March 28, 2007

Muslim Woman Sues: "Civil Rights Violated" for Judge's Order to Remove Veil

A muslim woman who's case was dismissed because she failed to remove her veil in a Detroit small claims court is suing for "violations of her civil rights". What civil right? The right to "practice her religion".

Her lawyer, Nabih Ayad, is an activist for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committe (ADC). This is the same guy who sued Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld for failure to keep Americans in Lebanon safe during last summer's war. He's also the guy who claimed his Yemeni client "didn't know" who had placed a knife in a book he brought on to an airplane. The list goes on and on.

I'm guessing that the case will be thrown out. No, make that hoping. Detroit News:

Ginnnah Muhammad, 42, of Detroit, says in the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Detroit that Judge Paul Paruk's request to remove her veil _ and his decision to dismiss her case when she didn't _ was unconstitutional based on her First Amendment right to practice her religion.

The claim against Paruk also cites a federal civil rights law in alleging that Muhammad was denied access to the courts because of her religion....

"The way I believe in Islam is that a woman is very virtuous," she said. "We should be covered when we come out. This protects me as well as other people. I believe that God wants me that way."

Because, in the end, it's the woman's fault for showing her nostril that causes men to rape them.

Posted by: Rusty at 05:52 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.

1 The Leftards have taught them well.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 28, 2007 07:03 PM (8e/V4)

2 They may win at the first round of court if they picked a loopy judge.  But ultimately, the rule is that a facially neutral law of general applicability is constitutional, even if it interferes with religious exercise.  Thus Florida can ban animal sacrifices, even though it interferes with the religious exercise of followers of Santeria.  The covered meat will lose.

I'm actually glad they filed this suit, because it will establish some good precedent that allows states to force removal of the veil in courthouses, police stations, DMV, etc.

Posted by: wooga at March 28, 2007 07:30 PM (t9sT5)

3 Send the muslim bitch packing. Why waste money on this trash.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 28, 2007 08:07 PM (LXuMj)

4 Funny you should mention that as years ago a woman tried to pull the same shit, turns out she was not from the middle east and was trying to keep her idenity a secret as she was up on charges of child abuse. Here's a thought.... the laws of the United States of America supercede any and all relgions. If you can't abide by the rules, go live where they enforce your beliefs, it's up to you to assimilate, not up to the USA to accomidate. Pretty freakin' Forest Gump. The enemy is in the weakness of the senate and house and their master, the msm.

Posted by: wb at March 29, 2007 05:00 AM (D4E90)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
31kb generated in CPU 0.0135, elapsed 0.0909 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.084 seconds, 159 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.