Friendly Reminder about Democrat Hypocrisy On Iraq
Something to keep playing over and over in the background as you watch the all-night, meandering, pointless political kabuki theater mandated by the Democrat Party tonight. I'll be posting this until somebody in the mainstream press decides to (gasp) cull their video archives to do some side-by-sides for these selected "leaders."
Yes - that means I'll be posting it periodically forever.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
02:39 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 1 kb.
Hillary/Schumer want $1 Million For Hippie Museum
Yeah - that's really essential to the nation's survival.
How many Troops will have to go without supplies, armor or food because Hillary and Schumer want to fund a church to hippies?
The grassroots free-market group Americans for Prosperity (AFP) today released a list of Senate earmarks slated to be included in the Fiscal Year 2008 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education appropriations bill.
The 1,016 earmarks total nearly $392 million, and include millions for questionable projects such as $1 million in tax dollars for a museum dedicated to recreating the 1969 Woodstock Music Festival experience and $250,000 to help fund the Polynesian Voyaging Society, which makes and sails ancient canoes from Hawaii to Japan.
Maybe these two Democrat nudnicks could open their own vast coffers and cough up the dough themselves, rather than force the taxpayer to fund a shrine to the smelly, socialist, know-nothing generation.
With 'Moderate' Muslims Like This, Who Needs Terrorists?
Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress, has wedged his foot firmly in his mouth, and started to chew:
more...
Posted by: Bluto at
10:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.
Parents of Exonerated Haditha Marine Speak OutOn Pundit Review Radio. Listen to it all - Murtha (D) is looking worse with each passing development. Of course, we shouldn't have to keep digging this story out of the blogs - it should be blared from the mountaintops until this corrupt piece of crap is driven in disgrace from Congress forever.
Apparently, the Marines knew the accusing parties who got this travesty rolling were two sources who were little more than insurgents. Don't expect the mainstream press to be running around, proclaiming and supporting the moral authority of these two wonderful and infinitely patient military parents in the same wall-to-wall manner as they were parading the atrocious behavior of John Murtha (D) or the daily media-whoring of Cindy Sheehan (D/I).
That would put Murtha on the hot seat, and the mainstream press just can't have Democrats looking bad before 2008, can they? Lest Think Progress and the nutosphere call them "right-wing!" Oh, the horror!
Posted by: Good Lt. at
01:07 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
Webb vs. Graham Fireworks
You gotta laugh at Webb - I think the man has, in his recent years, let his temper get the best of him (could explain why he switched to the Donks).
The Democrat, a Vietnam veteran, lost an effort in the Senate last week to require specified periods of home time for troops deployed in the war, his bill winning majority support but falling short of the 60 votes needed to proceed. He took sharp objection when Graham asserted that high re-enlistment numbers are a vote of confidence in the Iraq policy by the troops.
"This is one thing I really take objection to — may I speak? — is politicians who try to put their political views into the mouths of soldiers," Webb said over his opponent's interruptions. He placed his hand briefly on Graham's back, then jerked his thumb in the Republican's direction.
"Have you been to Iraq?" Graham demanded.
"I've covered two wars as a correspondent," Webb said. "I have been to Afghanistan as a journalist."
Graham: "Have you been to Iraq and talked to the soldiers?"
Webb: "You know, you've never been to Iraq, Lindsey."
The Republican pointed out he's been there seven times.
DAMN THOSE FASCIST FACTS!
Posted by: Good Lt. at
05:28 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 2 kb.
Democrats Vote to Block Political Speech
Those Democrats - the freedom-loving, pro-media choice, pro-debate, First Amendment-supporting advocates of robust debate and free expression- moved to block free speech. Again.
Go DemCong!
Posted by: Good Lt. at
10:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
Richardson, a Hispanic and the governor of New Mexico, was a guest on Don Imus' syndicated radio program on March 29, 2006. Imus, who later lost his job over making racial comments, jokingly said one of his staffers suggested Richardson was "not really Hispanic."
Richardson replied in Spanish that if the staffer believes that, then he is a "maricon."
The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation says the word means "faggot" in Spanish.
In a statement this week, Richardson said that in the Spanish he grew up speaking, "the term means simply 'gay,' not positive or negative."
He told the AP on Thursday: "It was a playful exchange between me and Don Imus that was not intended to demean anybody, but if I offended anybody, I apologize."
Will the media firestorm of endless criticism and OUTRAGE!! ensue that surrounded George Allen in 2006? Don't hold your breath - that would mean giving the Democrats the same kind of treatment that Republicans routinely get. And the mainstream press, knowing its role within the Democrat/media complex, can't have that.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
12:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
Barbara Boxer is a Sub-Moronic Ass
"This is the closest we've ever been to a dictatorship?" Is she f*cking kidding me? Has this pampered little hussy ever lived in an actual dictatorship? And no, a meal served late at Le Bec Fin is not "oppression."
Did she recall her American history, where not more than several decades ago, a Democrat interred thousands of Japanese citizens in concentration camps for "the good of the nation" during wartime? Did she ever bother to pick up a book on Lincoln and read about how he threw politicians and journalists in prison for defying him? Has George Bush done either, or anything remotely close?
Why don't liberals know these inconvenient historical truths? Why don't they, in their infinite wisdom and intellectual honesty, step up to condemn the hysterical rantings of this yenta and put her in her proper place - washing dishes at Carabas?
How the haughty have fallen - this is the best and brightest (apparently) that the liberals have to offer. It is to laugh.
1
Good Lt. I've come to the conclusion that they do most of the time possess the knowledge. The problem is the lack of moral compass. Love your neighbour or a at least the golden rule are replaced with survival of the fittest... or should I say lyingest? hmmm I think I just made up a new word
Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at July 13, 2007 02:13 PM (gtZwa)
Democrats "Get Religion?"More wishful thinking from TIME. Rosie O'Donnell won't be happy to know that her chosen political party has reverted into "radical Christians" that are more dangerous than Al-Qaeda. Amanda Marcotte will likely be flinging sh*t all over the walls at Pandagon on this horrible news, right? Didn't she work for Edwards at some point in the recent....ah, nevermind.
Will this apparently "newfound faith" find its way into legislation under the DemCong? Is the Christian fascist state on the rise now? Will the secularists who usually reside at the faith community's throat be agitated to stop the march of religion in politics?
I question the timing (which makes me the ultimate patriot - thanks, Olbermann!). And the veracity of the reporting. And the whole notion that the Democrat Party is more "faith based" than the party which the DNC chairman regularly lambasts in tirades as being in control of what he sees as the nefarious and boorish "religious right."
Just the title of the article suggests that the Democrats have a problem with the religious vote. "Leveling the Praying Field" is intrinsically suggesting that the "praying field (sooo witty)" isn't level. Hence, a much needed biased fluff piece propping up lame Democrat candidates who really don't give a rat's butt about religion, insofar as they can fool you into thinking they do to get your vote.
They've discovered religion just in time for the opening of the 2008 election cycle! Do you believe in miracles, people?
PS - Edwards's hair looks great in that stained glass, doesn't it?
Posted by: Good Lt. at
10:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.
Weird: Clinton Called DC Madame?
OK - I don't know what to make of this, so treat it with a large grain of salt and a chortle.
I've been perusing the DC Madame phone records, and whilst looking through the Sept. 1994 bundle, I Googled (202) 789-1234, and got some site called "Background Check." I can't find any other pages, but it seems to list a background check of GW Bush, while including numbers, residents, neighbors, etc. for 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. The number right next to 202-789-1234? William J. Clinton. Now, the number is also the number for the Park Hyatt Hotel, so I don' t know if this is just some weird page, or a hit job on GWB that inadvertently listed something it may not have intended to, or whatever.
Here's the phone record for September 7, 1994:
And a screencap of the "Background Check" site:
So was the Clenis a patron of the DC Madame? Who knows - somebody from the Park Hyatt in DC could have just as reasonably made the call. I'm not sure what their number was in 1994, and I do know from reading Gary Aldrich's Unlimited Access that Clinton had a habit of being whisked out of the White House unannounced to WH security and unaccompanied by Secret Service to hotels and other spots around DC. So fweh, I dunno. Maybe this "Background Check" site is just a fabrication. If you wanna dig deeper, be my guest. I'm too tired, and my sides hurt from laughing.
Exit Q: Given what we know about the Reign and shape-shifting legacy of Clinton, is this scenario entirely beyond the realm of possibility?
UPDATE: A commenter at Riehl's site points out that these calls were made by the DC Madame's service to the listed numbers. David Corn, as he claims, is treating the numbers as if the clients are calling the DC Madame. I'm not sure how much it changes things - the sex service calling congressional offices and such. We'll probably have to wait for some more serious analysis of these records. Still, Congressional offices and (alleged) White House numbers popping up on an escort service's phone records is still indicative of a problem, no matter who's doing it.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
11:59 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 374 words, total size 3 kb.
DC Madame # Linked to Moynihan's (D) Office?
David Corn, looking to attach a Republican to the number, made a no doubt unpleasant discovery. Dan Riehl found out where it came from, and Ace is laughing himself silly:
So, David Corn thought he'd have some fun with "McCornthyism." (He was big on pimping "The List" of supposedly gay Republicans before last election day.)
Well, now buddy, we're gonna be looking to find out what Democrat was in Pat Moynihan's office the day after Christmas, 1998.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
10:42 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
RFK Jr: AnthroGW Skeptics Should Be "Treated As Traitors"And the Brownshirts of Environmentalism march on. Any shred of credibility one placed in RFK, Jr. has been nuked by this hyperpolitical zealotry:
However, Etheridge aside, it was nonmusicians at this concert who made the most passionate pleas about demanding action for the environment. "Get rid of all these rotten politicians that we have in Washington, who are nothing more than corporate toadies," said Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the environmentalist author, president of Waterkeeper Alliance and Robert F. Kennedy's son, who grew hoarse from shouting. "This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors."
That seems more like a threat than a plea.
So when liberal political advocates and lobbyists urge giving prison time and hanging to those with whom they have disagreements, they're "passionate." When hawks note that Democrats have been advocating the defeat of the US Military in Iraq to pick up Senate seats, the subversion of Bush's foreign policy with rouge diplomacy and leaks of classified information to the press, the overreach of Congress into the Constitutional territory of the Executive Branch in military matters, etc., they're called "extreme," "wingnuts," and "fascists."
Funny, that. Its OK, though. NBC assured us all that their fawning and slobbering coverage of Live Earth was in no way indicative of their approval of a "political" viewpoint. Algore, RFK Jr., myriads of foul-mouthed "artists," etc. are all politically "neutral."
Posted by: Good Lt. at
11:18 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
Dem. Advice: Don't Appeal To People's BrainsHilarious, especially since liberals hold themselves up as rational, intelligent, disinterested and emotionally level.
A brain researcher tells them not to attempt to appeal to people's rational, intellectual capacity. They're too smart for that. Everything we've ever said about Democrats appealing to the lowest common denominator while avoiding icky things like facts, details, rational thought, reason and intelligence have been confirmed. Hell, being hyperemotional has been their political leitmotif for decades.
He writes that when Sen. John F. Kerry of Massachusetts let a Swift-boat veterans group drag his reputation through the mud (2004), when Al Gore put a nation to sleep with his talk of lockboxes and Medicare actuaries (2000), and when Michael S. Dukakis said he didn't believe in the death penalty even in the event of his wife's rape and murder (1988), Democrats were exhibiting their single worst tendency: intellectual dispassion.
That style is ballot-box poison, said Westen. "The political brain is an emotional brain," he said. "It prefers conclusions that are emotionally satisfying rather than conclusions that match the data."
FACTS BE DAMNED -THE EGO MUST BE PLACATED!! Appeal to their feeeeeeeelings, Democrats. Less brainpower required, easier to bowl them over with your propaganda, failed utopian fantasies, political agendas, etc.
In other words, pretend everyone is a three-year old child and just run with it.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
01:37 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 224 words, total size 2 kb.
This is sure to make the Democrat Congress (16%) even more popular, and will also likely go miles to make the argument that they care about the little guy at the pump.
1
I predicted this months ago and Rush Limbaugh even used my qoute on his show an website. We are all going to be forced worship the Earth Mother Gaia.
Posted by: UncleZeb at July 08, 2007 02:46 PM (Sp21x)
It's so comforting to know that our elected officials rely on the, "Let's throw it against the wall and see if it sticks" philosophy. I'm hoping "it" hits a fan before it makes it to the wall.
Posted by: Barry at July 08, 2007 02:49 PM (Yb1KO)
3
<blockquote>We are all going to be forced worship the Earth Mother Gaia.</blockquote>
And this would be our (forced) "offering," I suppose.
What's ironic is how ferociously regressive gasoline tax is. Extra gas tax would take a higher percentage of income from people in lower income brackets. I thought the Ds were supposed to care about the poor!
Posted by: Insomniac at July 08, 2007 02:53 PM (vbE3R)
4
I hope the Democrats like being responsible for the prices of all goods and services increasing.
Those freight trucks and delivery systems don't fuel themselves, and the price gets passed on to the consumer.
On the other hand, this may be a boon to the GOP - a Democrat-mandated recession would do well to shock the nation out of its leftward slide.
Posted by: Good Lt at July 08, 2007 03:03 PM (yMbfY)
On the other hand, this may be a boon to the GOP - a Democrat-mandated recession would do well to shock the nation out of its leftward slide.
The MSM will blame it on Pres. Bush's "failed" environmental and energy policies.
Posted by: Insomniac at July 08, 2007 03:11 PM (vbE3R)
6
They can't blame an oppressive tax on Mr. Tax-cut, though.
They'll try, but its DemCongress's baby. Bring it on.
Posted by: Good Lt at July 08, 2007 03:19 PM (yMbfY)
7
Good Lt that figure of 14% is for Congress not the DemCongress. You are not being truthful.
According to the Gallup organization the public consistentky rates the Democrats higher than the Republicans by party in Congress.
http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=24649
This is also reflected in the strong party affiliation that the Democrats currently hold (and trending positively) 53% vs.37%.
Durrng the last 6 years the price of gas has doubled with much of it ending up in the pockets of our enemies. But having it go up another 15% (from $3.00 to $3.50) seems to throw many into a hissy fit.
The last poll numbers I could find on how Americans really feel about a gas tax increase (Feb 2006) indicate 85% would be against a gas tax increase BUT 55% said they would approve of the increase if it resulted in less dependence on foreign oil. My gut reaction is that this percentage would have increased during the last 18 months for the obvious reasons.
Posted by: John Ryan at July 08, 2007 03:39 PM (TcoRJ)
8
The gas tax poll is here.
http://www.physorg.com/news11278.html
Posted by: John Ryan at July 08, 2007 03:40 PM (TcoRJ)
9
Wrong. It's 14% according to Ruffini. Soon, it will be within the margin of error (4%), and then the very real possibility will exist that the approval rating is actually 0%. Right now it could theoretically be nudging up against single digits.
Worst. Congress. EVAR.
Posted by: Hucbald at July 08, 2007 03:44 PM (WH6o8)
10
Fifty cents isn't enough. Take it up a couple of dollars.
Sock those rednecks driving those macho trucks and fancy SUV gas guzzlers.
They bought the stupid vehicles. Now let them pay through the nose for them. Let them hurt where it wakes them up, in the pocketbook.
Those of us who walk, bike, ride scooters, take mass transport, carpool, drive gas efficient vehicles or electric vehicles aren't having to shell out what these bozos are. Keep it up, I love it.
Posted by: civil behavior at July 08, 2007 04:12 PM (mdnR3)
Must Listen: Levin Serves July 4 Clinton Souffle
To put the current Democrat Party into perspective and their manufactured outrage over Scooter Libby, you really NEED to listen to the first hour of Mark Levin's show tonight. I'm cerial.
1
Surprises me that lefturds would complain about Bush's soon to come pardon of Libby. Bill (BJ) Clinton was handing out pardons like candy at Halloween. Most for far worse crimes. Drug dealers, etc:
Posted by: greyrooster at July 04, 2007 09:52 AM (0j2/w)
2
The population of the United Staes has always been about equally divided between Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. Bush has continually pushed the Independents over to the Democrats, all he has reaining is his 33%. Libby's commutation will not help the Republicans win back any of these Independents.
Posted by: John Ryan at July 04, 2007 12:49 PM (TcoRJ)
"So how to dispose of the legal process that was commenced against Libby? The answer was simple: politicize it. Insist that every step taken against Libby was a part of a political vendetta. Granted this required some ingenuity—after all, the prosecutors and judges involved were Republicans or at least Bush appointees. But these are inconvenient truths, easily swept aside—and the arguments ricocheted through the pages of Neocon journals through yesterday, when the July the Fourth fireworks came out prematurely. Perhaps they were simply too absurd to be joined, but I salute Orin Kerr who yesterday offered some of the most penetrating analysis yet of the delusional criticism that comes from the Neocons:
The Scooter Libby case has triggered some very weird commentary around the blogosphere; perhaps the weirdest claim is that the case against Libby was “purely political.†I find this argument seriously bizarre. As I understand it, Bush political appointee James Comey named Bush political appointee and career prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to investigate the Plame leak. Bush political appointee and career prosecutor Fitzgerald filed an indictment and went to trial before Bush political appointee Reggie Walton. A jury convicted Libby, and Bush political appointee Walton sentenced him. At sentencing, Bush political appointee Judge Walton described the evidence against Libby as “overwhelming†and concluded that a 30-month sentence was appropriate. And yet the claim, as I understand it, is that the Libby prosecution was the work of political enemies who were just trying to hurt the Bush Administration.
I find this claim bizarre. I’m open to arguments that parts of the case against Libby were unfair. But for the case to have been purely political, doesn’t that require the involvement of someone who was not a Bush political appointee? Who are the political opponents who brought the case? Is the idea that Fitzgerald is secretly a Democratic party operative? That Judge Walton is a double agent? Or is the idea that Fitzgerald and Walton were hypnotized by “the Mainstream Media†like Raymond Shaw in the Manchurian Candidate? Seriously, I don’t get it. "
At this rate, your Congress will be at 0% by September.
Posted by: Good Lt at July 04, 2007 01:32 PM (yMbfY)
6James Comey named Bush political appointee and career prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald
Bo,
you are either a liar, or dumber than dirt. Fitzgerald is not a "Bush political appointee", numbnuts. And Coumey has never been a friend of the administration. Cuomey is a Liberal. His appointment to Deputy attorney general you can chalk up to Bush's misguided desire to reach across party lines.
Since the beginning Comey has been a thorn in the administration’s side on War on Terror
policies, favoring kinder treatment for illegal combatants than he had
for Martha Steward (Cuomey prosecuted her), and making waves over the NSA’s Counter-Terrorism
data-mining operation. Bush considers him a Liberal. Comey gleefully appointed his pal Patrick Fitzgerald, a kindred
spirit sharing every bit of Comey’s liberal politics and lack of prosecutorial inhibitions, as special prosecutor.
Posted by: Michael Weaver at July 04, 2007 02:36 PM (2OHpj)
8
And how quickly the liberals forget when BILL CLINTON granted clenemency to those porto rican terrorists
Posted by: sandpiper at July 04, 2007 03:09 PM (K3hNB)
9
Clinton issued 140 pardons. Clinton is a liar and so is his rotten wife.
BO: You're are a paid political hack. Nothing more. For a while I thought you had a brain and would look at both sides. You have failed in that. Anyone who can excuse Clinton has a blind eye for reality. Your endless blubbering. Is getting old. You know longer have anything of Interest to say. Just the same old bullshit. Anyone who sits and ignores Clinton's behavior is a one sided idiot. So time for you to fuck off.
Time for all to ignore Bo's one sided ranting. I for one will ignore his comments. Shame that a man turns himself into a whore. Only interested in getting paid.
Posted by: greyrooster at July 04, 2007 06:31 PM (Lg9t1)
I don't get paid one cent for my activism. I don't quite know how to prove that to you...I guess you'll just have to take my word on it.
I don't waste my time with Clinton. He is not in power. I will say this however: he was if nothing else a self made man. I respect any leader who can pull it all together without a slush fund.
I also by the same token respect Reagan. He knew America's limitations - never once directing enemy number one directly. He used soft power and the influence of his office to build alliances and defeat communism.
Bush, on the other hand, is a silver-spooned chickenhawk, faux Christian, who has weakened America, allowed the neocons to assume political power, and gotten us stuck in a quagmire from which we cannot easily remove ourselves.
Happy Independence Day!!
Posted by: Bo at July 04, 2007 09:02 PM (euN4c)
11Bush, on the other hand, is a silver-spooned chickenhawk, faux
Christian, who has weakened America, allowed the neocons to assume
political power, and gotten us stuck in a quagmire from which we cannot
easily remove ourselves.
We don't fight military battles on the standard of "can we immediately surrender if we get scared?" That's how liberals fight - not how Americans fight. Iraq is not a quagmire - it is a low-intensity conflict that has the
lowest casualty rate of any major US military operation in history. We're still in quagmires in South Korea and Germany, so by your logic, we should have abandoned the reconstruction and protection of those countries. It would've been 'easier' to do so.
Bush flew hundreds of hours in fighter jets in the TANG. Clinton smoked pot and dodged the draft in Europe. The "neocons" is code for the Jooos - stop being anti-Semitic. Yes - we will talk about Clinton, unless you agree never to talk about Bush after he leaves office. Which won't happen. As for Bush's religion, you have no evidence or standing to determine who is Christian and who isn't. Clinton, on the other hand, was a deviant, a pervert and a serial liar who had no religion.
See the difference? I know you don't.
Posted by: Good Lt at July 05, 2007 09:34 AM (yMbfY)
12
Clinton a self made man. He's never had a job in his life.
Posted by: greyrooster at July 06, 2007 07:07 PM (DYtTi)
Posted by: greyrooster at July 06, 2007 07:08 PM (DYtTi)
14
Bo: If you tell me you are not paid. I will believe it. Should have answered the question before and avoided the issue. This blog is composed of many closed minds. On both sides of the issue. Myself, I am anti-black because blacks in my community are anti-white. This makes me a racist, bigot, nazi, bla, bla, bla. I say blacks and muslims should be held accountable for what their people do. The politically correct and cowardly disagree. Many here say I have a closed mind on the subject. I say they do. I also say you have a closed mind. I also believe many who claim to be conservatives are in reality liberals by nature. Many (like Rusty) have the same old 60's mindset. This I do know. Neither side will ever come up with a solution to the muslim problem. Which is/was what this blog is about. You and John Ryan will never change your minds about anything. Neither will I. Now back to the real world.. Fuck you stupid lefturd prick.
Posted by: greyrooster at July 06, 2007 07:25 PM (DYtTi)
I blame talk radio, BOOSH, Republicans, neocons, Jooooos, the NWO, the Mossad, FAUX News,...ummm...the mainstream media for not praising them enough, ... uh... CHIMPEACH!11!
It has nothing to do with the Democrats being a group of hyperpartisan, incompetent, corrupt, pork-loving, Stalinist, First Amendment killing, Second Amendment hating, tax-hiking, socialist anti-military mongoloids.
3
Mongoloids should be pitied. Not put down by because of their misfortune. You are not only politically incorrect but obviously a heartless bigot toward the handicapped. Friggin Nazi.
Posted by: greyrooster at July 03, 2007 10:19 PM (visiI)
I blame the zombies. Everyone who has even remotely surfed the web knows that Democrats are actually zombies with protective, human-like artificial skin that hides their true appearance. They are controlled by their Hollywood masters who fund their political campaigns.
These are Gen-3 zombies with special chip implants that force them to start blaming the evil bushitlerhaliburtonrovecheney corp whenever anyone gets too close to the truth.
Honest. I read the instructions printed on the inside of my new box of tinfoil. Obviously it was for the congressional staffers and someone made a mistake and allowed these boxes to be accidentally sold to the sheeple.
Or maybe it's part of the Rovian conspiracy. I sometimes forget. Kos keeps telling me what to say, what to type. I try and block out the thoughts, but the tinfoil only does so much, and then I hear Barbara Steisand singing softly to me. There are also coded messages on the Kos comments. Read evey third letter of every third comment. You'll see...
heh... Leftists are such maroons....
Sarcasm off...
Respects,
Posted by: Gwedd at July 03, 2007 11:38 PM (xsmhm)
Please drop by the Blog, read, post a comment, bookmark us, and have a Happy 4th of July.
Regards,
Dale
Posted by: Dale in Atlanta at July 04, 2007 12:26 AM (BPJn5)
6
Don't be silly, good Leutenant. It was all the jooos fault. I saw it on the BBC.
Cancer? Also because of the jooos. Unhappiness? Ther jury's still out, but it looks like a jewish plot.
Posted by: Kevin at July 04, 2007 01:00 AM (1cRKV)
7
Don't forget 9-11. Those were Joooos controlling the laser beams that guided the empty dummy planes from Cheney's seeecret underground bunker near WTC7 into the Twin Towers.
Its soooo obvious, man.
Posted by: Good Lt at July 04, 2007 01:56 AM (yMbfY)
8
. . . and they lie, their feet stink and they don't love the Lord!
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at July 04, 2007 09:14 AM (Sd0Sv)
9
Happy 4th of July everyone. Even you greyrooster, you humorless, miss-the-point SOB.
Unfortunately, greyrooster, those who have the misfortune of having been born with mongoloidism had no choice in the matter. Such is NOT the case with BDS. Those having contracted BDS have done so willingly by eagerly sucking down the poisonous koolaide the demotrolls and their ilk serve up at sites like dhimmycraticunderpants.com and DailyPOS.
Viva BOOOOOSH!!! (said with a prayer that he'll someday "snap out of it" on immigration
Posted by: mrclark at July 04, 2007 10:18 AM (6SMFm)
10
In case you have not noticed, support for Congress dropped immediately when it became clear they were behaving like wimps.....not taking decisive action to stop the war and bring the troups home.
Posted by: Michael Weaver at July 04, 2007 02:38 PM (2OHpj)
13
mrclark: You dumb shit. You're the one who missed the point. Goes back a way and a stupid bastard like you isn't expected to get it. Always some nerd who doesn't get amd I don't fell like spelling it out for the slow. Dork!
Posted by: greyrooster at July 04, 2007 08:32 PM (rwEtt)
14In case you have not noticed, support for Congress dropped immediately
when it became clear they were behaving like wimps.....not
taking decisive action to stop the war and bring the troups home.
The exact same thing is true of Bush and his supporters. His polls are low because he's not conservative enough. But that never mattered to you when citing his numbers, you intellectualy dishonest prick.
I'm sure you have read all the deranged commenters on Huff Hate ramble on and on about Fox or as they call it Faux News. How clever. Bunch of two year olds....
Posted by: Weasel Zipper at June 29, 2007 05:39 PM (//96s)
3
Yeah...the guy had to go with the violence method as he must not of had enough of his friends with him to shout them down as they love to do about free speech on campus.
Posted by: Randman at June 29, 2007 07:58 PM (Sal3J)
The "Fairness Doctrine" = Broadcast Censorship
Posted by Alan Sears at Townhall.com:
In the wake of the pending final demise of bankrupt and scandal-plagued Air America, the Left continues to be frustrated by the fact that America simply isn’t tuning in to their propaganda. So, according to reports from various news outlets, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Steny Hoyer, Dennis Kucinich, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein are joining their friends at the far-left Center for American Progress to cook up a new plan: force radio stations to accept unwanted programming in the name of “fairness†and “balance.â€
Speaker Pelosi has reportedly promised to “aggressively pursue†revival of the poorly-titled “Fairness Doctrine,†whose regulations would mandate that radio stations featuring the views of conservatives like Michael Medved, Hugh Hewitt, or Bill O’Reilly “balance†those views (in the name of diversity) with an “equal†dose of, say, Al Franken, Randi Rhodes, or Thom Hartmann – all proven failures in a free radio market...
It’s time for the Left to cut the static: Behind the calls for “regulation†and “diversity†hides a posse of political bullies who realize that they cannot compete against the likes of Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh in a free market. The left-wing’s failure to capture anything beyond a tiny niche market isn’t the fault of the FCC, nor of the dormant Fairness Doctrine. The “blame†rests with radio listeners who came, listened, and chose to tune out of “Dead Air†America.
1
If the Dhimmicrats are successful in destroying Fair Speech on radio & TV with the "Fairness Doctrine", then I would not be surprised that they will try to force internet websites like The Jawa Report & Jihad Watch to post articles, videos, and interviews from Islamic Jihadists. Hey it is only "fair"!
Posted by: Darren at June 27, 2007 01:02 PM (UCVDK)
2
Lefturds always try to censure those they disagree with. Particularly, when they can't intelligently win an argument. Same as crying to mommy. Example: Shit head calling itself conservative voice.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 27, 2007 01:48 PM (u6sib)
3
Memo to Nancy, Teddy, Hillary, Bimbo Babs, Harry and the others,
The reason that lefty radio has failed is because it is a FREAKING JOKE! Having people like Stewie and his ilk put out your message has turned off people like me from wanting to hear your regurgitated pablum. If you don't like it that Rush, Sean and others are beating your @$$ on the radio, then get some people on the air that can put to concise thoughts and sentences together with out melting down, throw some of your "hard earned cash" out there and broadcast your message. Otherwise just sit down and shut up - you've still got NPR to put your tripe out there for you.
Posted by: fmfnavydoc at June 27, 2007 08:17 PM (I6QiV)
4
Now don't y'all be goin off and forgettin about Senator Trent Igot35yearsonthehillMrfairnessdoctorine Lott! The Mississippi goat fu*kin Mister Know-it-all, himself! Oh and a big FU to Lott's mini-me...fellow Senator Lindsey Graham!
Posted by: JihadGene at June 28, 2007 01:22 AM (l8Hl5)
5
I cant see how this is even remotely constitutional..... Government can control broadcasts of government funded stations ect. but privately funded stations should be out of reach. Even if they manage to pass it the supreme court will bitch slap it back to the shithole it belongs in.. On the plus side it would mean that NBC,ABC,CNN, ect.. would have to grant airtime to conservative speakers.
Posted by: steve at June 29, 2007 03:38 AM (c8R++)
6
The blogs are next. Free speech is to the Dhimmiecrats what an intern is to Bill Clinton.
Posted by: Thomas Jackson at July 01, 2007 03:50 PM (A2ZNt)
Democrats Violating House Rules With Witchhunt Website?
The stupidest scandal in history just got stupider, and this time, Democrats may be violating House rules in their pursuit of yet another non-crime.
Meanwhile, Democrat-controlled Congressional approval ratings continue to nosedive, while the press pretends it isn't in sync with "the most ethical, most open government in history."
Question: This is the Congress the press apparently wanted. Isn't it wonderful? They live together, they die together.
1
I can't wait for the inevitable Hillary! administration when she sacks all of the US attorneys within 6 months and the press completely ignores it.
Posted by: Shivv at June 22, 2007 04:28 AM (CdREx)
2
Shivv ALL US Attorneys always hand in their resignations when there is a change in administration.
According to the latest Gallup poll (June 2007) Americans still overwhelmingly prefer Democratic affiliation to Republican . Thenumbers 53 % to 37% are not even close. The single most important issue is the war in Iraq.
http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=15370
Posted by: John Ryan at June 22, 2007 11:08 AM (TcoRJ)
3Only 14% have faith in the Democrat-Controlled Congress, and their overall approval ratings are even lower than Bush's. No small feat getting that many people to hate you.
You're one of the 14%ers.
Everyone hates the Democrat Congress.
Posted by: Good Lt at June 22, 2007 11:47 AM (yMbfY)
4
Everyone hates John Ryan. John Ryan you nerdy little bugger eater. The majority doesn't run this or any other country. The 10% who can does. To bad you're to stupid to realize that. Stupid camel jockey in disguise.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 22, 2007 09:05 PM (k0DWG)
Faith in DemoCong: 14%Wow. I didn't think the Donks could do any worse than the GOP, but the monkeys pulled it off. In record time, and in grand fashion.
1
I had great faith in the Democrats ability to so completely disgrace themselves after taking control of Congress that Republicans would have a good chance at a rebound in the next general election.
I am very pleased that I was correct, although even I didn't think they could self-destruct so quickly. Unfortunately, I did not foresee the Republicans destroying themselves over immigration at the same time.
Posted by: novaculus at June 20, 2007 09:58 PM (jL6zR)
2
Told you they would self destruct. Just give them time. Now even the cry babies in the Chocolate City are complaining that the democratic congress won't help them. (What they call help is give me something free so I don't have to work).
Posted by: greyrooster at June 20, 2007 10:43 PM (evorT)
Call it "Pelosi diplomacy." Or treason. Whatever rolls off the tongue.
UPDATE by Rusty: I did some more research on Dal LaMagna and the man he met with, and didn't like what I found.
Aren't we Democrats revolutionary? Hahaha! I have a Stalin t-shirt at home! Hahaha!
Freikin' hilarious. Honestly. Wearing t-shirts emblazoned with likeness of communist murderers is apparently chic in the Democrat Party nowadays. Glad we know who their ideological forefathers and compatriots are.
Subsequent analysts have also shed light on aspects of cruelty in Guevara’s methods, and analyzed what Fidel Castro described as Guevara’s “excessively aggressive qualityâ€. Studies addressing problematic characteristics of Guevara's life have cited his principal role in setting up Cuba's first post-revolutionary labor camps, his unsympathetic treatment of captured fighters during various guerrilla campaigns, and his frequent humiliations of those deemed his intellectual inferiors. Though much opposition to Guevara's methods has come from the political right, critical evaluation has also come from groups such as anarchists and civil libertarians, some of whom consider Guevara an authoritarian, anti-working-class Stalinist, whose legacy was the creation of a more bureaucratic, authoritarian regime. Detractors have also theorized that in much of Latin America, Che-inspired revolutions had the practical result of reinforcing brutal militarism for many years.
1
too fucking funny but not telling us anything we don't already know.
Posted by: Randman at June 17, 2007 10:53 AM (Sal3J)
2
I have a Che shirt too, except on mine he's wearing a Mikey Mouse club cap with great big Mickey ears on it. My Lib brother says he finds it "offensive." LOL.
3
Tell him you find racist communist authoritarian killers offensive. Especially those personally order the executions of hundreds of women and children.
I'd be interested to hear his response.
Posted by: Good Lt at June 17, 2007 12:02 PM (yMbfY)
4
The "Talk" pages for Che are hilarious -- absolutely packed with frothing moonbat logic such as:
"Whether he murdered or not, to call him a thug is insulting. He is a revolutionary. How does does a revolutionary take and consilidate power? Violence. He is far from a murderous thug."
"Okay, then I say Ronald Regan was a genocidal murderer. They both killed people didn't they? The difference is Ronald Reagan got people to do it for him while Che did it himself. While were at it, lets round up all the revolutionary war heroes who killed and call them murderous thugs cause it doesn't suit your idealogy"
Posted by: davec at June 17, 2007 02:16 PM (kcDpP)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 17, 2007 02:53 PM (2OHpj)
7
I have one with that picture too. Except mine has a $ stamped on the forehead and says "This shirt brought to you by capitalism". I love wearing it. Especially on every lib college campus I can find.
Posted by: Robert at June 17, 2007 07:24 PM (4K3dJ)
8
Leave it to hillary to be hob nobbin with the reds we dont need another evil clinton in the whitehouse
Posted by: sandpiper at June 17, 2007 10:11 PM (sUgrV)
9"Whether he murdered or not, to call him a thug is insulting. He is
a revolutionary. How does does a revolutionary take and consilidate
power?
Shorter leftard: Yes, but he's OUR genocidal murderer.
Pelosi Wants You To Fly Her Family AroundPay for it, peasants! The Pelosi family members need private, tax-payer funded jets. Don't ask questions - just open your wallets and dish it out.
The very fate of the nation and of your children hangs in the balance.
1
Maybe Manbearpig can sell her some of his carbon offsets.
Posted by: Kafir at June 14, 2007 11:10 AM (HsmTD)
2
Were a repubic but she thinks were a monarcy she thinks her family deserves special prilages Might i suggest they flap their arms SQUAWK SQUAWK WE BIRDS CAN BE FUNNY
Posted by: sandpiper at June 15, 2007 12:58 AM (g1M1/)
USA, all the way!
