Remember, the last time the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed organized a London protest, they vocally called for the Pope's death and carried signs reading, among other things, "Islam will conquer Rome". These are also the same guys who organized the Danish embassy protest, over the Mohammed cartoons, and were seen carrying signs that read "Behead those who insult Islam."

The call for Friday's protest came at a password protected website used by the six men who were arrested on Monday for encouraging terrorist acts and raising funds for terrorism abroad.

London police should be prepared and hopefully we can get some people videotaping the event. Generally, what they say is far worse than the signs they carry.

In September of 2006, the same group--on a now defunct website (thank us later for getting it shut down)--issued a similar call to protest the Pope. The signs carried by the protesters outraged many.

What crazy stuff can we expect at this protest? The announcement is below, in its entirety. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 02:34 PM | Comments (23) | Add Comment
Post contains 1070 words, total size 7 kb.

The list of the six Muslims arrested by British police yesterday. No one else, not even The New York Times, has this list more...

Posted by: Rusty at 11:09 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 505 words, total size 3 kb.

How we had the evidence on Izzadeen before he was arrested below.

UPDATE EXCLUSIVE: An Islamist forum connected with Omar Bakri Mohammed, and previously exposed here at The Jawa Report, has listed the names of the six terror suspects arrested today. Many of the names seemed mispelled, but here is how the forum listed them:

Abu Izzadeen from London
Abdul Haqq from London
Sulayman Keeler from London
Abu Muwaheed from London
Omar Zaheer from west London
Rajib Jhan (Khan) from Luton

All are followers of radical exiled clerica Omar Bakri Mohammed. The message also claimed those arrested were "victims of the British crusade", urged Muslims to pray for their release, and prayed that Allah would curse the kuffar (unbeliever).

Video of Abu Izzadeen here.
Video of Abu Muwaheed below.
Video of Sulayman Keeler here.

Another update: Is Abdul Haqq the Abdul Haqq Baker who is the head of the Brixton Mosque in South London where Richard Reid once attended?
-------

Abu Izzadeen, a regular target of the Jawa Report's ire, has been arrested---again. Five others were arrested with him.

Normally I'm happy whenever we take jihad supporters off the street. Today I don't think happy really describes how I'm feeling. More like ecstatic.

How come? Because I've been on a bit of a crusade against the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed for some time now and it looks like it's finally bearing some fruit. Sure, Izadeen was arrested once before, but this time it seems more serious. This time the charge includes fund raising for terrorists.

Oh, and this time I saw some of the evidence being used against Izzadeen before he was arrested. How is this possible? Well I can reveal that one of the informers behind the case is a friend, Glen Jenvey. Glen met with authorities a few weeks ago and passed along the videos and other information to them.

BBC:

Six men have been arrested on suspicion of incitement offences by anti-terror officers from the Metropolitan Police.

They include Abu Izzadeen, also known as Omar Brooks, who made headlines when he heckled Home Secretary John Reid at an event last year.

Five arrests took place in London and the sixth in Luton, Bedfordshire.

Scotland Yard said the arrests related to allegations of inciting others to commit acts of terrorism abroad and fund-raising for terrorists.

The BBC understands that the arrests are connected to an alleged incident at a mosque in 2004. The men were taken to an unnamed police station in central London.

The BBC understands that among the six arrested is Rajib Khan, a 28-year-old man from Luton.

The other men arrested are a 24-year-old, 35-year-old and 21-year-old, all from parts of East London, and a 27-year-old from Southall in the west of the capital.

Since Rajib Khan was picked up in Luton, could he be a relative of Sadiq Khan?

Allahpundit has two Izadeen videos up. Both of them are from Glen Jenvey and one of them premiered right here on The Jawa Report.

Jenvey just has tons of videos and audios of Izzadeen and other followers of Bakri Mohammed doing all sorts of stuff: praising terrorists, urging the death penalty for gays, inciting Muslims to kill the police, and even urging Muslims to give money to al Qaeda.

He also tells me that one of the men arrested is shown in this video. His name is something like "Keyla". Update: His name is Sulayman Keeler.

To be honest, Glen has sent me so much evidence that Abu Izadeen and the other al Muhajiroun goons, such as Anjem Choudary, are in bed with al Qaeda that I haven't linked 1/10th of it. It seemed literally pointless to point out the obvious anymore.

A month ago, after Glen sent me a link, I told him, "The thing is, don't you think he's pretty much exposed by now? I'm guessing your intel and police would love to get their hands on him." And guess what? They did.

And since Glen has been kind enough to keep me "in the loop", I would be remiss in not mentioning the book War of the Web: Fighting the Online Jihad which recounts Glen's involvement in the arrest of Abu Hamza and others.

All of these videos were originally set to "private" on YouTube and sent to me, but Glen had to change that setting to "public" once we started posting them. There are 55 videos in all, but we've only posted a handful here to this date.

For instance, here is a video of one of Abu Izzadeen's friends [update: this is of Abu Muwaheed, arrested today] urging Muslims to give money to terrorists. In it, he says, "Teach your children from a young age to spend money for the sake of Allah. To give money to the mujahidin." Then he breaks into Arabic but one word is apparent: Osama bin Laden. In the context of the speech he is giving it is clear he is urging people to give money to al Qaeda.

Video of arrested terror suspect Muwaheed below. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 12:21 PM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 1167 words, total size 10 kb.

An anti-war rally by followers of the radical Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir in London on August 19th. The group supports the establishment of a global caliphate and the imposition of sharia laws such as Muhammed's mandate to kill apostates. Moonbat media has the photo essay of these supporters of evil.

Posted by: Rusty at 11:54 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.

It's official, three men from Leeds have been formally charged as co-conspirators in the 7/7 London bombings which killed 52. The three are the first to be charged in that attrocity.

USA Today:

Britain charged three men Thursday with allegedly helping the four suicide bombers in the July 7, 2005, attacks on London's transit system that killed 52 passengers.....

The three — Mohammed Shakil, 30, Shipon Ullah, 23, and Sadeer Saleem, 26 — were charged with conspiracy to cause explosions on transport or at tourist attractions that could endanger life or cause serious harm.

Susan Hemming, head of the Counter Terrorism Division of the Crown Prosecution Service, said that the three men are accused of being "involved in the reconnaissance and planning for a plot with those ultimately responsible for the bombings."

UPDATE: Charles has video. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 01:12 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.

Previous:
Iran Claims All 15 Hostages "Confess"

Posted by: noburqa at 06:54 PM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.

More arrests in the London 7/7 bombings today. 7/7 has been called the U.K.'s 9/11. 52 passengers on various public transportaion lines in London were murdered on that day by Muslims inpired by al Qaeda. Police in Britain believe that al Qaeda may have been involved in both the planning and funding of the mass murder.

Guardian:

Three men were today arrested in connection with the July 7 London bombings, which killed 52 commuters on the capital's public transport system.

In the first significant arrests since the 2005 suicide attacks, two men, aged 23 and 30, were detained shortly before 1pm at Manchester airport, where they were due to catch a flight to Pakistan.

A third man, aged 26, was arrested at a house in Leeds shortly after 4pm...

It is understood the three arrested men are from Leeds. The property being searched in Colwyn Rd is on the same street as the house where Tanweer lived with his parents, who worked in a fish and chip shop.

Allah reminds us that there had previously been a link between the 7/7 bomb plotters and Leeds. You'll recall that Magdi El-Nashar had been 'detained' in Egypt in July of last year [pictured above right]. Authories found the substance TATP in Magdy al-Nashar's Leeds apartment, but he claimed the explosive 'wasn't his'. He was a professor at Leed's University. Interesting fact about Magdi El-Nasher: He spent a semester at North Carolina University in grad school studying biochemistry.

On a related note, in a British court today Manfo Asiedu, who was arrested two weeks after the 7/7 bombings, claimed that he had planned an attack which would be "bigger and better" than the transit system bombings. He's radically changed his defense from 'it was all a joke, we're victims of Islamophobia' to 'we were planning to blow up an apartment complex'. Apparently he's pointing the finger at another defendant at the trial, Muktar Said Ibrahim, as the ringleader. UPDATE: LGF has video here.

Allah also reminds readers of how 7/7 got to Abu Izzadeen's funny bone. And since we just ran a video of Abu Izzadeen a few days ago, you might want to go check out his sermon on Islam=terrorism. Be sure to wait til he begins justifying the beheading of Paul Johnson by the 'mujahidin'.

I have a friend in Britain who swears that if Izzadeen wasn't personally involved in the 7/7 attacks, then it was at least inspired by his mentor, Omar Bakri Mohammed. Here is a a video of Bakri Muhammed extolling the virtues of al Qaeda, shortly before the 7/7 bombings.

Video below--> more...

Posted by: Rusty at 01:20 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 449 words, total size 4 kb.

That’s right! In our quest to totally foul up TJR while Rusty is on vacation, Vinnie and I have added a new category. While working on this email a terrorist thread I noticed just how much stuff we have on Omar Bakri Muhammad.

Omar is a radical cleric who has been linked to al-Qaeda and other terror organizations and plots.

Here are a few examples.

(Audio) British Cleric Encourages Muslims to Behead Hostages: Birmingham Connection.

Exiled Muslim Cleric Behind London Protest Calling for Pope's Death.

Bakri Celebrates British Deaths.

When compiling these I have to get the post title and then google that to get the url, quite a pain in the arse. So, to make my life easier, our Editor in Chief, Vinnie added a new category for me. Without further delay I present to you the new category:

Great name huh? I figure it goes right along with the spirit and intent of MPJ. It will take some time to get all the posts moved under that category. Maybe forever, but until that time we will work diligently to accumulate all the posts on old goat humper into this one place. I’ve added a few already. You can access MPJ categories on the left sidebar.

Also to update Jawa readers on this post

The same server that contains Omar, The Goat Humping, Bakri Muhammad’s website also contains a number of Jihadi forums and websites. It has encryption, encryption hacking, hack tools, DDOS, various other worms and virus sites and a porn site. It is the remnants of a former ISP that specialized in carrying Jihadi websites and information. One of the websites was a favorite of the Madrid bombers.

I’m sure many of our British readers will be interested to know the same spew that resulted in the tube attacks is still being broadcast over the internet from Britain.

I’m not posting all the URLs for the sites due to the malicious software sites. But I can send them by request. I’ll try and keep you updated as best I can.

Hopefully these sites can be taken down and this provider found and prosecuted.

As a reminder of what the purpose of these sites are, here is a video of Omar, The Goat Humping, Bakri Muhammad talking about the UBL and the 7/7 London attacks before they happened.

Hat Tip: Glen.

Update: Heh

Posted by: Howie at 01:00 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 403 words, total size 3 kb.

1

Bakri is a menace to society. Why he is allowed to preach his garbage whilst living on the British taxpayer is unbelievable. I will be voting BNP in the next election as will many of my friends. We are just average Brits who have had enough of these muslims taking the piss in our country.

In some ways we are wasting our time fighting in Iraq, the war should begin here at home by putting these arrogant muslims bastards in their place.

Posted by: Jester at March 14, 2007 02:34 PM (iwtIO)

2 Keep shining those lights!                          USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 14, 2007 03:50 PM (2OHpj)

3 Ok so when I get time I'll have to linkwhore this. Remember to linkwhore this put...

Omar, The Goat Humping, Bakri Muhammad

with this link

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/cat_omar_the_goat_humping_bakri_muhammed.php

The idea is to get it high enough on google that when the bastard looks himself up (trust me he will, his ego is too big not top) he or his followers find this. 

Posted by: Howie at March 14, 2007 05:02 PM (YHZAl)

4 Nice idea Howie. The hate speech on his site towards "infidels" is surely enough to have him arrested under UK law....well maybe not as most UK law protects everyone except white folk.

Posted by: Jester at March 14, 2007 05:55 PM (iwtIO)

5 Oh you racist you. Don't you know better than to tell the truth. You are now branded a Nazi, racist, KKK'r, bigot and perhaps even a Republican.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 06:15 PM (W7E9s)

6 Greyrooster. Check out Omar Bakri Dipshit's site if you want to see one ugly muslim sonofabitch.

Posted by: Jester at March 14, 2007 06:20 PM (iwtIO)

7 I'm going to start a collection of ugly muslim inman pictures. Damn, I sitting here opeining my mail and I just got a check from Coastal Electric for $500.00. Says it's for a Comfort Advantage Retrofit. What the hell is that? I'd better not ask.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 07:27 PM (W7E9s)

8 The email a terrorist thread that this post updated is #1 on google news and # 10 on google.  I linked it back to this one.  Yeeehaaa !!!!

Posted by: Darth Odie at March 14, 2007 10:08 PM (YHZAl)

9 http://www.ilaam.net/Articles/DreamOfAntiIslam.html
 
Some of you might like to read this garbage and enter into debate with Dr Muppet. At least he reacts.

Posted by: Jester at March 15, 2007 07:35 PM (iwtIO)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

In this video a follower of Omar Bakri Mohammed laughs about 9/11. I mean really laughs. He seems to think of the greatest act of terrorism in U.S. history as a side-splittingly good time.

You'll also notice that he compares the hijacked planes several times to "when pigs fly". He says they use the same term in Arabic. I'm not sure whether he's referring to the passengers murdered on that day as pigs or whether he's simply using the phrase to make the point that September 11th was the long awaited, and unexptected by many, day when Muslims finally rose up and gave America its up-and-comings. My gut feeling is that he means it in both ways, but the thick accent makes it difficult to really follow him.

In any event, there is one thing that he gets right: 9/11 was a day when pigs were flying. But the pigs were the hijackers and mass murdering followers of al Qaeda. The biggest pig of all was Mohammed Atta.

Can any one identify the man in the video? Glen Jenvey identifies him as an "al Qaeda member", but I'd say it was more accurate to call him an "al Qaeda sympathizer". What I do know for sure is that he's a follower of Omar Bakri Mohammed. And a pig.

Exit question: Does Allah let flying pigs into paradise

UPDATE: Askand ye shall receive, I guess. Jeremy Reynalds, author of War of the Web: Fighting the Online Jihad says that this is Bakri follower, ABU WALEED.

Posted by: Rusty at 09:30 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.

The U.K. Muslim seen on a video supporting the beheading of British hostage Kenneth Bigley has been identified as Abdul Rahman Saleem, also known as Abu Yahya. Unsurprisingly, he is a follower of exiled British cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed.

I Googled his name and came up with a reference to him, right here at The Jawa Report. It seems that he was one of the characters behind a protest at the Danish embassy in which Muslims were seen advocating "Behead those who insult Islam":

Abdul Rahman Saleem, 31, of Poplar, (aka Abu Yahya) denied one count of using words likely to stir up racial hatred.

At the cartoon protest, Saleem was videotaped chanting:

"7/7 on its way" and "Europe you will pay with your blood" (Telegraph)

The video in which Saleem justifies the murder of Kenneth Bigley can be seen here.

Thanks to Jeremy Reynalds for helping identify Saleem. Here's a plug for his book: War on the Web: Fighting the Online Jihad.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:57 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 215 words, total size 2 kb.

Here is a video of British Imam Omar Bakri Mohammed urging Muslims to bring jihad to European soil. In it, he urges would-be jihadis to follow the example of the Madrid al Qaeda attackers and fight the infidels on their own soil rather than making Muslim lands the battlefield. 190 people died in those bombings.

The video is said to have been recorded in a London area community center, but you'll notice the sign above Bakri Mohammed reads something about "...cakes made to order". I'm not sure what, if anything, that means. Maybe the pro-jihad crowd was having a bake sale? You know, "Buy a halal cake and we'll send half the proceeds to bin Laden" or something like that.

The video is from Glen Jenvey, who sends his regards to Jawa Readers. If you want to read about how Glen was able to infiltrate both Abu Hamza and Omar Bakri Mohammed's inner circle, you can read about it in War of the Web: Fighting the Online Jihad

This People UK article suggests that this video is enough to finally indict Bakri Mohammed. You'll remember that after he fled Britain for Lebanon shortly after several of his follewers were rounded up on terror related charges that he was declared persona non grata in the U.K.:

Charles Shoebridge, a former counter-terrorism intelligence officer, thinks The People's evidence could be crucial in nailing Bakri, who lived in Britain for 18 years before he was banned from returning from Lebanon. Mr Shoebridge explained: "Just as once was the case with Abu Hamza, the authorities have been reluctant to act against Bakri.

"A reason given for this inaction was a claimed lack of hard evidence. But the videos show that this excuse doesn't stand scrutiny.

"After the 7/7 attacks, the Government made it an offence to glorify terrorism. Bakri seems to go well beyond this by apparently directly calling for attacks.

"On the face of it, these videos provide police with ample evidence to arrest Bakri should he ever set foot in the UK or any country with which the UK has an extradition treaty."

Video below -----> more...

Posted by: Rusty at 04:21 PM | Comments (30) | Add Comment
Post contains 429 words, total size 3 kb.

That man Tony Blair? He's got himself a set of cajones. Big ones.

The Telegraph:

Tony Blair defied an assassination threat from al-Qa'eda to take part in the Queen's Golden Jubilee celebrations in central London, it can be revealed for the first time....

Lord Stevens, talking for the first time about the alleged plot, said: "There was a threat against the Prime Minister over the Queen's Jubilee period. It was an assassination threat. There was good reason to believe that the threat was credible."

Lord Stevens, who confessed to not feeling the same degree of optimism, said that Mr Blair would not countenance withdrawing. "We went ahead. There were a lot of police officers around. There were lots of marksmen in the actual vicinity," he said.

"I remember sitting with him three or four along the line outside Buckingham Palace where I knew we were extremely vulnerable. I just looked out the side of my eye. There was not a shadow of any kind of fear. He had a job to do and he did it.

"You have to admire him and Cherie Blair, who also knew about the threat, for doing that. They showed great personal courage."

Posted by: Rusty at 10:13 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 1 kb.

An Islamic website linked to radical exiled cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed has announced that Bakri's lieutenant, Abu Izzadeen, has been arrested. U.K. newspapers are also confirming this. The specific charge is of encouraging terrorism.

The British website claims that Izzadeen was arrested "at the train station" and that Muslims should pray for Bakri. Other posters echoed the sentiment. "May Allah hasten his release," said one commenter.

"May Allah handle the oppressors, May He throw fear into there [sic] hearts, n [sic] direct his force against them.... May Allah (swt) make there plots against us a means for there [sic] own destruction!" said another.

Here's the website. The same forum recently described The Jawa Report as "a mix of red necks and swine eating pigs... most of which are made up of pedophiles and homosexual [sic]". We'll cop to the first two (rednecks and swine eating pigs), but I was under the impression that it was Mohammed who was the pedophile (eg, his marriage to the 6 year old Aisha, and his rape of her at 9) and that it was in Islamic countries where buggery runs amock!

Notice, too, that they site an ironic post by a commenter about finding justifications in the Bible for Christians killing Muslims. A) None of the authors of the Jawa Reports said that, it was a commenter B) The commenter was joking. A play on the injunction in the Quran for Muslims to kill Christians until they either convert or submit to Muslim rule.

Much more below the fold. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 09:49 AM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 354 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Wow! Its a good thing "most Muslims" are peace loving happy happy people. If 40% or 50% of them in the West were against us we might have a problem.

Posted by: Randman at February 08, 2007 10:56 AM (Sal3J)

2 Oh yeah.....good news

Posted by: Darth Odie at February 08, 2007 11:25 AM (YHZAl)

3 "a mix of red necks and swine eating pigs...

I guess that makes me the swine eating pig.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 08, 2007 11:29 AM (8e/V4)

4 I hope he gets raped by large inmates.

Posted by: MidnightSun at February 08, 2007 12:51 PM (tq7s9)

5 Muslims are swine and I have no intention of eating them. They are too hairy and boney and they smell bad.

Posted by: Jester at February 08, 2007 02:38 PM (iwtIO)

6 Since Britain has no death penalty, and long prison sentences are rarer than islamopithecines who walk upright, maybe Izzy can be sentenced to put on  assless chaps and go to a George Michaels concert.


But then, even if he is convicted, he'll probably be sentenced to community service. Preaching to school kids about the wonders of peaceful islam, or opening Parliament with a prayer calling for the death of pigs (Jews,) and monkeys (Christians,) is probably the most we can expect from the courts in Neville Neville Land. 

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 08, 2007 03:39 PM (Dt3sl)

7 You guys have no true idea about this website. I monitor these barbaric animals daily. Even when they claim to be peaceful with a little insite it's easy to see thru them. They are the reason I say much of what I do. I know they are reading the Jawa report. Muslims are swine eating dogs. Thats for you asshole muslims reading the Jawa report. It is true that if you register and have the slightest difference with them it will be deleted. IT IS A MUSLIM HATE BLOG AND NOTHING MORE. The Brits are crazy allow these backward islamic assholes in their country. Most of them are truly ignorant. The rest just hateful degenate rats. While pretending to be peaceful they are far worse than the terrorists. I have more respect for the stupid terrorists who kill in the name of their filthy religion than I do for these cowards who stand back and cheer the killers. They are lower than snake shit. Nothing but fornicators of goats because the women smell like camels. I piss on them and I piss on the phedophile mohammed.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 08, 2007 09:21 PM (ZAZT9)

8 GayRoofer, ever the voice of reason. Who even listens to you beside Muslims? Your rants are tiresome and bigoted - the only reason you are paid any mind since you fit so nicely with their view of Americans being just like you. Congratulations, now STFU for once please!

Posted by: tbone at February 09, 2007 02:32 PM (HGqHt)

9 Weebone, ever the voice of reason. Who even listens to you beside Muslims? Your rants are tiresome and bigoted - the only reason you are paid any mind since you fit so nicely with their view of dhimmies being just like you. Congratulations, now STFU for once please!


Cock nibbler.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 09, 2007 03:54 PM (Dt3sl)

10 Jeff, whip out a brain if you can find one and we can all try to nible on that.

Posted by: tbone at February 09, 2007 08:54 PM (iK3oF)

11 So now that we know where their site is ... is there anything cool we can do to/with it?                     USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 10, 2007 12:54 AM (2OHpj)

12 Oh, and Greyrooster .... All fame is fleeting          USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 10, 2007 12:55 AM (2OHpj)

13 Weebone:


"Brain?" Is that the latest euphemism for cock in the queer crowd?



Here's looking at you: Sucking my dick!

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 10, 2007 01:32 PM (Dt3sl)

14 Jeff, you little queen, we're still waiting... Don't worry, it happens to every man - I'm sure you can get at least one original thought all nice and hard for us... try to picture yourself in the library bathroom with GR in a burka...

Posted by: tbone at February 13, 2007 11:50 AM (HGqHt)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

If I didn't know better, I might suspect that this lady was being less than fully candid with the interviewer:

h/t : LGF

Posted by: Ragnar at 05:43 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.

Updates at bottom. Scroll down.

New developments on the raid that rounded up 9 Muslims suspected of plotting to behead a returned British Muslim soldier. Al Qaeda is now said to be behind the plot, and directed from Pakistan. At least two suspects remain at large. Also, a second Muslim soldier was targetted.

The message the beheading video would send was not only that the British should abandon Iraq and Afghanistan, but that Muslims serving in the UK are now considered "apostates". Apostasy is a capital crime under Islamic law, and beheadin apostates specificaly approved by Mohammed, the Muslim "prophet". The video would serve as a warning to British Muslims not to cooperate with the "kuffar' (unbeliever) nor to change their "deen" (Islamic way of life).

Further, one of the suspects may have served on the Muslim Council of Britain. Another seems to have been involved in the operation of a pool hall. A third was a part owner in a bookstore which sold Islamic jihadi propaganda masquerading as "documentaries", the former owner of which was a Guantanamo Bay detainee.

All this, and more, below. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 10:43 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 646 words, total size 5 kb.

1 After much research I have found a, until now, hidden commandment in the bible that says Christians are to kill muslims at every opportunity. It says that Muslims are the spawn of the devil. The word anti-christ means muslim. My religion commands me to destroy them. All Christians who do not believe this commandment will go to hell. We must do as God commands. Therefore, get out and do your part as a good Christian. Oh yea. This newly found passage also says any Christian that quits should be buried alive. This is part of religion and as a free American my rights to my religion are protected the constitution of the United States. Let us pray and get busy doing Gods work.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 01, 2007 12:44 PM (E7ALy)

2 I hope the British authorities use this incident as an opportunity to start reversing the Islamist invasion of England.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 01, 2007 01:48 PM (vixLB)

3 Greyrooster, will you shut up.  Please.

Posted by: Rusty at February 01, 2007 02:37 PM (JQjhA)

4 I hope the British authorities use this incident as an opportunity to start reversing the Islamist invasion of England.

You taking cash bets on that 

Posted by: Randman at February 01, 2007 02:45 PM (Sal3J)

5 Greyrooster, there are lefties who will take that remark seriously, and try to use it against those of us who ARE Christian.  I get your joke, but it has the potential to be a double edged sword. Not looking for an arguement, I just felt I should point out that possibility.                       USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 01, 2007 03:43 PM (2OHpj)

6 Hell, Greyrooster has a point. That is exactly what a large and growing number of Muslims are saying, and if you read the Koran, that is exactly what it commands.

Posted by: templar knight at February 01, 2007 04:01 PM (LFjVi)

7 Rusy: I'll shut up when you stop associating with muslims.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 01, 2007 08:00 PM (E7ALy)

8 I believe in this latest heretofor hidden commandment.  The lefturds and muslims have hidden this passage from us for a thousand years. What God commands we must do. GOD WILLS IT.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 01, 2007 08:03 PM (E7ALy)

9 <blockquote>Unless "Azzar" and "Iqbal" are common Pakistani names.</blockquote>

Your lack of knowledge is dazzling.

Posted by: merkur at February 02, 2007 02:38 AM (7oYoU)

10 And apparently so is my lack of html skillz.

Posted by: merkur at February 02, 2007 06:38 AM (7oYoU)

11 Michael: Not everyone is as gullible as Rusty. AKA light in the loafers.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 02, 2007 09:56 AM (daspa)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

In this two-minute audio clip, Omar Bakri Mohammed urges his followers to use whatever tools they have at their disposal in fighting the jihad. He claims those tools include beheading hostages. This message was recorded by Glen Jenvey on June 8, 2006--the day Abu Musab al Zarqawi, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq who beheaded British hostage Ken Bigley, was killed.

Why bring this up now? Omar Bakri Mohammed's al Muhajiroun followers congregate in Birmingham. The voice you hear is that of Omar Barki Mohammed, many of those listening to him would have been in Birmingham. It's not a direct connection, but it may have been a motivating factor in the plot to kidnap and behead a British soldier. Especially given that those involved in the plot looked to Zarqawi's example. Add moral justification to example and you have a recipe for action.

Audio below: more...

Posted by: Rusty at 03:56 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 2 kb.

Important Updates below. Scroll down for info on Moazzam Begg and other updates, including audio of British cleric, with large Birmingham following, praising the beheading of hostages

Another plot inspired by Abu Musab al Zarqawi. Have we finally witnessed the ascendency of the Zarqawi method of filmed beheadings for political gain among radical Salafi Muslims in the West? The plotters, it is said, wanted a repeat of the beheading murder of Ken Bigley---who was personally killed by Zarqawi.

The arrests were in Birmingham, which leads us to suspect that followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed, who have a large following there, were involved. One of Bakri Muhammed's followers is pictured right. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 12:32 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 979 words, total size 9 kb.

One that failed.

Stein hoist: Allahpundit.

Under the fold to save space and soothe Rusty's ego. more...

Posted by: Vinnie at 05:22 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.

Best part? When followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed cry out from the viewers gallery. I mean, what could be more unjust than convicting a guy for inciting people to kill infidels and blasphemers?

The Guardian:

A Muslim demonstrator who took part in a protest march against cartoons of the prophet Muhammad was found guilty today of calling for the murder of American and Danish people.

There were shouts of protest from the public gallery as Umran Javed, 27, from Birmingham, was found guilty of soliciting murder and stirring up racial hatred during the demonstration in London last February. He was recorded on a police video shouting "Bomb, bomb Denmark. Bomb, bomb USA" to fellow demonstrators.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:55 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.

Remember our good friend Anjem Choudary? He's Omar Bakri Mohammed's right-hand man in Britain. Rarely, if ever, do we get such a clear expression of the beliefs of Salafi Muslims than in this BBC interview with Choudary

Here is the money quote, as Choudary tries to clarify Shiekh Omar Bakri's stance on killing the infidels:

BBC: Your own leader, Omar Bakri [Mohammed], said quite simply "I condemn the killing of innocent people" on the 20th of July. Why won't you say what he says?

Choudary: At the end of the day, when we say "innocent people" we mean "Muslims". As far as non-Muslims are concerned, they have not accepted Islam. As far as we are concerned, that is a crime against God.

And if you don't remember Choudary, he's the head of The Society of Muslim lawyers in the UK who says that the Pope shoud be executed. For suggesting Islam might be violent. Yup.

He's also the guy behind the London cartoon protests. You know the one. Where he distributed (Bakri always gets Choudary or Izadeeen to do the dirty work) posters to his followers saying "Be prepared for the real holocaust" and "Behead those that insult Islam".

You can also see Choudary spouting off here (second vid).

Hat tip: Ben who saw it on Kate's blog.

Posted by: Rusty at 10:12 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.

Legal pluralism is all the rage in Europe and among American legal academics. The concept is that different laws should apply to different groups within the same country. This is why Canada allows some religious courts legal authority. The same applies to Britain. No joke.

The scary thing, is that it could happen here too. It's all the rage in law schools. And young lawyers today become tomorow's judges......

Dread Pundit Bluto has the details. But here's a teaser from The Telegraph:

Faizul Aqtab Siddiqi, a barrister and principal of Hijaz College Islamic University, near Nuneaton, Warwicks, said this type of court had advantages for Muslims. "It operates on a low budget, it operates on very small timescales and the process and the laws of evidence are far more lenient and it's less awesome an environment than the English courts," he said.

Mr Siddiqi predicted that there would be a formal network of Muslim courts within a decade.

Posted by: Rusty at 10:31 AM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Aqtab Siddiqi: "It operates on a low budget, it operates on a very small timescale and the process and the laws of evidence are far more lenient..."
 
Sounds like a carefully worded description of a lynch-mob.
 

Posted by: forest at November 29, 2006 11:58 AM (zjut/)

2 Correct me if I'm reading this wrong - it seems that the police arrested those responsible, but witnesses and the victim showed little interest in pressing charges (and, presumably, providing statements), thus leading to the release on bail of the suspects. At which point, a totally non-official bunch of elders got together, and hashed out an arrangement with *no legal footing whatsoever*, which could not possibly have been pursued in a UK court. A gentleman's agreement, if you will.
 
The UK has no 'religious courts legal authority', nor will it ever have. Get your facts straight. As for Bluto's ridiculous assertion that what is effectively an out-of-court settlement poses a 'direct threat to [British] sovereignty' - get a grip. This is pure hyperbole.

I'm not in any way speaking up in favour of what occurred. I certainly do not believe in this 'legal pluralism' nonsense - I've no time for minorities trying to create their own encampments within our borders. But this particular story is a non-event.

Posted by: Joe Public at November 29, 2006 02:56 PM (mVxdj)

3

Sharia law could come to the U.S. Some form of it may already be here!

Parties, muslim or otherwise, could agree to submit to Sharia law in civil matters where state and federal law does not otherwise exempt such by statute or case law. They could mutually agree as to the Rules of Evidence to be used (or agree to none at all), who will arbitrate the case, and the degree of weight given to the testimony of a witness i.e. greater weight accorded to the testimony of witnesses who are Muslim with less weight given to women and/or infidels.

This is something the mutually agreed parties could legally do now in civil cases in accordance with Sharia law, subject to state and federal law and governed thereby.

It's called arbitration. Parties can mutually agree to enter into binding arbitration, mutually choose the arbitrator or tribunal to hear the case, and mutually agree on the particular body of law, i.e. statutes and case law, to be applied.

See also: [Link: www.mediate.com...]

You've probably have entered into arbitration agreements and perhaps don't even realize it, i.e. a clause in a credit card application and/or their associated "terms of use" addendum, which become effective usually upon your first use of the credit card where arbitration, in lieu of the Courts, is agreed upon and/or you are deemed to have consented to arbitration by said use, and said arbritration case will be determined under the laws of a designated state like Delaware. Most states, if not all, allow for mutually agreed upon arbitration that will be binding in the Courts upon the parties with few exceptions and/or conditions.

As the BBC article stated: "This is because under English law people may devise their own way to settle a dispute before an agreed third party." Unless a statute states otherwise, we in America operate under English common law.

However, keep in mind that parties can NOT agree to arbitrate criminal cases. The article is correct when it stated: "What they mustn't do - and this must never happen - is to stray into the field of criminal matters. That simply would never be acceptable."

In a criminal cases, the victim is not a party that can agree to arbitration. The STATE or FEDS are the aggrieved party not the victim. And it goes without saying, that the accused does not have a right to arbitration in a criminal matter.

As to remedies in those cases eligible for arbitration, i.e., like contract disputes, Muslims need to realize that the prevailing party is not entitled to a severed head, limb, and/or beating for the losing partys failure to abide by a term in a contract like a default on payment. Such act and/or remedy would be deemed a crime.

Posted by: FLLaw33870 at November 29, 2006 02:57 PM (38GUY)

4 If anyone other is feeling guilty about anything I will be sitting magistrate in the Buddhist court in Manhattan.
For those out of staters we will be offering a fly-in fly-out service at all 3 of the major metropolitan airports.
A bit of professional advertisement here....                                    STAY AWAY FROM THE CATHOLIC COURTS

Posted by: John Ryan at November 29, 2006 03:03 PM (TcoRJ)

5 This is being blown out of proportion. What we are talking about is people privately settling disputes out of court, except instead of doing it in someones house over coffee they are doing it with a religious leader of some sort present - that's all! Arbitration has been going on for centuries, no-one is claiming that these courts have or should have ANY legal power or be mandatory in ANY way what-so-ever - you either take them or leave them.

The problem is that while we waste time on stupid non-issues like this, there is a very REAL and growing risk of hostile take-over and implementation of actual sick laws and punishments such as blasphemy law, stoning and amputation - these real threats are being ignored while we piss around with century-old arbitration crap and veil-banning.

Posted by: Johnny Nox at November 29, 2006 04:40 PM (eb3vN)

6 John Ryan: You little prick. You were doing well, then you had to bring someone elses religion into it.

Posted by: Greyrooster at November 29, 2006 06:13 PM (0TutP)

7 Muslim arbitration has allowed women to be treated like chattel in Canada. It's even gone so far as to allow forced clitoral mutilation and beatings.


Why couldn't it happen in Britain? The Brits are even further left than the Canucks, and islam already has an Empire within British borders.


Joe, can you fly the Union Jack wherever you want, and wear a t-shirt with a pig on it wherever you want? Just curious.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 29, 2006 07:28 PM (bLPT+)

8 Bargholz - all I can say is that the media, the bits you over the pond get to hear, are vastly out of touch with feelings on the ground. Don't beleive the hype.

Posted by: Joe Public at November 29, 2006 08:13 PM (mVxdj)

9 Oh,. and in answer to your question - yes, I can fly the Union Jack wherever I please, and I can wear a pig on my chest if I so choose. As for the Cross of St George - England, not Britain - well, the lefties frown upon that...

Posted by: Joe Public at November 29, 2006 08:15 PM (mVxdj)

10 This is being blown out of proportion.

Women have virtually no rights under sharia law, but no big deal says the Leftwing multi-cultist.  Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 29, 2006 08:47 PM (yJKSD)

11 Apparently the concept of equality before the law means jack with this talk of sharia courts in the west.  I wonder how those of african descent, who fought for so long for it, will feel about this growing trend when it starts rearing its head more often here in the States.

Johnny Knox, if they (muslims, leftists, take it how you want) follow their normal pattern, once they get civil courts they'll start in on wanting their own criminal courts.  You're already starting to see it in some parts of the states with language-specific courts, so why wouldn't they push for ethnic or religious specific courts as well?

Posted by: Ranba Ral at November 29, 2006 09:32 PM (VvXII)

12 Joe:


You guys with your feet on the ground better take control of your country back from the cretins who are running it before it's too late.


I see the same thing happening to us here. Things like Pelosi and the San Fran contingent gaining power, while a candy-assed freshman Congressman gets lippy with the President, are good indications of how much power the left has wrested from normal folk.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 29, 2006 09:54 PM (bLPT+)

13 I saw this link at a previous thread.
Its suppossed to be a Lebonese girl, and the guy who left it was saying 'this is what they want to kill'

Well, Sharia kills this ...

http://ikbis.com/beirut%20girl/shot/1300

Sharia kills all that is good about that link.
Sharia is poison to the water of freedom.

Frankly, the adoption of any Sharia court in the USA must constitute a direct attack on American soil. Whatever soil such a court occupies, will be in enemy hands while that court remains. it should be the obvious duty of any citizen who loves his Constitution, and honors the founding fathers, to strike against such an abomination on US soil.

Is that 'felonious' enough for everyone?

USA all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 30, 2006 04:17 PM (2OHpj)

14

It won't happen. The inhuman barbarity of sharia law is a documented fact. Much as they might bleat about low-level shit such as community arbitration, even the left would get nervous about implementing sharia as an alternative legal path.

Posted by: Joe Public at November 30, 2006 07:14 PM (AZum7)

15 Nice to see you Joe Public.

I think you have a lot of good points. I would only be concerned that Sharia is actually advancing itself in subtle ways. Some 'arbitration' has allowed women and children to be abused even in non-muslim families.

I have seen slippery slope legal precedents take hold in parts of Montana, where out of state enviromental groups negotiate with federal agancies, and the people of the state I live in get bypassed. Just as one example.

Sharia is way more dangerous, and I think it is correct of us to watch what legal decisions are reached based on faith courts.

I would rather see a provision for hardship ruling system dealing with religious belief, in a regular secular court. A secular court could provide a layer of protection to family members who do not want a Sharia style decision, but are pressured by family, and community. The court provides a scapegoat for the victim to shift blame to.

I don't know, its complicated, and I just want to see thright thing done.

Guard those flags and the pigs as well

USA all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 03, 2006 12:57 AM (2OHpj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

The Nobel Prize noble no more. You really need to read Bruce Bawer's article today. Not just because The Jawa Report is mentioned. Okay, that would be reason enough. Just go read it.

He adds even more to the controversy surrounding the Nobel invitation to Yusuf Islam (formerly Cat Stevens) to perform at this year's Peace Prize shindig. Yusuf Islam admits that he supports capital punishment for blasphemers. Some peace train you got there Islam.

Ironically, Yusuf believes that 'the gospels' also call for murdering those that blaspheme. Which is quite absurd. Unless I missed that part about Jesus stoning the blasphemers. Maybe it's somewhere in the back?

The Sun:

There is reason to be dismayed by the Norwegian Nobel Committee's anointing of Yusuf. This is, after all, a man who's been denied entry into America and expelled from Israel.

After the publication of the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, he was quoted in the New York Times as saying that if Mr. Rushdie came to his door for help, "I might ring somebody who might do more damage to him than he would like. I'd try to phone the Ayatollah Khomeini and tell him exactly where this man is."

A Web site called the Jawa Report claims that Yusuf has performed at fund-raising events for charities with connections to terrorist organizations. On the same Web site you can also read claims that he is an intimate of the Islamist Omar Bakri Mohammed and of Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, who is now serving a life sentence for terrorist activities.

Perhaps the barring of Yusuf from America and his expulsion from Israel were based on misunderstandings; perhaps he was misquoted on Mr. Rushdie, and perhaps the Jawa Report is mistaken.

But Yusuf's own statements on his own Web site are not so easily dismissed. On that Web site he claims that he "never called for the death of Salman Rushdie; nor backed the Fatwa issued by the Ayatollah Khomeini," even though he feels that Mr. Rushdie's book "The Satanic Verses" "destroyed the harmony between peoples and created an unnecessary international crisis."

But then he adds the following: "When asked about my opinion regarding blasphemy, I could not tell a lie and confirmed that — like both the Torah and the Gospel — the Qur'an considers it, without repentance, as a capital offense. The Bible is full of similar harsh laws if you're looking for them. However, the application of such Biblical and Qur'anic injunctions is not to be outside of due process of law, in a place or land where such law is accepted and applied by the society as a whole."

What does this mean? It means this: Yusuf is not against the idea of Mr. Rushdie being executed for writing a book. He is simply acknowledging that in Britain and other Western countries, the proper Islamic punishments do not apply. Yet.

Hat tip: Glen Jenvey, who is also the guy who grabbed the audio linking Cat Stevens to terrorists.

Posted by: Rusty at 09:10 AM | Comments (31) | Add Comment
Post contains 514 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Yikes! A F-16 went down outside of Baghdad. The rocket scientist at ABC
radio just announced that only the pilot was aboard. Whew...glad he
didn't have passengers hanging on to the wings.

Posted by: Randman at November 27, 2006 10:35 AM (Sal3J)

2 Yusuf Islam can go screw himself.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at November 27, 2006 10:59 AM (vixLB)

3 ... And I support the use of AC130's to cut through Jihad like a hot knife through butter.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at November 27, 2006 11:00 AM (vixLB)

4 When he says this, ""When asked about my opinion regarding blasphemy,..."
he gives a non-answer.  This is not his opinion on blasphemy
itself, but his opinion on how it is, or is not, applied.  If he
answers the question, "Do you support Sharia Law?"  well, then, we
have a real answer.

Posted by: Oyster at November 27, 2006 11:26 AM (SCVhh)

5 like both the Torah and the Gospel

Moral equivalency -- apparently Yusuf has has learned well from his Leftwing patrons.  Is this an example of a "moderate" muslim?

Fortunately he's wrong.  The Torah doesn't call for the death of blasphemers nor heretics, nor did Jesus.  In fact, if you read the prophets, their main job was to bring the people of Israel back to God whenever they fell away from him (which happenned often).  Nowhere did it call for executing hereticss or blasphemers because half of Israel would have been guilty of that! 

Re his comments about the "Gospel", he's obviously not read it.  Jesus was surrounded by blasphemers at all times, and he allowed himself to be nailed to the cross.  That was HIS job.  Jesus came to this earth to be humiliated for our sakes, not exalted (unlike Mohammed).

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 27, 2006 11:49 AM (8e/V4)

6 I would always defer to any guy named Jesusland, on this subject.

Posted by: Randman at November 27, 2006 12:36 PM (Sal3J)

7 Last time we discussed this asshole the defenders of everything different called those of us who questioned his loyality ignorant. Not who is ignorant? Hope you same assholes have something to say concerning your previous comments on this subject.

Posted by: Greyrooster at November 27, 2006 01:39 PM (aghaS)

8 You guys are all ignorant son's of behives. Thats all i can say. They say kill you, you say kill them. No difference. Only thing is you hate them more than they hate you.

Posted by: Dumd Whitey at November 27, 2006 01:42 PM (ORzZP)

9 those beliefs are mr. yusuf islam's religion, and you have to respect them.

Posted by: salaam at November 27, 2006 01:51 PM (NzayJ)

10 Got a few muslim excusists on this topic. You bet I hate islam more than they probably hate me but I'm working on the balance.
 
Yusuf Islam has no beliefs of value and nothing to offer the world. Death to this liberal flake......and his music is a load of bollocks too.

Posted by: Jester at November 27, 2006 03:31 PM (iwtIO)

11 You guys are all ignorant son's of behives. Thats all i can say. They
say kill you, you say kill them. No difference. Only thing is you hate
them more than they hate you.



I think we have a winner for todays moronic moral realitivism statement of the day.

Posted by: Randman at November 27, 2006 03:32 PM (Sal3J)

12 Dumd Whitey, you are a moron.  That's all I can say. You casually equate us with the terrorists just because we believe the enemy needs to be killed.   If we really hated them more than they hate us, maybe they'd be given some pause before they decided to torch another school, bus, or embassy.   If they were building schools, buses, greenhouses, and hospitals instead of destroying them we would love them. 

Posted by: George guy at November 27, 2006 03:44 PM (eWkFC)

13 Oyster:


Yusuf said that the koran considers apostasy a capital offense.As a muslim, he does indeed support this barbaric practice, and went on to say that muslim societies should practice it.


He was quite clear on this point, which would make you quite full of crap.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 27, 2006 04:06 PM (bLPT+)

14 Comment #9 "you have to respect them" No I don't. The guy's a muslim. The lowest creature on earth. Just like you.

Posted by: Greyrooster at November 27, 2006 05:24 PM (aghaS)

15 Exactly grayrooster, we don't have to respect his religion of hate and death, we don't have to like it, and we don't have to put up with it.  Personally I don't have to hate it either, anymore than I would have to hate a rabid dog to put it down.

Posted by: Buzzy at November 27, 2006 06:26 PM (CXz7T)

16 This is SO not news. I'm feeling a YAWN coming on again...

And *what* kind of newspaper is The Sun, again?

I highly doubt that Yusuf is worried about either the Jawa Report or The Sun. I wouldn't be, if I were him.

He may have been wrong about the Gospels, but I think the point he was trying to make was that blasphemy is not entirely an alien concept.

Anyway... I thinks he's moved on.. which maybe we should do.

Posted by: LD at November 27, 2006 06:48 PM (cCiqp)

17 http://www.stazzz.net/shemales.php shemales pictures

Posted by: shemales pictures at November 27, 2006 06:56 PM (I7rOd)

18 Yes, I understand. But still, isn't this old news? I don't see anything new about it.

Posted by: LD at November 27, 2006 07:01 PM (cCiqp)

19 Yes, I understand. But still, isn't this old news? I don't see anything new about it.

[reposted to follow Jesusland's -- which somehow ended up *below* my initial post]

Posted by: LD at November 27, 2006 07:14 PM (cCiqp)

20 I still say it's OLD NEWS. OK, I see some people still need to have the last word. Whatever.
|
|
V

Posted by: LD at November 27, 2006 07:18 PM (cCiqp)

21 I think the point he was trying to make was that blasphemy is not entirely an alien concept.

The point WE'RE making is that executing people for blasphemy IS an alien concept and has no place in western society regardless of whether Yusuf says it"s in the Bible (it isn't).

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 27, 2006 07:54 PM (yJKSD)

22 "I'm bein' followed by a cruise missile,
Cruise missile, cruise missle..."

Posted by: mojo at November 27, 2006 09:10 PM (v3Oz/)

23 LD (little dick, leftist dork,)



The Sun is the kind of paper that doesn't print absolute bullshit. If it did, it would be the Times.


Cat-shit Stevens meant to let dhimmies know that islam was irrevocable, and that leaving it was a death sentence.


He can never move on because he's a muslim. He's stuck in the seventh century under pain of death.



The only old news I see is assholes like you apologizing for the crimes of islam. Thanks for supporting gang rape, clitoral mutilation, and the slavery of women, scumbag. I hope the next person who escapes the straightjacket of islam kicks your faggoty ass.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 27, 2006 09:53 PM (bLPT+)

24 I don't know why you've suddenly decided I'm one of your punching bags,
Jeff, but your constant foul-mouthed attacks on me and others are
completely unnecessary.  If you have a point, make it. 
Slinging invectives at those around you doesn't serve your argument
well.



My point was that he needs to answer the question more succinctly
rather than just associatively.  I'm sorry you missed that. 
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough.

Posted by: Oyster at November 28, 2006 07:18 AM (YudAC)

25 Oyster:


Stevens did answer the question directly.


As far as my use of the word "crap" goes, welcome to the real word. I wouldn't want to use a naughty word like "crap" around someone with a nice, repectable screen name like "Oyster," now would I?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 28, 2006 09:14 PM (bLPT+)

26 Here's a Muslim to you. BOOOOOOOOOOOO! I can imagine how you all fill your pants right now. Now go vandalise a Muslim grave, throw a stone at a mosque or something, in order to heal your demented fear of otherness.

Posted by: Muslim at December 02, 2006 01:59 PM (l73rN)

27 Here is a proof that Bible orders killing of blasphemers (source www.biblegateway.com):

"Leviticus 24:16 (King James Version)
King James Version (KJV)

16 And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death."



There you have it. And won't even start on what Jews are supposed to do to non-believers.

Posted by: hab at December 02, 2006 03:39 PM (l73rN)

28 jonny613

Posted by: jonny699 at December 11, 2006 04:20 AM (QbGjZ)

29 jonny806

Posted by: jonny592 at December 11, 2006 04:20 AM (QbGjZ)

30 jonny9

Posted by: jonny8 at February 13, 2007 08:48 PM (/wHPX)

31 jonny17

Posted by: jonny13 at March 27, 2007 10:35 PM (2HzC3)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

I'm reposting this link to a lengthy BBC report about homegrown jihad in the U.K. because it is important that you see it.

Watch it here. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 07:07 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 241 words, total size 2 kb.

The BBC has a new 'investigative' report which concludes that Islamic extremists are using the internet to recruit, train, and incite jihad in the U.K.

Gee, ya think?

Most of what they report is what we've been saying for, I dunno, years. And the specifics? Well, we've been reporting that Shiekh Omar Bakri Mohammed has been leading his followers in Britain from exile for months.

But we do have some news that the BBC still doesn't have or can't release due to British censorship laws. Scroll down for that.

That Bakri Mohammed intimated that it was okay to bomb airports.

That he and his followers praise the 7/7 bombers.

That Omar Bakri Mohammed continued to direct followers of his banned group via the internet from exile in Lebanon.

That a secret group called Vigil has been monitoring the followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed and pressuring the British government to act.

You can watch the BBC story by clicking here (opens page with player)

[UPDATE: Glen e-mails and says that this is BIG NEWS in the U.K. today. Good. He also forwards this link to a much more extensive version of the story. The video runs about 50 minutes. It's worth the watch

Pay attention to the parts where the British government does nothing. Scary.

Joel also e-mails to let me know that this Brit, blogging from Londinistan, also notices the story]

Here is some of the print version:

A banned cleric is still preaching support for terrorism to young British Muslims by appearing incognito on the internet, the BBC has learned.

The joint investigation by File on 4 and Newsnight has found Omar Bakri Mohammed broadcasts hatred for the UK using a variety of pseudonyms.

He was excluded from the UK last August on the grounds that his presence was "not conducive to the public good."

On a recent broadcast he said the 7/7 London bombers were "in paradise."

You'll remember that it was Glen that caught Omar Bakri Mohammed talking about the terrorist ties of Cat Stevens' (aka Yusuf Islam) and sent me the recording the other day.

And speaking of leads supplied to me by Glen Jenvey, he and I have been going back and forth over something else for a few days. Remember Mizanur Rahman? He is the follower of Omar Bakri Mohammed who was just convicted of inciting racital hatred, but who was acquitted of charges of inciting murder.

You'll recall that Mizanur Rahman's arrest came following his involvement in the Danish cartoon protests. At the court hearing, he gave a non-apology apology. The British authorities are now contemplating retrying him.

Well, it seems that while Mizanur Rahman was out of jail on bail, but still on trial, that the 'repentent' Rahman was still chatting with the other brothers in Omar Bakri Mohammed's online group. And what does he say?

If you're in the U.K don't read any further. Why? British censorship laws prohibit publicly airing evidence which might be used at trial. But hell, I'm not in the U.K. Oh, and screw censorship! So, read on. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 04:53 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 739 words, total size 6 kb.

A reader dropped this link in the comments. It is supposed to be Cat Stevens (aka, Yusuf Islam) singing the praises of the Taliban in Afghanistan.

You can listen to it by clicking here. It's called Afghanistan: The Land of Islam.

I'd love for somebody to debunk it. I just don't have the time right now for extensive Google searching. The brief Google search that I did seems to indicate that Yusuf Islam really did write and perform the song about 'the land of the free'....you know, Taliban Afghanistan.

I want to believe that Cat Stevens is just a dupe who didn't really support terrorism. That he's like the millions of Muslims around the world that gives to charities and doesn't really know that the money is going to terrorists.

Of course, since audio of Omar Bakri Mohammed claiming that Yusuf Islam used to associate himself with convicted terror master mind Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, and that he used to send money to the families of the 'Mujahidin", it's becoming harder and harder to believe that.

Hat tip: The Welsh Witch

UPDATE: Yusuf Islam's new album comes out today.

UPDATE II: I've done some more Google searching. From what I gather, the song was written by Yusuf Islam, but never recorded by him. Also, at least one Islamic website claims the Islam wrote the piece after the invasion of Afghanistan by the Soviet Union.

So, giving him the benefit of the doubt, the mujahidin that he is praising are anti-Soviets, ie our former allies. Some of whom became the Northern Alliance....others, well, you know who they became-

Here are the words to the song: more...

Posted by: Rusty at 01:12 PM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 551 words, total size 4 kb.