February 02, 2007
That phrasing suggests that they're not certain. The US was also (because of global warming) slated to have 17 of the worst hurricanes you've ever seen in history in 2006. And by "inevitably," I meant "not at all." See how that works?
The language is such because these hundreds of European "scientists" will be needing an out when the oceans don't cover the Emipre State building in three years.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
07:41 AM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
Mars Is Warming, NASA Scientists Report
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_ice-age_031208.htmlPosted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 10:53 AM (8e/V4)
And don't tell me the "Progressive, Reality-based community" is scared. Middle-eastern terrorists with nuclear bombs don't scare them, so how in the hell could a little two or three degree rise in temperature have any effect at all on such brave people?
Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 11:10 AM (LFjVi)
Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at February 02, 2007 11:30 AM (oC8nQ)
Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 11:46 AM (LFjVi)
Posted by: tbone at February 02, 2007 01:02 PM (HGqHt)
Naturally I'm talking about those obsesssed with terrorism.
Posted by: Gleep! at February 02, 2007 01:51 PM (Zlbra)
Look, look, up at the sky! Do you see that? And that? The sky, the sky, it’s on fire! It’s burning, and can you see how it’s spreading? Look over there – those -- over there, they look like clouds, but if you look closely, they’re not, they’re on fire! More and more of the sky is changing into fire! Everyone is looking up, and they see the same thing! It’s on fire, it’s burning, and it’s going to kill us all! I can feel the heat, it’s getting hotter and hotter, and we’re all going to die...Ohh, my God, we’re all going to die!
The key problem for global warming theories is that the sea level has not risen much in the last 150 years. A small rise may have occurred, but this may be attributable to the “tail end†of the last ice age. If sea level rises much more, we may be able to ascertain what, exactly, is going on. If sea level declines, then theories of human-caused global warming will probably be relegated to the dust-bin of history.
If a long trend of global warming is occurring, there are two ways it could be related to humans. First, humans might be causing the warming. Second, global warming might be causing the humans. That is, most land mass is in the Northern hemisphere, where warming would increase and improve arable land, growing seasons, crop yields, and available water supplies. We know that global warming was beneficial to humans when the last ice age began retreating, but we do not know if these benefits have stopped. World population is increasing, but GDP per capita is also increasing rapidly, which probably causes more energy use per person. In this way, global warming could CAUSE the CO2 in the atmosphere to rise, instead of CO2 causing global warming. CO2 is not the most important greenhouse gas– --water vapor is. CO2 levels may or may not be causing global warming, and global warming may have stopped in 1998.
The entire warming debate is based upon conjecture until any sea level changes can be clearly attributed to human activity. Science has not yet clarified this key issue.
Posted by: DemocracyRules at February 02, 2007 02:01 PM (th0SY)
The greatest contributor to death by famine is war, not weather. Deal with it.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 02:16 PM (8e/V4)
What global warming? This is the coldest winter I remember in quite some time. Get over it! Your fear mongering does not scare me into giving all my wealth to some 3rd World dictator to see if he can use it better than me. Or to some bureaucrat at the UN, so that the money can sponcer third World armies running brothels and raping children in the places they are supposed to protect.
Or transferring more of my taxes so that "progressive idiots" can spew more anti-Americanism, anti-republic, anti-Christian, anti-everything that is good drivel. I'm fucking sick of it. Get my drift, worm!
Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 02:19 PM (LFjVi)
Terrorist nukes don't scare the average Lefty because unless they live NY city or L.A. their odds of dying are minimal. See, they're so logical! To the average Lefty it's all about him. So caring.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 02:24 PM (8e/V4)
unless China and India sign onto Kyoto, that treaty will cause MORE pollution, not less. Our industries will naturally gravitate to countries with less pollution controls because it's cheaper to do business there. This means less jobs (for us) and more pollution for the planet.
I beg of you, please consider this for a moment. Take a break from the leftwing talking points and partisan hackery. If we can get China and India onboard, then we'll talk. But until then, Kyoto would be a disaster for the West and for the world at large. It's so obvious.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 02:37 PM (8e/V4)
Hahaha! That scared the shit out of all the "progressive community".
GLACIER MELT! SEA LEVEL RISE! BLAH! BLAH! BLAH!
The netroots community are shitting their pants now! You nutroot liberals need to grow a set of balls and quit being such a bunch of sissies. Cowboy up, pansies!
Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 03:18 PM (LFjVi)
Posted by: Gleep! at February 02, 2007 04:39 PM (Zlbra)
I've noticed a pattern in this ongoing debate about global warming whereby a warm summer is more evidence of global warming, but a colder than usual winter can be dismissed as not probative to the contrary. Hmmm, interesting. Anybody else notice that? Just like a severe hurricane season is proof of global warming, but a season without any hurricanes at all isn't probative to the contrary. Talk about "inconvenient truths".
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 05:01 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 02, 2007 06:10 PM (ERHpA)
Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 06:13 PM (LFjVi)
it's that kind of intellectually dishonesty which speaks volumes to me about their claims. Counter arguments don't faze them and they don't even try to respond on the merits. They'll attack the messenger 24/7 though. That's science? They wouldn't be so intellectually dishonest if truth was on their side.
Also, the fact that they would sign up for Kyoto even knowing how damaging it would be to the environment tells me this is pure ideology,and not about the environment. It's just more of the same self-loathing crap we've come to expect from the Left over the years.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 07:44 PM (8e/V4)
Frankly, I hate all this pollution, myself, and common sense tells me that fouling the air and water with pollutants is not good. But these stupid income redistributing schemes that the liberals are coming up with have less to do with pollution than they have to do with ideology, and they know it. They are just using scare tactics to try to get us to commit national suicide. What they seek to accomplish, other than the collapse of the West is beyond me. Hell, I don't even think they know. They just want to destroy.
Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 09:01 PM (LFjVi)
Posted by: Phillep at February 02, 2007 10:16 PM (syf+x)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 02, 2007 11:34 PM (ERHpA)
Nice job combining anti-Christian bigotry with a logical faalacy about "Global Warming."
3000 people never died by being stung by wasps while being struck by lightning simultaneously. Wasps and lightning have not declared war on the civilized world, either.
Please tell me what the "continual and measurable rise in temperatures throughout the world" has amounted to.
"Global Warming" feeds terrorism. I guess it was inevitable for a leftoid retard to tie the two together.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 03, 2007 04:45 AM (Dt3sl)
Anthropogenic global warming is a hyped up left-wing farce, and a political platform of the Democrat party.
Facts are facts. There's a reason the reports say "very likely." Its because the contributors know that they are full of sh*t and can't prove anything conclusively. Water IS H20; water is not "very likely" H20.
The report "proves" nothing except for the lengths leftards worldwide will go to to have a religion and meaning in their lives.
Remember when it was, according to the Democrats and mainstream press, "very likely" that Karl Rove was to be indicted? Did that make it true?
There's your answer for the global warming hoax.
Posted by: Good Lt at February 03, 2007 11:23 AM (D0TMh)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 03, 2007 11:46 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: greyrooster at February 03, 2007 01:21 PM (0W1Sk)
seriously, you fail when you apply facts.
Posted by: Jake at February 08, 2007 08:53 PM (AeRA2)
34 queries taking 0.0558 seconds, 180 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.