Yup. Doing all this while calling the military incompetent, mind you. They care for me as much as they care for the military. I don't want any member of the Democrat party in Washington touching me or my life in any way, ever.

Reid is fully aware, according to Democratic leadership aides, of the disappointment among Democratic operatives over their unsuccessful attempt to set withdrawal dates for Iraq, and he knows that Democrats have not been able to show a dramatic string of legislative victories that impact Americans on a daily basis.

Other than a minimum-wage increase and a stem cell research bill, which Bush is expected to veto, Democrats have "not been able to push through anything that touches all Americans on a daily basis," noted one Democratic strategist

In case we haven't been paying attention, failed public education, endless litigation, regulation, oppressed economies, high crime urban areas, balkanization of ethnic/racial/religious groups, enthusiastic support for abortions, spitting on our military, supporting illegal immigration, breaking families and communities through welfare dependence, blaming the people and not their own private jets for "global warming,' and the constant insertion of themselves into virtually every part of your wallet and your life has been Democrat Party policy since the 1960's. Catastrophic failures across the board, and they're lecturing us about the need for them to "touch my life every day."

DEMOCRAT FRAUDS - leave me alone, get your grubby hands out of my wallet, trashcans, kitchens, light sockets, businesses, cars, child rearing, education, etc.

We don't need you. We don't want you. Drop dead.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 08:35 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 266 words, total size 2 kb.

27%.

Man - that's a mandate for change.

Third party time?

Posted by: Good Lt. at 10:34 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.

You remember this scumbag. Pelosi, after realizing that he was a corrupt ass*ole who even the Democrats couldn't stomach and voted to impeach for bribery, was forced to remove him from a list of potential committee chairs in anticipation of the 2006 electoral victories.

WELL - the last federal judge to be impeached - by his own party, no less - has been appointed as a co-chair of Hillary's presidential campaign.

Ride that fat, corrupt hog all the way to the White House, Hildabeast!

More at Captain's Quarters.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 09:22 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.

A fair question, given the feeding frenzies of the Democrats, media and nutroots over Duke Cunningham, Bob Ney and Tom DeLay. In addition, the media silence on DiFi's " appearances of impropriety" and on Sandy Berger's refusal to testify under oath about what documents he destroyed, why and for whom (and his non-punishment) are just trees falling in the forest with nobody hearing them.

Apparently, "it takes a woman" from San Francisco to brush the filth in the House under the rug, and the "most ethical, most open, most transparent government in history" was nothing more than a bumper sticker used by Democrats.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 08:38 AM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.

UPDATE: The shoe drops. Cue Democrat propaganda machine overdrive.

Not a good day in Nutroot land. Via Drudge:

Sources tell CBS NEWS that Congressman William Jefferson (D-LA) will be indicted this afternoon on more than a dozen counts involving public corruption. Jefferson has been the subject of a ongoing probe in which FBI agents allegedly found more than 90-thousand dollars in cash in his freezer. The Justice Department is expected to unveil the charges later today... Developing...

Make sure to read leftwing blogs for their reactions. You'll get a lot of "big deal," or "the Rethuglikkkans did it first!" or "Bush doesn't like Black People."

Posted by: Good Lt. at 11:53 AM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I think you're wrong about the Dems reaction.  Most of the posts I've browsed in the past 30 minutes fall into the "throw the bum out" variety.
 
 

Posted by: Bo at June 04, 2007 01:20 PM (Ywo+X)

2 Good to hear. Let us know when they start saying the same about Murtha, Pelosy and Reid...

Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at June 04, 2007 01:43 PM (gtZwa)

3 Bummer!  William "Dollar Bill" Jefferson is one of my favorite scumbag politicians. 

Posted by: Dadzilla at June 04, 2007 02:02 PM (GDtFO)

4 I hope they aren't as tough on him as they were on Sandy Berger.

Posted by: Buckley F. Williams at June 04, 2007 02:04 PM (/XWKc)

5 I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop on the other Willian Jefferson "Clinton"...
 
 
http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/?p=88#more-88
 
 
 
 
 
 

This is a more detailed version of a column that was published in The New York Post on May 24, 2007.

Since he left office in 2001, former president Bill Clinton has been paid by InfoUSA, an Omaha, Nebraska company that has been identified as a key provider of specially designed databases that are sold to criminals who use the detailed information to defraud the unsuspecting elderly.

Because Senate financial disclosure rules do not require Hillary Clinton to reveal exactly how much — or for what — the company has paid her husband over the past five years, we don’t know all the details. But we do know this: former presidents – especially Bill Clinton – don’t come cheap. And, just months after he left the presidency, Bill Clinton was paid $200,000 for a speech given to InfoUSA in Omaha. Since then, he has been paid an undisclosed amount each year, listed only as “more than $1000” for ‘non-employee compensation” on Senator Clinton’s Senate financial disclosure form.

According to the The New York Times, InfoUSA compiled and sold lists that disclosed the names of elderly men and women who would be likely to respond to unscrupulous scams. The lists left no doubt about the vulnerability of the elderly targets. The Times reported, for example, that InfoUSA advertised lists of “Elderly Opportunity Seekers,” 3.3 million older people “looking for ways to make money,” and “Suffering Seniors,” 4.7 million people with cancer or Alzheimer’s disease. “Oldies but Goodies” contained 500,000 gamblers over 55 years old, for 8.5 cents apiece. One list said: “These people are gullible. They want to believe that their luck can change.”

InfoUSA sold lists to companies that were under investigation or closed down by courts because of their criminal activity. The company’s internal emails show that employees were aware that the investigation for elderly fraud involved their customers, but sold the lists anyway.

The Times profiled one unfortunate 92 year old man who entered a sweepstake sponsored by InfoUSA. The information that he innocently provided was then sold to the predator marketers. After responding to their telemarketing calls seeking financial information, his entire life savings was stolen from his bank account at Wachovia Bank. These practices, using lists supplied by InfoUSA were repeated all over the country.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

Posted by: doriangrey at June 04, 2007 02:49 PM (XvkRd)

6 Dorian:
I believe the above is unfairly being used to smear Clinton, I am a consultant and I do not profile the companies that I work for, or even involve myself in their business beyond the scope of the job I am doing for them.
As none of this information seemed to come out, or was well known before it was linked to Clinton, I think it's poor taste to tar him with it. It wasn't like he was profiling the elderly, or cold calling pensioners for them, and it can be reasonably assumed that if it was public knowledge he would have refused the work.

Posted by: davec at June 04, 2007 04:10 PM (kcDpP)

7 davec,
 

Bill "define the meaning of is" Clinton you really need to put the crack pipe down and back slowly away from it. Whitewater, Travelgate, Lincoln Savings and Loan, Chinagate, Donorgate, Bloodgate,  Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Eileen Wellstone, Carolyn Moffet, Elizabeth Ward, Paula Corbin, Sandra Allen James, Christy Zercher,

 

 

http://members.aol.com/patriot888/clincrim.txt

 

 

THE MOST ETHICAL ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORYSummary of Alleged Crimes and Abuses of Power by the Clinton Administration  Updated Oct. 27, 1997  --  For  reasons  of  brevity,  titles  ofindividuals  are  omitted  and  allegations are listed in summarystyle only. Each allegation has been described in detail  in  theWashington Weekly over the past few years.  BILL CLINTON  (1) Conspired with David Hale and Jim McDougal to defraud the  Small Business Administration of $300,000.   (2) Used State Police for personal purposes.   (3) Abused his position as governor to extort  sexual  favors  from employees.   (4) Directed State Police to fabricate incriminating evidence  against  political  opponents:  Steve  Clark, Terry Reed, and  Larry Nichols.   (5) Knew about drug importation and distribution by a  friend  and campaign contributor, Dan Lasater.   (6) Allowed drug money to be laundered through ADFA.   (7) Appointed and protected Arkansas Medical  Examiner  Fahmy  Malak    who   repeatedly  obstructed  justice  by  declaring  murders as "suicides" or "accidents."   ( Has never accounted for his actions during 40 days behind  the Iron Curtain during the Vietnam War.   (9) Tipped  off  Governor  Tucker  about  upcoming   criminal  referral.   (10) Violated  Arkansas  campaign  finance  laws.   (11) Violated the Constitution by signing into law an ex post  facto law, a retroactive tax increase.   (12) Fired RTC chief Albert Casey to allow his  friend  Roger  Altman  to monitor  and  block  Whitewater  investigations.   (13) Fired FBI director William Sessions and the  entire  top  management  at  the  FBI  to  prevent  an autonomous FBI from  investigating the suicide of Vince Foster and other scandals.   (14) Fired all U.S. Attorneys  to  appoint  Paula  Casey  who  prevented Judge David Hale from testifying against Clinton.   (15) Offered State Troopers federal jobs in return for  their  silence about Clinton's crimes.   (16)  Blocked   Justice    Department    indictments    after  Inspector General Sherman Funk found "criminal violations  of  the  Privacy Act  provable   beyond  reasonable  doubt"  when  former Bush employee files were searched and  leaked  to  the  press.   (17) Appointed friend and felon Webster Hubbell to  number  3  position  in  Justice Department in order to be able to block  Whitewater criminal referrals by  RTC  investigator  L.  Jean  Lewis.   (1   Blocked the criminal trial of  Representative  Ford,  a  Tennessee Democrat.   (19) Appointed a campaign activist to  head   the   Commodity  Futures   Trading  Commission,  without  the mandated "advice  and consent" of the Senate, to derail a  probe  of  his   and  Hillary's  financial  dealings.   (20) Committed witness tampering by causing bribes to be paid  to Webster Hubbell.   (21) Committed witness tampering by causing a  job  with  the  NSC  to be offered to former Trooper L.D. Brown in return for  Brown's silence on several Clinton crimes.   (22) Rifled through L.D. Brown's personnel file at the CIA in  an  attempt  to find damaging information on Brown, a witness  to many Clinton crimes.   (23) Blocked Justice Department prosecution of Arthur Coia, a  union Mob puppet and heavy Clinton donor.   (24) Made fund-raising calls from the White House, a  federal  property.   (25) Accepted a bribe from the Government  of  China,  hidden  from  federal election inspectors by laundering it through Ng  Lap Seng, the Bank of China, Charlie Trie and his  relatives,  and his Legal Defense Fund.   (26)  Accepted  a  $50,000  bribe  from  the  candidate   for  president of South Korea, in return for a written endorsement  of the candidate.   (27)  Engaged  in  a  criminal  scheme  to  launder   illegal  contributions  for the president of Teamsters campaign and in  turn laundered  illegal  foreign  contributions  through  the  "Teamsters for a Corruption Free Union" fund.    (2 Subverted federal campaign spending limits through a DNC  slush   fund  used  for  television  advertising  planned  by  political consultant Dick Morris.   Bill Clinton is under investigation by an Independent Counsel  and by Congress.           http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834  See a pattern here.............

Posted by: doriangrey at June 04, 2007 05:23 PM (XvkRd)

8 Summary of Alleged Crimes and Abuses of Power by the Clinton Administration

alleged:
adj 1: declared but not proved.

I'm not saying he's a good guy. I'm saying linking someone to the actions of a company they consulted for is completely unreasonable; consultants very rarely are exposed to the operating practices of the company they provide services for. As I said if the InfoUSA client list scandal was public knowledge beforehand it is unlikely they would have got involved, and that isn't a matter of their ethics just that they are so high profile that their involvement would be publicized like now.

Posted by: davec at June 04, 2007 05:41 PM (kcDpP)

9 You can do that to a black from the chooclate city. Bunch of bigots, racists, Nazi storm troopers. Now the friggin blacks in New Orleans will elect him the next major to get back at you white mutha fuckas. Don't believe it? Look up Marion Barry. Shit we is doomed. Are New Orleanians going to be ruled by bigoted blacks, black muslims or normal muslims? Which is worse? Keep buying that ammo. You're going to need it.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 04, 2007 06:28 PM (1h1Tb)

10 Nancy Pelosi's choice for homeland security commission. Willie Jefferson. Blacks in New Orleans re-elected the thief just to slap the face of honest Americans.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 04, 2007 06:49 PM (1h1Tb)

11 davec,
 
Pattern of behavior................................You do know what that means right........
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834
 

Posted by: doriangrey at June 04, 2007 08:03 PM (XvkRd)

12 I know exactly what it means, but no one is convicted for a "pattern of behavior"
If it's proven that he had knowledge that InfoUSA was involved in predatory practices in creating mailing lists of vulnerable people before he contracted with them, I'll happily retract it.

Posted by: davec at June 04, 2007 08:11 PM (kcDpP)

13 As to most of the above, I'd say Dick Morris knows his 'Clintons'.  He has worked with them before, and is entitled to his opinion. Besides, I'd rather see the left playing 'defense' for awhile.       
                                    USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 04, 2007 11:25 PM (2OHpj)

14 Can't understand why DAVEC is defending the indefensible. The Clintons are guilty of every crime a politician can comit and then some. Bill Clinton has the morals of a alley cat, the scruples of Willie Jefferson and the heart of John Wayne Gacy. I honestly believe Hillary is worse. You best believe Billy boy is porking some young thing tonight. And Hillary is watching.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 05, 2007 12:24 AM (1h1Tb)

15 Of course, Bush & Cheney have committed high crimes & misdemeanors but you retards don't want to hear that. Oh no, it's, "The democrats are bad because look at Jefferson!". *rolling eyes*

Did you watch the press conference of the US Attorney who is charging Jefferson? He looked nervous and he appeared to not be very comfortable about it. Hmmmmm.....an awful lot of time passed since the FBI raided Jefferson's office. Why so long? Who knows, but the cry baby republicans wanted at least ONE democrat to be charged with something because their party was so full of criminals that it just wasn't fair! LOL Wingnuts you all are...

Posted by: KayInMaine at June 05, 2007 07:25 AM (HIuT0)

16 Did someone just hear the logic pretzel  the Dem just said on Fox and Friends around the 17 min mark of the second hour?

He said regarding Cold Cash Jefferson, something like...

Well, back when Tom Delay was indited, the Republicans didn't remove him from anything, and that looked really bad for them... (implying that he was guilty)... BUT NOW, see, Jefferson is innocent until proven guilty, so he should NOT be removed from those committees, until he is found guilty.


WOW! I wish my TIVO didn't die, so I could really quote him well. It was just so typical of the "well, we know better, so we get the benefit of the doubt, and you guys are evil, so we want you all in jail anyway, guilty or not."

Posted by: JarvisW at June 05, 2007 07:32 AM (faim5)

17 That's a real asshole to defend willie jefferson. He's trash. always has been. Always will be. Also hangs with trash and trash elected him.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 05, 2007 03:30 PM (1h1Tb)

18 Kay in Maine is a 9-11 Twoofer nutbar. Ignore her.

Posted by: Good Lt at June 05, 2007 03:57 PM (yMbfY)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

The most open, most honest, most ethical Congress eternity will ever know is trying to ram through earmarks without scrutiny and without you knowing about it.

After promising unprecedented openness regarding Congress' pork barrel practices, House Democrats are moving in the opposite direction as they draw up spending bills for the upcoming budget year.

Democrats are sidestepping rules approved their first day in power in January to clearly identify "earmarks"—lawmakers' requests for specific projects and contracts for their states—in documents that accompany spending bills.

Rather than including specific pet projects, grants and contracts in legislation as it is being written, Democrats are following an order by the House Appropriations Committee chairman to keep the bills free of such earmarks until it is too late for critics to effectively challenge them.

Exactly.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 11:48 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.