1
Haw haw! Does your 'club' have a name? If your trying for a 'birdy', or a 'hole in one' I'd like to wish you good hunting, and I hope you do better than 'par' for the course.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 27, 2007 04:14 PM (2OHpj)
The NRSC needs to be de-funded. At the very least, it needs to see a serious drop in support. It's become a slush fund to support connected insiders who aren't sufficiently palatable to attract money from the grassroots.
Save your money. The good guys won't have trouble raising money. The RINOs need to be starved out. But when I say "save," I mean it. Put that money aside to support solid conservative primary candidates against idiots like Lindsey Graham and Pete Domenici.
Nine Targets
This is a list of the nine Republican senators who voted FOR cloture on amnesty and are up for re-election next year:
Stevens (R-AK)
Dominici (R-NM)
Collins (R-ME)
Coleman (R-MN)
Craig (R-ID)
McConnell (R-KY)
Hagel (R-NE)
Graham (R-SC)
Warner (R-VA)
EVERY SINGLE ONE of these individuals needs to face a solid primary challenger this next Spring.
It needs to be made clear to the party apparatus in each of the above states that these men are not likely to be returned to office in November 2008. Many of the GOP faithful will not be voting for these guys under any circumstances in the general. In fact, I have no doubt that at least some conservatives will be working for the opposition if these guys make it back to the general election. The party operatives in these senators' states need to start hearing this message right now. They need to start to understand that returning any of these men to the general ballot will equal a loss in November. If the party hopes to keep these seats in Republican hands, they would be well-advised to cut these men loose.
1
I can't speak for the other 8, but I can tell you we're working on solid opposition here in SC against Lindsey Grahamnesty. Just a matter of time, since his poll numbers have dropped to the low 30s.
He has a ton of money to spend on lipstick, but amnesty will still hang about his neck like a millstone.
Posted by: JDinSC at June 27, 2007 09:29 AM (ywj30)
There are rumours that Warner is retiring and that Congressman Tom Davis will run for the seat, I notified Warner's office yesterday that just because he no longer wants to be Senator that it would not be in keeping with the Republican Party to allow the American public to suffer when he is gone and that I personally would hold Tom Davis responsible if he Warner votes for this bill. Congressman Tom Davis's office said he is against this legislation and I suggested to them perhaps they need to have a conversation with Senator Warners office.
Posted by: Jaded at June 27, 2007 09:43 AM (ElLn4)
3
2008 will not be an easy year for Republican senators While twice as many seats as the Democrats are for grabs the Republicans have twice as much to lose as the Democrats.
Out of that list of nine 4, Stevens, Collins, Warner and Hagel have always easily defeated their Democrat opponents. The Democrats came within inches of losing Lieberman to the Republicans and that would of cost them control of the Senate. In the other 5 races the Democrats should have a fair chance of winning. Forcing out your best candidates may not be the best way to hold seats. And although the much touted congressional approval ratings are at historic lows we must remember that the individual approval ratings of members of Congress do not show the same ratings. Americans LIKE their own members of Congress, we just hate the ones that were elected by other states (in general). Of course the overriding issue in 2008 will be Iraq.
Posted by: John Ryan at June 27, 2007 11:13 AM (TcoRJ)
4
When I read a list of politurd's names after the words Nine Targets, I got a little bit woody, but then was disappointed.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 27, 2007 02:28 PM (jQsc/)
1
I have been sending back their fund raising stuff for the last year with "Fix the fucking borders" scrawled across it but the other day I actually got a fund raising letter from McCain. Was not nice what I wrote on that one.
Posted by: Randman at June 26, 2007 06:42 PM (Sal3J)
2
Its an excellent post. Thanks Ragnar, and USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 26, 2007 07:19 PM (2OHpj)
3
Not ready to turn my back on the only party that attempts (at times) to answer the call of conservatism. Not supporting the Republican party helps the libturd democrats. Better to work from within. I continue to contribute but I do ask them why.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 08:17 PM (xFKOj)
And Then There Were Seven...National Review identifies seven senators who could stop amnesty:
Stopping amnesty is entirely within the power of senators who oppose it. Later today, the Senate will vote on whether to proceed on the bill. To revive the once-stalled bill will require 60 votes, which means that if the senators who vote no and the senators who don’t vote add up to 41, the bill is dead. The best vote count now has 33 no votes plus the non-vote of the ill Sen. Tim Johnson. Assuming this count is accurate, only seven more are needed to stop amnesty.
They are Sens. Kit Bond, Sam Brownback, Richard Burr, Thad Cochran, Norm Coleman, John Ensign, and Jim Webb. If any of these senators votes to revive the bill, his professions of opposition to amnesty should no longer be taken seriously. He will have done his crucial bit, when the amnesty bill was most vulnerable, to help shepherd it to passage. We know how senators who claim to oppose amnesty will try to explain away a vote to revive the bill. They will rely on procedural obfuscation: They didn’t want to obstruct the process, they wanted to get a vote on an amendment, etc. But amnesty is staying in the bill — no amendment to strike the bill’s central features has any chance of passage — and it deserves to be obstructed.
That amnesty hotline, btw, is: 800-882-2005 (en espanol) or 800-417-7666 (en englais).
1
Are all races and countries included in this anmesty bill? Are people just being bigots toward our brown brothers from the south who come here to work. No one upset about the muslim immigrants coming here to kill us? WEIRD! WEIRD! Jose wants to work. Mohammed wants to kill us, The Haitians want our welfare. And everyone wants Jose's ass. He's humble, He's small in statue, He's broke, He's been kicked around all his life. Let's pile on and stomp him good. But let us be very quite about the muslims and africans. They may fight back. Or at least act like they would. Bigots, racists. Go over to Stromtroopers. They hate the Mexicans too.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 08:24 AM (KtHtq)
2
If they can stop this amnesty then they are THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN
Posted by: sandpiper at June 26, 2007 10:56 AM (Dutrh)
1
Phoned Cochran's office today. Couldn't get anyone except a volunteer who could not nothing but apologize and assure me the Cochran is looking at the BIG picture. BULLSHIT! Trent Lott now Cochran. Get a rope.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 09:34 PM (xFKOj)
1
22% favor amnesty bill. Sounds like our Latin American population is now at 22%. Hope someone realizes we are being invaded on the east coast as well as the west.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 09:36 PM (xFKOj)
Dunkin' Donuts Asks For Federal Help
In this topsy-turvy world in which we live, I wouldn't be surprised to see the judge tell them they're not allowed to follow the law, but I'm glad to see they're trying:
[Dunkin' Donuts has] filed a lawsuit in federal court asking a judge to terminate the franchise agreement it has with two stores in Central Jersey, saying the owners knowingly accepted false documents, used false Social Security numbers and paid employees in cash.
The company has filed similar lawsuits seeking to sever ties with franchises in Boston, Atlanta and Florida, where it is has accused three franchises of hiring illegal immigrants.
The lawsuits come a year after Dunkin’ Donuts became the most well-known corporation to enroll in Basic Pilot, a voluntary U.S. Department of Homeland Security program that allows employers to perform electronic document checks to verify that applicants are eligible to work.
Under the Senate bill, the electronic verification program, currently used by less than 1 percent of all U.S. businesses, would become mandatory.
God Bless Dunkin' Donuts. I wish them the best on this.
Labor and Hispanic groups yesterday told senators to scrap their immigration bill and go back to the drawing board, saying that the proposal now before the Senate has become too harsh on illegal aliens and a poor deal for U.S. workers.
In separate press conferences, the Hispanic rights groups and labor leaders, including the AFL-CIO, joined a growing group of critics from both the left and the right who say current law is better than the immigration bill that President Bush and a small bipartisan group of senators are pushing.
"This takes a problem we have and, instead of solving it, makes it worse," said Richard L. Trumka, secretary-treasurer of the AFL-CIO. He said the temporary-worker program that the bill sets up would hurt U.S. workers by providing a source of cheap labor that would depress Americans' wages.
Meanwhile from the immigrant-advocacy side, a handful of Hispanic groups yesterday said the Senate bill started off poorly, became worse after the first two weeks of amendments and is now unfixable.
1
HEH..this is great. For once the ends of Cons meets the means of Libs... Their methodology is a bit funny though: "saying that the proposal now before the Senate has become too harsh on illegal aliens and a poor deal for U.S. workers.
heh...like saying: "I want to eat my fucking DEVILS FOOD CAKE WITH DOUBLE CHOCOLATE FUDGE ICING SMOTHERED IN CARAMEL AND TRIPLE WHIPPED WHIP CREAM...but I DON'T want it to have any calories....DAMNIT!~!~"
libs are bunch of backward ****s aren't they..
Posted by: mrclark at June 24, 2007 01:37 AM (Uip+N)
2
I'm an eye surgeon on a far-away Pacific protectorate of the US, the island of Saipan. The possibility of implementation of a federal immigration laws is rocking this island to its core. One sane opinion is posted at Marianas Eye.
If the hyperlink doesn't work, its www.MarianasEye.blogspot.com
Posted by: David at June 24, 2007 08:24 AM (zwzEG)
3
David, you are obviously a bit of a narcissist. Also, your blog is a snoozer and please stop using the Jawa Comments to promote it.
Posted by: Narcissism Alert at June 24, 2007 09:08 AM (b0FZu)
4
I guess it dont go far enough to satisfi them they wants to return part of this nation back to mexico their all guilty of treason we realy need a bill to prohibit illegal imagration intirly and make their nation of origion back for their return
Posted by: sandpiper at June 24, 2007 10:14 AM (h6CK1)
5
Well take it from a good ole boy from Washington DC Mississippi! Why give me a good ole electricified goat fence any ole time! When any unruly talk-radio-listening members of the RNC try to give me any grief over immigration, I say just pop 'em in the balls with that li'l live wire!
Sincerely, Trent Sux a LOTT
Posted by: JihadGene at June 24, 2007 11:21 PM (l8Hl5)
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 07:46 AM (KtHtq)
7
David: Saipan, Tinian. Love them. Go every year. Millions of Japanese looking for a good time can't be wrong..
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 10:09 PM (xFKOj)
8
David: A funny one. I fell into the bar pool at the Hyatt Regency, Saipan fully clothed. Had a friend. The one that pushed me, go upstairs, get me my swimsuit, changed in the pool and no one noticed. Now thats class. Love bird island. Nice casino on Tinian and the islands favorite sport. Just don't tell anyone. I will announce my next trip there. Perhaps, I can buy you a drink.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 10:30 PM (xFKOj)
9
Oh! And Mr. Khorram. I have heard about the school. Perhaps, I can help in some small way.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 10:39 PM (xFKOj)
4
Anyone who wants to see Bill O'Reilly's head explode on national tv, should send him this link. That man would be on a MISSION, after seeing something like this. Hell, Hannity would probably track them all down and eviscerate them with a spork.
"It's clobberin' time!" I think that someone ought to send copies of this video to as many newspapers and TV stations as possible, especially ones who have craven "investigative teams" that enjoy watching folks squirm.
Respects,
Posted by: Gwedd at June 24, 2007 11:13 AM (xsmhm)
6
What is the motivation to not hire americans -- to save a dollar?
Sick. Despicable.
So glad this is on tape to show the world what is really going on.
So, thiiiiiiiiisssssss is the kind of thing that is behind George Bush's manic push for amnesty?
Posted by: gunjam at June 24, 2007 07:40 PM (FpJww)
7
gunjam: Exactly. But if this practice is so terrible, why is California the 6th largest economy in the world. Who would pick the lettuce. Who would cut the grapes in Nancy Pelosi's vineyard. Who would work in Nancy Pelosi's hotels. Who would work in Nancy Pelosi's Restaurants. I won't. Those on welfare won't. Mexicans will. Therefore: Just joking. I am for a much more dehumanizing program (liberals 1970's) called the bracero program. Mexicans can come here to work. Receive a fair wage and go home with our thanks. Don't even have to learn English.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 10:24 PM (xFKOj)
And, since you can't see IP addresses, you're now the official House Liar.
Sucks to be you.
Posted by: Vinnie at June 23, 2007 07:49 PM (eSoLw)
3
But you do all the sucking. Right. Excuse me if I infringe on your lying rights. But you've been lying to yourself all your life. Now be truthful and go get that sex change operation you've always wanted.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 23, 2007 07:58 PM (1p01H)
VideoFest: ANSWER, Brown Supremecists Get Pwn3d By Various Patriots
A few months old, but perfect for some weekend red meat.
Starting off, we have ANSWER and various brown supremacist groups and individuals rallying for illegal immigration and against three incarcerated border agents. They get confronted by a group of Lindsay Graham's America-supporting bigots. We soon see, however, who the real bigots and totalitarians are.
Watch more anti-illegal protestors (otherwise known as patriots) get nearly assaulted and barraged with hate by brown supremacists, illegals and illegal-immigrant supporters - in LA, USA - below the fold. There are a handful of other videos there to get your blood pressure up as well.
Who are the haters? Whose country is this? Who cares, say the friggin' jackasses in Congress! Let 'em all in! They're patriots, hating the legal Americans that legal Americans refuse to hate! Go Team Bush! Tell the bigots to shut up, Lindsay (if you can even identify them)!
WATCH VIDS BELOW THE FOLD (ALL VIDEOS FILMED IN AMERICA) -->
more...
We even get this La Raza crap up here in Maine. it's brought in, like most diseases, by outsiders, usually, but not always, college students.
As much as I love my state, I'm thinking that it's a lost cause here and maybe it's time to move.
Respects,
Posted by: Gwedd at June 23, 2007 10:43 AM (xsmhm)
5
But Europe is now inhabited by Africans, Asians and muslims. We can't go back. Anyone ever thought of telling the Mexicans how beautiful Europe is? The high wages? The 35 hr work week in France? Hmmmm. I may be on to something here.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 23, 2007 06:59 PM (1p01H)
6
Why are you racists again picking on the poor Mexicans. All you racists should be banned.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 23, 2007 07:49 PM (1p01H)
Illegal Immigration Amnesty Plan Sinking?
John Hawkin's "source" thinks so.
Because of this issue, my source tells me that the vote for the "clay pigeon" strategy is no longer a slam dunk and it is possible that the "grand bargainers" may not be able to get 60 votes to put the bill on the floor as a new bill. If that turns out to be the case, the bill is dead....
My source tells me that he thought the amnesty proponents definitely had the upper hand last week, but now, he thinks the momentum may be swinging back the other way.
When bloggers have "sources", the revolution truly has begun......
Posted by: mrclark at June 22, 2007 02:11 PM (HIkp6)
2
Okay, the bill is dead. Does that mean we continue the status quo allowing millions more cross our borders? What the hell are we happy about? Nothing achieved.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 22, 2007 08:55 PM (k0DWG)
3
The real immigration problem is blue staters flooding into red states, with no end in site. We need to seal off Arizona and Nevada or blue staters will keep coming. The Florida border must be sealed so liberal New Yorkers do not make it past South Carolina. I pray the President acts quickly.
Anyway, I would consider it an honor and a privilege if you would add my blog "The Tygrrrr Express" www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com to your list of linked sites if you feel the quality is high.
I came across your blog through Michelle Malkin's website, since I enjoy her writing.
Hutchison Planning to Vote Against Cloture?
Captain Ed says she is:
One of the key Senators in [the moderate swing] group is Kay Bailey Hutchison. Being from Texas, one of the border states most affected by immigration issues, her input on this bill may carry significant weight on the rest of the undecideds. If so, the bill's backers may have a real problem on their hands. A Senate source told me a few minutes ago that Hutchison intends to vote against cloture, and will have a statement to that effect later today.
1
I called Senator Hutchison's Office number in D.C. this morning at about 0820hrs Pacific, phone# (202)224-5922, and talked to a male (unknown). I was told, by him, that she was against the immigration bill. Hope it's true!
Posted by: JihadGene at June 21, 2007 05:42 PM (l8Hl5)
2
Funny how when I called Senator Trent-I'vebeenaPublicServant35years-Lott's office this morning, all I got was a recording saying his message center/voice mail was full. Fu*K Lott a whole lot!!! FU*K YEAH!!!
Posted by: JihadGene at June 21, 2007 05:49 PM (l8Hl5)
3
So, that nasty email I sent her might have done some good afterall.
4
I'm going to go ahead and take credit for this if it's okay with everyone. After all, it did come after I sent an email notifying her of me and all of my friends who will be voting for even the most liberal Democrat in order to get her out of office should she vote for cloture or the bill.
Your thanks are all I ask for. Cash would be a good 2nd choice.
Posted by: slug at June 21, 2007 10:04 PM (BYQ7l)
5
Well...I am glad our bitching has had some effect for Kay Bailey. Now if she just does go wobbly on us.
Posted by: Randman at June 21, 2007 10:27 PM (Sal3J)
Americans give both President Bush and the Congress failing marks on their handling of immigration, according to a new UPI/Zogby poll on the topic.
The Zogby Interactive poll of 8,300 adults nationwide finds just 3% of Americans viewing Congress’s handling of the immigration issue in favorable terms, while 9% say the same of the President-even as respondents in the survey rated it the second most important issue facing the country, after the war in Iraq.
Does Reid Have 61 Cloture Votes? Reports Say He Does.
Via Allah:
If you believe Senate staffers, first he decided he was going to let only 24 amendments come to the floor and then he “sold†16 of those slots to the bill’s critics in exchange for their pledge to vote for cloture when the time came. He already had 45 votes banked; according to the AP, the 16 new amendments “come from senators who helped derail the legislation earlier this month,†which strongly suggests that all of them voted against cloture the first time. Specifically named are Kit Bond, Barbara Boxer, John Ensign, Jim Webb, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Max Baucus, Jon Tester, Claire McCaskill, Chuck Grassley, John Thune, Norm Coleman, and Bernie Sanders.
More from the Capitolist:
immigration reform 2.0.: 22 ammendments, 11 dem, 11 rep. anyone who introduces an ammendment has pledged to vote for cloture. dorgan's ammendment is in. hutchison is on board. pay to play, legislative style.
1
Employer laws are cheaper to build than a fence. We didn't seem to have much of a problem back when it was illegal to hire undocumented workers and the law was enforced...
Posted by: tbone at June 20, 2007 01:14 PM (HGqHt)
2
How would employer laws prevent illegals from attacking border patrol agents? the illegals shown in the video are ignoring both. Just because a law is passed doesn't mean it will be obeyed, which is sorta the whole problem with the pro-amnesty argument.
And when, exactly, were the employer laws "enforced?" Why do they need an overhaul if they're working already?
Posted by: Good Lt at June 20, 2007 01:31 PM (yMbfY)
3
I agree Good LT, I just don't see a fence doing much besides costing us more money - if they know they wont be able to find a job (because employers are too scared to get caught hiring them) then most wont bother. As I understand it this was mostly the scenario pre 1970. And it's not like there are NO jobs in Mexico, just not ones paying as much as in the US. I keep reading reports that Mexico actually needs immigrants to cover all the emigrants...
Posted by: tbone at June 20, 2007 03:07 PM (HGqHt)
4
As a Texan who lives in a border county, you can imagine my felling's about where my Senators stand in all of this. Then again, perhaps not.
Just to be clear then, I believe that BP agents should be able to summarily drop any illegal who does not fully cooperate in their s#!+, no questions asked.
Posted by: Hucbald at June 20, 2007 04:33 PM (6vhVW)
A Message from Senator Cornyn's Office
In response to a prior post, I received a message from a staffer in Senator Cornyn's office which included the following:
Senator Cornyn is NOT "in negotiations to trade away his vote on cloture."
Given that this message comes directly from the Senator's office, and the staffer in question speaks for the Senator himself, I was apparently in error on this point.
I based my original post on certain reports that Senator Cornyn was engaged with other senators in negotiations with the leadership to work out a compromise on pending amendments and cloture.
Under the compromise deal as I have understood it, certain senators would agree to allow a final roll call vote on the bill in exchange for the chance to bring certain amendments to the floor. In other words, these senators would agree not to filibuster the bill if the amendments were given a fair hearing. Put another way, the senators would agree to vote for cloture if the leadership would agree to consider the amendments.
My understanding that Cornyn was a part of this compromise arose out of quotes like the following:
"The irony is if he (Reid) had given us another couple of days and an opportunity to vote on a dozen amendments, I think we could have concluded the vote," Cornyn said.
There have also been a number of news reports along the lines of the following:
The Republicans he will likely be targeting include Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chambliss, both of Georgia, who were closely involved in drafting the deal but have yet to fully commit, and perhaps John Ensign of Nevada and John Cornyn of Texas, who are undecided.
Procedurally, Senate backers of the measure and their staffs will attempt to work out a compromise on nearly a dozen GOP amendments, clearing the obstacle [i.e., failure of cloture] that doomed the legislation last week.
Based on reports similar to these in combination with the many reports that Senator Cornyn is a key negotiator on passage of the bill, I concluded that Cornyn was negotiating to vote for cloture in exchange for consideration of a group of preferred amendments. Given the unequivocal statement above from Senator Cornyn's office, I can only conclude that Senator Cornyn has NOT placed his cloture vote on the table for negotiation, and my earlier suggestions otherwise were in error. I apologize for any confusion.
1
I hope to God he is being truthful we here in the bigot world need something to hold on to within our party.
Posted by: Jaded at June 19, 2007 03:05 PM (0lpqx)
2
I don't know. I have a hard time believing he would go along. I mean if that was intention it sure wouldn't make any sense that he has been writing all those anti-amnesty articles for NRO and all.
Posted by: Randman at June 19, 2007 03:47 PM (Sal3J)
3
Well, maybe its not up for negotiation, because he's already decided to vote for it?
All I know is, if he votes for cloture, I will vote AGAINST HIM in EVERY election he runs in from now on. Same goes for Hutchinson.
Like you said Rusty, we have LOOOOOOooonnnng memories.
Posted by: JarvisW at June 19, 2007 06:15 PM (faim5)
4
You mean long jaded memories, Jarvis? Cornyn has been the conservative hero when it comes to this and many other issues, but someone gets a whiff that he might be doing something slightly odd and suddenly it's time to jump down his throat? As long as someone's doing something RIGHT, it gets ignored, but do something wrong and there's no forgiveness. ::le sigh:: Given the good senator's history, I'd say you did actually get this one wrong, Ragnar. However, I was wrong about Ron Paul, and I could be wrong about Cornyn. I just want to stay optimistic. Cornyn has been on our side of this issue the whole time, and I just can't fathom why'd he'd suddenly start pitching for the other team.
Posted by: Rep J at June 19, 2007 11:16 PM (xQq4i)
5
Cornyn seems extremely squishing. Just be ready to take back your apology and release the Dogs of War.
Posted by: Jabba the Tutt at June 19, 2007 11:16 PM (M0h+m)
Killing the Innocents Americans Refuse to Kill
Yet another victim of an illegal immigrant...sorry, "undocumented American...," running over the American citizens that Americans refuse to run over.
The murder weapon:
The victim:
The murderer, who in addition to being here illegally, had a criminal record:
Condolences to the family. Its OK, though. Lindsay Graham, Trent Lott and George W. Bush are gonna tell the bigots to shut up, while doing what's right for America.
1
Oh come on. That's carrying it to far. Americans get drunk and kill people too. This is not an exclusively immigrant problem. It's an idiot problem.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 19, 2007 01:33 PM (cuZRd)
2
Was she killed by a driver here illegally or not?
Posted by: Good Lt at June 19, 2007 02:04 PM (yMbfY)
3
Work in law enforcement. One of our officers had his vehicle rear ended this weekend. No one was hurt. However the driver had a large number of aliases, three prior DUI's and had been previously deported twice.
No this isn't exclusive to the illegals. But the other issue is that they tend to have a large number of different names and dob's they use making it difficult to keep track and making it easier for them to skip out. This kind of behaviour should not be rewarded by giving them amnesty.
Posted by: Waste at June 19, 2007 02:06 PM (1OUiB)
1
Oh come on. That's carrying it to far. Americans get drunk and kill
people too. This is not an exclusively immigrant problem. It's an idiot
problem. ==================== Get serious. The fact is if this foreign invader weren't here, maybe she would have been killed by an American citizen in the same manner -- but the odds aren't with it.
Build the wall, make it tall.
Posted by: Mike Cummings at June 19, 2007 02:36 PM (8zaZ2)
6
And if Americans didn't drive cars there wouldn't be any accidents. I thought democrats blamed to innocent. Are we lowering ourselves to lefturd standards? Blacks do most of the crack cocaine dealing. So when someone dies from an overdose if we didn't have blacks here odds are that person would still be alive. So in conclusion. Okay by me.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 19, 2007 03:38 PM (cuZRd)
7
Bigots, Racists, Nazis, KKKrs, Stormtroopers. That's what you is.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 19, 2007 03:52 PM (cuZRd)
8
A beautiful young woman gone -- and this rotten drunk driver still here. Very sad.
God bless the family, my prayers and thoughts are with you.
Posted by: Richard Romano at June 19, 2007 04:10 PM (iD1fP)
9
Yes, Blacks sell a lot of crack, but not so much anymore as they have lots of competition from south of the border types, both legal and illegal. The blacks have always bought their base cocaine from south of the border, they are only on the tail end of the pipe, so to speak, the ones who make the least and take the most risk.
But this has nothing to do with illegals driving cars in the U.S. or killing someone with a car.
Especially one that has a previous criminal record and should have been put in prison, either here or in Mexico.
Mexico has a terrible prison system but it does have some advantages. In most, relatives can bring food and such for them, visit them often and give them "other treats". But they don't have to stay very long because they are overcrowded and don't intend on building a new prision every year like we do. Actually I think it has risen to more than one a year.
The criminal gangs run Mexico.
End of story.
Papa Ray
West Texas
USA
Posted by: Papa Ray at June 19, 2007 09:24 PM (gQ03B)
Seriously! I dispute that you can take the defense of our National border to far with articles like this! maybe if we nuke Mexico for invading us, that might be going "to far". As it sits, if the invaders were just a bit more overt in thier reconquest of the southwest, we would probably have wised up sooner. Either way, it IS an invasion, and it needs handled. I'm prety much not going to quibble over bringing drunk illegals into the spotlight if it helps even a little.
USA, all the way! All the way!!!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 20, 2007 11:23 AM (2OHpj)
Numbers USA Identifies Immigration "Champions"
I want to express my sincere thanks to all these men and women who have been identified as "Champions" by Numbers USA:
If either of your senators is not on the list above, he or she should be hearing from you, because he or she is in danger of rolling over on this bill.
Remember, folks: A vote FOR CLOTURE is a vote to MOVE THE BILL FORWARD. Don't let them try to tell you that a vote for cloture isn't a vote for the bill. It absolutely is.
Any senator voting for cloture on this bill doesn't deserve to be returned to office. It is that simple, and they need to hear that message.
Those toll-free Amnesty Hotline numbers to your senators, btw, are :
1-800-882-2005. (Spanish number)
1-800-417-7666. (English number)
Call them. Call them often. Let them know, in no uncertain terms, that a vote for cloture is political suicide.
