February 27, 2007

Two al Qaeda Leaders, Dozens More Captured in Iraq

You can run, but you can't hide Abu Ayyub al-Masri! That's two al Qaeda in Iraq "emirs" captured in two days. This follows closely on the heels of the Islamic State of Iraq's (the al Qaeda umbrella group)* return to a spree of hostage beheadings. Payback: it is indeed a bitch.

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Coalition Forces detained 12 suspected terrorists including a suspected Al-Qaeda in Iraq emir during raids Tuesday morning targeting foreign fighter facilitators and the al-Qaeda in Iraq network.

During an operation in Baghdad, Coalition Forces captured a suspected al-Qaeda in Iraq emir and three of his associates. Based on intelligence reports, these suspects are allegedly involved in the production of improvised explosive devices.

Also in Baghdad, Coalition Forces detained two suspected terrorists who have alleged ties to al-Qaeda in Iraq and anti-Coalition Forces activities.
Two suspected terrorists were detained during a raid in Mosul.

Intelligence reports indicate the suspected terrorists have ties with an al-Qaeda terrorist who has coordinated attacks against Iraqi security and U.S. military personnel.

On Monday morning, Coalition Forces detained 15 suspected terrorists including a suspected al-Qaeda in Iraq emir during raids targeting foreign fighter facilitators and the al-Qaeda in Iraq network. During the operation in Baghdad, Coalition Forces captured a suspected al-Qaeda in Iraq emir and one of his associates.

But wait, more al Qaeda linked terrorists were captured in the past two days. Many more. FYI: Bill Roggio says that an "emir" is equivalent to a battalion commander in the U.S. military.

Another suspected terrorist was detained on Tuesday in Fallujah during a raid targeting foreign fighter facilitators.

Coalition Forces detained two suspected terrorists in Tikrit who are believed to have links with terrorists involved in explosives shipments from other countries and facilitating the production of vehicle-borne IEDs.

In Ramadi, Coalition Forces netted a suspected terrorist who is allegedly involved in courier activities for al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq.

On Monday three suspected foreign terrorist facilitators were captured in operations northeast of Samarra, and eight more were captured in a foreign fighter safe house west of Mahmudiyah.

In downtown Ramadi, Coalition Forces captured two suspects in a foreign fighter safe house. Intelligence reports indicated members of the cell were allegedly planning suicide operations against Coalition or Iraqi Forces.

"Coalition Forces are making progress dismantling the foreign fighter and al-Qaeda terrorist networks inside Iraq," said Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, MNF-I spokesperson. "These operations send a message to terrorists that they will be caught and prosecuted for their crimes under the Iraqi justice system."

Source: Compiled from CENTCOM press releases.

Related: Islamic State of Iraq: #1 In Beheading Murders For Allah

*The Islamic State of Iraq is, in fact, a Salafi jihadi umbrella organization of which al Qaeda in Iraq is but one component. I intentionally call them an "al Qaeda umbrella group". Why?

a) It's accurate. There may be differences in command structure between, say, al Qaeda in Iraq and The Army of Ansar al Sunna, but as far as means and goals are concerned, they are the same

b) It really pisses off the head of The Islamic State in Iraq, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, to no end. In fact, a few weeks ago he sent out a press release advising the media not to mix "al Qaeda in Iraq" up with "The Islamic State of Iraq". And isn't the Jawa really about pissing jihadis off?

Posted by: Rusty at 08:49 PM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 571 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Kick Ass!

Posted by: Legrand at February 27, 2007 09:56 PM (/etUv)

2 tick tick tick.....(if you're a terrorist, count the time left until you meet Allah)

Posted by: Richard Romano at February 27, 2007 10:03 PM (/2Xsz)

3 More bad news for the Democrats.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 27, 2007 11:02 PM (ETghS)

4 "And isn't the Jawa really about pissing jihadis off?" 

Amen brotha

Posted by: Howie at February 27, 2007 11:04 PM (YHZAl)

5 I wonder if Jimmy Smit's ever wakes up screaming in the night ... It's creepy ...    But anyway, get them Al-Q devils! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 27, 2007 11:04 PM (2OHpj)

6 And I thought just john kerry didn't ever want anyone in the Armed Forces to ever vote dem again..... that doesn't let the bitches who bailed by hedging their bets that we would lose off the hook. It's not the outside forces that will ever beat the US, it's the internal division. But boy it sure is sweet to hear about milestone markers being passed. Hurray for our cause! Remember to cheer when times are tough too, that's when the troops need it the most. 

Posted by: wb at February 27, 2007 11:46 PM (kXveb)

7 America needs to withdraw from Iraq immediately. "We" need to stop fighting Al qaeda's vanguard elite in Iraq and concentrate all of "our" resources on the inconsequential (and probably long dead,) Bin Loser in the Afghanistan/Pakistan border region.


Every minute spent killing the world's leading terrorists in Iraq is a minute lost that could have been wasted chasing an impotent former symbol far from the theater of real terrorism operations.

What is wrong with you people? We all need to heed the advice of unquestionable moral martyr Osamabinhiding.


Killing Al Qaeda terrorists is a distraction form chasing the chimera of Bin loser.


I see the light now. Why don't you?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 28, 2007 03:14 AM (Dt3sl)

8 I'd bet the fact that the troop surge is working is REALLY pissing off the Dem's.

JB, Nice post  :->

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 28, 2007 09:45 AM (vixLB)

9 I'm tellin ya, it's not the troop surge, it's that the Kurds are comin to town!

Posted by: wb at February 28, 2007 10:04 AM (xWh5E)

10 Wow dont he look surprised

Posted by: sandpiper at February 28, 2007 10:42 AM (4pkrX)

11 Hey Jeff, I'm impressed you didn't even mutate my name on that last post.

To respond:

"America needs to withdraw from Iraq immediately."

False.

"We" need to stop fighting Al qaeda's vanguard elite in Iraq and concentrate all of "our" resources on the inconsequential (and probably long dead,) Bin Loser in the Afghanistan/Pakistan border region."

False, but Bin Laden still deserves death.

"Every minute spent killing the world's leading terrorists in Iraq is a minute lost that could have been wasted chasing an impotent former symbol far from the theater of real terrorism operations."

False.

"What is wrong with you people? We all need to heed the advice of unquestionable moral martyr Osamabinhiding."

I never claimed to be a "moral martyr". Seems you are really reaching on that one.

"Killing Al Qaeda terrorists is a distraction form chasing the chimera of Bin loser."

False.

"I see the light now. Why don't you?"

I'd say you're in the dark & alone on that last one...but I know you're just being sarcastic.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 28, 2007 05:31 PM (ZxuJ4)

12 osamabinhiding                                                                              
 
I think I understand why Jeff made the martyr statement. You know the whole arguement about how the left hides behind spokesmen with "Absolute moral authority" because of one reason or another? As long as you appear to be a lefty, Jeff will be on guard against your loss on 9-11 being used to provide cover in that same way.                                                                                                    
    
 I'm inclined to have the same reaction when people pull out their "card"  http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/hot-air-introducesthe-absolute-moral-authority-card/  and wave it around expecting that to silence opposition.                                                             
 
               
I see it as a cheap tactic, and because it gets abused so much on the left, it is becoming an automatic reflex to discount claims of special pain. Jeff is a fighter, and he expects you to play by the usual leftist tactics, so he reacts accordingly.  Frankly I like that he is a fighter, though at times it can be distracting. Like when you guys fight each other, and everyone else leaves ...                                               
 
 Anyway I'd jump on you the same way if I thought that was what your claims were about, but I didn't hear about it from you first, so I wasn't expecting you'd hide behind it. I hope this makes some sense. Follow the link. it's funny.                                           
                     
 
                                 USA, all the way! 

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 01, 2007 05:05 AM (2OHpj)

13 Hi Michael... Here's the deal:

I don't care if Jeff thinks I'm a lefty. Besides, I think he's too busy trying to insult me to know what my real views are anyway.

My 9/11 experience has NEVER been used to silence anyone. I did feel fit to mention it the other day because I felt I was being lectured about terrorism like I didn't know anything about it, which is false. I HAVE lived through a terrorist attack. That is why I brought it up. It wasn't meant as a "card" to pull. It actually helped the thread, in my opinion, as the other poster had a very valid response after I mentioned it.

If I talked to you condescendingly like you've never been in a car crash and you say you have been through one...does that make you a martyr? Would you be pulling a card or be immune to arguments on the subject? I think not. I have never subscribed to (from your link) "Absolute Moral Authority card: no one can ever question you again, no matter what you say or do!"

That said, my experience is NOT a cheap tactic and talking about it is NOT a cheap tactic. I'm not looking for anyone's sympathy or to be immune or coddled. I do have every right to be offended for being accused of lying though, which is extremely disrespectful and a cheap shot.

Being that Jeff is in attack mode, he will criticize anything and everything I say...which is obvious in all of his responses. I haven't addressed him, but he's on the sidelines taking pot-shots at me while I'm trying to discuss things with other people. Like I said, cheap shots. That is why I choose to ignore him unless he posts in a more civil manner.

If anything, some would be surprised I haven't gone ballistic about this subject considering my past posts about it. The last time was when some jackass came in here claiming Bush blew up the towers, etc. I remember Howie got a kick out of me ripping that guy a new asshole. Responding like that now with Jeff would just bring back all the flaming on these threads...the very thing you don't want.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at March 01, 2007 06:40 PM (ZxuJ4)

14 Osamaisachimera:


Can you back up any of your bullshit? Bellowing "False!" every time you read something you dislike proves nothing but your inability to debate effectively.


Al Qaeda is killing people in Iraq right now. Bin Loser is killing nobody.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at March 01, 2007 09:28 PM (Dt3sl)

15 Actually, saying "false" after your accusations is proving something: That you're wrong about my thoughts, postings and views. You accuse me of a multitude of things on a daily basis which aren't true. Nobody else does....just you. Do you ever wonder why? Like I said on another posting: I challenge you to make a list of issues which would define a person's political status. I will answer or discuss any of them. I have nothing to hide. Otherwise, all of your accusations fall flat on deaf ears.

"Al Qaeda is killing people in Iraq right now."

Never said they weren't.

"Bin Loser is killing nobody."

Well, let's hope not.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at March 01, 2007 10:34 PM (ZxuJ4)

16 Osamibindodging:


You still haven't backed up your demented bellowings of "false!"


Try again, leftard troll.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at March 03, 2007 01:40 AM (Dt3sl)

17 My whole point is that SOME people use the "Absolute Moral Authority Card" in an abusive way, and those of us who end up argueing with them are expected to bow and scrape whenever the card gets shown. This hurts people who DON'T ABUSE thier own genuine losses, or pain. It isn't fair, but that's how it is.   USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 05, 2007 12:49 AM (2OHpj)

18 Jeffbindodging: Again, I repeat my challenge:

I challenge you to make a list of issues which would define a person's political status. I will answer or discuss any of them. I have nothing to hide. Otherwise, all of your accusations fall flat on deaf ears.

I'm not avoiding anything. You are. That is why I can say FALSE to anything you say about me because you do not possess the facts, plain and simple. How is that for backing up my statements? Either answer my challenge to set the record straight, or piss off.

Michael: Absolutely correct. Nothing is worse than those who exploit suffering.

Posted by: osamabinthere at March 05, 2007 04:24 AM (ZxuJ4)

19 Osamatroll:


This thread isn'y about your moonbattery. It's about killing terroprists in Iraq.


Every statement you made about Iraq was false. Stupid hypocrite.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at March 05, 2007 11:15 PM (Dt3sl)

20 Jeff, you're being a wuss. You are afraid to take the challenge because you know you'll be proven wrong.

"This thread isn'y about your moonbattery. It's about killing terroprists in Iraq."

Well then, maybe you should stick to the topic as well. One your first posting on this thread you stupidly accuse me:

"What is wrong with you people? We all need to heed the advice of unquestionable moral martyr Osamabinhiding."

Back your own moronic drivel up! Oh, you can't. Never mind.

Last but not least:

"Every statement you made about Iraq was false. Stupid hypocrite."

Name one. Just one. Please...I'd love to see what you fabricate. I'm not dodging or hiding from anything. Show me a direct quote about what I'm so wrong about. If you want to debate it based on reality (quoting my views directly) then I'm game. The ball is in your court.

Posted by: osamabinthere at March 06, 2007 02:53 AM (ZxuJ4)

21

Yet another knife brought to a gun fight........


Posted by: wb at March 06, 2007 11:05 AM (dFKOS)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
48kb generated in CPU 0.0271, elapsed 0.1379 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.1237 seconds, 176 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.