December 11, 2006

Leftist Blogger: 'Spitting on Soldier Not News'

"Phriendly Jaime" at West of Shockoe (the twit at Shockoe didn't realize that changing the title of a Blogger post also changes the URL, here's the new link) thinks prosecuting Lauren Maggi, accused of spitting in a soldier's face at Syracuse's Hancock Airport on November 22, is a waste of time.

And PJ has taken issue with me for blogging about the shameful incident. Unfortunately for PJ, he doesn't have his facts straight, but that doesn't prevent the typical, leftist rant that follows his snap judgement.

Worse, he doesn't think spitting in a soldier's face is a crime worth wasting taxpayers' money on, and anyway, PJ implies that the soldier is probably lying about the whole thing.

Phriendly Jaime's rant begins:

A few choice Republican "bloggers" are trying to make a story out of a laughable tidbit they heard on Fox news from Jon Gibson. This is what they report:
Syracuse radio station WFBL reports that Lauren Maggi, 35, of Thurber Street was charged with harassment for spitting in a soldier's face at Hancock Airport.
PJ's first mistake: Gibson's story came after my original post, and Jawa Report crosspost. That's why it quotes a radio station, which Gibson's piece does not; there was almost no posted news of the incident at the time. It was through research that I learned the proper spelling of Maggi's last name, and the fact (ignored by PJ) that she had been arrested for endangering the welfare of a minor in January.

Now PJ quotes information that became available later in the day, and with which both the Jawa and TDPB posts were updated:

The incident happened over the Thanksgiving holiday. Maggi approached a soldier from the 10th Mountain Division, who apparently was not in uniform, and asked if he was a soldier. When he said yes, Maggi allegedly spit in his face.
And this is what the majority of them DON'T report, because it makes their non-story a...NON-STORY.
Jason Jones, 21, told police a woman he did not know walked up to him near the United Airlines ticket counter, asked him if he was a Fort Drum solider and, when he responded that he was, spat in his face.

Police searched the airport garage and located a woman fitting the description that Jones provided, who was later identified as Maggi. Police escorted her into the terminal, where Jones identified her as the woman who had spit on him. A second soldier on the scene supported Jones' accusation, police said.

Maggi offered no explanation for her conduct, police said. She could not be reached for comment Thursday night.

I made sure to update with this information because it's so damning; the victim and a corroborating witness identified her, and she offered no defense, apparently not even denying the charge.

How does PJ interpret this news? Very strangely indeed:

Do you see what I am getting at?
No, thank God my mind works in a normal, rational manner so that leftist "thinking" is pretty much alien to me.
Someone, WITHOUT ANY PROOF WHATSOEVER, walked up to a police officer and told them "something". The officer found "someone" who matched the accuser's "description" and asked her what happened. She offered no explanation, yet she admitted nothing, and they charged her. Because there is no way to prove it happened, she'll go to court, and she'll most likely walk without being charged. So, in essence, Republican bloggers and Fox news would rather tax payer's money be wasted, all to try to make Democratic supporters and liberals look like they hate the troops. Real productive.
PJ, eyewitness testimony is called "proof." Another eyewitness other than the victim is called "corroborating evidence," and the fact that police were able to find Maggi based on the victim's description further bolsters his account of events. All of this will come out in court.

The best part of all of this? No one has any idea whether or not this woman is a Democrat. I hope someone asks her, because even if the story of her "harassment" is true, it would be too funny to watch the Republicans delete their blogs and forget the incident altogether to save face.
The word "Democrat" isn't mentioned in my post, though I think it's a pretty safe bet that a woman who spits in a soldier's face doesn't belong to the party of Lincoln.

Let's make this short, sweet, and to the point, shall we?

First of all, if a stroy [sic] is only reported on Fox News by Jon Gibson, it isn't news. Period. Do you see Democratic bloggers reporting things heard on Air America, without any reputable sources to back it up? No. So, be responsible and get some adequate sources before you let your fingers type nonsense and tripe.

But PJ, if you'd bothered to read the story, including the parts you excerpted, you'd realize that Gibson was the last one to the story, not the first. Let's review: I heard the story on WFBL radio, researched the name and came up with a bare bones blurb at Syracuse.com, as well as additional information about an earlier crime, and posted. Subsequently, Syracuse.com updated their site with more details, which I used to update my posts. I discovered Gibson's story today, and have mentioned it only in this post.
Second, by ignoring the whole story and only cutting and pasting the points that work for you, you make yourself even less credible than you were before. It makes you look, well, stupid, and people are left to wonder why you blog in the first place.
I have to agree with that statement, PJ, so tell us, why do you blog in the first place?
Lastly, distorting facts and truth is not blogging, it is a cry for attention and a sign of an emotional problem. People experiencing this ought to get themselves to the appropriate doctors as soon as possible.
Well, PJ, you've got your attention, are you enjoying it? Hope your doctor has an appointment opening up real soon. Maybe you should ask about Paxil and something to help your attention deficit disorder.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:54 PM | Comments (17) | Add Comment
Post contains 1025 words, total size 7 kb.

1 The cost of charging her? Isn't that what fines are for?

Posted by: Darth Odie at December 11, 2006 01:58 PM (YdcZ0)

2 What PJ fails to recognize is that, if the soldier fails to press charges, then in 20 years it will be claimed that the incident never happened. (Of course, PJ's already getting a jump on that revisionism.)

That is part of the core of Lembcke's claims about Vietnam vets being spat upon---why are there no stories about soldiers beating up those who spit on them, or pressing charges?

(Again, let me note that I think Lembcke's full of it, but the fact that you have revisionism on such a scale only means that, yes, you do have to press charges and take it to court and, hopefully, get the stories written up in the MSM.)

Posted by: Lurking Observer at December 11, 2006 02:12 PM (/ZD7V)

3 Methinks the Leftard protests too much.   He seems pretty defensive about the whole thing.  Gee, I wonder why.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 11, 2006 02:42 PM (8e/V4)

4 It is a good thing this did not occur in Texas.
Spitting on someone is considered assault!
PJ - What a moronic wretch!

Posted by: Melissa In Texas at December 11, 2006 03:33 PM (bbxLM)

5 Isn't spitting on someone considered an assalt? It is here in "Doity Joisey". In any case, if she'd spit on me I'd have,  (defending myself?), decked her.

Posted by: Pixelkiller at December 11, 2006 03:43 PM (Hs5GZ)

6 Bluto,

your link to the Leftard's site broke.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 11, 2006 03:44 PM (8e/V4)

7 Jesusland Carlos, the leftard in question didn't realize that by changing the title of her post, she caused Blogger to create a new URL. I just told her that I won't update the link unless she's nice to me.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at December 11, 2006 03:54 PM (vBK4C)

8 Opps I fixed the link.  sorry, I can break it again f you want?

Posted by: Howie at December 11, 2006 03:56 PM (YdcZ0)

9 Notice how phriendly jaimie deleted just about every comment that wasn't posted by a complacent Leftbot. 

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 11, 2006 03:57 PM (8e/V4)

10

She said she's turned on comment moderation because of "spam."


Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at December 11, 2006 04:03 PM (vBK4C)

11 She said she's turned on comment moderation because of "spam."

Yah, "spam". ROFLMAO!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 11, 2006 04:06 PM (8e/V4)

12 PJ is pissed because stories like this show just how much the left doesn't support our troops. She wants it to go away, so the Msm can get down to their real business of bashing Bush and the mission in Iraq.


Hm. She leans to the far left, she's dishonest, she's shrill, she's a lousy writer, and she wants America out of Iraq now. The AP will probably snap her up as a stringer.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 11, 2006 04:09 PM (bLPT+)

13 Another lefturd who needs a long drop on a short rope; nothing more, nothing less.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 11, 2006 05:48 PM (v3I+x)

14 PJ seems to be an idiot at her very best.
Maybe we'll get lucky and she'll kill herself.
If nothing else, the ignorant bitch should be grateful for the traffic.

Posted by: dick at December 11, 2006 06:21 PM (iDQvf)

15 The obvious truth of the matter is that, for PJ as for so many leftists, the law is only supposed to protect leftists. All others are fair game for assault and worse.

Posted by: pst314 at December 11, 2006 09:46 PM (lCxSZ)

16 Recently, West of Shockoe has been attacking SWAC Republicans (from the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia) with frightening voraciousness. I've called her out on my blog twice to step up to the plate to face those accusations of a 'non-story' as you have addressed on this site. She has not yet, to date, responded to my questions. Funny when Dems are asked to backup their facts and opinions, they simply cannot. Perhaps if she reads this post, she will take the time to respond to my questions. All of SWAC that she has personally attacked through blog posts and personal emails are waiting.....

Time to step up to the plate PJ...

Posted by: JohnMaxfield at December 12, 2006 04:54 PM (mK+50)

17 I'm very familiar with Leftists like Jaimie, who use the harshest tone and rhetoric against their opponents, but can't/refuse to engage even the most mild-mannered responses to their attacks.  They either ignore or delete.  Here she deleted almost all the responses and blamed it on "spam".  We know she's lying, and she knows we know, so essentially she's lying only to her own mind-numbed readers.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 13, 2006 12:31 AM (8e/V4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
41kb generated in CPU 0.0135, elapsed 0.0536 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0456 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.