December 06, 2006
Posted by: Ragnar at
02:45 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
Honestly I think the police were requested because the truth is the Imams don't trust their own Muslim men around all that sweetness.
If the police are present, the uncovered meat has 'cover', if you know what I mean.
Call me a sexist, but I'm a little worried for safety of the ladies.
Lets wish them luck!
And thanks for the detailed post Ragnar
USA all the way
Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 06, 2006 03:09 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Pastorius at December 06, 2006 06:24 AM (NGP73)
Posted by: Oyster at December 06, 2006 06:33 AM (YudAC)
If people in the US generally had any clue about what Shar'ia was all about, we'd have that kind of stuff going on here too. (Except it's a little chilly right now).
Posted by: Farmer Joe at December 06, 2006 09:30 AM (vKn4M)
December 05, 2006
Posted by: Ragnar at
09:51 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Good Lt at December 06, 2006 07:24 AM (D0TMh)
Posted by: Randman at December 06, 2006 08:07 AM (Sal3J)
Posted by: Gwedd at December 06, 2006 02:39 PM (pDOVp)
He's also mad as a hatter.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at December 06, 2006 05:44 PM (VvXII)
From Breitbart.com:
"I love the English lifestyle, it's not as capitalistic as America. People don't talk about work and money, they talk about interesting things at dinner," she told "NS," the weekend magazine supplement of daily Portuguese newspaper Diario de Noticias on Saturday.She added that she loves living in London because Madonna is her neighbor. "She's like an older sister" who gives her "good advice.""I like living here because I don't fit into the bad side of American psychology. The British are much more intelligent and civilized than the Americans," the 34-year-old added.
But, oops! In another report, Paltrow now denies she said anything anti-American and blames the quotes on poor Spanish language skills she demonstrated during a press conference.
So, who does one believe? As I recall, Paltrow has a history of being quite the liberal elitist. Therefore, I'll believe she did diss the U.S. After all, it is the trendy liberal thing to do.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:29 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 182 words, total size 2 kb.
I obviously never entered her mind that the difference is more likely a change in circle of friends and less likely a difference in country. Yeah, she probably took a dump on the US.
Posted by: Buzzy at December 05, 2006 09:35 AM (CXz7T)
...she was quoted saying almost the exact same things in an interview with the Guardian eleven months ago:
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/filmandmusic/story/0,,1695252,00.html
"I love the
English way, which is not as capitalistic as it is in America. People
don't talk about work and money; they talk about interesting things at
dinner parties. I like living here because I don't tap into the bad
side of American psychology, which is 'I'm not achieving enough, I'm
not making enough, I'm not at the top of the pile.' It's just kind of
like, I am."
So, no, I don't buy it either. Seems her Spanish is pretty good.
Posted by: Oyster at December 05, 2006 09:38 AM (SCVhh)
Posted by: Prof.Xomox at December 05, 2006 09:58 AM (t+69P)
Has she not noticed the flood of English going to Florida to buy cheap property? to New York, Los Angeles etc. - to buy cheap goods ? She is too stupid to even realize her own privileged position in life.
She probably thinks that if peasants have no bread they should just eat cake.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at December 05, 2006 10:57 AM (EMsfe)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at December 05, 2006 11:00 AM (vBK4C)
maybe folks will realize these elite snobs are really just dumb and dismiss everything said not related to themselves and their particular form of entertainment.
Posted by: Barry 0351 at December 05, 2006 11:09 AM (rqlgb)
Americans are uncivilized, mostly because Civilized now means passifistic and cowardly. We are also less intelligent, because we don't see the "obvious truths" that certain people see.
The entire thing is a tempest in a teakettle. This is nowhere near Mel, Alec Baldwin, or even Michael Moore quality meltdown. Honestly, her perspective isn't even insulting because she made it clear she was talking about "the Bad Side" of American psychology. I know a lot of rich people who are exactly the way she describes them. She's not describing the average American, who is much more intelligent and civilized than the average "old money" or "noveau riche" fop.
Posted by: Berkeley Non-Conformist at December 05, 2006 11:18 AM (7+kQQ)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at December 05, 2006 11:18 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: slug at December 05, 2006 12:57 PM (1RTvd)
are so much more superior than dinner converstion in the US.
Please. What one likes to talk about and what they don't is a
matter of taste and what is important to the individual. For this
twit to claim that there is some "bad" psychology here that she so
needs to escape is to deny that there is "bad" psychology everywhere.
If her circle of friends didn't consist of Hollywood leftists and her
husband's band friends, she might have found far more interesting
dinner guests. Her father is a director and her mother is Blythe
Danner so she was born with the proverbial silver spoon in her
mouth. Maybe she's just raging against the establishment she was
born into. But to project her disappointments with her own caste
onto the US as a whole in interviews is childish and ignorant.
English snob: "I declare Americans are so boorish."
Paltrow: "Oh my, you're so interesting!" [titter titter]
Posted by: Oyster at December 05, 2006 01:56 PM (SCVhh)
Posted by: Jay at December 05, 2006 04:09 PM (wb6+m)
Maybe Gwyneth can discus those "interesting things" at her next dinner party. I'm sure everybody is tired of talking about why she's flakey enough to name her kid "Apple," and why a skank like her gets to be a movie star.
Gwyneth Paltrow is butt-ugly, inside and out. She should audition for a position in the Dixie Chicks.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 06, 2006 01:12 AM (bLPT+)
Britainistan because muslims, with their rigid sense of morality, won't
put up with a hedonistic Jewess like her running around uncovered,
committing all natures of sin. Lefturds will most assuredly get what
they deserve sooner or later.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 06, 2006 07:24 AM (v3I+x)
Berkley non comformist: Jealousy will get you nowhere,
I wonder where Madonna will live when Britishstan becomes a reality.
Posted by: Greyrooster at December 06, 2006 07:39 AM (ezJiI)
December 01, 2006
Michelle has everything else you need to know.
Posted by: Ragnar at
06:59 PM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: DAT at December 01, 2006 08:21 PM (vEiYY)
Posted by: ben at December 01, 2006 09:03 PM (+apwv)
Posted by: ben at December 01, 2006 09:04 PM (+apwv)
Posted by: sol at December 01, 2006 09:39 PM (lvaIO)
Posted by: Greyrooster at December 01, 2006 10:27 PM (BMcPj)
Posted by: Vinnie at December 02, 2006 01:04 AM (/qy9A)
Posted by: Randman at December 02, 2006 01:11 AM (Sal3J)
Type crotch into a search engine if you want to see how cheap this makes her. Like millions of similar images don't get spammed around the wide world every day.
It's sad. What is wrong with her?
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 02, 2006 02:57 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Buzzy at December 02, 2006 04:02 AM (CXz7T)
Thank you for sharing this story with me !
Posted by: Marina making pictures at December 02, 2006 06:13 AM (GIQTY)
Posted by: roguejew at December 02, 2006 08:06 AM (Vvgsg)
Posted by: Greyrooster at December 02, 2006 08:29 AM (0ZUKd)
Some stupid silly bitch showing her crotch for attention, am I supposed to care about this? With everything going on in the world today, does this really matter?
Am I supposed to care? Maybe I am, since its so important that Michelle Malkin made a stupid, inane, childish and pathetic video about it.
Obviously, I am completely out of touch with what's important in this world.
Posted by: LindaSoG at December 02, 2006 09:25 AM (GBBmd)
Well, I guess that's all it's good for, since the election.
So what's with posting crotch shots of women?
Are you really trying to make us believe that you don't prefer naked boys?
Posted by: PuddleDuck at December 02, 2006 09:29 AM (vbuTm)
Posted by: Ragnar, the All-Seeing Pirate at December 02, 2006 12:18 PM (5wWAf)
So...what was that "Google bait" that brought our esteemed colleague Puddle to this august forum....oh yeah...Menudo nude.
Posted by: St Peter at December 02, 2006 01:21 PM (Sal3J)
Do you see porn here? I don't.
So what's with posting crotch shots of women?
Do you see crotch shots here? I don't.
Pud, I think you're projecting.
Posted by: McGehee at December 02, 2006 01:25 PM (lAOTn)
Do you see crotch shots here? I don't.
Thats your mistake McGehee...you assume Puddle would know what a womens crotch looked like.
Posted by: Randman at December 02, 2006 04:24 PM (Sal3J)
Do you see porn here? I don't.
So what's with posting crotch shots of women?
Do you see crotch shots here? I don't.
Pud, I think you're projecting.
Posted by: McGehee at December 2, 2006 01:25 PM"
I'm sorry, you are right.
This is not becoming an internet porn site.
It is becoming a cyber sex site, since you guys are obsessed with talking about women's crotches.
Aren't the female Jawas a tad offended, by all of your talk about women's crotches or doesn't it bother them, because the are all lesbians?
Posted by: PuddleDuck at December 02, 2006 05:36 PM (jc5xq)
Posted by: TheAntiPuddleDuck at December 02, 2006 06:06 PM (jc5xq)
Posted by: Frank Booth at December 02, 2006 07:55 PM (rIWvK)
Posted by: Wormpaste at December 03, 2006 03:04 AM (XM56o)
Posted by: Greyrooster at December 03, 2006 10:26 AM (5vGBy)
Posted by: McGehee at December 03, 2006 09:41 PM (lAOTn)
Posted by: Greyrooster at December 04, 2006 06:12 AM (qWbYR)
November 28, 2006
Based on clinical work and analyses of more than 1,000 scientific studies, Dr. Brizendine's research found that "the simple act of talking triggers a flood of brain chemicals which give women a rush similar to that felt by heroin addicts when they get a high." It's not that way with us guys.
From TheRegister.co.uk:
Dr Luan Brizendine of the University of California, who's published her shock findings in The Female Brain, says the average woman works her way through 20,000 words per day, compared with just 7,000 for the average bloke. She says "women devote more brain cells to talking than men", and cites fundamental differences between male and female brains as the cause.According to "self-proclaimed feminist" Dr. Brizendine, the difference is explained by the level of testosterone in a person. The high level of testosterone in males suppresses those areas of the brain which control communication, emotion and memory.
Now, a logical conclusion would be that males have better listening skills than women. After all, if women are yakking most of the time, they can't be talking to other women since they, too, are yakking. Therefore, women must be talking to men and, as a result, men empirically are more adept at listening since they do it three times as much as women.
On the contrary, says Dr. Brizendine who runs a female "mood and hormone" clinic in San Francisco. According to her psychiatric feminist research, the testosterone in the male brain also shrinks the primary hearing cortex which makes them "deaf" to most logical arguments. However, the shrinkage in one area of the brain is compensated for by the expansion of the areas of the brain which control sexual thought processing.
Notably, not everyone concurs with Dr. Brizendine's assertions since there is no common agreement regarding testosterone's effect on the brain. Personally, I view the contention that women talk too much as about right, but it's ludicrous to label men as "deaf" to logic.
In summary, research found that women talk most of the time while men don't and the reason is that women don't have nasty testosterone to make them deaf and fiendish about sex.
Dr. Brizendine is reported to be affiliated with the University of California but in which capacity is unclear. Internet searches under 'psychobabble studies' and 'feminist psychiatric hooey' failed to return any useful results.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
08:43 AM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 424 words, total size 3 kb.
triggers a flood of brain chemicals which give women a rush similar to
that felt by heroin addicts when they get a high."
So if they are yapping while eating chocolate I guess their bodies go into orgasmic convulsions.
Posted by: Randman at November 28, 2006 09:58 AM (Sal3J)
Posted by: Darth Odie at November 28, 2006 10:03 AM (YdcZ0)
Lifetime channel crap to the cells of the terrorist prisoners and they
would be telling us everything.
Posted by: Randman at November 28, 2006 10:46 AM (Sal3J)
Posted by: RegularRon at November 28, 2006 12:11 PM (qZJTO)
Posted by: Darth Odie at November 28, 2006 12:14 PM (YdcZ0)
Posted by: No Fear at November 28, 2006 01:08 PM (ZQepB)
I must say though, I know a few men who can talk just as much, if not more than, women. They must have too much estrogen or something.
And as for men, we all know that while women prefer to express themselves verbally and logically, men prefer to express themselves through physical roughness. (see: Football, Rugby and WWE for examples)
Men are nothing but overdeveloped Neanderthals. They've developed something called "selective hearing" that enables them to block out our endless droning on about shoes, purses, emotions, weight issues and what so-and-so said about what's-her-face down the block last Tuesday. Personally, I can't blame them.
</sarcasm>
Posted by: Kelly at November 28, 2006 01:59 PM (2wtXk)
Posted by: Jane at November 28, 2006 02:44 PM (SCVhh)
Posted by: Randman at November 28, 2006 02:45 PM (dqn5Y)
Posted by: Oyster at November 28, 2006 02:45 PM (SCVhh)
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at November 28, 2006 03:08 PM (vixLB)
Because, granted, I was shooting for a point, but failed miserably in my execution...
Posted by: Kelly at November 28, 2006 04:03 PM (2wtXk)
Posted by: dick at November 28, 2006 04:26 PM (XlQVK)
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at November 28, 2006 06:42 PM (2bJJN)
Of course, being the female supremacist flake that she is, she's unaware that the harder a person's brain works on a simple task, the stupider that person is, and that jabbering is not communication.
I have to wonder what kind of advanced scientific method she used to prove her idiotic assertion that the "primary hearing cortex" (snort!) is atrophied in men. phrenology? Is this assertion an example of a woman's superior skill for logical argumentation?
I guess she's also the only woman on Earth who doesn't know why men tone out half of what women blather on about.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 28, 2006 08:13 PM (bLPT+)
I call that my man power. To tune out women and crying babies. Its a survival mechanism for both sides.
Posted by: Randman at November 28, 2006 08:52 PM (Sal3J)
Posted by: hadsil at November 29, 2006 12:04 AM (OeDQr)
No prob. My wife can read anything I do, and she uses more words in conversation as well.
All it means is that women invest more energy in detailed conversation.
Women and men are different, and that is an obvious and unavoidable truth. Its also nice.
The sexist interpretation of research runs both ways, and is better material for a joke, than it is for a real discussion of gender specialities.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 29, 2006 10:21 PM (2OHpj)
If women invest more energy in detailed conversation, why do men have to tell them everything at least twice, and why do they think the patience it takes to do this means we don't appreciate them? If they were good with details they would be able to read a map.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 30, 2006 12:25 AM (bLPT+)
Posted by: Mike at December 01, 2006 11:51 AM (YETV2)
Ladies use more words'
Lady= "You should have seeen the exquisite pink dress I found at 'Gibsons, you know, down by the golf course? Well anyway, as an accessory it comes with a lovely lemon colored sash, and I found a matching pair of shoes that complement the dress in just the perfect way! I was nearly in tears when I saw the price tag, but then I realized that we are having that yard sale on Saturday, and everything came together. you wouldn't have any issue with me getting that wondeful dress, if we make enough at the sale, would you?"
Gentleman = "So you found a pink dress and a belt and shoes that you like? And if we have the money you want to buy them? Sure, go ahead."
Lady = "But aren't you interested? The fabric was just ..."
Gentleman = "I said it was OK."
AND SO ON!
They invest more energy in detailed conversation. They don't process male bluntness as well as blunt males do. They get ticked of if your blunt because they don't think you care.
But of course, we love our beautiful women more than we can usually manage to say. We are different, and its OK. More words can be good for what a woman is, in the real world. She needs those 'wordy' abilities in her capacity as a mother.
A man, whether you agree or not, is not by nature, tied down with pregnancy, nursing babies, or explaining the world to battling tykes. Until modern times, men ranged, and women stayed close to the community center.
Men are blunt communicators, and convey complex relational issues with phrases like "Hey! Asshole!" A woman would more likely say "What do you think your doing? You Bitch!" Two words versus eight words. See?
Then one guy punches the other, where the women are still warming up.
'President pelosi! The Iranin missile is at mid point in its tragectory! Do we have authorization for a counterstrike?' And she'll be on the phone with one of AHMASTINKBOMBS minions 'I'm trying to tell you, we are trying to negotiate!' blah blah.
Most of the time a women is beautiful in her use of words, but sometimes words are clutter.
So now that I have defeated my own argument with all of this wordy crap, did I at least make you laugh?
USA all the way!
it may sound sexist
Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 03, 2006 12:32 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: sandpiper at December 03, 2006 11:51 PM (as4nC)
Posted by: Greyrooster at December 04, 2006 09:43 AM (qWbYR)
November 27, 2006
Beatle John Lennon's widow, Yoko Ono, has called for December 8, the anniversary of Lennon's death, to be observed as a day of worldwide healing.
According to Ono, the day of healing is "the day to ask for forgiveness from those who suffered the insufferable."
Uh ... does anyone know what the hell that means?
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
05:44 PM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.
According to Ono, the day of healing is "the day to ask for forgiveness from those who suffered the insufferable."
Uh ... does anyone know what the hell that means?
I know, i know. It refers to anyone who has ever listened to her sing.Posted by: Randman at November 27, 2006 06:54 PM (Sal3J)
Posted by: Jester at November 27, 2006 07:40 PM (iwtIO)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 27, 2006 07:57 PM (yJKSD)
While supplies last.
Posted by: n.a. palm at November 27, 2006 08:04 PM (Je/pU)
why is Yoko Ono, or Jesse Jackson for that matter, still given media ink?? We're as bad as the French, still listening to Johnny Holliday - another mystery.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at November 27, 2006 08:51 PM (2bJJN)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 27, 2006 09:13 PM (bLPT+)
Posted by: Buzzy at November 27, 2006 09:24 PM (CXz7T)
Posted by: Darth Vag at November 27, 2006 09:44 PM (HSkSw)
Since it was removed from the schools it seems to have been forgotten.
Posted by: John Ryan at November 27, 2006 10:47 PM (TcoRJ)
Christians don't blame themselves for the crimes of others.
Leftists blame others for the crimes oof themselves.
You eat shit for a living. How does it taste?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 27, 2006 11:09 PM (bLPT+)
Posted by: sandpiper at November 27, 2006 11:48 PM (4yJRe)
from the Lord's prayer: "And forgive us our trespasses, As we forgive those who trespass against us." Notice it's a two-way street. I doubt that's what Yoko (because she's a Leftist) had in mind.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 28, 2006 12:08 AM (yJKSD)
Has she been hanging out with Nancy?
Nancy Pelosi (Nov. 16th): "As I said to my colleagues, as we say
in church, let there be peace on Earth and let it begin with us. Let
the healing begin."
I threw up a little in my mouth. She thinks maybe this will erase
her harpy image she worked so hard to cultivate for the last six years?
I will begin to heal as soon as I'm not subjected to any more drivel from either woman.
Posted by: Oyster at November 28, 2006 06:41 AM (YudAC)
I pity the gullible souls who will join in the day of healing campaign. They have been given scant guidance.
For the sake of argument, assume the day of healing occurs with 100% participation and much fanfare. Would anything be different after it's over?
Posted by: Mike at November 28, 2006 07:07 AM (IP0gP)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 28, 2006 10:03 AM (yJKSD)
That's not to hard to grasp, is it? It may do some good. It sure won't do any harm.
Posted by: No Fear at November 28, 2006 01:35 PM (ZQepB)
christians and jews already regularly ask for forgiveness and atonement. World Healing Day just sounds like an atheist substitute of the real thing.
Posted by: Marcos zuniga at November 28, 2006 10:49 PM (yJKSD)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 28, 2006 10:50 PM (yJKSD)
I'm for a little healing around here. I think some of the threads have reached to extreme of a level of drama.
I am asking for a temporary cease fire regarding terms like 'lefturd', and 'reichwinger'. I am asking if we can put aside name calling, and cheap shots? Why not? I'ts not like I don't have a couple people here I wouldn't mind seeing recieve a cream pie in the face, but I'm willing to try and get over it for the Christmas (and other) holiday season.
If only among ourselves, lets try for the season, to stop making personal attacks. Lets argue over only the substance of a rival's post, and not who the posting party is.
It may be that some of us live only to squish our rival contributor. I would ask you to give it a rest.
It doesn't have to be some fake kind of thing where Greyrooster suddenly comes out and says he actually respects PuddleDuck. No one would believe that. Just avoid the obvious disrespect.
It goes all around. Do the people posting here represent the best? I extend a friendly challenge. Left, Right, whatever. Be polite when posting, for the season.
That just leaves the stupid 'ppornotoy ads' to deal with, but those aare pretty obviously worthles, and easily skipped.
So I hope I don't sound to sappy, but can we do this? Shall we try?
Merry Christmas, and goodwill, from me to you.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 29, 2006 11:33 PM (2OHpj)
www.yusufislam.com
Posted by: Dirk Sullivan at November 30, 2006 04:47 PM (nBsav)
Posted by: sandpiper at December 03, 2006 11:56 PM (as4nC)
November 26, 2006
Posted by: Rusty at
06:19 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 3 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Greg at November 26, 2006 08:11 PM (19GwZ)
Occupation of Afghanistan. One has to laugh at how you can believe all
kinds of conspiracy theories yet you don't believe basic history. Chew
on this...
"Soviet operations in the Aflghan War, in flact, did not aim as much at
defleating the Mujahideen as they did aim to intimidate and terrorize
the population into abandoning areas ofl intense resistance and
withdrawing support flor the guerrillas. The methods and weapons
employed— deliberate destruction ofl villages, high altitude carpet
bombing, napalm, flragmentation bombs, and the use of booby-trapped toys—testifly to the intent ofl the Soviet military's eflflort to terrorize the Aflghan civilian population." (Cassidy 14)
"The Soviet troops laid mines in fields and gave explosive toys to children." (Kagan)
Works Cited:
Cassidy, Robert M. Russia in Afghanistan and Chechnya: Military Strategic Culture and the Paradoxes of Asymmetric Conflict. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 2003.
Kagan, Frederick W. "Did We Fail in Afghanistan?." Commentary Mar. 2003: 39+.
Posted by: Randman at November 26, 2006 09:46 PM (Sal3J)
Are you sure that guy is not referencing the Soviet PFM-1 mine aka "Butterfly" / "Blue Parrot" mine used in Afghanistan?
I have seen that cited as being made to attract children, with its bright colors and weird shape -- however there is no evidence the soviets manufactured it to lure children, the agenda it was is often pushed as by the Left.
Posted by: davec at November 26, 2006 11:17 PM (QkWqQ)
references to those but also many to the toy explosives. I realize
that there is plenty of documentation that many bomblets from
cluster munitions have been picked up with tragic consequences by
children wondering what the shinning little orb on the ground is. Its
been a long time and I can't produce additional references at this
moment but I remember reports of stuffed animal bombs being placed by
the Soviets as well.
Posted by: Randman at November 27, 2006 12:13 AM (Sal3J)
operations in Afghanistan during the war, who denied that the Soviets
had used exploding toys, but he did say that once the rumor got out, he
made sure it had legs, and even sent a toy catalog to the KGB head of
station as a joke.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 27, 2006 07:43 AM (v3I+x)
Posted by: DAT at November 27, 2006 08:39 AM (G3PpJ)
Psuedostinians murder their own children and grannies by turning them into human bombs and human shields. They use them to murder Jews. They're the ones who think it's OK to kill Pali babies.
Yet you love them, and hate Jews. What a sick little fuck you are. We both know that if you get a toy from Hamasistan this Christmas, you'll call the bomb squad.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 27, 2006 12:39 PM (bLPT+)
Israel and the Jewish Agency are campaigning to give the Jewish state a larger share of Holocaust restitution funds, following a weak response from Israel for emergency aid during the ["retaliatory"] war against Hizbullah terrorists this summer.
Jewish Agency chairman Zev Bielski told reporters Sunday, "The Claims Conference is a very stubborn organization. We will continue this campaign until they give us our rightful seats at the table." The Claims Conference is responsible for allocating hundreds of millions of dollars a year in restitution payments.
Pretty ironic, eh?
Restitution from one holocaust goes to fund another.
And why the hell are we paying restitution? Shouldn't they be paying us for defeating Hitler?
Posted by: Greg at November 27, 2006 01:52 PM (19GwZ)
Where are the twit heads from dumb groups like CODEPINK whoa er always trying to prevent parents from buying war toys for their kids while these terrorists blow up the kids with boobietrapped toy stuffed animals the sameones they want to shove at kids
Posted by: sandpiper at November 27, 2006 03:40 PM (mi9uJ)
Islamic terrorism is all part of the vast Jewish conspiracy to bake children in their mahtzo balls. That must be why the Psuedostinian population has exploded (no pun intended,) under the "Holocaust."
Sig Heil, little Nazi.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 27, 2006 04:32 PM (bLPT+)
What was the right saying? I thought it was the right that had placed Russia into the evil empire ? Were the Russians actually our friends when they were fighting the fundamentalists in Afghanistan ?
87% of the Jewish vote in our last election went to the Democrats. Of course that was just the 13,000 sample done by CNN in the exit poll, so not everyone would agree as to its accuracy.
Posted by: John Ryan at November 27, 2006 04:58 PM (TcoRJ)
Might I suggest reading comprehension?
I said that the Left (mostly the ones calling for a ban on Land mines) said that the PFM-1 "Butterfly" mine was created to lure children into picking it up. Which is where a lot of the claims of bombs and toys in regards to Russia came from.
Wtf relevance does 87% of the Jewish vote have to this discussion, I have seen you banding it around in several threads, is it your new "signature"?
Posted by: davec at November 27, 2006 05:54 PM (QkWqQ)
Posted by: shemales pictures at November 27, 2006 06:47 PM (ZIFo0)
Posted by: shemales pictures at November 27, 2006 06:47 PM (ZIFo0)
Posted by: best penis enlargement at May 29, 2007 03:16 PM (FIjs7)
Posted by: how can men last longer during sex at May 30, 2007 10:56 PM (ASLm4)
November 22, 2006
And I'd also like to say, don't forget to watch the Colorado Buffalo Chips and the Notre Dame Drunken Potato Farmers get their asses handed to them this weekend.
thatisall
F.E.T.E.
Peace out.
Posted by: Vinnie at
11:56 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Graeme at November 23, 2006 05:52 AM (nRwET)
Posted by: Big White Infidel at November 23, 2006 06:30 AM (7ag34)
Posted by: William Teach at November 23, 2006 09:17 AM (doAuV)
Posted by: JeepThang at November 23, 2006 10:40 AM (yZQoS)
Posted by: Randman at November 23, 2006 11:52 AM (Sal3J)
Happy Thanksgiving to all of the Galatic Empire and especially those standing the watch and walking patrol around the world.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at November 23, 2006 12:40 PM (3nKvy)
Thanks for family and friends, and their continued health, and safety.
Thank God! Happy Thanksgiving.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 23, 2006 02:21 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: MegaTroopX at November 23, 2006 11:01 PM (v5fbO)
Posted by: JeepThang at November 23, 2006 11:02 PM (yZQoS)
Posted by: shemales pictures at November 27, 2006 06:47 PM (hnmnI)
November 18, 2006
In general the theme behind the Star Trek movies is the underlying goodness of humanity. This is why it is referred to as science fiction. The Star Trek universe, unlike the gritty Star Wars universe, serves up a vision of a very sanitary, well-vacuumed and quite modular future with cool toys like the holodeck. The holodeck is a large room which can take on the appearance of any time/place imaginable and can be populated with palpable replicas of people, aliens and things for you to interact with. It is obviously a place where your wildest fantasies could come true but is routinely used by the show's characters to play poker with Stephen Hawking.
Posted by: Ragnar at
09:05 PM
| Comments (37)
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
Q - Why are there no Muslims on "Star Trek"?
A - It's set in the future.
Posted by: Eric Lindholm at November 18, 2006 10:12 PM (fhunM)
stuff, but the reality is that Star Trek is the idealist future of
humanity. The one that could only become true if libs become realist.
How very ironic. Somewhere Q must be laughing.
Posted by: Randman at November 18, 2006 10:33 PM (Sal3J)
Posted by: eman at November 18, 2006 11:00 PM (FWrFx)
Posted by: Mike at November 18, 2006 11:18 PM (azNed)
Challenged by veteran interviewer Sir David Frost that the Western invasion of Iraq has "so far been pretty much of a disaster", Mr Blair said: "It has."â€
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=417121&in_page_id=1766&ito=1490
Posted by: Greg at November 18, 2006 11:43 PM (19GwZ)
Posted by: GowronX at November 19, 2006 12:25 AM (5bs1g)
Any show that doesn't star William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, James Doohan, and Deforest Kelly is not "Star Trek." So there.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at November 19, 2006 12:50 AM (vBK4C)
my life and like of star trek went to hell and won't ever come back star trek is ruined forever for me since I still work with this guy,mind you I really like and respect the guy but *groan* the star trek ,I know what would drive William Shatner to make that SNL skit x100.thank god for Battlestar Galactica .
Posted by: tarzan at November 19, 2006 02:19 AM (dz4G5)
Thank you. But one of my Sci Fi buddies loves the show.
star trek is ruined forever
Just be thankful he wasn't into porn.
Posted by: Randman at November 19, 2006 08:59 AM (Sal3J)
Posted by: rightwingprof at November 19, 2006 09:23 AM (o7KrD)
Firefly, however, is far more likely.
Posted by: JeepThang at November 19, 2006 09:35 AM (yZQoS)
Any show that doesn't star William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, James Doohan, and Deforest Kelly is not "Star Trek." So there.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at November 19, 2006 12:50 AM
===============
Well, I'm astounded. We agree. This may be the End of Days for all of us.
Posted by: No Fear at November 19, 2006 09:49 AM (ZQepB)
Posted by: eman at November 19, 2006 09:53 AM (FWrFx)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 19, 2006 09:55 AM (yJKSD)
Greg,
I knew it was you even before I saw your nic. But note, Blair said also:
It's not difficult [i.e., a "disaster"] because of some accident in planning, it's difficult
because there's a deliberate strategy - al Qaeda with Sunni insurgents
on one hand, Iranian-backed elements with Shia militias on the other -
to create a situation in which the will of the majority for peace is
displaced by the will of the minority for war."
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 19, 2006 10:10 AM (yJKSD)
Posted by: eman at November 19, 2006 10:51 AM (FWrFx)
Star Wars is in the past (opening scroll: "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...")
Star Trek is in the future (set in the 23rd Century).
Sheesh, if they're going to rip on something, they should at least get the time-lines straight.
Posted by: Henry at November 19, 2006 11:04 AM (pfFmJ)
Posted by: No Fear at November 19, 2006 12:24 PM (ZQepB)
I hope 'Stupid' remembers where he left it, and comes to get it back soon.
Mad magazine is mad, with a reasonable amount of stupid, and I find it preferable.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 19, 2006 12:32 PM (2OHpj)
As a writer, or a subject, it doesn't matter.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 19, 2006 12:36 PM (2OHpj)
http://www.prisonplanet.com/alleged_hijackers_may_trained_us_bases.html
Posted by: Greg at November 19, 2006 12:50 PM (19GwZ)
It is one of those 'alternate' stories where a world just like Earth goes down a different path.
This is the one where Yangs fight Koms for a few thousand years to regain their land, and Kirk recites the Yangs 'holy words' back to them. The Pledge of Allegience, and the Preamble to the US Constitution.
If you are a patriot first, you should enjoy this episode.
I bet Hijacker Greg was trained in the US as well. Probably at UCLA. I hear you have to get yourself tazered on camera as part of your initiation. Someday we will have phasers, and you will have to get yourself disintegrated on camera to join the innner circle of radicals. Some Libs would do that you know?
Picture 'PuddleDuck' doing Marvin the Martian ... "Being disintegrated makes me very angry! Very angry indeed!!!"
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 19, 2006 02:09 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: eman"
Does put a slightly different spin on the term "road rage".
Yes, the old Star Trek TV series was kinda stupid and the special effects were really hokey.
Missed the first 2 seasons (that Vietnam thing got in the way).
What I saw, as I watched it in rerun, was the moral lessons that were being taught in some of them.
The first movie had great special effects, but the plot sucked.
By Star Trek IV - The Voyage home, the characters were taking themselves less seriously, and is my favorite of the Star Trek movies.
Liked DS9. Watched Voyager a couple of times. That was all I could stand.
I own the entire series STNG on the obsolete media - video tape (will probably sell the 2 episode tapes on eBay, some day.
What I didn't see in the tv series and movies was an attempt to politicize the future.
And these movies and tv series led us to believe that we will be around in the 24th century, though we now know it's probably not the case.
We will have either blown ourselves up with nuclear weapons, polluted our world so much that is unlivable or will have created run away global warming or that supervolcano under Yellowstone will erupt, create a nuclear winter that will destroy most life on earth, including most of us.
So, when you get depressed about our likely future, you can go back and watch all of those "stupid" Star Trek movies and TV series, and think about how the future could have been.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 19, 2006 03:38 PM (qBTkS)
Human beings will make it.
If you look at the Star Trek series as a whole, the history they reference from their fictional future time, is full of calamity and disaster. The Eugenics wars, that created Khan. The wars that preceeded Cochran's warp drive invention. Wars that happened afterwards. Natural or man made disasters abound.
Human beings are actually very inventive, and they are basically good. Sometimes a bit trusting, but that is part of the good, not the bad.
God forbid, we end up with a planet ruled by Sharia ... eventually with no one to be pissed at, the global Caliphate would implode when a new idea emerged.
We don't want to fail our responsabilities for today, but if that should happen, humanity will still be inventive, creative, and a natural winner. Somewhere people will survive. They will find a way.
It is not Science Fiction to realize the human capacity for good, or human capacity to overcome challenges.
Sorry about the Marvin the Martian comment.
Go 'boldly' into the future.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 19, 2006 04:03 PM (2OHpj)
U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel, the incoming chairman of the House of Representatives' tax-writing committee, said he would introduce legislation to reinstate the draft as soon as the new, Democratic-controlled Congress convenes in January.
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-11-19T174004Z_01_N19349552_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-POLITICS-DRAFT.xml&src=rss&rpc=22
Heads, they win. Tails, we lose.
Posted by: Greg at November 19, 2006 05:36 PM (19GwZ)
Stop being an ass and trying to change the thread and behave like a good little doggy, wont ya Greggy?
To get back to the topic. Star Trek is still cool. Kirk is the best Captian when you want some humor as Picard was a bit too uptight but still okay.
Though to be honest, yea i prefer Star Wars. Vader could wipe out the Borg with his mind and not even break a sweat.
Posted by: THANOS at November 19, 2006 08:25 PM (5moa4)
What I didn't see in the tv series and movies was an attempt to politicize the future.
Wow...a lack of vision in you...what a surprise. Forget the subtext...this moron can't interpret basic plot lines.
led us to believe that we will be around in the 24th century, though we now know it's probably not the case.
What could possibly demonstrate the staggering ignorance and ego of
this small brained terrorist lover than his presumptuous to inform us
plebes that "we now KNOW" (ROFLMAO) that we will not be around in the
24th century. The staggering ignorance of this hyperventilating chicken
little is very amusing. Calling him a troll is giving his intellect far
too much credit. Trolls can at least dig the right direction to
irritate his subjects...not make them laugh.
Posted by: Randman at November 19, 2006 11:36 PM (Sal3J)
The Collective : “We are the Borg. You will be assimilated.â€
tbOne : “My technology is superior. Stop your attack or I will destroy you.â€
Posted by: tbone at November 20, 2006 12:18 AM (XDUhP)
Encyclopedias aren't what they used to be.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 20, 2006 03:35 AM (bLPT+)
There was an episode in STNG, where all alternate futures, existed at the same time.
The actions that we take today will help to determine which path to our future we will take.
Not all of the decisions are for humans to make, and so are out of our hands.
But, for the decisions that are in our hands, we had better start making them quickly and stop making decisions, that affect the future our planet, and it's people, based on politics or economic considerations, or by trying to blame someone else for the problems.
If the correct decisions aren't made soon, there won't be an economy, to use as an excuse, for not doing the right thing.
If you haven't noticed, I tend to err on the side of pessimism.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 20, 2006 06:35 AM (qBTkS)
Dumb assed Greg. T told you a week ago to get ready for the draft. Hope you are in that age group. I have some friends serving in Iraq that would love to meet you.
Won't be any economy. As the dow hits further new records. A lefturd is a lefturd, is a lefturd, is a lefturd, is a lefturd.
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 20, 2006 08:38 AM (R6qo5)
piddle,
you global warming is the greatest threat to our planet, but the planet will go on fine with or without us. So the only future that is threatened is Mankind's (not the planet's). That's why I think the greatest threat to mankind is the fall of Western civilization, not global warming. In 20-25 years we'll know who's right.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 20, 2006 09:34 AM (yJKSD)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 20, 2006 09:35 AM (yJKSD)
In case anyone is interested we have a few billion years before the curtain falls. It my hope we get together log before then.
Here's a link.
http://tinyurl.com/5xuup
Posted by: No Fear at November 20, 2006 10:00 AM (ZQepB)
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/death_of_earth_000224.html
Posted by: No Fear at November 20, 2006 10:02 AM (ZQepB)
What would Spock do?
Hoping that this situation continues, lets suppose that I accept that Global warming is a real man made disaster.
Now lets suppose that Islmofascism is a real man made disaster.
Global warming can theoretically be slowed, stopped, or even reversed, with the co-operation of enlightened and reasonable nations, in a scientifically supported effort. The true cost is unknown, but may be sufficient to collapse the global economy, especially in the western nations that produce most of the worlds science, medicine, and foriegn aid. This may be necessary to save the planet.
Islamofascism is unconcerned with co-operation, but requires submission. Enlightenment is often seen as an enemy, not an acheivement, and no reasonable nation is governed by Islamofascism. Science is a means to power, to be used in the cause of Islamification. Death on a Global scale would be only the deaths of kuffars and martyrs, both of which are to be celebrated. Industrialization serves their power. Global warming is no concern, as long as Islam prevails.
We have to decide if we will hamstring the west to slow down, maybe stop, or even reverse global warming, which may be a natural process that global life can adapt to, as has happened through countless ages.
Or ...
We can gear up to defeat the spread of Islamofascism, which if left unchecked will usher in a new dark age, without respect to the very enviromentl issues which it has been distracting us from. An age that could last another 1400 years, and even encourage more severe enviromental damage.
If we can preserve the west, we can preserve the knowledge base, and the enlightment, needed to adapt to a changing wotrld. If not, then we get caught in the flood tide of Islamic regression.
Now I am actually willing to admit that the planet goes through warm and cold cycles, and that humans can affect the severity of them.
I am certain that Islamofascism is real, and will not be stopped without a long hard expensive fight.
I also know that the western powers do not have a strong enough economy to do either one by itself, and have a guarantee of success. If we have to try to handle both problems, we may fail to prevent either altogether.
Considering all of this I'd rather take my chances with global warming, and stop Islamofascists and rouge states. I think we can save an enlightened, and rational future that can adapt to the warmer clime, and prepare for the next ice age.
I welcome other opinions.
USA all the way! As always!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 20, 2006 07:11 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: sandpiper at November 24, 2006 12:21 AM (4yJRe)
November 17, 2006
When he gets here, will somebody in the media grow a spine and ask him about allegations levelled by a radical cleric that he once was associated with the jailed Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman?
Posted by: Rusty at
11:35 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
*Cough*
Posted by: The Stout Republican at November 17, 2006 01:12 PM (vD2DY)
This man needs a bullet put in his head.
Posted by: Anti-Muslim Hero at November 17, 2006 01:35 PM (Nhfns)
Posted by: RepJ at November 17, 2006 01:50 PM (L5LRS)
Posted by: Dirk Sullivan at November 17, 2006 02:58 PM (nBsav)
Posted by: John Ryan at November 17, 2006 03:07 PM (TcoRJ)
Posted by: John Ryan at November 17, 2006 05:06 PM (TcoRJ)
Posted by: Susan Thomas at November 17, 2006 10:36 PM (3GYOV)
Posted by: Susan Thomas at November 17, 2006 10:38 PM (3GYOV)
Posted by: Susan Thomas at November 17, 2006 10:38 PM (3GYOV)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 18, 2006 01:23 AM (2OHpj)
I'll grant the comments sound heavy handed, but he is implicated by the admission (recorded) of a known muslim extremeist. If that line of inquiry establishes that he is a knowing financial contributor to terrorists, he deserves an appropriate sentence.
Maybe someone died because of funds provided by the artist formerly known as Cat?
As for violence, the incompetent usually forget it's an option until it's all that's left. By that point most of the damage that violence, if used earlier, would have prevented, has already been done.
That is why competent people weigh the use of violence intelligently, and use it at the best time, not long after it would have really helped.
Nothing says incompetent like not killing Osama, BEFORE 9-11. Nothing will say incompetent like letting Iran have nukes, BEFORE we do anything to stop it from happening.
So we agree "Violence is the last resort of the incompetent." Lets be competent then, shall we?
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 18, 2006 01:39 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 18, 2006 06:11 AM (R6qo5)
Violence is that last resort of the incompetent.
That and double posting. Not really surprising that the Susan types
can't tell the difference between venting violent words and actually
sawing off heads.
Posted by: Randman at November 18, 2006 10:03 AM (Sal3J)
November 16, 2006
Geeks, nerds, dweebs, and other social outcasts of the world are demanding that their 'religion' be taken seriously. That religion? Jedi Knight. I. Kid. You. Freaking. Not.
That, according to an article in the UK's Daily Mail today. It also claims that:
390,000 people in the UK belong to the religion of 'Jedi Knights'. There are also an estimated 70,000 Jedi knights in Australia, 53,000 in New Zealand and 20,000 in Canada.
Numbers for how many Jedi living in the U.S. were not available, but rumor has it that more Americans think of themselves as Sith than Jedi. Hey, we're just trying to bring order to a chaotic universe!
Actual. Freaking. Quote.
We therefore are calling upon the United Nations Association to change November 16 to the UN Interstellar Day of Tolerance, to reflect the religious make-up of our twenty-first century civilisation.May the Force be with you too. And may it lead you out of your parent's basement and may you finally get laid!‘Tolerance is about respecting difference where ever it lies, including other galaxies. Please don't exclude us from your important work. May the Force be with you.’
Hat tip Hauke, who also finds this in the comments:
"I would bet there are more TREKKIES out there - what about OUR relgion? What about OUR basic human rights? We've suffered more, and longer, than those Star Wars nerds! We've been Geeky since the 60's! When is OUR day coming?Star Trek geeks vs. Star Wars geeks? I feel a civil war brewing.......
UPDATE Bonus: Video! Including retard speaking Wookie, and loser 'translating'!!!!!!!
Posted by: Rusty at
01:55 PM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 271 words, total size 2 kb.
"Jedi are the guardians of peace in the galaxy.
Jedi use their powers to defend and protect, never to attack others.
Jedi respect all life, in any form.
Jedi serve others rather than ruling over them, for the good of the galaxy.
Jedi seek to improve themselves through knowledge and training. "
So maybe they could take care of the Islamofascists and bring peace to the galaxy?
Because we can't get the UN to realize that the prime directive (Star FleetGeneral order #1) doesn't apply to IslamoBorgs.
When the Jedi are murdered from within, when their best hope gets assimilated by IslamoBorgs, There is always Star Fleet General Order 24.
"General Order #24 - If a commanding officer deems that an individual or group of individuals pose a threat to Starfleet personnel or Federation civilians, he may order the total destruction of a planet's surface"
In other words, if they want a fight, then we destroy what constitutes their world. That should restore peace ... and we don't even need a whole death star, we could just do it with a regular warship. Sweet huh?
Later on, the one or two Jedi survivors who come out of hiding, can help the new republic guard peace again. JarJar can pretend to be Kofi Anan, and we can go back to playing video games and watching SciFi reruns. Till next episode ...
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 16, 2006 02:34 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Han Solo at November 16, 2006 02:51 PM (hrQvk)
What's funny is that the Jedi religion started off as just a joke and it spiraled from there.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at November 16, 2006 03:10 PM (VvXII)
On the other hand, my 10 year old recently found a mod for Elite Force that has him as a battlebot, fighting Borg in Helm's Deep. I kid you not.
Posted by: Jeff Medcalf at November 16, 2006 03:19 PM (JKGfQ)
The Jedi Knight's should know this as it was there wise master Yodi who said, "always two there must be, no more, no less."
Posted by: MTBpilot at November 16, 2006 03:36 PM (eZlEs)
I read a few years back, during the last census taking, people throughout the US and UK were claiming Jedi as their religion.. but no one took them seriously.
But we are out there, nonetheless.
I am "officially" Christian, so I cannot claim Jedi, as much as I would like to.
JeepThang
Jedi Meditations
Posted by: JeepThang at November 16, 2006 03:43 PM (yZQoS)
Posted by: Mrs Abe Froman at November 16, 2006 04:04 PM (BUbza)
Posted by: Steve O. at November 16, 2006 04:08 PM (CLQNo)
Posted by: tbone at November 16, 2006 04:26 PM (HGqHt)
Posted by: sandpiper at November 16, 2006 04:44 PM (O2c+K)
Posted by: Edric at November 16, 2006 05:51 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: RepJ at November 16, 2006 11:18 PM (GEwMv)
Peace is a lie, there is only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken.
The Force shall free me.
Posted by: Ragnar, the All-Seeing Pirate at November 17, 2006 12:22 AM (mcIY7)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 17, 2006 02:15 AM (R6qo5)
census in protest for having so few options to check when religious
affiliation was asked. I guess some took it more seriously than
others ;-). Nationality was calculated myopically too. The
UK isn't just England. It's also comprised of Scotland, Wales and
N. Ireland. A friend of mine there was ticked off because those
from Wales had to write it in under "other".
And Ragnar, I believe it goes like this:
"Fear leads to anger ... anger leads to stress ... stress leads to doobies ...and doobies lead to twinkies."
Posted by: Oyster at November 17, 2006 05:35 AM (YudAC)
Posted by: No Fear at November 17, 2006 09:23 AM (ZQepB)
Posted by: Jimmy the Dhimmi at November 17, 2006 10:21 AM (RIPcF)
I'm pretty sure the same could be said for Chrisitianity, Islam...etc
Posted by: Robert at November 17, 2006 01:50 PM (+rkhC)
Go ahead, join the incompetent squad if you must. So long as you change Lucas' script.
Fear leads to anger, anger leads to power, and power unchains you from your limitations.
Right on Ragnar, Sith all the way.
Posted by: Ymarsakar at November 18, 2006 10:43 AM (0VSBn)
Jediism is recognized in the United States and our clergy legally conduct marriages in all fifty states and DC.
We are incorporated as a non-profit religious organization in the State Of Texas and contributions to us are US income tax deductible.
http://TempleOfTheJediOrder.org
Posted by: Br. John Henry Phelan at November 18, 2006 04:48 PM (CUsz7)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 20, 2006 09:21 AM (R6qo5)
November 13, 2006
Hat tip : HotAir.
Posted by: Ragnar at
03:19 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: newyank at November 13, 2006 08:14 AM (XT7OJ)
Posted by: mrclark at November 13, 2006 09:37 AM (2e8KA)
Posted by: John Ryan at November 13, 2006 10:35 AM (TcoRJ)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 13, 2006 11:02 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Howie at November 13, 2006 02:02 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: Randman at November 13, 2006 06:29 PM (Sal3J)
Are you sure? When the commiecrats take over the media we might be controlled on what we can enjoy.
Posted by: DoubleU at November 13, 2006 07:25 PM (nzM3i)
Posted by: sandpiper at November 16, 2006 05:15 PM (O2c+K)
Posted by: fqvrohaj wlsngp at May 14, 2007 12:59 PM (dcC3Q)
Posted by: Ragnar at
02:31 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 7 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: David at November 13, 2006 04:17 AM (Wzj2b)
Posted by: FLLaw33870 at November 13, 2006 04:48 AM (38GUY)
Posted by: critic at November 13, 2006 04:58 AM (iZnOp)
Posted by: va chatterus at November 13, 2006 09:08 AM (MU4aK)
Posted by: DAT at November 13, 2006 09:13 AM (h56U3)
Posted by: Gina at November 13, 2006 11:31 AM (0TrTy)
Posted by: Fred Fry at November 13, 2006 01:14 PM (JXdhy)
Posted by: SGT Jeff (USAR) at November 13, 2006 04:20 PM (yiMNP)
"I don't see the humor. Why didn't they pick on a guy their size? Big Brave Men."
Lighten up, they do it to everyone! She probably just reached some milestone or certification. Something like that happened to my son, only he was stripped to his skivvies before being duct-taped. They then wrote all over his body, carried him into a Denny's at 3am and laid him on the floor while they all ate.
Posted by: Don Miguel at November 13, 2006 05:22 PM (+KixN)
...and, you don't wanna know what's in there...
I smelled like that fowl stuff for weeks, even after numerous washes, and re-washes...
Good to see that *some* traditions are still being upheld.
Posted by: IBin Pharteen at November 13, 2006 06:59 PM (8aWVT)
Posted by: Jill at November 14, 2006 08:53 AM (j/eWI)
She took both compliments, and heat for doing so.
Now it has been 'removed by the user'
The Liberal media terror organizations won this battle. They made a lot of us afraid of how they can spin a bit of fun,into propoganda. The young lady finally relented. Maybe she was required to pull it by her commanders? Maybe she just didn't realize how hysterical we have all gotten over the lefty media, until now.
The concern from Drudge seemed fair, and honest, but it actually aided the enemies among us. The ones that want our troops to be seen only as dupes, or KIA. The ones that want us to lose.
Our own media have terrorized us. Now we must be afraid to laugh, lest it be used by our enemies.
She still has one video up at YouTube, so I would suggest you encourage her to do more of them. If you looked into her reasons for posting the first vid, it was to show our troops in a positive, fun loving manner. We should honor that wish in any way we can.
Maybe it's time to treat the MSM as a genuine enemy.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 14, 2006 06:55 PM (2OHpj)
http://www.youtube.com/user/wickedharleyluva
She seems like a great American gal.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 14, 2006 07:02 PM (2OHpj)
But what if she had refused to participate in the "ritual"?
Did she really feel that she had a choice?
Would they have respected her right not to participate in their ritual?
Hmmmm....
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 15, 2006 07:07 AM (qBTkS)
November 10, 2006
It's time for a little R&R from the online propaganda war. Time to take a couple of days away from the worries about jihad, and watching politics and world events.
Jack London said it best in The Call of the Wild:
"He was sounding the deeps of his nature, and of the parts of his nature that were deeper than he, going back into the womb of Time."
Deer season starts tomorrow, the only time of year I get up before 9 a.m. on a day off.
Good luck to my fellow hunters who share this tradition with me.
And to my fellow veterans, since tomorrow is also Veteran's Day, God bless you and thank you.
Oh, and with luck, hopefully I'll be able to post an image of a nice rack that even Oyster would approve of.
Posted by: Vinnie at
10:47 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Darth Vag at November 11, 2006 07:56 AM (m2Rfy)
For those of you who don't know, Vinnie is referring to my self-portrait.
Posted by: Oyster at November 11, 2006 08:41 AM (YudAC)
UPDATE: Done. So, was Max Power the only one who caught me on the show?
Posted by: Rusty at
01:59 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Max Power at November 10, 2006 03:43 PM (R4293)
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 10, 2006 04:30 PM (8PoNP)
Posted by: Rusty at November 10, 2006 04:36 PM (JQjhA)
Posted by: Max Power at November 10, 2006 04:48 PM (wkRws)
Posted by: Editor at November 10, 2006 05:25 PM (adpJH)
Posted by: RepJ at November 10, 2006 06:07 PM (L5LRS)
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 10, 2006 08:14 PM (8PoNP)
Posted by: Professor von Nostrand at November 10, 2006 10:15 PM (Ys915)
Posted by: Big White Infidel at November 10, 2006 11:14 PM (T0x8b)
So how do we counter him?
Good luck hunting.
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at November 11, 2006 12:01 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: tbone at November 11, 2006 02:13 AM (XDUhP)
Posted by: Professor von Nostrand at November 12, 2006 05:27 PM (Bwpq7)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 17, 2006 12:13 AM (R6qo5)
November 09, 2006
If you don't think that's funny, then you are banned for life. I'm serious. And mind the commenting rules while you're at it.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:30 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
"Okay, that was the last straw."
Kelly and I both get the credit on this one.
Fatwa!
Posted by: dick at November 09, 2006 09:39 PM (MeFt3)
Posted by: dick at November 09, 2006 09:42 PM (MeFt3)
Posted by: SeeMonk at November 09, 2006 09:49 PM (n4VvM)
how many people u killed u dumb idiot. u love killing people!!!!!!!!!! u enjoy blood muslim blood but cry when one of ur little american gits gets dispatched to hell. u dumb idiot. ur gay.â€
Address resolves to Amsterdam and everything.
Posted by: SeeMonk at November 09, 2006 10:04 PM (n4VvM)
Posted by: Scot at November 09, 2006 10:26 PM (tmmwV)
And SeeMonk, I love those Islamic retards. They are a hoot.
And I have a dream, a dream of the Demotards getting swept from power in 2008. How sweet it will be. The idiots can't help themselves, and have already started the moonbatmania. The MSM will chase its tail trying to cover for these bastards.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 09, 2006 10:33 PM (8PoNP)
But I actually do see the humor in this. Why? because "Everyone thinks they have a sense of humor even those who don't" (My Cousin Vinny)
Actually this movie is so true to life it scares me. I lived this life and rejected it but for what? I would happily fill out a TPS reporrt instead of shoveling sh*T.
Posted by: NortonPete at November 09, 2006 10:49 PM (fVuwW)
Posted by: NortonPete at November 09, 2006 10:58 PM (fVuwW)
*OFF TOPIC COMMENT*
To all the men that have worn the Globe and Anchor, all the men who will so do in the future and most importantly to those giving their lives for freedom
HAPPY BIRTHDAY!
“…First to fight for right and freedom…â€
Gung Ho!
Greyrooster --- listen up man I’m talking to you ! Happy 231! One piece of cake and a few beers – us old farts have to watch our calories!
An old exJarhead
Posted by: Rod Stanton at November 10, 2006 06:17 AM (/QowG)
Posted by: oscar at November 10, 2006 07:09 AM (VsOhY)
As previously stated at AOSHQ:
Bank of America turned the song upside down, held it by the ankles, and stuffed the microphone in its mouth.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Posted by: Rich at November 10, 2006 03:39 PM (ujTqH)
Posted by: RepJ at November 10, 2006 06:10 PM (L5LRS)
November 07, 2006
1. Mario Lopez
2. Joey Lawrence
3. Emmitt Smith
The loss of Emmitt would be huge defeat for those of us who have to suffer the fact that our wife is TiVOing two shows at once, and therefore we cannot change the channel.
Weep with me.
Update: Glad that's over.
Posted by: Vinnie at
08:12 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
Fore! L o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O7
Posted by: Last laugh Larry at November 08, 2006 01:49 AM (Dd86v)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 08, 2006 07:33 AM (dk0ga)
We are so committed, we created a whole new site to encompass our diverse perspectives on this momentous event.
So, without further ado, please click to view our unrivalled Election 2006 liveblogging coverage.
Posted by: Vinnie at
01:16 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: ttt at November 07, 2006 06:20 AM (I8cir)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 07, 2006 07:39 AM (8e/V4)
Is Donna Shalala, the less than 5 foot tall Lesbianese-American, up for election?
Posted by: Darth Vag at November 07, 2006 07:49 AM (HSkSw)
If I have a long talk with my boss, I'll be sure to finger you. I'll tell him a Jawa made me do it.
Posted by: Ouch at November 07, 2006 08:10 AM (gzjHf)
TRANSLATION: Republicans must not go vote today.
Posted by: n.a. palm at November 07, 2006 08:34 AM (OSNvJ)
November 06, 2006
Hellooooooooo deer season!
A fatwa:
In the name of Allah the most merciless and uncompassionate.
I call upon my brothers, ye who wear the holy garments of Mossy Oak© and carriers of the mighty compound bow, muzzleloader, shotgun, and centerfire rifle.
Jihad upon the infidel whitetail! Jihad upon the dirty Mule deer! A jihad upon all legal game animals!
"Slay them where ye may find them." (with accordance to local hunting regulations, of course). "Field dress them, butcher them, and serve them at the dinner table." - Sura 9:29 of the Hunter's Holly Quoran.
"Give a man a steak, he'll eat for a day. Teach him to hunt, he'll eat for a lifetime. And, as an added bonus, piss off the animal rights psychos." - Vinnie 1:13 - The Hunter's Holy Bible, Outdoor Life Network Edition.
Posted by: Vinnie at
11:58 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 139 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Fred Fry at November 07, 2006 07:17 AM (JXdhy)
Posted by: hank at November 07, 2006 07:36 AM (pU0SG)
Posted by: blackflag at November 07, 2006 10:25 AM (Mq5jS)
Being the compassionate, caring person that I am, I passed on killing a young doe this weekend because it would have condemned her still-spotted fawn to death as well. By the end of the season, he will be old enough to survive without his mom. I'll kill her then.
Posted by: Charlie at November 07, 2006 10:53 AM (a5VYD)
Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at November 07, 2006 10:58 AM (R+h5X)
Posted by: cyberray at November 13, 2006 09:40 PM (XBrsZ)
November 05, 2006
Given the MSM's compulsion to mention Republicans, evanglicals and sex scandals in just about every article they write, I'm wondering what headlines might we expect from AP on election eve? Keep an eye out for these:
Labor Crunch at "Crippling" Five-Year High
Church May Resort to Hiring "Suspected Homosexuals" to Meet Staffing NeedsDallas Cowboys Routed by Washington
More Evidence that Evangelicals are "Sitting This One Out?""Doogie Howser, M.D." Announces Gayness
Sen. Bill Frist, M.D. Once Claimed to be "a big fan" of Show About Young Man in Adult SituationRecent Rise in Saudi "Orgies" Noted
Orgy-Mongers Linked to Premises Once Visited by Former Bush Family Business Partners (Who Might Have Been Gay)Karl Rove Spotted Buying George Michael Album
Evangelicals Express "Appropriate Concern"Rumsfeld Under Fire
Reports Surface of "Rampant Butt-Piracy" at PentagonEvangelicals Disappointed Again
GOP Accepted Contributions from "Known Pornographer"Dick Cheney's Daughter: "Yes, I'm STILL a lesbian."
Posted by: Ragnar at
08:45 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 2 kb.
And the Longhorns, Geezus, they are like a whole Army division in and of themselves.
Posted by: Darth Vag at November 05, 2006 09:57 PM (HSkSw)
Posted by: RepJ at November 05, 2006 10:56 PM (T3Wz2)
The good news? Romo looked somewhat decent. Too bad the rest of the team sucked.
Posted by: dick at November 05, 2006 11:06 PM (MeFt3)
Posted by: Professor von Nostrand at November 05, 2006 11:25 PM (Bwpq7)
At any rate, she was all those things by my standards. Of course, I have nothing against atheists or lesbians in general. Racists I have a problem with.
Posted by: The All-Seeing Pirate Ragnar at November 05, 2006 11:52 PM (jNFCA)
guy I knew and admired his snappy outfit. I am sorry if I hurt the
party.
Posted by: Randman at November 06, 2006 12:00 AM (Sal3J)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 06, 2006 12:26 AM (bLPT+)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 06, 2006 01:25 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: oscar at November 06, 2006 06:57 AM (VsOhY)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 06, 2006 07:58 AM (cNF2m)
Posted by: RepJ at November 06, 2006 10:29 AM (XXEg4)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 06, 2006 11:54 PM (0AdXP)
Haggard's situation is a disappointment to Christian conservatives, whom President Bush and other Republicans are courting heavily in the run-up to Tuesday's election.I can see no rationale for throwing all this extraneous information into an article on the preacher and his gay lover other than to attempt to drive a wedge between Republicans and evangelicals right before election day.Many were already disheartened with the president and the Republican-controlled Congress over their failure to deliver big gains on social issues even before the congressional page scandal involving former Rep. Mark Foley.
Haggard, who had been president of the evangelical association since 2003, has participated in conference calls with White House staffers and lobbied Congress last year on Supreme Court nominees.
The Foley comment can perhaps be explained by the fact that it was another recent sex scandal. But what do Bush and the Republicans have to do with Haggard? Nothing, as near as I can tell, other than some telephone conversations with GOP staffers on a few occasions, and some lobbying of Congress. What relevance does any of that have to do with evangelicals being "disappointed" with the Republicans?
None that I can see. This was just a very clumsy way to squeeze in another reference to evangelical "disappointment" with Republicans.
Posted by: Ragnar at
08:20 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 05, 2006 09:33 PM (cNF2m)
"Stay home from the polls."
"You can't trust the Republicans."
The agenda of MSM who miss weilding power from their unelected thrones. They want to be king makers. Power brokers. A bunch of cut-rate Charles Montgomery Kanes. They aren't close enough to being Hearst. They can only aspire to the celluloid imitation.
At the supermarket today was the nearly ever-present pitch person for the local newspaper. It used to be two newspapers but is now, really, one.
I didn't even waste time telling him why I won't give that paper my money.
Posted by: GI Joe at November 05, 2006 09:43 PM (0euLV)
No, seriously. I've never heard of this preacher, so why is the MSM focusing on this? Naw, there's no bias there.
Posted by: RepJ at November 05, 2006 10:54 PM (T3Wz2)
Haggard had a regular weekly telephone conversation with the president and this information absolutely is relevant. Perhaps, if you really do wish to pursue this line of argument, you should ask yourself what a poorly delivered attempt at humor has to do with the Democratic party or any House or Senatorial campaign?
Posted by: Professor von Nostrand at November 05, 2006 11:29 PM (Bwpq7)
Could it possibly be due to the fact that voting the Democrat ticket is irrational?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 06, 2006 12:31 AM (bLPT+)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 06, 2006 01:28 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 06, 2006 07:59 AM (cNF2m)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 06, 2006 09:00 AM (v3I+x)
Exactly...at the very least the gay republicans will make the
evangelicals afraid to turn their back on them to avoid getting it in
the kester
Posted by: Randman at November 06, 2006 09:37 AM (Sal3J)
Posted by: n.a. palm at November 06, 2006 10:31 AM (qXNHZ)
Posted by: Ragnar at
10:44 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Dan at November 05, 2006 12:04 PM (ILHet)
Racism, what racism? There's no racism in America.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 05, 2006 12:40 PM (fMHQi)
Posted by: NortonPete at November 05, 2006 12:42 PM (fVuwW)
Posted by: Jay at November 05, 2006 01:49 PM (kfClZ)
Posted by: Cdat at November 05, 2006 03:36 PM (1ISxl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 05, 2006 05:17 PM (bLPT+)
Posted by: The All-Seeing Pirate Ragnar at November 05, 2006 07:03 PM (jNFCA)
Someone - anyone - please give me one good, valid reason why lefturds should be allowed to live.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 05, 2006 08:18 PM (v3I+x)
Posted by: coor at November 05, 2006 10:11 PM (jaQRE)
You need your attitude rearanged.
Not only are you a proven liar, but you're an idiot troll.
Posted by: dick at November 05, 2006 11:11 PM (MeFt3)
Posted by: Howie at November 06, 2006 09:23 AM (D3+20)
November 04, 2006
Posted by: Ragnar at
07:49 PM
| Comments (49)
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
I've got my not-so-funny, but fair vid up. Yeah, it's nothin' special, but it's not bad for a first attempt.
Resign
Posted by: Editor at November 04, 2006 10:28 PM (uL7cK)
I think Kerry is was same as Armstrong. Both willing to put there balls where their words were!
unlike Bush,,,,,,
Posted by: sol at November 05, 2006 12:10 AM (VFilb)
As an aside, Neil Armstrong hit me in the ass with a golf ball during a celebrity tournament when I was a kid.
(some freeper is going to say, "Too bad it wasn't your head." Then another freeper will say, "What's the difference?" Har har.)
Posted by: CafeenMan at November 05, 2006 12:55 AM (eNwl1)
the Second set of words said on the moon by Buzz
(Buzz is a legend! and a great writer!!)
"Maybe one small step for you , but it's one giant leap for me!"
Posted by: sol at November 05, 2006 01:00 AM (VFilb)
Posted by: Max Power at November 05, 2006 05:02 AM (PM8kH)
Posted by: Max Power at November 05, 2006 05:02 AM
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
You don't think that what Armstrong did was of major historical importance?
Posted by: CafeenMan at November 05, 2006 06:21 AM (eNwl1)
He is as bad at telling a joke as John Kerry.
Or is this as funny as Brits can get (sorry Brits).
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 05, 2006 07:17 AM (fMHQi)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 5, 2006 08:01 AM"
They're so predictable, eh, CafeenMan?
Always an insightful, thoughtful response.
Jeff's only claim to fame is that his moronic responses are just a cunthair less moronic than those of GayBooster.
If you didn't know one from the other, you could easily get them confused.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 05, 2006 07:24 AM (fMHQi)
Don't claim military service, here, if you haven't proved yourself to be "true believer".
You will be labeled as a phony, yet a great Googler.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 05, 2006 07:32 AM (fMHQi)
Other than that, it's like comparing George Washington to Benedict Arnold. No, wait. Arnold was a brave and competent soldier, so he cant be compared to Kerry.
CafeebMan, I'm sure you get hit in the ass rythmically on a regular basis.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 05, 2006 08:01 AM (bLPT+)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 05, 2006 08:01 AM
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
What is it with you guys and sex anyway? You seem really fixated on it.
Anyway... I can't believe you're comparing Neil Armstrong to Benedict Arnold. But you're entitled to your opinion. Those of us who gave part or all of our lives to military service protected that right for you.
Posted by: CafeenMan at November 05, 2006 08:17 AM (eNwl1)
Its hard to put it out of our mind when there is a dick posting.
"Those of us who gave part or all of our lives to military service protected that right for you."
Would you like us to cue the music now?
Posted by: Randman at November 05, 2006 09:36 AM (Sal3J)
everyone who isn't with the program yet exactly why you should all be
killed. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 05, 2006 12:14 PM (v3I+x)
I'm fixated on sex because I have a strong libido, but don't get any ideas.
Why am I not surprised that the moron who compared Neil Armstrong to Ketchup Kerry thinks I compared Armstrong to Benedict Arnold?
Thanks for your military service Gomer. You would never lie about a thing like that, after all.
The only joke Kerry told was his non-apology.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 05, 2006 12:56 PM (bLPT+)
You do know that Armstrong is a Muslim, right? Didn't think so. Nasty facts getting in the way of your bigotry. How dare they!
Posted by: CP at November 05, 2006 01:14 PM (m9IYH)
You do know that Armstrong is a Muslim, right? Didn't think so. Nasty facts getting in the way of your bigotry. How dare they! "
Wow! You just demonstrated that your a regular visitor to radical Muslim websites you assmunch.
That is a stupid rumor that the lying Mohammadins spread all over so
they can claim they have somebody intelligent joining their cult.
You do know that you are an ignorant terrorist supporting cunt, right?
Didn't think so. Nasty facts getting in the way of your terrorist cock
sucking.
Posted by: Randman at November 05, 2006 02:01 PM (Sal3J)
Did you know that Bush and Cheney are muslims? I guess you better start praising them. You're not one to let nasty facts get in the way of your bigotry, after all.
Why are foreigners so fucking stupid?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 05, 2006 02:12 PM (bLPT+)
You RWs are too easy to toy with.
Posted by: CP at November 05, 2006 04:27 PM (m9IYH)
For the record. I'm Christian. Something which neither of you two seem to know much about, but I don't have time to explain about Christianity.
Posted by: CP at November 05, 2006 04:38 PM (m9IYH)
idiot, you're doing so well. Wallow in your ignorance, it makes me no
nevermind.
You RWs are too easy to toy with.
I will admit that google misled me about Armstrong, and for that I
apologize. Still, I have to ask. If he was, would your opinions of him
change?
ROFLMAO! Too fucking funny.As for my opinion on Armstrong if he was a Muslim. Well...if he really
said that he had heard the Muslim screech to prayer while on the moon,
as those sites claimed, I would think him a raving moonbat. But if he
didn't go sawing off heads and sending money to terrorist I would not
give a damn.Of course...I sure that will have you saying I am engaging
in astronautism.
Posted by: Randman at November 05, 2006 05:32 PM (Sal3J)
You consistently excuse terrorists on this site. You consistently impugn the people trying to stop them. You obviously hate America, the world's leading light and exemplar of civilization.
Where did your google search take you? No legitimate site wouuld claim Armstrong is an islamopithecine. I think Randman has you pegged. You're a regular visitor to jihad sites. Why wouldn't my opinion of Armstrong change if he were a koranimal?
I doubt you could explain Christianity. No real Christian makes excuses for scum-sucking Arabs who murder innocent Jews as a way of life. Last time I checked, the wogs weren't the chosen children of God. A Christian anti-Semite in the 21 century. Martin Luther would be so proud.
You're just bent because we called you on your rank hypocricy concerning racism and sexism.
It's not too late to pull your head out. Fox News is airing "Obsession" right now. Order it from your local cable company, as I'm sure you're too intolerant to have any moderate friends who might have a subscription already.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 05, 2006 05:36 PM (bLPT+)
I just did a Google search of Neil Armstrong. After viewing hundreds of site headings, I failed to find a single one that linked him to islam.
Let's see you squirm your way out of this one, Dhimmie.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 05, 2006 05:45 PM (bLPT+)
Letsee. Anti-Semite, anti-American, terrorist supporter, communist (did I miss any?) I tell ya, when you follow the talking points, you really follow them. Good show. Fine. I don't really give a damn what your opinion is of me because your opinion matters little. If you want to have a mature debate, if whenever you can handle it, then look me up. This would require you to provide your own thoughts though. Can you handle it? Your reply to this will no doubt leave any question of that a forgone conclusion.
For your part, I assume that if you were to replace "Muslim" with "Jew", you'd be in Hitler's Germany of 2006. I know, I know, a ghastly comparison and really, there is no comparison. Jews are good, Muslims are bad...yadda, yadda, yadda. I'd recommend learning that history, but you wouldn't do that. You'd deny the comparison is valid, call me some more names and move on
For now, I'll stick with debating with those who are capable of independent and critical thought. Maybe you can look those concepts up by using the Google. Though, it would seem, you can't even use Google properly, c'est le vie.
I expect your insults, name calling and other miscellaneous vitriol in triplicate. You may also include threats of bodily harm, "yo momma" lines and intellectual derision. Please make it a good hatred, I'd hate to see the opportunity wasted. Say whatever comes to your minds, I don't really give a damn and really, you wouldn't be doing your job as a sheeple if you didn't. If it's really good, I'll print it out and frame it. Now! On to it! Tell me why kind of person I am! Savage me! Make it good. I'm marking you on it!Posted by: CP at November 05, 2006 06:44 PM (m9IYH)
Posted by: Randman at November 05, 2006 02:01 PM
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I'll bet you get a nice visual of that and even enjoy it.
Posted by: CafeenMan at November 05, 2006 07:48 PM (eNwl1)
Posted by: coor at November 05, 2006 10:25 PM (jaQRE)
Wow. You sidestepped the issue of your racism, sexism, anti-Americanism, and other bigotries as nimbly as a mulim woman buried up to her neck dodging a stoning.
Why did you bring up John 3:14? You obviously have no desire to find grace, and mullet heads like you are afraid of serpents.
Projection about assigned talking points? You wouldn't be a mindless leftist without it.
A hard-left fanatic who equates a moderate with Hitler? What were the odds! (Roughly 100%.) A leftie who neglects to mention the name and ideology of Der Fuhrer's socialist party? (200%, because you fascists always deny it.)
An anti-Semite who compares Jews unfavorably to genocidal wogs and denies her anti-Semitism? Can you say "occupier," "aparthied state," "Zionism is racism," "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," and muslim posing as a Christian? Probability that you're a raging Jew hater? Another 200%.
A leftie who thinks Google is accurate and educational? Can you say "dee, dee, dee!"
Good luck convincing anyone you learned Neil Armstrong is a "muslim" from a Google search of his name, you flea-bitten islamopithecine.
Hey. Did you know that little muhammad was a lice-ridden pedophile, coward, liar, thief, rapist, murderer, Satanist, and prophet pretender who serially molested camels? (Peace be upon him.) How do you feel about that?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 06, 2006 01:33 AM (bLPT+)
Posted by: interracial at December 19, 2006 09:28 PM (B3QwP)
Posted by: Double Penetration at December 20, 2006 11:38 AM (KIU4h)
Posted by: Gonzo at December 21, 2006 06:22 AM (B3QwP)
Posted by: monsters cock at December 26, 2006 10:18 AM (0LU8X)
Posted by: big black tit at December 30, 2006 09:22 PM (KDtHu)
Posted by: nude at January 06, 2007 11:01 AM (KDtHu)
Posted by: spy cam at January 09, 2007 10:29 AM (B3QwP)
Posted by: Big Cocks at March 04, 2007 09:51 AM (15AcN)
Posted by: Big Cock Blog at March 21, 2007 11:12 AM (HEsjT)
Posted by: Milf Hunter at March 24, 2007 06:09 AM (HEsjT)
Posted by: Milf Diary at March 25, 2007 03:21 AM (HEsjT)
Posted by: Sexy Milf at March 26, 2007 01:19 AM (HEsjT)
Posted by: milf anal at March 30, 2007 03:03 AM (i1pGq)
Posted by: milf anal at April 01, 2007 11:12 AM (bJQKU)
Posted by: horny milf at April 02, 2007 08:37 PM (Eop0x)
Posted by: milf anal at April 03, 2007 11:03 PM (fVmR5)
Posted by: Anal Penetration at April 21, 2007 01:19 PM (4Dcw/)
Posted by: Anal Pain at April 27, 2007 03:06 AM (LNvLv)
Posted by: Spambots at April 30, 2007 10:27 AM (FSLK+)
Posted by: Note Based Ringtone at May 11, 2007 08:21 PM (duLAT)
Posted by: fucked sleep at May 18, 2007 09:46 PM (e+7zn)
Posted by: milf thong at May 20, 2007 07:47 PM (1PRnC)
Posted by: lesson milf vanessa at May 22, 2007 01:55 PM (AV1A+)
November 02, 2006
Posted by: Ragnar at
01:59 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 5 words, total size 1 kb.
My thoughts drift back to erect nipple wet dreams about Mary Jane Rottencrotch and the Great Homecoming Fuck Fantasy. I am so happy that I am alive, in one piece and short.
I'm in a world of shit . . . yes. But I am alive. And I am not afraid.
MARINE PLATOON (singing)
Come along and sing this song and join our family.
M-I-C-K-E-Y- M-O-U-S-E
Who's the leader of the club that's made for you and me?
M-I-C-K-E-Y M-O-U-S-E
Hey there! Hi there! Ho there!
You're as welcome as can be.
Mickey Mouse ...
Posted by: Dan at November 02, 2006 04:11 AM (ILHet)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 02, 2006 08:09 AM (cNF2m)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 02, 2006 08:46 AM (cNF2m)
Posted by: newyank at November 02, 2006 09:30 AM (XT7OJ)
Posted by: Howie at November 02, 2006 09:33 AM (D3+20)
to make mice, rats, and JOOOOOooooozzzz more acceptable to people, eh
gregturd?
Okay, I'm kidding but not really, because I heard some 'slamoturd cleric actually said this.
Gregturd, dear, wasn't Walt Disney a JOOOO, or at least a member of the Illuminati?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 02, 2006 09:36 AM (v3I+x)
Posted by: Dan at November 02, 2006 09:51 AM (ILHet)
But seriously, Mo-slimes are VERY insecure about their religion so that ridicule and derision like this are a lot more damaging to their morale than one might at first suspect.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at November 02, 2006 10:51 AM (1juA+)
Posted by: Mrs Abe Froman at November 02, 2006 02:34 PM (2TZPX)
November 01, 2006
Posted by: Bluto at
04:33 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 353 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: cory at November 01, 2006 02:40 PM (+pzHI)
Posted by: Fred Fry at November 01, 2006 06:25 PM (i6csM)
report. Thanks for all your fine work.
Posted by: NortonPete at November 01, 2006 07:41 PM (fVuwW)
I donated earlier from TDPB and will probably do it again. Can't have Rusty feeling left out!
I guess I just have a soft heart for military kids
(I was an AF brat).
I hope she posts some pics of the little cuties!
Posted by: Melissa In Texas at November 01, 2006 11:05 PM (bbxLM)
Thanks Melissa! I have more family military connections than I can count. Always enjoy trying to pay them back for all they have done for my family.
Texas? Same here - Dallas area!
Posted by: Max Power at November 01, 2006 11:21 PM (PM8kH)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 02, 2006 07:42 AM (cNF2m)
Posted by: Pam at November 02, 2006 03:12 PM (I6qdQ)
56 queries taking 0.0938 seconds, 568 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
