Believe it our not, I really do work to put together posts that I think y'all will enjoy.
I've been informed that, before I signed on as a guest blogger here, the use of "hot chicks" to generate traffic was just not done around here, and my repeated posting of nubile young things, Google bait and juvenile humor has apparently besmirched the image of The Jawa Report.
I've been thinking about it, and maybe these readers have a point. Perhaps Ragnar has gone overboard with the fluff(ers).
On the other hand, it occurs to me that the loudest in the group don't necessarily speak for the crowd, and we all like a little "T&A" with our news.
Discuss amongst yourselves.
1
I like the stuff....but I am a pig of a man.
"Perhaps Ragnar has gone overboard with the fluff(ers).Now if we could just get him to stop refering to himself in the third person.
Posted by: Randman at February 13, 2007 11:48 PM (Sal3J)
2
Perhaps you should go post over at Perez Hilton or one of those other sleazebag blogs, Ragnar? Your posts certainly are more becoming over there than they are here. If you could contribute slightly more than T&A every day, I would likely not feel the way I do. If it was occasionally, it would be one thing but, for the most part it seem that's all you know how to do. I come to Jawa to get my *real* news and it's a shame your posts are cheapening what many work hard to contribute here every day. If this site wasn't as well respected as it is, I wouldn't give a rat's ass. But it is, and I do.
Honestly, how much time *do* you really spend copying and pasting code to insert T&A pictures in a post? Just sayin.
Posted by: Mary at February 14, 2007 12:15 AM (fdAim)
3
I think it's great Ragnar is making the new popsugar.com
Ragnar can you tell us what shoes Britney is wearing? does it match her purse?
Posted by: davec at February 14, 2007 01:11 AM (yaQM4)
4
The difference between Ragnar's posts and the others is that Ragnar's babe posts are neither topical nor funny.
I like looking at hot chicks, but I'm more of a quality than quantity guy. And Ragnar keeps posting 8s and 9s. Either limit yourself to 10s, or 'bone up' on your comedic writing skills to compensate!
Posted by: wooga at February 14, 2007 01:12 AM (2YapR)
5
Beth I hadn't noticed, is he that bad?
:-)
Axe'tually, MiL-news, WOT, Islamo-Paleo, and Politics are my #1 obsession..... a little gun p0rn would be nice..
Posted by: Rubin at February 14, 2007 01:16 AM (vNHyy)
Posted by: Rubin at February 14, 2007 01:17 AM (vNHyy)
7
Thanks for the mammarys...couldn"t resist.
Posted by: Kevin at February 14, 2007 01:37 AM (KAKzj)
8
Fie on Mary, Beth et al.
T&A and blogging go hand in... ah...
Posted by: Hucbald at February 14, 2007 01:57 AM (N7vDN)
9
Those posts are totally inappropriate. Which is of course why I enjoy them....
Posted by: HerrMorgenholz at February 14, 2007 02:34 AM (DY5y4)
10
Maybe they're right Ragnar, I certainly don't mind them but I don't come here for them. If it might keep some folks from coming here, making comments etc. then it is probably not worth it.
Posted by: Buzzy at February 14, 2007 02:39 AM (+sYX1)
11
It's getting to where I'm embarrassed to check the Jawa Report while I'm at my mother's house. Come on, just give me the news. If some of these other lame-o's want some soft porn, this is the Internet, I'm sure they won't have any trouble finding some.
Posted by: Big Dan at February 14, 2007 02:46 AM (FYLaH)
12
OK I'm a fan of Ragnar's political posts. Count on that.
A healthy human being will always appreciate the other sex, even if they are happy in their relationship. It's the unhappy ones like WJ Clinton that you have to worry about. They are the ones who go from appreciating, to desire, to pursuit, to ... disgrace.
I finally married a woman who is perfect for me. As the years go by it just gets better and better.We don't oppress each other either. She is allowed to admire Viggo Mortensen, and I'm allowed to admire Audrey Hepburn. We forgive each other that sort of thing because it is harmless.
If Viggo, and Audrey teamed up on a daring and successful mission to expose a political conspiracy in Hollywood, and the story became known to someone like Ragnar, it would be extremely appropriate to post as a comment to the Jawa Report.
It is also appropriate to post regarding beautiful women breaking the bonds of Islamic oppression by appearing in a beauty pageant, or in movies, or even racing cars. I like the Iranian woman who came to America, became a citizen, made herself a multimillionaire, and became one of those $20 million passengers to the international space station. She is a very pretty lady, and is exactly the kind of woman who warrants a post here at the Jawa Report. In good taste. She IS an American heroine after all.
I want my neices to see women they can respect on the posts at this Blog. All our youth need good examples.
I do understand the cheescake girl on the nose of the plane type of thing. I think that is part of what Ragnar is trying to do, but nowdays the woman are piloting quite a few of those planes, and nose art isn't really showing respect for them the way they would most appreciate it. And a Blog isn't a B-17 either.
I told my wife before we got married that it was impossible for me not to notice a beautiful woman, and this is true. I've been a girl watcher for a long time. Maybe this makes my comment here hypocritical, but I really would rather see 'less' than I have been. The things that made Jayne Mansfield really remarkable were above her neck, but that is lost on people not old enough to remember. She is a borderline case for a strong woman who wouldn't do well under Sharia. Even though I am a fan, I do not think posting her was the best use of bandwidth here.
I'll still click on Ragnar's posts because I know his work on politics is worthwhile, but I will looking for substance, not skin.
In a way, that is what made some of this season's cheescake topical. It was a comment on social decay, to a large degree. Young women following bad examples, to become bad examples themselves. And Rosie's pustulent orofice spewing from her bully pulpit made some of it slightly more topical. But I believe a line was crossed. Is our friend Ragnar adding to that decay? Certainly not intentionally ... but it might be worth taking a minute to think about it.
I would appreciate a tasteful post with Audrey Hepburn in it, but I am willing to go google her and click onto her official site. I can do that on my own. What I find much more difficult is getting links to accurate news on the Jihad, the GWOT, the creeping socialism of Kos, Soros, and Chomsky, and the ACLU, and judicial activism.
Give me that first, and if you have nothing better to do, then how about a Hepburn, and Mortensen double feature (clothed). The post could talk about their impact on American culture, and I'd think that was close enough to topical to get away with.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 14, 2007 03:38 AM (2OHpj)
13
Oink, oink, oink, oink.
Keep 'em coming, Ragnar! Can't be all hard news, gotta have some fun. That is one of the things that distinguishes the Right-O-sphere from the Left. They never have fun.
Of course, the other part is that they are pure insane.
Posted by: William Teach at February 14, 2007 07:49 AM (doAuV)
14
Hey,
I love the cheesecake posts.... BUT....
I don't think they belong here. My primary reason is that this is a great clearinghouse for information on Islamic extremism, and I often send links to this site to friends of mine as we have ongoing debates about politics and whether Islam is a religion of peace. I dread to think that one day they will follow my link only to find a sexy looking thing near the top of the blog. It just won't look good for TJR or for me, and will damage the credibility of this blog's work, especially if this friend happens to be a woman, who probably isn't particularly interested in scantily clad babes.
My suggestion is to put the cheesecake in a separate page, not the main one, so that people investigating Islam or following links from friends won't see something that will call the credibility of the blog into question.
Posted by: Scandalon at February 14, 2007 09:13 AM (CTwmV)
15
Comrades,
I couldn't help but wonder if the screeching females who are complaining about the images are just a tad bit jealous of the competition?
In the interest of fairplay, Ragnar, why don't you post some beefcake for the lasses, and the limp-wristy boys. I'm certain some of them sneak over here to try and remember what it was like to once be a real man.
I find the pron pix a nice diversion, a pleasant little bit of eye candy to soften the revulsion I feel when I read about the mind-numbing incompetence and treason that the left seems to spew forth in never-ending streams.
Just remember to put on pix of real women, not those heroin-chic looking feminimrods like usually hang out with leftists. or take jobs as political bloggers. Those sorts would give a homo nightmares.
Respects,
Posted by: Gwedd at February 14, 2007 09:19 AM (wlNg1)
16
Why was my post here deleted? Did I insult anyone? No. Did I say something offensive? No.
Not cool.
Posted by: JeepThang at February 14, 2007 09:19 AM (yZQoS)
17
My opinion. Keep doing them just a tab bet fewer of them. It is of course required to post bad miss USA and other stuff liek that to generate traffic. I'm sorry but its true. You can spend hours laboring over a "meaningful post" and you get nada. Post a nice pic of a somewhat less than chaste hottie and boom, more hits than you can shake a stick at. Its sad, but true. I think one or two per week is enough. And for god sakes, if there is a scandal post it immediately. I lucked out on miss USA she was from KY so I had all the pics saved on my other blog. Then when the shit hit the fan I was ready. Can't please everyone anyway.
Posted by: Howie at February 14, 2007 09:46 AM (YHZAl)
18
JeepThang -
I don't know why your comment was deleted. I didn't delete it, and neither did Howie.
Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold, Arrogant Prick at February 14, 2007 10:13 AM (MpoGp)
19
But Beth: My women are entertaining. Why would a man want one not to be?
Posted by: greyrooster at February 14, 2007 10:40 AM (iAgZm)
20
I think I understand the high divorce rate. Women just ain't women enough. Men should decide how men should act. Women should decide how women should act. Thoughout history it has always been backward. Women don't tell me how I should act around them or toward them. And I don't tell them how they should act. Hell! I want a women. Not a politically correct adversary who takes exception to what I say or do. News for you ladies I got married to an accomplished 20 year old knockout when I was almost 35. Both parents being professionals. What I have is a wife. A real one who knows how to act the part. I lived with 8 different women before I met my wife. Each time I traded, I traded up. When my wife starts telling me what I should do and say, I'll start trading again. She can talk to me, discuss with me. But telling me how to act and what to say. No way is that going to happen. Like I tell my wife, kids and grandchildren. This ain't no democratcy. This is a family and I'm the boss. If any of you femenists or candy assses don't agree. Screw you. How many divorces have you had and what are your children doing? My record is ) divorces and great productive children.
Posted by: greyrooster at February 14, 2007 10:58 AM (iAgZm)
21
Keep those hooters coming. No muslim skanks please.
Posted by: greyrooster at February 14, 2007 10:59 AM (iAgZm)
22
Beth sez : Ragnar, it's nice to know you think women are just as fair game for objectification as the ridiculous Koran-flushing "story."Oh yes. I sure as hell am, and
you troll for traffic with Google bait (including the cheap tart Google bait) nearly as much as I do, so please spare me your
holier-than-thou hypocrisy. When you stop posting pop tarts, then you'll have a leg to stand on. 'Til then, you can stuff a sock in it.
You totally don't get it, do you?Your point? No, actually, I don't. I doubt I'm alone on that one. If you think the posts I specifically linked are the sum total of the cheesecake posted to this blog over the last two years, you're just an idiot. I could go on with links for pages. This blog has
always featured the cheesecake on a
regular basis and there's
nothing wrong with that.
You know, there are actually a lot of conservative and libertarian women who argue with man-hating lefty feminists who say "all wingnut men are pigs." Thanks for being yet another loser poster child on the internets for their arguments, so people like me have to say "not ALL are," rather than "no they aren't."Beth, I honestly couldn't care less what a bunch of man-hating lefty feminists think of me. Sadly, God didn't bless them with penises and they'll never forgive him (or me) for that. Somehow, I find it tough to believe that you stay up late worrying about these things.
Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold, Arrogant Prick at February 14, 2007 11:01 AM (MpoGp)
23
Personally I like the Hot Women post especially and the occational hollywood popular garbage news. The Hot Women part well I am a guy and can't help it What.
It is a nice break in the dread the news is. And probably does much to keep me from going postal on some of these freekin pansies that somehow see our enemies moving against US yet still think either its our fault, a hug can fix it, it's Bush's fault or Bush's exageration, we are losing in Iraq, we should just talk it out. I run into these type everyonce in a while and it really is hard not to just spot check em, especially when they say we don't need to fight them its just Bush overhyping. In those cases I just want to b*tch slap one up side the head and ask should you fight back that was 93' WT, smack Kohbar towers, smack Narobi, smack Kenya, smack Cole, then wham knock em flat and say that was 9-11, tell.me when its OK to start fighting back.
I have sereous disdain for hollywood I believe they are both a main source of the cultural rot in the west and alot of why the world hates US so. I don't watch movies much if any, don't follow or even know all the stars in chic of X day of the week, or even watch what passes as TV. However I do like the Ragner post on the hollywood garbage news for two reasons. 1) better him than me follow that crap 2) it is nice in my daily travels to have at least functional knowledge of the recent hollywood crap that everyone seems to conversate about ala Britney punany on display (also qualifies as Hot chick theater double bonus), Parris hilton daily ho challenge, Parris hitlon crew ho out competition ect.... After all Hollywood garbage is always a good safe topic (when you don't need a fighting conversation like reality of the world).
Dam this turned into a long dribble of wated time...
Posted by: C-Low at February 14, 2007 11:10 AM (Iyhck)
24
"...we all like a little "T&A" with our news..."To paraphrase England's great bard
"A little T&A hightens the mirth but dulls the wits".A little endrophin release now and then does not no harm; in fact it may do some good.
Well done Ragnar :-)
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 14, 2007 11:26 AM (vixLB)
25
i was deleted too...first post in fact...whuzzup?
Posted by: dr. akim ullshitbay at February 14, 2007 12:33 PM (Ax65U)
26
Something wrong with the commenting system. Nothing new at the jawa.
Here's how you decide if cheesecake posts are good.
Lots of hits = good
fizzle = not good
How am I ever going to sell out to "the man" without the hits?
;-)
Posted by: Rusty at February 14, 2007 04:58 PM (JQjhA)
27
C-low: That wasn't wasted.
Posted by: greyrooster at February 14, 2007 05:00 PM (MK5KV)
28
yeah my comment was deleted too... it was after beth.
Posted by: Jake at February 14, 2007 06:07 PM (AeRA2)
29
To those who have had
'deletions'. I have had trouble before, and I sure it is a
glitch of some kind, and that nobody is being targeted. I am fully convinced that neither Rusty, nor any of his team would delete anyone without telling them something about it first. the only time I ever wondered about this was after 'Puddleduck' dissappeared, but then Greyrooster said siomething about him getting tired of getting his butt kicked, and I figured that made sense.
Please have faith in the Jawa team, because they do walk the walk. USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 14, 2007 10:15 PM (2OHpj)
30
Well then.. I shall reiterate..
Unless the people who run/own Jawa say something about the content nose-diving into the cesspool of the blogosphere, keep on posting as you do, Rag... Do-Rag! /guffaw.
I likes them ta-tas.
Posted by: JeepThang at February 14, 2007 10:27 PM (yZQoS)
31
Ah Bullshit! More cheesecake. And leave the muslim skanks out.
Posted by: greyrooster at February 16, 2007 08:18 AM (Lddpk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
