June 19, 2007

Porkmeister Lott, Crybaby Graham Decline Hugh Hewitt's Debate Challenge

We all know Graham and Lott are afraid of Hewitt.

This is with good reason. Graham and Lott have an untenable position and they're mental midgets. They don't want to debate the merits of the bill, so they respond to their critics by throwing out baseless slanders.

They know their slanders won't stick to Hewitt, so they run away:

My producer left invitations with both Senators Lott and Graham to appear today, and neither accepted. We'll try again tomorrow.

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:46 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.

"Immigration is the one issue where regular rules don’t apply."

Via the New York Times:

“It’s a matter of what happens behind closed doors in the next couple of weeks,” said Angelo Amador, director of immigration policy for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “Immigration is the one issue where regular rules don’t apply.”
Yeah, no shit.

Posted by: Ragnar at 01:48 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.

June 17, 2007

Professor Reynolds on the Impending GOP Suicide

Posted at Instapundit:

Do [the Republicans] want whining from Michael Chertoff and Trent Lott to form the public image of the Bush Administration and the Republican Party?

Apparently they do. Good luck with that, guys. The political press can run with stories about bloggers being in full revolt over immigration, but it's not really a case of bloggers vs. the Administration. Rather, it's a case -- like Harriet Miers, Dubai Ports, PorkBusters, etc. -- of the Bush Administration ignoring the clear warnings available in the blogosphere. And once again, it's not just bloggers who think the Administration is crazy. So far, every time they've done that they've had their head handed to them. That'll happen this time, too, and if they should happen to "win" and pass their bill, the consequences for the GOP will be even worse. "Bizarre Republican Death Wish?" Indeed.

Frankly, that's okay with me. I've long been unhappy with both Democrats and Republicans. The GOP has been better on national security, though that advantage is fading with time, but overall both parties have been lame and more likely to unite in opposition to citizens' rights and liberties than to compete in protecting them. I've often at least sort-of hoped for a third party that would combine the GOP economic-libertarian strands with the Dems' social-libertarian strands. I don't know if the GOP's self-destruction makes that more likely, but it seems like it might. At any rate, if people really want to commit suicide it's hard to stop them, and that seems to be the GOP's main goal at the moment.

I don't agree with Prof. Reynolds on the second paragraph. The GOP is a mess, but the GOP rank-and-file are mostly solid, live-and-let-live kinda folks. The GOP is still the home of the traditional fiscal-social conservative alliance, and it's not clear we can form much of a coalition with any of the interest groups that make up the core of the Dem party. I continue to believe that the "Bizarre Republican Death Wish" results from the insane actions of a cabal of out-of-touch party leaders, and not from the actions of the party as a whole.

We've long known that the GOP is "The Stupid Party," but it's stupid primarlly because of weak leadership. I'm mad as hell at the GOP right now, and I may or may not be casting many votes for Republicans next year, but I'm also cognizant of the the fact that a mass exodus from the GOP would require a new party apparatus to be built from the ground up, and that would take years. In the meantime, this country's leftists would essentially have a free hand to gut our military, sell out our sovereignty and take over the economy without anything resembling an organized opposition in place to stop them. Experience has taught us that this type of damage is remarkably difficult to undo.

At this point in the game, I'm still willing to stand with the solid conservatives, mercilessly punish the RINOs, and fight like hell for good people in the primaries.

On the other hand, I won't be voting for any more RINOs, and I'm finished giving any cash to the RNC and its various slush funds. I might give 'em some spare change once in a while, just so they know I remember 'em.

Posted by: Ragnar at 04:59 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 559 words, total size 3 kb.

June 16, 2007

"The Community Can Not Stand to Lose Another Emergency Room"

Here's a news story about a woman who bled to death waiting for care in an overloaded emergency room in Los Angeles. The story also mentions a man who died in an emergency room after waiting four days for care.

How could this happen? Why would an emergency room in Los Angeles, California be overloaded? Hmmm...

Posted by: Ragnar at 01:29 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.

Hewitt Offers to Make Trent Lott his B!+ch

Trent Lott recently had this to say about "talk radio people":

"I'm sure senators on both sides of the aisle are being pounded by these talk-radio people who don't even know what's in the bill," Lott said. He added that the "leadership will have to be prepared to do what needs to be done."
To which Hugh Hewitt responded:
I will invite Senator Lott on the program next week to discuss what is in the bill and the amendment package. I suspect he will decline, but you never know.
I'm sure we all realize Trent Lott probably doesn't have the cojones to square off against Hewitt. Hell, I'll bet he wouldn't have the cojones to square off against me, and I'm just a part-time amateur! I'll just about guarantee you Lott doesn't know what's in this bill. If I found out he does know, and is still supporting it, my opinion of him will be even lower than it already is.

Then again, if Lott or any of his cronies are in the mood to mix it up, come on down. I suspect he won't, and none of his cronies will, either. I wouldn't be surprised to find out the whole lot of them are deficient in the testicular fortitude department, and we've all known for some time that Lott doesn't have much going on upstairs. That's only become all the more painfully obvious as this debacle has unfolded. Lott's a bloviating old moron and an embarassment to the GOP. Anyone working for him should be ashamed of themselves. Lott's long since passed his "sell-by" date and needs to be put out to pasture. Unfortunately, he's not up in 2008. Ah, well. Mark the calendar...

Posted by: Ragnar at 09:53 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 289 words, total size 2 kb.

Why the Railroad Effort on the Amnesty Bill?

We can all understand the push by big business to keep their steady flow of illegal laborers coming in, strengthening their bargaining position against blue-collar working class Americans. Then again, they already have that today in droves. Why the sudden balls-to-the-wall push to get it all "kosher" right now? Mickey Kaus forwards a theory:

Chertoff and Kyl both seem to have answered that question recently, Kyl in his Wall Street Journal interview and Chertoff on Fox News yesterday: because businesses are starting to worry about efforts to enforce immigration laws at the local level. One state in the vanguard of that effort is Kyl's (and McCain's) home state of Arizona, where the legislature has passed numerous laws (usually vetoed) on the issue, and where the public voted for Prop 200 back in 2004.

To me that says something far more ominous than that Congress is being disingenuous or naïve on the matter. Far from simple being empty promises, this amnesty bill is actually a blatant attempt to head off any attempts at enforcement at all.

I think this is probably right. I think big business realizes that voters are going to extract some very explicit and unequivocal promises from their candidates next year. I think they realize at this point that a number of their champions on this bill are not coming back to Washington after the next election.

Big agriculture and big construction realize that they'll be faced with a new Commander-in-Chief, Democrat or Republican, who will likely have made a list of unequivocal promises to the voters during the campaign. Given the opportunity to build up public goodwill with a series of big, high-profile immigration busts in her first six months of office, does anyone think that President Hillary would pass it up? If she's anywhere near as calculating as her reputation suggests, there's not a chance she'll pass up that opportunity. A Republican President would feel less need for high-profile token efforts, but may bring in a Justice Department that actually cares about national security. (How crazy would that be?) If you're an employer who's been skirting the law for years with a wink and a nod, this change in the winds has to be keeping you up at night--with good reason. Some CEOs looking at public opinion polls and knowing their employment rolls haven't been even close to right with God, have to be dealing with some serious heartburn at the thought of angry villagers at the corporate gates demanding massive fines and/or a few years in federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.

If the employers can just get across the line on this, they've significantly reduced their exposure. This Amnesty Bill represents a sort of "get out of jail free" card for these executives. Whether it'll actually work out that way is another matter. They see the writing on the wall, and they're pulling out the stops to protect their own hides, even if they have to wreck their own country to do it.

Of course, jamming this piece of shit down our throats only adds to the long list of reasons we're already pissed as hell at the employers and their elected cronies.

This may be your time, fellas. You may have the upper hand now. The men in power are your boys, and you may get them to vote how you like, even against the clear will of the people who sent them there.

Enjoy it while it lasts, but don't forget it for a second: our time is coming. You have the cash, but we have the numbers. A whole lot of us have damn long memories. We're gonna remember every bit of this sordid ordeal.

And payback, as they say, is a bitch.

Posted by: Ragnar at 09:05 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 625 words, total size 4 kb.

Senate: Now There Were Only One or Two Things....

.....the stupid voters and bloggers could have done when they found out the Senate voted for cloture. One, they could have given us a medal for being so brave and honest on the telephone, which wasn't very likely and we didn't expect it. Two, they could have bawled us out and told us to never to be caught voting on trash in the hallowed halls of the Senate ever again. But there was a third possibility we hadn't even considered, after we cast our vote, all of us up for re-election were immediately, rounded up, voted out of office and sent back home.

Hat Tip: larwyn. more...

Posted by: Howie at 06:12 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.

June 14, 2007

I Think This Picture Just About Sums it Up... (UPDATED)

outhouse.jpg

UPDATE by Rusty: John Hawkins has the inside scoop on the political wrangling over the immigration bill.

Posted by: Ragnar at 12:07 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.

Cornyn : "Working Diligently" to Pass Amnesty Bill

Via Sen. Cornyn's office:

I applaud the willingness of my colleagues to address this issue, and I regret that the Democrat Majority Leader chose to pull this legislation from the Senate floor. While I cannot support the bill as it was introduced, I was working diligently to strengthen it through the amendment process in several key areas. In the days ahead, I will continue to work on behalf of Texas employers, workers and families to pass legislation encompassing various components of this bill, including access to labor and enhanced border security...

Even though this bill has temporarily been pulled from consideration, both the Majority and Minority leadership in the Senate remain committed to passing comprehensive immigration reform this year. I will work with my colleagues to strengthen the guest worker program that gives priority to American workers first but also allows for the efficient and immediate employment of foreign nationals to fill those jobs which cannot be filled by the current labor market...

With commitment from both parties, I hope we are able to reach agreement on key amendments that will ensure that the failures of the 1986 bill are not repeated with this bill and create a workable solution which restores America’s confidence in our immigration system.

I don't know what your take on this is, but I'm pretty sure that's senator-ese for "Yeah, I heard your bitchin'. Bite me." Maybe I'm projecting.

By now, the Party knows where I stand on this. I imagine they know where you stand on this. They almost certainly know where 70%+ of the American people stand on this.

Apparently, it simply doesn't matter what you, I and 70% of the American people think anymore.

The ball is in their court right now, and the power is now in their hands--but power can be a fickle mistress. The power they have today, they got through deception about their own philosophies and principles. Now we're learning where these men and women really stand when the chips are down.

I don't know about you, but I have a long memory and a wide vindictive streak.

Full statement below the fold. more...

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:53 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 1382 words, total size 9 kb.

June 13, 2007

Robert Spencer on Immigration

A new episode of "Jihad Watch" at HotAir, this one on the national security disaster that is U.S. immigration (non)enforcement policy.

Posted by: Ragnar at 09:29 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.

June 12, 2007

An Open Letter to President Bush

Posted at DeMint.Senate.gov:

Dear Mr. President:

We respectfully ask that your Administration enforce the border security laws that have already been authorized by Congress regardless of whether the Senate passes the immigration reform bill. The bill assumes that several critical border security benchmarks can be achieved within 18 months. These security triggers are already authorized under current law and can be completed without the immigration bill. We believe these enforcement measures are vital and should not wait until Congress passes additional immigration reforms.

Securing the border is the best way to restore trust with the American people and facilitate future improvements of our immigration policy.

Sincerely,

U.S. Senators
Jim DeMint (R – South Carolina),
Tom Coburn (R – Oklahoma),
Mike Enzi (R – Wyoming),
David Vitter (R – Louisiana),
Jim Inhofe (R – Oklahoma),
Jim Bunning (R – Kentucky),
Charles Grassley (R – Iowa),
John Ensign (R – Nevada) and
Jeff Sessions (R – Alabama).

h/t : Allah

Posted by: Ragnar at 08:22 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.

Hutchison on Immigration Bill

Can anyone make sense of these statements?

Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison told “Morning Call” that she believes the bill on illegal immigration can be fixed.

A measure to legalize as many as 12 million illegal immigrants and tighten border security stalled last week in the Senate in the face of broad Republican opposition.

“We need immigration reform, we really do,” said Hutchison. “However, the bill that was on the Senate floor, which I think was pulled too quickly, is not the bill."

The bill can be fixed, and it was pulled too quickly--i.e., not given a full enough hearing, but it's not the right bill.

WTF???

Posted by: Ragnar at 04:58 PM | Comments (38) | Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.

GOP Holdouts Cutting a Deal with Bush?

Michelle reports that these ten GOP senators are close to cutting a deal with George Bush and Harry Reid on the Amnesty and Permanent Democrat Majority Bill of 2007:

* Alexander (R-TN)
* Cochran (R-MS)
* Coleman (R-MN)
* Collins (R-ME)
* Cornyn (R-TX)
* Craig (R-ID)
* Domenici (R-NM)
* McConnell (R-KY)
* Smith (R-OR)
* Warner (R-VA)
Each of these ten REPUBLICAN senators is up for reelection next year.

At last vote, the bill was 15 votes short of cloture. If even a majority of these guys hold rank, the bill can't move out of the Senate without their support. In other words, they don't have to do anything to prevent this bill from passing.

According to news reports, the deal is that they'll make a "Gang of 14"-style mutual pact against any filibuster if Reid will agree to allow them the privilege of discussing a few more amendments before the final vote

This is madness--but not the "This is SPARTA!!!" type of madness. This is more of the "please tie me up and anally rape me with a frozen burrito" type of madness. Hey, if that's what the senators like doing in their spare time, they can knock themselves out (literally), but when they insist on doing it to the ENTIRE DAMN COUNTRY, we have a serious fucking problem.

Was the much-lauded "defeat" of the bill just a ruse to get their phones to stop ringing for a couple days?

What part of "KISS YOUR RE-ELECTION GOODBYE" do these guys have trouble comprehending???

Posted by: Ragnar at 04:46 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.

June 11, 2007

Democratic Congressman Supporting Islamist Child Murderer

I'd love to say that the headline was misleading or an example of over-the-top yellow journalism, but it's not. Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) is sponsoring a bill that would give assylum to a convicted child killer who was part of a 1975 coup aimed at making Bangladesh an "Islamic Republic"--as Pakistan, which it broke from (remember, Bangladesh was then East Pakistan), would later become.

McDermott's private bill declares unequivocally that Mohuiddin A.K.M Ahmed is not guilty of the crime that he was convicted of, an assertion that the liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected.

Michelle has the details. I'd say something Sullivenesque like "I'm disgusted" or "heartache", but I'm just passed feeling anything anymore when it comes to the immigration issue.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:50 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.

June 10, 2007

More Geraldo on Immigration

Geraldo sets the record straight on amnesty...or not.

It's abundantly clear that Geraldo, like George W. Bush, is able to think about an inch deep on this issue, if that. Neither Geraldo or Bush can contend with the facts and the nightmare provisions of this bill. The answer is all super-simple in their minds. The facts are unimportant. It's 100% emotion. I'll wager Geraldo doesn't have the slightest idea as to the substance of what's in the bill. To him, it doesn't matter. To Geraldo, if it will give one person a chance to emerge from the shadows, that is enough. If a child thought that way, we'd forgive her. Geraldo Rivera and George Bush have no excuse.

Posted by: Ragnar at 05:10 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.

Mexico Complains to Bush Administration Over Flow of Illegals...

...into Mexico.

In this case, the "illegals" are weapons.

Hey, Patricio--it's called "quid pro quo."

That there's some Latin right there, fella. Maybe you should go look that up.

See also: "what goes around comes around," Maxwell's demon, Schrodinger's Mexican.

h/t : Glenn

Posted by: Ragnar at 03:10 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.

June 07, 2007

Dorgan on the Amnesty Bill

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:40 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 5 words, total size 1 kb.

Shamnesty Bill PWNED

killinurbill.jpg
Graphic courtesy of Slublog at Ace's.

Congress's shameful attempt to ram down our throats an unpopular bill legalizing tens of millions of borderjumpers and adding them to the welfare rolls and public dole, has been defeated.

Niiiiiice. Reid threatened to bring it back in a few weeks.

Bring it on. NO AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS.

PS - Is Lindsay Graham crying here? Maybe Michelle had it right.

APTOPIX_Congress_Immigration.sff_DCSW106_20070607150903.jpg
Cry us a freikin' Rio Grande.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 08:32 PM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.

Ouch, Baby.... VERY Ouch...

Via The Politico:

Subject: RE: TIME TO CALL RADIO
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:15:22 -0400
From: David Nix
To: ‘Adam Temple’
CC: Mike Gibbons

Adam,

Please consider this my resignation as Aiken County chair for McCain. I am too far from him on the Amnesty Bill. I was hopeful that he could keep his nose clean this time around, but he can’t read the pulse of the American citizens.

Please pass my regrets on to Henry McMaster.

David Nix
Aiken County

h/t : Allah.

Posted by: Ragnar at 03:12 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.

Michelle: Tracking Amnesty with a Laser Beam

UPDATE ; I see that Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) also voted against the Coburn Amendment.

Thank God for Michelle. She's all over the amnesty bill:

Sen. Dodd is babbling about an amendment to allow naturalized citizens to bring over parents, arguing that Congress shouldn't have any role in "dictating the terms" of family reunification...

GOP Sens voting NAY on the Coburn amendment - that is, voting against full enforcement of existing immigration laws: LUGAR, KYL, CRAIG, VOINOVICH, COLLINS, MURKOWSKI, BROWNBACK, HAGEL, STEVENS, DOMENICI, WARNER, SPECTER

Like I said before, folks, all of these folks need to hear from you, but Brownback in particular needs to hear from you.

Posted by: Ragnar at 12:47 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.

Price Tag for the Amnesty Bill : $2.6 Trillion

Yup, that's "trillion"--with a "T.":

he increase in taxes and fines paid by amnesty recipients may initially exceed slightly the increase in government benefits received. In the long run, however, the opposite will be true. In particular, the cost of retirement benefits for amnesty recipients is likely to be very large. Overall, the net cost to taxpayers of retirement benefits for amnesty recipients is likely to be at least $2.6 trillion.h/t : Rob Bluey

Posted by: Ragnar at 09:57 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.

Amnesty Bill on the Brink?

From the very smart (and very connected) Rob Bluey:

Well-placed sources tell me that activists are focusing their attention on the following list of senators: Sam Brownback (R.-Kan.), Richard Burr (R.-N.C.), Saxby Chambliss (R.-Ga.), Larry Craig (R.-Idaho), Pete Domenici (R.-N.M.), Byron Dorgan (D.-N.D.), John Ensign (R.-Nev.), Mike Enzi (R.-Wyo.), Judd Gregg (R.-N.H.), Johnny Isakson (R.-Ga.), Jon Kyl (R.-Ariz.), Mary Landrieu (D.-La.), Trent Lott (R.-Miss.), Mitch McConnell (R.-Ky.), Claire McCaskill (D.-Mo.), Ben Nelson (D.-Neb.), Mark Pryor (D.-Ark.), Debbie Stabenow (D.-Mich.), John Sununu (R.-N.H.), Jon Tester (D.-Mont.), George Voinovich (R.-Ohio), Jim Webb (D.-Va.), and John Warner (R.-Va.).
Well, there you have it, folks. It could go either way. It will come down to one or two votes. If you're represented by one of these guys and you haven't called him yet, this would probably be a good time.

And if you have already called him, now, would probably be a good time to call him again.

Those toll-free Amnesty Hotline numbers to your senators, btw, are :

1-800-882-2005. (Spanish number)

1-800-417-7666. (English number)

Call them. Call them often. Let them know, in no uncertain terms, that a vote for cloture is political suicide.

As you probably know, Kansas Senator Sam Brownback has his eye on the White House. Wherever you live, you might want to consider calling Sam Brownback's office and letting him know there's really no reason his political future needs to go down the tubes over John McCain's personal political death wish. You can reach Sam Brownback here.

Posted by: Ragnar at 09:51 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 250 words, total size 2 kb.

Pollster Frank Luntz on What Happened in the John McCain Focus Group

I've done this now since 1992, and I've gone up to New Hampshire, and I'm proud to say I haven't gotten it wrong.

I've never seen any group turn on somebody like they turned on Senator McCain, and that's because this issue of immigration is so powerful, so destructive, so divisive, and John McCain's on the wrong side of that issue....

...they're not listening. And for me, it's not just a general negative. When I hear people who define themselves as 'Christian conservatives' using four-letter words to describe the bill, I know that there's intensity.

Video at HotAir.

Posted by: Ragnar at 02:26 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.

June 06, 2007

President Bush Tries His Hand at English

On May 29, in Glynco, Georgia, George W. Bush made the following statement, hammering hard against the opponents of his immigration bill, most of whom are on the Republican side of the aisle:

"If you want to kill the bill, if you don't want to do what's right for America, you can pick one little aspect out of it, you can use it to frighten people. Or you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all."
These words and sentences are not complicated. The inferences are pretty clear. Let's break it down:
...if you don't want to do what's right for America...
The logic: The President's way is what's right for America. If you Republicans and Democrats do not agree with the President's way, you are personally against what's right for America.

The inference: No matter who you are, Republican or Democrat, if you are against the President's way, you are against the best interests of this country (or maybe this continent). (MORE BELOW THE FOLD) more...

Posted by: Ragnar at 10:31 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 537 words, total size 4 kb.

My Call to Senator Cornyn's Office

I called Senator Cornyn's office today. I was able to get through using the pro-amnesty hotline. In any event, I asked for the Senator's position on the bill now that his amendment failed and Ted Kennedy's amendment passed by a huge margin.

The very nice young lady who answered the phone provided me with the following information:

STAFFER : "Senator Cornyn does not support amnesty."

ME : "President Bush, Senator Kennedy, Senator Specter, Senator McCain and Senator Kyl also oppose 'amnesty.' Can I conclude from this that Senator Cornyn is in agreement with these individuals as to amnesty?"

STAFFER : "No. Senator Cornyn is definitely not in agreement with those Senators."

ME : "How is his position different?"

STAFFER : "Well, Senator Cornyn does not support any bill that repeats the mistakes of the 1986 bill."

ME : "Well, OK, then. What were the mistakes of the 1986 bill?"

STAFFER : "The 1986 bill was amnesty."

ME : "OK... that's a just little bit circular. How is this bill different from the 1986 bill?"

STAFFER : "Can I transfer you to someone in our office more familiar with this bill?"

ME : "Yes, thank you. That would be wonderful."

STAFFER: "Hold please."

The next thing I heard on the line--and I shit thee not--was a recorded voice with the following message:
"ADIOS."
Has anyone else had this experience? Was this something from the Senate switchboard? A message from the pro-amnesty hotline? Wierd.

Posted by: Ragnar at 01:43 PM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 244 words, total size 2 kb.

<< Page 3 >>
187kb generated in CPU 0.2739, elapsed 0.2893 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.2363 seconds, 406 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.