February 09, 2007

Stem Cells: Embryonic Dangerous, Others Successful

And guess which ones the MSM doesn't seem to want to report on?

One advantage of embryonic stem cells has been that most types of adult stem cells cannot be multiplied outside of the body for very long, while embryonic ones may replicate in the lab indefinitely.

But Atala's new amniotic stem cells grow as fast outside the body as embryonic stem cells (doubling every 36 hours), and he's now been growing the same cell line for two years, with no indication of slowing.

The amniotic sac, teeming with stem cells that can do everything embryonic stem cells can do and more. (Or less, as in causing cancer . . . )

That leaves embryonic stem cells with only one possible advantage – potential.

ht: Insty

Posted by: Good Lt. at 06:47 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Don't confuse me with the truth. I'm  going to kill embryos and there's nothing you can do to stop me.
 
Yours truly,
Nancy Pelosi
Cleaner of the House.

Posted by: n.a. palm at February 09, 2007 09:16 AM (rizcR)

2 This will be shrilly opposed and smeared by the left, because ideology is more important than health or anything else to those doctrinaire vermin.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 09, 2007 02:59 PM (Dt3sl)

3 "because ideology is more important than health or anything else to those doctrinaire vermin."

Hahahahahahahaha!

Jeff, you say the darnedest things. So the blog Jeff. When are we starting? Think about it... you can say whatever crazybullshit you want!

Posted by: John at February 09, 2007 05:25 PM (qiTAx)

4

John, I am gong to back Jeff on the basic idea that if it hits the correct note, the left will hardly consider the wider consquences of any given action. Like a Pavlovian poodle, if the bell rings, it must be a good thing for lefties to swallow.


Before you write this off, I agree that this also happens to people on the right. good ideas that fall somewhere in the middle get shunned, or fought over like a prize to be claimed.


Stem cell research is one of those areas that is polarized to the point that it seems the left just wants to kill babies, and the right just wants sick people to suffer. Please don't claim you never ever fall into the ideology trap?


Take a second, and consider that Jeff, and I both feel the left doesn't care enough about the unborn, and we would like that to change. If you want to extend a hand in good faith, you could try to see unborn children the way we do for a second, and try to understand why we are excited if it looks like more will be saved.


I like Michael J. Fox, but I didn't like what he did. I think he screwed up, and I understand the pressure he was under. To him, it's his life at stake. I've been there kind of.


If we are created with certain unalienable rights, then why would we sign into law, actions which deprive the most helpless of those very same rights? I think Jeff would like to know the answer to that as well, if he can give you a second to answer


Why kill the unborn? Especially if it isn't necessary?


And why does the left seem to avoid that question? I mean really?


USA, al the way!


Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 10, 2007 02:35 AM (2OHpj)

5 Johke:


You want to see America surrender to the terrorists. So do the Dhimmiecrats. You both want to see Bush fail so you can reap political rewards.


You're all beneath contempt. I'm not going to give you any golden showers, so forget about the blog, tard-boy.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 10, 2007 12:48 PM (Dt3sl)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
31kb generated in CPU 0.0469, elapsed 0.1567 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.1286 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.