deprived us of some of our best leaders, so Alan, why not think that over a bit, then come down to earth. USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 30, 2007 08:26 PM (2OHpj)
As a Christian, I will suggest a point of view regarding the oft quoted "Render unto Caesar". Some Christian anarchists suggest wrongly, that this means that since God owns the world, it all belongs to God, and there is nothing left for Caesar.
That of course, is bullcrap. Believing in God doesn't wipe away the debt you owe the Republic, for the fruits you enjoy through your rights, and under her protection!
God made the earth ... fine. My state and federal governments built the roads I drive on, and the schools I went to, and the dam that controls the floodwaters when they come. My life is from God, but my state is armed and organized to protect my life, and my rights along with it. We owe Caesar some consideration at the least. Supporting the war to fight our enemies is a part of that.
Only when God and Republic are clearly at odds do you need to pick a side. Like for instance, when they rule against free exercise. Even still, that is a seperate fight, from the choice of upholding the common good. We are to love our neighbor. How does it work out if we don't pay the taxes that we all benefit from.
What we owe God, is that we not bear false witness against others. Like saying we should kill Arabs who ARE NOT AIDING TERRORISTS. To accuse, and punish under false pretenses is wrong. It is against God, and though Jack has his point of view, it is largely correct. We aren't here to turn Arabs against God, but we are allowed to seek out those who repeatedly prove we cannot reason with them. Those we may fight.
If you know anything about Christianity, then you know it is for all people to come to as they will, and the ultimate decider of who is beyond redemption, is God. Until the final judgement comes, we are obliged to be realistic in our state matters. We do the best we can with what we have.
So as Jack points out, no blanket acts of violent racism will do the Republic any good, nor will they do Christianity any good. Those who think differently, need to open His Book a bit more often. Or at least increase bloodflow to the brain.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 30, 2007 09:03 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: dick at March 30, 2007 11:16 PM (UGmeS)
16
Why stop with arab muslims? Get all the muslim pricks.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2007 12:27 AM (LDOOz)
17
Message to the Brits. For rent. Six Klansmen who know how to handle a mosque.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2007 12:28 AM (LDOOz)
18
For all of you out there who advocate killing all Muslims, Arabs, Persians or whatever... a warning: You are only one step from becoming what you so despise.
Want to kill Ayan Hirsi Ali? http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/187200.php
How about cutting the head off of Wafa Sultan? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYB4pG3kHIY
Or Brigitte Gabirel? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S55o2hNIXzk
Get a clue.
Posted by: Kafir at March 31, 2007 05:29 AM (HsmTD)
19
Kafir. Couldn't have said it better myself! USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 31, 2007 06:06 AM (2OHpj)
20
#6 What kind of bible study are you running? Sounds like to me you are studying radical islam and making those stupid comments bout killing all Arabs as a cover. If I am wrong you are really a sicko and need to seek mental health counseling.
Posted by: allahahachew at March 31, 2007 08:13 AM (BrndJ)
21
#6 Alan Jay Robertson. Did your name come about by using these two names--Jay Alan (Sekulow) and (Pat) Robertson? Found an interesting article while digging:http://www.cephasministry.com/nwo_voices_of_extremist.html
Posted by: allahahachew at March 31, 2007 08:57 AM (BrndJ)
22
Bullshit! Killing muslims is a good thing. If they don't convert to another religiion remove the filth from the earth. Islam is a desease. Not a religion.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2007 10:44 AM (zj89s)
23
absolutely greyrooster and alan. the slaughter of all muslims and persians is the only method to victory in the war on terror.
as for his bible study it states in revelations we all shall be warriors in the end times and vigilance is a must.
Posted by: Jason Briggs at March 31, 2007 12:06 PM (Nhfns)
Posted by: allahahachew at March 31, 2007 12:39 PM (BrndJ)
25
#22 You sound like radical islam.....convert or die.....whats up?
Posted by: allahahachew at March 31, 2007 12:48 PM (BrndJ)
26
Thank you idiots for totally blowing this thread. The threat is real in the UK and "John Doe" was trying to pass on the info. All of your rantings about killing the muslim/arabs just blew this thread. Screw your head on ritght and get to the bottom of the threat. Your comments hurt Jawa and make it less credible. I feel we are after the same thing....stopping radical islam....Preview is your best friend!..Think before you submit.
Posted by: allahahachew at March 31, 2007 12:58 PM (BrndJ)
27
the threat is real because our governments wont stand up and do the right thing to eliminate that threat: the total eradication of all arabs and persians.
these filthy subhuman creatures cannot be bargained with, reasoned with, or even debated. they exist solely to kill others and wreak havoc on the planet.
eliminate arabs and persians and you eliminate the threat within your communities.
Posted by: Jason Briggs at March 31, 2007 01:18 PM (Nhfns)
28
Jason Briggs, you are sick. You are a shill and i hope your country folds. Islam is not the answer.....you creep!
Posted by: allahahachew at March 31, 2007 01:25 PM (BrndJ)
Posted by: allahahachew at March 31, 2007 01:26 PM (BrndJ)
30
Just to explain my last post I have been following posts by Jason and he seems to be a Klansman. You, Jason, are as bad as the radical islamist, you are a lefty and suggest you post on their posts. There is no room for you here. Spew your hatred on Daily Kos and Huffington Post, they will welcome you.
Posted by: allahahachew at March 31, 2007 01:31 PM (BrndJ)
31
no i am not a klansman, i am not from the south.
however you must be pretty stupid to attribute klansmen with the left since they are a far right organization.
i do not condone violence against blacks, jews, or other Americans.
i only condone violence against arabs, persians, homosexuals, and followers of islam. they are the enemy and they cannot be reasoned with.
i pray to Jesus every day that i have the opportunity to slit the throats of young arab children. watching a 4 year old arab child gasp his last breath and knowing that this will never be another terrorist to harm Americans would be the proud moment of a true patriot.
if you love America you will help destroy the arabs.
Posted by: Jason Briggs at March 31, 2007 01:46 PM (Nhfns)
32
Jason Briggs you are sick. Slitting the throat of a child? I would like to know if you have every e-mailed a terrorist? Have you set yourself up to be identified? You are a sick puppy that would be happy to see an innocent child to die. BTW Klansman are not a far ritght organization it is only in your mind.. You are a coward hiding behind the klansman. Jawa is all about stopping radical islam and you do not have the guts to expose yourself to the real threat. You are a wimp!!
Posted by: george at March 31, 2007 02:06 PM (BrndJ)
33
arab children are not innocent. they are subhuman, undeserving of life, filthy and vile. they are only bred to kill Americans and Israelis.
anyone that sheds one tear over the life of an arab child is a fool and a traitor.
and for the last time i am not in the kkk i am a true American patriot.
Posted by: Jason Briggs at March 31, 2007 02:11 PM (Nhfns)
34
Ya'll got it all wrong, the point of war s to make war on your enemy till they surrender, now if your enemy does not have the good sense to surrender you keep making war, not your problem hw is stupid. But you make war as hard and as fast as you can because to do less is cruel. War is already cruel. An extended or unsettles war is druelty upon the next generation.
That being said we are doing none of what needs to be done. You have to fight on all fronts, economic, strategic, tactical. You have to own your enemy's ass. Someone had to be tired of t. Given the arab worlds general thirst for death and self destrucion, I'd say it would take quite a bit before they get a belly-full. Sad, but there is your job laid out for you.
Pissy job, I'd rather be chasing butterflies.
Posted by: Darth Odie at March 31, 2007 03:44 PM (YHZAl)
35
Oh and I'd like to add, no one kills more arabs than arabs themselves!
Posted by: Darth Odie at March 31, 2007 03:46 PM (YHZAl)
36Jason Briggs: "i pray to Jesus every day that i have the opportunity to slit the
throats of young arab children. watching a 4 year old arab child gasp
his last breath and knowing that this will never be another terrorist
to harm Americans would be the proud moment of a true patriot."
Thank you for your candor, Jason. As repayment, I am now about to report you ,and your IP address, to a friend at the FBI. That quote is not enough to prosecute (thanks for the first amendment), but there's a good chance he can get you flagged for investigation.
Oh... and if you think I'm blowing smoke, go take a look at who contributes to my website, Global Defense Group. Nearly all are embers of the military, law enforcement and intelligence community. They don't take kindly to talk of slitting children's throats, and neither do I. Time to start watching over your shoulder, buddy.
Kafir Administrator, Global Defense Group
Posted by: Kafir at March 31, 2007 06:33 PM (HsmTD)
as long as you continue to vote republican I will pray for your salvation!
Posted by: Jason Briggs at March 31, 2007 06:51 PM (Nhfns)
38
You have no idea how I vote, and I don't want or need you on 'my side'. You are scum, pure and simple.
Posted by: Kafir at March 31, 2007 08:08 PM (HsmTD)
39
Jason Briggs: Asshole who said anything about Persians? Friggin idiot. Don't include me in your bullshit. Persians don't always equal muslim. Jerkoff!
Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2007 08:29 PM (P64nD)
40
Allahawhatever: My war is with muslims. You can have your ideas. I have mine. Until the woosies understand that the world is at war with muslims the outlook for the future of our children and grandchildren is bleak at best. You can have your ideas of hugging and kissing them. I find that silly but I don't make personal referrences to you because of your silly beliefs. I don't judge you. Don't do it to me.
Also it is downright stupid to refer to Jason Briggs as a klansman. You obviously don't know what you are talking about. But I will not refer to you as an idiot because of your lack of knowledge.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2007 08:38 PM (P64nD)
41
Jason Briggs: Damn right you are not a southerner or a Klansman. If I catch you at either place I'll whoop your ass and use your neck to teach the future Klansmen knot tying 101.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2007 08:40 PM (P64nD)
42
there goes greyrooster our resident muslim. allah cannot save you greyrooster only the swift hand of justice can deal with your kind.
kafir, I love you, Jesus loves you. we all pray you can see the light and join us in our victory crusade against the arabs and persians!
God Bless America
Posted by: Jason Briggs at March 31, 2007 10:01 PM (Nhfns)
43
I have to denounce Jason, and Alan Jay. I ask all other readers to read thier comments, only with the understanding that thier views are extreme. Most likely, they are only pretending to be Christian, or Conservative, so they can associate thier vile remarks with those causes, and thereby attempt to deflect the goals of both. Don't buy into it. USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 31, 2007 11:13 PM (2OHpj)
#40 Greyrooster, I was just commenting on your "convert or die" post. That is in the playbook of islam. (although if you pay jizpaw or however you spell it you don't die) Convert or die is in radical islam. Our country is in dire need of someone who has the guts to stand up to this invasion of radical islam. Most moderate islamist are too afraid because they would be an apostate and that means death. Until we can instill in them the need to stand up (and support them with whatever it takes as what is happening in Iraq) this battle against radicals is going to keep raging. Wiping out an race is not the answer. John Walker Lynd was an American and ending fighting with the Taliban. The Aussie who was just sentenced (to a RIDUCULOUS short sentence) is another example. BTW you were very polite in your opposition to my post....thank you
...just thought I would add that.
Posted by: allahakchew at April 01, 2007 01:40 PM (BrndJ)
47
I think you just said? When it comes to muslims you fight fire with fire. You will not talk them out of their beliefs. But you make be able to beat it out of them.
Now THINK FOR A MOMENT. I will give you an example of how it works in the muslim world. There was once a country named India. Muslims could not get along with the other religions and much death and destruction came of it. Therefore it was decided to separate since it was impossible to get along with the muslims. India divided itself into two countries. One for the muslims and one for the rest. The muslim country was called East and West Pakistan. West Pakistan later became independent and now calls itself bangladesh. So Muslims in Pakistan and Hindu in India. Today the desease called Islam is back in India and continues to grow. However, please note that their are no Hindus in Pakistan. Islam is a desease. Like smallpox. Like the measels, the mumps, tuberculoses. It must be irraticated or it will start up again to cause pain and suffering. No where in the world is Islam at peace with its non muslim neighbors or non muslim population. At this time all wars and fighting in the world are due to Islam and its barbaric followers. Doesn't matter what continent. I will deal no further but make this statement. Race has much to do with the hatred Islam shows to others. Islam is composed in the majority by inferior people who offer nothing to society except pain and suffering. There has been less the 20 international patents issued to the Islamic world in the past twenty years. Hewlitt Packard averages 9 per day. Islamics are a jealous people, silly, barbarous, cruel, untrustworthy and backward as you can get. Their religion has denied them a place in modern society. Their filthy religion is what separates them from normal people. The followers of Mohammed (piss be upon him) are the dregs of humanity. NOW THE QUESTION IS WHY SHOULD WE PUT UP WITH THOSE WHO OFFER NOTHING BUT SUFFERING? I say they must be shown that their behavior will not be tolerated. This is a given. NOW HOW DO WE SHOW THEM WE ARE SERIOUS? Hugging them? Talking to them? Setting a good example? BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Give them what they will understand.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 01, 2007 08:11 PM (3HRh+)
7/7 Bombing Suspects Named
Police in Britain released the names of three men arrested yesterday on suspicion of involvement in the 7/7 London bombings. They are:
Mohammed Shakil --30 year old taxi driver from Leeds
Shipon Ullah --23, from Leeds
Sadeer Saleem --26
Very little is known about the last two, but Shakil is described as a father of three and a model employee. Two of the three were picked up at the Manchester airport, which suggests that they had been under surveillance for some time and that the arrest came only as a reaction to the fact that they were about to leave for Pakistan. Once in Pakistan, even if arrested, there would be no chance for British authorities to question them.
were not "bomb makers", although they were suspected of providing financial support and accommodation to the bombers, and of having knowledge of the attacks on three London tube trains and a bus.
Although Shakil told his employer and friends he was just going to Pakistani controlled Kashmir to visit his sick father for a few weeks, he had quit his job and his apartment seemed abandoned.
All describe him as "nice" or "quiet" or a number of other adjectives which make him appear to be your model citizen. Which is quite typical of how terrorists or Islamic extremists are often described.
Expect more to come on these men. My friend in the U.K. is now convinced, more than ever, that he knows that the common thread is Omar Bakri Mohammed. We know Abu Izzadeen, Mohammed, and the other remnants of al Muhajiroun supported the idea of the 7/7 attacks. That they give their moral support to British Muslims killing British civilians. That in a general sense they are responsible for helping incite and provide moral justifications for the recruitment of terrorists to kill. But it is still unclear to me at least, whether there is a direct connection.
Bonus video of Omar Bakri Mohammed and Abu Izzadeen justifying 7/7 below. Izzadeen is the black guy, Bakri Mohammed the fat guy with the beard. Both are equally disgusting pieces of work. Izzadeen is in jail pending trial for inciting terrorism in the speech. Bakri Mohammed is in exile in Lebanon, but continues to preach to U.K. followers and collect money from them through his London registered website.
more...
Three Arrested in 7/7 BombingsMore arrests in the London 7/7 bombings today. 7/7 has been called the U.K.'s 9/11. 52 passengers on various public transportaion lines in London were murdered on that day by Muslims inpired by al Qaeda. Police in Britain believe that al Qaeda may have been involved in both the planning and funding of the mass murder.
Three men were today arrested in connection with the July 7 London bombings, which killed 52 commuters on the capital's public transport system.
In the first significant arrests since the 2005 suicide attacks, two men, aged 23 and 30, were detained shortly before 1pm at Manchester airport, where they were due to catch a flight to Pakistan.
A third man, aged 26, was arrested at a house in Leeds shortly after 4pm...
It is understood the three arrested men are from Leeds. The property being searched in Colwyn Rd is on the same street as the house where Tanweer lived with his parents, who worked in a fish and chip shop.
Allah reminds us that there had previously been a link between the 7/7 bomb plotters and Leeds. You'll recall that Magdi El-Nashar had been 'detained' in Egypt in July of last year [pictured above right]. Authories found the substance TATP in Magdy al-Nashar's Leeds apartment, but he claimed the explosive 'wasn't his'. He was a professor at Leed's University. Interesting fact about Magdi El-Nasher: He spent a semester at North Carolina University in grad school studying biochemistry.
On a related note, in a British court today Manfo Asiedu, who was arrested two weeks after the 7/7 bombings, claimed that he had planned an attack which would be "bigger and better" than the transit system bombings. He's radically changed his defense from 'it was all a joke, we're victims of Islamophobia' to 'we were planning to blow up an apartment complex'. Apparently he's pointing the finger at another defendant at the trial, Muktar Said Ibrahim, as the ringleader. UPDATE: LGF has video here.
Allah also reminds readers of how 7/7 got to Abu Izzadeen's funny bone. And since we just ran a video of Abu Izzadeen a few days ago, you might want to go check out his sermon on Islam=terrorism. Be sure to wait til he begins justifying the beheading of Paul Johnson by the 'mujahidin'.
I have a friend in Britain who swears that if Izzadeen wasn't personally involved in the 7/7 attacks, then it was at least inspired by his mentor, Omar Bakri Mohammed. Here is a a video of Bakri Muhammed extolling the virtues of al Qaeda, shortly before the 7/7 bombings.
1
While my heart of heart wants to holler "w00t!"...I know this is going to be distorted by the conspiracy theorists, who want to blame those in power, and the Mulim contingent, who wants to somehow blame the Jooooooooo.
I miss the days when such evidence used to mean something.
2
I'm sure at this moment hordes of politically correct/pink/commie/liberals are haranguing the Scotland trying to portray the arrested terrorists as "innocent victims of racial profiling".
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 22, 2007 05:15 PM (j97MF)
3
Fitting punishment would be to put them on a plane on autopilot. At 35,00 feet run out of fuel. Let them know what it feels like. Maybe, give them cell phones so they can talk to their families before crashing.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 22, 2007 08:14 PM (jNRRK)
(Video) British Muslim: Islam = Terrorism, Paul Johnson Beheading Justified
Abu Izzadeen, a follower of British cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed, talks about that peaceful inner struggle called "jihad". Try not to throw anything at your computer screen as you watch. The video takes place in a London mosque:
Terrorism is part and parcel to Islam. Terrorism is part of the deen [Islamic way of life] of Islam. Yes. Allah said ... "to terrify the enemis of Allah, we should prepare ourselves." Prepare to go to war [jihad]. Jihad is [a religous obligation] on Muslims, on the males of like us here. That is why you should teach your son how to ride. How to shoot. It is the sunna [example of the Prophet Muhammed] of Muhammed, and a [religious obligation] on you as a father to teach him to become a mujahidid....
Posted by: greyrooster at March 19, 2007 09:17 PM (jNRRK)
3
Oh yeah, like I won't be doing a voiceover for that clip! HA! Thanks for the inspiration. This'll be fun.
Posted by: Pim's Ghost at March 19, 2007 09:58 PM (TK5Ak)
4
Yawn....I you are stupid enough that this shit caught you by surprise please be so kind as to raise your hand...so some one smarter than you can shot you in the fucking head...........................
Posted by: doriangrey at March 19, 2007 10:14 PM (F5T2G)
5
Where do they find these assholes? Hope this prick isn't another black muslim from Chicago like the last one.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 19, 2007 10:18 PM (jNRRK)
6
The zombies of the false prophet Mohammed are victims. They have very active delusions. Sometimes they speak out like Mohammed did when he stood up in a crowd of people and proclaimed "I have a new message from god!!" (he didn't). We should have mercy on false prophet victims who can be rehabilitated. We should stop the spread of mental diseases insofar as they can be stopped.
Posted by: Val at March 19, 2007 11:06 PM (Nu5Eb)
7
For some time I have wanted to hear this one statement and finally...finally I get to confirm my suspicions: Abu Izzadeen said, "Innocence is only for the Muslims". (At the end of the video)
So can we now assume that when they say they abhor violence to the innocents...they aren't talking about non-Muslims? The man said just that!
Posted by: DeWaun at March 20, 2007 10:18 AM (mrk0R)
New MPJ Category!
That’s right! In our quest to totally foul up TJR while Rusty is on vacation, Vinnie and I have added a new category. While working on this email a terrorist thread I noticed just how much stuff we have on Omar Bakri Muhammad.
Omar is a radical cleric who has been linked to al-Qaeda and other terror organizations and plots.
When compiling these I have to get the post title and then google that to get the url, quite a pain in the arse. So, to make my life easier, our Editor in Chief, Vinnie added a new category for me. Without further delay I present to you the new category:
Great name huh? I figure it goes right along with the spirit and intent of MPJ. It will take some time to get all the posts moved under that category. Maybe forever, but until that time we will work diligently to accumulate all the posts on old goat humper into this one place. I’ve added a few already. You can access MPJ categories on the left sidebar.
The same server that contains Omar, The Goat Humping, Bakri Muhammad’s website also contains a number of Jihadi forums and websites. It has encryption, encryption hacking, hack tools, DDOS, various other worms and virus sites and a porn site. It is the remnants of a former ISP that specialized in carrying Jihadi websites and information. One of the websites was a favorite of the Madrid bombers.
I’m sure many of our British readers will be interested to know the same spew that resulted in the tube attacks is still being broadcast over the internet from Britain.
I’m not posting all the URLs for the sites due to the malicious software sites. But I can send them by request. I’ll try and keep you updated as best I can.
Hopefully these sites can be taken down and this provider found and prosecuted.
As a reminder of what the purpose of these sites are, here is a video of Omar, The Goat Humping, Bakri Muhammad talking about the UBL and the 7/7 London attacks before they happened.
Bakri is a menace to society. Why he is allowed to preach his garbage whilst living on the British taxpayer is unbelievable. I will be voting BNP in the next election as will many of my friends. We are just average Brits who have had enough of these muslims taking the piss in our country.
In some ways we are wasting our time fighting in Iraq, the war should begin here at home by putting these arrogant muslims bastards in their place.
Posted by: Jester at March 14, 2007 02:34 PM (iwtIO)
The idea is to get it high enough on google that when the bastard looks himself up (trust me he will, his ego is too big not top) he or his followers find this.
Posted by: Howie at March 14, 2007 05:02 PM (YHZAl)
4
Nice idea Howie. The hate speech on his site towards "infidels" is surely enough to have him arrested under UK law....well maybe not as most UK law protects everyone except white folk.
Posted by: Jester at March 14, 2007 05:55 PM (iwtIO)
5
Oh you racist you. Don't you know better than to tell the truth. You are now branded a Nazi, racist, KKK'r, bigot and perhaps even a Republican.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 06:15 PM (W7E9s)
6
Greyrooster. Check out Omar Bakri Dipshit's site if you want to see one ugly muslim sonofabitch.
Posted by: Jester at March 14, 2007 06:20 PM (iwtIO)
7
I'm going to start a collection of ugly muslim inman pictures. Damn, I sitting here opeining my mail and I just got a check from Coastal Electric for $500.00. Says it's for a Comfort Advantage Retrofit. What the hell is that? I'd better not ask.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 07:27 PM (W7E9s)
8
The email a terrorist thread that this post updated is #1 on google news and # 10 on google. I linked it back to this one. Yeeehaaa !!!!
Posted by: Darth Odie at March 14, 2007 10:08 PM (YHZAl)
The email to report abuse to his web provider is :abuse@pacific.net.hk
As always, be nice, try and engage the terrorist mu-slime scumbag. Call him your brother. Act interested, eager to learn. Talk a little about the, “Zionist Crusaders.â€
If you receive a reply forward, do not cut and paste, to Rusty at mypetjawa (at) gmail (dot) com immediately. Afterward, when Rusty is finished doing what he does, we’ll give you the, “all clear to flameâ€, signal.
1
I didn't want to make a comment, just read some.
Oh, hell. I e-mailed omar and dissed his f*#ing prophet. Maybe he will come looking for me; I am ready.
Posted by: cruz8r at March 12, 2007 07:15 PM (OKkcV)
Posted by: Howie at March 13, 2007 07:22 PM (YHZAl)
7
Actually they sometimes do answer. I know a few things about a few things that have to do with these posts. It works now and then. Some "people" got back to me, the server with this webisite is quite interesting. Lots of stuff. I'll post some on it later.
Posted by: Howie at March 14, 2007 09:16 AM (YHZAl)
Video: British Muslim Praises & Laughs at 9/11
In this video a follower of Omar Bakri Mohammed laughs about 9/11. I mean really laughs. He seems to think of the greatest act of terrorism in U.S. history as a side-splittingly good time.
You'll also notice that he compares the hijacked planes several times to "when pigs fly". He says they use the same term in Arabic. I'm not sure whether he's referring to the passengers murdered on that day as pigs or whether he's simply using the phrase to make the point that September 11th was the long awaited, and unexptected by many, day when Muslims finally rose up and gave America its up-and-comings. My gut feeling is that he means it in both ways, but the thick accent makes it difficult to really follow him.
In any event, there is one thing that he gets right: 9/11 was a day when pigs were flying. But the pigs were the hijackers and mass murdering followers of al Qaeda. The biggest pig of all was Mohammed Atta.
Can any one identify the man in the video? Glen Jenvey identifies him as an "al Qaeda member", but I'd say it was more accurate to call him an "al Qaeda sympathizer". What I do know for sure is that he's a follower of Omar Bakri Mohammed. And a pig.
Exit question: Does Allah let flying pigs into paradise
1
Wel there is YouShit for,.. for all kinds of imbeciles.
Posted by: Dan at March 09, 2007 01:14 PM (ILHet)
2
Everytime I see one of these evil immigrant bastards spouting in the West, I always wonder 1) Why they're not in prison and 2) If they're not in prison, why they're not dead.
It's time the West starts waking up and dealing with the problem.
Posted by: MidnightSun at March 09, 2007 02:25 PM (8t7Mg)
3
He is obviously a sick and evil creature. He needs to receive justice. USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 09, 2007 07:37 PM (2OHpj)
4
Pretty sick stuff. There's plenty of these preachers in the UK who've made similar comments. The UK just needs to do what we would do, deport them.
Posted by: Bobby Boeche at March 10, 2007 04:07 PM (kaMd2)
UK Bigley Beheading Supporter IdentifiedThe U.K. Muslim seen on a video supporting the beheading of British hostage Kenneth Bigley has been identified as Abdul Rahman Saleem, also known as Abu Yahya. Unsurprisingly, he is a follower of exiled British cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed.
I Googled his name and came up with a reference to him, right here at The Jawa Report. It seems that he was one of the characters behind a protest at the Danish embassy in which Muslims were seen advocating "Behead those who insult Islam":
Abdul Rahman Saleem, 31, of Poplar, (aka Abu Yahya) denied one count of using words likely to stir up racial hatred.
I don't know about "using words likely to stir up racial hatred," but his explicit endorsement of the beheading of civilian hostages in this video certainly seems like something much worse.
At the cartoon protest, Saleem was videotaped chanting:
"7/7 on its way" and "Europe you will pay with your blood" (Telegraph)
Saleem was convicted on the charges and is, from what I gather, free on bail until his April sentencing hearing.
1
Is there any way this guy be given a taste of his own medicine? i.e. behead him, at least until his April sentencing hearing. That should teach him a thing or two about the proper use of words.
Posted by: busywwolf at March 07, 2007 07:17 PM (qqRYP)
2
There are a few guys in Liverpool who would like to meet this coward. A bag of cement and a new home on the bed of the Mersey await him.
Posted by: Jester at March 07, 2007 07:47 PM (iwtIO)
3
He will probably get probation to avoid stiring up the rest of the muslim trash in England.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 07, 2007 10:06 PM (wTIrf)
4
England used to have a pretty stiff way of taking care of things like that. They were a tough people, long history of it. I don't understand why they walked away from that. This is the canary in the mine for the US policies that put pc over common sense.
Posted by: wb at March 07, 2007 10:35 PM (hiEju)
5
Hey Rooster,
You might want to take note that you got censored from the dumbass broad ( there goes this one) who hooked up with a camel jockey and the complained about being treated like a ..... dumbass broad who hooked up with a camel jockey post. Seems it's okay to say anything you want as long as it doesn't reflect negatively on the masters of the board or their pets. Calling for the death of 100's of millions is fine, but don't call a dumb bitch a stupid bitch for being a dumb ass. Pulled in 4-3-2-1......
Posted by: wb at March 07, 2007 11:36 PM (hiEju)
6
Yea: Theres a few muslim huggers here who have been indoctrinated and so called educated by the muslim hugging liberals. Saying the truth has nothing to do with the comments on some posts. Shit! Isn't that how the moderators on the pro muslim blogs act. Hide the truth, protect your ideas and frig anyone elses.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 08, 2007 07:42 AM (wTIrf)
7
A few months ago the posters were trying to collect money for some muslim woman because her husband had been kidnapped. Of course the poster used the phase (American woman in Detroit has husband kidnapped). I asked the question what was the man doing in Iraq and was he a muslim? Seemed like a good question to me. In that I was being asked to contribute may easily earned money to her. DELETE, DELETE, DELETE. Don't question. So friggin obvious. And where the hell is Jeff and the lowlife osamaisawigger?
Posted by: greyrooster at March 08, 2007 08:02 AM (wTIrf)
Video of UK Imam: Ken Bigley Murder JustifiedIn this video, a British Muslim cleric discusses the beheading murder of Ken Bigley. He justifies Bigley's murder as an act of war, even though Ken Bigley was being held hostage at the time. Ironically, Bigley's murder was said to be in retaliation for the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. Abusing Muslim prisoners=bad; beheading infidel hostages=not bad.
Kenneth Bigley was in Iraq as a civilian engineer when he was captured by Abu Musab al Zarqawi's "Tawhid wal Jihad", later changed to "al Qaeda in Iraq". Several hostage propaganda videos were released in which Bigley was seen wearing the orange jumpsuit of Abu Ghraib and in which he made demands on the the Blair government for his release. In his last video, Kenneth Bigley is seen making more demands on Tony Blair and seems to be unaware that the man standing behind him, Abu Musab al Zarqawi, is about to murder him.
UPDATE: Jeremy Reynalds identifies the man as Abdul Rahman Saleem. Where have you heard that name before? He is the follower of Omar Bakri Mohammed who was put on trial for his part in the Mohammed cartoon protests when he advocated murdering blasphemers. He pleaded not guilty, of course.
We are not sure the name of the person justifying the murder of Ken Bigley, but another video, recorded at the same time, shows that just to the speaker's left sits a more familiar character: Abu Izzadeen. The speaker, then, is most likely a follower of Omar Bakri Mohammed.
Izzadeen is under indictment in the U.K. for inciting terrorism, but as far as we can tell the speaker in this video is walking around the streets of London or Birmingham inciting more Muslims to commit acts of murder, terrorism, or treason. Bakri Mohammed's followers in Britain unanimously support recruiting for jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yes, they want British Muslims to fight British troops--the very definition of treason.
In the video, the speaker justifies Kenneth Bigley's murder on the grounds that Bigley was in Iraq to help fix military hardware which would then be used to "kill Muslims". This is not true. Kenneth Bigley, Jack Hensley, and Eugene Armstrong were in Iraq to work on civilian reconstruction efforts. They were there helping Muslims. It is al Qaeda in Iraq that continues to murder Muslims to this day.
The speaker then says Bigley was in Iraq to "steal the money of the Muslims". Which, of course, is also patently untrue. Ken Bigley was being paid by the U.S. government to help the Iraqis rebuild their country so that Muslims in Iraq would have a functioning economy so that they could earn money for themselves. It is those that murdered Ken Bigley that steal money from Muslims by blowing up Iraq's infrastructure.
The speaker, in what seems to be a bit of "humor", warns that people involved in the reconstruction effort--or, as he deems it, "stealing from Muslims"---should "mind your head". No doubt, a reference to the dozens of civilians beheaded by al Qaeda and other jihadi groups in Iraq.
Last, even though Bigley "converted" to Islam at the point of a knife, the speaker reiterates that since Islam forbids forced conversions, then Bigley must have become a Muslim of his own free will. See if you follow that sick and twisted logic? And if that is the case, even though the speaker does not say it in this video, those listening would undoubtedly understand another reason why his murder was "justified". To the Salafi jihadi mind, Muslims helping the U.S. and U.K. in Iraq are "traitors".
To get some ideas for yourself on how you can help, see Jeremy Reynald's book: Fighting the Online Jihad.
The video is below. If you saw the video of Kenneth Bigley being murdered, you might want to remove any objects from your reach that can be thrown at your computer.
more...
1
Those who murdered Bigley, Armstrong and Hensley were cowards. I would like to find this muslim piece of shit and start by kicking the crap out of him. Muslims out of the UK now...we have had enough of you and your fucked religion.
Posted by: Jester at March 06, 2007 04:12 PM (iwtIO)
Howie e-mailed this story earlier this morning (another story here) which claims a new video threatens soccer superstars David Beckham, Wayne Rooney and Thierry Henry. The video is also said to threaten singers Justin Timberlake, Usher, M&M, and P. Diddy. 
This IHT report, also published in the New York Times, portrays Omar Bakri Mohammed as a man who has moderated his views and who is trying to promote peace between the Lebanese government and the al Qaeda linked Fatah al Islam fighters holed up in Palestinian villages. I was stunned, literally stunned, when I read that Bakri Mahammed was actually promoting himself as a peacemaker between the two sides. He further had the audacity to advise clerics not to say that the Lebanese Army was an apostate force. As AllahP put it in his link to it yesterday, whitewash -- indeed.
Four of the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed have been jailed in Britain for their role in attempting to incite violence at a protest over cartoons depicting Mohammed.
As we announced previously, the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed were out in force today demonstrating against the arrest of six of their bretheren for supporting terrorism. Predictably, the media covering the event reprints their public lies. 
***sticky***scroll down for newer**
More arrests in the London 7/7 bombings today. 7/7 has been called the U.K.'s 9/11. 52 passengers on various public transportaion lines in London were murdered on that day by Muslims inpired by al Qaeda. Police in Britain believe that al Qaeda may have been involved in both the planning and funding of the mass murder.
In this video, a British Muslim cleric discusses the beheading murder of Ken Bigley. He justifies Bigley's murder as an act of war, even though Ken Bigley was being held hostage at the time. Ironically, Bigley's murder was said to be in retaliation for the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. Abusing Muslim prisoners=bad; beheading infidel hostages=not bad. 
