February 20, 2007

No Dice, Gitmo Animals

The Democrats are no doubt seething over the decision that prohibits unlawful combatants from having the same habeus corpus rights as American citizens/illegal aliens:

WASHINGTON - Guantanamo Bay detainees may not challenge their detention in U.S. courts, a federal appeals court said Tuesday in a ruling upholding a key provision of a law at the center of President Bush’s anti-terrorism plan.
Wow. The judges actually read the written law and didn't make one up? Bonus!

Dick Durbin wept.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 11:06 PM | Comments (29) | Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I think that the demopcrats are not really seething, they know that they have the support of most Americans and they know that support is growing.

Posted by: JOHN RYAN at February 21, 2007 12:53 AM (TcoRJ)

2 Actually, you're way off.

Thanks for playing.

Posted by: Good Lt at February 21, 2007 01:08 AM (D0TMh)

3 What do you think of the decision, by the way? Why change the subject?

Posted by: Good Lt at February 21, 2007 01:09 AM (D0TMh)

4 I'll tell you what I think Lt. Those poll numbers don't lie. I think Americans think Bush and Congress are a bunch of fuckers about now. I'm wondering what took people so long! Dems, Republicans...no difference to me. I think they're all a bunch of crooks. Either way, back to the subject. I don't see why giving ANYONE a fair trial is such a threat. No matter what country or nationality. I mean, why does a asshole like Saddam deserve a trail and these guys don't? I think the right to a trial should be a human right. It's what separates the men from the animals. I think Americans should practice what they believe in. If someone is there who shouldn't be, then it's quite logical that they should be released. What do you think?

Posted by: osamabinthere at February 21, 2007 03:54 AM (ZxuJ4)

5

Osamabinhidinghisbrain: Which one shouldn't be there? I know who should be there. You.


 


 


 


John Lyin: Quit crying bitch. As soon as I read this post I thought of you crying your sissy ass off over the decision.


Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 05:21 AM (asayR)

6 They're not citizens (in fact, they're not even covered by the Geneva conventions, never were), so they get NOTHING.

Military tribunals are too good for these pieces of garbage.

Plus, the whole non-citizen, trying-to-kill-our-soldiers thing.

So let's recap. They're not citizens. They apprehended on battlefields. They intend to use useful idiots in the American government (Democrats) to use our own system against us. And you want to let them.

At least there's sanity in some of the nation's courts. I think you should read the law on this matter. It doesn't support you, "the polls" or the Democrat position.

Time. To. Deal. With. It.

Posted by: Good Lt at February 21, 2007 08:51 AM (D0TMh)

7 they know that they have the support of most Americans and they know that support is growing.



This is why the Dhimmicrats make such good little drones. They actually believe this shit.

Posted by: Randman at February 21, 2007 09:39 AM (Sal3J)

8 "Guantanamo Bay detainees may not challenge their detention in U.S. courts, a federal appeals court said Tuesday"

Sweeeeeet!
For far tool long have these savages used the freedom, the patience, the tolerance and the humanity of democracies to undermine the latter.

Thanks for the good new Lt. :-)

Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at February 21, 2007 09:45 AM (vixLB)

9 "I think the right to a trial should be a human right. It's what
separates the men from the animals. I think Americans should practice
what they believe in. If someone is there who shouldn't be, then it's
quite logical that they should be released. What do you think?"

Taking the moral high ground against an enemy with absolutely no concept or regard for human rights is suicide.  Since when is it acceptable to fight for the rights of people who want to destroy our society over the safety and security of your fellow citizens?

Posted by: haffee at February 21, 2007 11:07 AM (JQjo+)

10 Well said haffee:
These so called detainees were detained because they were trying to kill our men in uniform. In fact they were trying to kill anyone who disagrees with them. Yet, lefturds in disquise like osamabinhidinghisbrain attempts to apply rights to animals that wish to take the rights from others. Shows his true colors. Knew it the whole time. Absolutely totally devoid of common sense. If a animal goes bad you either lock it up or destroy it. Turn it loose and it will do the same thing again. Merely common sense. 

Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 11:26 AM (smCdV)

11

I think John lyin and others like him said the same thing before the last presidential election. These idiots listen to the liberal news and believe it. Lyin probably worships the two faced Pelosi bitch. She cares so much for the little guy that anyone at her hotel, vinyard or restaurants who attempts to join the union is immediately fired.


Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 11:30 AM (smCdV)

12 Osamabinhidin - or whatever - Saddam got a trial in his own country
with a judge and jury of his peers.  These pigs in Gitmo have no
peers here.  Unless you're considering yourself one....



Take into consideration the Good Lt's words:

They were taken on a battlefield

They were in defiance of the Geneva Conventions

Civilian courts are for civilians

Some have been let go only to be picked up again



The. End.

Posted by: Oyster at February 21, 2007 11:44 AM (FFmKq)

13 I don't see why giving ANYONE a fair trial is such a threat. No matter what country or nationality.
Hussein was transfered to Iraqi control, and was given an Iraqi trial.  If we are to turn over any of the gitmo detainees to their home states, their homes states can give them a trial.

But for now, they are in our custody. Pursuant to the rules of war (Geneva), we are allowed to execute them at any time we want, as they are technically classified as spies (being out of uniform and all).  You don't want us to ignore the Geneva conventions, do you?

We are doing these douchebags a favor.  Giving them an american trial in which to air their grievances against the evil joos... that's a gift I don't want my government extending.

Posted by: wooga at February 21, 2007 01:19 PM (t9sT5)

14

Don't want us to ignore the Geneva Convention. Ha, ha. Good point Wooga. The left only wants it ignored if it suits their agenda.


Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 02:00 PM (smCdV)

15 Gayoroosterbeentrolling:

"Osamabinhidinghisbrain: Which one shouldn't be there? I know who should be there. You."

Oh, hahaha. You're a hoot. Actually, I think anyone who is afraid of a trail proving innocence is un-American. It's the fucking American standard to give a fair trial. If we're going to "spread Democracy" then you gotta practice what you preach, regardless of nationality or location.

Oyster: long time no see. On your points, I don't think it's that black and white. There have already been incidents of people being released from there who NEVER should have been there in the first place. I agree that most likely, the majority of those fuckers belong there...but even the worst of the worst are given trials. Really, what is the threat in that? What do you think is going to happen...they get released and swim over to invade Miami? Come on.

Again to Gayroosterbinfuckinghisson:

"Yet, lefturds in disquise like osamabinhidinghisbrain attempts to apply rights to animals that wish to take the rights from others. Shows his true colors. Knew it the whole time. Absolutely totally devoid of common sense."

Oh yeah, and find one instance where I've said anything about animal rights, you stupid old man. You are a pathetic liar. I hate PETA and I especially hate you. You are the scum of the fucking earth.

Haffe:

"Taking the moral high ground against an enemy with absolutely no concept or regard for human rights is suicide. Since when is it acceptable to fight for the rights of people who want to destroy our society over the safety and security of your fellow citizens?"

It's called not being a hypocrite. You can't try and shove Democracy on other countries but not practice it yourself. End. Of. Story.

Lt: How would you feel if the tables were reverse? What if China had a Gitmo containing United States soldiers? Or Iran?

All of you are operating on the presumption that they are all guilty until proven innocent. Again, this is un-American. You reap what you sow. Mark my words.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 21, 2007 03:02 PM (ZxuJ4)

16 osamabinhidingthethinginhisbutt: Quit lying you Peta loving piece of dog shit. Peta protects the ugly bitch who gave birth to you. You hate me? Of course you do you lying scum. That's the point. Do you think your betters are bothered by lefturd little shits like you? All you've got is a mouth. You don't count punk. You know it. I know it and the world knows it. Just a pitiful little shit at the end of society. Now take your mama, her mattress and get back in the ghetto where you belong. faggot!

Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2007 07:38 PM (MMhDt)

17 It's called not being a hypocrite. You can't try and shove Democracy on
other countries but not practice it yourself. End. Of. Story.


This isn't about shoving Democracy on other countries.  This is about a war against the jihad ideology.  This is about a war against an enemy that does not have an official uniform or belong to a specific race or country.  It doesn't matter what the political structure of your country is.  You don't treat animals like civilized human beings.



Lt: How would you feel if the tables were reverse? What if China had a Gitmo containing United States soldiers? Or Iran?

You can damn well believe that the US soldiers would not be treated well or receive any trial at all.  So, again, like I asked before, why should we be forced to take the moral high ground?  Do you honestly think that if we treated their "holy" soldiers well and gave them fair trials, that they would think better of us?  Do you honestly think that they would spare the next soldier or civilian they kidnap because of our noble attitude? 

They know we're at war.  They are acting like they're at war.  So when are we?

Posted by: haffee at February 21, 2007 07:45 PM (Y0b/E)

18 They're children, haffee. They're not interested in growing up and taking the war seriously. It is and always has been the butt of a joke to them.



Posted by: Good Lt at February 21, 2007 08:41 PM (D0TMh)

19 Give them a drumhead trial just for the sake of due process.  If they pass, give them a full hearing.  If they don't, throw away the key.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 21, 2007 10:45 PM (8e/V4)

20 Never mind.  They already flunked their drumhead trial.  That's why they're at Gitmo.  Carry on.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 21, 2007 10:47 PM (8e/V4)

21 Osamabinfelching:


The terrorists in Club Gitmo have no legal right to habeas corpus, and the federal court upheld the letter of the law.


You obviously want the terrorists to win their war against civilization. Your sophistry doesn't disguise your desire. You are a despicable piece of shit. If I ever met you, I would beat you into a coma.


I'm sure you'll mouth off to the wrong guy sooner or later and get what you deserve.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 21, 2007 11:42 PM (Dt3sl)

22 Gayrooster...I know why you hate PETA. It's because they want to take away your wifey:

http://www.break.com/pictures/feb21gal34.html

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 22, 2007 02:44 PM (ZxuJ4)

23 Lt:

Good points. I still think we should take the higher ground for exactly the point you made: We are not them.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 22, 2007 02:47 PM (ZxuJ4)

24 Cleff Buttholz:

"You obviously want the terrorists to win their war against civilization."

Ah, typical Buttholz response: If you disagree with the way war is being waged then you must be a treasonous terrorist lover. It must be easy for your pathetic mind to exist in a black and white world. Also: I'd love to see you try and take a shot at me. I could beat the corn husks out of you with one hand tied behind my back. You're all talk, bitch. Keep hiding in the corn field where you belong.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 22, 2007 02:53 PM (ZxuJ4)

25 Ah, typical leftard response: If you disagree with any American military action in principle, then you must be a patriotic America lover.


It must be sad for you to deny the existence of right and wrong (left.)


You know where I live. Any day or night, pussy-bite. If you make me angry, i'll find out where you live and pay you a visit.


Go ahead and see if I don't.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 23, 2007 02:24 AM (Dt3sl)

26 "Ah, typical leftard response: If you disagree with any American military action in principle, then you must be a patriotic America lover."

What drivel is this?

"It must be sad for you to deny the existence of right and wrong (left.)"

You mean, right and wrong (you).

"You know where I live. Any day or night, pussy-bite. If you make me angry, i'll find out where you live and pay you a visit."

Hahaha!! I'd love to see you try. I piggyback on tons of wireless networks. If you ever did manage to nab a address, it would be the wrong one. I only use my own IP for work. I can see the headlines now: "Nebraskan Wing-nut attacks local resident" Funny, I remember something else you posted earlier smearing libs for being so violent. Hypocrite.

"Go ahead and see if I don't."

Well golly, I guess I will! I will watch you finger someone's random IP. Mission Accomplished!

Posted by: osamabinthere at February 23, 2007 04:43 AM (ZxuJ4)

27 Osamabinpunked:


Why am I not surprised that a shit-stained coward like you piggybacks his IP address? If your DNC mandated opinions were worth defending, you wouldn't need to hide.


You are an immoral, unprincipled little piece of troll shit. Consider yourself lucky that I will probably never bump into you.


Sniveling little bitch.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 23, 2007 09:54 PM (Dt3sl)

28 Buttholzbinpunked:

"Why am I not surprised that a shit-stained coward like you piggybacks his IP address? If your DNC mandated opinions were worth defending, you wouldn't need to hide."

I piggyback IP's because only a fool would expose his personal information for wing-nut idiots for you to harass. DNC sucks cock, but not more than you.

"You are an immoral, unprincipled little piece of troll shit. Consider yourself lucky that I will probably never bump into you."

True about that. I know how you'd like to "bump" into me. I keep telling you, Jeff. I'm NOT GAY. Save your advances for someone else.

"Sniveling little bitch."

I love the way you sign your posts. It never fails to amuse.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 24, 2007 12:00 AM (JVqe0)

29 jonny16

Posted by: jonny17 at March 04, 2007 08:43 AM (RPsKH)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
47kb generated in CPU 0.2252, elapsed 0.2237 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.2041 seconds, 184 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.