March 08, 2007
(Singapore) A 46-year-old businessman and Muslim religious teacher was sentenced to 32 years in prison and 24 strokes of the cane for raping his six daughters from December 2003 until June 2005, when one daughter filed a police report.
Three wives of the man have pleaded guilty to abetting the years-long incestuous rapes of their daughters by their father, whose name is withheld to protect the innocent.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Eugene Lee said the husband told his multiple wives and scores of children that according to the Quran, a father "owned" his children and this extended to having sex with his daughters.Notably, two of the daughters became pregnant and underwent abortions.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
01:22 PM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at March 08, 2007 02:26 PM (vixLB)
I wish I could be the guy to beat his ass with the cane, this is evil.
Posted by: Defector at March 08, 2007 02:56 PM (NcD9R)
maybe the authorities should interview some of the other girls who's fathers attend the local mosque to see if they've also been violated.
Hopefully this isn't one of the countries where the victim gets stoned or put to death.
Posted by: mrclark at March 08, 2007 04:27 PM (QSqIX)
The high levels of social pathology, violence, and terrorism in the Arab world suggest that inbreeding is one of the causes.
Posted by: allahakchew at March 08, 2007 04:31 PM (BrndJ)
Posted by: greyrooster at March 08, 2007 04:38 PM (wTIrf)
I've been communicating with Muslim sources, and it seems many of them don't know thier own religion. Not to surpirising since I know from my experience as a Christian, that many Christians don't know that much either.
I had a good friend of mine disputing the scriptures that detail what happened when Moses came down with the Ten Commandments in hand and found the Golden Calf. Moses's reaction violated my friends understanding of Christianity, and he rejected it. Confronted with the actual passages he said it had to meant metaphorically.
For my own interpretation, I see Moses leading a people in what constituted a time of war and hardship, and having an enemy in thier midst was to much of a danger. Ancient warfare was only different, not more humane.
How this relates to Islam? Well many Muslims don't realize the true legacy within thier own Quran, and the Hadith. Details of Sharia are not well known to many of them, and they rely on these "teachers" for to much of thier understandings. Then they recite it all back without really doing the work to find out for themselves.
Yes, Moses ordered mass executions. It's in the Book. He didn't give blanket permission to conquer the world in Gods name though, and for that we may be glad. There is a difference.
Anyway, this Islamic teacher was over-reaching. So far as I can tell, Islamic law doesn't allow incest, as such. Child marriage ... yes ... but not incest. He invented a perception of it that suited his own selfish lusts, and tried to hide behind his deciet. If anyone wants to correct my grasp of the pertinant 'law' I'll be glad to learn more. Meanwhile this toad of a man appears to be about par with sick bastards found the world over.
I think we have to be honest, and at least realize he actually did twist the religion THIS TIME. No excuse for Jihadist freedom haters though.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 08, 2007 05:53 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 08, 2007 05:54 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: RJ at March 08, 2007 06:08 PM (yyxO/)
Posted by: wooga at March 08, 2007 06:39 PM (t9sT5)
I'm with you on that. Many people teach that Jesus 'turned the other cheek' in some doormat style of pacifism, when it was really a gesture of defiance as if to say..."Yeah? BRING IT BEYOTCH!"
Posted by: mrclark at March 08, 2007 07:58 PM (QSqIX)
Posted by: Al at March 08, 2007 09:04 PM (iFjNf)
Muslim religious teacher, hmm? I'm surprised a mob didn't stone the 6 young girls to death for adultery.
Posted by: slug at March 08, 2007 09:40 PM (tQiUE)
Posted by: busywwolf at March 08, 2007 09:50 PM (In51w)
Posted by: Glenmore at March 08, 2007 11:47 PM (Cdmyy)
Posted by: greyrooster at March 09, 2007 12:26 AM (37Xvs)
Posted by: L at March 09, 2007 11:09 AM (iFXpu)
Posted by: wb at March 09, 2007 08:48 PM (kkUy5)
Posted by: greyrooster at March 09, 2007 09:26 PM (SKtGv)
Posted by: wb at March 09, 2007 10:07 PM (kkUy5)
wb,
no offense, but that is a serious misconception presented chiefly by historcal revisionists, and usually to bolster an anti-white bias. Examination of the Egyptians own art clearly shows that they had people of varying ethnicity, in thier minorities. Because Egypt was an imperial power before the iron age began, they had contact over what was at the time, quite a large region. This included the Hittites, and Africans.
Now as it happens, Moses would have been a Jew, which is the same as a semite. They can get a good tan going, just like any Norwegian, if they lived in a desert long enough. Arabs are the same. Anyway, we know that Moses was able to blend with the dominant ethnicity, and thier ruling class of Egypt at the time, and be accepted as such. If I remember right, this was prior to any Greek or other foriegn rule, so the ruling class would have probably appeared to be semites. This is consistent with images the Egyptians left behind, excepting those which show Gods, or other beings which don't have to be any mortal color.
So John Henry was a bother, and a great American legend, but Moses was a Jew, who passed as an Egyptian. I'm pretty sure a hard facts history teacher would back that up. No fro Bro!
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 10, 2007 02:29 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 10, 2007 02:30 AM (2OHpj)
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834
Posted by: doriangrey at March 10, 2007 11:39 AM (SvEjS)
Wow thats a real sentence 32 years in the slammer and 24 wacks froma ratan cane sure beats sending them to 12 years and giving them parole in 2 years
Posted by: sandpiper at March 11, 2007 12:02 AM (jAP6C)
Posted by: greyrooster at March 11, 2007 01:55 PM (SKtGv)
Posted by: greyrooster at March 11, 2007 01:58 PM (SKtGv)
Hate needs no reason, it is either a fear responce or a greed responce. In either case once the event is triggered it takes intelligence to break the cycle. Without honest intelligent teaching the cycle of hate only grows stronger.
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834
Posted by: doriangrey at March 11, 2007 10:44 PM (SvEjS)
Posted by: greyrooster at March 14, 2007 12:41 PM (W7E9s)
Professor, before the invention of shampoo and conditioner, there were allot of people who had a "fro".
But things were a little darker there than hollywood led us to believe, I thought Charles played a great Moses either way. Now Bill Cosby would of been a good Moses.
I'm not sure what the hell rooster is trying to say, he's still hurtin from that Queen LaTeffa encounter involving uppityness. Prep H rooster, you'll be okay.... maybe she'll call you. MLK day is comin!
Posted by: wb at March 14, 2007 10:54 PM (Cxxtv)
34 queries taking 0.059 seconds, 183 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.