June 04, 2007
Not a good day in Nutroot land. Via Drudge:
Sources tell CBS NEWS that Congressman William Jefferson (D-LA) will be indicted this afternoon on more than a dozen counts involving public corruption. Jefferson has been the subject of a ongoing probe in which FBI agents allegedly found more than 90-thousand dollars in cash in his freezer. The Justice Department is expected to unveil the charges later today... Developing...Will link relevant docs when they come out.
Make sure to read leftwing blogs for their reactions. You'll get a lot of "big deal," or "the Rethuglikkkans did it first!" or "Bush doesn't like Black People."
Posted by: Good Lt. at
11:53 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Bo at June 04, 2007 01:20 PM (Ywo+X)
Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at June 04, 2007 01:43 PM (gtZwa)
Posted by: Dadzilla at June 04, 2007 02:02 PM (GDtFO)
Posted by: Buckley F. Williams at June 04, 2007 02:04 PM (/XWKc)
http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/?p=88#more-88
This is a more detailed version of a column that was published in The New York Post on May 24, 2007.
Since he left office in 2001, former president Bill Clinton has been paid by InfoUSA, an Omaha, Nebraska company that has been identified as a key provider of specially designed databases that are sold to criminals who use the detailed information to defraud the unsuspecting elderly.
Because Senate financial disclosure rules do not require Hillary Clinton to reveal exactly how much — or for what — the company has paid her husband over the past five years, we don’t know all the details. But we do know this: former presidents – especially Bill Clinton – don’t come cheap. And, just months after he left the presidency, Bill Clinton was paid $200,000 for a speech given to InfoUSA in Omaha. Since then, he has been paid an undisclosed amount each year, listed only as “more than $1000†for ‘non-employee compensation†on Senator Clinton’s Senate financial disclosure form.
According to the The New York Times, InfoUSA compiled and sold lists that disclosed the names of elderly men and women who would be likely to respond to unscrupulous scams. The lists left no doubt about the vulnerability of the elderly targets. The Times reported, for example, that InfoUSA advertised lists of “Elderly Opportunity Seekers,†3.3 million older people “looking for ways to make money,†and “Suffering Seniors,†4.7 million people with cancer or Alzheimer’s disease. “Oldies but Goodies†contained 500,000 gamblers over 55 years old, for 8.5 cents apiece. One list said: “These people are gullible. They want to believe that their luck can change.â€
InfoUSA sold lists to companies that were under investigation or closed down by courts because of their criminal activity. The company’s internal emails show that employees were aware that the investigation for elderly fraud involved their customers, but sold the lists anyway.
The Times profiled one unfortunate 92 year old man who entered a sweepstake sponsored by InfoUSA. The information that he innocently provided was then sold to the predator marketers. After responding to their telemarketing calls seeking financial information, his entire life savings was stolen from his bank account at Wachovia Bank. These practices, using lists supplied by InfoUSA were repeated all over the country.
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834
Posted by: doriangrey at June 04, 2007 02:49 PM (XvkRd)
I believe the above is unfairly being used to smear Clinton, I am a consultant and I do not profile the companies that I work for, or even involve myself in their business beyond the scope of the job I am doing for them.
As none of this information seemed to come out, or was well known before it was linked to Clinton, I think it's poor taste to tar him with it. It wasn't like he was profiling the elderly, or cold calling pensioners for them, and it can be reasonably assumed that if it was public knowledge he would have refused the work.
Posted by: davec at June 04, 2007 04:10 PM (kcDpP)
Bill "define the meaning of is" Clinton you really need to put the crack pipe down and back slowly away from it. Whitewater, Travelgate, Lincoln Savings and Loan, Chinagate, Donorgate, Bloodgate, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Eileen Wellstone, Carolyn Moffet, Elizabeth Ward, Paula Corbin, Sandra Allen James, Christy Zercher,
http://members.aol.com/patriot888/clincrim.txt
THE MOST ETHICAL ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORYSummary of Alleged Crimes and Abuses of Power by the Clinton Administration Updated Oct. 27, 1997 -- For reasons of brevity, titles ofindividuals are omitted and allegations are listed in summarystyle only. Each allegation has been described in detail in theWashington Weekly over the past few years. BILL CLINTON (1) Conspired with David Hale and Jim McDougal to defraud the Small Business Administration of $300,000. (2) Used State Police for personal purposes. (3) Abused his position as governor to extort sexual favors from employees. (4) Directed State Police to fabricate incriminating evidence against political opponents: Steve Clark, Terry Reed, and Larry Nichols. (5) Knew about drug importation and distribution by a friend and campaign contributor, Dan Lasater. (6) Allowed drug money to be laundered through ADFA. (7) Appointed and protected Arkansas Medical Examiner Fahmy Malak who repeatedly obstructed justice by declaring murders as "suicides" or "accidents." (
Posted by: doriangrey at June 04, 2007 05:23 PM (XvkRd)
alleged:
adj 1: declared but not proved.
I'm not saying he's a good guy. I'm saying linking someone to the actions of a company they consulted for is completely unreasonable; consultants very rarely are exposed to the operating practices of the company they provide services for. As I said if the InfoUSA client list scandal was public knowledge beforehand it is unlikely they would have got involved, and that isn't a matter of their ethics just that they are so high profile that their involvement would be publicized like now.
Posted by: davec at June 04, 2007 05:41 PM (kcDpP)
Posted by: greyrooster at June 04, 2007 06:28 PM (1h1Tb)
Posted by: greyrooster at June 04, 2007 06:49 PM (1h1Tb)
Pattern of behavior................................You do know what that means right........
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834
Posted by: doriangrey at June 04, 2007 08:03 PM (XvkRd)
If it's proven that he had knowledge that InfoUSA was involved in predatory practices in creating mailing lists of vulnerable people before he contracted with them, I'll happily retract it.
Posted by: davec at June 04, 2007 08:11 PM (kcDpP)
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 04, 2007 11:25 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: greyrooster at June 05, 2007 12:24 AM (1h1Tb)
Did you watch the press conference of the US Attorney who is charging Jefferson? He looked nervous and he appeared to not be very comfortable about it. Hmmmmm.....an awful lot of time passed since the FBI raided Jefferson's office. Why so long? Who knows, but the cry baby republicans wanted at least ONE democrat to be charged with something because their party was so full of criminals that it just wasn't fair! LOL Wingnuts you all are...
Posted by: KayInMaine at June 05, 2007 07:25 AM (HIuT0)
He said regarding Cold Cash Jefferson, something like...
Well, back when Tom Delay was indited, the Republicans didn't remove him from anything, and that looked really bad for them... (implying that he was guilty)... BUT NOW, see, Jefferson is innocent until proven guilty, so he should NOT be removed from those committees, until he is found guilty.
WOW! I wish my TIVO didn't die, so I could really quote him well. It was just so typical of the "well, we know better, so we get the benefit of the doubt, and you guys are evil, so we want you all in jail anyway, guilty or not."
Posted by: JarvisW at June 05, 2007 07:32 AM (faim5)
Posted by: greyrooster at June 05, 2007 03:30 PM (1h1Tb)
Posted by: Good Lt at June 05, 2007 03:57 PM (yMbfY)
34 queries taking 0.1128 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









