February 01, 2006
Posted by: Rusty at
04:59 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Cindy at February 01, 2006 05:53 PM (Fnux+)
Posted by: hondo at February 01, 2006 06:02 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: Rusty at February 01, 2006 06:26 PM (JQjhA)
Posted by: Brad at February 01, 2006 06:36 PM (3OPZt)
Posted by: hondo at February 01, 2006 06:37 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: john ryan at February 01, 2006 06:58 PM (TcoRJ)
Posted by: Graeme at February 01, 2006 07:30 PM (WtwuU)
You do realize if your going to try and impress people or make some kind of point with numbers - well, er - your actually going to have to show the numbers. I know - its the lil' things in life that are annoying.
Do you realize how dumb you just came off? No? Ok.
You like Brokeback Mountain - fine - buy the DVD.
If your trying to say there is a hugh market throughout Mainstream America for gay love movies ... say it. You rally behind the strangest things - that's for sure.
Posted by: hondo at February 01, 2006 07:50 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 01, 2006 09:38 PM (rUyw4)
Theatrical box office GROSS is about $50 million or so. First weekend studio keeps 75%; after that only 50% of the gross. So revenues are northwards of $25 million or so. Last time I looked, $44 million is a lot more than $25 million.
MOST indie films lose money. Ultra cheapos like Donnie Darko or Blair Witch with viral marketing (read: nobody spends money for marketing) make money, but not as much as the HUGELY expensive blockbusters that rake in tons. Spider-Man for example probably grossed World Wide a BILLION. Net was considerably less but having Spider-Man made Sony's year; not having a Spider-Man movie made them tank.
Let's get real here for a minute. Getting ANY film out the door, finished, and marketing it so people know it's playing and they should go see it is going to cost you around the neighborhood of $50 million at minimum.
If you are talking $50 million per film, to me that's a mass market product. Hollywood is stupid. They keep making films people don't want to see instead of trying to make the best films they can that people DO want to see.
Nobody wants to see Brad Pitt, PERIOD. That guy bugs (women in Germany apparently love him, but they love Hasselhof so go figure). Much less do we need to see him gay.
Posted by: Jim Rockford at February 01, 2006 10:59 PM (4878o)
Posted by: hondo at February 02, 2006 03:02 AM (3aakz)
Jolie is a skank. Yeah, she's pretty, but so is the belladonna flower.
Posted by: Oyster at February 02, 2006 06:54 AM (YudAC)
you have a Hot Lesbo and an Ugly Lesbo if it is a
good gay or bad gay. About 90% of the gay women fall
into this category for me.
Posted by: Butch at February 02, 2006 05:00 PM (Gqhi9)
34 queries taking 0.0282 seconds, 168 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.