jawa.mee.nu

May 16, 2006

Surviving Beslan Terrorist Sentenced to Die

He wonâ€™t be surviving very long if a â€œmoratorium" on executions is lifted. Nurpashi Kulayev was sentenced to die for his role in the siege of school which ended in the deaths of the rest of the terrorists and 300+ school children and teachers. At the very least he will rot for the rest of his life.

Euronews: The only man charged over the Beslan school siege two years ago has been found guilty and could face the death penalty. Reading out the sentence, the Russian judge said Nurpashi Kulayev had committed murder and attempted murder, taken part in a bandit group, taken hostages and illegally stored and transported weapons.
An official moratorium on the death penalty is in place.
However Deputy Attorney General Nikolai Shepel said he had asked for the highest punishment, the death penalty, but that he would not comment further and would wait for the court to decide.
A total of 330 people were killed when a group of gunmen, including suspected Chechen separatists, took over a school in Beslan on the first day of term. The other hostage-takers were killed in a shoot-out with Russian security forces.

Life the moratorium and place a moratorium on this manâ€™s life ASAP. This is one of the most heinous examples of what Islamic terrorism really means.

Previous Jawa Report posts on the Beslan School siege here, here (video), here and here.

Posted by: Howie at 09:50 AM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.

1 They murdered 300+ children--ON PURPOSE-- but the morally bankrupt Liberals still try to tell us terrorists are just freedom fighters. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 16, 2006 11:00 AM (8e/V4)

2 JC

Actually they won't say or tell us anything - they will however close their eyes, put their hands over their ears, and hum loudly.

Posted by: hondo at May 16, 2006 12:26 PM (SeBrl)

3 well Carlos fortunately the morally bankrupt liberals have not been a majority in Congress for 12 years and have not been in control of the White House for 6+ years. Fortunately icons such as Cindy Sheehan and Ted Kennedy can still be blamed. I am not really sure of what importance any liberal's beliefs or statements are at this point. Are there many people listening to the statements of Jimmy Carter on Chechnya ? Perhaps now one should take a look at where the conservatives stood on the issue of "freedom" for the Chechens. The American Committee for Peace in Chechnya founded in 1999 (pre 9/11) by the right wing Freedom House includes as members such neo conservatives as Richard Perle William Kristol. Peace in Chechnya meant supporting the rebels against Moscow. For a more complete rundown on the members of this pro Chechen group please google American Committee for Peace in Chechnya. I tried to give a hot link but received the dreaded "questionable content" I think that the support for the Chechens by the neoconservatives was not due to admiration but simply because they were fighting Moscow. The United Syayes has seen that often our allies later become foes.

Posted by: john Ryan at May 16, 2006 01:21 PM (TcoRJ)

4 ... or go off on a tangent like our dear friend John above.

Posted by: hondo at May 16, 2006 01:38 PM (SeBrl)

5 I am surprised the Russians allowed one of the terrorists live. Give that terrorist a round to the head.

Posted by: Leatherneck at May 16, 2006 02:44 PM (D2g/j)

6 John Ryan is on to something. The neocons (rightly)
consider Chechnya a Russian "border dispute," more than
an issue of terror,although to Russia it has elements of both. US neocons would rather weaken white Christian Russia just now,and hope to appease a few Moslems. The Soviet,you know, had helped the militant Arab world against the favored state of the neocons. The neocons, though, also supported Muslim Bosniaks against white Christian Serbia,in the 1990s although Serbs had fought the more "anti-Semitic" Croatians. That's gratitude for
ya-never trust a neocon for long--or at all!

Posted by: Ken Hoop at May 16, 2006 03:30 PM (DZbll)

7 >>>And you're blaming the illegals for your problems?

hondo,

actually they do. When they say things like "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" morally bankrupt Leftists are saying terrorists are freedom figthers. Some even call them "minutemen".

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 16, 2006 07:07 PM (8e/V4)

8 john ryan,

I'm pretty sure even the neocons know a terrorist when they see one:

"The U.S. State Department has designated Chechen rebel leader Shamil Basayev as a terrorist threat to America."

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2003/08/mil-030812-rferl-183746.htm

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 16, 2006 07:11 PM (8e/V4)

9 Meanwhile, Russia has bought peace by allying itself with America's enemies and selling them arms.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 17, 2006 05:36 AM (0yYS2)

10 Will he get the the gallows,firing squade or will he get beheaded or will the 9th circus court spare him?

Posted by: sandpiper at May 17, 2006 07:08 AM (oCdmx)

11 JC....

State Department and neocons have not agreed on key policy
throughout most of the Iraq War era.

Posted by: Ken Hoop at May 17, 2006 04:21 PM (DZbll)

12 Think we can give Massoui to the Russians?

As for immigration, which this topic drifted into, what we should be doing is paving the way for Europeans who see the writing on the wall, instead of those who do the work AWDFSW* or RAAETDY**.

* Americans won't do for slave wages

** Robots aren't advanced enough to do (yet)

Posted by: MegaTroopX at May 17, 2006 09:28 PM (yT/Rw)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

34kb generated in CPU 0.0128, elapsed 0.0282 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0223 seconds, 167 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

May 16, 2006

Recent Comments