May 04, 2007
Amen Brotha.A significant number of potential jurors in the Jose Padilla terrorism support case say they aren't sure who is responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, many because they don't trust the news media or U.S. government pronouncements.Ace: If Padilla gets off not because of insufficient evidence but because of OJ Jurors who are determined to acquit because they believe in fantastical conspiracy theroies, the blame can be laid at the feet of John Kerry, Howard Dean, Michael Moore and the rest of the crew pandering to conspiracy schizophrenics."There are too many ifs, too many things going on," one male juror said. "I don't know the whole story."
Posted by: Howie at
07:38 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: George Ramos at May 04, 2007 08:51 AM (TmLg9)
Posted by: iraqwarwrong at May 04, 2007 09:40 AM (8sJDQ)
It's always sad when politics and mental illness interfere with the judicial process. Maybe potential juries should be scanned for herpes and a spine, with high-energy radiation, before they're allowed into court.
This guy is a Muslim and a multiple-convicted criminal, so he's guilty of a number of things, but they may aswell go for the big one - providing material support for terrorists.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at May 04, 2007 10:02 AM (c264P)
No, but their stupidness is not supposed to prevent Padilla from getting a trial.
I'm against the Iraq war too but I want Padilla to get his trial and I don't think the government planned 9/11 because that's ridiculous and retarded. Osama Bin Laden admitted he ordered the 9/11 attacks for Christ sake.
Posted by: George Ramos at May 04, 2007 10:02 AM (TmLg9)
Im hoping against hope that this is at least a plausible explanation.
Posted by: cadetwithchips2 at May 04, 2007 10:04 AM (FPAKD)
Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at May 04, 2007 10:22 AM (2p893)
I'll cite this example in reference to some Iranian minister getting his panties in a bunch and taking his bat home from a dinenr with the US Secretary of State: 'Also I think this guy's a Muslim, probably it's was VERY offensive for him to have to eat with a woman in the first place. Not being sexist, just saying, if we respected there culture we would'nt of tried to put Condi in that position in the first place (we would've been more reality base).'
Funny stuff, but just a joke to highlight the stupidity of some of the Truther crowd.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at May 04, 2007 10:40 AM (c264P)
Oh, and in the unlikely event that you were being serious there (one mustn't rule out all possibilities, no matter how bizarrely improbable): It's Iran - of course he's a fucking Muslim. How to tell? Well, it's really very simple: he's not a) in some dungeon with his nuts wired up to a car battery or b) a headless corspe.
How dare the American people allow a woman to become the US Secretary of State and allow her to go to some third-world shithole as part of her job where she might cause offence to some backward, medieval culture merely by...being. How dare they affront Islam like that! If that doesn't excuse people from advocating and planning their genocide, then I don't know what does...
No wonder you people have got so many problems.
Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at May 04, 2007 10:54 AM (c264P)
Posted by: greyrooster at May 04, 2007 07:37 PM (3we2t)
Posted by: allahakchew at May 06, 2007 10:26 AM (BrndJ)
34 queries taking 0.0715 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
