They have puppets. And many, many buttcracks.

Lameassed and over-predictable… by the book it was.
I thought I blended right in in my local disguise but since many of the puppets were bussed in from hither and San Francisco I was eyed with suspicion the whole time...and when I approached my 3 buddies in the swarm I gave myself away for sure and was subjected to incoherent ramblings being talked at me in Moonbatish for the whole 10 minutes I stood there...until I wandered along only to be stopped from crossing the street by some asshole in an orange vest directing traffic no, no, no, no WAIT
Ahem? Thanks, but I’m an adult who knows how to cross the street all by myself. I didn’t stick around to see if the cop I complained to actually did anything about it.

Lame Lame LAME.

Every time these types do this here, I'm working.

Damn you, The Man, how dare you repress me!!!

Posted by: Vinnie at 12:06 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.

His name is Cornholio. He needs TP for his bunghole.

Sorry Chuck, you just got something that rhymes with "chucked."

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A bipartisan resolution repudiating President George W. Bush's decision to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq failed to advance in the U.S. Senate on Monday, dealing a serious setback to critics of the war.

"You know, nasty little fellows such as yourself always get their comeuppance."

Posted by: Vinnie at 10:46 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.

A New York Times moonbat forgot to wear his tinfoil hat while watching the commercials that ran during the Super Bowl.

Money quote:

It was as if Madison Avenue were channeling Doc in “West Side Story,” the gentle owner of the candy store in the neighborhood that the two street gangs, the Jets and Sharks, fight over. “Why do you kids live like there’s a war on?” Doc asks plaintively. (Well, Doc, this time, there is.)

During other wars, Madison Avenue has appealed to a yearning for peace. That was expressed in several Super Bowl spots evocative of “Hilltop,” the classic Coca-Cola commercial from 1971, when the Vietnam War divided a world that needed to be taught to sing in perfect harmony.

Coca-Cola borrowed pages from its own playbook with two whimsical spots for Coca-Cola Classic, “Happiness Factory” and “Video Game,” that were as sweet as they were upbeat. The commercials, by Wieden & Kennedy, provided a welcome counterpoint to the martial tone of the evening.

Those who wish the last four years of history had never happened could find solace in several commercials that used the device of ending an awful tale by revealing it was only a dream.

I guess if you liked any of the commercials, you should be ashamed of yourself for being brainwashed by Chimpy McBusHallibuRoveton.

stein hoist: the lovely and talented Claire at the lovely and talented Sondra K's.

Posted by: Vinnie at 12:05 AM | Comments (34) | Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.

Here's a transcript of Daniel Pipes' real world response to the fantasy world evoked by Red Ken Livingstone during their debate on January 20. The seven-part video of the debate (originally posted to YouTube) has now been edited into one clip and posted here.

h/t : Steven Emerson.

Posted by: Ragnar at 06:39 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.

I certainly understand the abuses of the ACLU as regards public displays of Christian symbolism. Nonetheless, I'm not sure this is such a good idea.

Posted by: Ragnar at 07:04 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.

Quote of the week:

"Let's say I believe firmly in Ronald Reagan's 11th commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican," Cheney told the magazine. "But it's very hard sometimes to adhere to that where Chuck Hagel is involved."

Speaking of Cheney, this is pretty funny.

Posted by: Vinnie at 12:48 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.

File under: not surprised. FYI--Islamic Jihad is the group that bombed a bakery in Israel yesterday, murdering three.

Posted by: Rusty at 10:44 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Jihadists love Democrat talking points.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2007 12:13 PM (8e/V4)

2 And vice versa...

Posted by: Insomniac at January 30, 2007 12:58 PM (UYKDB)

3 Dr. S.,
You probably already know this but this so-called "Islamic Jihad" group is a creation of the Islamic Republic of Iran and is their proxy in Palestinian areas. Consequently, if Islamic Jihad endorse Jimmy Carter that means the Islamic Republic is endorsing Jimmy Carter; which is NOT surprising, considering Jimmy Carter's moves at ingratiating himself to Ayatollah Khomeini in 1978-1979.
Alan Peters has a very informative article entitled


Jimmy Carter's Illegal Demands on Shah

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at January 30, 2007 04:25 PM (vixLB)

4 ... I'm sorry that was meant to read "which is NOT surprising considering Jimmy Carter's moves at ingratiating himself to Ayatollah Khomeini in 1978-1979.

Sorry about that.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at January 30, 2007 04:26 PM (vixLB)

5 Garduneh : Wow! It looks like it fixed itself

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2007 04:31 PM (2cR/Y)

6 Thanks Howie :-)
And sorry I couldn't help with translation, but I'm so unbelievaly busy; speaking of which .......

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at January 30, 2007 05:05 PM (vixLB)

7 No problem.  Rusty has it.  It could be old audio overlay, who knows.  Jihadis are full of it. 

Posted by: Darth Odie at January 30, 2007 05:08 PM (2cR/Y)

8 They can have the sissy. I wonder if peanut farmers know how to grow garbanzo beans?

Posted by: greyrooster at January 30, 2007 06:01 PM (w+w6p)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

I was gong to pass on this, but since Wooga begged for a thread, here goes. I find none of this interesting in the least. Not even the obvious joke about Aisha, which even I wouldn't stoop so low to make. It's beneath me. Besides, at least Aisha was a girl...... more...

Posted by: Rusty at 08:25 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.

David Bell says we've overreacted to 9/11. No, seriously. Those are his words. Why have we overreacted? He blames the Enlightenment.

So, I guess David Hume and Descartes are really to blame, and not Osama bin Laden and Mohammed Atta?

He's right, though, when he says that the Islamists may be just as bad as Hitler, but they lack the capacity to inflict the damage of a Hitler. But that is not to say they lack the potential for that harm. And isn't that an argument for the alleged "overreaction to 9/11"? That states such as the Taliban, which openly supported the Salafi jihad, and states such as Iraq, which covertly supported it, might be even more dangerous than Hitler--who never perfected atomic weapons--was?

As John Donovan says, "granting that Islamofascists don't necessarily have the capacity, to constitute an existential threat to the United States, neither did Adolf Hitler when he sent his Army in to re-occupy the Rhineland." QED, I believe.

It also seems to suggest that we've underreacted to 9/11 on another front. That Iran, which is both hostile to the U.S. and openly supports jihad (albeit of the Khomeinist variety), is also on the fasttrack toward developing nuclear weapons. And if nuclear weapons in the hands of the Iranian Mullahs isn't every bit as dangerous as the Luftwaffe, I don't know what is.

HT: Dave Schuler who's point about Soviet casualties is well taken.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:37 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 241 words, total size 2 kb.

I hate MySpace. For a number of reasons. It's to the blogosphere what Jerry Springer and Oprah Winfrey are to "news". So, this doesn't surprise me. Not. One. Bit.

Son of a Gaius sends this from Iraq:

Today a friend pointed out a group on myspace that is anything but friendly, a veritable slap in the face to the men and women of the U.S. armed forces. In a search, the name of this group shows up as "Hug the Troops," but upon clicking the link one finds a giant yellow ribbon with the words "F*** the Troops" on it. There follows several anti-U.S. videos borrowed from YouTube and a line of text accusing U.S. troops of being "responsible for the slaughterings [sic] around the world." I am sad to report that at the time of this writing, this group had 109 members.

If there's an interent equivalent to kicking these guys in the nuts, I'd like to hear about it.

Posted by: Rusty at 01:41 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.

Allah has the video.

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:35 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.

The ACLU is suing a Kuwaiti diplomat over practicing slavery in the United States. Is this a sign that the ACLU will finally stop playing the dhimmi? I hope, but I'm not holding my breath. But at least they've drawn a line somewhere, and that line seems to be the very Islamic practice of slavery, which continues today.

While slavery has been officially abolished in all Islamic countries, the practice continues in various forms. The practice varies widely. In the Northern Sudan traditional slavery, where the children of blacks, Christians, and animists are openly bought and sold by Arabized Muslims, can be found. In the Gulf States, though, the practice is much more subtle--with "domestic servants" brought in from all over the world and then simply not paid, beaten, sexually abused, locked up, etc, with very little in the way of legal recourse.

It's interesting that the escaped slave, who was threatened by her Muslim master, didn't ask if the man was a cop, but rather if he was "a Christian". more...

Posted by: Rusty at 10:37 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 417 words, total size 3 kb.

A National Review Online article examining the questionable contributors to America's worst president's Carter Center includes this tidbit [emphasis added]:

Even in Carter’s long history of post-presidential grandstanding, this book sets fresh standards of irresponsibility. Purporting to give a balanced view of the Palestinian–Israeli conflict, Carter effectively shrugs off such highly germane matters as Palestinian terrorism. The hypocrisies are boundless, and include adoring praise of the deeply oppressive, religiously intolerant Saudi regime side by side with condemnations of democratic Israel. In one section, typical of the book’s entire approach, Carter includes a “Historical Chronology,” from Biblical times to 2006, in which he dwells on events surrounding his 1978 Camp David Accords but omits the Holocaust. Kenneth W. Stein, the founder of the Carter Center’s Middle East program, resigned last month to protest the book, describing it in a letter to Fox News as “replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments.” As this article goes to press, more protest resignations, this time from the Carter Center’s board of councilors, appear to be in the works.

Posted by: Bluto at 01:43 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 2 kb.

CNN has sold a Hummer they used in Iraq for charity. Proceeds will go help soldiers injured in Iraq.

(CNN) -- Proceeds from the sale of Warrior One, which toured military bases and medical centers nationwide before the auction, will be donated to the Fisher House Foundation. The organization temporarily houses families of patients receiving major medical care in military hospitals and Veterans Affairs facilities.

Dave Liniger, founder of Re/Max International Inc., had the winning bid of $1 million for the Hummer. An additional $250,000 was thrown in by Dave Ressler, a businessman from North Dakota and Montana.

Asked why he bought the vehicle, Liniger said he is a Vietnam veteran who started Re/Max with his wife, Gail, in 1973. The real estate company has grown to 65 countries, he said.

Juba Sucks!

Also see related post here at Gateway Pundit.

Truth is the IAI are terrorists. They and those who follow them support the murder of innocents and many other war crimes. It's a soft spot with me because I've seen them murder so many.

Posted by: Howie at 08:52 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.

LGF has a post up about whether Jimmy Carter sought leniency in 1987 for a Nazi SS prison guard known to have served at the notorious Mauthausen concentration camp. In the image below, I've placed the 1977 memo next to the handwriting on the 1987 letter. Below the images, I've placed similar words from the two docs adjacent to one another for comparison. Same handwriting? You be the judge (click image to enlarge):

Posted by: Ragnar at 05:54 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.

The latest pointless screed from Maureen Dowd :

President Bush has been dutifully making the rounds of TV news shows, trying to make the case that victory in Iraq is “doable.” He thinks the public will support the Surge if he can simply illuminate a few things that we may have been too thick to understand. For instance, he says he needs to “explain to people that what happens in the Middle East will affect the future of this country.” Yes, Mr. President, we get it.

He also told Jim Lehrer last night that in 20 years, radical Shiites could be warring with radical Sunnis and Middle Eastern oil could fall into the hands of radicals, who might also get weapons of mass destruction.

So after scaring Americans into backing the Sack of Iraq by warning that radicals could get W.M.D., now he’s trying to scare Americans into supporting the Surge in Iraq by warning that radicals could get W.M.D.

So many deaths, so little progress.

It’s unnerving to be tutored by an educator in chief who is himself being tutored. The president elucidating the Iraqi insurgency for us is learning about the Algerian insurgency from the man who failed to quell the Vietcong insurgency.

Posted by: Ragnar at 10:31 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 207 words, total size 1 kb.

Via Reuters: A federal appeals court vacated a 22-year prison sentence on Tuesday against "millennium bomber" Ahmed Ressam

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals based in San Francisco.

Hat Tip: George.

Posted by: Howie at 01:38 PM | Comments (23) | Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.

Alan Dershowitz shines the spotlight on Dhimmi Carter:

Journalist Jacob Laksin has documented the tens of millions of dollars that the Carter Center has accepted from Saudi Arabian royalty and assorted other Middle Eastern sultans, who, in return, Carter dutifully praised as peaceful and tolerant (no matter how despotic the regime). And these are only the confirmed, public donations.

Carter has also accepted half a million dollars and an award from Sheik Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan, saying in 2001: "This award has special significance for me because it is named for my personal friend, Sheik Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan." This is the same Zayed, the long-time ruler of the United Arab Emirates, whose $2.5 million gift to the Harvard Divinity School was returned in 2004 due to Zayed's rampant Jew-hatred. Zayed's personal foundation, the Zayed Center, claims that it was Zionists, rather than Nazis, who “were the people who killed the Jews in Europe” during the Holocaust. It has held lectures on the blood libel and conspiracy theories about Jews and America perpetrating Sept. 11.

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:48 AM | Comments (17) | Add Comment
Post contains 185 words, total size 1 kb.

This is so fucking beautiful, it brought tears to my eyes: more...

Posted by: Ragnar at 03:22 PM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 224 words, total size 2 kb.

Either way, they suck.

When Rogalin returned home from Iraq and contacted Public Storage to inquire about the status of his account (that he resumed paying as soon as all this was worked out) he was told that all his possessions had been sold back in June.

Posted by: Rusty at 12:55 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.

Here's some free advice to the barking-moonbats on the impeach Bush train: if you're going to do a beach event, make sure to bring in some ringers for the bikini contest.

Oh, and from what I understand, the tinfoil actually amplifies Rove's mind control rays.

Zombie has more firsthand reporting and more tinfoil wearing (literally) moonbats.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:18 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.

LGF has the story:

JEDDAH, 28 December 2006 — A two-day conference organized by the Makkah-based Muslim World League yesterday called for a consultative commission in order to take legal action against those who abuse Islam and its Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Islamic sanctities, at local and international courts of justice, the Saudi Press Agency said.

The conference titled “In Defense of the Prophet” called upon Islamic countries and governments to stand united to defend the Islamic faith and its Prophet. It denounced the smear campaigns to tarnish the image of the Prophet and urged Muslims to make all-out efforts to project the true picture of Islam and the great divine teachings of the Prophet.

This is coming, folks. Mark my words. When it comes, what will you do about it? Will you stand, or submit? Standing up is easy today. Few are being killed, or even sued, for speaking up. Doing the right thing is relatively EASY right now. Later on, it WON'T be so easy. Nevermind giving up your life, would you sacrifice your job, or your credit rating for freedom of speech, if you had to make a choice?

Suppose you wake up tomorrow and you read that Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer were murdered overnight by radical Muslims for "speaking against Islam." How do you react? Do you decide to redouble your efforts to counter the Islamist threat, or do you decide that it might be best to find a new hobby? If you don't know the answer, I suggest you should think very seriously about it.

Posted by: Ragnar at 12:30 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 403 words, total size 2 kb.

From Greg Gutfield at HuffPo:

Human Rights Watch, Moveon.org, ACT-UP, the Huffington Post and David Geffen are proud to present the March to Mecca, a celebration of peace that calls all gay brothers, sisters and people undergoing sex-reassignment to march to the holiest of holy cities, Mecca, the capital city of Saudi Arabia's Makkah province on Valentine's Day, February 14, 2007.

More fun here.

Posted by: Ragnar at 09:39 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.

In response to my earlier post on leftists carrying water for corporate media as regards the Jamil Hussein fiasco, a commenter threw up a barrage of non-sequiturs in the comments. I see similar types of "counter-arguments" regularly, so I thought this would be as good a time as any to take them on. Here they are:

"The Left are skeptical about Malkin because it's very obvious that her motive is not truth."

I can't speak to Michelle Malkin's motives, but her motives are irrelevant. Prominent bloggers in general, and Michelle Malkin in particular, are generally very accurate, but their track record on veracity has nothing to do with the quality of AP's reporting. Michelle Malkin could theoretically have a terrible track record for truth and still be 100% right as to the facts on THIS STORY. This story is not about Michelle Malkin, Curt, our own Dread Pundit Bluto or any of the other bloggers who have been doing great work on this one. Nobody is taking their word for anything. This is about AP's quality control (or rather, the lack thereof) and AP's inability to present ANY verifiable evidence that the events actually happened as they claim.

The "only evidence for [Michelle Malkin's] point of view was [a] press-release from CENTCOM and MOI."

Again, both WRONG and IRRELEVANT. The bloggers, including Michelle, have cited a number of sources to back up her reporting, including but not limited to official govt. sources. Even if they had only cited official government sources, it places the AP story in doubt, thus placing a burden on the AP to bolster their position with some piece of verifiable evidence. The fact that AP can't clear up the discrepancy after the passage of several weeks casts even more doubt on their original report.

Malkin has "shown that she doesn't care for truth and/or logical thinking so many times you just can't count."

Yet again, both wrong and irrelevant. The bloggers could be the most illogical people in the world and still convey accurate facts. This is fundamentally about factual accuracy, a complete lack of verifiable evidence and a long list of inconsistencies--even within AP's own reporting. Either the bloggers' facts and arguments ON THIS ISSUE hold up or they don't.

Update Uno By Vinnie: My friend Ragnar shows his youthfulness. I learned long ago that debating with left/liberals is pointless. You can't rationalize with the irrational. So I settled on a policy of just jumping into the swamp and flinging their own poo back at them. I do to them what they do to us, call them names, twist their arguments to fit my agenda, and in general try to make their lives miserable. Not that it's hard to do, most left/liberals wander around life abjectly miserable to begin with, and their mission is to make those of us who aren't, just like them. Unlike them, however, I fling poo with a wink and a smile, they do it with abject, undisguised hatred. Which, of course, is something they accuse us of.

Posted by: Ragnar at 05:30 PM | Comments (29) | Add Comment
Post contains 577 words, total size 4 kb.

As usual, Gingrich has it right:

MANCHESTER, N.H., Dec. 16 (UPI) -- Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told an audience in New Hampshire Muslim clerics pulled off a plane for praying should have been charged criminally.

Gingrich made the remark Friday night, as he delivered the keynote speech at the Manchester Republican City Committee Christmas dinner, the Manchester (N.H.) Union Leader reported.

Gingrich on GOP campaigns for 2008.

"Those six people should have been arrested and prosecuted for pretending to be terrorists," Gingrich said. "And the crew of the U.S. airplane should have been invited to the White House and congratulated for being correct in the protection of citizens."

Gingrich on MTP. REad what he actually says or podcasts here.

Hat Tips: Instaundit and The Moderate Voice.

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:29 PM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.

1 And Newt Gingrich should have been in the White House. What a different world it would be.

Posted by: Verkhovensky at December 18, 2006 12:31 AM (QKa+I)

2 So many people say, "I would love to vote for Newt, but he can't win". I wonder if all of those people actually voted for him if he could actually win.
 
Whadda youse guys think?

Posted by: TBinSTL at December 18, 2006 02:38 AM (MSiPb)

3 Why is this Gingrich person saying these terrible things? Does he want me to vote for him or something?

But based on the collected information, yes, they were trying to play 'terrorist' and no doubt thought it was all good fun. They should be standing too close to the 'pod races' in my opinion (snicker)!

I'd buy any member of the crew a drink! They done good, and they deserve credit.

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 18, 2006 04:29 AM (2OHpj)

4

I think I'm liking what Newt's saying more and more.  

Posted by: Buzzy at December 18, 2006 09:27 AM (CXz7T)

5 OUTLAW ISLAM

Posted by: Greyrooster at December 18, 2006 09:31 AM (95kFq)

6 Send Newt to the UN.

Posted by: Fred Fry at December 18, 2006 10:26 AM (JXdhy)

7 You guys are fucking stupid.

Posted by: Frank Hunter at December 18, 2006 11:20 AM (nsWyt)

8 You have so little respect for the law that you arrest people for pretending to be terrorists? Or are you disappointed that the Muslim Menace has not struck again to justify your poisonous view?
Perhaps Newt should be arrested for pretending to be an American.
 
 

Posted by: kindlingman at December 18, 2006 12:36 PM (xkrcF)

9 Hey kindlingman:
"You have so little respect for the law that you arrest people for pretending to be terrorists?"
Dude. Pretending to be group of terrorists at an airport/on a plane is clearly shoutng fire in a crowded theater. Worse, actually.
Since it is likely to induce fear/terror, it is in itself a terrorist act!
 
Love the way UPI mischaracterized the entire incident, too. They were NOT arrested for praying.
 

Posted by: gnark at December 18, 2006 12:46 PM (6cnyO)

10 Please don't call me  'Dude'.
My point is that the law has a purpose other than punishing the acts of people we do not like. The posting directly below this one is condemnatory that Iranians who converted to Christianity were arrested. My point applies here also. Using the law to punish the acts of people we do not like makes the law absurd.
I was using the same absurd principle in my snark by claiming that Newt should be arrested for pretending to be an American.
 
 
 

Posted by: kindlingman at December 18, 2006 02:29 PM (xkrcF)

11 Dude - I think your snark sucked.
 
Get the fuck out of here you ambulating turd.

Posted by: Max Power at December 18, 2006 03:05 PM (PM8kH)

12

Max, your opinion has no value with me. Your invective resembles the worth of your words.

Posted by: kindlingman at December 18, 2006 03:15 PM (xkrcF)

13 kindlingman, if I pretend I have a gun, and threaten you, it is against the law. It is considered assault. What these Imams did was little different, and yes, Gingrich has a good point.

Once in my younger days, some college friends, and tag-alongs decided to play a game called 'Killer', which was a game of assassination employing waterpistols, plastic dart guns, and stuff.

On this occassion, we had teams, and we were playing downtown. The Mission was sort of a 'capture the flag' buy pieces. Some of the other team had parts of some 'top secret material' and the team that collected their parts first would win. Some random 'agents' were part of the game, so you wouldn't know who to trust. It was fun.

In round one, we used a strategy of mine, and even thiough I was my teams first casualty, my team won.

In round two, we didn't finish the game, because some of the players ran across the glass window front of a BANK, carrying fake Uzi water guns!

Guess who showed up and shut us down? The cops.

You know what? It's kinda scary having an officer giving you 'that look' wih his hand on top of his holster, but he was doing his job.

I met Steve Jackson, the publisher of the 'killer' game rules at a regional convention. I learned my experience wasn't unique. Jackson, and friends had confined their activities to the site of a convention, and hotel facility. The hotel staff, and local police had been notified about the activities. In the course of play, jackson 'killed' an opposing target, who proceeded to fall down in a dramitic 'death scene'. As Jackson stooped to pick up the little paper that confirmed his 'kill', he heard a deep authoritarian voice yell for him to freeze.

Now he was playing a game where the participants 'shoot' at each other. Its like adult 'cops and robbers'. He almost spun with waterpistol blazing, but something in the voice made him hesitate, and instead, he raised his hands, and dropped his 'weapon'. As he turned slowly around, two police were pointing ready pistols, right at him! They were just doing their job as well.

We have to expect our authotities will act decisively in a crises. We also have to expect that the authorities will detain, and question suspicious characters. If they arrest someone who created a sense of danger, even by accident, they are correct. The truely dangerous among them will not be carrying water pistols, and in such a case, are not likely to be playing games.

What the Imams did, qualifies. If I can get stopped by armed cops while playing with squirt guns, Imams can get stopped for playing 'terrorist'.

I think this is the part where you hand me the little paper confirming my 'kill'.

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 18, 2006 04:20 PM (2OHpj)

14 Dude, they don't need to limit freedom of speech. They just need to apply the treason law in these United States. Death at dawn by firing squad for those pretending to be terrorists, The New York times, and CNN for supporting terror, groups like the ACLU, and CAIR for supporting terrorist rights, and any other acts of treason by individuals who hate this country.

Posted by: Leatherneck at December 18, 2006 04:20 PM (ZOc4K)

15 kindlingman, you simply can't compare the arrests in Iran, with arresting Imams for playing 'terrorist'.

They folks in Iran, will probabluy be killed according to Sharia law.

The Imams in this case could have gotten a hearing, and a trial, and probably released with only a misdemeanor or two that would stick. The point is that creating terror intentionally, is criminal. this isn't about free speech, or religion. If you want to know how I feel about those things, read my other comments.

Iran's case is about repression of anything but Islam, according to Sharia. The airline case is about people not causing a public nuisance at the very least. Big difference. Are you trying to intentionally be deceptive?

So what if I pretend to have a gun, and poke it into your back without saying anything? Am I commiting a crime?

USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at December 18, 2006 04:27 PM (2OHpj)

16 Kindergartenman:


Talk about a strawman argument. (You left-wing hypocrites love that phrase. You also love using strawman arguments.) Pretending to be a terrorist is against the law, you fucking ignoramus.


_{"Are you disappointed that the Muslim Menace has not struck again to justify your poisonous view?"}


Uh...... you mean our view that America needs to practice national security against terrorism? The view that you leftist traitors have fought against tooth and nail? Is that the view you're referring to? The only ones disappointed that the islamic (not muslim, retard,) menace has not struck again are lefties. Deeply disappointed.


There is no moral equivalency between murdering people who abandon the death cult (literally,) of islam, and arresting terrorists for breaking the law. Look up the legal definition of terrorism in the criminal code, shit for brains.


You should be arrested for impersonating an American--bitch. Aren't you happy I didn't call you dude?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 18, 2006 08:26 PM (bLPT+)

17 The claim was that the flying imams should be arrested for pretending to be terrorists. Make your case. What terrorist behaviors (that this blog talks about almost every day) were exhibited by this group of men? And which of these behaviors are criminal? Cite your source, please.  

Posted by: kindlingman at December 18, 2006 08:31 PM (RNsGP)

18 I love it when the lefturds do my job for me. By the time I show up to
harangue the mob, one or two of them have already made my point that a
good lefturd is a dead one.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 18, 2006 08:36 PM (v3I+x)

19 Kindergartenman:


Pretending to be a terrorist on a plane is illegal. If you say in jest that you're a terrorist, or that you have a bomb, you have committed a federal crime. Trying to terrorize people with your actions is a federal crime on a plane or off. Again, check the federal and state criminal codes, dip-shit.


As you mentioned, this blog has stories on the actions of the imams, dumb-ass. I'm not surprised you aren't familiar with what they did. You'll never hear the facts at your usual left-wing haunts. Facts and logic are anathema to the left.


The miserable islamopithecine pricks started praying loudly and disruptively in the boarding area, with their ridiculous rugs blocking other ticket holders. As they boarded, they praised Bin loser and cursed America. When they were on the plane, a passenger who understands the pig grunts and hawking loogie language of Arabic overheard them praising terrorism, and notified a stewardess. They requested seat belt extenders even though they weren't fat enough to need them--just like the 911 terrorists did. (The 911 pussies used them as weapons and restraining devices against the passengers.) They started ullulating and praising allah loudly and obnoxiously. They got out of their seats and moved all around the cabin while the seatbelt sign was on, deliberately trying to spook the passengers. Several of them would go in the same restroom at one time, just like the 911 hijackers did. They then sat in the same seats that the 911 hijackers sat in--seats that weren't assigned to them.


All of them have prior histories of pressing phony discrimination lawsuits or close ties with known terrorists.


Do you still think they're innocent, shit for brains? Even if you don't, you'll claim they are, because you're an America-last leftist, and you reflexively defend every enemy of America.


Don't even think about demanding to know how I know you're an America last leftist, much less try denying it.


United Airlines isn't going to pay those goldigging terrorist vermin a penny. They obviously staged the entire event with the intention of suing the airline and eroding national security standards. Along with CAIR, they are jihadi terrorists trying to weaken our country and advance islam against the Constitution.


They need to be jailed (preferably executed,) but even though our pussy government (Dhimmiecrats especially,) will likely give them a free pass, United Airlines will probably nail them in a counter suit.


Only enemies of this country are willing to defend the flying imams, but you already know that, don't you, quisling?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 19, 2006 01:35 AM (bLPT+)

20 I have been exposed. I am so ashamed. I am an American who thinks people should not be arrested unless they actually commit a crime. I will never forget the lesson here. It is not enough to eject suspicious people off a plane, they must be arrested for pretending to be terrorists. That will show them that we mean business. Harrumph! 

Posted by: kindlingman at December 19, 2006 05:56 AM (RNsGP)

21 Kindergartenman:


You have indeed been exposed. The flying imams broke several laws, and they are most definitely terrorists.


You're probably one of those assholes who thinks only the wog with the bomb is a terrorist, and not the legions who support him. Planning, funding, sheltering, defending, or otherwise aiding and abeting terrorists are terrorist acts, although American law is slow on recognizing many forms of terrorist aid.


You must be so proud that the 911 terrorists weren't ejected and arrested. Fucking cunt.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 20, 2006 04:49 AM (bLPT+)

Hide Comments | Add Comment