jawa.mee.nu

August 03, 2006

11 Israeli Civilians Killed In 2 Seperate Rocket Attacks

So I wonder what the Hezbullah murderers were aiming at? A military target? Nope. The goal is to kill as many civilians as possible from as far away as possible.

Where is the moral indignation of the UN? France? Russia? The EU? The American left? Hezbullah is deliberately targeting civlians with shrapnel-tipped warheads fired from dozens of miles away. Where is the outrage? Where is the condemnation?

Here's video from July 17 of a rocket attack in Haifa. Note the lack of children used for human sheilds and casualty magnets:

The double-standard becomes more evident each day this continues, which I think is another sub-reason media organizations and Arab governments are frantically trying to get a "ceasefire" implemented to keep Hezbullah from being crushed. They are running out of ways to spin the news in Hezbullah's favor. Don't let yourself be fooled by these Islamist pigs.

And don't forget the anti-Israel narrative when you leave: They're killing civilians! How can you kill civilians! This is an outrage! Disproportionate force! Cease fire!

Cross-posted at Mein Blogovault.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 10:40 AM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 2 kb.

1 12 kids just got blown up in Iraq by an Arab suicide bomber-- intentionally-- where is the outrage?

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at August 03, 2006 10:46 AM (8e/V4)

2 The President of Lebanon has already said he doesn't want Hezbollah driven out, destroyed, disarmed. He says they need Hezbollah to protect them from Israel.

What? Protection from Israel?

This guy is a shill for Syria/Iran. The Cedar Revolution was a failure the day after it happened. They or I should say a large number of Lebanese want Hezbollah around. It just isn't going to be that way. Hezbollah has to disarm? What a joke. They will disarm as Hezbollah and rearm as the peoples islamic arm of Lebanon or some iteration of "Islamic Army".

If Hezbollah was really "for protecting the Lebonese people, they would come out of hiding and fight where civilians are not in harms way.

Posted by: Cmunk at August 03, 2006 11:10 AM (2HM/d)

3 Where is the moral indignation you inquire? Busy putting a positive face and supportive spin onto Hizbollah's heinous acts of war and aggression.

Posted by: Last gasp Larry at August 03, 2006 12:05 PM (gLMre)

4 But, the problem isn't hiz'bollah....... The problem is MEL GIBSON

Posted by: n.a. palm at August 03, 2006 01:04 PM (fbTsJ)

5 Notice too how there aren't a bunch of children running around sporting jihadi headbands, shouting death to [insert any name here] and waving daddy's AK around while they burn Lebanese or Hizballah flags and throw rocks.

Posted by: Oyster at August 03, 2006 01:45 PM (t5wtc)

6 Oyster - yes, I do believe that's the problem. The arabs know how to fight war - without concern for anything but getting the job done in the best manner possible with the resources you have - and the Israelis (and the rest of the west) refuse to acknowledge that it is impossible to do something as insane as make war - the process of killing the citizens of another country and forcefully imposing your will upon them - into a 'civilized' affair.

The anti-concept of "civilized warfare" is one of the great diseases that modern sensitivities have given rise to. Some day it will cease to exist; either because the West will finally get over that particular mental disorder, or because they will have lost to the people who do not have it.

Posted by: MiB at August 03, 2006 02:08 PM (6jwxg)

7 While we're asking "Where is...":
Where are all the armed fighters wearing quasi-military uniforms and ski-masks that they show on their TV station? when they were not fighting Israel they routinely showed Hezbollah members wearing uniforms, and acting like a military -- now they're hiding behind their "meat shields" AKA civilians.

Why isn't the International community asking why Hezbollah is now out of uniform?

Posted by: davec at August 03, 2006 02:15 PM (voZp6)

8 As the iranian pres said today, destroy israel and the problems will all go away.....like we've not heard that before...the Next 'Final Solution'? only if he gets his way. Lets show 'adimmiwadd'his gate to HELL....burn baby burn!!

Posted by: J Anderson at August 03, 2006 03:02 PM (DpKat)

9 Davec: That's a damn good question. I was wondering what was wrong with the pictures. Just couldn't finger it. Where are the ski masks, yellow shirts and camos?

Posted by: Greyrooster at August 03, 2006 05:20 PM (XqAoh)

10 They only wear them on Friday nights. Which yard is going to have a burning crescent moon on will be decided later. What needs to be known now, is who is going to bring the faffel.

Posted by: Leatherneck at August 03, 2006 06:12 PM (D2g/j)

11 Right you are, MiB. We act as if we are on a panty raid. I wonder if Ghenghis Khan was concerned about civilian casualties, or Mahmud of Ghazni, or Muhammad of Ghor, or perhaps Tamerlane acquired the Western ways of warfare before he enjoyed his raisins. My point is that our enemies have no compunction about killing civilians, yet we are supposed to fight with one hand tied behind our backs. Were we to use that standard, we would still be fighting Hitler and Tojo.

Posted by: jesusland joe at August 03, 2006 06:15 PM (rUyw4)

12 Also the country's demanding a proportionate response.
Russia, we haven't forgotten chechnya, i'll bet the chechens would beg to differ.
China, er Tibet guys, maybe the world has forgotten.
France, chirac refused to rule out a nuclear reponse if attacked by terrorists. oh how proportionate.

I get the feeling that those whining for proportionate force are privately wishing the Jews would just lie down and die and then the islamists will leave us all alone.

Note now the Israeli's are just waiting to get out of Lebanon, as long as an international force steps in. So what the hell are the whiners waiting for, they can step in and employ their proportionate force and keep the peace, in the same fashion they were demanding from Israel.

Cut the whining and show us how it should be done.

Posted by: Mathewk at August 03, 2006 08:56 PM (pVHqF)

13 MiB

I disagree bigtime, and fully support "civilized" professional warfare. Fighting a war is never truly "civilized" - its more pragmatic to a specific objective and geared towards actually achieving a clearly defined set of goals and objectives.

You make the statement ... the arabs know how to fight a war ... a sentiment many here might share.

But they don't! They lose! And lose consistantly, painfully, and dramatically! And in the end - winning is everything!

Sure, they are violent, indisriminate, murderous scum capable of horrific acts - but they are still morons!

We have a tendency to confuse their viciousness with skill and commitment. Its not - we need to see it for what it is - and not elevate them to some fearsome indestuctible giant.

Lets not allow our minds to be clouded with irrational fears - fear is the only true weapon they have and works only if we allow ourselves to suscumb to it or react to it irrationally.

Posted by: hondo at August 03, 2006 09:12 PM (MVgHp)

14 Well said. How can those that always lose be good at what they do?

Posted by: Greyrooster at August 04, 2006 04:55 AM (XqAoh)

15 How can those that always lose be good at what they do?

Well, if you're referring to the 'slamoturds, they have become very good at parlaying military defeat into political victory. To lose a battle is to gain international pity, and the more children that die, on both sides, the better, because you can always blame the victim. Muslims are subhuman scum and should be eradicated like the disease they are.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 04, 2006 09:33 AM (v3I+x)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

37kb generated in CPU 0.047, elapsed 0.0563 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0478 seconds, 170 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

August 03, 2006

Recent Comments