May 10, 2007
Let's see:1. He supports Dennis Kucinich's desire for a fresh, Truther-friendly investigation into the "cover up" of 9/11.
2. He goes on Truther radio shows.
3. He suggests, Trutherifically, that the US will phony up a fake attack by Iran on our troops (probably killing Americans, as we may have done on 9/11) in order to have a pretext to bomb the mullahs. So, you know, if Iran actually does fire on American warships, his supporters will know it's actually all a contrivance by the US government. (As was Iran's taking of British hostages, presumably. As was the Khobar Towers bombing, presumably.)But he's not a Truther, oh no, and he's definitely not a conspiracy nutter or John Bircher crank. Nor is he some kind of Dogmatically Dopey Barroom Ideologue.
No, he's a Serious American Candidate with all sorts of Important Principles about Limited Constitutional Government and the Gold Standard and Suchlike Things.
Whatever. If I wanted a fruitcake candidate, I'd've supported Alan Freakin' Keyes in 2000 (or 1996, or 2002, or 2004, or any of the six thousand other times he's run haplessly for public office).
Posted by: Good Lt. at
09:39 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 196 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Randman at May 10, 2007 11:15 AM (Sal3J)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at May 10, 2007 11:20 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: John Galt at May 10, 2007 11:27 AM (A5mvC)
Posted by: pivalleygirl at May 10, 2007 11:33 AM (x/ji8)
Posted by: Max at May 10, 2007 11:34 AM (FyqpZ)
Posted by: Harpazo at May 10, 2007 11:50 AM (5owg9)
Posted by: CountryDude at May 10, 2007 12:47 PM (+fakY)
Posted by: Randman at May 10, 2007 02:28 PM (Sal3J)
Funny thing, is this give Iran license to create incidents.
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at May 11, 2007 08:28 AM (Aj6tl)
34 queries taking 0.0774 seconds, 164 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.