The Spring Defensive
Every year since we kicked the Taliban out, the media has brought forth the dreary prediction of a "Spring Offensive" which will crush our forces, drive us before them, and hear the lamentations of our women.
NATO-led troops killed 75 suspected insurgents on the first day of an offensive against Taliban militants in a valley in southern Afghanistan, a British military officer said Tuesday. The militants died Monday, when British, Danish and Afghan troops fought their way up the Sangin Valley in Helmand province, Maj. Dominic Biddick, who commanded a company of British troops in the operation, told The Associated Press.
How's that for Bush's Unilateralism Cowboy War?
Oh, here's the unilateralist approach:
On Monday, the U.S. military reported that 136 suspected militants were killed in three days of fighting in western Herat province -- the deadliest clashes in Afghanistan since January.
1
The large number in Herat province at the end of the article would suggest that the Talibs might be using Iran as an infiltration route to get in behind our troops.
Posted by: crosspatch at May 02, 2007 01:48 AM (y2kMG)
Posted by: DemocracyRules at May 02, 2007 06:55 AM (L/SIz)
3
Boy, there must be experiencing a serious virgin deficit in terrorist heaven. I mean, by this report alone they need 15192 = 72 * (75 + 1136) new virgins. :->>
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at May 02, 2007 08:27 AM (j97MF)
Posted by: David M at May 02, 2007 09:45 AM (jb28t)
6
Wow, great successes! And AP, as usual, can't bring itself to admit that their aspirations for the terrorists are failing--they will get their asses handed to them day in and day out as long as they fight head to head--but most of them refuse to, and kill innocent people while the AP fiddles.
The time is coming when the AP, Reuters, and other MSM outlets will face the fury of a disgusted public.
Posted by: Richard Romano at May 02, 2007 10:14 AM (iD1fP)
7
And every spring when the birds return from the south the vultures from the main-stream news media arrive
Posted by: sandpiper at May 02, 2007 03:41 PM (vnSBY)
Mullah Najibullah, You've Been....Thunderstruck
Our Boy kicking ass from the air in Afghanistan. The Taliban can sneak in, but it's a bit tougher to sneak out after their lame ambushes.
Via The Telegraph: Caught in the middle of the Helmand river, the fleeing Taliban were paddling their boat back to shore for dear life.
Smoke from the ambush they had just sprung on American special forces still hung in the air, but their attention was fixed on the two helicopter gunships that had appeared above them as their leader, the tallest man in the group, struggled to pull what appeared to be a burqa over his head...
...By the time the gunships had finished, 21 minutes later, military officials say 14 Taliban were confirmed dead, including one of their key commanders in Helmand...
"Some of them were trying to get the heavy machine-gun up a small hill to engage us," Lt Denton said. "Capt Staley used the 30mm gun to take out the two guys who had taken off, and then we fixed on the ones with the heavy machine-gun. They were huddled around a large boulder and we shot them. We put as many rounds around it as we could, because if they got to it they could cause us trouble. But they never had a chance to set it up."
Using its cannon and then its rockets, the Apache finished off all the Taliban fighters it could find, then launched nail-filled rockets and dropped white phosphorous to destroy the motorcycles and the machine guns. After the shooting stopped, 12 Taliban were confirmed dead...
.....for now, the American airmen are not losing any sleep over it. "When you are on top of the enemy you look, shoot and it's, 'You die, you die, you die..."
If you are a Taliban fighter, get your affairs in order post haste.
1
Taleban negotiations would be like other deals made by Islamic aggresors. Good as long as they work against the infidel, and then find an excuse to break them. USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at April 29, 2007 07:45 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Richard Romano at April 30, 2007 01:44 AM (iD1fP)
7
Do you see what happens when you fuck with the most powerful armed forces humanity has ever known? Do you? Thanks America for taking such stupidity out of the gene pool. Those birds really do look menacing. I think it's safe to say that those Taliban fighters died with a few pounds of cacka in their britches.
'...the tallest man in the group struggled to pull what appeared to be a burqa over his head...' That gives a perfect idea of the kind of scum we're dealing with here.
The typical conspiracy-theorist, terrorist-appeaser, hypocrite, paranoid schizophrenic line, in respose to this article would be, 'Oh the humanity! They used white phosphorous which is widely frowned upon - and some people have called to be made illegal - and nail bombs. An Afghan child could stand on one of those nails and hurt his foot! Oh, how horrible! Truly the real terrorists are the USA and anyone who disagrees with us!'
Good job boys.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at April 30, 2007 06:20 AM (8OiB3)
8
Ahhhh! The smell of napalm in the morning. Clears your head up so you can smell the roses.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 30, 2007 07:21 AM (sL7GA)
Pardon Me, Can You Remove This Knife?
Openly Socialist NDP Party stabs covertly Socialist Labor Liberal Party in the back by siding with Conservative Party to block withdrawal of Canadian troops from Afghanistan.
I love it when they eat their own.
Money quote:
Dion also indicated that Canadian soldiers could be more profitably utilized in Afghanistan setting up democratic processes, a judicial system, a functioning economy.
"If we focus on the combat mission and we don't try to do the other things, what is being gained?"
Well, teh stoopid, if you don't kill the Taliban and Al Qaeda first, there won't be democratic processes, a judicial system, or a functioning economy.
Thanks to the scary brown person who lives in Canada for the email.
1
good to know sasquatch is back online...i was getting worried.
Posted by: dr. akim ullshitbay at April 25, 2007 08:12 PM (OCam4)
2
THE OPEN SOCIALISTS stabbed the closet socialists because they want the troops home RIIGHHT NOOW! Dion, the leader of the closet socialists wouldn't know the Canadian military if it *** him in broad daylight (oops, hockey player talk).
One of my favorite quotes from Canada's finest, in the middle of a firefight with the Taliban, one soldier bellows, "Where do you want your well?"
Posted by: DemocracyRules at April 25, 2007 08:22 PM (L/SIz)
3
Too bad you guys left us to clean up your mess there as well. No matter. We got it sorted.
Posted by: John at April 25, 2007 08:38 PM (S3Rzh)
4
Vinnie, A few months back the leader of the separatist Bloc Quebecois tried a similar move; not only was his motion defeated, in fact he ended up losing some political ground within Quebec. It was rather stupid of Dion not to have learnt from BQ's experience. Some bozo's never learn.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at April 25, 2007 08:45 PM (j97MF)
5
That would be the Liberal party. The Labour party is English.
/Canadian colour commentary
Posted by: Flea at April 25, 2007 09:07 PM (4kmdd)
6
I was in Guam after Afghanistan/before Iraq and got snot-slinging drunk with some Canadian military guys returning from 'stan one night. Awesome dudes. Money exchange:
Huckleberry the Bald: "Thanks for standing with the U.S. in this."
Louis Cyr-looking Canadian Military Dude: "Hell, we're just happy you invited us to the party."
Massive laughter and a round on me followed.
Canada is a lot like the US in that its political face to the world is retarded, but the people are kick-ass cool.
Full Disclosure: I'm a U.S. citizen, but I was born in Newfoundland: Dad was a USAF pilot stationed there in 1957.
Posted by: Hucbald at April 25, 2007 09:36 PM (94gQ6)
7
I thought you said you were leaving John. Why are you still here trolling.
Posted by: Randman at April 25, 2007 10:02 PM (Sal3J)
Posted by: greyrooster at April 25, 2007 10:04 PM (yp+ZO)
9
To Huckbald: Well yeah, those Canadian soldiers were completely serious. I mean, if they are ordered to do peacekeeping, they will, and they will enjoy it, in a kind of non-hockey kind of way. But actually getting to kill bad guys is much more fun. Last winter, the Taliban were rumored to keep fighting all year. I imagined Canadians on skidoos with 0.50 caliber machine guns on them--the boys (and girls) would have hated that!
Posted by: DemocracyRules at April 25, 2007 10:20 PM (L/SIz)
Considering how thoroughly he was busted lying in another thread here (http://jawacomments.mu.nu/?post=187585) the fact that he is lying again shouldn’t come as any surprise.
Hucbald, Canadians are nothing but Fraynch speaking, effeminate socialists. Every poutine eating one of them.
Posted by: Fagnar at April 25, 2007 11:57 PM (b0FZu)
12
The NDP must be getting some static for being so pro Taliban recently. I think that the Mr. Dion is trying to sweep up the ultra far left from the NDP since they have no hope in hell of winning back Liberal voters who went right after the Libs got caught shoveling taxpayer's cash into their car trunks; at least until they choose a leader who is not far left and does not welcome back the same crooks that were kicked out.
I just hope that some of our vets go into politics after their service is over. I would like to be able to vote for someone with some integrity for a change.
Posted by: Saul at April 26, 2007 12:10 AM (hgX7d)
We honor their sacrifice, pray for their families back home, and thank them and their buddies for serving alongside our people.
Thanks to GM.
Sgt. Donald Lucas, 31, of Burton, N.B.;
Cpl. Christopher Paul Stannix (reservist), 24, of Dartmouth, N.S.;
Cpl. Aaron E. Williams, 23, of Lincoln, N.B.;
Pte. Kevin Vincent Kennedy, 20, of St. Lawrence, Nfld.; and
Pte. David Robert Greenslade, 20, of Saint John, N.B.
Cpl. Brent Poland of Sarnia, Ont.
My hearfelt sympathy goes out to the families of these true heros. May God help them in their healing.
Posted by: allahakchew at April 10, 2007 08:18 AM (BrndJ)
4
Thank you Vinnie. As far as I'm concerned these and all coalition servicemen and women who have made the ultimate sacrifice have died as Martyrs to Goodness and Peace.
I'll never forget the following statement by President G.W. Bush: "Freedom is not America's gift to the world. Freedom is God's gift to every man woman and child on this planet."
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at April 10, 2007 09:00 AM (j97MF)
Campaign to "Talebanise" Pakistan Reaches Islamabad
his was just one of several signs in the past ten days that a creeping campaign to “Talebanise†Pakistan has spread from tribal areas on the Afghan border right to the heart of the capital. And to judge from the Government’s response, even here it is reluctant to confront the radical clerics who openly preach jihad (holy war) and defy the writ of the state.Read the rest here.
There's very little good news from Pakistan these days. Time is on the side of the Taleban, and as y'all know, Pakistan has nukes. So if the Taleban take over Pakistan (which is getting more likely with time), they'll have nukes. And once the Taleban has nukes, al-Qaeda will have nukes. And once al-Qaeda has nukes, all bets are off.
1
Pakistan is nothing more than a pseudo-country carved out of the ancient India civilization by a bunch Muslim bigots.
The name itself is a made-up one also which means "The province of the clean" since Mo-slimes consider non-Muslims unclean.
For this reason, not only is Pakistan not going to confront Islamists;
in fact quite the opposite, Pakistan needs Islamism to justify its
existence.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at April 06, 2007 11:30 AM (EdIIN)
2
My trigger finger is starting to itch. Sounds like a little "civil engineering" of the mountain range (and surrounds) with some thermal "imaging" might help improve the quality of the neighborhood. A sort of urban renewal.
Posted by: Bert at April 06, 2007 11:35 AM (0FGKd)
3
Trusting Pakistan is trusting muslims. You just can't do it. We are at war with this gutter religion.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 06, 2007 07:44 PM (NU+M0)
Afghan Women in Uniform
In typical fashion, the major networks have expressed no interest in the following story. While they endlessly drone on about IED attacks in Iraq, or a Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan, nobody mentions the astounding fact that women are serving in the new Afghan army.
Click here to view the article that accompanies this video.
1
Wonderful! Wonderful! What the U.S. is doing in the defence of its citizens entails uplifting the down-trodden who in turn join the fight against terrorism. The phrase "virtuous cycle" comes to mind.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 28, 2007 04:16 PM (j97MF)
4
Afghan women standing up is a good thing. Every entitiy that we can get to support the war an terror is important. Give credit where credit it due. Don't rule women out as they may be your next enemy if you believe in sharia.
Posted by: allahahachew at March 28, 2007 05:31 PM (BrndJ)
5
Funny... not a peep about this from the so-called feminists.
Posted by: Kafir at March 28, 2007 05:32 PM (HsmTD)
6
Not sure if this is good or bad. It's diffinately a slap in the face to the local muslims.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 28, 2007 08:13 PM (LXuMj)
7
It is the biggest insult to them GR. The only way it could be better is to dip their bullets in pigs blood. Probably ruins their chances of becomeing one of the 72 in the after life.
'Hundreds of militants' Attack Pakistan
From worsening Taliban rallying pointborder region between Afghanistan and Pakistan:
Hundreds of militants fired rockets, killed one security official and kidnapped a school principal Wednesday in a northwestern town where police had slain two men accused of recruiting students for suicide attacks, police said.
The overnight raid underlined the strength of the militants and the weakness of Pakistani authorities in a swath of territory along the Afghan border where Taliban guerrillas fighting in Afghanistan find sanctuary. The United States fears al-Qaida is trying to regroup in the same area.
Several hundred gunmen launched the attack in Tank, a town in North West Frontier Province, sparking an hours-long battle that left at least one member of the paramilitary Frontier Constabulary dead...
Probably those damn Christians and their Bibles again. Damn Jooooos, too.
2
If the Pakistani's were at all serious about dealing with these f**kers, rather than giving them de-facto autonomy, they would join forces with the coalition/NATO to squeeze the terrorist vermin from both sides of the Afghanistan/Pakistan border.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 28, 2007 02:02 PM (j97MF)
3
I like the idea of sanctuary, it gives the toiletban a place to regroup, eat figs and consider the next best move to bring the fight to the world. It also translates into just a few coordinates, let them consolidate, let them all stand together as one, in a small..... tight .... area. Say cheese goat humpers!
PAKISTAN: U.S. TROOPS ARREST DEPUTY HEAD OF TALIBAN IN WAZIRISTANAccording to AKI:
American troops in Afghanistan arrested on Thursday the deputy head of the Taliban fighters active in the Pakistani tribal area of Waziristan, according to a report on the Arab satellite television channel Al Jazeera. A unit of US special forces penetrated the town of Loramani in Waziristan which border Afghanistan, capturing the Taliban leader Mullah Hakimallah Mansub.
1
So I'm guessing the recent meeting between Dick Cheney and Pervez Musharraf went something like this -
Musharraf: al-Qaeda and the Taliban are not operating in Pakistan.
Cheney: Yes they are.
Musharraf: No, really, take my word for it.
Cheney: Suck my old hairy balls. We're going into Waziristan.
Musharraf: You cannot violate Pakistan's sovereign territory!
Cheney: 'Sovereign' my ass. You've been turning a blind eye to the activity in that region, so now we are going to clean that mess up.
Musharraf: You and what army?
Cheney: The United States Army. And maybe some of NATO's forces too. And if you get in our way, we'll cut you loose and let you deal with India all by yourself.
Musharraf: Well... if you put it that way... OK.
Posted by: Kafir at March 08, 2007 11:58 AM (HsmTD)
The following video purportedly shows a "swap meet" where contraband items are exchanged or sold at the border between Iran and Afghanistan.
From this video, it appears that one could stage a NASCAR event at the Afghan border... and nobody in our military or intelligence community would even notice.
That's not the way to win a war.
Cheney Targeted by Suicide Bomb
(Bagram Airbase, Afghanistan) From an undisclosed location, Taliban spokesman Mullah Hayat Khan said, "We wanted to target ... Cheney." Fortunately, the Taliban was unsuccessful.
A suicide bomber killed up to 10 people outside the main US military base in Afghanistan in an attack aimed at visiting Vice-President Dick Cheney, but Cheney was not hurt in the blast.
An American soldier and a South Korean who was part of the US-led coalition were killed, as was a US government contractor whose nationality was unknown, officials said. NATO put the toll at four, including the bomber, and 27 wounded.
Local police said 10 people died.
The Taliban claimed responsibility, saying the bomber knew Cheney was visiting the sprawling Bagram Airbase, about 60 km from Kabul.
I'd like to know how the Taliban knew Cheney's itinerary.
1
next time he wount make it!the world is better off without a war criminal ziono-fascist ,lesbo father,vermin thug!
Posted by: wefwer at February 27, 2007 07:33 AM (MtKnG)
2
That attempted assasination of Cheney was a subtle "fuck you" by Pakistani President Musharaff.
Musharaff is a dictator and a thug who needs to be removed from power.
If Pakistan undergoes a coup, perhaps the coup-leaders will deliver Musharaff to the Islamist mob in the Pakistani street who are knife waving devotees of Mohammed.
Posted by: GOP Core at February 27, 2007 07:48 AM (b0FZu)
guess what big dik cheney is also on the list hahahahhaha
Posted by: wefwer at February 27, 2007 09:00 AM (4jekX)
4
So when you go through all the preparation, build your bomb, and blow yourself to tiny pieces, and Allah looks upon your sacrifice with disfavor and grants you failure, do you still get your virgins?
Posted by: Matt at February 27, 2007 10:45 AM (jF5U7)
5
The kooks are out in full force--and I see they've left some "comments" on this thread (English not your best subject I see).
Incredibly, it is Cheney who is called evil, sadistic, and satanic-not the terrorist who murdered innocent civilians. This shows how ignorant the left and the MSM really are: they are playing right into the hands of the terrorists who know full well how weak our MSM is, and the pathetic loons who support them (that's right, the kooks at DU, Dkos, and Huff Post).
Really sad.
Posted by: Richard Romano at February 27, 2007 04:05 PM (/2Xsz)
6
Richard Romano, What you're witnessing in Wefner's comments is the perverted inverted "morality" of Islam. This is precisely why Islam itself is evil and Islam itself is the root of the problem. The governments and the courts in democracies of the world need to wake up and understand that they cann't treat Islam as another faith protected under personal freedoms inasmuch as Islam seeks to violate other people's peace property dignity and lives.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 27, 2007 08:41 PM (EdIIN)
7
maybe pelosi made a phone call..... serves him right for being realistic about her patriotism......
Chenney and ? in 08!!!
Posted by: wb at February 27, 2007 09:57 PM (kXveb)
8
wefwer you stupid ass! If Cheney was a shapeshifter he would be better looking! Dork! Besides, I never see him at any of our secret meetings in our 8th demensional telepathic assasination lair. Unless .... hmmm..... he has shifted his shape ...? Either way, your still stupid! I should buy stock in the tinfoil industry.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 28, 2007 05:26 AM (2OHpj)
Keep writing. You're convincing everyone who reads your comments. Convincing them that islame is a stone aged cult practiced by lice-ridden proto hominids.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at March 03, 2007 01:58 AM (Dt3sl)
Pakistan Cedes More Territory to Taliban/al-Qaeda
My Master Rusty Says, "The way I figure it, when Bill Roggio says something is important, I'm pretty sure he's right.
Via Bill Roggio: The Pakistani government is preparing to cede the Federally Administered Tribal Agency of Bajaur to the Taliban. Jan Aurakzai, the governor of the Northwest Frontier Province, has informed the media that a 'peace deal' fashioned after the Waziristan Accord is imminent, Dawn reports.
Bajaur has long been an al-Qaeda command and control center. The Taliban and al-Qaeda funnel their northern Afghanistan operations from Bajaur. Afghanistan's Kunar province, which sits just across the border from Bajaur, is one of the most violent provinces in Afghanistan.
More related entrys courtesy of Bill Roggio here and here.
1
I'm hoping NATO uses this as an invitation to go into Waziristan and eliminate the problem at the source.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 24, 2007 10:02 PM (EdIIN)
2
But that I mean, if the area is so unimportant to the Pakistani's that they are willing to relinquish their sovereignty over it, then they shouldn't terribly mind of the coalition were to use the area for target practice.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 24, 2007 10:04 PM (EdIIN)
3
This almost seems like a move by Pakistan to rid itself of this element, they know full well the U.S. will move in on the fuckers.
Posted by: steve at February 24, 2007 10:05 PM (TlIfZ)
Not trying to be gloomy, but it could signal wholesale incapacity on the part of Pakistans government to really do anything about it. I'd like to think it's a green light for coalition forces, but it could be a sign of worse things. USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 05:47 AM (2OHpj)
They Call Him "Rambo"Kim du Toit posts an inspiring story of an Afghan the GIs call "Rambo":
We have actually given him a couple of sets of the new ACU uniforms (the new Army digital camouflage) with the name tag RAMBO on it. His entire family was killed by the Taliban and his home was where our base currently resides. So this guy really had nowhere else to go.
Why do the GIs call this fellow "Rambo"? Because he does stuff like this when the bad guys show up:
Rambo fearlessly ran to the vehicle, reached thru the window and jerked the suicide bomber out of the vehicle before he could detonate and commenced to putting some red pipe to his heathen ass. He detained the guy until the MP got there. The vehicle only exploded when they tried to push it off base with a robot but none was hurt.
I’m still waiting for someone to give this guy a medal or something. Nothing less than instant US citizenship or something. A hat was passed around and a lot of money was given to him in thanks by both soldiers and civilians that are working over here.
I guess I just wanted to share this because I want people to know that it’s working over here.
They have tasted freedom. This makes it worth it to me.
JOHN W. HUNT, CPT, US ARMY Operations Officer Bagram Afghanistan
Posted by: greyrooster at February 01, 2007 08:26 PM (E7ALy)
4
This is a great story..I remember the 'Stars and Stripes' did a story on this guy a c ouple of years ago....http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=25831&archive=true I believe its the same guy.
Posted by: SF at February 02, 2007 07:42 AM (dLoDN)
5
sorry I don't know how to direct link that, just type in rambo at the search button at the stars and stripes and you will see it.
Posted by: SF at February 02, 2007 07:47 AM (dLoDN)
6
Entire family killed by the Taliban. Think about that. The left and some others think we can get along with people who behave as such. Murder and destruction caused by religion. Isn't religion supposed to be a good thing? When it turns into a bad thing shouldn't it be outlawed?
Posted by: greyrooster at February 02, 2007 07:33 PM (ERHpA)
7 I got to meet Rambo when I was in Afghanistan over a year ago. Somewhere I have pictures. When I heard the story of an Afghan grabbing the bomber in front of the American camp I immediately assumed it was him. It turns out I was right. And there is a lesson here. Afghans are fighting for their country's future with great courage. You can imagine the courage it would take to run to a bomber's car and drag him away from his detonation switch. Or to be a school teacher in rural Afghanistan. This is a show of raw courage that is sadly lacking in our Congress, but an everyday fact of life in our military. And among some of those who fight along side of us.
Posted by: Rob at February 05, 2007 03:27 AM (Uibui)
Taliban Opening "Schools" in Afghanistan
I'm not sure how this is even possible but I have to admit if the Taliban are this ballsy then a troop build up in Afghanistan is definitely needed:
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - The Taliban's governing body decided to open schools in the areas controlled by the militants in Afghanistan, the purported chief spokesman for the hardline militia told The Associated Press.
Abdul Hai Muthmahien said that Mullah Omar and other Taliban leaders decided that from March, Islamic education will be provided in at least six southern provinces — first for boys and later for girls.
"The U.S. and its allies are doing propaganda against the Taliban," Muthmahien said in a phone call to an AP reporter from an undisclosed location late Saturday. "Taliban are not against education. The Taliban want Shariah (Islamic) education."
Now wait a second, the Taliban are going to educate girls? Well, that is a step forward in a sense because prior to the US invasion of Afghanistan after 9/11, women were not allowed to go to school in Afghanistan. But, let's look at Shariah law for a second and see what they'll really be learning:
Servitude - "The woman cannot marry without the consent of her guardian. If she marries, her husband becomes her new guardian."
Reverence for Men - "A woman who wishes to be divorced needs the consent of her husband."
You're Not Worth Looking At - "And say to the believing women that they cast down their looks and guard their private parts and do not display their ornaments except what appears thereof, and let them wear their khumur over their bosoms, and not display their ornaments except to their husbands or their fathers, or their sons..."
The list goes on and on but those are just the highlights for women. If you're not a Muslim then you're truly screwed and have to live by those laws anyway in a Shariah system. But Islam is the religion of peace and tolerance, so long as you abide by their rules. Shariah law is the law of Islam; what it does to women is enough to make me not want to have it on this planet.
Posted by: Howie at January 21, 2007 02:50 PM (2cR/Y)
2
Does anyone know why we haven't heard about any demands for a surge in Afghanistan from our elected officials? I realize that Iraq is important, but I think that Afghanistan is at least just as important.
Posted by: Northern Cross at January 21, 2007 02:52 PM (7vz05)
3
Schools my ass. They are playing on the political correctness of the west by naming terrorist training camps "schools". Bullshit. Blow them up.
Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at January 21, 2007 06:39 PM (N7QLC)
4
Smirking Jack is right. There is no such thing as a muslime school. Their "schools" practice nothing but mindless koran recitations at best, and daughter killing terrorism whenever possible.
People need to stop thinking of islamopithecines as semi-rational people who have something in common with the rest of us. They aren't, and they don't. They really do have a stone aged mind-set, and they will never have what it takes to become part of humanity.
A serial killer doesn't look any different from the rest of us. Islamopithecines do, and you fools still refuse to recognize them for what they are.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at January 22, 2007 01:54 AM (abVz3)
5
Terror schools, with a PC friendly spin to the leftist media. IMO
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at January 22, 2007 11:11 PM (2OHpj)
Akhtar Mohammad Osmani, Confirmed Dead
It's just not been a good week to be a terrorist. What, with their poor performance in Somalia and now this!
Reuters via WaPo: But a senior Taliban commander who declined to be identified confirmed Osmani had been killed.
"He has died. We got this information on the day of the strike but our leadership ordered us not to disclose it," the commander, speaking by telephone, told a Reuters reporter in the Pakistani border town of Chaman.
"He was not only an experienced military commander but also good in making financial transactions for us. He had good contacts," he said, without elaborating.
"His death will have some bad impact on our movement for some time," he added.
Hurry brave mujahadbeens, run to Iraq, the Jihad needs you!. No wait, run to Afghanistan, the jihad needs you! No wait, run to Somalia the African Taliban of Losers needs you!
more...
The power of stateless Islamic terrorists is always slight. It is Sharia states, combined with the state financed terror that poses the more serious threat in my opinion.
Iran, Indonesia (is there really any doubt), Pakistan (if we arent watchful), and my all time favorite 'Great Satan' Saudi Arabia. The Saudi's are the ones I'm most upset with. I believe they are the worst exporters of 'hate' ideology.
I'm still waiting for a standard method to seperate 'moderates' from enemies. I think we should make a list of minimum requirements that establish a Muslim, as being moderate by an acceptable measure. Maybe we can have a post dedicated to just that discussion?
Happy New Year.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 27, 2006 05:19 PM (2OHpj)
3"I'm still waiting for a standard method to seperate 'moderates' from enemies. I think we should make a list of minimum requirements that establish a Muslim, as being moderate by an acceptable measure."
How about "Do you support the initiation of force against others?"
Some will lie. But then, if they later do commit violence, we have evidence of their failings either way. Getting individuals on the record as denying the politics of force commits them, and removes the subsequent endless yammering.
Posted by: a reader at December 27, 2006 06:40 PM (fJcsd)
A moderate Muslim is one who would fine or jail you for sharia law infractions rather than kill you. A Hobson's choice at best. Almost all Muslims I have ever known would like to see Sharia Law instituted worldwide.
As you might expect, the fate of non-Muslims is always dependant on the ruler at hand in the Islamic system, and one who is brutal is likely to kill with impunity. So it is with Sharia Law. It provides for just that eventuality. You're screwed if you are a non-Muslim.
Posted by: templar knight at December 27, 2006 07:22 PM (634o6)
5
Wasn't the Establishment Media crowing about a Tallywhakerban resurgence just last week?
I guess Osmani didn't get the news.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 28, 2006 12:50 AM (abVz3)
6
Boy is this going to piss the dems off. Stand by for attacks telling us how ignorant we are.
Posted by: Greyrooster at December 28, 2006 01:55 PM (MItWF)
Airstrike Sends Taliban Leader Home to Allah
From a CENTCOM press release:
KABUL, Afghanistan – Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Osmani, a senior member of the Taliban’s inner circle, was killed Dec. 19 in Helmand Province.
Credible intelligence led Coalition Forces to Osmani’s location near the border with Pakistan. His vehicle, traveling in a deserted area, was destroyed by a Coalition air strike, instantly killing him and two unidentified associates.
“Osmani was in the top ring of the Taliban leadership and he was also a close associate of Osama bin Laden and Gulbuddin Hekmatyr,†said Col. Tom Collins, Coalition spokesperson. “His death is a major achievement in the fight against extremists and their terrorist networks.â€
Osmani was the Taliban’s chief of military operations in the provinces of Uruzgan, Nimroz, Kandahar, Farah, Herat and Helmand. He played a central role in facilitating terrorist operations involving Taliban, al-Qaeda and the Haqqani Network, to include IED and suicide attacks, kidnappings, numerous atrocities against innocent civilians, and direct attacks on Coalition, NATO, and Afghan forces, Collins said.
The Associated Press story about Osmani's death is full of references to the US "claims," as if the wire service, especially after the Jamil Hussein fiasco, has the credibility to question CENTCOM.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 23, 2006 05:13 PM (8e/V4)
6
I thought that everything was snowed-in by this time of year
there. Maybe this is one of those hunter/killer SOCOM
things. It would be nice if once in a while they could sneak in,
cut their beard, slide a goat in their bed and get a few
pictures. But, on second thought, blowing them into tiny bits
seems a very good idea too.
Posted by: RicardoVerde at December 23, 2006 09:46 PM (yZ0Nx)
7
If Osmani were an "innocent civilian," the AP wouldn't have any problem reporting his death as an indisputable fact.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 24, 2006 12:29 AM (abVz3)
8
Well Rooster always nice to hear from you
Actually that "news" does not seem to have any real importance to it. Al Queda the Taliban the civil war in Iraq are not top driven organizations, killing the head does not necessarily kill the body.
The killing of al Zarqawi some months past in Iraq seems to have had little affect on al Queda's operations against our troops.
As for thinking this death would "break my heart" personal attacks (especially anonymous over the internet) often simply show a lack of convinction in one"s own position.
Not evryone (at last count 68%) who does not support the current Bush agenda are "traitors" or "terrorist lovers".
And, Rooster, in case your "friends" from the Bronx lost my address, it is still the same [THE JAWA REPORT DOES NOT ALLOW COMMENTERS TO POST ADDRESSES OR PHONE NUMBERS, BUT HERE' A PIC OF JOHN RYAN'S MOTORCYCLE - pic] Ave, if my motorcycle is parked out front it probably means I am home.
And Ricardo since you never have been there you probably were unaware that the weather there is really determined by the elevation more than by the season.
Posted by: John Ryan at December 24, 2006 12:45 PM (TcoRJ)
9
Hey Ryan, saw you finally made it over to my site to leave a couple of lameass comments.
Posted by: dick at December 24, 2006 01:47 PM (gerRj)
Al Qaeda and the Taliban were most certainly top driven organizations, as their current disarray and nuisance level status prove. Zawahiri doesn't make his ridiculous propaganda videos for nothing.
The greasing of Zarqueeri in Iraq dealt a terrific blow to terrorists the world over. Before he died, he was sniveling about how the Coalition was crushing the jihadis, and after his ignoble death and the death of his self anointed "successor," all the little gangs claiming to be Al Qaeda have been wailing and ululating in despair. "La la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la! allah preserve us from the Crusaders!"
Your islamopihecine propaganda fools nobody.
Lying always shows a lack of conviction "in one's own position."
The 68% of people you quoted don't want America to cut n' run from Iraq, nor do the idiots, traitors and koranimals who oppose America's presence in Iraq have any idea what the Bush Doctrine consists of. Mindless opposition to reality is nothing to brag about, in any case.
If elevation affected weather more than seasons, seasons wouldn't exist, shit for brains.
So what are you anyway? An America-last leftist dhimmie, or an islamopithecine? Either way, you take it up the ass.
Osmani is still dead and burning in hell, by the way.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 25, 2006 10:57 PM (abVz3)
11
Where he went its sure not paridise its just the oppisit
Posted by: sandpiper at December 26, 2006 10:19 AM (as4nC)
Nato Sends 50 Taliban to Allah
Inspired by Zawahiri’s message to fight for Jesus, Nato forces immediately went out and killed a bunch of Taliban. Allah gave a statement saying, “Despite the Taliban’s frequent murdering in his name, Murder is still against his will and the disappointed Taliban souls were sent strait to hell.†When asked for comment Jesus Christ said, “I know them not.â€
Irish Examiner: As part of Baaz Tsuka, ISAF forces have launched several air strikes against Taliban command posts, killing a number of senior Taliban leaders.
“Taliban leaders are fleeing or being killed, and the Taliban soldiers don’t know what to do,†Nugee said. “Like any organisation, if you take out the head, often the body doesn’t know what to do.â€
He said the operations are ongoing, but so far the joint forces have cleared three villages of Taliban.
1
Howie, things are not going well in Afghanistan. The situation may not be as bad as Iraq where you still can't drive to the Baghdad airport without great risk, but it isn't good.
The commander of all 32,000 NATO troops, Gen. David Richards has said that we are at a tipping point and that if things do not change in our favor that 70% of the population could switch their allegiance to the Taliban this winter. He said that 2 months ago Oct 8th. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/08/terror/main2072505.shtml
Posted by: John Ryan at December 20, 2006 04:03 PM (TcoRJ)
2
Yes John I know I can depend on you to throw codl water on any good news. Sound to me like things just got worse for the Taliban. The more they show themselves the more we can kill them. So they do Ok and get all cocky and brave. Then boom! See hwo this works I call it warm war. Since we can't go to Pakistan to get them we just have to kill the ones that present. We can hold them off for a long time this way if we are just patient.
Posted by: Howie at December 20, 2006 04:11 PM (YdcZ0)
3
In other words, terrorist heaven puts in an order for 3600 virgins. Sweeeeet
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at December 20, 2006 06:10 PM (vixLB)
4
Howie, This "John Ryan"'s method of pretending to be a westerner while constantly trying to belittle coalition victories is a very familiar form of Islamist "Taq'qiyah" which means dissimulation. He seems a bit too clever to be Arabic Al-Qaeda (the latter can scarcely hide their barbarous violence). I suspect he's an agent of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The IRI's intelligence machine is a very well-funded and their methods of infiltration are entirely based those of the old KGB.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at December 20, 2006 06:22 PM (vixLB)
5
... Oh yeah, and note his choice of pseudo-nym "John Ryan" an imaginationless modification of "Jack Ryan" from Tom Clancy's novels. In other words, this "John Ryan" sees himself as a super spy sort of thing. This narcissism itself is another characteristic of Islamo-fascists in general and of the IRI agents in particular.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at December 20, 2006 06:37 PM (vixLB)
Busted, Disgusted, And Can Not Be Trusted
Greg at the Political Pit Bull has the skinny on a Pakistani ISI agent with possible Al Qaeda ties being arrested by Afghan authorities.
1
The "Taliban" thing was (as far as I know) originally an ISI creation. I expected that it was only a matter of time before the so-called "key ally in War on Terrorism" ie Pakistani agents were caught red-handed. And now they are. I'm very curious about the exact reaction of NATO/coalition commanders to this arrest!
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at December 19, 2006 05:42 PM (vixLB)
One of the Asian news outlets has been putting forth some very strong information that made me expect this would happen eventually.
I think it was the 'Asian Times'.
Anyway, the ISI has been apparently involved with Al-Q and other terror groups in other cases, and its uncertain whether the pakistani Government really has any control over the agents in question.
I know some stories from India like to heap blame on the Paki-Gov, but that may be partly bias. I guess we will find out more.
Thanks again.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 19, 2006 10:58 PM (2OHpj)
4
I thought that all agents of the ISI had al Qaeda ties...
Posted by: jeff m at December 20, 2006 09:24 AM (Sj38w)
Taliban’s New "Humane" Methods
Normally the Taliban behead a man for allowing his wife to teach girls evil satanic algebra. But in this case the Taliban were both merciful and creative, they spilled his guts out on the ground and then used motorbikes to draw and quarter him.
Independent News: The gunmen came at night to drag Mohammed Halim away from his home, in front of his crying children and his wife begging for mercy.
The 46-year-old schoolteacher tried to reassure his family that he would return safely. But his life was over, he was part-disembowelled and then torn apart with his arms and legs tied to motorbikes, the remains put on display as a warning to others against defying Taliban orders to stop educating girls.
Mr Halim was one of four teachers killed in rapid succession by the Islamists at Ghazni, a strategic point on the routes from Kabul to the south and east which has become the scene of fierce clashes between the Taliban and US and Afghan forces.
The day we arrived, an Afghan policemen and eight insurgents died during an ambush in an outlying village. Rockets were found, primed to be fired into Ghazni City during a visit by the American ambassador a few days previously.
But, as in the rest of Afghanistan, it is the civilians who are bearing the brunt of this conflict. At the village of Qara Bagh, the family of Mr Halim are distraught and terrified. His cousin, Ahmed Gul, shook his head: "They killed him like an animal. No, no. We do not kill animals like that, it would be haram. They took away a father and a husband, they had no pity. We are all very worried. Please go now, you see those men standing over there? They are watching. It is dangerous for you, and for us."
Fatima Mushtaq, the director of education at Ghazni, has had repeated death threats, the notorious "night letters". Her gender, as well as her refusal to send girls home from school, has made her a particular source of hatred for Islamist zealots.
"I think they killed him that way to frighten us, otherwise why make a man suffer so much? Mohammed Halim and his family were good friends of ours and we are very, very upset by what has happened. He came to me when the threats first began and asked what he should do. I told him to move somewhere safe. I think he was trying to arrange that when they came and took him," she said.
"I think they killed him that way to frighten us", Well yes that is what terrorists do because educating women is against Islam, or at least the Taliban’s interpretation of the ROP. And our choke…ally…cough Pakistan wants NATO to abandon the fight against these murderers?
Posted by: n.a. palm at November 29, 2006 03:16 PM (Dm8gn)
2
HERE'S WHY THE TALIBAN HAVE TO GET TOUGH: Here's a good pic of a vicious Canadian Crusader, in the midst of perpetrating horrible crimes on children: http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/_images/potd/AR2006-M011-0032.jpg Dirty infidel... This pic shows why Muslims must fight the Canadians to the very death, and why the Main Stream Media must help the Muslims do this.
Posted by: DemocracyRules at November 29, 2006 03:44 PM (+WNUd)
3
NO WINTER SLEEP FOR TALIBAN Canadian military is SO intimidated by Taliban threat to fight in Winter! Soldiers will HATE roaring around on skidoos fitted with 0.50 cal machine guns, chasing easy-to-find heat signatures, snow footprints, etc.
Posted by: DemocracyRules at November 29, 2006 03:49 PM (+WNUd)
Canadian War Crimes?
Thanks to Fred Fry in the comments, we get this gem of an article from Canada's Globe and Mail. It's worth reading the whole thing.
Like Fred posted, this excerpt is particularly interesting:
"If we attack the Canadians, they call for aircraft and bomb everything in the area. The U.S. only tried to kill the Taliban. The Canadians try to kill everybody."
Here's what I see. I see a group of savvy media manipulators trying to get out the message that Canadian troops are even worse than American troops.
I see an attempt to shock what they obviously view as a far more compliant population of media watchers into erupting into protest. I also see an attempt to replicate in Canada what we will soon see here. Hearings, subpoenas, and a general bogging down of the war effort.
I also see desperation. Unlike Iraq, Afghanistan is pretty much off the political radar in the U.S. The Pelosis and Murthas aren't calling for withdrawal from Afghanistan.
So all these losers have left is trying to convince the populations of our NATO allies that they, like us barbaric Americans, are nothing more than blood soaked oppressive butchers. A lame attempt to replicate the propaganda from Iraq.
Sorry, chums. Canada is even more hard to rouse from slumber than we are, but when we get together in a war, you're screwed.
I'll go out on a limb and guess that there's far more Canadians taking pride that their boys are bombing you into the Stone Age than not.
The CBC floats the "out of Afghanistan" balloon every once in a while and so far they have had to slither back to their "Bush is evil" stories in defeat.
Today I could have sworn I heard the morning news announcer reminisce back to the election of the "cool and sexy Pierre Trudeau". Even by our standards, hell even by the CBC's standards that is creepy.
Next they will be airing Gay Porn by Karl Marx impersonators on their TV channel.
Posted by: Chuck at November 29, 2006 08:22 AM (XwT2T)
3
It is generally a rule of thumb not to mess with a pissed off Canadian:
The Canadians, initially held in reserve, realized the only place with fresh air would be near the German lines, as the winds would blow the gas away from there. The Canadians fought through using urine-soaked handkerchiefs as primitive gas masks. Although the battle was considered a stalemate, the act of reestablishing the front lines in such harsh conditions earned the Canadians much respect and foreshadowed their use later in the war as assault troops.
Basically, the Huns gassed them, so they pissed on their hankies and kicked and kicked some German butt.
Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at November 29, 2006 09:25 AM (oC8nQ)
4
Great analysis. I wonder whose aircraft are doing the actual bombing......
Posted by: Fred Fry at November 29, 2006 11:04 AM (JXdhy)
5
The people of Afghanistan have historically never welcomed foreigners unless on their own terms. I am unconvinced as to the effectiveness of air power in a counterinsurgency war. For those who think that the war is going well there I can post links to three article with quotes from the Nato commander. #1 Afghanistan close to anarchy. http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,,1826303,00.html #2 Assistant to the commander quits saying campaign "is a textbook case of how to screw up a counter-insurgency" http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2350795,00.html #3 Top Nato commander says time is running out in Afghanistan, 70% of the population may support the Taliban in 6 months http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1009/dailyUpdate.html
One of the questions that I have been unable to answer using google is "How do you tell which of the dead people were Taliban?"
Posted by: John Ryan at November 29, 2006 12:17 PM (TcoRJ)
6"I'll go out on a limb and guess that there's far more Canadians taking pride that their boys are bombing you" Proud and grateful! I for one see them heroes who offer themselves as living Scarifice to God, Queen and Canada.
"but when we get together in a war, you're screwed." Yes, quite literally in fact. I am getting the impression that lately the trend has been for the Canadians to go out and pick a fight with the Taliban who tries to get himself reinforced; at which point the Canucks ask for air support from the U.S. air assets who then dutifully pulverize the enemy.
"Canada is even more hard to rouse from slumber than we are" Vinnie, there was time when the reverse was true. Canada entered WWII in 1939 and the U.S. in 1941.
Best /GM
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at November 29, 2006 04:01 PM (vixLB)
There is no war in Afghanistan. The dead Taliban are the ones killed while trying to disembowel, and draw and quarter schoolteachers.
Give up your propaganda war on the internet and go join them. Go earn your 72 raisins.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 29, 2006 07:43 PM (bLPT+)
8
canuck power is on the rise. steven harper has the stones - finally a prime minister with the guts to choose a side and the right one at that. hoser-donut-couch slugs get up and salute your troops.
Posted by: ben at November 29, 2006 09:56 PM (+apwv)
Afghanistan is suffering its heaviest insurgent attacks since a U.S.-led military force toppled the Taliban in late 2001 for harboring Al Qaeda leader Usama bin Laden.
Remember my post about Hamid Mir appearing on Beck's show?
Was warned to not embed with NATO troops in Afghanistan anymore.
There is no timeframe for any attacks, inside U.S. or Afghanistan. Backs up 300 suicide bomber claim by saying that shortly after he returned to Pakistan, suicide attacks began in Afghanistan, which is true.
Most of these attacks have, indeed, been suicidal. The title of the post is "dig deep." If you follow the news, you don't have to dig too far.
So, based on this, should we ascribe credibility upon Hamid Mir?
Not necessarily.
But, it's not paranoia if they're really out to get you.
1
We are not paranoid, and they are out to get us.
Posted by: Dr. Jeff at October 03, 2006 12:37 AM (92O+3)
2
Hamid Mir does not at all look trustworthy to me. Yes, he interviewed Usama. That means he's Usama's choice of interviewer, but that's all it means.
"Afghanistan has suffered its heaviest insurgent attacks since ... 2001" is not how I would describe this summer's wipeout of the Taliban, which is in preparation for NATO's takeover from CFC-Afghanistan.
Posted by: Vancouver at October 03, 2006 04:06 AM (prsdR)
A Gift for Mr. Bush
A man who was persecuted under Taliban rule in Afghanistan sends the fruit of his labor as a gift to President Bush. The gift is a thank you for helping to liberate him from that intolerant Islamic regime. Under the Taliban harassment and murder of the Hazara was a popular pass time.
The Southern Illiniosan: MARION(IL) - Grayson Gile may have completed his broader mission in Afghanistan as a member of the Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force, but he returned stateside with a mission of a more personal nature.
Gile's mission - one he chose to embrace - involves a very special rug handcrafted by an Afghan man anxious to show his gratitude to President George W. Bush for this country's efforts to bring democracy to Afghanistan.
The colorful and beautifully crafted rug was hand-knotted by an elderly Hazara man from Kabul. The Hazaras, believed to be descendants of Ghengis Khan, were one of the most persecuted ethnic minorities in the Middle Eastern country prior to the U.S.-backed Northern Alliance's war with the Taliban.
Posted by: Good Lt at July 18, 2006 01:20 PM (jWYAe)
3
I thought so too. And handmade. Can you say Antiques Roadshow 2050?
Posted by: Howie at July 18, 2006 01:21 PM (D3+20)
4
I'll venture that when it reaches the hands of our President, it will be displayed on the walls of the private residence of the White House. It will be a constant reminder of why he continues to bare the weight of the GWOT. This rug will become a center piece in the Bush home after her retires in January 2009.
It will not be sold as an antique in 2050 or any other time... Ever!
It's too precious.
Posted by: Derek at July 18, 2006 02:58 PM (U1eEW)
5
Antiques roadshow only appraises stuff. People bring stuff it to show off and get an appraisal for free Monday nights 8:00 edt PBS. sorry I guess Feisty and I are the only Roadshow fans around here.
Last night there was an old carpet on there. The old woman reminded me of my Grandma when she got her estimate of 25g's., "Oh my." she said.
Posted by: Howie at July 18, 2006 03:07 PM (D3+20)
6
Wow. I don't know what to say other than - that's awesome.
Posted by: Oyster at July 18, 2006 03:53 PM (cJvIk)
7
It's comes complete with a Jesus in heaven, some American flags, Bush, and some lions. I'm so envious. What's with the lions though?
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at July 18, 2006 06:13 PM (8e/V4)
8
Sybolic representation of Bush and that one norther alliance general that got blown up by the "journalists" with the camera bomb I think.
Posted by: Howie at July 18, 2006 07:45 PM (D3+20)
9
Wow, what a great story, but an even greater gift. The human spirit is still a wonderful thing to behold. Thank you, man from Afghanistan, for making my day.
Posted by: jesusland joe at July 18, 2006 09:44 PM (rUyw4)
but if he'd covered it in elephant shit and hung bloody tampons from it you'd be cheering it as pure genius. I guess there's no accounting for moonbat taste.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at July 18, 2006 11:14 PM (8e/V4)
12
That just goes to show that people do appreciate what the US is doing to help them, and that it bugs the hell out of liberals when this happens.
Posted by: pivalleygirl at July 19, 2006 01:11 AM (BQRI6)
13
What the hell are you babbling about tampons and elephant dung?WTF?...HAHAHAHAHA...Oh man, it's just one punch line after the other.
And WTF is Bush doing dressed as a catholic priest?
HAhahahahahaha...Freaking exoorcist?....
Posted by: mighty7 at July 19, 2006 06:08 AM (qc/Hi)
14
Mighty7: Eat shit and bark at the moon. Thats what the rest of the dogs do.
Posted by: greyrooster at July 19, 2006 06:37 AM (XuA/R)
15
Don't worry Rooster this guy will end up in line at the roadshow behind this rug. His jawa will drop at the value of the carpet. While his autographed photo of Michael Moore with Cindy Sheehan that he uses every night will be worth about 30 cents.
Posted by: Howie at July 19, 2006 10:16 AM (D3+20)
16
"And WTF is Bush doing dressed as a catholic priest?"
Okay, so the maker's theology is a bit off kilter. I think his heart is in the right place.
Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at July 19, 2006 12:53 PM (gZnyq)
17
Real nice quilt would look great in the SMITHSONIAN
Posted by: sandpiper at July 19, 2006 10:54 PM (M9D/B)
18
Only try to understand the Hazara (Mongol) man's final desire to show his inner feelings. That man knows who made Taliban and who destroyed it but he also knows that such thing would not happen in future again. So he just thanks for what happened to Talibs at the end. Understand!!!
Scores of Taliban Killed in Heavy Fighting
(Kandahar, Afghanistan) In unusually heavy fighting yesterday in southeastern Afghanistan, the Taliban suffered appropriately heavy losses.
Some of the fiercest violence since the Taliban's ouster in 2001 erupted across southern Afghanistan, with militants battling U.S. and Canadian forces, detonating car bombs and attacking a small village. Up to 105 people were killed, officials said Thursday.
Much of the violence occurred in the southern provinces of Helmand and Kandahar, where thousands of extra NATO troops are scheduled to deploy this summer to counter an increasing number of attacks from a stubborn insurgency.
The Taliban death toll from fighting Wednesday night and Thursday ranged up to 87, U.S. and Afghan officials said. Also, 15 Afghan police officers, one American civilian, a Canadian soldier and an Afghan civilian were killed in the attacks.
The attacks are considered to be the largest by the Taliban since 2001 and, based upon media reports, I'd say the aggressors took it in the shorts.
Notably, the Afghan National Police (ANP) demonstrated its ability to make the Taliban flee during the attack on government headquarters in Musa Qala in Helmand province. According to British military spokesman, Capt. Drew Gibson, the British helped evacuate casualties and let the ANP forces do the fighting to prove their abilities. I'm happy to relate that their performance was assessed as admirable.
1
That Canadian casualty was a female Captain, tough loss.
Kevin
Posted by: Unclemeat at May 18, 2006 01:10 PM (9KbTL)
2
Even when the MSM reports positive news about the war on terror, they screw up (or slant) the details. This AP story makes it sound like additional NATO troops are being dispatched to counter a resurgent Taliban. BS. The NATO takeover from the US in the south of Afghanistan was planned and documented over a year ago, and is proceeding as scheduled. And the primary reason for the increased fighting in the south is a change in strategy by the coalition which kicked off with "Operation Mountain Lion" several weeks back, a series of offensives in the southern provinces designed to draw the Taliban out into open firefights, where they invariably get their martyrdoms conferred in large numbers.
Posted by: geobandy at May 18, 2006 03:10 PM (5jnES)
3
Wow, another tough military defeat for the leftards. I want to hear Murtha and other piece-O-shit traitors talk more about how we're losing.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 18, 2006 04:32 PM (0yYS2)
4
Does anybody else bother to use the links provided ? IM did you bother to read the whole article in the ContrCosta Times ? The Taliban attacked in a group of between 300 to 400. ummm Any cause for alarm in this ? Are the opposing forces stronger and more numerous than they were 2 years ago or one year ago ? Preliminary estimates so far this yearz point to still another record busting opium crop. IM in this type of conflict what do you think the best way of measuring "winning" or "losing" is ? A body count ?
Posted by: john Ryan at May 18, 2006 05:08 PM (TcoRJ)
5
300-400 apparently isn't enough. And yes we read the links provided. But just a little poking around on the net will reveal the information geobandy graciously provided, as the article so blatantly omits and you prefer to ignore. Articles like this are the result of "journalists" breaking news down into seemingly unrelated bits to make the bigger picture harder to see.
--------------------------------
Wouldn't it be a great day when the radical Muslims in the Middle East start undermining their jihadi troops with defeatist attitudes, bad press and harping on their every misstep while marching in the streets with signs saying OsamaBinChimpyHitler?
Oh wait ... that's our side.
Posted by: Oyster at May 18, 2006 06:43 PM (YudAC)
6
John, Just because you're a liberal, and thus a coward, and piss your pants at the mere thought of having to fight like a man, doesn't mean everyone else is. So what if they can cobble together three or four hundred? It just makes it easier to kill them. I'd like to see them get a few thousand together in one place so our guys can kill that many more. You liberals are just gutless, chickenshit cowards.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 19, 2006 04:56 AM (0yYS2)
7
A motion to extend Canada's deployment in Afghanistan barely passed 149 to 145 Wednesday night. The NDP ( near communist pro Castro anti America), Bloc Quebecois and most Liberals (anti American socialists), including key leadership candidates voted against it.
...Former Liberal prime minister Paul Martin was absent.
The vote is a political victory for prime minister Stephen Harper, who can characterize the result as an indication of the will of Parliament, while exposing divisions within the Liberal ranks.
Posted by: Dave K at May 19, 2006 05:10 AM (YaR8u)
8
TBH- I can't beleave the Afghan resistance has gone on as long as it has. Incredible. The deaths reported however were not all Taliban. It started a day prior with US troops opening fire on a group of protestors throwing stones at the US Consolate's motorcade. One thing begot another and a riot broke out the following day. The appearance of the Taliban is was just thier attempts to take advantage of the situation. They fled when they were engaged and unfortunately during this chaos most of the rioters were assumed to be Taliban and probably shot on sight.
To be blunt however, I really don't know how they would have been treated even if they were recognized to be simple enraged protestors. Thier law enforcement still opperates in a state of martial law.
I am very curious to know what the Taliban was going after while the cat was away. Any details released as to thier various objectives?
Posted by: Calist at May 19, 2006 05:29 AM (dybt/)
9
Well IM I post under my real name and my address is 250 105th Street. If I am home my motorcycle will be parked out front. Perhaps you might consider posting under your real name. . Here is another link that says that although 40 Taliban were reported killed only 14 bodies were recovered. As I posted before, proper analysis can only be done in an absence of emotion. http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=691678 IM as you probably are aware many people think that the worst insults that we can imagine are what we may think of as our own weaknesses.
Posted by: john ryan at May 19, 2006 09:23 AM (TcoRJ)
10
Hmmm. We kicked ass so bad in Vietnam and Somalia and are kicking ass so bad in Afghanistan and Iraq that we should immediately storm Iran!
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 19, 2006 09:32 AM (FCC6c)
11
Typical MSM spin. We kick Taliban ass, and that's evidence we're losing the war.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 19, 2006 12:21 PM (8e/V4)
12
Carlos MSM has only one agenda.... that is profit. MSM is a multi multi billion dollar industry. As for kicking ass in Afghanistan The attack on the town of MusaQala by a force of 300-400 Taliban resulted in about an even number of confirmed dead on both sides. The Afghan government claimed to have killed another 25 Taliban but had no other bodies to show, My personal standard is How many weapons were recovered ? http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=691678 I am very skeptical of ANY news story coming from the mideast, especially so from Afghanistan. Journalists and aid workers can not go out into the countryside to find out what is really going on. I always try to follow as many links as I can to try to get a more complete story.
Posted by: john ryan at May 19, 2006 01:30 PM (TcoRJ)
13
John, you're a liberal, and are thus safe to post your specifics because we evil conservatives and libertarians don't stalk people. I honestly don't give a damn where you live, but I don't want any stupid leftards knowing where I live, because flayed corpses and heads on pikes have to be explaned to the authorities, and I just don't have the patience.
Now please explain how killing the enemy is causing us to lose the war...
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 19, 2006 02:46 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 19, 2006 06:43 PM (FCC6c)
15
John Ryan: Have your muslim boyfriend use vaseline next time and it won't hurt so much. Thx for the address. I have some friends in the Bronx who will be by for your motorcycle. Second thought, its probably, a pink vespa.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 19, 2006 08:05 PM (AWtJU)
16
Hey Asshole: I just cross referenced your address. Your full of shit.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 19, 2006 08:08 PM (AWtJU)
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 19, 2006 10:15 PM (FCC6c)
21
No the bike is black a 1983 BMW I have owned it since 1988. Google maps have areal nice pic of my apartment building try looking there. As for you having friends in the Bronx always happy to meeet new people. They can also find me at my favorite bar Tap a Keg on Broadway between 105th and 104th. When can I expect them ?
Posted by: john Ryan at May 19, 2006 10:46 PM (TcoRJ)
22
Grey-dick-roost? What the hell kind of putdown is that? It doesn't even make bad sense! You made me read that drivel? Dammit boy, you can do better than that.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 19, 2006 10:57 PM (0yYS2)
23
IM I can not explain to you whether we are winning the war .... or losing the war. I can point out what I see are misconceptions about how other people are reaching those conclusions. Such questions as are the enemy gaining strength or losing strength ? When a force of 300-400 attack and hold a town for 8 hours and leave behind 15 bofies I can not see this as a great victory against the Taliban.
Posted by: john Ryan at May 19, 2006 11:00 PM (TcoRJ)
24
just a little cock fight with greydickroost, IM, so butt out! Go pick your own fight!
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 19, 2006 11:04 PM (FCC6c)
25
John, you need to read up on military strategy and tactics. Try Sun Tzu's Art of War, anything written by Vo Nguyen Giap, Mao's rehash of Art of War, and Clausewitz, if you can handle all the big words. There are lots of other good authors out there, so spend a little time learning about war before you talk about it. Here's a free lesson: Attacking an undefended town and holding it temporarily before getting beaten out of it can not be construed as a victory, or even a break-even, by any stretch of the imagination, no matter how badly you want the enemy to win. You're impressed by the fact that they could assemble three hundred terrorists to fight in one place at one time, and see it as a sure sign of victory, whereas our military sees three hundred enemies on the battlefield as a good day's hunting. People like you have never, do not now, and will never in the future win wars or protect civilization, or anyone for that matter, and your behavior is cowardly and unmanly, therefore your opinion doesn't matter.
Larry, you went to a public school, didn't you? It shows.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 20, 2006 07:44 AM (0yYS2)
26
Wherever I went to school one thing I learned was to call the BS as I see it!
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 20, 2006 08:56 AM (FCC6c)
27
>>>Carlos MSM has only one agenda.... that is profit. MSM is a multi multi billion dollar industry.
john,
on the contrary, there is little interference by the tychoons, and the Liberal editors and reporters have great leeway in their job as long as they still sell papers.
Nine out of ten MSM reporters are self-described Liberals who went into journalism to "make the world a better place". Translated, they have an agenda and it's Leftwing. They try not to be too obvious about it, but they truly can't help themselves. Come election time, however, they stop pretending entirely. It's a truism among Republican strategists that the Dems have a built-in handicap of about 10-15 percentage points over the GOP because of this MSM slant. You'd have to be blind, or a Liberal, not to see it.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 20, 2006 06:49 PM (8e/V4)
28
You call BS as you see it huh? Must be hell avoiding mirrors like that if you want to get anything done in the day other than standing around yelling BULLSHIT!!!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 21, 2006 07:55 AM (0yYS2)
29
Today Sunday Fox news is also reporting 9 killed in the big battle the one with 300-400 Taliban http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,196360,00.html IM the town was defended. The attacking force seems to have lost 4-5 % If the Afghan government is seen by the inhabitants of that town as being unable to provide security then it will be a victory for the Taliban. Thank you for your reading suggestions Clausweitz seems a little for Afghanistan. My favorite precept in the Art of War was "Don't fight a battle you can not win"
Posted by: john Ryan at May 21, 2006 04:50 PM (sLN29)
30
The people of the United States have a choice in where they go for news. They have a choice in what newspapers to buy. Has anyone noticed a change in Fox's reporting of late (6 months) as the polls show what the feelings of the USA are in regards to the war ?
Posted by: john Ryan at May 21, 2006 04:56 PM (sLN29)
31"...as the polls show what the feelings of the USA are in regards to the war ?"
I wonder what the polls showed in Nazi Germany in the 30s? Is right and wrong determined by the simple virtue of numbers? Where is the reasoning that because more people are on one side than another, that the larger group is more equitable?
Posted by: Oyster at May 22, 2006 05:34 AM (YudAC)
Two Taliban Commanders Killed
(Kandahar, Afghanistan) Two Taliban commanders were among 11 enemy killed by Afghan police during fighting in the Panjwai District about 20 miles west of Kandahar. According to Mohammad Daoud Ahmadi, spokesman for the Kandahar provincial governor, the battle was a big victory even though five policemen were killed.
Ahmadi said among the 11 Taliban killed was a provincial-level commander, Mullah Abdul Baqi, and a district-level commander, Mullah Abdul Manan.
Manan was responsible for a spate of attacks, including suicide bomb blasts, rocket attacks and the burning of several schools, Ahmadi said.
The Taliban reportedly took eight bodies with them when they fled, leaving three stinking carcasses. The fighting, lasting for four hours, started after Afghan police received a tip that Taliban were in the area. A patrol was then sent to attack. Notably, only Afghan policemen were engaged in the operation. Although it was a minor skirmish, I think it indicates that Afghan forces are capable of imposing government control over the countryside.
1
hmmmm. very interesting. After the village was surrounded the taliban fled carrying 8 bodies, but decided to leave behind their two top commanders. )?) As for the government being able to control the countryside. They are not even close to doing that. The main road from Kandahar to Kabul is not under control. They are expecting yet another record year in opium production, which is helping to finance the insurgents. We have not been able to prevent the entire western part of Pakistan from becoming a sanctuary. http://story.malaysiasun.com/p.x/ct/9/cid/b8de8e630faf3631/id/cd9b3635aaaeb890/ isee our position at this time in Afghanistan as being no better than a stalemate.
Posted by: john Ryan at May 15, 2006 09:00 AM (TcoRJ)
2
Based on our success stories in Afghanistan and Iraq and Vietnam and Somalia, we should go into Iran and really clean house! Nuke these God-forsaken lands and be done with it!
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 15, 2006 01:01 PM (FCC6c)
Canadians Stomp Taliban
Ealier today I had this link saying coalition forces stomped 20 Taliban into the ground.
Guardian UK : KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (AP) - Coalition forces killed between 15 and 20 militants in fighting over the weekend in the southern Afghan province of Helmand, the U.S. military said Monday.
A coalition patrol on Saturday attacked militants carrying assault rifles and grenade launchers, who were ``moving with the intent to set up an ambush'' in the province's Sangin district, a military statement said.
No coalition forces were hurt, it said.
This afternoon I have more detail, it was the Canadians who spotted and destroyed this Taliban unit.
Reuters :"Our convoy using night-vision optics on their vehicle were able to see three vehicles preparing for an ambush," Canadian spokesman Major Marc Theriault said of the Saturday night clash.
The convoy was travelling to a remote base in the Sangin district of Helmand province when the insurgents were spotted, he said.
Canadian forces attacked and destroyed the three vehicles which contained 15 to 20 insurgents, he said. No Canadians were hurt.
Go Canada and thanks for the help. Can you just imagine the Tailban commander. You mean Candians killed all our men? Surley Allah has forsaken us now. You bet he has Mullah Omar! May you eat hot Canadian lead very soon.
Updated : Canadians targeted by the enemy looking for revenge and thankfully none were injured. The terrorists did manage to murder one innocent old man though. Way to go Taliban murderers of helpless old men. Your cowardly method of attack reaps you shame.
Canada.com :KABUL (CP) - Three Canadian coalition members were hit by an improvised explosive device - or roadside bomb - near Kabul on Tuesday, but escaped without injury, the military said.
The unidentified attacker was driving a white car that exploded about 100 metres from the convoy, spraying shrapnel over a wide distance, Parwani said.
Several reports said Canadian soldiers were also involved in that attack, although none were injured.
Hey I'm not surprised the Canadians are tough. I used to watch the lumberjack competition on ABCWWS.
1
More proof that the Northern country gets a bad rap most of the time. I'm told that in 'United 93', we are reminded that Canada also allowed planes bound for the U.S. to land in their country on 9/11, not knowing if they had terrorists on them or not. Go Canada!
2
Its how Canadians used to be once upon a time before liberalism became the national mental disorder. We used to kick ass. I am one proud Canadian. I only wish they'd have their heads up on pikes.
Posted by: Darcey at May 01, 2006 05:44 PM (BVJ3o)
3
A little bit of Canadian bacon for our Islamist terroist friends.
4
Great news! Let's all sing the "Lumberjack Song"!
Posted by: hondo at May 01, 2006 07:40 PM (SeBrl)
5
Oh Canada, ...welcome back. We're so glad to see ya.
Let's send the insurgents cases of SPAM- they'll love it.
Posted by: Seanmahair at May 01, 2006 07:48 PM (Pncyg)
6
As much as we Americans like to make fun of our weaker northern neighbor, we forget that they're not completely toothless yet. My understanding of the situation (from those who pay attention to these things) is that the Canadians still have some of the best infantry forces in the world (man for man). If I recall correctly, at one point the Canadians were training Israeli infantry.
Posted by: Civilis at May 01, 2006 07:56 PM (4UUFN)
7
Well, Darcey, you don't have to feel bad about it, we are getting a big dose of it ourselves. Liberalism is the death of all societies. It kills the will to defend what is good from what is evil.
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 01, 2006 08:09 PM (rUyw4)
8
Thats maybe becuase the candians voted to dump the liberals out of office
Posted by: sandpiper at May 01, 2006 09:54 PM (A09bm)
9
Since the liberals have been kicked out of office in Canada, wait patiently for things to improve guys, just wait and see, the islamists are losing their leftist supporters bit by bit.
Posted by: MathewK at May 01, 2006 10:26 PM (pVHqF)
10
Great!!! Even better if I could hear this from the MSM up here.
See how a change up there in Canada precipitated a change down here in the USA. No more Canada bashing from me, Canada rocks!
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 02, 2006 09:33 AM (rUyw4)
15
Canada has been fighting in Afghanistan since 2002. People just didn't head about it because Canada doesn't do the "shock and awe" thang.
Posted by: Venom at May 02, 2006 10:54 AM (dbxVM)
16
Canada still has its problems. While the Canadian military is in Afghanistan shootin' 'em up, Canada (at home) is busy enacting and spreading Sharia law.
Posted by: Oyster at May 02, 2006 01:25 PM (MKmyT)
18
I'm even going back to my favorite beer in the World, which is Moosehead, and pouring out that pee my wife buys me, which is Corona. In other words, Canada is in, Mexico is out!
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 03, 2006 09:17 AM (rUyw4)
19
Chris in Manitoba is right. It is not likely we are going to hear this sort of success reported in Canadian media.
In related news: Why do I have to read TurkishPress to hear about this?
Suspected tribal militants beheaded a cab driver in South Waziristan for being a "US spy" and a frequent visitor to an American military base in Afghanistan, official sources told Daily Times on Wednesday.
The body of the man, identified as Khan Mati, was found on Tuesday near Angoor Ada, the last Pakistani town before the Afghan border in South Waziristan, sources said.
Mati, who had been missing since April 17, was believed to be a frequent traveller to the US military base in Macha Dadkot in Paktika province in Afghanistan. He is the second taxi driver to be abducted and killed in Angoor Ada over suspicion of being a US spy.
Sources said that Haji Omar, the Taliban chief in South Waziristan, said that "we do not waste bullet on such suspects and prefer beheading them."
In my mind, the Taliban terrorists are murdering scum with no chance of redemption. Those poor cabbies were likely only trying to go with the flow and put food on the table for their families. Instead, they're murdered by Taliban fanatics.
And, all the while, Sen. Dick Durbin claims the U.S. is the bad guy and Yale University recruits students from the Taliban. The leftists have turned America into bizarro world.
1
IP you seem to overlook the most important thing about the ex(?) Taliban student. It Is not that he was accepted into one of the most prestigous institutions of higher learning in the entire country, it was that the Federal Government allowed him entry into the United States. I don't care if he was going to some no name community college, I DON'T WANT HIM HERE
Posted by: john Ryan at April 28, 2006 08:36 PM (TcoRJ)
2
John- It's even worse. Yale actively recruited him! This moron doesn't even have the equivalent of a GED. Furthermore, this SOB filled a slot that a MUCH more qualified student was denied. What crap.
Posted by: Mark at April 28, 2006 09:09 PM (VZyOx)
3
>>>The leftists have turned America into bizarro world.
Indeed. But it's so gradual that folks hardly notice it happenning. Suddenly things are just fucked up and people wonder why. BECAUSE LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER, THAT'S WHY.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 28, 2006 11:38 PM (M3nr/)
4
Mark- Yale says he's not in a degree program, so it's not clear that he's taking someone's slot. What Yale sees in him is anyone's guess, but for my part I'd guess they just want him on hand because he's an interesting specimen. They'd probably enroll a Thuggee too, if any were available.
As to the the viciousness of the Taliban, you guys give them too much credit. The Afghans have been gut-spilling fiends before the Taliban was ever heard of. Or Islam, for that matter. Because our soldiers are among them we've just got a front-row seat to the same behavior the Sovs saw before us, and the Brits before them, and so on back to the days of Alexander.
Posted by: ShannonKW at April 29, 2006 01:58 AM (dT1MB)
5
john ryan: You can stop tooting that horn. We got it. It's of concern too. It's obviously not policy. Someone slipped him in under the radar and we all hope s/he gets caught. How do you know they're not looking for who got him in the US or that they haven't already found him/her and reprimanded them? The "real" problem is our educational institutions who compete to get these thugs. If they hadn't wanted him and if the guy out west hadn't lobbied to get him here, his name never would have appeared at the State Department for approval. Supply and demand.
Senator John Cornyn is all over this. He wants to review Hashemi's visa. Let's wait and see if he's able to get to the bottom of it.
Posted by: Oyster at April 29, 2006 05:06 AM (YudAC)
6
Anyone have any ideas how many FBI agents are watching the Taliban man -- or how many taps are on his phone? Sometimes things aren't what they seem.
Agree with the animals part, they warrant extinction as the final solution.
The war goes on, at least for half of the country.
Posted by: bill at April 29, 2006 05:32 AM (7evkT)
7
Bill, given past performance, the odds of the FBI even knowing about his presence in the country are pretty slim. The entire Federal government needs to be dismantled.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 30, 2006 07:29 AM (0yYS2)