February 02, 2007

We're All 'Very Likely' to Die!11!! Noooooo!!!1!

Somehow. Sometime. Someway - "very likely" by "global warming."

That phrasing suggests that they're not certain. The US was also (because of global warming) slated to have 17 of the worst hurricanes you've ever seen in history in 2006. And by "inevitably," I meant "not at all." See how that works?

The language is such because these hundreds of European "scientists" will be needing an out when the oceans don't cover the Emipre State building in three years.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 07:41 AM | Comments (25) | Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I guess little green men are causing global warming on Mars:

Mars Is Warming, NASA Scientists Report

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_ice-age_031208.html

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 10:53 AM (8e/V4)

2 Hah....hah....hah.....I'm not scared. I've been freezing my butt off all morning, playing in the snow outside, even though I live in the South. I need some Global warming.

And don't tell me the "Progressive, Reality-based community" is scared. Middle-eastern terrorists with nuclear bombs don't scare them, so how in the hell could a little two or three degree rise in temperature have any effect at all on such brave people?

Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 11:10 AM (LFjVi)

3 CNN said this morning that sometime between 100 years from now and, oh, next Tuesday, the oceans will rise somewhere between 7 and 30.8 inches.

Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at February 02, 2007 11:30 AM (oC8nQ)

4 Little Green Men driving gas-guzzling SUV's is who you mean, Carlos. Of course, these little green men are "light green", which means they are evil, in comparison to the "dark green" men who ride buses and trains. See how it works, Carlos.

Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 11:46 AM (LFjVi)

5 Better chances for death by famine than by terrorist. Deal with it.

Posted by: tbone at February 02, 2007 01:02 PM (HGqHt)

6 I am so tired of these niggling, quavering, scared-of-their-own-shadows types I could scream. They see danger lurking around every corner, doom in every new pronouncement . Honestly, it's getting to be like a cult. My fear is that soon, even though a certain amount of danger may legitimately exist, no one will even listen to them anymore...



Naturally I'm talking about those obsesssed with terrorism.

Posted by: Gleep! at February 02, 2007 01:51 PM (Zlbra)

7 GLOBAL WARMING IS BECOMING MORE CONTROVERSIAL, NOT LESS

Look, look, up at the sky! Do you see that? And that? The sky, the sky, it’s on fire! It’s burning, and can you see how it’s spreading?  Look over there – those -- over there, they look like clouds, but if you look closely, they’re not, they’re on fire!  More and more of the sky is changing into fire!  Everyone is looking up, and they see the same thing!  It’s on fire, it’s burning, and it’s going to kill us all!  I can feel the heat, it’s getting hotter and hotter, and we’re all going to die...Ohh, my God, we’re all going to die!

The key problem for global warming theories is that the sea level has not risen much in the last 150 years.  A small rise may have occurred, but this may be attributable to the “tail end” of the last ice age.  If sea level rises much more, we may be able to ascertain what, exactly, is going on.  If sea level declines, then theories of human-caused global warming will probably be relegated to the dust-bin of history.

If a long trend of global warming is occurring, there are two ways it could be related to humans.  First, humans might be causing the warming.  Second, global warming might be causing the humans.  That is, most land mass is in the Northern hemisphere, where warming would increase and improve arable land, growing seasons, crop yields, and available water supplies.  We know that global warming was beneficial to humans when the last ice age began retreating, but we do not know if these benefits have stopped.  World population is increasing, but GDP per capita is also increasing rapidly, which probably causes more energy use per person.  In this way, global warming could CAUSE the CO2 in the atmosphere to rise, instead of CO2 causing global warming.  CO2 is not the most important greenhouse gas– --water vapor is.  CO2 levels may or may not be causing global warming, and global warming may have stopped in 1998.

The entire warming debate is based upon conjecture until any sea level changes can be clearly attributed to human activity. Science has not yet clarified this key issue.


Posted by: DemocracyRules at February 02, 2007 02:01 PM (th0SY)

8 Better chances for death by famine than by terrorist. Deal with it.



The greatest contributor to death by famine is war, not weather.  Deal with it.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 02:16 PM (8e/V4)

9 Screw you, Gleep. I tired of this obsessive fear of "global warming", which has NO effect on me. None, nada, you get it! I've been playing in the SNOW, you dim wit. In the deep South, you idiot!

What global warming? This is the coldest winter I remember in quite some time. Get over it! Your fear mongering does not scare me into giving all my wealth to some 3rd World dictator to see if he can use it better than me. Or to some bureaucrat at the UN, so that the money can sponcer third World armies running brothels and raping children in the places they are supposed to protect.

Or transferring more of my taxes so that "progressive idiots" can spew more anti-Americanism, anti-republic, anti-Christian, anti-everything that is good drivel. I'm fucking sick of it. Get my drift, worm!

Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 02:19 PM (LFjVi)

10 Middle-eastern terrorists with nuclear bombs don't scare them,

Terrorist nukes don't scare the average Lefty because unless they live NY city or L.A. their odds of dying are minimal.  See, they're so logical!  To the average Lefty it's all about him.  So caring.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 02:24 PM (8e/V4)

11 Leftbots,

unless China and India sign onto Kyoto, that treaty will cause MORE pollution, not less.  Our industries will naturally gravitate to countries with less pollution controls because it's cheaper to do business there.  This means less jobs (for us) and more pollution for the planet. 

I beg of you, please consider this for a moment.  Take a break from the leftwing talking points and partisan hackery.   If we can get China and India onboard, then we'll talk.  But until then, Kyoto would be a disaster for the West and for the world at large.   It's so obvious.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 02:37 PM (8e/V4)

12 GLOBAL WARMING! GLOBAL WARMING! GLOBAL WARMING!


Hahaha! That scared the shit out of all the "progressive community".
 
 
GLACIER MELT! SEA LEVEL RISE! BLAH! BLAH! BLAH!


The netroots community are shitting their pants now! You nutroot liberals need to grow a set of balls and quit being such a bunch of sissies. Cowboy up, pansies!

Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 03:18 PM (LFjVi)

13 Uh, no insult intended to your obvious Christian leanings and you might be right altogether templar, but at the same token, anyone's chance of dying from an act of terrorism is about as likely as being stung to death by wasps while getting struck by lightning — and yet that's the ongoing fear.  As for you playing in snow in the South, that's nice, but global warming isn't about one year to the next  in one part of the US ... hell I'm in Wisconsin and this winter's been about 20 degrees wwarmer than uusual. That's not global warming. It's about the cumulative effects of a continual and measurable rise in temperatures throughout the world, causing  drastic and long-lasting changes in weather patterns, which ultimately effects food and water supplies, which ultimately effects terrorism  -- starving, thirsty, pissed-off people have nothing to lose you see.

Posted by: Gleep! at February 02, 2007 04:39 PM (Zlbra)

14 ....but global warming isn't about one year to the next  in one part of the US

I've noticed a pattern in this ongoing debate about global warming whereby a warm summer is more evidence of global warming, but a colder than usual winter can be dismissed as not probative to the contrary.  Hmmm, interesting.  Anybody else notice that?   Just like a severe hurricane season is proof of global warming, but a season without any hurricanes at all isn't probative to the contrary.  Talk about "inconvenient truths".

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 05:01 PM (8e/V4)

15 Snow is Pheonix, Mississippi and Malibu. Yea! A sure sign of global warming. That doesn't count. But a polar bear waking up 3 days early is a sign of doom.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 02, 2007 06:10 PM (ERHpA)

16 Damn good point, Carlos. Just like this past hurricare season being one of calmest ever, after the global warming nutjobs predicted an extremely active, more powerful than ever hurricane season. But, just as you say, they can come up with a reason why their predictions are wrong, yet never give the opposition that same chance.

Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 06:13 PM (LFjVi)

17 templar, rooster,

it's that kind of intellectually dishonesty which speaks volumes to me about their claims.  Counter arguments don't faze them and they don't even try to respond on the merits.  They'll attack the messenger 24/7 though.  That's science?  They wouldn't be so intellectually dishonest if truth was on their side. 

Also, the fact that they would sign up for Kyoto even knowing how damaging it would be to the environment tells me this is pure ideology,and not about the environment.  It's just more of the same self-loathing crap we've come to expect from the Left over the years.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 02, 2007 07:44 PM (8e/V4)

18 Hmm....wasn't it just a few hundred years ago that 90% of the scientists agreed that the World was flat, and that Columbus was likely to fall off the edge of the World. My point is that not everything said by the scientists is right, and that nothing that walks on two feet can predict the weather.

Frankly, I hate all this pollution, myself, and common sense tells me that fouling the air and water with pollutants is not good. But these stupid income redistributing schemes that the liberals are coming up with have less to do with pollution than they have to do with ideology, and they know it. They are just using scare tactics to try to get us to commit national suicide. What they seek to accomplish, other than the collapse of the West is beyond me. Hell, I don't even think they know. They just want to destroy.

Posted by: templar knight at February 02, 2007 09:01 PM (LFjVi)

19 Check through the rest of the news. Somoene has orchestrated a lefty media blitz.

Posted by: Phillep at February 02, 2007 10:16 PM (syf+x)

20 When one is a lefturd he must follow the complete agenda. This includes abortion in the last months of pregnancy, black people are disenfranchised, global warming, PETA doesn't kill animals, illegal immigrants should have more oportunities than citizens, US Soldiers are baby killers, Bush invaded Iraq for the oil. 9/11 was an inside job. 99% of muslims are nice caring people who hate the terrorists, 87% of Jews vote democratic, etc: problem is they bring so much bullshit to the table that when they have a real issue no one listens. Most lefturds are  miserable, hateful people and don't know it. They are angry at everything so they come together in their misery and call it the democratic party. This gives them a platform to spread their hate and anger. I would feel sorry for them except for the damage they do.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 02, 2007 11:34 PM (ERHpA)

21 Creep:


Nice job combining anti-Christian bigotry with a logical faalacy about "Global Warming."


3000 people never died by being stung by wasps while being struck by lightning simultaneously. Wasps and lightning have not declared war on the civilized world, either.


Please tell me what the "continual and measurable rise in temperatures throughout the world" has amounted to.


"Global Warming" feeds terrorism. I guess it was inevitable for a leftoid retard to tie the two together.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 03, 2007 04:45 AM (Dt3sl)

22 Warming is caused by the sun, not by people on the Earth. The hole in the ozone is shrinking. There was a mini-ice age from the 14th century to the 20th. Warming wiped out an ancient Chinese civilization eons before industrialization. Volcanoes spew thousands of times as much damaging pollution and CO2 than all of the vehicles and industries produce in the world. The United States is currently experienceing record low temperatures across the entire country. The 2006 hurricane forecasts were perhaps the most inaccurate  predictions ever made, and we were told that "global warming" was causing them. Bull. Sh*t.

Anthropogenic global warming is a hyped up left-wing farce, and a political platform of the Democrat party.

Facts are facts. There's a reason the reports say "very likely." Its because the contributors know that they are full of sh*t and can't prove anything conclusively. Water IS H20; water is not "very likely" H20.

The report "proves" nothing except for the lengths leftards worldwide will go to to have a religion and meaning in their lives.

Remember when it was, according to the Democrats and mainstream press, "very likely" that Karl Rove was to be indicted? Did that make it true?

There's your answer for the global warming hoax.

Posted by: Good Lt at February 03, 2007 11:23 AM (D0TMh)

23 That pretty much sums it up!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 03, 2007 11:46 AM (8e/V4)

24 3000 people killed at the World trade center and that dumbassed Gleep compares it to wasp stings. Yep! Wasps often kill 3000 people in one morning. You ignorant piece of shit.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 03, 2007 01:21 PM (0W1Sk)

25 .... woooooow, did you know that cars kill more than that many people? EVERYDAY?!?!?!

seriously, you fail when you apply facts.

Posted by: Jake at February 08, 2007 08:53 PM (AeRA2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
45kb generated in CPU 0.0251, elapsed 0.0679 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0558 seconds, 180 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.