jawa.mee.nu

May 02, 2007

Terrorist Attacks Down All Over World

What a shame.

Radical Islam is having a down year this year, thanks in large part to the presence of our troops stationed on the central terrorism battlefront that the Democrats are trying disgracefully to retreat from.

Just remember that Iraq is an al-Qaeda meat grinder (well, we all know this already.)

Maybe they know they don't have to work as hard to intimidate Democrats in our country and that they'll be cowering in corners begging for retreat with a fraction of the effort they were engaged in with the GOP in control (and I use 'control' loosely.)

Flypaper strategy. Google it.

ht: Newsbusters

Posted by: Good Lt. at 02:21 AM | Comments (20) | Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Signs of wartime success, and US victory is disastrous news for the 'Progressive' Democrats. They are antiwar, because this is not their war, itâ€™s the Republicansâ€™ war,
they hated seeing Americans rally around Bush in times of trouble, and
they will do anything to keep the Republicans from claiming glory in
winning this war. They are also anti-military, because the military is strongly
anti-'Progressivist'.

Progressives are really gradualist Socialists. They are Pro-Islamist, because Socialists have common cause
with Islamists in opposing Republicans, and they want the Islamistsâ€™
help to beat Bush in this global struggle. They are anti-Israel, in order
to be pro-Islamist, Anti-Christian, because it distracts from the
pursuit of higher Socialist Ideals. They love Moral Relativism, because
according to Marx, and dialectical materialism, morality is constantly
in flux, changing, and less important than striving for Socialist
ideals. They equivocation on the Constitution, because the Liberal
Democracy articulated in the Constitution is at odds with Socialist
ideals.

Progressives like Cuba and Venezuela, because they are Socialists. They
are glad that Nicaragua has Ortega back, because he is a Socialist.
They have no dispute with China, they sympathize with North Korea, and
Vietnam, because they are Socialists. They like lots of Mexican
Immigrants, illegal or not, because they want to expand their
Proletariat base. They do not want to help establish Liberal Democracy
in other countries, because they do not like Liberal Democracy.

Progressives hate Bush, because Bush is preventing the â€˜progressionâ€™ towards Socialism. Gradualist Socialism seeks common cause with the Islamists.
Both oppose the Republicans at any cost. It will be no problem to
betray the Islamists later. As Marx indicated, morality is irrelevant,
you must seize control of the state and impose Socialism by any
expedient means. Progressives do not mind telling the electorate one thing and
doing a different thing. When Democrats promised to end the war in
Iraq, they did not mention that they planned to do it by surrendering.

Posted by: DemocracyRules at May 02, 2007 06:30 AM (L/SIz)

2 Republicans? Oh yea, those were the guys who fell in love with their new found powers: Started out cool, then decided they should be like their fellows members, the democrats. Now we have mostly assholes in our Congress and Executive Branches. And when they get done with this mess watch how our taxes rocket skyward as a deep recession takes over. Meanwhile, this mass movement our wise leaders fail to understand continues to gather slaves and energies, all of which intend to come bearing down on us and our friends...if any will stand by us during this "It's all American's fault" time in history. If we want to level the playing field we need to send every legislator to law school, both here and in the Islamic world. Then, and only then, will truly "wise men" be in control. Arrogant bastards are now beyond our gates...and we are the fools who let them in! Shame on us! Now is the time to turn this game around, just before $5 per gallon of gas tries to wake us up! God willing, or is that some Allah phrase I need to learn?

Posted by: RJ at May 02, 2007 06:30 AM (yyxO/)

3 To: RJ
One of the key characteristics of Moral Relativism is what I call, 'centrifugal blaming'. Stand in the middle of the problem, and spin on your left heel, throwing blame in all directions. Does blaming everyone for confused reasons actually solve problems?

Posted by: DemocracyRules at May 02, 2007 06:39 AM (L/SIz)

4 Hey demorules...read my words: "we are the fools who let them in."
This would suggest, unless one is an elitist...like you dear boy, that the average American citizen needs to examine his/her values more closely the next voting cycle. Further, the picture I paint is open to argument; which one can deduce just by the broad brush I use to outline my thoughts. You are so clever in your choice of words, etc. So clever...might you be that lawyer of which I speak? Clever boy. Just maybe you sense my finger is pointed toward you and now we get your response. Try spinning someone else around with your bullshit. Moral Relativism...aren't you so smart! I bet you masturbate with both hands, not at the same time because we both know why, rather going back and forth...self love is what you're all about. Projection hidden in your "centrifugal blaming" is so cute, too. Boring.

Posted by: RJ at May 02, 2007 07:48 AM (yyxO/)

5 Actually terrorist attacks are up all over the world. Nice try right winger.

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/117801700185890.xml&coll=2

Posted by: Gordon Hunter at May 02, 2007 08:16 AM (TmLg9)

6 Whats the matter Gordon Hunter did Good Lt. hurt your feelings with this post?

Posted by: allahakchew at May 02, 2007 09:06 AM (BrndJ)

7 Allahakchew,
Excellent witticism! :-)

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at May 02, 2007 09:14 AM (j97MF)

8 Gordon Hunter,
What matters to me personally is that in the six years since 9/11 tens of thousands more of your Islamists terrorist brethren have been sent to hell than in the sixty years before 9/11. And by golly that's a good thing.
You terrorist scum picked the wrong strongest free nation in history to screw with.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at May 02, 2007 09:20 AM (j97MF)

9 Terrorism may've been reduced temporarily, and let's make no mistake - that's a great thing indeed, but it'll always happen and have the potential to happen as long as there is Islam. The two are synonymous. Luckily, practically nobody - at least nobody whose opinion actually matters - buys the ultimate irony that is Islam is the 'religion of peace.' Whoever came up with that little gem must've quite literally dropped his turban when he put it forward, and -get this - people actually took it seriously for a bit.

Posted by: Infidelsalwayswin at May 02, 2007 09:37 AM (KaYIQ)

10 Gordon believes the AP headlines but doesn't bother reading the story--and that's the AP's trick: give a deceitful headline, then put the truth in the story, usually somewhere near the bottom.

Nice try Gordon, you moron left winger.

Posted by: Richard Romano at May 02, 2007 10:06 AM (iD1fP)

11 Here Gordon, just for you:

http://newsbusters.org/node/12431

Read it and weep.

Posted by: Richard Romano at May 02, 2007 10:08 AM (iD1fP)

12 What matters to me personally is that in the six years since 9/11 tens
of thousands more of your Islamists terrorist brethren have been sent
to hell than in the sixty years before 9/11. And by golly that's a good
thing.

Gordon's heoroes all meeting their untimely ends in Iraq. Al Qaeda dying every day in Iraq. That's a beautiful thing for humanity.

And I'm sorry to report to RJ that terrorist attacks are actually down, and that his not wanting this to be true (absurd as that is) doesn't make it so.

Posted by: Good Lt at May 02, 2007 10:18 AM (yMbfY)

13 I tell ya if the MSM wants us to leave Iraq and Afghanistan so that we can spread the terrorist's attacks around in the most fair fashion possible why then don't we, far be it from us to exclude anyone, I find we are a fair and balanced nation:-) Let it be clear to all the wussies of the world the moment that happens they will be begging us to save them from themselves, idiots!

Posted by: Rightmom at May 02, 2007 10:30 AM (0lpqx)

14 You know, I just had a thought: what if the AP wants to "spread the love" of terrorism worldwide? Maybe they don't like it that terrorists have concentrated efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan? They want the socialist ideal to include terrorism--equality and fairness for all!

God bless our troops who are doing the work the left and their comrades refuse to do.

Posted by: Richard Romano at May 02, 2007 10:37 AM (iD1fP)

15 Richard Romano on #11, Good work! I was goint to go there, but you beat me to it

Gordon Hunter on #5 "Nice try" LEFT WINGER! USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at May 02, 2007 10:48 AM (2OHpj)

16 I think the lefturds would be happier if there were more terrorist incidents in such places as New York, California, London, etc., and considering these are lefturd bastions, I say give 'em what they want..

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 02, 2007 11:03 AM (jQsc/)

17 One thing, though.
My heart goes out to the victims of "Gordon Hunter's" terrorist ilk in Iraq and Afghanistan and everywhere else for that matter.
The bastards in the regimes of Syria and Iran keep feulling terrorism without the slightest regard for the lives of the defenceless Iraqi's; and then they turn around and blame the U.S., President Bush and the coalition.

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at May 02, 2007 12:01 PM (j97MF)

18 Hey, Good Lt. where do I say that I don't believe terrorist's attacks are down, or even mention attacks by terrorists, or suggest any of my thoughts apply to the number of terrorist attacks? Further, what don't I want to be true, relating to terrorist's attacks? I was talking about how mismanaged this war in Iraq has been, how the American voting public needs to redress their values prior to voting, how we haven't got the right wake up call to mobilize an effective attitude toward winning, we being the most powerful country on this planet, with supposedly the smartest sons-of-bitches wearing a military uniform. Perhaps our only real problem exists with those who we elected...passive aggressives hiding behind a law degrees (the wise men--do you know the percentage in power?) who think using their tongues and holding up books on law will deter, stop, and neutralize the bad guys...those we have labeled as terrorists, but who I think are a much larger group which I refer to as a mass movement...try barbarians if you like...geeze!
Gosh, who's reading what where, here? Bad Lt, bad. Keep this up and a frag may come your way!

Posted by: RJ at May 02, 2007 01:08 PM (yyxO/)

19 f we want to level the playing field we need to send every legislator
to law school, both here and in the Islamic world. Then, and only
then, will truly "wise men" be in control.

RJ, are you being sarcastic? It's impossible to tell with your rambling.

I oppose any system which seeks to guarantee that the great unwashed masses are shut out of power. As a fancy pantsed lawyer, I know that most lawyers are morons. They may have more 'knowledge' than the average citizen, but their capacity for reason and objectivity is collectively no better than the non-retarded, literate members of the American public. But with lawyers, their arrogance compounds their moronic tendencies. I say it's better to have a system run by humble idiots than one run by self-righteous idiots.

Posted by: wooga at May 02, 2007 01:23 PM (t9sT5)

20 Bad news for the IF IT BLEEDS IT LEADS news media that dont sell their crappy news papers

Posted by: sandpiper at May 02, 2007 03:37 PM (vnSBY)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

43kb generated in CPU 0.0116, elapsed 0.0737 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0681 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

May 02, 2007

Recent Comments