March 01, 2007
His leigions of braindead bootlickers trying to defend the bombshell revealed this week by something as simple as his own utility bills are even more hilarious to watch.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
09:27 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
In the lap of this non-green, oil industries' collusion administration?
Posted by: greg at March 01, 2007 11:15 AM (dYtyy)
Close enough ?
Posted by: Darth Odie at March 01, 2007 11:19 AM (YHZAl)
haters. The costs that were spent were accrued by the Gores using
green energy, dummy. That costs a lot more that oil, gas, carbons!!</i>
No one cares about the size of the bill; we wonder why he uses SO MANY MORE kilowatts than everyone else.
I still think it's the pot farm in the basement.
Posted by: Radish at March 01, 2007 11:35 AM (yG+tb)
Posted by: geobandy at March 01, 2007 11:43 AM (JZz6U)
""What I’ve seen Gore do very effectively is raising awareness about the issue of climate change and arguing that we should do something about it collectivelly. Not because we liberals are all secretly commies and love to do things collectively but because it is the only fair and effective way to cut aggregate carbon output."
The title of this post should be "The United States is entitled to her extra farts."
Remember that Clinton first and then Bush didn't sign Kyoto because Kyoto didn't establish goals for the entire "collective." Only the "developed" members of the collective were tasked with specific goals. Essentially, they know Kyoto unfairly punishes the rich nations while letting the poor ones still pollute. It is unfair and costly for the developed..err...RICH nations. And yet, those that will argue for implementing Kyoto without full collective effort, now argue against reducing emissions until it is done collectively.
Get some consistency, folks. First, you vilify Bush for not signing Kyoto then essentially use Clinton's and Bush's argument to defend Al Gore. The big difference, though, is that Al Gore wants the world to collectively implement individual Kyoto while excluding himself from the collective. Therein lies the hypocrisy. "
Posted by: bluedog7 at March 01, 2007 01:50 PM (yYph9)
What creates change, Mr. Gore, is leadership by example.
Posted by: catseye at March 01, 2007 02:11 PM (X+AwP)
Posted by: Jester at March 01, 2007 03:18 PM (iwtIO)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 01, 2007 05:55 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 01, 2007 06:24 PM (nGEwN)
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834
Posted by: doriangrey at March 01, 2007 10:04 PM (JeeIJ)
Oh, that's right, you didn't listen to the message.
You are under the impression this is a political issue. Or maybe moral one. It's not. It's about what is happening to the planet.
Posted by: danB at March 02, 2007 01:46 PM (yGL2N)
danB
Where have you been? Countless attacks on the validity of the Alarmist position have been documented here. And the hypocrisy of the messenger is a valid area of concern.
The last person I want to date my sister is a convicted serial rapist, no matter how much he lectures me about how to protect her. He is guilty of what he is lecturing me about, and worse, can't come clean about his double standard.
THIS IS POLITICAL. The hysteria is linked to Socialist organizations. Brand new laws will be forced down our throats, and as usual with socialism, there is always an 'elite' body who are poised to benefit from it. Sometimes the messenger IS the messege. Look at bin Laden. He is a mesenger as well. Do you want to accept HIS logic?
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 02, 2007 08:44 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 04, 2007 10:45 AM (eGb9y)
34 queries taking 0.0698 seconds, 168 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.