March 10, 2006
In addition to having questions about the criminal justice and education systems, Judge Stancil stated that he is seriously considering throwing out the plea agreement and sentencing Lafave in accordance with established guidelines, meaning 16.9 years in prison. Being undecided, Stancil postponed Lafave's sentencing for a week to ten days to allow himself more time to think about the case.
As a reminder, Lafave received no jail in adjacent Hillsborough County when she was sentenced for related crimes.
So, the soap opera continues as everyone waits to learn what Judge Stancil will decide.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:24 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Glenmore at March 10, 2006 07:46 AM (zLneW)
Posted by: john ryan at March 10, 2006 08:42 AM (TcoRJ)
Equal treatment under law = women must face the same penalties for crimes that are metted out to men. No exceptions.
Posted by: Good Lt at March 10, 2006 09:38 AM (yT+NK)
The age of consent is a place holder in the abscence of legitimate scientific evaluation of a child's maturity level.
The difference is, most of the readers (male, almost universally) can think back to when they were 14 and, as Glenmore so eloquently put it, think "Where was she when I was 14?!" A girl, however, they have been taught by societal mores to protect and revere as an innocent being - certainly not one mature enough, at that age, to make a decision regarding sex! However, they do not have any problems at all thinking of their 14-year-old selves
It has highlighted that the age of consent is, indeed, an imperfect and unobjective place holder. However, a complete lack of objective psychological standards to measure these children by also exists. Given that, we must enforce the age of consent rule absolutely. This woman should be punished no different than if she was a male teacher having sex with a 14 year old girl, for that reason. In this specific case it is possible that the boy is emotionally stunted and was manipulated by the teacher - and it was also possible that he was just a kid having a good time. But its entirely besides the point. We have no way of evaluating that objectively, right now - so the age of consent law is proper and good.
When we do, perhaps some day that won't be a crime (and, for that matter, perhaps some day a 14 year old girl will get into a similar situation and be judged mature enough to account for her own actions,) and perahps it would still be judged a crime. It depends on the kid involved. But as it stands now this woman is getting off lightly for a dire crime.
Posted by: MiB at March 10, 2006 12:06 PM (VeYWn)
Posted by: Travis 35 at March 10, 2006 01:06 PM (Ntr4E)
Posted by: USA Patriot at March 10, 2006 01:40 PM (p74Yq)
Posted by: Andre at March 12, 2006 06:22 PM (/u+1F)
People like you scare me more than this lady does. Yah what she did was wrong, but you sound like the Taliban to me.
Posted by: Tobin at March 21, 2006 05:45 PM (xJmRM)
34 queries taking 0.0383 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.