February 09, 2007
Politico: Edwards Bloggers Offend Religious Left
We often hear about the "religious left" from Democrats who desperately try to distance themselves from the militant anti-religious, anti-Christian wing of their base.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Whoda thunk that Edwards' decision to keep two rabid anti-Catholic and anti-Christian nutroots on his payroll is offending this sliver of the Democrat voting block.
Not the dextrosphere, for sure.
Posted by: Good Lt. at
10:58 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Christian Liberals are now just realizing they're invisible to the Left? Not too bright, I guess.
And on occassion when you christian Libs aren't invisible, the secular Left can hardly stand you with all your Jesus talk (even if it's very selective Jesus talk about the poor). They only barely tolerate you because you've sold your faith out to those who hate it the most, all for just a few goodies and handouts. Whores.
And on occassion when you christian Libs aren't invisible, the secular Left can hardly stand you with all your Jesus talk (even if it's very selective Jesus talk about the poor). They only barely tolerate you because you've sold your faith out to those who hate it the most, all for just a few goodies and handouts. Whores.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2007 12:48 PM (8e/V4)
2
"As a constituency, the Christian left isn't taken all that seriously."
That's because those Christian-lite retards reflexively vote Democrat every time. They don't need to be courted any more than Blacks do. (The Dhimmies do court Blacks though, which shows you how stupid they are.) The Democrat party cares about votes, not its constituents. That's something they have in common with the Republican party.
The Republicans do care about national security, which everybody knows the Dhimmiecrats don't. Quite the opposite. When people vote Republican, their candidate usually represents their desire for a strong national security program.
Anybody who thinks the democrats are going to help anything but themselves is fooling himself, or terminally stupid. A shyster like Edwards would probably outlaw christianity if he could.
I could be wrong, but I'm not.
That's because those Christian-lite retards reflexively vote Democrat every time. They don't need to be courted any more than Blacks do. (The Dhimmies do court Blacks though, which shows you how stupid they are.) The Democrat party cares about votes, not its constituents. That's something they have in common with the Republican party.
The Republicans do care about national security, which everybody knows the Dhimmiecrats don't. Quite the opposite. When people vote Republican, their candidate usually represents their desire for a strong national security program.
Anybody who thinks the democrats are going to help anything but themselves is fooling himself, or terminally stupid. A shyster like Edwards would probably outlaw christianity if he could.
I could be wrong, but I'm not.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 09, 2007 02:09 PM (Dt3sl)
3
You guys really are the last people who should be throwing around terms like "nutroots".
Do you even realize that you are far rightwing, and kinda nutty?
Do you even realize that you are far rightwing, and kinda nutty?
Posted by: John at February 09, 2007 04:17 PM (qiTAx)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2007 04:56 PM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 09, 2007 05:00 PM (Dt3sl)
30kb generated in CPU 0.0128, elapsed 0.1052 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0984 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.0984 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
