January 23, 2007
4. Hamas - since sugar daddy Saddam's necktie party, the brave jihadi babyhunters of Hamas could use some support.
3. Hezbollah - Hamas' Lebanese cousins would welcome a nice training/recruitment site.
2. The Mainstream Media - reporting from Iraq is expensive; the sooner the MSM can begin ignoring the inevitable Vietnam/style bloodbath they've worked so hard to bring about, the better for their profit margins.
1. The Democratic Party - ever an organization to sacrifice truth, justice, and the American way on the altar of political expediency, the donkeys haven't had so much fun since the glory days of the Ku Klux Klan.
Posted by: Bluto at
12:43 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
Bluto
Bluto
The Democratic Party is now the choice of most Americans. We are not hoping for a failed state to replace Iraq, but it seems that under current policies of Bush this is becoming more likely, if it has not already occured.
Posted by: John Ryan at January 23, 2007 02:28 PM (1dOeJ)
we alread know those talking points. But tell me why only last year Pelosi was blaming Rumsfeld for too few troops in Iraq, but now she's against more troops. The only explanation I have is Bluto's argument about Democrat political expediency. Do you have another one?
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 23, 2007 02:43 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos
Nice try sir, but no dice. We DID have too few troops in Iraq to start and finish the job. Once the Bush administration trained more terrorists over the last 12 -24 months, the situation spiraled out of control - where it is today. Now because of the terrorist training program being accomplished, we are outgunned and outnumbered.
Posted by: Tom at January 23, 2007 05:01 PM (2/n6+)
so last year more troops was good policy, but this year it isn't because in only ONE YEAR the terrorists managed to train enough people to outgun us so now it's too late. LOL. I know you don't really believe that. Great spin though!
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 23, 2007 05:15 PM (8e/V4)
mistaken-and Iran has been much stengthened by the neocon
war.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at January 23, 2007 06:30 PM (EPkr9)
Hamas received more support from Iran than Saddam, if I'm not
mistaken-and Iran has been much stengthened by the neocon
war.
Then you must love the neocons.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 23, 2007 07:35 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Feist at January 23, 2007 08:29 PM (cUUvl)
Better luck next time, scum-holes.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 23, 2007 10:11 PM (abVz3)
Posted by: greyrooster at January 24, 2007 12:47 AM (w+w6p)
I came up with a list for Democrats so they can remember
what they stand for (their stances change every 37 days).
Things liberals hate: America,
President George W. Bush, children (born and unborn), puppies, Abraham Lincoln,
America, me, you, country music, America, the military, the 'issues,' kittens, poor people,
freedom, America, logic, speech, Israel, fishing, America, minorities, Christians,
the pursuit of happiness, wit, subtlety, courage, America, anybody different
than them, etc.
Things liberals love: hypocrisy, FDR, JFK, LBJ (own Vietnam…OWN
IT!) MSM, MTV, terrorism, monkey poop,
Starbucks, the Daily Show, any country that is not America,
the Gap.
Laminate this and put it in your pocket so that when your
indoctrinator, I mean college professor asks you what you stand for, you can
pull this out, recite your list and earn your ‘A.’
Posted by: Feist at January 24, 2007 11:44 AM (cUUvl)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 24, 2007 09:41 PM (eGb9y)
34 queries taking 0.0453 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
