1 I am SO stealing this.

2 Only 34 senate Republicans were on record against the vote.
One of the Democrats that you are accusing of being a traitor is Rep Sestak (D-PA). At his retirement from the Navy in 2005 he was a 3 star vice admiral. He had previously commanded a carrier battle group. You should be ashamed of yourself for equating such men to traitors.

3 John Murtha (D), advocate of the slooooooow bleeeeeeeed of our troops and the war, is also former military and from PA. He wants us to lose - therefore, stabbing the troops in the back.

Did you know that Hillary Clinton, nor her former Commander-in-Cheif husband, never served in the military? If she wins the nomination, will you still vote for her? Of course you will, because you don't actually care who served or not, as long as you see it as a means to make a leftwingnut political argument (which you failed at making anyway.)

You are trying to shut down the obvious truth by suggesting that members of the military (Democrats, that is) have absolute moral authority, and that all others (military or non) should shut the hell up.

Fat chance, loser. Get used to it. If America loses Iraq, the Democrats are going to own that defeat. Their actions now have consequences, and shooting verbal spitballs at the war from the rafters ain't gonna cut it anymore.

Welcome to the House majority. Shame you still don't have the Senate or White House.

4 John Ryan...

This 'meaningless vote' gives support for further degradation of support of our Armed Forces in Iraq.

The Demosleaze are already discussing how to undercut the effort via the SLOW BLEED as the Good Lt says.

Good luck spinning out of this one dickhead, I'd take the Good Lt's KNOWLEDGEABLE opinion over yours any day.

how does it feel to be a useful idiot?

5 john lyin,

being a Republican or ex-military doesn't immunize them from criticism.  Benedict Arnold was in the military, remember?  Get a real argument.

6 Darn it Jesusland Carlos!  You stole my comment!  :-)

7 How about instead of bitching and complaining and counting the body bags for your political agenda ticker, you go ask the troops what they need to complete the job and give it to them?

8

John Ryan, PUH-LEEZE!!!

Robert E' Lee, was a great American patriot then a traitor.

Jefferson Davis ... Ditto!

They served thier country loyally, until they didn't. Read some Shelby Foote, and learn about the past to understand the future. An act of treason can be carried out by anyone if they think it warranted.

Did you know, George Washington was a traitor by strict definition? Granted, our nation is born of such treason, and I wholly support the decision of our Founding traitors in thier choice to aspire to something greater than servitude to a foriegn crown.

Lee, and Davis had better motives than merely supporting slavery, but that is in fact, what thier decisions amounted to. They made the wrong choice, they joined the wrong side, and the cause they served was brought to a just ruination.

Our current 'traitors' don't see or don't care about the consequences of thier own decsions. Either way, we can't excuse the decisions, or the effect these decisions are having. These 'leaders' are traitors as surely as Lee, and Davis, and they are on the wrong side of justice besides.

Using Benedict Arnold as an example of treason, is fine, but he isn't the only good example of Americans gone bad.

I've been reading a lot about the last civil war lately ...

Anyone smell smoke?

USA, all the way!

9 Americans gone baaad



of course, you'll never get these war monger closet fags to change their minds, so don't even bother john ryan.

10 <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/comics/fiore/">stupid terrorists</a>

11 stupid html...

12 What an idiot.

13 Who's more stupid, the html, or the person trying to wield it?

14 http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-brits22feb22,1,4511966.story
 
 
good lieutenant
 
In view of the Brits leaving the south in the conditions your own
Washington Near East pals say is a loooosseerrr, you might want to
refrain from using that word in reference to any possible "victory"
for the US in Iraq.

15 Prince Harry joins the fight in Iraq

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6383747.stm

16 There was nothing civil about that war.  In the end, allot of people died who had no stake in the end game. It took a political solution to correct a moral problem, the rest is just added after the fact and perspective.
 
Issues that are set aside to deal with later require more blood, that's what our President has been trying to say, even at times a lone voice. I wish he knew his words don't fall on deaf ears.
 
A great mind decided that his loyalty was to the Common wealth of Virginia, had she gone with the union, Mr Lee would of just as easliy wore blue. As a student of irony, it was noteworthy to pay tribute to the grand daughter of our nations first president. So highly pissed were the victors that Arlington came to be such an honerable place. 
 
I have often thought that President Bush would be remembered like President Lincoln, a decent man in an undecent world. Look how he was treated, I fear the same for our current commander, even before pelosi was third in line.
 
This backstabbing of the troops is a knife in President Bush, people hate him so blindly that the end justifies the means. And yes that does mean being un American. The muzlims are willing to blow up thier children, our leaders are willing to lose generations just to defy the one man who said," no... we are going to do what is right, not what is easy", how is that so different?
 
Many argue states rights, states rights are provided through the doctrine of the constitution. The first part says, all men are created equal, they fucked up when they deviated from that. The rest is just fucked up details.  Yawwnn.
 
 
So what.... so it's the same people who gain and hold power with perverse division, while you argue and name call with email bravado, the divide widens and the darkness grows. Look to our roots as to what unites us, the pursuit of happiness and all those things it includes. Look at the other hand that gains strength by your division and disarming.  ( there's more than 2 hands in this nimrod that's your big hint for the day)
 
 

17

that was a general, garden variety nonfrag non binding nimrod tossed out there not aimed at anyone, unless your name actually  happens to be "Little hunter"...

18 hey shoogie woogie...

Is "Cox" your ISP or just something you like to chew on?  Sorry, couldn't help myself seeing what news rag you like to read and all...SFgate..

19 Get your grammar straightened up, twit. It is the "Democratic"  party, not the "Democrat" Party. It is no wonder that a majority of sane Americans threw out the "Republicans" out on November 7, 2006. Among other things, the sane majority is sick and tired of being associated with a minority of functionally illiterate nitwits.

20
"Democratic"  party, not the "Democrat" Party.

Then why are you called "Democrats", instead of the "Democratics"?

Super hilarious though how you people always fly into a rage about that!  LOL.  It's so dumb.

21 feel free to email that address, its not mine.

22 John Lyin:


Benedict arnold had a much better military record than Rep Sestak.


They're both traitors.

23 Gaylord's Advocate:


Get your grammar straightened up, queer-bait. It is the "Democrat"  party, not the "Democratic" Party.


Learn the difference between a noun and an adjective, shit for brains.

24 Non-binding!!!  What a joke - the ultimate wishy washy limp position. 
If you want to throw in the towel JR (and Dems) then get some balls and clearly say so and ACT on it!
 
Oh, BTW - JR and the dems are NOT traitors - to be a traitor implies actual support for the enemy - they do not have any affinity for radical islam and probably actually loathe it.
 
They are however afraid of it - and fear is a big motivator to these people.  When faced with a violent threat that does not bend to their passive rethoric and faux intellectual babble BS - they will cower and shy away.
In other words, they have no stomach for actual physical confrontation.
Just babble.
 
JR and his ink want a "status quo" return - something that doesn't threaten them or their lifestyle - they want the right to babble and care - but also the distance to actually be quasi-indifferent when necessary.
 
JR and the like don't want war, and are afraid of  a war affecting their lifestyle, goals and dreams.  But what they want doesn't matter to radical islam - they just haven't figured that out yet.

25 Osamabinbendingover wants a non-binding dick in his ass. The one in his mouth ran out of flavor.

26 Homo-obsessive Jeff just can't get enough. You seem to know SO much about gay sex. I wonder...WHY.

27 i admit it. im a fag. i get a hard on for rascist republicans like greyrooster.

















fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap

28 I knew it! Here ya go Jeff...these links might help ya!

http://www.safenebraska.org/Juv%20Anger%20Mgt.html

http://www.gayfriendfinder.com

http://www.thecityofomaha.com/counseling/index.html

http://www.magicyellow.com/category/Psychologists/Omaha_NE.html

29 Osamaisamoron:


Do you support the troops as much as the Democrats do? Are you capable of expressing an honest opinion, or are you still obssesing over me?


Those were rhetorical questions, because we already know the answers. Troll.