June 11, 2007
According to tax documents obtained by The Times, the number of reported members spiraled down from more than 29,000 in 2000 to less than 1,700 in 2006, a loss of membership that caused the Muslim rights group's annual income from dues to drop from $732,765 in 2000, when yearly dues cost $25, to $58,750 last year, when the group charged $35.CAIR only has about 1,700 dues paying member and they want you to believe that they speak for Muslim Americans? My estimation of the vast majority of Muslims that I know is that they would never have anything to do with an organization as vile as CAIR. Now I know I was right.The organization instead is relying on about two dozen individual donors a year to contribute the majority of the money for CAIR's budget, which reached nearly $3 million last year.
It kind of makes you wonder why the MSM takes CAIR seriously? Keep an eye out for tomorrow's report. Note to Professor Chaos: buy Washington Times tomorrow.
PS--So, who are these two dozen mysterious donors that keep CAIR afloat?
Posted by: Rusty at
03:10 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 11, 2007 04:26 PM (j97MF)
Posted by: greyrooster at June 11, 2007 04:29 PM (GdeYP)
Just throwing it out there. There's prolly much more to add to that.
Posted by: cadetwithchips at June 11, 2007 04:45 PM (FPAKD)
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at June 11, 2007 04:50 PM (+x54M)
Ya know, this is a situation that's just ripe for the picking. With CAIR's membership so low, I figure we could all institute a hostile take-over.
All we need is enough infidels to join up, pay the dues, then kick the leadership out and run things the way WE say they ought to be run... heh.
What say you? Anyone else up for giving those bastards the old heave-ho? Besides which, if we took over, WE could get all the trade mark rights, copyrights, etc. The mind reels at the potential for much playful mischief and skull-duggery.
Respects,
Posted by: Gwedd at June 11, 2007 05:24 PM (jve12)
Posted by: cadetwithchips at June 11, 2007 06:03 PM (FPAKD)
Posted by: Professor Chaos at June 11, 2007 06:18 PM (QcT7w)
Posted by: greyrooster at June 11, 2007 06:23 PM (1ZyKh)
Posted by: Fred Fry at June 11, 2007 07:46 PM (Cxqd0)
Posted by: Mark at June 11, 2007 11:41 PM (41Rkx)
Posted by: Howie at June 12, 2007 10:58 AM (YHZAl)
Posted by: allahakchew at June 12, 2007 04:21 PM (m2p07)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at June 12, 2007 04:33 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 13, 2007 03:56 AM (2OHpj)
in order to find a new way to attack us from behind, which is better
suited to their cowardly nature.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 16, 2007 11:05 AM (e56vj)
34 queries taking 0.079 seconds, 170 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.