February 11, 2007
More of the same is only going to attract more terrorists to Iraq and make our country less safe.
Wait a minute, isn't that our line? Fight them there so you won't have to fight them here. I've been saying that for a while; now it appears that fighting them there somehow endangers us here. Well... that makes sense in a flip-flop, hippie, "We'll confuse them into voting for us," kind of way.
BRILLIANT!
Posted by: Chris Short at
03:14 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
what did you misread that quote? it means that the longer we are in iraq the more they'll want to kill us
"us being Australia." my suggestion, delete this post quietly.
Posted by: Jake at February 11, 2007 05:07 PM (AeRA2)
Gibbs went on to say that Howard was not in a position to be overly critical." (Gibbs is a member of Obama's campaign staff = duh).
Someone needs to remind the Democrats that their unwillingness to fight Islamic terrorism and to only treat it as a law enforcement matter led us directly to September 11, 2001 and that their doing little or nothing did not make the US a bit safe even though during the Clinton administration the US was attacked by Islamic terror groups 9 times.
While we're on the subject of Iraq, maybe Obama might want to read the Clinton Justice Dept. indictment of al Qaeda which mentions in part.
"In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the Government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq," the indictment said.
http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive_Index/Bin_Laden_Atef_Indicted_in_U.S._Federal_Court_for_African_Bombings.html . Clinton mentioned these ties himself in the spring of 1998 in several public speeches, yet did nothing about them.
Posted by: Buzzy at February 11, 2007 05:51 PM (CXz7T)
brave young men and women and $400 billion, only to find ourselves
mired in the middle of a sectarian civil war," he said. "Even
Republicans ... know that more of the same is only going to attract
more terrorists to Iraq and make our country less safe."
Gibbs went on to say that Howard was not in a position to be overly
critical." (Gibbs is a member of Obama's campaign staff = duh).
Someone needs to remind the Democrats that their unwillingness to fight
Islamic terrorism and to only treat it as a law enforcement matter led
us directly to September 11, 2001 and that their doing little or
nothing did not make the US a bit safe even though during the Clinton
administration the US was attacked by Islamic terror groups 9 times.
While we're on the subject of Iraq, maybe Obama might want to read the
Clinton Justice Dept. indictment of al Qaeda which mentions in part.
"In
addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the Government of Iraq
that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on
particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al
Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq," the
indictment said.
http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive_Index/Bin_Laden_Atef_Indicted_in_U.S._Federal_Court_for_African_Bombings.html . Clinton mentioned these ties himself in the spring of 1998 in several public speeches, yet did nothing about them.
you should have written this article then
Posted by: Jake at February 11, 2007 06:06 PM (AeRA2)
"us being Australia." my suggestion, delete this post quietly.
Jake,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Bali_bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq
They wanted to kill you before, they'll want to kill you after. The only way to avoid attack is either to submit, kill all Islamists, or make the Islamists afraid to attack.
A falling camel attracts a thousand knive - Arab proverb.
Withdrawing will only cause the Islamists to attack Australia even more - that has been the arab mode of warfare for thousands of years.
Posted by: wooga at February 12, 2007 01:44 AM (2YapR)
Jake, Islamists between 632, and 732 AD, had conquered a larger empire than any that had ever existed before, and the were invading FRANCE! Arabian penisula to France, and India, in a hundred years! Do you have any idea what a military acheivement that was? Do you have any idea what that meant in those days?
An army of vast size was marching into France, with a large cavalry contingent. Only a few years previous, Islamists had over-run Spain, and there was no reason to believe they would ever stop. They intended to subjugate, and plunder the whole world in Allah's name. Like today. But back then France wasn't the cesspool of leftist/appeaser thinking that it is today.
A man who wasn't even a king, gathered up all the warriors, and farmers, and coopers, and smith's, and shepherds, and marched them to a well chosen position directly in the enemies path. His name was Charles Martel. He was lucky to have gathered a solid core of brave fighters, and who could fight in formation. These bolstered the civilians, and they stood as one force. With spears, wearing furs against the cold, they waited.
In all the contest lasted a week. There was skirmishing, and finally the battle commenced in full. The men with Martel held on, and at the end of the last day, the enemy general was dead, and the Islamists retreated. Martel kept them from eating Europe like an apple, and as a result the western civilzation you find yourself blessed to be a part of, was saved. When you die and go to heaven, it would only be fair if you kissed Martel's ass!
'Frankly' there is only one thing an Islamist will negotiate with. Whoever has the power to kill him! Anyone else is just on the menu. Liberals will supply their own condiments.
We don't need any more excuses to take the fight to them. The world doesn't need another fourteen hundred years of this shit. Islamism, the hate filled ideology that says Muslims must rule all others, needs to be ravaged, gutted, and destroyed for all time, and there is no good reason to wait. Not one!
So basically, you should be picking your side. I'm on Martel's side, and the side of enlightened western civilization. HOW ABOUT YOU JAKE?
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 12, 2007 04:33 AM (2OHpj)
Take a look at the world today. On every continent problems with muslims. That is why I continually scream OUTLAW ISLAM.
Posted by: greyrooster at February 12, 2007 07:32 AM (OSM9f)
Posted by: Howie at February 12, 2007 09:32 AM (YHZAl)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 12, 2007 10:37 AM (6zYAC)
Jakeass looks like an islamopithecine troll posting under a fake Western name. If his IP address isn't hidden, I'm sure it's in a Western country. He sees himself as part of the scruffy koranimal vangaurd of a conquering horde. Scum like him are infesting Europe, Australia and Canada.
Jake is a short form for Jacob--which is Hebrew for supplanter, or substitute. He thinks islamopithecines are going to supplant civilization.
Like most idiots, Jakeass fancies himself as being clever. He probably gets a little girl giggle out of assuming a Hebrew (dirty Jooo,) alias. I'd say his low animal cunning is on a par with a circus trained chimpanzee.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 12, 2007 04:16 PM (Dt3sl)
Western name. If his IP address isn't hidden, I'm sure it's in a
Western country. He sees himself as part of the scruffy koranimal
vangaurd of a conquering horde. Scum like him are infesting Europe,
Australia and Canada.
Jake is a short form for Jacob--which is Hebrew for supplanter, or substitute. He thinks islamopithecines are going to supplant civilization.
Like
most idiots, Jakeass fancies himself as being clever. He probably gets
a little girl giggle out of assuming a Hebrew (dirty Jooo,) alias. I'd
say his low animal cunning is on a par with a circus trained
chimpanzee.
omfg, you nailed it. praise Allah! what will happen to me! i will be banned forever from a pithy republican warmonger website. then i will be unable to spread my lies to those who don't believe them anyway. ook ook!
haha. jews.
no seriously though. Jacob is my NAME.
lol i also have a french last name. Germain. yeah.
Posted by: Jake at February 12, 2007 09:19 PM (AeRA2)
I believe you. The last name in your alias looks as authentic as the first. After all, you've been nothing but honest so far.
There's a reason I used to call you "Fake." You're either a muslim supremacist (is there any other kind,) or a leftist supremacist who thinks his ridiculous ideology will supplant civilization.
If you aren't an islamopithecine, prove it by making some rude and accurate comments about the child molester, prophet pretender Muhammad, and that chunk of black rock the 'pithecines worship. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting, Khoos.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 13, 2007 02:33 PM (Dt3sl)
what are you talking about? can you even point at one lie? or are you just slandering?
i should look up khoos...
mohammed was a muslim prophet. legend has it he bedded hundreds of women many of whom were as young as 12 or 11. mohammed taught peace and understanding to his fellow man, much like jesus christ, the savior of christianity. recently mohammed has had his religion come under fire for the acts of revisionist priests of islam, whom who have been teaching the opposite view of islam. some would say that this parallels the acts of modern day christian minister, whom have been preaching intolerance and hate for their fellow man. jesus is probably pretty ticked about that.
source for islam teachings:
http://www.hti.umich.edu/k/koran/
seriously, what do you think you gain by refusing to learn anything?
Posted by: jorge at February 13, 2007 06:06 PM (AeRA2)
Who do you think you're fooling with your crude taqiya? The idea of a stone aged islamopithecine lecturing a human being is hilarious. Almost as funny as thinking a proto-hominid like you has the cranial capacity to decieve me.
Muhammad was a flea-bitten, cowardly, genocidal, thieving, raping, epileptic, illiterate lunatic who forcibly married a six year old and consumated the "marriage" when she was nine. (Piss be upon him.)
Seriously, what do you think you gain by refusing to learn anything?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 13, 2007 07:55 PM (Dt3sl)
You screwed up and used both aliases over on the "Bullshit Environmenatl Hysteria" thread.
Thanks for proving that you're a taqiyah spouting, islamopithecine piece of troll shit. Idiot.
Back to calling you Fake.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 13, 2007 08:18 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Ilya kresnovitch at February 13, 2007 08:49 PM (AeRA2)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 17, 2007 12:07 AM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: BeorlotG at July 07, 2007 11:10 AM (B39/n)
34 queries taking 0.0726 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.