November 12, 2006
Wear a Hajib/Turban Day
(Fremont, California) Attention, readers! Tomorrow is "Wear a Hijab/Turban to Work/School Day" in Fremont. Among others, the event is being promoted by the Foundation for Self-Reliance, the American Muslim Alliance and SEMAH, a domestic violence group.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
From InsideBayArea.com:
"This is more than just 'wear a hijab or turban' day," said Samina F. Sundas, founder of the Newark-based American Muslim Voice and Global Peace Partners. "It's about educating each other about our differences and recognizing that we should focus on what binds us together."So, although the police haven't identified a motive in the Ansari killing, the Muslim community is taking immediate corrective action against hate crime. Notably, this response is consistent with Muslim reactions to perceived hate crimes in other regions of the globe. In those cases, however, corrective measures are more strident. Instead of 'Wear a Hajib/Turban,' everyone is simply encouraged to don an explosive vest.The idea for the event originated days after Alia Ansari, a 38-year-old Afghan woman from Fremont, was gunned down Oct. 19 as she walked with her 3-year-old daughter to pick up some of her other children from an elementary school.
Police have yet to declare a motive in the Ansari case, but the perception among some in the community is that the shooting had to be a hate crime because Ansari was wearing a hijab, the traditional Muslim head scarf.
Presumably, the next time a Jew is killed in a suspected hate crime, organizers will promote a "Wear a Star of David/Yarmulka to Work/School Day." Of course, don't expect the media to pleasantly encourage the public to participate.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
09:05 AM
| Comments (72)
| Add Comment
Post contains 267 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Ah yes, because we all know that wearing a hijab or turbin is what we all have in common that binds us together.
Posted by: Oyster at November 12, 2006 10:13 AM (YudAC)
2
I wonder if members of the Sikh community will participate.
Somehow, I do not think there is much commonality that binds
Sikhs to muhammedans with/without the turbin.
Somehow, I do not think there is much commonality that binds
Sikhs to muhammedans with/without the turbin.
Posted by: heroyalwhyness at November 12, 2006 10:31 AM (MAPKL)
3
Police have yet to declare a motive in the Ansari case, but the
perception among some in the community is that the shooting had to be a
hate crime
Interesting how common honor killings are in the muslim community, but crickets chirping. They're more concerned with the ever elusive "hate crimes." Says a lot. And Leftard silence also speaks volumes.
perception among some in the community is that the shooting had to be a
hate crime
Interesting how common honor killings are in the muslim community, but crickets chirping. They're more concerned with the ever elusive "hate crimes." Says a lot. And Leftard silence also speaks volumes.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 12, 2006 10:33 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: JeepThang at November 12, 2006 10:53 AM (yZQoS)
5
I have been following this story. Most of the articles at first went
ahead and claimed it was a hate crime and she was killed for only being
Muslim. Their proof.....why else would anybody randomly kill somebody
on the street in such a peaceful utopia as Fremont. What bullshit.
ahead and claimed it was a hate crime and she was killed for only being
Muslim. Their proof.....why else would anybody randomly kill somebody
on the street in such a peaceful utopia as Fremont. What bullshit.
Posted by: Randman at November 12, 2006 11:03 AM (Sal3J)
6
I guess you support freedom of religion, only if it is a religion that you approve of.
Christians and Jews are OK, right?
Of course, a lot of you are not too crazy about the Jews, either, since they are the ones that killed Jesus.
Any other religions that meet with your approval?
Which ones would you ban, in this country, if you could, besides Islam, since we all know that all Muslims are terrorists, don't we?
If I were you, I wouldn't be trying to piss off any more Muslims, especially the one million plus that are living in America.
There are still a few left, that President Moron, hasn't pissed off, yet, but he keeps trying.
And with your help, he is succeeding on pissing off the rest of them.
Kudos, all around, to President Moron and you guys, for helping to make the world a more dangerous place.
Christians and Jews are OK, right?
Of course, a lot of you are not too crazy about the Jews, either, since they are the ones that killed Jesus.
Any other religions that meet with your approval?
Which ones would you ban, in this country, if you could, besides Islam, since we all know that all Muslims are terrorists, don't we?
If I were you, I wouldn't be trying to piss off any more Muslims, especially the one million plus that are living in America.
There are still a few left, that President Moron, hasn't pissed off, yet, but he keeps trying.
And with your help, he is succeeding on pissing off the rest of them.
Kudos, all around, to President Moron and you guys, for helping to make the world a more dangerous place.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 11:06 AM (qBTkS)
Posted by: Oyster at November 12, 2006 11:12 AM (YudAC)
8
"Ah yes, because we all know that wearing a hijab or turbin is what we all have in common that binds us together.
Posted by: Oyster"
No, what binds you and your friends together is wrapping yourselves in the American flag and pretending that you are patriotic Americans, while you try to label everyone that doesn't agree with you as cowards and traitors.
Real Americans have voted the party of cowards and traitors out of office (except for the biggest one, who can't run again, anyway).
Posted by: Oyster"
No, what binds you and your friends together is wrapping yourselves in the American flag and pretending that you are patriotic Americans, while you try to label everyone that doesn't agree with you as cowards and traitors.
Real Americans have voted the party of cowards and traitors out of office (except for the biggest one, who can't run again, anyway).
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 11:14 AM (qBTkS)
9
"I love Sunday morning threads. The moonbats are usually asleep 'til noon.
Posted by: Oyster "
Yep, Oyster, you beat the Moonbats out of bed by a whole hour.
But it seems that your eyes (and mind) are still closed, no matter what time you get up.
Posted by: Oyster "
Yep, Oyster, you beat the Moonbats out of bed by a whole hour.
But it seems that your eyes (and mind) are still closed, no matter what time you get up.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 11:18 AM (qBTkS)
10
Oyster -
Actually, at 6AM, I was paying bills and praying for the tax increases on the rich, that will begin to get us out of the debt that President Moron has put us in.
Actually, at 6AM, I was paying bills and praying for the tax increases on the rich, that will begin to get us out of the debt that President Moron has put us in.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 11:21 AM (qBTkS)
11
Yeah - of course it was a "hate" crime. Most crimes of violence involve an element of hating the other person. But I'd wager it's not a "hate" crime in the moonbat sense. It probably was a "honor killing". Consider, from the San Francisco Chronicle article on her killing:
1. The slaying marks the second time someone in the victim's family has been shot and killed in Fremont. . . The suspected gunman in that incident, upset over a spurned romance, also wounded Rahim Ansari's brother-in-law . . .
2. She typically drove to pick up two of her daughters from Glenmoor Elementary School, but left home on foot Thursday because of engine trouble. Witnesses said a man got out of a car, approached her and shot her at point-blank range before returning to the car and speeding away.
So - her family has fallen victim to a previous "honor killing" and her car just happens to develop engine trouble so she's forced to walk, where she gets killed. It sounds like an inside job - the person had access to her car to ensure that she was forced to walk to pick up the kids and the murderer knew she had to pick up the kids so he knew what time to hit his mark.
No. It doesn't look like a hate crime against Islam. It look suspiciously like a hate crime caused by the religion of hate - Islam.
1. The slaying marks the second time someone in the victim's family has been shot and killed in Fremont. . . The suspected gunman in that incident, upset over a spurned romance, also wounded Rahim Ansari's brother-in-law . . .
2. She typically drove to pick up two of her daughters from Glenmoor Elementary School, but left home on foot Thursday because of engine trouble. Witnesses said a man got out of a car, approached her and shot her at point-blank range before returning to the car and speeding away.
So - her family has fallen victim to a previous "honor killing" and her car just happens to develop engine trouble so she's forced to walk, where she gets killed. It sounds like an inside job - the person had access to her car to ensure that she was forced to walk to pick up the kids and the murderer knew she had to pick up the kids so he knew what time to hit his mark.
No. It doesn't look like a hate crime against Islam. It look suspiciously like a hate crime caused by the religion of hate - Islam.
Posted by: Ansar Al-kuffir at November 12, 2006 12:08 PM (KjO46)
Posted by: Oyster at November 12, 2006 12:08 PM (YudAC)
13
When I first read this story, this woman and her children were actually living in a shelter for domestic abuse victims.
Now tell me, how many domestic abuse victims are hunted down and killed in this country?
Why is that not being reported now?
Suddenly, this is a hate crime?
Where is the muslim husband she was fleeing in the first place?
Now tell me, how many domestic abuse victims are hunted down and killed in this country?
Why is that not being reported now?
Suddenly, this is a hate crime?
Where is the muslim husband she was fleeing in the first place?
Posted by: Melissa In Texas at November 12, 2006 12:51 PM (bbxLM)
14
Seems the moonbats are feeling froggy lately. I've noticed quite a few taking up space at various blogs since the election. Pity, they never seemed to have learned that a smart mouth doesn't denote a smart mind.
But they ARE amusing in their own mentally retarded way. Reading the postings of someone like puddleduck reaffirms my belief in their own eventual self-destruction.
But they ARE amusing in their own mentally retarded way. Reading the postings of someone like puddleduck reaffirms my belief in their own eventual self-destruction.
Posted by: Subvet at November 12, 2006 12:53 PM (DNVxw)
15
"But they ARE amusing in their own mentally retarded way. Reading the postings of someone like puddleduck reaffirms my belief in their own eventual self-destruction.
Posted by: Subvet"
Thanks for the compliment, Subvet!!
It is my sole purpose to keep you and your little friends amused.
It isn't really much of a challenge, though, since simple minds are easily amused, anyway.
But thanks for the compliment, anyway.
And Oyster -
"Puddleduck: It took you three posts to try and put me in my
place? Try again. You just go ahead cheer on the rollback
on tax cuts. It's going to affect middle class America too.
But hey, as long as those disgusting rich people get punished who
cares, right?
You're going to have to get up a lot earlier than 6am.
Posted by: Oyster"
"Rollback of the tax cuts"?
Where did you get that? That is a Democrat talking point. Are you, actually, a closet Democrat?
The Republican talking point is that the Democrats are going to "raise your taxes", not that they are going to "rollback the tax cuts".
What happened? Did you let your subscription to the Daily GOP talking points newsletter run out?
You're right, Oyster.
Even the middle class is going to ante up their fair share of taxes to pay for the economic disaster that President Moron has made of this country.
If we don't raise taxes now, all we are doing is putting more of a tax burden on our children and grandchildren or don't you care about your children's future?
And you shouldn't worry about taxes going up.
Since you are such a fucking genius, you must be rich and can afford to pay more taxes.
Yep, I would have to get up earlier than 6AM to outsmart you.
You continue, with each post, to further convince me of your superior intelligence.
Posted by: Subvet"
Thanks for the compliment, Subvet!!
It is my sole purpose to keep you and your little friends amused.
It isn't really much of a challenge, though, since simple minds are easily amused, anyway.
But thanks for the compliment, anyway.
And Oyster -
"Puddleduck: It took you three posts to try and put me in my
place? Try again. You just go ahead cheer on the rollback
on tax cuts. It's going to affect middle class America too.
But hey, as long as those disgusting rich people get punished who
cares, right?
You're going to have to get up a lot earlier than 6am.
Posted by: Oyster"
"Rollback of the tax cuts"?
Where did you get that? That is a Democrat talking point. Are you, actually, a closet Democrat?
The Republican talking point is that the Democrats are going to "raise your taxes", not that they are going to "rollback the tax cuts".
What happened? Did you let your subscription to the Daily GOP talking points newsletter run out?
You're right, Oyster.
Even the middle class is going to ante up their fair share of taxes to pay for the economic disaster that President Moron has made of this country.
If we don't raise taxes now, all we are doing is putting more of a tax burden on our children and grandchildren or don't you care about your children's future?
And you shouldn't worry about taxes going up.
Since you are such a fucking genius, you must be rich and can afford to pay more taxes.
Yep, I would have to get up earlier than 6AM to outsmart you.
You continue, with each post, to further convince me of your superior intelligence.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 12:54 PM (qBTkS)
16
"I hear plenty of Lefties saying they want to ban ALL religion. I'm sure you'd approve of that, except for your religion of course (Liberalism).
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos"
Let me know who that Lefty is, and I promise to go have a talk with him.
Thanks for the info.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos"
Let me know who that Lefty is, and I promise to go have a talk with him.
Thanks for the info.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 12:57 PM (qBTkS)
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 01:00 PM (qBTkS)
18
""the rich"
To a Dem, anybody who makes more than 50K.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos "
Sounds good to me. I don't mind paying my fair share.
How about you?
Or you want to continue enjoying the free ride?
To a Dem, anybody who makes more than 50K.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos "
Sounds good to me. I don't mind paying my fair share.
How about you?
Or you want to continue enjoying the free ride?
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 01:02 PM (qBTkS)
19
Is the murder rate driven more by culture or by religion ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_murder_rate
The countries with the highest rates are overwhelmingly "christian"
In the United States the most horriffic recent mass murder was the killing of the Amish schoolgirls. In his suicide note the shooter wrote about how angry he was with his God
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15113706/
Honor killings occur in many countries, both christian and muslim. It was only in the past decade that Brazil finally outlawed honor killing of wives.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killings
The countries with the highest rates are overwhelmingly "christian"
In the United States the most horriffic recent mass murder was the killing of the Amish schoolgirls. In his suicide note the shooter wrote about how angry he was with his God
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15113706/
Honor killings occur in many countries, both christian and muslim. It was only in the past decade that Brazil finally outlawed honor killing of wives.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killings
Posted by: john ryan at November 12, 2006 01:03 PM (TcoRJ)
20
Puddleduck: It took you three posts to try and put me in my
place? Try again. You just go ahead cheer on the rollback
on tax cuts. It's going to affect middle class America too.
But hey, as long as those disgusting rich people get punished who
cares, right?
You're going to have to get up a lot earlier than 6am.
place? Try again. You just go ahead cheer on the rollback
on tax cuts. It's going to affect middle class America too.
But hey, as long as those disgusting rich people get punished who
cares, right?
You're going to have to get up a lot earlier than 6am.
Posted by: Oyster at November 12, 2006 01:04 PM (YudAC)
21
john ryan: you're assuming that communist countries and the middle east are releasing accurate statistics. That's a lot of assuming.
Posted by: Oyster at November 12, 2006 01:18 PM (YudAC)
22
Any other religions that meet with your approval?
Piddle,
I hear plenty of Lefties saying they want to ban ALL religion. I'm sure you'd approve of that, except for your religion of course (Liberalism).
Any other religions that meet with your approval?
Piddle,
I hear plenty of Lefties saying they want to ban ALL religion. I'm sure you'd approve of that, except for your religion of course (Liberalism).
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 12, 2006 01:52 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 12, 2006 01:54 PM (8e/V4)
24
ISRAEL LOBBY SAYS PENTAGON ‘INFILTRATED’
HOSTILITY TO ZIONISM SEEN AS ‘MAJOR THREAT’
“A leading voice of the pro-Israel lobby is pushing for an old-style “witchhuntâ€â€”under the guise of “homeland securityâ€â€”to identify (and expel) individuals in the U.S. government and our military who are suspected of being hostile to Israel.â€
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/pentagon__infiltrated_.html
The Israelis just won’t be happy unless we put their interests ahead of our own.
HOSTILITY TO ZIONISM SEEN AS ‘MAJOR THREAT’
“A leading voice of the pro-Israel lobby is pushing for an old-style “witchhuntâ€â€”under the guise of “homeland securityâ€â€”to identify (and expel) individuals in the U.S. government and our military who are suspected of being hostile to Israel.â€
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/pentagon__infiltrated_.html
The Israelis just won’t be happy unless we put their interests ahead of our own.
Posted by: Greg at November 12, 2006 02:40 PM (19GwZ)
25
Puddleduck: Charlie Rangel, soon to be Chairman of the Ways and
Means Committee, has been calling for a repeal of the tax cuts since
they were enacted. Many other Democrats have as well.
Talking point my ass. You'd better do more reading.
Personally, I'm not at all comfortable with you deciding whether I've
paid my "fair share". How could you possibly know whether I'm
"rich" or "poor"? Whether I've paid enough to suit your idea of
who should pay what. You're just playing big-mouth with no brain
behind it. I do believe you're quickly surpassing Greg in the
dangerous idiot department.
Means Committee, has been calling for a repeal of the tax cuts since
they were enacted. Many other Democrats have as well.
Talking point my ass. You'd better do more reading.
Personally, I'm not at all comfortable with you deciding whether I've
paid my "fair share". How could you possibly know whether I'm
"rich" or "poor"? Whether I've paid enough to suit your idea of
who should pay what. You're just playing big-mouth with no brain
behind it. I do believe you're quickly surpassing Greg in the
dangerous idiot department.
Posted by: Oyster at November 12, 2006 02:45 PM (YudAC)
26
Excellent! I'm glad somebody on the correct side of the mental spectrum is weighing in on this.
I live pretty close to Fremont and it's driving me crazy that more people aren't seeing this for the crock that it is.
Whoever did this was described as a "Latino or Black" man--(I would also suggest Middle Eastern) Whoever it was got out of the car and walked towards this woman. So it's unlikely that the killer was just looking for any Muslim--it seemed like they were going after a specific Muslim woman. Add to this the fact that the husband, who owned his own mechanic shop left after the funeral with his children to Afghanistan citing economic reasons (as if owning your own business in the West is not as economically viable as living in Afghanistan)
Another thing that is not getting much media play--mentioned just once in the Chronicle after paragraphs denouncing video games, Christians, and talk radio--that four years ago a similar shooting took place in the same family over a "spurned relationship".
I'm willing to bet anything this was an honor killing. And here we are again sponsoring a Let's All Convert Day. . .
Good work, Jawa!
I live pretty close to Fremont and it's driving me crazy that more people aren't seeing this for the crock that it is.
Whoever did this was described as a "Latino or Black" man--(I would also suggest Middle Eastern) Whoever it was got out of the car and walked towards this woman. So it's unlikely that the killer was just looking for any Muslim--it seemed like they were going after a specific Muslim woman. Add to this the fact that the husband, who owned his own mechanic shop left after the funeral with his children to Afghanistan citing economic reasons (as if owning your own business in the West is not as economically viable as living in Afghanistan)
Another thing that is not getting much media play--mentioned just once in the Chronicle after paragraphs denouncing video games, Christians, and talk radio--that four years ago a similar shooting took place in the same family over a "spurned relationship".
I'm willing to bet anything this was an honor killing. And here we are again sponsoring a Let's All Convert Day. . .
Good work, Jawa!
Posted by: Will at November 12, 2006 03:09 PM (adqPE)
27
The commentaries, not surprisingly, named such countries as Iran,
Syria, Russia and Venezuela, as possible “adversaries†for the
U.S.-Israel Axis.
Greg,
given these countries ARE our adversaries or enemies, how is the joooish lobby putting Israel's interests before our own? Methinks it's moonbats and Leftards putting our enemies interests before our own (as usual).
Syria, Russia and Venezuela, as possible “adversaries†for the
U.S.-Israel Axis.
Greg,
given these countries ARE our adversaries or enemies, how is the joooish lobby putting Israel's interests before our own? Methinks it's moonbats and Leftards putting our enemies interests before our own (as usual).
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 12, 2006 03:13 PM (8e/V4)
28
"Puddleduck: Charlie Rangel, soon to be Chairman of the Ways and
Means Committee, has been calling for a repeal of the tax cuts since
they were enacted. Many other Democrats have as well.
Talking point my ass. You'd better do more reading.
Personally, I'm not at all comfortable with you deciding whether I've
paid my "fair share". How could you possibly know whether I'm
"rich" or "poor"? Whether I've paid enough to suit your idea of
who should pay what. You're just playing big-mouth with no brain
behind it. I do believe you're quickly surpassing Greg in the
dangerous idiot department.
Posted by: Oyster"
Good for Charlie.
He will be doing what the majority of Americans want him to do, instead of the minority Right Wing.
Whatever you are paying, it's not enough.
I'm planning on passing Greg in the dangerous idiot department (with apologies to Greg for stealing his title).
Then I will be running a distant second to you.
Waterfowl rule and mollusks drool!!
Means Committee, has been calling for a repeal of the tax cuts since
they were enacted. Many other Democrats have as well.
Talking point my ass. You'd better do more reading.
Personally, I'm not at all comfortable with you deciding whether I've
paid my "fair share". How could you possibly know whether I'm
"rich" or "poor"? Whether I've paid enough to suit your idea of
who should pay what. You're just playing big-mouth with no brain
behind it. I do believe you're quickly surpassing Greg in the
dangerous idiot department.
Posted by: Oyster"
Good for Charlie.
He will be doing what the majority of Americans want him to do, instead of the minority Right Wing.
Whatever you are paying, it's not enough.
I'm planning on passing Greg in the dangerous idiot department (with apologies to Greg for stealing his title).
Then I will be running a distant second to you.
Waterfowl rule and mollusks drool!!
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 03:23 PM (qBTkS)
29
I propose, "wear a zonar day!" If you are a Jew or Christian you can dress in traditional middle eastern garb, but to distinguish yourself as one of the 'protected peoples' you must weat a yellow sash or star of David badge. Just the way the 'People of the Book' had done in Muslim occupied Jerusalem for centuries!
Posted by: Jimmy the Dhimmi at November 12, 2006 03:50 PM (CI4Lt)
30
Better idea. All Moslems to wear a NY Yankees baseball cap to school.
Posted by: bird dog at November 12, 2006 03:56 PM (L5LRS)
31
It was a common garden variety honor killing, and the Leftards are turning a blind eye to it, and worse enabling it by always blaming it on whitey and "racism", as usual (even though islam isn't a race you effing morons. No wonder they call Liberalism a mental disorder).
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 12, 2006 04:27 PM (8e/V4)
32
So Puddledick...I wonder why you support sex with children. Is it because your an atheist?
Posted by: Randman at November 12, 2006 04:58 PM (Sal3J)
33
I think all of the US Senate should show solidarity with the Islamic Facists by wearing of the hajib at their very next session on the hill. Suicide vests and Koran's optional.
Posted by: JihadGene at November 12, 2006 05:27 PM (ywiyu)
34
Fuddleduck, one of your rock star queer heros Elton John recently called for the banning of religion. Go talk to him, you idiot, and I hope and pray that you fools raise taxes on the middle class. The two year reign of you leftists will be most satisfying. I doubt you will be around here then with your goofy logic.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 12, 2006 07:12 PM (8PoNP)
35
Wear something to identify me with a bunch of murdering slime. No way. A hundred million people in the U.S. are on the verge of opening fire on everyone of these nuts. Maybe within a couple of months it will happen. You know the crazies are in charge now so anything is possible. Roadside bombs will be common in the U.S. in less than six months of leftie rule. That you can bet on. They supported the terrorists and the terrorists supported them during the election, now the terrorists want a payback and letting them in the U.S. to carry out their attacks will be allowed by the dim's.
How many dim's went to Iraq to dip their hands in the blood of the Iraqi people that were slaughtered today for the benefit of the dim's get out of Iraq plan. Millions will be slaughtered and the dim's could care less/ That is also a fact.
How many dim's went to Iraq to dip their hands in the blood of the Iraqi people that were slaughtered today for the benefit of the dim's get out of Iraq plan. Millions will be slaughtered and the dim's could care less/ That is also a fact.
Posted by: Scrapiron at November 12, 2006 07:38 PM (rqlgb)
Posted by: Oyster at November 12, 2006 07:46 PM (YudAC)
37
I think that was an honor killing. Most certainly a hate crime against women.
Posted by: RepJ at November 12, 2006 08:17 PM (XXEg4)
38
Puddle Duck needs to realize that the first move by his Democrat buddies is a tax cut on those making between $100K & $500K.
But then again, he seems to believe in the "It all belongs to the government" school of liberalism.
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/204730.php
But then again, he seems to believe in the "It all belongs to the government" school of liberalism.
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/204730.php
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at November 12, 2006 09:17 PM (kLVxs)
39
"So Puddledick...I wonder why you support sex with children. Is it because your an atheist?
Posted by: Randman"
I think you have me confused me with the, former, GOP controlled congress, where they separate the men from the boys....with a crowbar.
You don't have to be an Atheist to understand how important the concept of separation of church and state is, but that would be getting off topic, wouldn't it?
I have seen only 2 religions that meet with your approval, so far.
Are there any more, that you approve of?
What about the list of religions that you would ban, besides Islam?
Posted by: Randman"
I think you have me confused me with the, former, GOP controlled congress, where they separate the men from the boys....with a crowbar.
You don't have to be an Atheist to understand how important the concept of separation of church and state is, but that would be getting off topic, wouldn't it?
I have seen only 2 religions that meet with your approval, so far.
Are there any more, that you approve of?
What about the list of religions that you would ban, besides Islam?
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 13, 2006 06:14 AM (qBTkS)
40
"Fuddleduck, one of your rock star queer heros Elton John recently called for the banning of religion. Go talk to him, you idiot, and I hope and pray that you fools raise taxes on the middle class. The two year reign of you leftists will be most satisfying. I doubt you will be around here then with your goofy logic.
Posted by: jesusland joe"
When did Elton John become an American citizen?
....and you call me an idiot??
But, to be "fair and balanced", I guess that on this website, you are considered to be a "genius?.
Got anything more? So far, the straw grasping doesn't seem to be paying off, for you or your buddies.
You really have have to do better.
Now sit back, take a deep breath and say to yourself - "I'm going to put this lefturd in his place, using my superior wit and carefully developed and well reasoned logic, rather than the elementary school rants, that don't seem to be working, so far".
The short story - think before you post again, about some foreign national, like Sir Elton John, and his views on religion or any other subject that has nothing to do with life in the US.
Posted by: jesusland joe"
When did Elton John become an American citizen?
....and you call me an idiot??
But, to be "fair and balanced", I guess that on this website, you are considered to be a "genius?.
Got anything more? So far, the straw grasping doesn't seem to be paying off, for you or your buddies.
You really have have to do better.
Now sit back, take a deep breath and say to yourself - "I'm going to put this lefturd in his place, using my superior wit and carefully developed and well reasoned logic, rather than the elementary school rants, that don't seem to be working, so far".
The short story - think before you post again, about some foreign national, like Sir Elton John, and his views on religion or any other subject that has nothing to do with life in the US.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 13, 2006 06:29 AM (qBTkS)
41
"Wear something to identify me with a bunch of murdering slime. No way. A hundred million people in the U.S. are on the verge of opening fire on everyone of these nuts. Maybe within a couple of months it will happen. You know the crazies are in charge now so anything is possible. Roadside bombs will be common in the U.S. in less than six months of leftie rule. That you can bet on. They supported the terrorists and the terrorists supported them during the election, now the terrorists want a payback and letting them in the U.S. to carry out their attacks will be allowed by the dim's.
How many dim's went to Iraq to dip their hands in the blood of the Iraqi people that were slaughtered today for the benefit of the dim's get out of Iraq plan. Millions will be slaughtered and the dim's could care less/ That is also a fact.
Posted by: Scrapiron "
Those mountain "cave" lots are going fast.
Act now, before it's too late.
And start watching for those after Christmas sales of guns and ammo at Wal-Mart.
"Millions will be slaughtered and the dim's could care less/ That is also a fact".
BTW - glad you can state "facts", as well as your President Moron.
One man's fiction is another man's "fact", eh Scrapiron?
The election is over. America won. You lost. Get over it.
How many dim's went to Iraq to dip their hands in the blood of the Iraqi people that were slaughtered today for the benefit of the dim's get out of Iraq plan. Millions will be slaughtered and the dim's could care less/ That is also a fact.
Posted by: Scrapiron "
Those mountain "cave" lots are going fast.
Act now, before it's too late.
And start watching for those after Christmas sales of guns and ammo at Wal-Mart.
"Millions will be slaughtered and the dim's could care less/ That is also a fact".
BTW - glad you can state "facts", as well as your President Moron.
One man's fiction is another man's "fact", eh Scrapiron?
The election is over. America won. You lost. Get over it.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 13, 2006 06:39 AM (qBTkS)
42
"Scrapiron, I think your predictions are extreme. Roadside bombs in six months?
Posted by: Oyster"
Oh, give Scrapiron a break, Oyster.
If you are real nice to him, he may let you help him set up his stash of IEDs in Muslim neighborhoods.
You can wave at the Muslims, traveling, in the opposite direction, to plant IEDs in your neighborhood.
What fun, huh?
Posted by: Oyster"
Oh, give Scrapiron a break, Oyster.
If you are real nice to him, he may let you help him set up his stash of IEDs in Muslim neighborhoods.
You can wave at the Muslims, traveling, in the opposite direction, to plant IEDs in your neighborhood.
What fun, huh?
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 13, 2006 06:45 AM (qBTkS)
43
"Puddle Duck needs to realize that the first move by his Democrat buddies is a tax cut on those making between $100K & $500K.
But then again, he seems to believe in the "It all belongs to the government" school of liberalism."
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/204730.php
Posted by: Rhymes With Right"
2 points -
1. I'm not in favor of cutting taxes for those making between $100K & $500K.
You must have me confused with one of those deficit/national debt-increasing, spend and spend, Republicans.
2. "It all belongs to the government" school of liberalism.
Thanks for straightening me out on this point.
I was under the mistaken impression that WE were the government, or didn't you vote in the last election (or wasn't your vote counted on the new electronic voting machine?).
I thought we were supposed to have "government of the people, by the people and for the people".
So, who is this "government" that you are talking about?
But I can't blame you for being confused, since that expression was changed 6 years ago to "government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich".
If you are nice to "Job", he might lend you his towel, to throw in when he finds it.
But then again, he seems to believe in the "It all belongs to the government" school of liberalism."
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/204730.php
Posted by: Rhymes With Right"
2 points -
1. I'm not in favor of cutting taxes for those making between $100K & $500K.
You must have me confused with one of those deficit/national debt-increasing, spend and spend, Republicans.
2. "It all belongs to the government" school of liberalism.
Thanks for straightening me out on this point.
I was under the mistaken impression that WE were the government, or didn't you vote in the last election (or wasn't your vote counted on the new electronic voting machine?).
I thought we were supposed to have "government of the people, by the people and for the people".
So, who is this "government" that you are talking about?
But I can't blame you for being confused, since that expression was changed 6 years ago to "government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich".
If you are nice to "Job", he might lend you his towel, to throw in when he finds it.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 13, 2006 07:04 AM (qBTkS)
44
befuddled duck, are you drunk this early in the morning? It seems so. You know Sir Elton is immensely popular with you leftists, being a queer and a rock star, and even a Sir, which is something you "celebrity-worshipping liberals" admire and seek to attain.
I see you leftists post time after time about how all the foreigners hate us now, so I know you are a good lefty and wish to be popular again. That would be a great place for you to start.
I see you leftists post time after time about how all the foreigners hate us now, so I know you are a good lefty and wish to be popular again. That would be a great place for you to start.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 13, 2006 10:06 AM (8PoNP)
45
Another cool quote from Elton John, "I'll fuck anything, but I draw the line at goats." He doesn't elobrate on which side of the line the goat is on.
Posted by: Howie at November 13, 2006 10:11 AM (D3+20)
46
"Being a queer."
Wow. Are always this tolerant? Or just homophobic. I sincerely hope you don't speak this way around children. Even if you do, have no fear, they'll so learn what a bigot you have exposed yourself to be.
Wow. Are always this tolerant? Or just homophobic. I sincerely hope you don't speak this way around children. Even if you do, have no fear, they'll so learn what a bigot you have exposed yourself to be.
Posted by: No Fear at November 13, 2006 10:41 AM (ZQepB)
47
What exactly is bigoted about the word queer? Is it any different than homo? I taught my children that gay is a word that means happy, not one that describes sexual orientation. Why should that bother you?
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 13, 2006 11:14 AM (8PoNP)
48
Definitions of queer on the Web:
Offensive terms for an openly homosexual man. Its usage is controversial and underwent substantial changes over the course of the 20th century. It is considered to be offensive and derisive.
Or:
NOUN:
Offensive Slang Used as a disparaging term for a homosexual person.
How is it you don't know this? I cannot decide if your bigotry exceeds you ignorance, or if it's the other way around.
Offensive terms for an openly homosexual man. Its usage is controversial and underwent substantial changes over the course of the 20th century. It is considered to be offensive and derisive.
Or:
NOUN:
Offensive Slang Used as a disparaging term for a homosexual person.
How is it you don't know this? I cannot decide if your bigotry exceeds you ignorance, or if it's the other way around.
Posted by: No Fear at November 13, 2006 11:35 AM (ZQepB)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 13, 2006 11:37 AM (8e/V4)
50
Great responce. That's the best you can come up with to defend yourself. Ok, well I always knew that ignorance and intolerance were one and the same. Have yourself a gay day.
Posted by: No Fear at November 13, 2006 11:42 AM (ZQepB)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 13, 2006 11:44 AM (8e/V4)
52
And so I shall, No Fear. I don't let others determine what I say or believe, or whether I meant it to be offensive or not. I know exactly what I meant, and had I wished it to be offensive to homos or queers, I could have made it so. One of the biggest problems we have in this country is the claiming of victimhood by every group of some kind. We are becoming a thin-skinned, nansy-pansy bunch of people. Now grow up, NoFear, and live up to your nick.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 13, 2006 11:49 AM (8PoNP)
53
I just gave the definitions. I didn't make them up. You have made yourself clear. In so many way all over this blog. It's sad really.
See ya wouldn't wanta be ya.
See ya wouldn't wanta be ya.
Posted by: No Fear at November 13, 2006 11:56 AM (ZQepB)
54
That's ok, NoFear, my self esteem is never dependant on whether I am popular or not, or whether someone understands what I mean or not. As for what I have made myself clear on other comments on this blog, I know exactly what my positions are. If you don't like them, so be it. After reading your comments, I wouldn't want to be you either. So we're even. And since this is a right-of-center blog, what the hell did you expect, socialism?
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 13, 2006 12:06 PM (8PoNP)
55
My expectations are not the issue. I accept things as they are. From the way you express yourself you make your position clear. I'm not suprised by that.
Let me educate you on a couple of things. I'm
Sicilian. If my 2nd cousin calls me a dago we're cool. But IF, the Irish kid from the next block over calls me a dago...you know where we're gonna go. So if you call a queer a queer you best be one buddy. Otherwise you have insulted alot of good men and women. It's the same for people of other colors or religions.
Calling people towel heads is not cool.
Calling people kikes is not cool.
If you are in a resturant and you say hey look there's a queer....
Calling people a QUEER IS BIGOTRY. Ya got that?
If you truley do believe that's not offensive, and you meant no harm, find another way of expressing yourself.
BTW, how do you stant on Gay marriage. But before you get you undies in a bunch here's the definition:
joining in wedlock: the joining together in wedlock of two people
union of two things: a close union, blend, or mixture of two things
Let me educate you on a couple of things. I'm
Sicilian. If my 2nd cousin calls me a dago we're cool. But IF, the Irish kid from the next block over calls me a dago...you know where we're gonna go. So if you call a queer a queer you best be one buddy. Otherwise you have insulted alot of good men and women. It's the same for people of other colors or religions.
Calling people towel heads is not cool.
Calling people kikes is not cool.
If you are in a resturant and you say hey look there's a queer....
Calling people a QUEER IS BIGOTRY. Ya got that?
If you truley do believe that's not offensive, and you meant no harm, find another way of expressing yourself.
BTW, how do you stant on Gay marriage. But before you get you undies in a bunch here's the definition:
joining in wedlock: the joining together in wedlock of two people
union of two things: a close union, blend, or mixture of two things
specific marriage relationship: a married relationship between two people, or a somebody's relationship with his or her spouse
Posted by: No Fear at November 13, 2006 01:52 PM (ZQepB)
56
NoFear,
this is CARLOS speaking to you. stfu asshole. The way you Leftards speak of christians one would think you are the most bigoted people on the planet. Glass houses. If you think we are bigoted, we learned it from the best (you).
this is CARLOS speaking to you. stfu asshole. The way you Leftards speak of christians one would think you are the most bigoted people on the planet. Glass houses. If you think we are bigoted, we learned it from the best (you).
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 13, 2006 02:04 PM (8e/V4)
57
Puddleduck:
Are you ever going to get around to answering me on the "Isn't it ironic?" thread? I am unsure if you're arguing with me, or just being sarcastic.
Are you ever going to get around to answering me on the "Isn't it ironic?" thread? I am unsure if you're arguing with me, or just being sarcastic.
Posted by: davec at November 13, 2006 02:19 PM (QkWqQ)
58
Here's the definition of marriage in the state I live. That would be the law, not my definition, just so you know.
Marriage-a legal union between a man and a woman.
That is what the law says, not me. It also happens to be my definition.
Marriage-a legal union between a man and a woman.
That is what the law says, not me. It also happens to be my definition.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 13, 2006 05:06 PM (8PoNP)
59
I'm liberal and a Christian. Christ was a liberal.
Problem with a Christian being liberal, Carlos?
How well do you know your Christianity?
For someone with Jesusland in their name, it seems they have little understanding of just who Jesus was.
I'm liberal and a Christian. Christ was a liberal.
Problem with a Christian being liberal, Carlos?
How well do you know your Christianity?
For someone with Jesusland in their name, it seems they have little understanding of just who Jesus was.
Posted by: Liberal Christian at November 13, 2006 05:31 PM (311gq)
60
for a 'liberal' you seem to have little understanding that 'jesusland' is a derogatory term for the red states.
Posted by: davec at November 13, 2006 05:45 PM (QkWqQ)
Posted by: Liberal Christian at November 13, 2006 05:50 PM (311gq)
62
No, we're showing you to be the hypocrits you are, dumb butt.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 13, 2006 06:08 PM (8PoNP)
63
That makes no sense. But at least it gives you the opportunity to actual say anything of real substance.
Posted by: Liberal Christian at November 13, 2006 06:27 PM (311gq)
64
No, it was a label given by Liberals, after the 2004 election:
http://tinyurl.com/5ymka
I however would prefer to live in 'jesusland' than the 'united states of canada' and not everyone is ashamed of it either.
http://tinyurl.com/5ymka
I however would prefer to live in 'jesusland' than the 'united states of canada' and not everyone is ashamed of it either.
Posted by: davec at November 13, 2006 08:03 PM (QkWqQ)
65
That makes no sense.
Because you're a dumb ass. But if Jesus was a "Liberal", then God is a conservative. Except Jesus wasn't a Liberal because although he loved sinners, he hated sin-- and Liberals LOVE sin. You glorify it. So no, he wasn't a Liberal.
Because you're a dumb ass. But if Jesus was a "Liberal", then God is a conservative. Except Jesus wasn't a Liberal because although he loved sinners, he hated sin-- and Liberals LOVE sin. You glorify it. So no, he wasn't a Liberal.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 14, 2006 12:29 AM (8e/V4)
66
"given these countries ARE our adversaries or enemies, how is the joooish lobby putting Israel's interests before our own? Methinks it's moonbats and Leftards putting our enemies interests before our own (as usual).
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos "
Of course they are "adversaries", because President Moron says they are (or is it just you JC that is saying that - I certainly wouldn't want to put words in President Moron's mouth, since he wouldn't know what to do with them anyway).
We will be invading these countries any day now, since they have been declared as "adversaries".
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos "
Of course they are "adversaries", because President Moron says they are (or is it just you JC that is saying that - I certainly wouldn't want to put words in President Moron's mouth, since he wouldn't know what to do with them anyway).
We will be invading these countries any day now, since they have been declared as "adversaries".
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 14, 2006 07:12 AM (qBTkS)
67
"for a 'liberal' you seem to have little understanding that 'jesusland' is a derogatory term for the red states.
Posted by: davec "
I thought Jesusland was a RW conservative Christian amusement park in Kansas.
I think it's right next to the Creationist Museum of Natural History.
You know - the one that depicts humans fighting with dinosaurs.
You guys seem like even bigger idiots, when you try to defend each other.
Keep up the good work.
Posted by: davec "
I thought Jesusland was a RW conservative Christian amusement park in Kansas.
I think it's right next to the Creationist Museum of Natural History.
You know - the one that depicts humans fighting with dinosaurs.
You guys seem like even bigger idiots, when you try to defend each other.
Keep up the good work.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 14, 2006 07:21 AM (qBTkS)
68
Apparently subtlety flies right over your head, fuddlepuck.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 14, 2006 10:16 AM (8PoNP)
69
piddle,
if you had even a tiny shred of intellectual honesty it might make a difference whether you call us idiots. You don't, so it doesn't. You know exactly what the term "Jesusland" is, who coined it, and why we adopted it.
Your other comments that Iran, et al, is our adversary only because bushitler said it was is also devoid of any honesty (or maybe it's brains).
if you had even a tiny shred of intellectual honesty it might make a difference whether you call us idiots. You don't, so it doesn't. You know exactly what the term "Jesusland" is, who coined it, and why we adopted it.
Your other comments that Iran, et al, is our adversary only because bushitler said it was is also devoid of any honesty (or maybe it's brains).
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 14, 2006 10:16 AM (8e/V4)
70
I'm saying it's a lack of brains, although fuddlepuck is devoid of honesty as well.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 14, 2006 12:01 PM (8PoNP)
71
Hey Puddleduck:
Why don't you get back to me on the "Isn't it Ironic" thread where you claimed that Bill Clinton wasn't impeached?
Yep, Cinton was impeached?
Yet, he was somehow able to finish out his second term.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 08:13 AM
I would have thought that lying about a blowjob would be just as bad, if not worse, than covering up a felony breaking and entering, wouldn't you?
How did he manage to finish his second term, without being tossed out?
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 12:24 PM
It's funny that you don't know that the Senate had to censure him for him to lose office, he was impeached -- impeachment does not mean you're automatically kicked out of office , and your Nixon example is even funnier because he never waited to be censured, he resigned.
How's it feel to have a 'foreigner' tell you how your own countries Government works?
Why don't you get back to me on the "Isn't it Ironic" thread where you claimed that Bill Clinton wasn't impeached?
Yep, Cinton was impeached?
Yet, he was somehow able to finish out his second term.
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 08:13 AM
I would have thought that lying about a blowjob would be just as bad, if not worse, than covering up a felony breaking and entering, wouldn't you?
How did he manage to finish his second term, without being tossed out?
Posted by: PuddleDuck at November 12, 2006 12:24 PM
It's funny that you don't know that the Senate had to censure him for him to lose office, he was impeached -- impeachment does not mean you're automatically kicked out of office , and your Nixon example is even funnier because he never waited to be censured, he resigned.
How's it feel to have a 'foreigner' tell you how your own countries Government works?
Posted by: davec at November 14, 2006 12:21 PM (QkWqQ)
72
How's it feel to have a 'foreigner' tell you how your own countries Government works?
Liberals ARE foreigners for all intents and purposes, always siding with our enemies and adversaries, always threatening to sail to Fwance when they don't get their way.
How's it feel to have a 'foreigner' tell you how your own countries Government works?
Liberals ARE foreigners for all intents and purposes, always siding with our enemies and adversaries, always threatening to sail to Fwance when they don't get their way.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 14, 2006 12:43 PM (8e/V4)
73kb generated in CPU 0.0237, elapsed 0.0434 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0258 seconds, 227 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.0258 seconds, 227 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
