May 15, 2007

NYC Public Arabic-Language School

(Brooklyn, New York) The focus will be on Arab language and culture at the Khalil Gibran International Academy, a New York City Public School on Dean Street in Brooklyn. In September, 60 students will start sixth-grade. The goal is to teach half of the classes in Arabic.

School official Debbie Almontaser said the school was planned with a multicultural group and the intent is to promote tolerance and bridge-building. So, American taxpayer dollars will fund the teaching of Arab culture in the Arabic language in New York City.

What am I missing here? Are diplomas going to be written in Arabic?

American taxpayer dollars should be used to teach public school students American culture in the English language in New York City, not Arab culture in Arabic. For that matter, we shouldn't be teaching Dutch culture in Flemish nor Philippine culture in Tagalog nor Persian culture in Farsi nor Brazilian culture in Portuguese. And there's a multitude of other cultures and languages that shouldn't be draining public funds when U.S. public schools, in many cases, and New York City public schools, in particular, are doing an odious job of teaching students even the basics in reading, writing and arithmetic. In some school systems, only half of entering students complete the requirements for graduation and, of the ones who graduate, it's dicey as to whether they will be able to read their diplomas.

In my estimation, the public funding of an Arabic school is a dangerous precedent. What's the Department of Education's argument when a different immigrant community wants a public school teaching students in the Albanian language? Or the Somali language? Or Lao? Or Hmong? Or Hindi?

In the latest development from last night, parents of students at the New York City Public School on Dean Street in Brooklyn gathered at an "emergency" meeting to voice their objection to using their facility for an Arabic language school.

For 90 minutes, NYC Education Department officials and Khalil Gibran Principal Debbie Almontaser (pic) said it was a done deal and made the parents feel they were being railroaded by the system.

Said parent Cherry Carter, "

hey're throwing it down our throats."

Now we know the practical definition of multiculturalism. It's the process of someone entering your neighborhood and shoving something unwanted and unpleasant down your throat.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 05:00 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 3 kb.

1 "with a multicultural group and the intent is to promote tolerance and bridge-building"
Cair style tolerance?

Posted by: Kamchatka Bear at May 15, 2007 06:05 PM (gtZwa)

2 Dutch culture should be taught in Friesan!
(Dutch humor here.)

Posted by: Paul Moore at May 15, 2007 06:26 PM (W7+oD)

3 There is no precedent in United States public education for forming an Arabic magnet school... The City of NY has schools that emphasize science, the arts, international relations, etc. But, never a school that concentrates specifically on one culture or language.
 
When the Poles or the Irish or the Italians flooded into our country did the City of NY set up special schools for them? NO... How about the Vietnamese or Chinese? NO!
 
Are they out of their minds? I truly feel sorry for the residents of the community affected who will now give up their local school for political correctness. Over riding this is my feeling that this does no one a favor, not even the Arabic speakers or those of the Arabic culture. Bottom line, the dollar speaks English and lives in the USA.
 
Could the people in the local community flood the registration process and sign their children up for the available classes that do not include Arabic? You know, like science, math and English? Could they make the thing wither on the vine so to speak?

Posted by: Babs at May 15, 2007 06:31 PM (iZZlp)

4 Well, hold on. There are two possibilities. If, as is likely, the school will basically teach dhimmitude, then I'm right there with you.

On the other hand, we will desperately need a reserve of people educated in Arabic and other Middle Eastern languages and cultures over the next 50 years. Teaching this need not be any more problematic than teaching Russian was during the Cold War, when that skill was needed.

Posted by: Jeff Medcalf at May 15, 2007 07:00 PM (7Q2cA)

5 Because in the "thinking" of Leftards the real problem is OUR ignorance/intolerance of Arab culture, not the other way around.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 15, 2007 07:45 PM (8e/V4)

6 Too right, with the wars the USA is fighting at the moment why would it need more arabic speakers?
 
What use would having army and intelligence personel familiar with arabic in Iraq or in fighting Al queda eh?

Posted by: sonic at May 15, 2007 07:55 PM (r1k0Y)

7 We don't have a lack of Arabic speakers in this country, only a lack of Arabic speakers who want to help in the war on terror.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 15, 2007 08:47 PM (8e/V4)

8 Still stuffing this in the kids heads what a lot of poppycock

Posted by: sandpiper at May 16, 2007 11:03 AM (A09bm)

9 I wonder how "Teach Jewish culture in Yiddish" would fly?

Posted by: Phillep at May 16, 2007 11:19 AM (kcmoI)

10 When you're sucking on the oil dick of Saudi Arabia you might as well speak their language.  Wake up.

Posted by: Dave at May 16, 2007 10:44 PM (5zxY/)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
34kb generated in CPU 0.0112, elapsed 0.0753 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0691 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.