jawa.mee.nu

March 26, 2007

Kurt Russell IS Snake Plissken!

So, they're remaking Escape From New York with Gerard Butler (King Leonidas in "300") as Snake Plissken. Apparently, the original Snake Plissken ain't too happy:

I will say that when I was told who was going to play Snake Plissken, my initial reaction was ''Oh, man!'' [Russell winces]. I do think that character was quintessentially one thing. And that is, American... messing with Snake Plissken is a whole different level of heresy... People come up to me and say, ''You played Snake Plissken.'' I didn't play Snake Plissken, I created him! ...
What if they asked you to do a cameo in the new Escape from New York, or play the Ernest Borgnine role?
F--- that! I am Snake Plissken! It's like Sean Connery always watching someone else do their version of Bond.... He's a fascinating character. In fact, he's the most complex character I've ever played.

Posted by: Ragnar at 08:31 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Oh please. Glad his ego is not getting in the way of art.

Posted by: Randman at March 26, 2007 09:57 PM (Sal3J)

Certain roles = certain actors. Steve McQueen = The Blob Kurt Russell = Escape from New York This is CRITICAL for sanity. Right? Right!!

Posted by: codekeyguy at March 26, 2007 10:21 PM (+WuRB)

3 Ego? Maybe. But is he wrong? There is no Snake Plissken without Kurt Russell. It's like Austin Powers without Michael Meyers. It's like Indiana Jones without Harrison Ford. I like Gerard Butler just fine, but Kurt Russell was BORN for that role.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 26, 2007 10:24 PM (8e/V4)

4 Artists are notoriously incapable of objectively evaluating their own work. Kurt was THE BOMB as Todd in Soldier. His best role by far.

Hell, even McGyver made a better Jack O'Neil.

Kurt was also the weakest link in Tombstone.

Grindhouse looks promising, however.

Posted by: Hucbald at March 26, 2007 11:45 PM (5HcjW)

5 "Kurt was THE BOMB as Todd in Soldier. His best role by far." I absolutely agree, though I do think Pliskin = Russell. About "Soldier", I had a good friend of mine who thought that was the worst acting he'd ever seen, and that became quite a discussion. Acting isn't showing emotion, it's showing the appropriate emotion at the appropriate time to tell your story. Kurt handled that role as well as I've ever seen any role handled by anyone. Awesome film.
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 27, 2007 03:32 AM (2OHpj)

6 Kurt == Snake.

However, I think banning Kurt Russel from playing Snake again might be fitting punishment for the "surfing" scene from the Escape sequel.

What's an even bigger horror is Will Smith playing the Charlton Heston role from Omega Man. What's next, Jack Black playing the Alec Guiness role of Col. Nicholson in a remake of "Bridge on the River Kwai"?!?!?

Posted by: wooga at March 27, 2007 07:49 PM (t9sT5)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

It's Raining (300) Men

Can't get the wife to go with ya to see "300"?

Here's a trailer just for her.

Posted by: Ragnar at 12:55 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.

March 21, 2007

Just a little bit of hero worship...

Robert A. Heinlein Centennial
Hyatt Regency Crown Center & Westin Crown Center
Kansas City, Missouri â€“ July 6-7-8, 2007

July 7, 2007 will be the birth centennial of American author, futurist, philosopher and spaceflight advocate Robert A. Heinlein. Commemoration and celebrations will fill the science fiction Grandmaster's Centennial year, with the grandest event to be held on the weekend of July 6, 7 and 8 in his home town of Kansas City, Missouri.

For more information, click here.

Posted by: Kafir at 12:32 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I liked his works "Starship Troopers" and "Puppet Masters".
But I don't agree with his philosophy of ethics.
Myself, I cann't imagine "correct" ethics without belief in the Supremacy of the Almighty.

[Incidentally, the God that I believe in doesn't have to bribe me with promises of 72 virgins and such. His grace alone suffices me in both this world and the next.]

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 21, 2007 02:16 PM (j97MF)

2 I grew up reading and loving the Heinlein books.

Posted by: Randman at March 21, 2007 02:41 PM (Sal3J)

3 His short story "Requiem" should be required reading for anyone who does not understand the ideals that move our military personnel. Written in flashback, it demonstrates the dedication, ideals, honor, love and selflessness that make a difference.

Posted by: Writer at March 21, 2007 03:30 PM (iL9qH)

4 From the same movie ...  Johnny Rico: Someone asked me once if I knew the difference between a civilian and a citizen. I know now. A citizen has the courage to make the safety of the human race their personal responsibility!
       USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 21, 2007 06:33 PM (2OHpj)

5 For the record, we the people, are the militia! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 21, 2007 06:34 PM (2OHpj)

6 Jean Rasczak: When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force. And force my friends is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 21, 2007 06:36 PM (2OHpj)

7 While I agree with the premise of Citizenship and Duty; I believe that God is the Supreme Authority from which all just authorities flow.
Indeed, and please correct me if I'm wrong, the oath of allegiance in your country does invoke the Name of the Almighty; does it not?
And would it not be fair to say that the spirit of Citizenship and Duty flow from the spirit of that oath?

Sorry, I don't mind to sound preachy. I'm just a moralist.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 21, 2007 06:48 PM (j97MF)

8 Garduneh Mehr, you are also wise.
"God shed his grace on thee" I'm there. Honestly, God is the most powerful force in any case. Having given us free will, he has left us to make responsable choices, and he has also left us responsability to protect ourselves, and the gifts he gave us. Whether you believe in God or not, a wolf will likely eat you if you are not strong enough to kill it. Likewise a tyrant will enslave you if you are not strong enough to disuade him. Likewise, self destructive, delusional hedonists will drag you down with them, if you do not break thier grip upon you. God helps those who honor him, by helping themselves in the first place. it builds our character

                       USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 21, 2007 10:04 PM (2OHpj)

9 As for my desire to uphold free expression, I don't get mad at people for leaving out the "under God" part of the pledge. God can sort that out with them later if he chooses. I do get mad when they won't even make the Atheists version of the Pledge, yet try to call themselves US citizens. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 21, 2007 10:07 PM (2OHpj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Rusty Shackleford Sings "Hillary Clinton is a Man"

We already knew Rusty was a genius, but didja know he plays guitar, too?

h/t : Michael Weaver

Posted by: Ragnar at 01:32 AM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.

March 20, 2007

Elsa Pataky Naked Topless Photos UNCENSORED

I don't know who this chick is, but she's got a perfect pair of ya-yas.

The uncensored photos of Elsa Pataky are here.

UPDATE: Turns out she's the chick from Snakes on a Plane.

Posted by: Ragnar at 10:05 PM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I took her cruising in my sexy hybrid.

Posted by: Ragnardo Di Canneskjold at March 20, 2007 11:14 PM (b0FZu)

2 Those are fake tits. Do you like fake vaginas too?

Posted by: Ragnardo Di Canneskjold at March 20, 2007 11:15 PM (b0FZu)

3 You got to love Ragnar... More ya-yas please!!

Ragnardo on the other hand must like dick a lot to be dissing this chick.

Posted by: Alex at March 20, 2007 11:37 PM (u+USN)

4 Heh. If "fake vagina" is a creative way of offering me your bunghole, I'm really not interested--flattered, I suppose, but not interested.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold, Arrogant Prick at March 20, 2007 11:45 PM (p5NDs)

5 Admit it, Ragnardo--you just don't like boobies. Likely something you experienced as a child. You need to get past it, dude. Either that, or embrace your hunger for the schlong.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold, Arrogant Prick at March 20, 2007 11:50 PM (p5NDs)

6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76Piz991rdk
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 21, 2007 02:09 AM (2OHpj)

7 Ragnar, I said nothing about bungholes, schlongs or not liking boobies. Those are all your own thoughts, which give us insight into what kind of guy you are. I for one am not surprised.

Posted by: Ragnardo Di Canneskjold at March 21, 2007 02:48 AM (b0FZu)

8 Alex, why the sudden interest in dick?
Dick was not on anyone's mind but your own.

Posted by: Ragnardo Di Canneskjold at March 21, 2007 02:54 AM (b0FZu)

9 Oh mama, careful with those two, she can take someone's eye out. She's definitely gets the two thumbs up over the dumbass 3 posts down.

Posted by: MK at March 21, 2007 04:32 AM (hqUGy)

10 DROOL...................DROOL.....................DROOL.........................

Posted by: doriangrey at March 21, 2007 07:14 AM (F5T2G)

11 Oh and did I mention DAMN.......................DROOL...DROOL...DROOL..................

http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

Posted by: doriangrey at March 21, 2007 07:26 AM (F5T2G)

12 Fake or not...

I'd hit it.

Posted by: Farmer Joe at March 21, 2007 09:36 AM (gDNGv)

13 Perfect ya-yas to go along with the rest of a perfect bod...... yummy !!!!!!

Posted by: memphis761 at March 21, 2007 10:19 AM (YHZAl)

14 Ragnardo -

One of us posts pictures of hot naked women. One of us complains about the hot naked women. You do the math.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold, Arrogant Prick at March 21, 2007 10:57 AM (lcY81)

15 For the record, I'm done complaining about any chic pics. Balance has been brought to the Force, and we are getting more articles that are actually about something besides sleek, but trashy women. There was a time when that was all I cared about ...

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 21, 2007 11:59 AM (2OHpj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 15, 2007

Surprising Confessions from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

The MSM's been reporting quite a bit on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's recent confessions, including alleged plots to kill Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. Although KSM's voluminous confessions on high-profile terrorist acts have received plenty of coverage, I was a bit surprised to see that the reports omitted several of KSM's more surprising claims.

Most stories failed to mention, for example, KSM's claims that he... more...

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:35 PM | Comments (20) | Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 2 kb.

Wait till they find out this is a picture from Roosters honeymoon....... Enough publicity for this f*cker ( judge darth encounter astrick...lucky he takes bribes!) all ready. That's a mistake. Even with this rooster glamor shot, he shouldn't get the face time, it encourages others as a reward for murder. And that's just in our own part of the world. Remember that many of the drones can't read and rely on pictures. It shows how being educated carries with it an obligation to present the truth to those unable to learn for themselves. Must be nice to be as care free as the Rooster......runnin around the barn yard, little wings flappin and crowin at the moon.....of course here on Grand Isle, we don't have any chickens so we use sea gulls and broken down old white pelicans......

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 07:36 AM (tclwJ)

2 provided the seed funding for the film "Battlefield Earth

That by itself is worthy of torture.

Posted by: Randman at March 16, 2007 08:21 AM (Sal3J)

3 So that was the bastard behind New Coke, hang the SOB

Posted by: memphis761 at March 16, 2007 08:28 AM (YHZAl)

4 He also produced Spys Like Us. Had a cameo part as a hopping buzzard. Rooster was originally cast for the part... but refused to be kept in an aviary with black buzzards, something about a bad experiance in a juvi lock up. Boy is he going to kick my ass when he reads this shit.......

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 08:40 AM (tclwJ)

5 Black Buzzards: No they are considered inferior. And they don't hang around in aviaries. They are called ghettos. Where they shit and throw garbage on the ground. Today you will find them hanging around watermelon fields and mail boxes on the first of the month.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 16, 2007 09:03 AM (1AhUe)

6 Boy this guy is ugly. Going to put his picture on page 1 in my ugly muslim book. How can all those black muslims call this garbage heap their leader? Guess ugly attracks ugly.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 16, 2007 09:06 AM (1AhUe)

7 That's why I love you so much Roosty........

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 09:17 AM (tclwJ)

8 Grand Isle? There's no Ghettos on Grand Isle. Of course Grand Isle is a ghetto to some. Where did you park your fema trailer? Thinl I'll drive now there and look aground. Might have some cheap lots.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 16, 2007 09:30 AM (1AhUe)

9 I'm on the first right after you cross over Elmers Island, look for the broken cooler with sand for sale sign......

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 09:36 AM (tclwJ)

10 When are you coming? I'll throw another gull on the grill

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 09:44 AM (tclwJ)

11 That list of great crimes KSM might have confessed to is kind of funny until you remember his #3 claim was redacted.

#3 on his greatest hits against the great satan, right after WTC93 and 9/11. Which stands alone in being redacted by the Pentagon when clearly bullshit (Bali), previously undisclosed, and nuclear-reactor-scary plots were not.

So I'm guessing you could probably add TWA-800 to your list or one of the 90s ME bombings attributed to a different foe. Less funny.

Posted by: Luka at March 16, 2007 10:25 AM (aOeXm)

12 TWA800: Never swim on a full stomach or fly on a less than full fuel tank. What a crock. Thankgoodnes stingers won't fire on planes in America so all those missing ones ( was it.... 23 or 26 admitted to) can't hurt us. Yep, nothing ever happened on bills watch that needed to be taken seriously..... I'm sure it would never on hillary's either. Except for the American gun nuts needing to be taken out.

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 10:54 AM (tclwJ)

13 I suspecteced the redacted claim was twa 800 as well.

Posted by: Howie at March 16, 2007 10:57 AM (YHZAl)

14 Hey, I watched the air saftey board blow up an identical plane in simulations to show fumes would ignite in lesser circumstances than TWA-800 experienced. There's no question there's a plausible way it could and probably did blow up without intent.

I don't generally don't go in for conspiracy theories. But Peter Lance's "Triple Cross" account of the one-man al-Qaeda superman is a pretty far out there conspiracy theory tale until you verify that Ali Mohammed did precisely everything he said.

100% of anyone would call that conspiracy theory bullshit till they learn it isn't. Thing is he wrote about Yousef organising TWA-800 from prison too.

2 guys with a hobby of putting bombs on planes. One goes to jail and tries to use TWA-800 for a mistrial. What else would the 2nd guy rate that high and the Pentagon not want to have to deal with discussing.

Posted by: Luka at March 16, 2007 11:38 AM (aOeXm)

15 I saw the same documentary. I didn't buy it and never will. Not just based on that but the ancillary reports of boat activity in the water and the witnesses who stated that they saw a light come up from the water at an interecpting trajectory. Both north and south of where it occured. The goverment has come up with its own version of a great deal of things and how they happened. But they have never come clean on Ruby Ridge, Waco or this. Truth is always the first victim in war.

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 01:34 PM (tclwJ)

16 as opposed to boat activity on the land..... sheesh.

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 01:35 PM (tclwJ)

17 Either is possible on the TWA thing. Most likely the fuel tank blew up like they said. But as I reacal that's just what NTSB says. Most likely not 100% certain. Of course KSM would claim it in either case. I just thought it was likely that that was what KSM said.

Posted by: Darth Odie at March 16, 2007 02:42 PM (YHZAl)

18 Judge Odie, this fruit cake would take credit for my ingrown toe nail if he thought it would heap more glory on his cause. It doesn't really matter if he did all of these things or not, what he's part of did. I would like to see his face as about often as I see noriagas. Publicity for this goon is not a good thing.

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 02:51 PM (tclwJ)

19 wb: Gulls? Thought you guys ate possom & taters this time of the year.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 16, 2007 11:05 PM (uy6LN)

20 Have you ever seen a freaking possum on Grand Isle before? Well , maybe the occasional floater from Bridge City

Posted by: wb at March 17, 2007 04:26 PM (s6CsG)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 14, 2007

"300": Most Important Piece of Propaganda Made Since 9-11 (Sticky, Scroll Down For New)

I just saw "300". It is probably the most important movie made since 9-11.

As you know, I wasn't going to see the movie for fear that it would be a 2 hour advertisement for joining the gays. You know, something about a bunch of guys prancing around in banana hammocks that creeps me out. To quote Sarah Silverman: it doesn't really matter if you're homosexual or bisexual--both are equally gross.

But watching Sout al-Kuffar's mash-up today, I said to myself, self, let's go see that movie. You are on vacation, after all. And it was a kick ass mash up. So I went. I wasn't disappointed.

I know enough about history to know that the movie was terribly inaccurate. I also know enough about both Sparta that if given the choice of living under the Persian yoke or the Spartan yoke, I'd gladly take Persia.

But this movie was fiction. No, more than fiction. This movie was propaganda.

But longtime readers know how much I believe in the necessity of propaganda. Propaganda is neither good nor bad. Propaganda is about adding purpose to ideas. It is only when either those purposes or those ideas are bad, that propaganda becomes a problem.

There was no hidden agenda in "300". It was not a "metaphor" about Western Civilization standing up against the Asiatic hordes. There is no Rorschach effect here as I thought going into the movie--Leftists and Islamist apologists seeing the Persians as a metaphor for U.S. imperialism, while those on the Right and Liberals of all stripes seeing Sparta as representing the U.S. fight against Islamofascism.

Not hidden, but explicitly stated. The characters come right out and say that Sparta is protecting Enlightenment principles of reason, freedom, and liberty from the "Asiatic hordes". They actually use those words--"Asiatic hordes".

And, what did the "Asiatic hordes" look like? Muslim jihadis.

And, no, I'm not reading anything into the movie here. That is exactly what they looked like. Not the leaders, but the warriors. All except the Persian "Immortals", who were obviously modeled after Japanese Samurais--down to their swords.

The vast majority of Persian warriors looked like this:

You're telling me I'm "reading something into that"?

Or how about these guys, with more than a passing resemblance to Hamas fighters or any number of would-be shahids about to commit suicide?

And the dialogue? Puh-lease! It's absolutely thick with the notion that the Spartans are fighting for freedom and liberty defined exactly in the Western Enlightenment sense of those terms. The dialogue consists of only three themes: liberty, sacrifice, and gay jokes. And the monologues are strictly about the first two.

Any Leftist, Islamist, or other hater of Western values who saw this as a "metaphor" for oppressed people around the world fighting against the vastly superior power of the U.S. is simply deluded.

Sometimes a rose is just a rose. And sometimes the rose is a metaphor for something else. But I got news for you: a picture of a giant penis isn't a metaphor for something phallic. It is phallic.

I'm not even going to explain the larger point of this great piece of propaganda. It is simple and straight forward: Western civilization is worth fighting for.

There are some more subtle messages in their, too. Like: Professional warriors fight and die so that people like you and me can become philosophers, artists, and politicians.

Oh, there's more. Much more.

The propaganda, it is oh-so-beautiful. It rivals anything put out by Republic Pictures or Warner Brother's animation during WWII. Heroic Americans fight the Hunnish/Asiatic hordes (many seem to forget that it wasn't until after WWII that our movies redeemed the "Germans" by separating them from the "Nazis"---part of the Cold War propaganda effort).

In fact, I'll go out on a limb and compare this to Eisenstein's Ivan the Terrible, Part I--that classic piece of Soviet propaganda which artfully legitimized the Stalinistic purges as an effort to consolidate state power in the face of a foreign menace (Ivan as Stalin, the boyars as anti-revolutionary forces, and the Turks as the Germans). And who would argue that Eisenstein's masterpiece wasn't needed to help the war effort? Or Bugs Bunny? Or John Wayne?

No, "300" brings us back to the good-old days of propaganda. When propaganda was produced in support of our country. When propaganda was produced to remind us that we are the good guys and that our ideals are better than the ideals of our enemies.

Go see "300". If you don't like it you probably hate America. That, or you're gay.

Posted by: Rusty at 09:37 PM | Comments (106) | Add Comment
Post contains 775 words, total size 5 kb.

1 They actually use those words--"Asiatic hordes".

I positively LOVE that. Call it a backlash if you will. I'm sick to death of the and political correctness foisted on the West by the Leftwing 5th column.

All you have to do is listen to Frank Miller's interview on NPR to know he meant it as pro-Western propaganda. It's about FRIGGIN time.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2007 10:54 PM (8e/V4)

2 "It's about FRIGGIN time" It sure is! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 13, 2007 11:02 PM (2OHpj)

3 I saw it the other day on IMAX and, other than the thirty foot wide man stuff, it was fantastic! It must leave a gay man conflicted, so much gay but so much good.
Does anyone else think the casting director has a thing for hard, thimble-like nipples?

Posted by: TBinSTL at March 14, 2007 01:03 AM (MSiPb)

4 Never posted before... never seen a need to. But A-MEN.

It's always nice to see pro-Liberty propaganda.

Peace.

Posted by: Berkeley Non-Conformist at March 14, 2007 03:13 AM (WmT3N)

5 Hollywood sees the threat from this movie... in both a financial, and philosophical way...

Financial? Because it had no big names, was filmed for 60 million and pulled in 70 mill its first weekend due (IMO) to positive messege and action... it prooves you don't need Cruise et al for a success.

Philisophical because we now have a very populat movie with an undisguised Pro West messege... and that the West is worth fighting for...

LOL... evil thought... could you imagine Spartan Border Control agents???

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 14, 2007 10:16 AM (v1/4E)

6 Words can't describe the idiocy behind leftists and terrorist-sympathizers comparing mujahideen to the Spartans. I know I shouldn't be surprised by outright lies, weakly-founded propaganda, no testicled arguments and the sheer moronic statements, but it does surprise me. It's like watching a kid walk into a wall, a dog bite itself and yelp, a cat trying to jump up on a counter and completely missing while colliding into the side of a cabinet and then looking pissed ... why must the world of today be a constant battle against a bevy of retards? Is this what democracy and free speech bought us? So imbeciles could try to create truth by shouting the loudest and repeating falsehoods?

Posted by: MidnightSun at March 14, 2007 10:25 AM (8t7Mg)

7 Its not like DANCES WITH WOLVES its a prowest movie thats not PC

Posted by: sandpiper at March 14, 2007 11:04 AM (ILvmZ)

8 Nice speech. But you will never change the left.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 11:09 AM (W7E9s)

9 I agree, it's wonderful to see propaganda that points out that our enemies aren't just evil, they're not human.

Like Sparta, America would be a much better nation if we took infants from their families, killed the weak children, and raised the strong children to be a warrior-servants of the state.

Posted by: Warrior at March 14, 2007 11:28 AM (HXMaW)

10 I agree, it's wonderful to see propaganda that points out that our enemies aren't just evil, they're not human.

That's pretty much what you Leftards say about Republicans.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 11:50 AM (8e/V4)

11 Leftists? No, you've got it all wrong. I'm 100% pro-American, but I wish that America was more like Sparta. Spartans were REAL men. When they were infants, they were taken away from their mothers. The weak children were killed while the strong children were trained from an early age to be warriors. Spartan children were routinely flogged, and if they cried or showed weakness, they were further flogged.

When Spartan males were first sent off to battle, their rite of passage was that they were given a shield by their mothers, who told them to return victorious or return as a corpse. Spartan men who refused to fight for their city state were killed as traitors.

In other words, Spartan culture was entirely centered on patriotism and strength. They killed off their weak and celebrated the strong, and so these 300 should be heroes because they were strong.
If only America had such patriotism.

Posted by: Warrior at March 14, 2007 12:00 PM (HXMaW)

12 Trackbacked by The Thunder Run - <a href="Web">Web'>http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2007/03/web-reconnaissance-for-03142007.html">Web Reconnaissance for 03/14/2007</a>
A short recon of whatâ€™s out there that might draw your attention.

Posted by: David M at March 14, 2007 12:05 PM (kNjJk)

13 I planned on going to see it this weekend. Thanks Rusty!

Posted by: Scoreboard44 at March 14, 2007 12:07 PM (YDGU0)

14 Leftists? No, you've got it all wrong.

No, I'm pretty sure I got it all right. But if you're not a Leftwing troll, then you're just a moron.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 12:34 PM (8e/V4)

15 Poor attempt at a Moby Troll.

The "spartans did bad thing 'x,' so therefore we shouldn't emulate them in any aspect" makes as much logical sense as "Hitler was a vegetarian, therefore we should not be vegetarians." Makes for useful snark, but it isn't an argument.

Tell you what "Warrior," why don't you pick one culture or nation in history that accomplished something or just exhibited some particular characteristic trait YOU think we should emulate, and then we'll all make sarcastic comments about the repugnant aspects of that culture, without uttering a single word actually rebutting you.

Then QC and I will engage in a week long circle jerk, and all will be right in the universe.

Posted by: wooga at March 14, 2007 01:03 PM (t9sT5)

16 Warrior: But were they anal retentive?

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 01:04 PM (W7E9s)

17 wooga, I think that "300" is a vindication of the Spartan culture. They were a strong people and they gained that strength by breaking down the weakness of their citizens at a young age. They placed love of Sparta above love of themselves. Everything they did was for Sparta.

The West has traditionally demonized Sparta and celebrated Athens for being enlightened, but I think they had it wrong. Athens was weak and politically correct, and their "philosopher kings" were unrealistic. Leo Strauss reminds us that righteousness is really the ability to impose your will upon others, and that sometimes we need to lie to achieve our ends.

So I say that this should be a lesson to the traitorous left. They say that Bush lied - I say we should thank Bush for his lies, because if they are lies, they are rallying us to victory over the enemy.

Posted by: Warrior at March 14, 2007 01:12 PM (HXMaW)

18 Caveat: Vinnie just reminded me that Black Hawk Down was post 9-11. But it certainly wasn't so overt as 300. It might have also had various interpretations. But one thing is for sure Team America: World Police was AWESOME propaganda.

He also thinks Tears of the Sun was useful propaganda, but I didn't care for it that much.

Posted by: Rusty at March 14, 2007 01:12 PM (oPDPJ)

19 Killing babies? You mean like having an abortion if the baby doesn't fit your lifestyle? Gee, those Spartans were more "advanced" than I thought.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 14, 2007 01:13 PM (p52Ne)

20 "America loves a winner, and hates a loser. As a child we always love the fastest runner, the greatest ballplayer, the toughest boxer." George S. Patton

Let's not create a caricature. If we're to interpret this as propaganda, and compare America to the Spartans, it's that only the strong can succeed in America. People who were failures, outcasts, cast-off remnants of other nations came together to form the strongest nation in existence.

America has a collection of all the misfits, anarchists, communists, and others who have had to flee their home nations. Those who were strong survived, those who were not moved to Canada (A joke, I don't want to attract any Canadian death-squads).

On the other hand, let's not pretend this aspect was immaterial. It was the foundation of the Spartan ethos. However, it has little to do with the story.

This is about an Ethos that is so powerful to capture warriors who have been hardened from Birth on. It is an Ethos that has captured the strongest, the hardest, the most vicious and the most terrible as well as the wisest. This Ethos is Freedom, Liberty, Honor, and Glory. The Spartans, who kept slaves, compared themselves to the Persians, where every man was a personal Slave to the Tyrant who ruled. In Sparta there were few Free Men (All free men were in the military, everyone else were primarily slaves), but in Persia there were no Free Men.

THAT is the difference. This can truly be a story between America and the Mujhadeen in this sense: America is not perfect. America is not utopia. But America is damn, DAMN better than they are.

We may have few Free Men, but they have none. And Three-Hundred gives them a face to go with the souls that worship death.

Posted by: Berkeley Non-Conformist at March 14, 2007 01:33 PM (djoRJ)

21 you jawas are confusing a comic book with actual history...never mind that the real spartans were the gayest of the greeks...their wives had to have their hair shorn on their wedding night so they would look like boys. otherwise their spartan husbands would not touch them.

not only are you confused about that, but also the spartans were largely responsible for extinguishing the world's first democratic government and turning it into an oligarchic tyranny. so i guess it is fitting that the jawas would engage in spartan cock worship...y'all dont give a damn about democracy...only war as a spectator sport.

sure...enjoy this pro-america propaganda...if it makes you feel like men for an hour and a half by all means watch it. i thought it was a good movie too...but it condemns bushxerxes more than you want to admit.

allahueckber

Posted by: salam alaykoom at March 14, 2007 02:03 PM (SdWFu)

22 Leo Strauss

Give it up already. The only people I've ever heard cite Leo Strauss are Leftwingers-- as the embodiment of neocon evil on earth. Not ONCE, have I seen a neocon, nor anybody on the Right cite him on a blog for any purpose whatsoever. So the gig is up, aighty?

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 02:08 PM (8e/V4)

23 salam alykoom, the Delaware jihadi: your squeals of outrage are like nectar. Thank you!

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 14, 2007 02:12 PM (p52Ne)

24 Leo Strauss reminds us that righteousness is really the ability to
impose your will upon others, and that sometimes we need to lie to
achieve our ends.

Really. You're not even a good Moby Troll.

My knowledge of Strauss' specific writings is extremely limited, so I'm not going to challenge your claim that Strauss actually thought this. Assuming he actually said that, I can't think of a single prominent "neo-con" Strauss fan who would actually embrace that notion. It is certainly elitist and morally reprehensible.

"By any means necessary" is a concept I only hear coming from the left at the moment. If you truly are a Strauss follower, could you identify some prominent leader who actually fits your model of righteousness?

Posted by: wooga at March 14, 2007 02:14 PM (t9sT5)

25 never mind that the real spartans were the gayest of the greeks

Once again throwing gheys under the bus for a few cheap points on a blog.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 02:16 PM (8e/V4)

26 the Delaware jihadi

Notice these filthy jihadis always want to live the America, the very country they despise the most on the planet. At least Leftards can actually claim this is home and that's why they don't leave. But these filthy America-hating jihadis? Get the fuck out of my country. Go back to that muslim sewer of a country your rapist father conceived you in, you cunts.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 02:26 PM (8e/V4)

27 If you truly are a Strauss follower, could you identify some prominent leader who actually fits your model of righteousness?

Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. Both leaders used "noble lies" that saved millions of lives.

I can't think of a single prominent "neo-con" Strauss fan who would
actually embrace that notion. It is certainly elitist and morally
reprehensible.

The fact is that political leaders must necessarily tell a convincing story, sometimes a false one, in order to gain support for what is necessary. Themistocles, the commander of the navy that gave Leonidas cover, knew that the Persians were going to invade, but his people would not support a naval build-up. So he LIED to his people and told them that another city-state was planning to fight them for resources, and as a result he got the ships he needed.

Plenty of supporters for the liberation of Iraq argue that it doesn't matter why President Bush SAID that we went to war, only that we DID go to war. Do you disagree with that?

Posted by: Warrior at March 14, 2007 02:38 PM (HXMaW)

28 Warrior,

So necons lie to achieve their ends, just like you're lying right now about being a rightwinger to achieve yours. You see, Leftards lie all the time to achieve their ends. No wonder they always cite Strauss.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 02:44 PM (8e/V4)

29 So necons lie to achieve their ends, just like you're lying right now about being a rightwinger to achieve yours.

No, I just think that the story of the battle at Thermopylae shows that sometimes we have to fight dirty. It vindicates the Spartan culture. Strauss, along with Carl Schmitt, remind us that when we face great challenges that winning is the most important thing. The war against Islamo-fascism is the greatest threat that America has ever and will ever face, and yet people are afraid to say that we need to do what it takes to win. Even supporters of the war SAY that we should do whatever it takes, yet they do everything they can to say that we don't torture people. Perhaps we do engage in real, unrestricted and brutal torture, not just the stuff that people pass off as "frat pranks," and perhaps the government is lying about it to keep support of the war up. Is that a problem?

Posted by: Warrior at March 14, 2007 03:05 PM (HXMaW)

30 No, I just think that the story of the battle at Thermopylae shows that sometimes we have to fight dirty.

The Spartans didn't fight dirty, so it shows nothing of the kind.

Nor do we have to fight dirty to win this war. We just have to fight. But so far your Lefty pals have shown no willingness to do so.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 03:19 PM (8e/V4)

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 14, 2007 03:52 PM (Zm5ve)

32 I guess Jesusland doesn't understand the connection of influential members of the administration to Strauss. Strauss' influences were Carl Schmitt, Friedrich Nietsche and Martin Heidegger. These were all great philosophers and were also the basis for the founding ideals of the National Socialist Party. He was put through school with grants from the Rockefeller foundation(is he a lefty?). His influence is spread far and wide in the administration through the likes of Libby, Wolfowitz, Schulsky, and Feith.

And Warrior, you consider the left traitorous(a lot of them are), when there are those in the administration that spread Nazi, fascist values. Are they not traitors? Or should we point out a famous traitor, namely Prescott Bush? Let us not forget that he was doing business with Fritz Thiessyn throughout WW2? Should we support the grandson of a traitor, who has blood money in a trust fund set up for him by his grandfather?
Or are you saying we should support the nation state, regardless of who is in power, as Sparta would have been?

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 14, 2007 03:52 PM (Zm5ve)

33 This so called warrior commenter sounds a lot like another. Does "jalal", "peter (topgun) micheals", "baghwan jabituya" sound familar there warrior. I suspect you're just another little sock puppet of all the others. You're a fake. Buh bye

Posted by: Skul at March 14, 2007 03:59 PM (vDwj7)

34 With all the dust this has raised, I've got to see this movie. Siskle & Eibert did'nt have nuthin'on ya'll.

Two other movies come to mind that didn't get the same response but had a similar thread, Lord of the Rings and Conan the Barbarian. (Not to be confused with Gonad the Conehead starring Grey Rooster & Queen LaTeffa) Both could be interpeted as a stand against islam. Both made the point that is relevant and that being you have to cut the head off the leader for victory.

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 04:20 PM (Cxxtv)

35 righteousness is really the ability to
impose your will upon others,

This is the part I'm stuck on. I can see the "noble lie" under a lesser of evils justification (although the liar would still have to pay the penalty for lying - he would just recognize that the penalty was 'worth it').

But who actually think "might makes right?" And isn't that the opposite of the message in the 300, where the Persians won the battle despite being the bad guys?

You are getting your villains confused. Reagan and Thatcher were villains of the left because they are "moral absolutists." They believed in the existence of good and evil. You know, the whole "evil empire" speech which got panties twisted throughout Europe. That is the opposite of the 'Straussian' (as you describe him) notion that power is what defines morality and "righteousness."

Anyway, you seem to be honing your Moby ways, as you are at least trying to defend your position with argument rather than throwing out racial slurs (which is what most Moby's think is good 'conservative camouflage').

Posted by: wooga at March 14, 2007 04:22 PM (t9sT5)

36 when there are those in the administration that spread Nazi, fascist values

What a fucking caricature you are and not original at that. Yawn!

Posted by: Randman at March 14, 2007 04:46 PM (Sal3J)

37 What a fucking caricature you are and not original at that. Yawn!

Oh, I'm hurt. I guess I should capitulate to your greatness. Fucking loser.

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 14, 2007 04:49 PM (Zm5ve)

38 Gaycocklover? Why the hell would you come up with a name like that?

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 05:04 PM (W7E9s)

39 Gaycocklover? Why the hell would you come up with a name like that?

Because it's true. I love cock, and I'm gay. The moniker fits.

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 14, 2007 05:07 PM (Zm5ve)

40 Why is warrior on the shit list? Someone jumping to conclusions here? Sounds to me like a young man who has been watching the history channel.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 05:12 PM (W7E9s)

41 wb: That's two. Sure you want to go for three?

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 05:12 PM (W7E9s)

42 Because it's true. I love cock, and I'm gay. The moniker fits.

I can see the simple logic of that. But I don't call myself StraightPussylover just cause I'm straight and I love pussy.

What is it with gays that you have no identity outside of your gayness. Everything is gay gay gay.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 05:22 PM (8e/V4)

43 greyrooster: sorry for being fascecious. My moniker is alluding to the homosexuality practiced by the warrior classes of era's gone by.

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 14, 2007 05:24 PM (Zm5ve)

44 Ya know rooster? I've been pretty tolerant of your bullshit. If you can't take a joke, then you shouldn't dish it out. You jumped my ass about the martial art muslim school even though your own son practices Sambo, another form derived from traditionaly taught muslim wrestling in the former soviet union. You continue to make all kinds of derogitory remarks that are insulting, that in itself isn't a problem but you continue not to make a vaild point with them and that just gets well....old. If you're going to continue to toss out garbage, that can't stand on its own , then don't get your thin nose out of joint or your lilly white skin all red cause you're excited when you get some of it back. Have a coke and a smile and chill. Or, go ahead and have that other heart attack. You know, the one where you see your grandkids runnin around all zebra lookin n shit? I'm just as happy to shake your hand as to bitch slap your ass. Your play. Can ya let that hate go? I didn't think so either.....

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 05:32 PM (Cxxtv)

45 Is funny thought. See he has eliminated the possibility of hurting his feelings by calling him gay. Hell is is gay. Sort of like idiots calling me racist to hurt my feelings. Hell, I am a racist. Racists aren't born they're made. I wonder if the same is true for gays? Like some girl stole his lunch when he was in grade school and then beat him up. Or is it the other way around? Gays are born not made.

Something tells me he won't get off that easy. A moniker change would possibly gain him a little respect. But to each his own.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 05:35 PM (W7E9s)

46 wb: If you wasn't such a smartassed racist black to being with you would know that the Zebra phase came from the Jeffersons. Alright for the blacks to use it but not the whites? Typical black response. I can call you names but you're a racist if you call me names. Bitch slap my ass? Doubt it. I love what I get to do when someone in stupid enough to try.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 05:47 PM (W7E9s)

47 Just noticed. My skin is lily white. Looks neat, clean, nice. It represents civilization. Damn I'm proud of that lily white skin. Whoops, I see a dark spot. Better go wash it off before it stains.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 06:10 PM (W7E9s)

Okay.... you're going to quote the jefferson's to me? A spin off about a racsit who was a neighbor on another racists show? See this what I mean about it not going anywhere. I said in an old post that I thought it was kind of funny. Rooster, I don't give a rats butt one way or the other, you have every right to be as dumb as you want about race and I have that same right to laugh with or.. at you. Just try not to misquote me, if you would be so kind. Racism does not discriminate Rooster. Try reverse discrimination.

I said shake your hand or bitch slap. In other words, just as happy to get along as to kick your ass. Now, in this forum, it's all about words. It's too bad that people can't meet in the real world and share ideas about cultural things too. But, if we ever really for truesies get to play, you might want to check out some of the goodies that are out there in the playground that sambo is a very, very small part of, first. Is it that you just can't stand someone who's as black as the ace of spades has the same core values that you do about our country? Good God man, you might be wrong about things and if you base your lifes outlook on division, that's got to be pretty damn scary.

Have a Boddingtons and a wing on me, my brother.....

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 06:13 PM (Cxxtv)

49 wb,

you're actually offended by anything rooster and improbulus say? LOL. You need to lighten up. My only concern about them is that they might make this blog look bad, but there isn't anything they say that could offend me. They're racists. I just leave it at that.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 06:21 PM (8e/V4)

50 No, I'm not offended Carlos, I just want to get a point across and then have some fun with it. Ya see, growing up a poor black share croppers child in southern Mississippi back in the day, we'uns didn' have no way of talkin to white folk cepts when they drove by in dey big ole fancy cars yellin at us an' shit. Ah ahlways said if'n I wuz ever able to gets to talks to one o dem white folks, I wuz goin to give them a good ear fillin'. Grey Rooster happens to have a great deal of ear fillin that needs to be happening as nature abhors such an immense vacume. ( That was a small tweak rooster, but still a playful one) On another note, did you see either of those 2 movies I mentioned and if so, did you get the parallel of islam and the West?

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 06:33 PM (Cxxtv)

51 To you be your Way, and to me mine. (The Noble Quran, 109:1-6)

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 14, 2007 06:34 PM (Zm5ve)

52 Conan the Barbarian was before muslims. But as you say. You can be as dumb as you wish. And ah, for the good ole days. Was that before the word uppity was coined? Ha, ha.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 06:51 PM (W7E9s)

53 No, Mel Brooks came out with it Blazing Saddles. Were you in that movie, as Rooster Johnson?

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 06:54 PM (Cxxtv)

54 As I type this I'm watching the movie Glory. They are charging up the hill now. Suckas.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 06:54 PM (W7E9s)

55 Blazing saddles. I remember that movie. That was when you had to have one in it or the NAACP would burn your car and steal your TV.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 06:58 PM (W7E9s)

56 Conan was a Samaritan. The snake people were a cult that resembeled islam with blind obediance and a willingness to kill themselves at the bequest of the spiritual leader. This cult over ran all the lands until it was destroyed by having the leadres head cut off. That's what I meant in comparrison to the thread. The Gonad the Conehead was a fem dom low bugdet. ( That was 3) Sorry, I couldn't resist, just like a ripe watermelon need to be thumped, you do understand don't you rooster old boy?

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 07:01 PM (Cxxtv)

57 Amazing! The geryrooster/wb threadjack comes back into line. Glory is another good example of the heroic sacrifice theme.

Of course, anybody who would follow Ferris Bueller into combat really has no business being emancipated...

Posted by: wooga at March 14, 2007 07:03 PM (t9sT5)

58 Ferris Bueller WAS an emancipator! Didn't you see the movie? Who was free at the end of the movie, that was oppressed and trapped at the beggining of it? You can laugh, but I have a point.
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 14, 2007 07:13 PM (2OHpj)

59 Said that right wooga. wb: Strange that you bring up watermelons. Thought you guys gave them up for crack.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 07:16 PM (W7E9s)

60 Glory an example of heroic sacrifice. Yup! Them confederates were heroic in their defense of their fort against the yankee lackys.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 07:20 PM (W7E9s)

61 Yes Woogi, wonders never cease. I'll just wait until Rooster figures out what I said about him in the Conehead movie, it might be a bit, but he'll catch on. At least the guy knows his stuff about Target.He got to correct me about it not being french owned. Seems it was just a rumor ( started by the french) It's what I get for watching oprah and drinking t bird on hot afternoons on Elmer's Island.

Do you think we might be able to just get your old girlfriend to lift her blouse and remind the troops what they are really fighting for? Nothing raises moral better! Now that might be a good flick too.

Any thoughts on the Lord of the Rings series being the same anti islam theme? Great fight scenes that remind me of the trailers of 300.

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 07:40 PM (Cxxtv)

As for racism, I find no use for it. I don't like it when rcist arguements are used to attack, or injure me, and I don't like it when they are used to attack others. The reason I seldom comment about Rosster's position is that he often makes the excellent point that much of today's racism comes from "Black" organizations looking for a political advantage by pushing for more white guilt. They want to be paid off for slavery they didn't suffer under. CUTE!

I'd like to have them send me the blood money necessary to repay the cost in lives, that was paid by a whole lot of "white" people, to free the people who actually were slaves.

The slaves America freed at the cost of many hundreds of thousands of "white" lives are people decended from other people who got rounded up by thier own 'African' neighbors! They were sold at the coastline, to Muslim, and European traders. The "black" people who sold "black" people to "brown" people, and "white" people, when they didn't just keep them to be slaves for other "black" people. So it's a world of wolves! If anyone gets repairations paid for "white" crimes, I seek repairations for "white" lives lost fixing everyones mistakes, and freeing people.

wb and Greyrooster I both like. It's to bad that the ugliness of people in the past, of every "color" has to polute the dialogue of two people who agree more often than not, about the really big issues of the day.

When I was into Norse religion, someone made a racist attack against the "white supremecists" in the religion. The reply was basically, that Odin doesn't care if a man is black, white, or blue, as long as he acts like a man. Further, Odin doesn't need worship, because he is a God. What makes you think he requires your mortal validation? He has better things to worry about. We mortals also have better things to worry about then "color" of skin. Some things are really bigger than how dark your permanent tan is!

Unless someone makes thier race an issue, I say leave it off the table.

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 14, 2007 07:42 PM (2OHpj)

63 Problem is that wb will sooner or later tell you that Odin had nappy hair.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 07:45 PM (W7E9s)

64 "Lord of the Rings" Yes, it is no accident that the heroic imagery of Europe, which Tolkien tapped into, has evil men attacking from the far east, and hot south, serving the will of thier false god, and enslaving all who they conquer. It's no acident that blind devotion to a God who promises plunder, is associated with the forces of evil in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Art becomes proganda, when a truth inside the art, becomes a relevant political message to the one recieving it. USA, and the West, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 14, 2007 07:48 PM (2OHpj)

65 GRooster
No dumbshit, that was Ogden his poodle.... don't you know anything?

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 07:51 PM (Cxxtv)

66 greyrooster, if he does, neither Odin, nor I will be overly concerned. I might try to help his point of view, just out of a sense of historical correctness. I judge comments without regard to the "color" of the commenter, because here we are colorless. If we never brought color into this forum, it would never affect our logical arguements. We could stick to making valid points without irrelevant bigotry. Anyway thats my opinion.
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 14, 2007 07:53 PM (2OHpj)

67 We're on the same page with race Professor, I think I've made that point abudantly clear. Not a popular position at times but if the truth hurts, then it needs to. In deed, it is the cornerstone of my belief that it is an absolute that we all call ourselves Americans first. I know it sounds like Forset Gump but damnit, Gump was pretty damn smart. He kept things simple. Thank you for your reply.

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 07:57 PM (Cxxtv)

68 wb, always a pleasure

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 14, 2007 07:58 PM (2OHpj)

The pleasure has been all mine, good Professor.

Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 08:23 PM (Cxxtv)

70 grey rooster, its so sad to see you hate on your own peoples. im sorry you hate your black skin so much that you have to pretend to be white and a black hater online. and im sorry your house got flooded by Katrina too, but you dont need to hate on your own peoples. its not their fault.

please stop it. love your african heritage and swarthy skin, greyrooster.

you dont see me dissing america do you?

Posted by: salaam alaykoom at March 14, 2007 08:59 PM (SdWFu)

71 love your african heritage and swarthy skin, greyrooster.

LOL.

The classic line of the day.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2007 09:18 PM (8e/V4)

72 Salaam. I believe you muslim dogs need to address your africa heritage not us Nordics. You are the guys with the half black complextions and half nappy hair. You are also a liar when you say I hate. Most muslims are liars so that doesn't offer anything new. Dissing America? Another of your lies. Now back to you backward camel humping society. You savages are not evolved enough to attempt conversation with you betters. If I were Black I would love it. But if I was muslim trash I would hate my parents for making me one of the ugliest people in the world.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 15, 2007 09:19 AM (tipQ2)

73 Oh, I'm hurt. I guess I should capitulate to your greatness. Fucking loser.

Wow...the surrender reflex is really ingrained in you dress wearing Nancys.

Posted by: Randman at March 15, 2007 09:35 AM (Sal3J)

74 That is progress I suppose............

Posted by: wb at March 15, 2007 10:15 AM (x8U0u)

75 Wow...the surrender reflex is really ingrained in you dress wearing Nancys.

oooohhhh... you're soooo witty!! I'm impressed with your incredible perception! Your name should be "Percepto, the perceptive". You must have all the ladies fawning at your feet. I wish I could be like you, then I could be happy with my head stuck in my ass. I'm truly happy now, as I've finally found someone stupider than me. Thanks Rankman!

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 15, 2007 11:50 AM (BEwX/)

Hey, It's fine if your gay. I don't care. And wb, ignore the fucking racist Rooster. He's an ignorant southerner.

I imagine he's a fat man with a beard.

Posted by: Donald Miller at March 15, 2007 06:10 PM (TmLg9)

77 Greyrooster's house was flooded? Aw, man why didn't the racist die?

And Michael, you can like rooster but I despise racists. If Maximus, Bargholz and Rooster were beheaded, I wouldn't care.

Just like when the dumb rooster calls Spanish people Jorje. It's spelled Jorge you dumb racist. You make southerners look like white trash.

Bald, fat bearded dumb ass.

And Gaycocklover, I've seen outspoken gay people before but you are definitely something new.

Posted by: John Dork at March 15, 2007 06:17 PM (TmLg9)

78 GayCockLover in his own words ... "I could be happy with my head stuck in my ass. I'm truly happy now"
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 15, 2007 06:25 PM (2OHpj)

79 Dear Donald Miller,
I'll pick and choose with whom I might care to trade barbs with, thank you very much. For the record.... I am a fat old man with a beard and bushy nose and ear hair that drinks too much. I just happen to be of different pigment and..... I live farther south than probably all of you. In a trailer, with a broken down 4rd pinto in the front. Now how bout sending your daughter on down to me? If you want to blast the rooster, don't shoot yourself in the foot to do it and don't pull me into your bullshit as I can start my own battles where and when I so choose. You see, I may be ignorant but I just happen to live in the south, it's not a requirement anywhere. But thank you any way, WB.

Posted by: wb at March 15, 2007 07:12 PM (2g5nL)

John Dork, as long as your for this country, and not against it, you go right on hating whoever you like.

For my part, I feel our situation is bad enough that warts like racism may not be as bg a concern as cancers like Jihad. I do not approve of racism. I do not approve of casual abortion. I do not aprove of teaching creationism as science, but I do approve of teaching it as a philosphy relating to science.

Except for the fact that I do equate abortion to the taking of human life, the rest of these things are warts. They are ugly, but they won't kill us. Cancer will kill us! Islam, traditional, fundamental, or radical, will kill us.

If greyrooster wants to argue with wb, it doesn't change that I like them both. it doesn't change the fact I'd trust either of them to watch my back against the greater enemy we all face. I'd expect them to stand side by side against that same enemy, even as they cussed each other out! In America we are suppossed to accept some differences, as long as in the end, when the line is drawn, we are Americans.

The people you despise, are Americans before anything else. I may find fault with things they argue for, but I do accept them as genuinely devoted to the nation, and it's well being.

If you John Dork are willing to put the USA before it's warts, and fight the existential foe, you and I are allies, even if we quibble about details. I welcome assholes of all kinds to come fight for his nation, against our imperialist enemy. We can all get drunk and fight about our little problems after we defeat the big one together.

I hope that clarifies things a bit.

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 15, 2007 07:33 PM (2OHpj)

81 warts? that's a rather unseemly anatomical comparative reference, much nicer than some of the other ones I've been compared to however.... so I suppose warts it is. Perhaps WB can now stand for "Wart Bush" Rather than Winn......oops TMI!

Posted by: wb at March 15, 2007 07:41 PM (2g5nL)

82 John Dork: Good name suits you fine you cowardly kiss assing wigger.

Ignore those stupid northerners. They are so inbred with everything ugly and nasty they don't know their betters. And please don't send your daughter down here even the white boys will start hooting "here piggy, piggy. Put them yankee sows on the grill where they belong. An those sows from up nonth don't have to be female. The males squeal louder.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 15, 2007 08:36 PM (pVVSX)

83 Thanks Rankman!

No problem cum gurgler. Its easy to own little fagots like you. Squeal some more biatch.

Posted by: Randman at March 15, 2007 08:37 PM (Sal3J)

84 That's two "g's" randman, TWO "g's" As in "that's enough to spook the faGGots off a butt wagon". The devil made me say this, but I was gonna anyway. Off to rehab for ya lad. Heh, if I can room with A.C. I'd go in a heart-beat.

Posted by: Skul at March 15, 2007 09:21 PM (MQ3sn)

85 I still want my money for bringing them over here. They never payed. I expect payment with interest for their food and board while crossing the Atlatic on the firest cruise ships in the the world. They haven't paid a dime and uncle muamam back home in africa said we would get paid. Times up, pay up.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 15, 2007 09:54 PM (pVVSX)

For the record, another name for Arthur, King of the Britons, is "Wart", so put that in your pipe

I do believe in diversity, but not the leftist strangling kind. If we all disagree among each other as family, fine. But when an imperial enemy is sneaking across our border, its time to stop bitching about who did the dishes last, and pass out the kitchen tools! Work your way to the gun cabinet, and trade up. Get rid of the bandits in the night. The go back to fighting over the remote.

As I said once before, if I could aim Michael Moore in the right direction, I'd put him to work on my team. I'd even consider forgiving him. I think everyone knows I hate Michael Moore. By comparison most the lefties here are pretty nice guys. I don't think most of them consciously lie, like we know Michael Moore does.

After 9-11, there isn't much I won't do to our enemies, if it will stop them. There are few I wouldn't work with, if I knew it would hurt our enemies. We are at war. We can't be squeamish. Racists and Blacks fought against the Nazi's during WW2, so I see no reason they can't fight today's fascists together also.

If anyone here is a wart, it's me. I'm still cleaning up my life after all these years. Being an 'asshole' was a badge of honor in my old, old crowd, so I'm not going to casually condemn anyone who is at least OK. I'll happily blast our common enemy with Ann Coulter and anyone else who is at least swinging in the right direction.

So it comes down to "United We Stand!" Warts, assholes, and whatever. We are still better than those we fight against. And what we fight for is better than the sum of it's parts. So here we stand warts and all!

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 15, 2007 10:32 PM (2OHpj)

87 "Maximus, Bargholz and Rooster were beheaded, I wouldn't care" I don't think that is true. You'd have to be pretty inhuman. I doubt your making that claim. You don't like them, but I dare you to say you really meant the 'beheading' remark!
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 15, 2007 10:34 PM (2OHpj)

88 "racists and blacks"..... did you mean people of different colors good Professor? Don't discriminate racsism lest you open a swath of moles and raised freckles upon wartism!

Posted by: wb at March 15, 2007 11:09 PM (2g5nL)

89 No problem cum gurgler. Its easy to own little fagots like you. Squeal some more biatch.

You sure know how to make a guy blush Stankman. I wish I could meet you.. I'm sure we'd have a gay-old time. You sound so tough, I just know you'd show me what a real man is. Come on out of the closet and join me in some Bohemian fun, just like your glorious leader.
Squeal! Squeal!.. I suck Randman's cock, cause I'm his bitch! Squeal! Squeal!

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 15, 2007 11:23 PM (l0dHt)

90 Wow...could you excel in the yawn department. That boring shit may kill
them in your truther circle jerk but it is real tired material...yet
you keep coming back in a pathetic attempt to achieve what is obviously
beyond you....to be clever. Its really funny to watch your juvenile
attempts to endlessly bait. Yawn, yawn, yawn...please talk about my
cock some more amateur. The one thing you did get right is that you are my bitch. I knight you the Ned Beatty of the Jawa river.

Posted by: Randman at March 16, 2007 12:16 AM (Sal3J)

91 I haven't seen 300 yet, but have both read and watched LOTR. IIRC, the original "analysis" of it was that it was a metaphor for WWII, and had nothing to do with the Saracens. However, Tolkien himself basically said it was just a good story and had was not a metaphor for anything. IIRC.

Posted by: irish19 at March 16, 2007 12:26 AM (Cecpt)

92 irish19 yes, your absolutely right. For my own part, I was pointing out that the material Tolkien drew upon was European legend, and folklore, and midieval culture. Some of the folklore he used would have had the struggles with Islam, wound up in it. The Song of Roland for example. Compare to Boromir's death scene. Charles Martel could compare to Aragorn. There is plenty more, and it suffuses Classic European culture. Intended or not, Tolkien captures some of this in his tale. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 16, 2007 12:58 AM (2OHpj)

93 "did you mean people of different colors good Professor?" Why yes, I did, but I slipped into the false generalizations we find all over the place, and that was an error on my part. Thanks for noting it.
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 16, 2007 01:00 AM (2OHpj)

94 I'll leave you to your own analysis on that one. You're certainly smart enough to figure it out. Contex usage like that may be an inadvertant mistake, but it comes from something that is real. I don't mean it as a correction, just an observation. Take it for what it's worth, just more of my trivial blather polluting cyber space.

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 08:34 AM (tclwJ)

95 WB, I don't have a daugher you idiot. I'm 19. Thanks for being ungrateful. And yes Michael, I love the U.S.A. U.S all the way. Your first name is my middle name. My username is not my real name.

And John Dork, LOL, you really know how to ruin Bargholz's plans. He called you John Dork and the name sticks. LOL.

Posted by: Donald Miller at March 16, 2007 08:52 AM (TmLg9)

96 Well Donald, I hate to be the one to break this to you but.... if puberty hasn't kicked in by 19, you may need hormone therapy. It would also explain why you're playing on daddies computer instead of getting laid. And as for gratitude, you little dipshit, read my post again and you'll see that I told you thank you very much for keeping your fucking punk ass nose out of my concerns when it comes to dealing with others. But since you're such a dumb little nutless fuck, how's this for plain english, Hey highschool shower bitch, eat shit and die, I don't need a snot nosed twerp telling me what to do. I hope that clears thing up for you and puts it in a better light for you to understand, if you still aren't sure get back with me and I'll do the best I can to help.

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 09:34 AM (tclwJ)

97 Wow...could you excel in the yawn department. That boring shit may kill
them in your truther circle jerk but it is real tired material...yet
you keep coming back in a pathetic attempt to achieve what is obviously
beyond you....to be clever. Its really funny to watch your juvenile
attempts to endlessly bait. Yawn, yawn, yawn...please talk about my
cock some more amateur.

You keep responding to my tired, *YAWN* material, so my baiting must be working. I may be an idiot, but you're definitely retarded for responding to me, especially since you're no amateur... And I'm your bitch?

The one thing you did get right is that you are my bitch.
You've proven that, Tough Guy.

I knight you the Ned Beatty of the Jawa river.
Thanks for the complement! I knight you Corky of the Jawa river, because you can ride the bus.

Posted by: GayCockLover at March 16, 2007 11:22 AM (l0dHt)

98 LOL, whatever wb. You fat ass southerner.

Posted by: Donald Miller at March 16, 2007 03:28 PM (TmLg9)

99 Ignore the fucking ungrateful fat ass nigger donlad. He's just upset because his wife is sucking a white man's dick. Once you go white, you never go back.

Learn to fight someone your own age, you fucking nigger. Why don't you go eat soem watermelons.

Jesus christ, you are such a fucking ungrateful fat ass.

What's the matter. Your wife likes being buttfucked by crackers.

I hope your children get raped in the ass.

They'll be screaming "help me daddy. OOH yeah, help me!"" Give it to me. give it to me".

Then thir eyes will be gouged out and their dicks will be sucked.

Posted by: John Doe at March 16, 2007 03:31 PM (TmLg9)

100

You fucking fat ass nigger. What's the matter. You didn't like it when your parents were lynched.

You didn't like it when your wife was raped repeatedly by white men who stuck their dick in her mouth?

You didn't like it when your children were forced to suck dick too?

You didn't like it when their corpses were burned?

Posted by: John Doe at March 16, 2007 03:34 PM (TmLg9)

101

Wow, well I'm not a racist but I sure as Hell don't like that piece of shit called wb. Lay off the chicken fatty. I wouldn't like seeing your fat ass walk down the street.

That's what you get for being nice Donald.

Posted by: Max Power at March 16, 2007 03:45 PM (TmLg9)

102 That's much better Donald. Just keeping it real. WB

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 04:00 PM (tclwJ)

103 Now see, Max doesn't like me. That's fine, but does that make him a racist? Not necessarily. But note that he felt compelled to clarify in his post right off with the statement that he is not rasist. Now why would he feel as though he had to state that he was not a racist first? Well that's a good question to ask Max. Max.... why did you feel the need to state that you are not a racist before trying to insult me? If I were someone that Max thought to be the same color as he, then would he start the sentence off the same way? You see, we live in a society where everyone is afraid of being labled something. That means that we are less than truthful with ourselves and each other. I don't care if Max is a racist, but I do care when Max is a racist but claims that he's not. As a society we all evolve, either in a way that makes it a better, more productive place or the opposite and our social structure implodes. Max will never be able to address and resolve, should he ever choose to,
this deficit in his character. People will never be able to come to terms with themselves and for that matter each other as long as they are in denial as to who and what they are about. There comes a point where bad behavior is just simply that, bad behaivor. I don't resent Max for disliking me, I don't think he's less than deserving of common decency but I do know that until Max owns up to his ignorance, he will never grow as a person and that takes some very destructive forms in our world. This islamic onslaught is a good example of what happens when people don't question the equality they seek to deny others. There are some who clammer for reperations and those, such as myself, who simpily want to be treated the same way as anyone else when they take equal responsibility for the equal rights to which we as Americans are all entitled. So with that being said, let me close with... fuck you max, the better part of you dripped down your mamas leg. Cheers!

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 04:47 PM (tclwJ)

104 LOL, sorry WB, but I'm not into men. Cheers!

Posted by: Max Power at March 16, 2007 05:02 PM (TmLg9)

105 Maybe one day you'll be in to being one

Posted by: wb at March 16, 2007 05:06 PM (tclwJ)

106 you skated on that other post max, but I've got your ass pegged.

Posted by: wb at March 17, 2007 10:23 PM (s6CsG)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 13, 2007

My Review Of "The 300"

Damn fine movie, damn fine.

I'll be seeing it again, in the theater, and that's saying something. 99% of the movies I watch, I wait for the DVD.

I won't debate the historical accuracy at all. It's a movie based on a graphic novel. Period. It's not a film adaptation of the works of Herodotus.

I give it two thumbs and a big toe up.

Rumor has it Rusty saw it today as well, and came away with the same opinion.

Posted by: Vinnie at 08:50 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I agree - damn fine film. I actually stood up and appauded during a couple of scenes.

And the fact that the liberals hate it and Iran is condemning it doesn't hurt.

Posted by: Timothy S. Carlson at March 13, 2007 10:01 PM (uBBUD)

2 really? iran condemns it? weird.

also. the ONLY thing i dont like about that movie is that it made the spartans look kinda.... stupid. the victory was far more intelligently strategical than this movie makes it out. but yeah, historical accuracy and whatnot. i just think they could have made this movie about any random battle and it would have done just as good.

Posted by: Jake at March 13, 2007 10:39 PM (AeRA2)

3 Jake, any examples you would like to make? Which random battles do you think were of similar importance to the flow of history? USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 13, 2007 11:13 PM (2OHpj)

4 The Spartan Senate, not King Leonidis and his 'army', looks stupid in this movie - because they (and the 'wise ones', what ever they were called) were bought off by the persians. Turning on their own people for gold - sounds like Murtha and the rest of the dhimicrats, huh?

Yes, they could have made this about any battle, but the creators chose this battle, which has significance to our current situation in the world. Did they chose it specifically as a comment to that affect? I don't know, but timing is everything.

For all of the faults that will be found with this film, I think it will remain popular with the American people for the allegory it poses.

THOMPSON 2008 - A Tough Man For Tough Times

Posted by: Timothy S. Carlson at March 13, 2007 11:21 PM (uBBUD)

5 how about the crusades? or waggle to the feminists with joan of arc (being topless or something, of course) how about Genghis Khan's successful uniting of his people and training them as an incredibly powerful army? or some of the fairly interesting japanese wars (had a damn lot for all living on three smallish islands) the Vikings successful campaign against the romans in britain and northern europe?

what i mean is you could just do it up with some brutal cgi and some dramatization and it would totally work. im kinda sick of hearing about ancient roman/greek civilizations, like the were the ONLY things to have existed then. >_>

you realize that i am not posting some sort of crazy liberal contradictory view, right? i like war movies and i like cgi. i just don't like rehashed ideas. theres lots of interesting graphic novel concepts that aren't even touched. we dont need to do another troy/gladiator/etc movie.

Posted by: Jake at March 13, 2007 11:34 PM (AeRA2)

6 how about the crusades?

Kingdom of Heaven.

or waggle to the feminists with joan of arc (being topless or something, of course)

Other than wiggling titties around, what would be the point of that one?

how about Genghis Khan's successful uniting of his people and training them as an incredibly powerful army?

Let's not forget the fact that they rampaged over the entire region, snuffing out entire peoples. I'm thinking that isn't a good equivalent for 300 and its message.

And the fact they wiped out entire peoples in their path?
or some of the fairly interesting japanese wars (had a damn lot for all
living on three smallish islands)

The Last Samurai.

the Vikings successful campaign
against the romans in britain and northern europe?

That would be an interesting one, seeing as how the Vikings didn't exist during the time of the Romans. They were a distinct pagan Scandinavian culture that developed, I believe, around the eighth century AD. So unless zombie Caesar and his undead legions were to spring out of the ground to fight them, I don't see it happening.

what i mean is you could just do it up with some brutal cgi and some dramatization and it would totally work.

I don't know if you've actually looked, but brutal violence and great CG does not a great movie make. If that were the case, Sin City would have made a lot more at the box office.

im kinda sick of hearing about ancient roman/greek civilizations, like the were the ONLY things to have existed then. >_>

Fair enough, but previous to Gladiator, which really kicked off the whole Grecco-Roman schtick in Hollywood, there hadn't been a memorable one made in decades. So, in seven years, you can count four movies made: Gladiator, Troy, Alexander, 300, and you could probably HBO's Rome series. Not really much of a glut by Hollywood standards.

you realize that i am not posting some sort of crazy liberal
contradictory view, right? i like war movies and i like cgi. i just
don't like rehashed ideas.

Let's consider this:

1. Gladiator: Telling the story a fictional general turned gladiator and his conflict against the corrupt and psychotic emperor of Rome, embodied in gladiatorial combat.

2. Troy: Recounting the Trojan War and the victory of the Greeks over Troy with their final deception.

3. Alexander: Recounting the life of Alexander the Great and his rise and fall.

4. 300: Telling a highly stylized account of the a long-odds battle of elite troops against an army of staggering size.

Those all sound like rehashed ideas to me...

theres lots of interesting graphic novel concepts that aren't even touched.

And against the backdrop of all the other superhero movies that were/are being made, wouldn't 300 fall into that category?

we dont need to do another troy/gladiator/etc movie.

As I believe I showed above, those are far from the same movie, unless you want to reduce them all the generalities. It seems to me that you've totally missed the point of the movie. Are all those other examples interesting? Sure. But all the ones you cited, save the Crusades, have neither the cultural or historical resonance to match the battle of Thermopylae. And can you cite one where a single battle was so pivotal or the odds so long (even by actual historical estimation)? All of those are interesting periods of history, but they aren't specific battles with great resonance that can be told in a two hour movie.

Posted by: David Marcoe at March 14, 2007 12:34 AM (/NV5+)

7
That would be an interesting one, seeing as how the Vikings didn't
exist during the time of the Romans. They were a distinct pagan
Scandinavian culture that developed, I believe, around the eighth
century AD. So unless zombie Caesar and his undead legions were to
spring out of the ground to fight them, I don't see it happening.

:p anglo-saxons then.

Posted by: JOHN RYAN at March 14, 2007 12:40 AM (AeRA2)

Well I happen to like the movies (old) about Ghengis Khan, so a new one would be cool I guess.

Yes "viking" culture was later than the single 'Roman' empire. The Northmen were getting around before that, but not strictly 'viking' which is more descriptive of the activities we associate with that word, including 'pillage'. I have read that some Northmen came down in time to help Charles Martel repel another epic invasion we should all know about. Thats a movie I'd like to see made.

I still think there is a special message in 'The 300' and that it is something from the artist in Frank Miller, striking a contrast between a war to defend, and a war to subjugate. As a rule, America isn't the one who starts wars. We aren't perfect, but our isolationist streak is a fairly strong one, even today.

If you look at how we are with even deadly enemies like Nazism, you can see we like to mind our own business as a people. We react badly when messed with. That's about it.

We are defenders. We defend the enviroment of western enlightenment. We have made a commitment to do so, even if we don't always feel like it. We could have forced the world to our mold, but at the price of some of the values we hold dear. So we wait, instead, and pray we see threats before they become to great.

Our enemy is a conquerer. Our enemy will infiltrate and corrupt us, or mass up and murder us outright, but the enemies goal remains the same despite whatever tactic is selected. Our submission is the goal. Especially OUR submission. When we are in submission, the world will fall along with us. We are the 'Spartans'.

The fact that freedom for this world, lives or dies with US, is an absolute. It is a pure truth. Someday, it may be that if we guard this responsability well, we can pass it on to a successor nation which shares our ideals, and will guard them as we have. That day is a long ways away, and will never come, if we fail in this dark time.

So without the benefit of special effects, or a cool soundtrack, here we are at the wall. Americans, at least some of us, with our allies. Aware of the true enemy, and knowing it is up to each of us to make our best effort, to do what needs done, and defend what needs defending!

Frank Miller is going on my list of everyday hero's. His pen is mighty indeed! He uses it for the good.

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 14, 2007 03:09 AM (2OHpj)

9 :p anglo-saxons then.

The British Isles were populated by groups like the Irish, Picti, Scotti, Attacoti, etc. Collectively, they were known as Celts. The Saxons and the Angles came later. Try this link for more info.

Posted by: David Marcoe at March 14, 2007 03:11 AM (/NV5+)

10 AND ITS NOT A LIBERAL REVIONISTS MOVIE, LIKE DANCES WITH WOLVES WAS.

Posted by: sandpiper at March 14, 2007 11:02 AM (ILvmZ)

11 I still think there is a special message in 'The 300' and that it is
something from the artist in Frank Miller, striking a contrast between
a war to defend, and a war to subjugate.

I agree. I am going to see 300 this weekend, but the appeal of the story is that a small group of men are defending freedom against overwhelming odds, knowing full well that they will never live to see that freedom themselves.

It hits the same notes as the final battle of Saving Private Ryan, the "many days" speech from Braveheart, the Alamo, the St. Crispin's day speech from Henry V, the Magnificent Seven, and on and on. It doesn't even matter if the story is 100% fictional. It still is hitting the central theme that some men, better than us, are willing to sacrifice themselves so that we may be free.

Of course, lefturds see America as an evil oppressor, and so somehow the likes of Zarqawi are "freedom fighters" on the same moral level as the 300. The 300 specifically argues that the Spartan civilization, compared to the Persians, was better and the only one worth dying for. May not be historically accurate, but voicing the very notion that some cultures are better than others is the greatest sin imaginable to lefturds.

Victor David Hanson explained it better (this isn't his review, but a short commentary on the point I raised):
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzJmOTNmYmNlYjNmMDIyZjNmMWRjOGExOGNjYzBjMzU=

Posted by: wooga at March 14, 2007 01:19 PM (t9sT5)

Wooga, since nobody else said so yet, your link was great! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 15, 2007 07:04 PM (2OHpj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 10, 2007

Derka Allah Mohammed Jihad

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:34 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.

March 09, 2007

Video: Leia's Birthday Goes Terribly Wrong

Is Princess Leia really a long-lost relative of Paris Hilton? You be the judge. Warning: Peppered with the f-bomb.

Thanks to Shawn. Video below -->> more...

Posted by: Rusty at 08:09 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.

March 08, 2007

The Enterprise Takes on the Empire

The Enterprise taking out the Executor? As if...

Posted by: Ragnar at 10:17 AM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.

March 07, 2007

Iowahawk : Let's Tone Down the Rhetoric

As usual, Iowahawk delivers the goods:

BILL [MAHER]: That's right Ann, you anorexic Nazi whore. Even though we are on opposite sides of the political fence we can both agree that Americans of all political stripes need to start walking back from the hateful rhetoric that unfortunately characterizes much of our contemporary political discussion.
ANN [COULTER]: I couldn't agree more Bill, you syphillitic commie scumnozzle. Because whether they are normal patriotic Americans or mincing San Francisco fudgepackers, all citizens of this country need to think first before using words intended to hurt or offend others.

It gets better.

Posted by: Ragnar at 04:20 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.

March 06, 2007

Meet Bill Clinton's Mistress: Belinda Stronach

Apparently tongues were wagging in both the British tabloids and in the Great White North that Bill Clinton was getting a little action from Canadian Liberal MP, Belinda Stronach---and nobody bothered to tell me! Shame on you.

Stronach is one of the wealthiest businesswomen in Canada and, apparently, has a nack for sleeping with the rich and or the famous. This includes a couple of hockey players and a former Conservative MP.

Stronach herself was a Conservative but jumped ship, dumped her Conservative MP, and last year she' was rumored to be doing the Lewinsky act on Bill Clinton. Let's hope she's washing those dresses!

And, to be honest, she's not half bad looking--especially by Bubba's standards. For once Clinton shows a bit of taste if not any class.

The First Post:

The tabloids cut to the chase: they called her the "blonde bombshell" or "Bubba's blonde."
Bubba, of course, is Bill Clinton. He has been photographed with Stronach several times. The sightings seem to be getting more frequent, leading to press speculation that their relationship has moved beyond official "friendship" - the description used by Stronach's PR people - to true romance.

The money quote from the article:

"Bill was always more interested in her money than her breasts."

That's a first! Anyway, this may be old news to most, but the article just came up in my gmail, and it's a first to me.....and oh so predictably funny!

UPDATE: Since some of you can't read, let me clarify--this is old news, and I'm pissed that no one e-mailed me this. And you call yourselves friends.......

oops, I just realized I used the present tense in a few sentences. My bad.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:20 PM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 286 words, total size 2 kb.

March 05, 2007

Atari: Pigs in Space

Possibly the greatest video ever posted at the Jawa Report. Ever. It's got pigs. It's got space. It's got Star Wars. It's got Atari. What more could you possibly want?

Via Imperial Minister-of-all-things-Kylie-Minogue's-fantastic-backside, Flea. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 03:48 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.

Is Ann Coulter a F*g?

Apparently Ann Coulter called John Edwards a "f*ggot" or something.

What's wrong with this thing? Let me try typing that again. Ahem....

Apparently Ann Coulter called John Edwards a "f*ggot" or.....

What the? One more time.

Apparently Ann Coulter called John Edwards a "f*g"......

How come every time I try to type the word "f*ggot" a little "*" star keeps appearing where the "a" should be? Oh. I get it. It's the censors. You see, as a straight man I can't say the word "f*g" or "f*ggot". more...

Posted by: Rusty at 01:54 PM | Comments (24) | Add Comment
Post contains 185 words, total size 1 kb.

1 It's the censors.

It's the Liberals.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 05, 2007 03:50 PM (8e/V4)

2 Besides, Iâ€™ve already purchased $200 worth of faggot offsets

LOL. Funny post over a Six meat buffet.

He's right, all the rightwingers falling all over each other to distance themselves from Ann Coulter should take a huge pill.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 05, 2007 03:58 PM (8e/V4)

3 Just don't question her patriotism

Posted by: JOHN RYAN at March 05, 2007 04:20 PM (TcoRJ)

4 She may not be a f*ggot, but she definitely is a c*nt.

Posted by: Jimmy the Dhimmi at March 05, 2007 04:40 PM (CI4Lt)

5 Well, F*gnar seems to think she's a b*tch!

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at March 05, 2007 04:43 PM (ZKng9)

6 I think we in a state of war, and nuetrals need to be won over. Ann sometimes drives the nuetrals away. She is still funny, and smart as all get out., but we need to get people on OUR side, not send them to the left. That's the issue to me. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 05, 2007 06:31 PM (2OHpj)

7 That's the issue to me.

Yes, that's the only issue that counts as far as I'm concerned. But does that make her a bitch and a cunt? (I know you haven't said that). Definitely not.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 05, 2007 06:53 PM (8e/V4)

8 I'm assuming the South Park clip is the "Hey, there, shitty shitty fag fag, shitty shitty fag fag how do you do?" one. I can't listen at work.

Posted by: wooga at March 05, 2007 07:07 PM (t9sT5)

9 BFD, Ann Coulter you go girl!

Edwards is a Lawyer. the only thing worser is Edwards is a Fag Lawyer. the only thing worser than that is Edwards is a Fag Muslim Lawyer.

Posted by: Rubin at March 05, 2007 09:57 PM (Px8Cf)

10 Sorry Professor, She's one of my favorites for saying what needs to be said. I'd like to see her in oval office and call the iranian leader a little bundle of sticks as well.
WB

Posted by: wb at March 05, 2007 10:44 PM (DOryG)

11 hee hee, its so nice to see people who normally agree with each other in little snits with one another.

Posted by: Jake at March 05, 2007 11:52 PM (AeRA2)

12 Wooga: Old buddy. Guess you feel warm and cuttlely right now. Next we'll hear the "what to you call 5000 lawyers on a sinking ship one". As for me. My attorney is my hero. Time after time, after time, after time.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 06, 2007 02:20 AM (criip)

13 For the record, Ann serves a very useful purpose. She breaks taboo's in PC speech and overcomes the subtle thought control of media bias quite often. I think it may have been a mistake for her to ease off, or this recent comment wouldn't have stuck out so much. However, Michelle Malkin is correct in noting that we are often caught in Coulters blast radius, and some times she hurts friend as well as foe. Also for the record, I'm still an Ann Coulter fan. Nobody is perfect! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 06, 2007 03:05 AM (2OHpj)

14 Hi Jake! Trying to be taken seriously again?

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 06, 2007 03:06 AM (2OHpj)

15 Jake, for the record, that's not an attempt to drive you off. Get a thicker skin, and stick around this time : ) USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 06, 2007 03:07 AM (2OHpj)

16 I've got a dog named Jake who gets into little snits with the cat. But they both eat out of the same bowl.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 06, 2007 03:17 AM (criip)

17 INFIDEL!!!!! Cat's and dogs may not eat from the same bowl!!!! Oh wait, that's black and white people...no....(flipping pages... hang on....) Aha! Catholics and Baptists!!! shit...no wait ...........Cowboys and Indians!!!!!!! DAMN IT! That's not it either.... look, I'll have to get back to you on this one.

Posted by: wb at March 06, 2007 08:56 AM (dFKOS)

18 hee hee, its so nice to see people who normally agree with each other in little snits with one another.

That's right, jake. That's the differenc between us and your groupthinking Leftard buddies.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 06, 2007 10:03 AM (8e/V4)

19 That's right, jake. That's the differenc between us and your groupthinking Leftard buddies.

Yep, the left is always in lock-step agreement with each other. Just look at the Democrats in Congress. 100% agreement, all the way, especially with the various war resolutions. Unlike the Republicans in Congress, who were so quarrelsome with each other and the White House Bush had to veto their legislation ... uh ... zero times. T

ime to start comparing your tired-out default positions to reality on the ground, JC.

Posted by: Gleep! at March 06, 2007 02:14 PM (Zlbra)

20 Time to start comparing your tired-out default positions to reality on the ground,

Likewise.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 06, 2007 02:18 PM (8e/V4)

21 Here it is!!!! Jesusland and Gleep may not drink at the same bowling alley! INFIDELS!!!!!

Posted by: wb at March 06, 2007 03:12 PM (dFKOS)

22 hee hee

i don't really care if you take me seriously... i sure don't take you very seriously...

Posted by: Jake at March 06, 2007 10:19 PM (AeRA2)

23 Damn glad about that.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 06, 2007 10:32 PM (wTIrf)

24 Buick Riviera http://www.volny.cz/buickriviera

Posted by: we at March 31, 2007 02:15 AM (Y7rL7)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 03, 2007

A Thousand Words And All That

stein hoist: Boazo at the lovely and talented SondraK's.

Related.

Posted by: Vinnie at 11:09 PM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.

March 02, 2007

Islam: Divorce by Text Message Okay! Celebrities flock to Dubai

Islam's highest cleric in the "moderate" state of Dubai issued a fatwa yesterday permitting the country's Muslim men to divorce their wives through text messaging. The Grand Mufti Ahmed al-Haddad, in a written statement, said that phone SMS messaging was no different than written declarations of divorce. He also declared that religious authorities could judge the divorce over a mobile phone.

Islamic law only requires that a husband repeat the phrase "I divorce you" three times for a marriage to end.

The Jawa Report suspects this is Dubai's latest attempt to attract wealthy, mistress laiden, foreigners to the country. Under Islamic law a man may have several wives. And under some interpretations of Islamic law (for Shias, especially) a man may have a "temporary wife".

We can see rich and drunken celebraties flocking to Dubai for quick polygomous marriages, and even quicker divorces! Alas, what is good for the goose is not good for the gander in Dubai. As Mike over at MEMRI notes, only the husband can drop the wife in this oh-so-convenient manner.

Sorry Britney Spears, Dubai is not the answer to your K-Fed problems. Because, as it turns out, K-Fed actually found out Britney was leaving him through a text message she sent.

But Bobby Brown might want to think about visiting the kingdom right about now.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:01 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Dr. S.,
Actually that really is the law of devorce in Islam.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 02, 2007 05:21 PM (vixLB)

2 I know. You thought the ENTIRE post was a joke? It isn't. Just the implications.

Posted by: Rusty at March 02, 2007 05:49 PM (JQjhA)

3 I must oppose Sharia. It's counter to what we are founded upon.
USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 02, 2007 06:28 PM (2OHpj)

4 Off topic , Avery? says 6 Billion given by US government to Global Warming 'researchers' last year. Still checking the source, and if anyone wants to help, I'd appreciate it. thanks. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 02, 2007 06:46 PM (2OHpj)

5 I guess that's dennis Avery, and author writing against Hysteria.

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 02, 2007 06:47 PM (2OHpj)

6 Yes,
Utterly barbaric isn't it?!
It's the very antithesis of civilization.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 02, 2007 07:18 PM (vixLB)

7 Islamopithecine countries give men unjust power over women.

America gives women unjust power over men.

Both systems suck.

Anybody here think having an irresponsible, sluttish, stupid and emotionally retarded woman like Britny Spears awarded custody of their kids is an enlightened attitude? That's the norm, not the aberration, folks.

Women cant even pick which shoes to wear when they leave the house, but they have undue power over men's live's in this neutered country. Women cant make up their minds on any given subject except self indulgence, but we let them make up our minds for us.

Even islam has at least one good point.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at March 03, 2007 01:17 AM (Dt3sl)

8 Heh. Several wives. My experience is that it's hard to get along with just one.

Posted by: Mike at March 03, 2007 12:57 PM (unQIx)

9 I don't know why, but I kind of like Britney. She's a fighter, and she's obviously struggling with her own demons, but she does not seem to be giving up...

Posted by: DemocracyRules at March 03, 2007 03:30 PM (L/SIz)

10 IdiocracyRules:

She's fighting against growing up--and losing.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at March 04, 2007 02:13 AM (Dt3sl)

11 Did I write losing? I meant winning.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at March 04, 2007 02:13 AM (Dt3sl)

12 I hear that they devorce their wives in the middle east by saying I DEVORCE YOU three times

Posted by: sandpiper at March 04, 2007 08:04 PM (vnSBY)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

A New Faction of the "Truther" Movement

Uncomfortable questions are being raised about the "official story" of the attack on a revered symbol of power and greatness:

3) Why was the rebel pilot who supposedly destroyed the Death Star reported to be on the Death Star days, maybe hours, prior to its destruction? Why was he allowed to escape, and why were several individuals dressed in Stormtrooper uniforms seen helping him?
4) Why has there not been an investigation into allegations that Darth Vader, the second-ranking member of the Imperial Government, is in fact the father of the pilot who allegedly destroyed the Death Star?

March 01, 2007

Rules For Mailing Feces

(Sanford, Florida) Seminole County Commissioner Mike McLean was sent a package of feces in the mail, presumably by a disconcerted, albeit regular, constituent. No threat was included.

With a measure of confidence, I'd suggest that McLean is not the first politician to receive lumpy criticism. Even so, there are rules regarding the transmittal of feces through the mail.

A Postal Service spokeswoman said the U.S. Postal Service prohibits sending feces through the mail except for medical or veterinary purposes, and in those instances the samples must meet rigorous packing and labeling requirements.
Without some implied or written threat, however, a poop-filled package won't get the sender in trouble on the first offense.

Well, how about that? First offense means no trouble.

Now, that gives me an idea. What if a few million Americans exercised a one-shot opportunity to send a loaf of wishes to Venezuelan thug dictator Hugo Chavez? It would be simple. Merely take an envelope when visiting the hopper. Fill it and make sure that the packaging is rigorous. Don't include a return address. Remember, no trouble if caught.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 05:13 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.

February 27, 2007

YouTube Video : "Candyman"

Posted by: Ragnar at 09:43 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.

A Video for All Our Gadget-Lovers...

Posted by: Ragnar at 08:56 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 6 words, total size 1 kb.

February 24, 2007

Caption This!

capt.78ee2b7dece44e458cc237b7052aec70.bush_alternative_fuels_nccd103.jpg

I quit drinking in 1986!*

*Yes, that's an actual quote. :-)

Posted by: Good Lt. at 08:39 AM | Comments (42) | Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I have here the first batch of the magic elixer that will rid us of islamofascism !!

Posted by: Edward Lunny at February 24, 2007 09:57 AM (QkaPP)

2 "Thirsty, Nancy?"

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at February 24, 2007 10:46 AM (vRnST)

3 <b>George:</b> "Good news, Dick, I think we've found a cure for Tourette's Syndrome."

<b>Dick:</b> "That's @#$!!ing great, Mr. President."

Posted by: McGehee at February 24, 2007 02:08 PM (lAOTn)

4 Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the greatest scientific breakthrough in the history of mankind! The cure for liberalism!

Posted by: Timothy S. Carlson at February 24, 2007 03:54 PM (TfTAE)

5 Bush: "Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you condensed liberal intelligence - and it only costs $1B per gram!"

Reporter: "Why is it so expensive, Mr. President?"

Bush: "You wouldn't believe how many liberals it takes to make a gram of this stuff!"

<rimshot>

Thank you, thank you. I'm here all week. Enjoy the buffet!

Posted by: Timothy S. Carlson at February 24, 2007 03:58 PM (TfTAE)

6 "I don't know why you need this. You got the wrong guy! I already told you I didn't have sex with that woman ... Ms Lewinsky."


                             USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 24, 2007 04:08 PM (2OHpj)

7 "Well they told me it's suppossed to be the soul of Jack Murtha, but it looks to me as if it's just a quivering cowardly corrupt blob of slime ..." USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 24, 2007 04:13 PM (2OHpj)

8 "Check it out! The entire moral character of the political left, with some flour added for substance." USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 24, 2007 04:15 PM (2OHpj)

9 "Bet you didn't know I'm Eddie Van Halen's father!"

Posted by: Hucbald at February 24, 2007 04:35 PM (w8csg)

10 here cindy...here girl...come to g.w.....

Posted by: dr. akim ullshitbay at February 24, 2007 08:09 PM (lM0Mr)

11 I gotcher WMDs right here! =^.^=

Posted by: SecretSquirrel at February 24, 2007 09:34 PM (YwdKL)

12 Remember that sumbitch in Iran? I got something here that will make his lil' tally-wacker do cartwheels. Yep, sure do. Hehehehe

Posted by: Bubbe at February 24, 2007 10:29 PM (vZBQO)

13 When Hillary is lured in by this blood sample, I can finally drive a stake through the beast's heart!

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:03 PM (Dt3sl)

14 "This will prove I fathered Anna Nicole's baby. Don't tell Laura."

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:05 PM (Dt3sl)

15 "Heh, heh! I hold in my hands all the blood, sweat and tears leftists have shed on behalf of this country since 1776! Heh, heh! Heh heh!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:09 PM (Dt3sl)

16 "Here's your quart, leftwing bloodsuckers. The pound of flesh may take awhile. Does shit count?"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:12 PM (Dt3sl)

17 "Heh, heh! Ten bucks says Osamabinhiding eats this doody sample!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:17 PM (Dt3sl)

18 "Heh, heh! I cant wait to see the look on Queen of the House Pelosi's face when she finds out this isn't really botox! Heh, heh! How can you tell when Skelator is surprised, anyway? Her skin is stretched so thin across her skull that she has to blink uncontrollably just to close her grimacing mouth!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:22 PM (Dt3sl)

19 "Now we know how much bile a leftard spews every time he opens his mouth!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:23 PM (Dt3sl)

20 "Maybe I should launch another war for oil. This all I got from Iraq so far!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:26 PM (Dt3sl)

21 "I got Jack Murtha's special Mocha Latte right here! Heh, heh! I gave it the Presidential Seal of Poop Approval by eating ten chimichangas and washing them down with Mexican water. I hope he likes his mochas at room temperature!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:31 PM (Dt3sl)

22 "Heh, heh! Tell Harry Reid this diarrhea is gollum food and see if he eats it!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:46 PM (Dt3sl)

23 Check this blood sample against Bin Laden's DNA. I believe it'll prove Murtha's been blowing him!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:56 PM (Dt3sl)

24 Can Jeff have a 'Fatwa' for persistence? USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 07:09 AM (2OHpj)

25 Jeff only deserves a flaming bag of poop on his porch, Michael. Although, some of his captions are quite funny, I'll admit.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 02:41 PM (JVqe0)

26 Speaking of funny...I found a clip of Jeff Lube & GayRooster online:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUnwbpNejsQ

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 04:08 PM (JVqe0)

27 Speaking of funny, osamasmama isn't.

Flame on. I expect no less of a flamer like you.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 07:54 PM (Dt3sl)

28 "Getting the stool sample in the beaker was easy. Getting the beaker out of my butt was the hard part."

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 07:55 PM (Dt3sl)

29 "Heh! Look what dribbled out of Osamashitforbrains' head!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 07:56 PM (Dt3sl)

30 "I got a campaign contribution for Hilary!"

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 07:57 PM (Dt3sl)

Osamabinstalking

You asked me why I might defend Jeff, and greyrooster. You may not know this, but a few times I also defended No Fear, who is pretty clearly a lefty. Well besides the fact I consider Jeff, and greyrooster to be on my side a lot of the time, I don't like to see anyone stalked from thread to thread, and I try to catch myself when I feel the urge to do some of it myself.

Greyrooster, and Jeff often have very good points, and even if I disagree with some of them, they do deserve as much chance to be heard as anyone. No Fear I actually seemed to get along with, and I think actually discussing the differences of opinion had merit.

I resort to name calling sometimes. If I get mad, I usually settle on some fairly simple term, like 'dork' and call my target by that. It allows me to show disgust, but it still keep the sentences free of a lot of extra garbage. Even that, I try to avoid. Sometimes I call someone ignorrant when it is uncalled for.

Now it so happens that I value the patriotism of Jeff, and Greyrooster, and for that reason alone, I would defend their ability to comment here. If only for the sake of free speech, I even value Ken Hoop's comments, though I still have an obligation to attack them.

Comments like #26 aren't argueing. They aren't necessarily funny, and they are intended to demean other commenters, regardless of the merits of any arguements made by those commenters. It isn't cool to have to sort through these on every single thread. If you can't ignore Jeff's name-game, you could handle it differently.

I admit, I don't usually care for Jeff's name calling, but sometimes it is actually funny. With Jeff, I try to read the content of his arguement. If there is no content beyond a personal attack, I ussually just skip over it. If I see two or three in a row, that are only an attack, I skip the thread. If I see two or three personal attacks, minus an actual arguement, from ANYONE, in a row ... I will usually skip the rest of the thread.

I doubt I'm the only one who does this.

So lets see ... since your squabbling with grey, and Jeff, then there is a pretty good chance that I'll get three in a row wherever all three of you are at. If we lump in some of the others who like the personal attack, well, I could just go to Town Hall and get my news fix.couldn't I?

A little name calling is OK. When everyone piles on, it gets bad, and I'm VERY AGAINST BANNING PEOPLE, so I hope nobody thinks that is my point. I'm saying, if you think your a great debator, then DEBATE, dammit!! Let the reader decide who to skip over, and stop adding jumps to the course OK???

COMMENTER! POLICE THYSELF!!! Raise the bar, don't go under it! Leave that for others.

I like Greyroooster, and Jeff just fine, and I'm not following your 'funny' links. If they do that to you, I'm not following those links either. I'm boycotting all of those links! Everyone got that?

I'm not going to post any funny links of my own about Ken Hoop either. I'm not perfect, but flinging giant monkey turds isn't that hard to avoid doing!

Since Jeff, and greyrooster may read this, may I encourage my allies to take this occassion to consider the value of thier arguements, That value may be lost when people don't read past the personal attack portion. It's something to consider.

Anyway, Osamabinnotasfunnyashethinksheis, I hope you understand this longish answer to your question, and I hope I have had some influence in raising the level of exchange. It's something WE ALL SHOULD DO.

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 08:02 PM (2OHpj)

32 Sorry about the OFF TOPIC comment! I needed to say it somewhere.... USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 08:03 PM (2OHpj)

33 Ok Michael. I think a while back I decided to try and ignore Jeff and that lasted about....hahaha....a day? Probably because I tend to not let anyone take a swipe at me without swiping back. Tell you what though, I think you might be right about this. From this point forward, I'll try a week of ignoring Jeff and Rooster unless they address me in a civil manner. We'll see how that goes. I can't guarantee it, but I'll try.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 09:28 PM (JVqe0)

34 I appreciate that. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 10:38 PM (2OHpj)

35 I'm sure many will...haha.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 10:50 PM (ZxuJ4)

36 Osamabinhuntinforsympathy:

Don't fool yourself. Nobody appreciates you.

I respectfully submit that you only swipe at people online--and any poor men in your hateful life who are subject to the misandrist lawsof your local government.

We both know you wouldn't have the guts to swipe at me in person.

My captions are still thefunniest, by the way. There's nothing funny about your intolerance or stupidity.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 26, 2007 02:03 AM (Dt3sl)

37 Michael, it really is a test of patience, eh? I'm actually kind of enjoying ignoring him now.

Posted by: osamabinthere at February 26, 2007 03:31 AM (ZxuJ4)

38 Jeff, you are funny sometimes but the rest of the time you are just mean.

Posted by: tbone at February 26, 2007 11:11 AM (HGqHt)

39 "Elections lasting more than 4 months should be treated by the Supreme Court..."

Posted by: ken at February 26, 2007 04:18 PM (qE06o)

40 And I thought #39 was funny, BTW. USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 26, 2007 06:54 PM (2OHpj)

41 Tbone:

Heaven forbid I should be mean to a shit-licking troll who hates America almost as much as she does men and their penises.

Shouldn't you be sitting on the Naked Trucker's lap eating a glazed doughnut?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 27, 2007 03:33 AM (Dt3sl)

42 One drink of this and you can recieve full goverment protection it will turn you into a california condor

Posted by: sandpiper at February 28, 2007 11:32 AM (4pkrX)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

American Idol's Antonella Barba Photos UNCENSORED

American Idol contestant Antonella Barba is the latest chick to get herself embroiled in controversy by (allegedly) getting naughty in a set of private photos (a/k/a pics, pictures, images). more...

Posted by: Ragnar at 12:29 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.

Everything Destroyed In Super Slow Mo

Allah's got the slow-motion 2nd Amendment porn. We've got everything else.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 12:07 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.

February 23, 2007

File Under: Holy Sh*t!

Posted by: Good Lt. at 03:41 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.

250kb generated in CPU 0.1707, elapsed 0.2147 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.1004 seconds, 565 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

March 26, 2007

March 21, 2007

March 20, 2007

March 15, 2007

March 14, 2007

March 13, 2007

March 10, 2007

March 09, 2007

March 08, 2007

March 07, 2007

March 06, 2007

March 05, 2007

March 03, 2007

March 02, 2007

March 01, 2007

February 27, 2007

February 24, 2007

February 23, 2007

Recent Comments