June 22, 2007

The CAIR - al Qaeda Connection?

Most around here know of the ties between CAIR and Hamas. You'll recall that CAIR has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case against the leaders of the Hamas money laundering scheme at the Holy Land Foundation.

But what about a CAIR connection to al Qaeda? At the very least, this article from Front Page suggests that the early leaders of CAIR travelled in the same circles as al Qaeda supporters. I don't know if that makes them guilty of anything more than bad taste in friends. Maybe it's a case of the bad hanging out with the worse--and related to them through marriage. I just don't know.

In any event, the connections outlined in the article are disturbing. You'll just have to read the whole thing.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:29 PM | Comments (30) | Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Ban the religion from these shores. Then give its followers the choice, convert or leave.

Posted by: Dick at June 22, 2007 08:29 PM (XpECF)

2 That is one hell of an article. I'm gonna go throw bacon at the local CAIR office. Don't worry, it'll be the cheap stuff. I'm gonna eat the peppered bacon for breakfast tommorow.

Posted by: Rome at June 22, 2007 09:13 PM (/GrlO)

3 Will someone please ban Greyrooster or at least post his IP and/or email addresses so that we can notify his provider and try to shut him down.

It is totally ridiculous that this idiot is allowed to post racist statements here and get away with it. He not only hurts the conservative cause, he hurts America.

Greyrooster says terrible things about black Americans. There are brave Americans with black skin who are fighting in harm's way right now and it is a tragedy that this blog allows a racist fool to get away with atrocious statements. He may be entitled to free speech, but it is not your obligation to give him a platform and facilitate his hate. Please do the right thing and expose him.

Please Dr. Shackleford or Jane, talk your co-bloggers into dealing with this idiot.

Posted by: Conservative Voice at June 22, 2007 10:02 PM (b0FZu)

4 Dear Conservative Voice,


Are you Trent Lott or Hillary Clinton?

Posted by: JihadGene at June 22, 2007 10:38 PM (l8Hl5)

5 Conservative voice my ass. Stupid lefturd. Yea there are brave blacks fighting in our military. There is also ones that murder whites and others for no reason at all. There are ones that are joining the black muslims more and more. There are nappy headed hos' who falsely accuse students at Duke and are not punished. If you feel it's improper to call a bunch of blacks that beat to death people on our streets niggers then you are a stupid nigger. The blacks know who I'm talking about. So fuck you, stupid bitch. Idiot. Your stupid mama is the idiot for having a freak like you. How's that. Now get the hell out of here. Faggot.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 22, 2007 10:59 PM (k0DWG)

6 Get em Rooster. Greyrooster for president.

Posted by: curdog at June 22, 2007 11:01 PM (k0DWG)

7 I'm accepting campaign contributions (from democrats only).

Posted by: greyrooster at June 22, 2007 11:03 PM (k0DWG)

8 What's more, the bastard married a younger woman!!!!
 
Hey, Just kiddin .
I am  checking  in after a long while and just as I guessed, I'm not mainstream America.
Congrats to GR and Michael on happy marriages. Keep your sons away from my girls.
 
Later.

Posted by: Brad at June 22, 2007 11:44 PM (uhwlA)

9
Posted by: Conservative Voice at June 22, 2007 10:02 PM

AMEN BROTHER!!!

greyrooster, there is an episode of South Park where they convince the Klan to join their enemy to make the enemy look bad by association.  You're a fraud.

You know about purebred dogs... all the inbreeding and the resulting retardation and birth defects? Mutts have a broad gene pool that nearly eliminates inbreeding.  Americans are all mutts.  Celebrate the diversity and all the great stories of all or our ancestors and peoples, or choose your inbred purebreds.

Posted by: QC at June 22, 2007 11:48 PM (OeaeS)

10 Hey! My boys are studs.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 22, 2007 11:49 PM (k0DWG)

11 Perhaps the powerful Blogfathers that run this show would be motivated to censor him  (THIS IS NOT A BAD THING) if everytime he posts we divert the entire thread of the comments off to discussing his offensive posts?

Posted by: QC at June 23, 2007 12:05 AM (OeaeS)

12 ....and if that happens, the terrorists have already won.

Posted by: QC at June 23, 2007 12:07 AM (OeaeS)

13

With a 16 year old daughter, what I need is not studs.
I need long hours filled with summer babysitting jobs, chores and no free time.


Looks like the censor thing is still coming up. Don't these guys know this has been tried before?
Your Greyrooster Damn IT!!!


Posted by: Brad at June 23, 2007 12:13 AM (uhwlA)

14 Is he?:

A: A 3 letter Fed, fishing- to infiltrate hate organizations.

B: A jihadi, looking to employ a damning guilt by association that taints the efforts of this site.

C: Vinnie after about 4 vicadin and a half case.

D: All of the above.

Posted by: QC at June 23, 2007 12:14 AM (OeaeS)

15

I wonder if greyrooster is actually Rusty Shackleford.



Damn sockpuppets


Posted by: Tim Mallory at June 23, 2007 12:17 AM (b0FZu)

16

Brad, thank you. When my wife and I finally have a son, he will be a gentleman, and most likely to young to atract your girls   In any case, I do believe that a person should be mature enough to handle marriage before going into it, and as someoen else said, there are people around who are thirty, and not mature enough.


                       USA, all the way!


Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 23, 2007 12:32 AM (2OHpj)

17 On greyrooster ... yes, he is inflamatory. nearly everytime he posts, someone jumps down his throat, and he usually deserves it to at least some degree.  I understand his position, which is essentially 'counter-racism' where he feels he is responding to anti-white bias, and anti-white favoritism.  I do think he hurts his own cause through his choice of expression.  I personally feel it is wrong to ban someone. I also feel we would all benefit if greyrooster would complain about the racism without being racist in the process.  I still come down on the side of not banning anyone. I'd rather we argued, then that we shut down communication like the left does. I'll finish by asking greyrooster to help us all out by showing more tact, and by asking others to honor open discussion, even if we disagree. I leave it to you.                USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at June 23, 2007 12:41 AM (2OHpj)

18

Hey Michael,
Enjoy your posts, we have much in common.


Don't take me too seriously.


Brad


QC: I pretty much take him at face value.


Posted by: Brad at June 23, 2007 12:49 AM (uhwlA)

19 Ahhhh fuck yea. Still the longest commenter on this blog.  If God didn't want you sheared he wouldn't have made you sheep. Dogs yapping at what they can't understand. Cowards running to mama. Mama, mama he said a bad thing. He got my stupid attention. While the greyrooster pours another drink and laughs his ass off. Just leading the sheep, just leading the sheep. Shall I lead them to greener pastures or over a cliff?

Posted by: greyrooster at June 23, 2007 03:07 AM (K55Wn)

20 When has the greyrooster ever lied?

Posted by: greyrooster at June 23, 2007 03:08 AM (K55Wn)

21 QC: You can cross breed all you want. Me. I'm staying white. Black may be beautiful and brown is just grand. But white is the color of the big boss man.    Friggin mongrel wannabe. No true roots. Sounds like commie propaganda lets keep fucking each other until we are all the same color. With the same BRAIN POWER. Perhaps yours would go up. Don't think mine would. You are a candidate for the humain societies put down program.    Mother nature, God, or whoever made man like they are. It's not nice to fuck with mother nature. God either I would suppose. If he wanted man to be a mixed up mess he would have made them that way.   And for your info. All my dogs are purebred. Why feed trash.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 23, 2007 03:33 AM (K55Wn)

22 Fake.

Posted by: QC at June 23, 2007 04:32 AM (OeaeS)

23 greyrooster,

You just keep right on giving em hell buddy. To quote my grandfather Col. Henry Walker USAF 1898 - 1959.

"I may well despise what you have to say but I will fight to the death protecting your right to say even that which I despise".

There is no scoundrel greater than that which would silence the words of another man simply because those words are offensive. There is nothing that can be said for which it is impossible that offense be not taken. The road traveled to subduction of offense leads ever deeper into tyranny with each and every attempt to restrict that speech which be deemed offensive. For each step does enforce upon the next like a jackboot upon the throat a greater and greater evil called censorship and censorship is nothing less than the bastard father of tyranny.

God save me and the United States from those who seek to do the general public a greater good by protecting us from every dastardly offense under the sun. Your kind ministrations,  your good intentions, your well intended protections  are nothing less than the most vile of plagues upon this great nation.

I need not your nanny state, I despise your big brother protection, I hold only loathing and contempt for your arrogant elitist belief  that  the freedoms enunciated in the US Constitution could ever be served or protected by an act that equals violating the very first amendment to that Constitution.

Those calling for greyrooster to be banned or censored don't deserve the right to speak since it is precisely the right to speak that you make your case to destroy. You cannot silence that voice which offends without surrendering your own right to speak.

Nowhere in the US Constitution is there enunciated the right not to be offended. The founding fathers of this great nation knew beyond any shadow of doubt that the first amendment would guarantee a long line of debate controversy and offense. Yet in their great foresight and wisdom knowing full well the result of their decision they chose to make the very first amendment to the Constitution one that they knew would be the foundation of great offense for many generations to come.

So greyrooster makes comments that many find offensive, it is better to be offended by such comments than to be subject to tyranny even the tyranny of the minority or the majority. What good is freedom of speech if you cannot exercise that freedom. I say that any freedom you cannot exercise is a freedom that you do not have.

To those who wish to silence greyrooster I say, be ashamed, be very ashamed, be as ashamed of yourselves as those great men who founded this great republic would be of you. I leave you with these words, quoted from that great patriot Samuel Adams... 

" If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude
greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in
peace. We seek not your council, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick
the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our
countrymen."



http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

Posted by: doriangrey at June 23, 2007 01:03 PM (XvkRd)

24 doriangrey ,


Greyrooster is not entitled to free speech on someone else's property. And Rusty is not obligated to give Greyrooster a platform. Rusty can ban Greyrooster as a free individual himself, unless of course Rusty supports Greyrooster's thoughts.


Are you such a goddamn communist that you think that if a person allows a politician to advertise on this property, the owner of that property is a censor unless anyone who tries to advertise there is allowed to do so?

Posted by: Conservative Voice at June 23, 2007 02:46 PM (b0FZu)

25 Rooster, my my what are you drinking today you old fool. Sigh..... Ok vote to delete, register your opinion blow. 

See now you drag us in and it just makes him feel more validated ignore him ya damn suckers.  I'd delete him now but in the grand pyramid of things I give a shit about and have time for, he's not one. 

I'm more uspet to read the idiot skin head white supremacists like Michael Crook. They won't let the bigot Rooster on their board because he loves america and wants to win the war.  And trust me their board is a lot worse and rooster normally only uses that language whne he's drunk or mad.  The use uit every other word daily.

You hear that Rooster? the last person I heard to use that language was Michael "I hate the Troops Crook" earlier in the week.  See what I mean, you want to be like him?

And those people better hang for what they did hate crime black white or no. Thats why color crimes are a problem.  What happens when the oppress minorty kills the majority. They should hang murderers period black or white.  I'd write about it but them it looks like I'm supporting Crook and Rooster. 

No Rooster is not Dr. Rusty Shackleford. Different IP's always, my god the paranoids around here.

Posted by: Darth Odie at June 23, 2007 02:52 PM (YHZAl)

26 CAIR is funded by some of the same Saudis who (in part) look after the Taliban and al-Qaida in Iraq. CAIR costs them about US$3 million per year. Since Hamas is now in conflict with al-Qaida, CAIR will not be rooting for Hamas very much, except when Hamas provokes Israel, whereupon CAIR will blame Israel. Hamas today is an Iranian proxy army.

Posted by: Vancouver at June 23, 2007 06:15 PM (1GIDl)

27 My motives, my motives. Are just that. My motives. No need for me to explain what and why I do. All I know is that it's working. If I can get one of a hundred to face the obvious truth I am a success. Americans have been brainwashed. And I am not required to change my beliefs (wish are based on what I see) merely because some bitch named Conservative Voice is screwing a black.  Everyone has a brain and an asshole. Things go in and out of these orifices. Lefturd faggots like the bitch Conservative Voice doesn't know which one to use for taking things in. 

Posted by: greyrooster at June 23, 2007 07:14 PM (1p01H)

28 Our new cry shall be OUTLAW ISLAM AND BAN CONSERVATIVE VOICE.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 23, 2007 07:15 PM (1p01H)

29 Conservative Voice,

While I do not know who or what you really are I do know for certain that which you without a doubt are not, and that is a conservative.

The fact that The Jawa Report is under no obligation to provide anyone, greyrooster, myself or even you, with a platform  to speak from does not denigrate  the association of censorship created by those who have expressed the desire to see the creators of offensive speech silenced. 

You who advocate for that most repugnant tyranny of expression  beloved not by any of the children of freedom, liberty or democracy cast and flail about like a frightened child wailing in the dark. No drowning man has ever even in the depths of despair or through the straights of fear fought so vain a battle to conceal their lack of knowledge or their true ideologies.   

The vitriol of your diatribe evidences only a profound lack of understanding of liberty freedom or democracy. Indeed Dr. Shackelford could by action of his own freewill deprive greyrooster of the privilege of exercising his right to free speech in this a private forum.

And in the doing so Dr. Shackelford would be setting fire as it were to the fabric of his very own soul, casting himself adrift from the moorings of ethical behavior and the standards of social conduct that separate conservative practitioners of liberty and representative democracy  from those who embrace the cold as death hands of merciless tyranny called socialism.

Make no mistake regarding this, that though you clearly fail to grasp the significance of the abomination you so rabidly clamor for you cannot equivocate the poison which infects your mind with the motivations of Dr. Shackelford.

Though Dr. Shackelford does not censor what is posted on his site the very nature of his site elucidates incontrovertibly that the positions enunciated in each post represent the views of their authors and not the site which hosts the discussion in which they take place.

Any attempt to suggest that his failure to adopt those tactics espoused by individuals such as yourself, tactics which are the heraldry of intellectual cowardice and  the Magnum opus of that most vile and odious tyranny that is socialism which masquerades as liberalism pretending to be democracy, is nothing less than the rabid snarling of intellectually disingenuous fools spewing forth the putrid  gangrenous vitriol that they have been indoctrinated into believing represents the true spirit of representative democracy.

The Jawa Report is not Dr. Shackelford's living room, nor for that matter is it even his front lawn. Your pathetic allegory comparing it  to a place where signs or posters might be placed in support of political candidates emanates from you like the odor of death illustrating the depths of your depravity and the degree that the disease which infects your mind that is socialism has advanced.  

Unlike Dr. Shackelford's front lawn, where Dr. Shackelford could in all clear conscience place the strictest of limitations upon such discourse as might take place The Jawa Report is in fact a venue set up and maintained by Dr. Shackelford specifically for the purpose of provoking discussion on the important and sometimes not so important events occurring daily.

To engage in the censoring of individuals for the posting of positions unpopular or offensive would be a decent into the foul and festering hell of liberal socialist hypocrisy. While he obviously has the legal right to censor anyone he chooses to, simply having a right is not an obligation to exercise that right.

He also has the right to fill his jacuzzi with the sludge from his septic tank and revel in that vile filth, but I seriously doubt that he is going to do so any time soon and especially not because you first tried to tell him what a wonderful idea doing so would be, and then tried to intimidate him into submitting to your censorship.       






http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834




      

Posted by: doriangrey at June 24, 2007 08:00 PM (XvkRd)

30 Wow! I'm getting through. Ahhh. I'll have another to that.
 
 
Lefturds always attempt to win an agrument with the same "I'm going to cry to mommy". It's a liberal lefturd thing. They have been trying it for years. Sometimes successful sometimes not. Depends on the inter strenght of the powers that be. Conservative Voice is exactlly the same as a hippy loudmouth at a conservative convention. And the punk's goals are the same. These big ole hands of mine will fit around his stinking little neck just fine. Just fine.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 26, 2007 08:11 AM (KtHtq)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
51kb generated in CPU 0.0787, elapsed 1.4682 seconds.
34 queries taking 1.4534 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.