October 30, 2006
BAGHDAD, Iraq – Coalition Forces killed a terrorist Saturday morning and detained an individual responsible for the movement of foreign fighters into Iraq during a raid south of Baghdad.Artist's conception of the cross-dressing terrorist.
Saturday’s raid was part of an ongoing effort to diminish al-Qaeda in Iraq car bombing capabilities in the Baghdad area. During October, Coalition Forces detained eight other key players and 15 known associates.
During the raid, eight insurgents attempted to flee the area and ground forces were able to safely detain them. Forces detained two others without incident. The targeted terrorist was disguised as a woman in an attempt to avoid being detained.
As the Coalition Forces were preparing to depart with the detainees, they received small arms fire from a terrorist and ground forces returned fire, killing the terrorist.
Posted by: Bluto at
04:56 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at October 30, 2006 06:14 PM (vixLB)
Posted by: SeeMonk at October 30, 2006 09:23 PM (n4VvM)
Why don't we just stay the course and let our kids remain sitting ducks like they have for the past three years? Why sent them spare parts and keep them riding around in unarmored vehicles. Why not paint a big red bullseye on them?
Oh yes, let's keep killing those terrorists over there so they just get to hate us even more over here.
I say we throw Bush and Cheney outside the green zone and let them fend for themselves. Let them experience how much of a "cakewalk" their little war has become.
Posted by: civilbehavior at October 30, 2006 10:11 PM (PzURS)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at October 30, 2006 10:31 PM (2OHpj)
What level of hate do you consider acceptable?
Douchebag - they've hated us for decades!!!
Posted by: Max Power at October 30, 2006 11:06 PM (PM8kH)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at October 30, 2006 11:48 PM (vBK4C)
And I refuse to lower my self to calling you cynical, low-life douchebags. I won't do it.
Posted by: Gleep! at October 31, 2006 12:10 AM (a7sMc)
And don't think I'm questioning your patriotism, Gleep, because I don't believe that you have loyalty to anything greater than your party.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at October 31, 2006 12:45 AM (vBK4C)
Posted by: Big White Infidel at October 31, 2006 01:52 AM (WyDGG)
to spin it as anything else. Lefturds are gutless cowards at best, and
traitors at worst, and in either even, we shouldn't allow them to
breathe our air one second longer.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 31, 2006 06:17 AM (v3I+x)
That guy is going to be very popular in whatever detention center they're taking him to, his new name can be Betty.
Posted by: MidnightSun at October 31, 2006 09:53 AM (AiuZK)
yawn...
and...I'll lower myself as low as it takes to look you in your rat eyes and call you the dumbfuck piece of shit you are.
Uday and Qusay called from hell - the circle jerks there just aren't as much fun without you.
Posted by: Greater Houston Iliteracy Foundation at October 31, 2006 02:20 PM (R4293)
Damn democratic of you. Is that anything remotely associated with dissent protected by the constitution?
Oh yes, we belong over there explaining just how a democracy does it your way. "carpet bomb everything south and start out the country brand fresh and new". Oh yes,let's do it your way and THEN implement democracy. Is that the "benchmark" for victory?
Bluto, And obviously it's ok by you for us to have Americans killed on their soil as long as you don't have to witness it huh? Out of your line of sight and you reconcile it as something ok for the civilians in Iraq who are receiving blow after blow due to our invasion. Maybe if it was happening here you idiots would figure out that it might be something along with your macho bully image over there that is creating this mess. Of course, they're just them, Iraqi's, not us Americans, huh? Then again,maybe you wouldn't realize it.
FOOLISH Americans......
Posted by: civilbehavior at October 31, 2006 02:58 PM (PzURS)
Do you honestly think you're going to fool anybody into believing you care about American troops? We all know you despise them. The left's feigned concern for US troops is nothing but a thinly veiled ploy to disguise its opposition to any excercise of American Military power.
The American casualty figure is what you care about. You get aroused every time it rises.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at October 31, 2006 08:33 PM (bLPT+)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at October 31, 2006 08:35 PM (bLPT+)
Posted by: Gleep! at November 01, 2006 12:31 AM (a7sMc)
Posted by: Gleep! at November 01, 2006 12:36 AM (a7sMc)
HOW TO BECOME RICH HOW TO TURN SIX DOLLARS INTO MILLIONS OF DOLLARS: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE! IT DOES WORK! I found this on a bulletin board and decided to try it.
So I thought, "Yeah right, this must be a scam", but like most of us, I was curious, so I kept reading. Anyway, it said that you send $1.00 to each of the 6 names and address stated in the article. You then place your own name and address in the bottom of the list at #6, and post the article in at least 250 newsgroups. (There are thousands) No catch, that was it. So after thinking it overI thought about trying it. I figured: "what have I got to lose except 6 stamps and $6.00, right?" Then I invested the measly $6.00 (I use the word "measly" because $6 really is measly compared to the money I have made through the initial investment). Well GUESS WHAT!?... within 7 days, I started getting money in the mail! I was shocked! I figured it would end soon, but the money just kept coming in. In my first week, I made about $25.00. By the end of the second week I had made a total of over $1,000! In the third week I had over $10,000 and it's still growing. This is now my fourth week and I have made a total of just over $42,000 and it's still coming in rapidly. It's certainly worth $6.00, and 6 stamps, I have spent more than that on the lottery!! NOTE: Please follow these directions EXACTLY, and $50,000 or more can be yours in 20 to 60 days. This program remains successful because of the honesty and integrity of the participants.STEP 1:
: Get 6 separate pieces of paper and write the following on each piece of paper "PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR MAILING LIST."Mail the 6 envelopes to the following addresses:
:1.. AJ Armbrust3731 Grand AvenueDuluth, MN 55807
2.Steve Wehvila3155 Vernon St.Duluth, MN 55806
3.James Rush621QueenAvenueMinneapolis,MN55411
4.Liz Grice 3413 Harvard ave. Columbia, SC 29205
5.Eng. Yousef Abu Hadhoud P.O. Box 4028 North Hashemi, Amman - Jordan
6.Juliet Barriola 225 west 232cd street apt.2E Bronx, New York 10463
STEP 2:
: Now take the #1 name off the list that you see above, move the other names up (6 becomes 5, 5 becomes 4, etc...) and add YOUR Name as number 6 on the list.
STEP 3:
: Change anything you need to, but try to keep this article as close to original as possible. Now, post your amended article to at least 250 newsgroups You won't get very much unless you post like crazy. PLEASE REMEMBER that this program remains successful because of the honesty and integrity of the participants and by their carefully adhering to the directions. So, as each post is downloaded and the directions carefully followed, six members will be reimbursed for their participation as a List Developer with one dollar each. Your name will move up the list geometrically so that when your name reaches the #1 position you will be receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in CASH!!! What an opportunity for only $6.00 ($1.00 for each of the first six people listed above) Send it now, add your own name to the list and you're in business!
Out of 250 postings, say I receive only 5 replies (a very low example). So then I made $5.00 with my name at #6 on the letter. Now, each of the 5 persons who just sent me $1.00 make the MINIMUM 250 postings, each with my name at #5 and only 5 persons respond to each of the original 5, that is another $25.00 for me, now those 25 each make 250 MINIMUM posts with my name at #4 and only 5 replies each, I will bring in an additional $125! Now, those 125 persons turn around and post the MINIMUM 250 with my name at #3 and only receive 5 replies each, I will make an additional $626! OK, now here is the fun part, each of those 625 persons post a MINIMUM 250 letters with my name at #2 and they each only receive 5 replies, that just made me $3,1250!!!
Posted by: JANE123** at November 01, 2006 10:56 AM (INxhg)
Posted by: gljbofmu dawnfy at April 05, 2007 10:33 AM (7dcL3)
October 26, 2006
From the Drudge Report:
– Lost Soldiers: “A shirtless man walked toward them along a mud pathway. His muscles were young and hard, but his face was devastated with wrinkles. His eyes were so red that they appeared to be burned by fire. A naked boy ran happily toward him from a little plot of dirt. The man grabbed his young son in his arms, turned him upside down, and put the boy’s penis in his mouth.â€Via Jay at Stop the ACLU, who points out that Right Wing News had the story first, posting similar passages on September 29th.– Something to Die For: "Fogarty . . . watch[ed] a naked young stripper do the splits over a banana. She stood back up, her face smiling proudly and her round breasts glistening from a spotlight in the dim bar, and left the banana on the bar, cut in four equal sections by the muscles of her vagina."
Posted by: Bluto at
09:52 PM
| Comments (34)
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.
Emergency !
Somebody call the sex police at Interested Participant !
Pechar needs another woody !
Posted by: Mike Hunt at October 26, 2006 11:07 PM (HSkSw)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 26, 2006 11:17 PM (8e/V4)
Personally, I'm a very conservative and
traditional but I think trying to smear a person because they write action novels with racy sex scenes is ridiculous and I don't think a publisher in this day and age would buy an action novel from a writer without some sort of racy sex scene. Sex and violence sells and he wasn't writing philosophy.
Is the Allen campaign
now the thought police? His fiction is nothing to be proud of, but smearing him for some sort of impropriety is like criticizing someone's daydream. What happened to freedom ?
What a bunch of crap.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at October 26, 2006 11:56 PM (0muHk)
type story but this is more then fair game in this viscous political
campaign. If Allen can be dammed for the left's conceptualization of
the extemporaneous "Macca" comment than Webb's "boy and the penis"
authorship can be held to the same standard as a political cudgel.
Posted by: Randman at October 27, 2006 01:09 AM (Sal3J)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 27, 2006 01:10 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at October 27, 2006 01:32 AM (Dd86v)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 27, 2006 01:46 AM (eqF9P)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 27, 2006 01:48 AM (eqF9P)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 27, 2006 01:51 AM (eqF9P)
"Looking over his shoulder, he entered the cave with stealth. The moist evening air was thick with anticipation. He noticed him lying there. The bright Afghanistan moonlight glistening upon his bare bronzed buttocks. Jumbo quietly whispered, "as Allah has said (PBUH) if the meat is left uncovered...shall not the cat eat it?" He moaned passionately. Finally, he could take it no longer and blurted out "Osama, you wild donkey of a man, come away with me and there will be unimaginable delights as we frolic together and hack off heads" Jumbo gently lifted Osama upside down and put his penis into his mouth...
Posted by: Daniel at October 27, 2006 01:58 AM (AMccd)
Reading that passage left me with a sick feeling in my stomach. Is Webb a member of NAMBLA? BTW, Daniel, very funny! Rooster, have a nice hangover!!
Posted by: Stan the Infidel in Indonesia at October 27, 2006 04:49 AM (yyH7u)
to some extent on you. Freedom, sez you? Fine, sez I, but this man is
running for an extremely important political office, and as such has
put himself in a position in which he has little expectation of freedom
to do as he pleases without close inspection. Put yourself on the
public stage, and you're gonna get looked at; if We the People don't like what we see, then thanks for playing.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 27, 2006 06:34 AM (v3I+x)
Heroic Dreamer: Only a very sick mind would think of what he wrote. Racy sex scene. More like depraved sicko scene. This guy is probably jealous of Mark Foley and worse. I mean, would a normal mind even thing of something like that? I disagree that such revolting garbage needs to be in a book to sell it.
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 27, 2006 07:45 AM (ckgG5)
Posted by: n.a. palm at October 27, 2006 08:52 AM (YNymC)
The second one is, well, kinda hot.
I wouldn't voted for him anyway.
Posted by: Spade at October 27, 2006 09:32 AM (MwlDS)
to bring it up. It's fiction. A "story". However,
he's made remarks otherwise that leave me disturbed enough. But
alas, I'm not in his state so voting for or against him isn't an issue.
Posted by: Oyster at October 27, 2006 02:32 PM (BGgmD)
What's that supposed to mean? You own "conservative" now? Self righteousness is not a good path to go down. I say this not for my sake, but kindly, for yours.
IM: you have a point. he put himself in the public spot light. But I think smearing someone because of their fiction - FICTION - sucks. What's next? while he was sleeping he had a dirty dream?
That's why it bothers me.
This entire campaign is disgusting.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at October 27, 2006 02:57 PM (0muHk)
Posted by: Ay Uaxe at October 27, 2006 02:57 PM (vq8KZ)
It just seems to me that over the years campaigns went from discussing the issue, to discussing the candidate's personal life, and now, we discuss a candidate's fantasy life. It goes too far. Surely there is a better way to show the character and make of a man then by criticizing his creative writing.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at October 27, 2006 03:11 PM (0muHk)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at October 27, 2006 03:32 PM (Dd86v)
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at October 27, 2006 03:55 PM (vixLB)
Posted by: n.a. palm at October 27, 2006 04:39 PM (YNymC)
Posted by: Gleep! at October 27, 2006 11:06 PM (a7sMc)
you'd all be pissing all over yourselves and denounching him as a
racist, but books by a lefturd about sexual deviancy, including
pederastic incest, are just fine. What the hell is wrong with you
people? If you all are conservatives, then I'm sure as hell not a
conservative. I expect to hear dumb shit like that from gregturd, but
not the rest of you.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 27, 2006 11:56 PM (v3I+x)
For the record, the only person on this thread equating homosexuality to pedophilia is the Liberal. It's the same kind of gay bashing for political ends we saw during the Foley scandal.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 28, 2006 08:25 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Dill Doe at October 28, 2006 09:06 AM (HSkSw)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 28, 2006 09:19 AM (9pOO/)
to pedophilia is the Liberal. It's the same kind of gay bashing for
political ends we saw during the Foley scandal.
Nah, JC, we're talking about using people's imaginations and artistic license against them in cheap political ploys.
According to Webb, he saw this kind of behavior take place in Southeast
Asia during the war. He then included something along the lines of it in a passage from him book. So exactly what is
this supposed to tell us about Webb, according to Mr. Allen that is?
That Webb is himself a pedophile? That he thinks pedophelia is really
cool and OK? What?
No, what we have now is called the "Questionable Content Move" and is being used against a man who's been proving his intellect and his worth for 35 years by a political hoodlum.
I'm calling it would it has always been called: hypocricy from the sanctimonius.
I also called this Foley thing the bunch of crap it is from day one, although he didn't write about what he did, he actually carried it out. Still a non-issue to me.
Like I said to you once before, JC; please don't insincerely defend homosexuals as part of your arguing tacts; you don't reallly have it in you (no pun inteneded.)
Posted by: Gleep! at October 28, 2006 10:32 AM (a7sMc)
Leftist advocates in an obsessive pursuit of "gay rights," abortion, and hedonism have focused the national dialogue for too long on morality issues. Christian conservatives have responded in kind by focusing on morality issues and advocating their position. Despite Republican majorities in both houses, the traditional conservative mandate to shrink government is largely ignored. The country's overwhelming desire to see increased border security is ignored. Instead, we obsess on embryonic stem cells, gay marriage and now, bad fiction.
Why do conservatives let the lunatics frame the discussion??
A campaign frames and refines the national discussion and in many ways the future direction of our government. A worthy opponent and a worthy debate/fight for office provides a foundation for leadership and consensus with regards to direction and tone for the future office.
So the Republicans in the Allen/Webb race have chosen to frame the debate around violent/sadistic fiction. To win. And then what? They wake up and become prudent and thoughtful? They wake up victors after the battle and provide a check on man's anarchic impulses and the innovator/revolutionary's lust for power?
We need real leaders. We need a Patton, a Churchill - someone strong and able - will such a person put up with their private papers being rifled through?
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at October 28, 2006 10:36 AM (0muHk)
Liberals believe in the "perfectibility" of man - which leads to the belief that communism can work if only the right people are in charge.
Conservatives recognize that both good and evil exists in the hearts of men and that government and individual rights need to provide a check on evil, anarchistic or power grubbing instincts.
It is a trap for the conservatives to go after the fiction of someone because it inherently implies that there exists a man who does not have a heart of darkness, that perfectibility on earth is possible. As every conservative, and Christian, should know this is not true.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at October 28, 2006 10:47 AM (0muHk)
ethnic cleansing as a strategy of war. Would that be a valid issue of
debate should I ever run for election, or should my hobby not reflect
on my campaign? Discuss.
Oh, and remember that your positions are all recorded, so beware the double-edged sword of hypocrisy.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 28, 2006 05:59 PM (v3I+x)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 28, 2006 07:39 PM (Sc2TP)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at October 29, 2006 05:43 PM (bLPT+)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at October 31, 2006 08:31 AM (Dd86v)
October 17, 2006
As this message is posted, I have apppeared on the Ed Schultz Show, a nationally syndicated radio program broadcast in more than 100 cities and on Sirius Satellite. On the show I have called on Senator Larry Craig to end his years of hypocrisy by leveling with Idahoans about who he really is. I am also calling upon several prominent Idaho social conservative leaders to ask them how they square their anti-gay positions with their support for this leader.But Patterico notes that Craig denies the charge. And Rogers is using the old "anonymous source" dodge.
Photo of Rogers. WARNING: this man is as ugly as his soul, not for the squeamish.
Via Emperor Misha I of The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler, who has a marvelous rant, and doesn't care if Craig "...is as gay as a tree full of monkeys on nitrous oxide."
Posted by: Bluto at
10:03 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 1 kb.
October 16, 2006
Over the summer I had a hysterectomy, and um, I got my “parts†back. I thought I could just [inaudible] on eBay, you know, “[inaudible] Cindy Sheehan’s uterus.†And so I planted it in the garden where the bush, it’s a pretty bush… It’s so funny ’cause me and my children, we’ll always be a part of, of Crawford, Texas. Long after people forgot the horror of the Bush regime, long after, you know, we’re forgotten. We’ll always, our DNA will always be in the land…â€Rusty wants to know, "What's gonna grow". I'd say mushrooms, or some other loathesome fungus.
Posted by: Bluto at
12:32 PM
| Comments (38)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Stan the Infidel in Indonesia at October 16, 2006 02:09 PM (/Pdne)
Posted by: CanForce 101 at October 16, 2006 02:09 PM (xfvyZ)
Posted by: Sapper Chris at October 16, 2006 02:13 PM (ZEIBc)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 16, 2006 02:17 PM (syuk5)
Posted by: Scrapiron at October 16, 2006 02:28 PM (XXEg4)
Posted by: SeeMonk at October 16, 2006 02:34 PM (7teJ9)
Posted by: whatsinna at October 16, 2006 02:59 PM (ckQml)
Posted by: Kim at October 16, 2006 03:10 PM (SUuFZ)
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 16, 2006 03:15 PM (rUyw4)
All the world could have gone on without missing a beat if knowing what anyone does with their uterus was kept quiet. W.T.H.
She and her supporters (enablers?) need to get a grip.
Posted by: JeepThang at October 16, 2006 03:30 PM (yZQoS)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 16, 2006 03:31 PM (8e/V4)
... which will unfortunately resemble bunches of dead uteruses with Cindy's face on 'em and fuck the whole thing up.
Posted by: Gleep! at October 16, 2006 04:15 PM (UHKaK)
Posted by: Venom at October 16, 2006 04:19 PM (gyr2M)
Posted by: Gleep! at October 16, 2006 04:21 PM (UHKaK)
Posted by: HelloNurse at October 16, 2006 04:36 PM (/3wzR)
Posted by: Graeme at October 16, 2006 04:51 PM (QrfUb)
Posted by: RepJ at October 16, 2006 05:13 PM (rqlgb)
Posted by: ken at October 16, 2006 05:16 PM (hFZJx)
Posted by: Eric J at October 16, 2006 05:17 PM (5PRM2)
Posted by: Cdat at October 16, 2006 06:17 PM (1ISxl)
Posted by: SeeMonk at October 16, 2006 07:27 PM (n4VvM)
Posted by: Melissa In Texas at October 16, 2006 07:32 PM (bbxLM)
I smell a very foul odor and since her mouth is open, it must be Cindy.
Posted by: middleagedhousewife at October 16, 2006 08:12 PM (O2SW8)
Yeah, I can see that happening. Guess I was wrong in my earlier post. Sorry, yall.
Posted by: middleagedhousewife at October 16, 2006 08:19 PM (O2SW8)
Posted by: Filthy Allah at October 16, 2006 09:18 PM (2eV7i)
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at October 16, 2006 10:21 PM (FES9D)
Posted by: Ranba Ral at October 17, 2006 12:22 AM (VvXII)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at October 17, 2006 01:39 AM (Dd86v)
http://www.econetwork.net/~wildmansteve/Mushrooms.Folder/Elegant%20Stinkhorn.html
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 17, 2006 02:33 AM (v3I+x)
Posted by: FrauBudgie at October 17, 2006 04:44 AM (pbvwt)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at October 17, 2006 01:27 PM (Dd86v)
I predict that a giant Treponema Pallidum will sprout from her rotting uterus. 
*shrugs* How else do you explain her level of insanity?
Posted by: PK at October 17, 2006 01:40 PM (hph70)
Posted by: gamongrel at October 17, 2006 04:25 PM (YAcZA)
Posted by: Xcam-1 at December 23, 2006 04:44 PM (ASLRs)
Posted by: Xcam-1 at December 27, 2006 08:31 AM (623RQ)
http://villasincrete.net/fucker
h70fa
http://arachno.name/t/161925
Posted by: lover at January 23, 2007 07:20 PM (YuVtd)
http://villasincrete.net/shpo_pharma
http://villasincrete.net/shpo_pharma
mqhdd
http://arachno.name/t/161925
Posted by: shop at January 27, 2007 06:46 PM (YuVtd)
http://villasincrete.net/hardcore
http://villasincrete.net/hardcore
t2lqp
http://arachno.name/t/161925
Posted by: hrad at January 29, 2007 05:29 PM (YuVtd)
October 13, 2006
From the Associated Press:
Air America Radio, a liberal talk and news radio network that features the comedian Al Franken, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, a network official told The AP.Who could have guessed that the market for retarded leftwing lunacy would crumble? I ask everyone to petition the US Department of the Interior and request that moonbats be placed on the endangered species list.The network had denied rumors just a month ago that it would file for bankruptcy. On Friday, Air America spokeswoman Jaime Horn told The Associated Press that the filing became necessary only recently after negotiations with a creditor from the company's early days broke down.
Posted by: Bluto at
09:52 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: n.a. palm at October 13, 2006 11:05 AM (EWjTF)
Posted by: QC at October 13, 2006 12:33 PM (PX+vn)
Radio is for people that are in their cars. They are in their cars performing tasks related to their employment. People with jobs that put them behind the wheel of a vehicle have more brain power than the idiots that believe the lies and hate spewed by the left.
I knew this would fail, I called it. It is the typical "guiding hand" philosophy of communisim. Talk radio arose to meet the demand of the market. It was NOT foisted upon the masses by some puppetmaster. The first talk show hosts were liberal jouralists, who were trounced in the ratings by conservatives.
I was thrilled to see all of these stupid evil jackasses pour there resources into a doomed project. That is capital wasted, never to be effectively spent to further their communist dreams.
Posted by: QC at October 13, 2006 12:44 PM (PX+vn)
I listened only a few times, and between the vulgarities, the obscenities, and the inanities, there was nothing but idle chatter about the weather. Otherwise just chewing gum for the left-wing mind [again, pardon the oxymoron].
But I watched an ultra-left professor at the U. of Minnesota-Duluth last night on The Factor and this obese idiot claimed Bush was behind the 9/11 disaster and had it staged with thousands of accomplices. UWis-Madison has an adjunct prof making his students buy a book touting the same insane lunacy.
Franken just moved to Minnesota, to be closer to his mental colleagues who elected the brain-challenged buffoon-wrestler Jesse Ventura. The dumb Swedes and Norwegians there eat lutefisk and adore Garrison Keillor. Something in the water, I guess. By the way, Minnesota and Wisconsin lakes are where the loon is found more than anywhere else. Coincidence?
Posted by: daveinboca at October 13, 2006 12:56 PM (dwXgo)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 13, 2006 04:28 PM (bqXT4)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 13, 2006 07:43 PM (bqXT4)
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu wer ik sorrrry litlte tipssy
youu poelpe are bashtars/. BASHTERS I SHAY
I ussed to have a job on shaturday nite life live I mean
bashters. hate you.
Posted by: Al Franken at October 13, 2006 08:58 PM (2LMpg)
Posted by: Wormpaste at October 14, 2006 02:09 AM (rtnQC)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 14, 2006 08:57 AM (v3I+x)
Posted by: Gleep! at October 14, 2006 11:17 AM (a7sMc)
Posted by: Gleep! at October 14, 2006 11:21 AM (a7sMc)
Posted by: Wormpaste at October 14, 2006 06:39 PM (rtnQC)
Posted by: Gleep! at October 15, 2006 09:28 AM (a7sMc)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 17, 2006 02:45 PM (Igoub)
October 08, 2006
Democrats, through their spokespersons in the mainstream media (especially ABC's Brian Ross, who has some...accuracy issues), have kept the controversy alive. One can only conclude that the Democratic Party is not merely politicizing this seamy episode, but has truly turned over a new leaf since the days of Reynolds, Studds, Franks, and Clinton. All Americans should take them at their word, that they are sincerely willing to do whatever it takes. After all, Masturgate is much more serious a threat to the Union than anything that might have happened in New York City, Washington D.C., or Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
(WARNING: lascivious photo of a young Britney Spears below the fold) more...
Posted by: Bluto at
06:11 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 468 words, total size 4 kb.
The correct name is: penile plethysmography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penile_plethysmograph
Of course, it can't be used on the Huskies or cornholers from Nebraska (don't make sizes that small).
Posted by: Darth Vag at October 08, 2006 07:30 PM (HSkSw)
Posted by: JD at October 08, 2006 08:36 PM (PnoGS)
Posted by: Darth Vag at October 08, 2006 09:05 PM (HSkSw)
Posted by: Gleep! at October 08, 2006 10:19 PM (RqYFa)
Posted by: tbone at October 08, 2006 10:31 PM (XDUhP)
Can we please just turn the pages on this whole nasty incident?
Posted by: All My Love, Rep. Mark Foley at October 08, 2006 10:49 PM (RqYFa)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at October 09, 2006 01:45 AM (Dd86v)
Of course, we could go back to talking about Iraq (PDF) and how well that's going.
Posted by: Rhyleh at October 09, 2006 03:21 AM (Q+ifs)
October 03, 2006
Gateway Pundit has the goods, specifically, a March 4, 2005 post from
BlogActive (screen capture).
Via Wild Bill at Passionate America.
Posted by: Bluto at
06:10 AM
| Comments (36)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
Now let's find out what the Dems knew, and how long they've known about it. Methinks this was timed for the elections so they shouldn't get off scott free either.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 03, 2006 06:29 AM (paKD6)
Posted by: SeeMonk at October 03, 2006 07:39 AM (7teJ9)
Posted by: actus at October 03, 2006 07:39 AM (NV0dI)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 03, 2006 07:47 AM (xJ3Xm)
The Republican blutocracy is trying to shift blame to the Dems.
Let's face it, both parties are rife with sleeze bags.
Power attracts perverts.
Vote Libertarian.
Posted by: Greg at October 03, 2006 08:32 AM (/+dAV)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 03, 2006 08:38 AM (xJ3Xm)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 03, 2006 08:41 AM (xJ3Xm)
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 03, 2006 09:18 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Howie at October 03, 2006 09:21 AM (YdcZ0)
The Democrats are the ones who sowed the seeds for this kind of Congressional trash with their years of "Its just sex" BS, followed up with a healthy side of "People's personal lives are off limits if it doesn't affect their job...," with a dessert of "Lets elect male prostitutes and page-diddlers to more terms while exalting them."
Despite the blundering of the GOP, they're a damn sight better than anything a Democrat could offer the nation. Which isn't saying much, but there it is.
I'm voting R in NJ this November, in what will be a delicious ousting of a completely corrupt Democrat Senator.
Can't wait.
Posted by: Good Lt at October 03, 2006 09:36 AM (yT+NK)
http://www.thelawparty.org/FranklinCoverup/WashingtonTimes.htm
And don't forget Jeff Gannon.
At least Clinton wasn't a fag.
Posted by: Greg at October 03, 2006 09:58 AM (/+dAV)
Homophobic now? Got yer little worldview all twisted into knots, huh?
Posted by: Good Lt at October 03, 2006 10:05 AM (yT+NK)
The truth is coming out one drip at a time, Greg. Read em and weep.
Posted by: Good Lt at October 03, 2006 10:08 AM (yT+NK)
Posted by: Good Lt at October 03, 2006 10:09 AM (yT+NK)
Posted by: Greg at October 03, 2006 10:13 AM (/+dAV)
Takin the level of debate down to that 1st grade level, huh?
You're on your own. I'll leave the readers to judge what you are. (chorttle).
Posted by: Good Lt at October 03, 2006 10:29 AM (yT+NK)
Posted by: Greg at October 03, 2006 10:36 AM (/+dAV)
GOP,Send him up to Seattle, he could probably beat MeDermott running on the bad gay platform.
Where the hell is the ACLU? I thought they would have this guy up for Scout Master or Little League coach by now.
Oh, the lib outrage.....
FUUUUUUWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!
Posted by: Brad at October 03, 2006 10:54 AM (Ignlt)
that was called Habeas Corpus from the Magna Carter. It was a law from 1215 BC until a few days ago
please resume... Clintons liberal Demolican terrorist cut and beheading blah blah blah - you just lost your republic go ahead and change the chanel. Oh, and never mind all those prisons.
Posted by: tbone at October 03, 2006 12:06 PM (cviJ2)
Posted by: Greg at October 03, 2006 12:29 PM (/+dAV)
Posted by: Good Lt at October 03, 2006 01:20 PM (lvyez)
Posted by: tbone at October 03, 2006 01:57 PM (cviJ2)
I suppose "the nation's honor" is worth a few more thousand lives here?
KSM was waterboarded and Brian Ross (ABC News reporter reporting on the Foley scandal, son) reported that it had obtained actionable intel from KSM that prevented an attack. Take it up with him.
Nice try, drama queen.
Posted by: Good Lt at October 03, 2006 02:38 PM (lvyez)
honor (merriam webster) 'ä-n&r :
good name or public esteem : REPUTATION b : a showing of usually merited respect : RECOGNITION
Posted by: tbone at October 03, 2006 02:59 PM (cviJ2)
Posted by: tbone at October 03, 2006 03:02 PM (cviJ2)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 03, 2006 03:36 PM (xJ3Xm)
Posted by: Howie at October 03, 2006 03:53 PM (YdcZ0)
Posted by: tbone at October 03, 2006 04:09 PM (cviJ2)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 03, 2006 04:56 PM (xJ3Xm)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 03, 2006 05:14 PM (xJ3Xm)
Posted by: tbone at October 03, 2006 05:18 PM (XDUhP)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 03, 2006 09:34 PM (xJ3Xm)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at October 03, 2006 10:50 PM (Dd86v)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 04, 2006 02:37 PM (paKD6)
Posted by: saeed at October 10, 2006 07:21 AM (F1nba)
Posted by: saeed at October 10, 2006 07:25 AM (F1nba)
October 02, 2006
Republicans seem less inclined toward leniency with Republican Mark Foley, who resigned Friday after allegations of improper email and instant messge contact with teenage Congressional pages.
Republican Jen also remembers Mel Reynolds.
Via Drudge Report.
Posted by: Bluto at
03:23 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: bounty hunter at October 02, 2006 04:06 PM (56rPU)
Posted by: RepJ at October 02, 2006 05:32 PM (XlkAj)
Gov. Edwards was part right when he said ...
Don't get caught in bed with a dead woman (well Teddy got away with it) or a live boy!
Posted by: jack at October 03, 2006 04:37 AM (VNmqc)
September 27, 2006
DALLAS - 7-Eleven Inc. is dropping Venezuela-backed Citgo as its gasoline supplier after more than 20 years as part of a previously announced plan by the convenience store operator to launch its own brand of fuel.Citgo is a wholly owned subsidiary of the government of Venezuela, led by the obese buffoon Hugo Chavez, whose antics at the UN recently included calling President Bush "the devil".
Citgo Petroleum Corp. is a Houston-based subsidiary of Venezuela’s state-run oil company and 7-Eleven is worried that anti-American comments made by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez might prompt motorists to fill-up elsewhere.Probably a valid concern.
Unfortunately, the effects of a boycott will probably be felt most by independently owned gas stations selling the Citgo brand. Nonetheless, not buying gas with the Citgo brand on it is seen as an important symbolic gesture by many Americans.
More on Citgo boycott here.
Posted by: Bluto at
03:32 PM
| Comments (32)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Greg at September 27, 2006 03:49 PM (/+dAV)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 27, 2006 04:06 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: Greg at September 27, 2006 04:07 PM (/+dAV)
Posted by: Greg at September 27, 2006 04:11 PM (/+dAV)
Posted by: Greg at September 27, 2006 04:13 PM (/+dAV)
Posted by: Greg at September 27, 2006 04:15 PM (/+dAV)
"Mother's little helper" is not a job title, Greg, even if you are good at getting to all those hard to get at spots at bathtime.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 27, 2006 04:24 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: Greg at September 27, 2006 04:28 PM (/+dAV)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 27, 2006 04:42 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at September 27, 2006 05:15 PM (Dd86v)
Posted by: davec at September 27, 2006 05:19 PM (QkWqQ)
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/15608263.htm
Posted by: Mrs Abe Froman at September 27, 2006 05:42 PM (J7rSt)
Posted by: grinnel at September 27, 2006 06:17 PM (Xhg7X)
Greg is obsessed with dick:
"You piss through a quill, you eunuch."
"Quickly delete my posts before anyone finds out that
you are a dickless wonder."
"I help Yo Mama 'cause your daddy can't and neither
can you now that you have no dick."
Three consecutive posts all about dicks. Geezus.
Posted by: Darth Vag at September 27, 2006 06:53 PM (HSkSw)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 27, 2006 06:58 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: grinnel at September 27, 2006 07:07 PM (Xhg7X)
Posted by: Howie at September 27, 2006 08:06 PM (YdcZ0)
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 27, 2006 08:36 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 27, 2006 08:56 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: grinnel at September 27, 2006 09:22 PM (Xhg7X)
Former Sgt. Lauro Chavez has been fired from his job"
No shit Greg - do you have any idea why?
Gregory K. McGrath and Tom Thistleton sure do!
Posted by: Max Power at September 27, 2006 09:27 PM (aMi4b)
Yes, it is. lol! Just goes to show that Libs will spread their legs for anybody-- dictators, terrorists, and now even big oil-- as long as they are enemies of our country. See the pattern?
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 27, 2006 11:07 PM (ILns2)
Posted by: grinnel at September 28, 2006 12:01 AM (Xhg7X)
Greg - your toad Lauro Chavez is in for a world of hurt.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=64837
This piece of shit is nothing more than a Jesse MacBeth clone.
Where do you find these clowns???
Posted by: Max Power at September 28, 2006 01:03 AM (aMi4b)
what color is the sky in your world. Because in mine Syria isn't an oil exporter. In fact, the Arab governments we buy oil from are anti-Syria and anti-terrorism. See the pattern?
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 28, 2006 07:33 AM (EcCrf)
Question? I'm confused. If the left is "Pro-Labor" why do they constantly attack oil companies. Who on average pay their labor very well. I don't get it.
Posted by: Howie at September 28, 2006 08:30 AM (YdcZ0)
Posted by: jonny at September 28, 2006 08:51 AM (QbGjZ)
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 28, 2006 09:31 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: sandpiper at September 28, 2006 03:07 PM (h6CK1)
Posted by: greyrooster at September 28, 2006 06:14 PM (11BMB)
if they lower the price 10 cents, the next guy will lower it 15 cents and he'll get the line 5 blocks long.
Posted by: dcb at September 28, 2006 09:23 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: greyrooster at September 29, 2006 06:38 AM (nULxl)
September 24, 2006
NEW YORK (AP) - Venezuela's foreign minister said he was illegally detained for 90 minutes by officials at a New York airport and accused them of treating him abusively by trying to frisk and handcuff him.Random harassment in retaliation for Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez's childish antics at the UN?U.S. officials called Saturday's incident regrettable and said they had apologized to Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro. Maduro called that insufficient and said Venezuela would seek a legal challenge through the U.N. to what he called a "flagrant violation of international law" and his diplomatic immunity.
"We were detained for an hour and a half, threatened by police with being beaten," Maduro told reporters at Venezuela's mission to the U.N. "We hold the U.S. government responsible."
Not quite:
A U.N. diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said Maduro's trip was delayed because he had showed up late without a ticket, prompting extra screening.If Maduro hadn't been too stupid and self-important to follow standard procedures he would have been escorted through security by the Secret Service.Department of Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke denied that Maduro was mistreated at John F. Kennedy International Airport when he was selected for an added security check.
"He began to articulate his frustration with secondary screening right after he went through," a metal detector, Knocke said. "Port Authority officials confronted him when the situation became a ruckus."
Having trained TSA screeners and worked with LEOs (Law Enforcement Officers) interfacing with the TSA, I'll say unequivocally, that Maduro's accusations brand him as a liar, and not a very bright one at that.
The only "regrettable" part about this incident is that some milquetoast US official apologized to this horse's ass.
Posted by: Bluto at
03:33 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 315 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: SeeMonk at September 24, 2006 04:07 PM (n4VvM)
Posted by: kilimanjaro at September 24, 2006 06:25 PM (EFmWF)
Posted by: Venezuelanexile at September 24, 2006 07:15 PM (a/kZr)
Posted by: Keith at September 24, 2006 09:00 PM (ey9Ol)
Do you think that anyone who claims to be a diplomat can just waltz through airport security?
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 24, 2006 09:42 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: greyrooster at September 24, 2006 09:44 PM (zFudt)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at September 24, 2006 10:09 PM (Dd86v)
Posted by: greyrooster at September 25, 2006 05:40 AM (rLAgq)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at September 25, 2006 11:43 AM (Dd86v)
Posted by: sandpiper at September 26, 2006 10:46 PM (ba9dN)
September 22, 2006
And now for something completely different. Since you're in the mood to watch videos, be sure to check out my latest.
Posted by: Bluto at
11:44 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1. He did indeed try to kill Bin Laden multiple times.
Now, do I like how he tried? No. Lobbing missiles is a joke. Clinton was terrified of another Somalia and that fear tainted all of his subsequent military decision making. I personally feel it was the biggest (by a long shot) mistake of his presidency. He, btw, agrees with that assessment in his book.
2. The right attacked him for it claiming he was trying to distract people from his legal problems.
Was he actually trying to distract people? I dunno, that was probably part of it. However, the fact remains that at the time the right attacked him for it and called it a waste of time and a simple distraction.
3. Bush, by his own words, had little to no interest in the rest of the world until 9/11.
Bush, throughout his 2000 campaign was pushing what equated to an isolationist stance. He had no real interest in pursuing really anything outside of the US. The initial months of his presidency bear this out. Now, that all changed 9/11 and yes, I think it changed dramatically for the better.
Posted by: Rich at September 23, 2006 12:14 AM (89Rw1)
We're in a war, not a crime wave.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 23, 2006 12:58 AM (vBK4C)
None of that buys potatoes. We all need to concentrate on winning this war and I don't just mean in Iraq & Afghanistan. We're in a clash of barbarians vs. civilization, the sooner we get down to serious business and stop pussyfooting around the better.
Cliffnotes version; Nuke 'em all and let God sort them out!
Just my humble opinion.
Posted by: Subvet at September 23, 2006 02:54 AM (DNVxw)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2006 09:17 AM (v3I+x)
Of course none of you want to sacrifice what it would take to win the "war on terror". That would mean giving up most of your pampered lifestyle. It would mean having to admit that everything you want to have and enjoy is based on the very resource that Bush and his cabal are protecting and has nothing to do with "freedom".
It would mean having to ration and conserve and cut back and stop wasting and think about others. When hell freezes over. No way are you going to do what it takes to win this "war on terror".
WHY? Because it's easier to blame others for your spoiled rotten, wasteful, egregious, greedy, self absorbed lifestyle. It's easier to say it's all their fault while sitting back and eating grapes.
All this talk about freedom while you've chained yourselves to one energy engine. Fools, all of you are fools. Go about your business, for not one of you will comprehend the gravitas. Select few are resigned to the consequences of the impact about to be wreaked upon the ship of fools. Many others are victims of blind masses of evangelical energy barons with her fat and malnourished children fully expectant of a pimped ride. Take a deep breath, your roller coaster ride has already begun. Evolution's steamroller will crush us all.
Posted by: civilbehavior at September 23, 2006 09:52 AM (XMVlQ)
Clinton made his mistakes, but the leftist academia deserves the blame for creating a frame of reference that saw Islam through post-colonial blinders instead of as a theocratic imperialistic system.
civilbehavior - so, I'd take it that you'd support telling Ralph Nader to STFU when it comes to nuclear power? The enviro wack-jobs are already putting the kibosh on pebble bed reactors. It is the BS of the "China Syndrome" all over again.
Posted by: Abdullah al-Libi at September 23, 2006 10:37 AM (Q4Ywu)
Oh, just STFU.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at September 23, 2006 11:31 AM (bH9q3)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2006 11:58 AM (v3I+x)
BTW, what's worse? Digging under ground to find oil or cutting down trees and destroying prairies so that we can grow soybeans and such for their fatty oils to put into our cars? Do vegetable oil refinery plants not give off pollutants? I'm sure there is some kind of acid and then deacidifying and bleaching process in there where the residue is being leaked into some river in Nigeria.
I swear, some people are so closed minded.
Posted by: RepJ at September 23, 2006 01:59 PM (L5LRS)
Posted by: greyrooster at September 23, 2006 11:08 PM (uACpf)
In a way, all of Washington is to blame. Only a few people saw the problem and wanted to do something, and they were all blocked and frustrated in both Clinton's and Bush's administrations, for a variety of political reasons. And, except for a short period after 9/11, Washington doesn't seem to have learned a thing. We are really governed by media, bureaucrats, consultants and lawyers, and we have no control over any of them.
Posted by: AST at September 24, 2006 02:26 AM (FN9Es)
September 10, 2006
Just in case anyone has forgotten who our enemies are:
Since this celebration of mass murder, the Palestinians have elected a terrorist organization, Hamas, as their government. This is a diseased culture. Perhaps the best solution would be to imprison the adults, and have the children raised by civilized human beings.
Posted by: Bluto at
04:50 PM
| Comments (32)
| Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
So did Israel...
The Dancing Israelis:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"
Posted by: Greg at September 10, 2006 06:44 PM (PnoGS)
Posted by: greyrooster at September 10, 2006 07:20 PM (zCLF8)
Posted by: sandpiper at September 10, 2006 07:26 PM (r8sk+)
Posted by: Jeremy H. Bol at September 10, 2006 08:46 PM (zFYjM)
Posted by: SeeMonk at September 10, 2006 09:08 PM (n4VvM)
Posted by: Mrs Abe Froman at September 10, 2006 09:18 PM (CrbvM)
Greg,
bullshit. Was asked by whom? Name and date please. Funny how the only references to his alleged statement come from wacko websites using the EXACT SAME verbiage, i.e., "was asked", but never a mention about WHO asked, or when/where. I smell a rat. I want to know WHO asked, and when/where.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 12:24 AM (8e/V4)
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/conspiracy_theory/fullstory.asp?id=287
Even Al Jazeera is calling this lunacy for what it is: a conspiracy theory.
Honestly, it's actually an interesting article but, only from the point of view of being informed of *conspiracy theories* and not of actual events. They even seem to cite the original news source of the reports.
Posted by: Rich at September 11, 2006 01:12 AM (89Rw1)
Posted by: JeepThang at September 11, 2006 01:44 AM (yZQoS)
Rich,
Not quite. Even Al-Jazeera uses the "was asked" verbiage without saying WHO asked, nor when/where it was asked. Exact same verbiage over and over and over again. "Was asked." Whatever. It doesn't pass my bullshit detector.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 01:46 AM (8e/V4)
I wasn't citing that as proof the story is real. I was citing it as proof it's bullshit.
The article is in their "conspiracy theory" section. They're simply rehashing the 9/11 conspiracy theories, that one included. I found it interesting on that point alone just because I enjoy reading about the crazy shit people believe.
Again, it is bullshit and even Al Jazeera says so (which is really saying something if they're not jumping at the chance to report lunacy as real news) by filing it in "conspiracy theory".
So put simply Jesusland Carlos, I agree with you.
Posted by: Rich at September 11, 2006 02:01 AM (89Rw1)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 02:05 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 11, 2006 06:15 AM (v3I+x)
As a little girl I remember alot of "Haflas", at Rafah, we were to every wedding, engagement, religious feast, and they came to us at Shavuot holiday, and Sucot, and every barbeque we were having. Their relationship with my father and his brother was so good, that at Yom Cipur war they saved our lives. My father and his brother just used years of savings to buy plants for their new orchards, they also have taken loans. Just when they had started the planting Yom Kipur war burst and they where called (like all the men in the Mashav, or everywhere) to fight. My father and his brother used to tell this story with teers in their eyes. They thought they were ruined. While they were fighting at the front line, they were sure they won't have anything but debts to go back to, and years of work were lost, as their plants were not taken care of, and they would be ruined by the time they got back. I wasn't born yet, my elder sister was about six years old. There was no one to work there. My father's Palestinian friend from Rafah couldn't see all this work going down the drain, so he gathered all his sons and nephews, and worked our field while our men where at war. There were no cell phones at the time, my father and his brother came back happy to be alive, but sure there were facing distruction. There gratitude to their friend from Rafah is beyond explanation.
During the Oslo accords, between 93 and 2000, our friend's situation got worse by the day. The Tunis group of Arrafat collected "protection fee" from everyone, and they suffocated our friend's business. My father had his chance to pay back with favors, but they went from proud hard working generous contractors (our friend, his brother and theis sons), to neerly starving. They resented PLO for its corruption so much that the whole family joined Hamas. These people were no Jew haters. I can't say their names because every knowledge about connection between us and them after 2000 might give an excuse to anybody in the Gaza strip who might have had some dispute with them, to announce them as collaborators with Isarel, and they would be lynched in a second.
I know of Radical Islam's diseases, but befor Arafat came to the territories few Palestinians were taken by that. There was no Martyrdom colture in the territories. Arafat founded the Palestinian TV and incited them in a horrible way. As a child I could go to Gaza all the time, but now I would be lynched in a heartbeat. Arafat denyed them of both their own making of living and their aid that was sent to them from the whole world. You can't begin to imagine. A Palestinian could not move an inch without paying somebody from Tunis. Arafat's cops were corrupted, his services were corrupted, all of the successful businesses of before 95 collapsed with their new unwanted "partners" from the Palestinian authority. The Palestinians were never as poor as when Arafst was in charge. (The statistics are not a messurment here, because at the same time the Palestinians went bankrupt, Araft's people became millionaires. The statics show all of them together). At the same time they were denied their money from the world, they were also denied from their cance for a future. They were tought at scool not to hope for peace with the Jews, not the be impressed by all these celebrations of signing peace agreements in the whitehouse. Arafat made it clear there will be no future, no state, untill they wipe Israel. He made it clear a Palestinian child can hope to nothing other then Martyrdom, he was not going to use one cent for the building of new Universities, labs, something to growof. No. He said over and over again: "If you're tired, then sit at hime, and send me your kids".
Well, our friend had rathered send Hamas their kids, at least Hamas wasn't robbing them. But Hamas made murderes out of them. The same boy who worked with his father to save my father's plantation, planned suicide bombings in Israel. He was responsible for the death of Israelis before he was killed by IDF. I know that because my father's friend told him of that in his anguish, after having loosing his son. His brother is one of Hamas' chiefs these days.
Why am I writing all of this? because I don't think you realise the extent of the change the Palestinians have been through under Arafat. Palestinians have slaughtered Jews back in 1922 and there on, but it was conducted by religious radical leaders. The population was never like it is after Arafat's time. It really wasn't this bad. Children were not raised to kill. They were tought Jews are evil but they were not tought to be martyrs. They were not martyrs. I really have no illusions, I'm not trying to make it seem as if things were ok. There was always colture of theaching children to hate Jews, but since most Palestininas were working in Israel, when the children came home, some of the parents would tell them it's nonsense, and that they should concentrate on their studies, and not on the legends their teachers were telling. That's all.
by the way, just so I won't feel like a hypocritic, I was one of the strongest advocators of Oslo. We all were. I haven't got the energy to get in to explaining our state of mind at the time.
Posted by: from Israel at September 11, 2006 06:41 AM (Ty4gR)
Posted by: greyrooster at September 11, 2006 09:54 AM (s56r8)
The following appeared in the New York Times on
September 12, 2001, p. A22:
'Asked tonight what the attack [on New York and Washington] meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, replied: "It's very good." Then he edited himself: "Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy."'
You can view the article for a fee at:
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00D15F8395C0C718DDDA00894D9404482
Posted by: Greg at September 11, 2006 12:25 PM (PnoGS)
context helps, thank you. So Netanyahu's comment about 9/11 being "very good" was in response to a question about what the attack meant for relations between Israel and the U.S.-- not that the attacks were very good. He was stating the obvious.
I was listening to Alex Jones yesterday on KLBJ and thinking how his entire ideology is dependent on out-of-context quotes and distortions. Thanks for confirming that.
You know, I started out as a conspiracy theorist. Once upon a time I was a veritable "expert" on the Federal Reserve, for example. But that worldview just doesn't hold up under closer scrutiny. This is a pretty good example.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 01:00 PM (8e/V4)
You basically called me a liar before I verified the quote for you.
Dance around all you want.
I can backup everything I say.
Posted by: Greg at September 11, 2006 01:06 PM (PnoGS)
I didn't call you a liar. I called the quote bogus. It is. That much is clear when you see it in context.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 01:08 PM (8e/V4)
No, no, no!
The context was provided to you in my first post.
You questioned the veracity of the quote.
You've got to learn how to be a better liar if you want to practice law.
Posted by: Greg at September 11, 2006 02:26 PM (PnoGS)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 04:59 PM (paKD6)
20/20 covered it, but all original source has been spiked.
There were actually 200 Mossad arrested, juxtoposed with 9-11.
It was covered and then spiked by Fox News, but here is the archived series (4 parts).
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7545.htm
Posted by: Greg at September 11, 2006 06:28 PM (PnoGS)
Conspiracy websites claim that 20/20 and Fox covered it, yet none link it. Is Google part of the conspiracy, too? Did they wipe their cache?
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 11, 2006 06:41 PM (vBK4C)
Again, It's Fox News video!
Apparently, you didn't bother to look at it the link I gave you.
Is Fox News a terrorist organization?
Posted by: Greg at September 11, 2006 07:01 PM (PnoGS)
Posted by: Greg at September 11, 2006 07:53 PM (PnoGS)
so what part of that clip talks about "dancing Israelis"? None. It merely talks about Israeli spying activities in the U.S. ...against ARABS.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 08:08 PM (paKD6)
Posted by: Greg at September 11, 2006 08:25 PM (PnoGS)
So essentially we come full circle back to another unfounded conspiracy theory. I've found that's what always happens when I follow these conspiracy bread crumbs.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 08:33 PM (paKD6)
Unlike the palestinians who celebrated in the streets, Israel actually tried to warn the U.S. about the attack, but we ignored them:
"In August of 2001, the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad gives the CIA the names of 200 people they consider to be terrorist threats. The Mossad were apparently interested in Atta and his accomplice, Marwan al-Shehi."
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/conspiracytheories/intelligence.html
That's a far cry from your unfounded allegations about "dancing Israelis."
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 08:42 PM (paKD6)
Israel gave the US several specific warnings of the 9/11 attacks. In the second week of August 2001, two high-ranking agents from the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, came to Washington and warned the CIA and FBI that 50 to 200 al-Qaeda terrorists had slipped into the US and were planning an imminent “major assault on the US†aimed at a “large scale target†[Telegraph, 9/16/01, Los Angeles Times, 9/20/01, Ottawa Citizen, 9/17/01 Fox News, 5/17/02]. Near the end of August, France also gave a warning that was an “echo†of Israel’s. [Fox News, 5/17/02]
and
In October 2002, the story broke in Europe and Israel that on August 23, 2001, the Mossad had given the CIA a list of 19 terrorists living in the US. The Mossad had said that the terrorists appeared to be planning to carry out an attack in the near future. It is unknown if these are the same 19 names as the actual hijackers, or if the number is a coincidence. However, the four names on the list that are known are names of the 9/11 hijackers: Nawaf Alhazmi, Khalid Almihdhar, Marwan Alshehhi, and Mohamed Atta. [Die Zeit, 10/1/02, Der Spiegel, 10/1/02, BBC, 10/2/02, Ha’aretz, 10/3/02] These are also probably the four most important of the hijackers (and two of the pilots). From them, there were many connections to the others. The CIA had already been monitoring three of them overseas the year before, and two, Alhazmi and Almihdhar, were put on a watch list the same day the Mossad gave this warning. [AFP, 9/22/01, Berliner Zeitung, 9/24/01, Observer, 9/30/01, New York Times, 9/21/02]
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/essay.jsp?article=essaytheytriedtowarnus
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 08:48 PM (paKD6)
Keep looking at the barn while the house is on fire. Is it Bush you hate so much, or yourself? What is your problem?
Posted by: Leatherneck at September 11, 2006 10:11 PM (D2g/j)
Go figure...
http://www.gothamgazette.com/citizen/jan02/7.shtml
Posted by: Greg at September 12, 2006 07:29 AM (PnoGS)
September 09, 2006
In a letter timed to avoid the weekly news cycle, lawyers for former President Bill Clinton have demanded that ABC pull their controversial miniseries, "The Path to 9/11":
"The Path to 9/11" not only tarnishes the work of the 9/11 Commission, but also cheapens the fith anniversary of what was a very painful moment in history for all Americans. We expect that you will make the responsible decision to not air this film.Full text of the letter here.Sincerely,
Bruce R. Lindsey
Chief Executive Officer
William J. Clinton FoundationDouglas J. Band
Counselor to President Clinton
Office of William Jefferson Clinton
Posted by: Bluto at
11:20 AM
| Comments (35)
| Add Comment
Post contains 115 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Richard H. at September 09, 2006 12:47 PM (/xUS1)
Posted by: John at September 09, 2006 01:10 PM (kTdum)
Posted by: mrclark at September 09, 2006 01:33 PM (ssZ1U)
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 09, 2006 01:37 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 09, 2006 02:05 PM (8e/V4)
No mention of Burger's thefts, No mention of the CIA's repeated attempts to get permission to take out OBL denied by the Clinton administration and not a word of the "distractions" *coughMonicacough* that caused a loss of focus on capturing or killing those responsible for Khobar Towers, the embassies and the USS Cole.
The founding fathers must be rolling in their graves. If it was up to me, I'd personally shoot everyone of these media bastards in their posh NY offices.
I now can only consider the media an organ of the DNC.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at September 09, 2006 02:20 PM (3nKvy)
Posted by: Robert Crawford at September 09, 2006 02:36 PM (bH9q3)
Posted by: Pigilito at September 09, 2006 03:24 PM (+nMhW)
Okay sorry to mess up your fantasy. Go back to your O'Reilly and Limbaugh "truth".
Posted by: Peter at September 09, 2006 03:54 PM (9D6Xr)
Posted by Richard H. at September 9, 2006 12:47 PM
My friend, you have some issues and I'm afraid they've got nothing to do with the Clintons. Best of luck with all that. Remember, you have to live with yourself so try and show yourself some kindness. Why believe the straw men arguments and shadows created by the right wing blogs and talk show hosts. They don't give a fuck about you or America. They just want to create controversy and get ratings. They're turning a lot of you guys into monsters. I daresay that American or not, you'd hurt a liberal or a Democrat as quickly as you would an Al Quaeda member. Does that make sense? Do you think liberals caused 911? Do you really fu*king think liberals or Dems don't want to win the war on terror as much as you and see Bin Laden and al qaeda destroyed? . If you're going to blame 911 on Clinton, then you might as well go all the way back to Reagan who funded the Mujahadeen and OBL and talked them up as freedom fighters against the Soviets.
No. Let's put the blame where it truthfully belongs. And that is a President who ignored intelligence reports about OBL wanting to attack the U.S. and went away on vacation instead and on 911 sat for 7 minutes unable to do anything except bite his lip and then started flying all around the country like a chicken with it's head cut off for most of the day. Let's put the blame on a President who decided to deplete U.S. forces in Afghanistan and curtail the hunt for OBL to begin a bogus war in Iraq (Which had nothing to do with 911 or with OBL, see yesterdays report)to find WMD's. It made sense to a lot of us, but week after week and month after month: Nothing. And more dead soldiers and more dead Iraqi's and more money down the drain and more glaring incompetence. A country in Chaos. A region dangerously destabilized. This country losing the moral high ground and falling to using torture and inhuman jails (Not that I care. Only reason I care is because it put's American soldiers suseptible to the same degrading treatment). Civil right eroded. Executive power abused. Declared unconstitutional even (SCOTUS: Hamdan case). Our standing it the world messed up. On and on it goes. Yet, it's the fu*king Clinton's.
WTF.
Give me a break. Please.
Posted by: peter at September 09, 2006 04:28 PM (9D6Xr)
Posted by: Howie at September 09, 2006 04:31 PM (YdcZ0)
Clinton and the Democratic Party, with his knowledge, have threatened to take away ABC's Freedom of Speech.
If you are an American, which I think you are not, you would understand this.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH, IT IS WHY PEOPLE LIKE YOU CAN TALK, WE HAVE THE GUNS AND KNOW HOW TO USE THEM, YET WE LET YOU TALK, WHY?
The Democratic Party has just threatened to violate the Constitution of the United States of America, WAKE UP AND STOP PROTECTING AN ADMITTED LIAR.
Posted by: Naieve at September 09, 2006 04:47 PM (+PWjE)
I'm as American as you are, bub. And dude, you don't "allow me" to do dipsquat. You have nothing to do with it. My freedom of speech (and yours) is protected by the CONSITUTION. And if you (and your army of Hannity/O'Reilly/Limbaugh zombies) did come after me with a gun, you better bring a big one because you're going to have a serious war on your hands.
Clinton and the Democratic Party, with his knowledge, have threatened to take away ABC's Freedom of Speech.
They've done no such thing. They've pointed out that the film is historically inaccurate. ABC can do whatever it wanta. They can present a lie if that want to make the film seem more sensationalist or have a phony balance to to make up for the glaring failure of the Bush administration.
Posted by: peter at September 09, 2006 05:15 PM (9D6Xr)
Posted by: Howie at September 09, 2006 05:15 PM (YdcZ0)
Posted by: Darth Odie at September 09, 2006 05:19 PM (YdcZ0)
Of course they can - the State is not going to arrest and throw the creators of the film in jail - but the letter from Clinton's lawyer says that they expect that they will make the "responsible decision to not air this film."
Where I come from this constitutes a threat.
So if they make the "irresponsible" decision to air the film, what? Harrassement? Law suit? Knee caps? Clinton's lawyers are too smart to outline the exact consequences but an underlying threat is there.
What kind of man is Clinton to authorize such a thing? I knew he was a liar. I didn't know he was a cowardly bully. I know, I should have known...
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at September 09, 2006 06:23 PM (3k2QM)
Conservatives are not suing to suspend legal surveillance programs that have thwarted terrorist plots, liberals are.
A Republican did not compare our troops at Guantanamo to Gulag guards, Nazis, and KGB, that was Democrat Dick Durbin.
A Republican did not cast aside presumption of innocence and accuse combat troops of "cold-blooded murder", that was Democrat Jack Murtha.
Conservatives have not demanded Geneva Convention rights and access to classified intelligence for murdering terrorist scumbags, that is the province of liberals.
It was not conservatives on the staff of the New York Times who have insisted on exposing covert government counter-terrorism programs, it was treasonous liberals.
All in all, if you're on the liberal side of these arguments, you may be an American de jure, but de facto, you're a collaborator.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 09, 2006 06:37 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 09, 2006 06:59 PM (v3I+x)
Some questions. Please provide factual evidence in response.
But first an answer to your question, Do you think liberals caused 911?
Yes, you certainly did by creating an environment where our enemies knew there would not be any response to any of their terror attacks.
1. What torture? What form of torture? Who, when, where? Remember, you do not get to invent new methods and claim they were used. Or change widely held definitions to fit into a new, liberal definition of torture.
2. What civil rights did you have on September 10, 2001 that you do not have today? What article of the Bill of Rights has been revoked?
3. What inhuman jails? Where are they? What makes them, if they exist, inhuman.
Good luck with all that, Pete.
I knew he was a liar. I didn't know he was a cowardly bully. There it is, Heroic Dreamer. Clinton is a liar, he is a coward, he is a bully, he is a rapist, he is a Democrat.
Posted by: cranky at September 09, 2006 07:23 PM (Xj2Ev)
Right Howie, because ABC/Disney doesn't have any high powered lawyers. If ABC truly believes it's the truth, I'll be the first to defend them if they want to show it, but they should be prepared to accept the consequences if it's proven to be false or seriously embellished or flawed. And by consequences I mean ABC losing credibility.
My view is that they felt they had to balance things out somehow because Bush looked so absurd that day.
Dead Pundit: one look at that list of yours, says so much about you. Wow. I’m just so sorry for what’s happened to your brain. What did you learn in school?? You don’t get it AT ALL. It’s not what or how a country acts in times of peace that show the principles and character of it’s people. It’s how a country carries itself through times of crisis. All those things you mention (Torture, Excessive Unconstitutional Executive power, illegal wiretaps w/o FISA overview, Presidential Arrogance incompetence, lies, spin, manipulation, corruption and destructive partisanship) they aren’t what this country is about. Yeah there should be a strong defense and response to AQ and Osama. But if it threatens the very foundation of the principles that the country was founded on , the terrorists HAVE won already. Bush let them. He raised up a two bit psychopath to the level of a legend (OBL). And you can blame the liberals all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that you have just glaringly shown to the world that YOU have no idea what it means to be an American. You need to buckle down and pick up some history books, read the constitution and read up on America. It's a great place.
Improbalus: Are you like 12 or what? “Lefturd�
Cooties right back at ya.
Dork.
Posted by: Peter Eater at September 09, 2006 07:54 PM (9D6Xr)
And since I'm in no mood for leftism this weekend, I think I'll go back and edit all of your comments to read something like "God bless George W. Bush."
Then I can sit back and laugh and laugh as you whine about me violating your freedom of speech. Even though I'm not Congress.
Dork.
Posted by: Vinnie at September 09, 2006 08:02 PM (/qy9A)
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at September 09, 2006 08:56 PM (3k2QM)
You might want to educate yourself as to how the country got through a couple of other rough patches, say, the Civil War, the First and Second World Wars...extra credit: look up the Sedition Act, Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus for Confederate spies, minor things like that.
You remind me of the medieval thane who was successfully defending his village from viking attack by blocking a narrow causeway. The vikings shouted that his tactics were dishonorable and cowardly. The thane allowed them across the causeway to protect his honor. He and his men were killed; the villagers were murdered, raped, and enslaved.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 09, 2006 09:05 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: Richard H. at September 09, 2006 10:57 PM (/xUS1)
Posted by: sandpiper at September 10, 2006 02:22 PM (n7v4a)
You people simply refuse to accept that Bush is a complete and utter failure as a president who has every step of the way weakened this country and inadvertedly strengthened Al Qaeda. By "created an environment" I suppose you mean the greatest economic expansion in the history of the U.S.
and the huge budget surplus left by Clinton? Maybe you mean the fact that the U.S. was a country committed to human rights? Or perhaps that North Korea was under control, Iraq was contained. Iran was not a middle east power broker controlling the Iraq militia's and well on the way to becoming a democracy. Or maybe you mean the historic peace agreement that was a hairsbreadth away from being signed between the PLO and Israel? I’m sure all those things made Islamofascists think we were weak.
But let’s assume for a second that you’re right, shouldn’t Bush have made OBL and AQ a national priority as soon as he got into office instead of taking long vacations, ignoring counter-terrorism reports and fattening up his cronies in the oil industry?
As for the rest of your questions, Cranky, I’m not going to play this game. I don’t want to waste my time writing a post that is going to be deleted or messed with.
Google is your friend. Use it. Don’t believe everything you hear from the Bush administration. It should be obvious even to you at this point that they’re liars. Hell, don’t believe everything you hear from anyone left or right. Think for yourself.
Here’s some words you can type into Google. Have fun.
Abu Ghraib
Dog leashes
Beatings
Humiliation
Water boarding.
Cruel and unusual punishment
Geneva Convention
Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld
Guantanamo
CIA rendition
Secret camps.
McCain against Bush torture policy
Illegal wiretaps without FISA oversight.
NSC data mining.
Being held without charges
No access to a lawyer
No contact with the outside world
Having to defend yourself against secret charges.
Lies
Corruption
Cronyism
Katrina
Budget deficit
Worst President since Herbert Hoover
Most jobs lost since the depression
Phony coalition
Gas prices at all time high
Oil Co. profits at all time high
Halliburton scandal
500 Billion dollar war
2700 dead U.S. Soldiers
100,000 dead Iraqi’s
Osama Bin Laden free
Al Qaeda and Taliban allowed province in Warziristan
Posted by: peter at September 10, 2006 05:31 PM (9D6Xr)
Sure, there are times when the Exec branch has to step in and make some minor adjustments to the Constitution in order to preserve the republic, but the problem with your argument is that George Bush is no John Adams, he's definitely no Lincoln and he's absolutely not an FDR. Actually it's an insult to those great men that he was ever elected president.
Posted by: Peter at September 10, 2006 05:41 PM (9D6Xr)
Next case.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 10, 2006 06:42 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: Peter at September 11, 2006 12:37 AM (9D6Xr)
Posted by: Peter at September 11, 2006 12:57 AM (9D6Xr)
Peter,
as I often tell one of my wacko conspiracy theory friends-- it's not your facts that are in dispute, it's your conclusions.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at September 11, 2006 12:58 AM (8e/V4)
PS: You're lucky I'm not literally in your face. I don't suffer fools gladly.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 11, 2006 09:34 AM (vBK4C)
Posted by: Peter at September 11, 2006 11:33 AM (9D6Xr)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 11, 2006 11:39 AM (vBK4C)
I am with Peter on this. Thanks for expressing my exact sentiments on the whole damn messed up affair beginning when Bush and his cronies " stole " the election! Real paradox there. Let's go to Supreme Court to supress votes and thwart the will of a Democratic society. It's all gone very downhill from that point on and the lame excuse fore a leader has shit on the American people time and again by going on multiple 5-week war-time vacations while jobs were leaving our shores and tax-cuts were getting his buddies rich. Trying to fuck with our social security and doing nothing about poverty and health care. Not to mention Katrina. So Bravo! Peter! Let the others eat shit! Fore! L o ~~~~~~~~~ O
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at September 11, 2006 11:10 PM (Dd86v)
August 13, 2006
As well as adorning altars, lounges and bedrooms purely for their outrageous novelty and sensual beauty, these Wondrous Puppets are used all over the world by educators, lovers, artists and healers to support gentle, non-threatening and humorous expression on all aspects of feminine sexuality.And the masculine is celebrated as well.
Posted by: Bluto at
02:17 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: SeeMonk at August 13, 2006 02:41 PM (n4VvM)
Posted by: Hucbald at August 13, 2006 03:20 PM (dhslC)
Your levity is helpful, it relieves stress and stops him from thinking about death.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at August 13, 2006 03:21 PM (Bp6wV)
"So you see my dear wife, my idea about the leaf blower and the rubber chicken is perfectly safe."
Posted by: Graeme at August 13, 2006 03:43 PM (IUySj)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 13, 2006 04:29 PM (v3I+x)
Guess the Army was ahead of its time.
Posted by: hondo at August 13, 2006 04:30 PM (XrexX)
Posted by: joshua at August 13, 2006 04:47 PM (8g9JA)
Posted by: Paul Moore at August 13, 2006 05:35 PM (FTNCi)
Jimmy from Plains, GA.
Posted by: kraussm at August 13, 2006 09:16 PM (Q0B7p)
...leaf blower and the rubber chicken...
Now there's a doozie of a conversation, I'll bet. LOL!
Posted by: jesusland joe at August 13, 2006 09:48 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: RepJ at August 13, 2006 10:27 PM (L5LRS)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at August 13, 2006 11:39 PM (gLMre)
Posted by: Alain Claessens at August 14, 2006 05:29 AM (vK3We)
I thought I had seen it all.
Will they be using them in school too, as they are "educational"?
Posted by: Melissa In Texas at August 14, 2006 12:23 PM (bbxLM)
44 queries taking 0.0467 seconds, 483 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
