November 15, 2006
As convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff reported to federal prison today, a source close to the investigation surrounding his activities told ABC News that Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was one of the members of Congress Abramoff had allegedly implicated in his cooperation with federal prosecutors.Of course not, Harry's one of Pelosi's anti-corruption warriors now, just like Jack Murtha, William Jefferson, and Alcee Hastings.A spokesperson for Reid, elected yesterday as the Senate Majority Leader, said the senator had done nothing illegal or unethical.
Of course there's also this:
The AP also reported that Abramoff's billing records showed extensive contact with Reid's office over a three-year period in which Reid collected more than $68,000 from Abramoff's firm, partners and clients.Funny how this sort of thing comes out post-election, when it's a Dem in the crosshairs, isn't it?
Update: In the "hoist by his own petard" category, Suitably Flip reminds us of this letter to President Bush, sent in January and still posted on Senator Reid's website, in which the senator says:
There is no reason to wait for indictments or convictions before the American people learn of the role Mr. Abramoff played in the Bush White House. We therefore call on you to make public as soon as possible an accounting of Mr. Abramoff’s personal contacts with Bush Administration officials and the official acts that may have been undertaken at his request.Right back at ya, Harry. Certainly you won't be waiting for an indictment to give the American people a full accounting, will you?
Via Stop the ACLU.
Posted by: Bluto at
02:09 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 269 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: davec at November 15, 2006 03:27 PM (QkWqQ)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 15, 2006 03:37 PM (8e/V4)
Must be that MSM thing again, or maybe the FBI has been taken over by the leftists ? Bluto is your point that the FBI are now all Democrats and that we can't trust them ?
Are there no media outlets anywhere that dare to print the truth ?
Jack Abramoff, first appointed to a position by Ronald Reagan, bilked clients out of perhaps 100 million and all the top Democrat got was 20 grand a year for 3 years ? Come on Bluto he should have gotten more than that: BE FAIR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Abramoff
Posted by: John Ryan at November 15, 2006 03:38 PM (TcoRJ)
Looks like it's not going to work though.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at November 15, 2006 03:45 PM (vBK4C)
As for the story not havibg any legs let's see how far it goes with the "conservative" news outlets. Again i am not sure how much juice you get from a congressman for 20Gs a year. At that rate they would be affordable even for the middle class!
Posted by: John Ryan at November 15, 2006 03:47 PM (TcoRJ)
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 15, 2006 04:02 PM (8PoNP)
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at November 15, 2006 04:04 PM (vBK4C)
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 15, 2006 04:06 PM (8PoNP)
Did anybody hear what the forehead say about Mr. Howard Dean?
Dump him...yup.........DUMP HIM!
Dems are geniuses...no really...I actually had this conversation with someone…
If the Dems dump Dean and Dirty Harry they own the government for the next many many years.
That (Whats his name) Carvil dude is a Bloody Genus…No doubt.
Posted by: Papa R. at November 15, 2006 04:26 PM (R75zM)
Posted by: n.a. palm at November 15, 2006 04:42 PM (2anYm)
Posted by: jan at November 15, 2006 04:53 PM (+oWgl)
Posted by: davec at November 15, 2006 08:06 PM (QkWqQ)
The argument of how much a politician got - 10K or 200K - is not
"nuance". And guilt is not determined by how much or how little. And "Yeah, but..."
is not an argument. The public and MSM outcry has so far drowned
out any chance of looking objectively into who was on Abramoff's
dole. The Democrats set the paramenters and the MSM slid right in
behind following the script. Don't you want to know the
truth? Or are you satisfied that all the right people have been
implicated?
Posted by: Oyster at November 15, 2006 09:11 PM (YudAC)
Posted by: Oyster at November 15, 2006 09:11 PM (YudAC)
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 16, 2006 10:55 AM (8PoNP)
My comment was part of a longer conversation and I guess I just blurted out the punch line.
Sorry for the confusion na., I will go slower this time.
Think of the Dems as two groups, the Masses and the Players.
The masses in the Democratic Party are every little person calling themselves a democrat and they mistakenly run around thinking they have say in the Democratic Party.
The players in the Democratic Party are the ones that DO have a say. They think like there in a very sophisticated game of Survivor and al that rally counts is the last man standling.
Oh sure, the players in the Democratic Party all look for alliances, friends, associates and partners in crime.
BUT
None of these players are in it for the party or group, they are in it for the individual.
So what did I mean, the players in the Democratice Party are just plain smarter than the world thinks. They put together a game plan to win the elections and they are not resting on their laurels.
This comment by the forehead is very revealing and is just an indicator of how much the Dem Players are in it for themselves and show how they think.
The leadership or players in the Democratic Party, that have had the power, are working hard to consolidate and fortify that power again. They are going to look at any avenue they can to achieve that goal. They will look over the political landscape and find any hindrances to achieving power and will capitalized on any opportunity.
As far as Howard dean is concerned, they know he has talked too much. They see that although he may have been somewhat useful in the past he is not going to help in the future. And they know, that because of what he has said and done in the past, some people would not cling on to the democratic moniker just because they don’t like Howard Dean.
And
There is a slim chance he might gain favor with the American people and that cannot happen.
So why do I think the forehead is so bright, well think of Johnny-fair-play, for what it is worth he was a Bloody genius too.
Posted by: Papa R. at November 16, 2006 12:13 PM (R75zM)
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 17, 2006 01:09 AM (R6qo5)
34 queries taking 3.5591 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.