July 18, 2006

More words to make Juan Cole tremble...

While we're on the subject of political obscenities, does anyone remember which political figure shared these sentiments?:

"We're not inflicting pain on these f**kers . . . When people kill us, they should be killed in greater numbers. I believe in killing people who try to hurt you, and I can't believe we're being pushed around by these two-bit pricks."

Posted by: Ragnar at 08:26 AM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Um, Bill Clinton, talking about Samolia?

Posted by: bill at July 18, 2006 08:30 AM (7evkT)

2 Geeeeoooorge Stephanopolis! I just like saying that.

Posted by: Howie at July 18, 2006 09:01 AM (hjI0c)

3 Ummm.. Patton?

Posted by: Richard at July 18, 2006 09:02 AM (7KF8r)

4 Bill Clinton is the correct answer.

Posted by: Michael at July 18, 2006 09:17 AM (Kk+xJ)

5 O, Billy Blow Job,
where are ye now
when we need ya
in the deserts and the ditches
with your rifle(?)in your hand
ready to die, to take your stand
like you said you would, those several years ago....

But Billy BJ,
that was then, and this is NOW,
your words ring hollow and you've moved on
serious that no more, forever, can you be concerned with
THE TRUTH

Posted by: n.a. palm at July 18, 2006 09:38 AM (kHaIu)

6 Bill Clinton always took the high moral ground -- according to Dean.

Posted by: bill at July 18, 2006 09:41 AM (7evkT)

7 High ground? Monica was on her knees. Doesn't sound very high to me.

Posted by: greyrooster at July 18, 2006 10:27 AM (xVlDU)

8 I hope that wasn't Clinton. That's enough to make me start liking the guy.

Posted by: Richard at July 18, 2006 12:17 PM (7KF8r)

9 It was Clinton, as relayed by Stefalluffagus.

Posted by: The All-Seeing Eye at July 18, 2006 01:41 PM (c/4ax)

10 ASE

Wait one second ... he is reputed, alleged, accredited etc. to have said it ... by Georgie boy ... long after the fact ... Georgie boy - his press aide then (and now) whose job was to make clinton "look good".

The is no proof or substantiation that he actually said it ... and under the circumstances - I doubt its true.

Posted by: hondo at July 18, 2006 02:34 PM (MVgHp)

11 Remember also that his wife Hillary "attempted" to join the Marine Corp early in her career - but was turned away by a sexist recuiter.

Remember also she was named after Edmund Hillary - who was a complete unknown (and not knighted) till he climbed Mt Everest - 2 yrs after Hillary was born.

Now - would you bet the farm on the validity of that statement?

This is how those two work.

Posted by: hondo at July 18, 2006 02:41 PM (MVgHp)

12 Too bad Clinton didn't back up his own words with action.

Posted by: Chad Evans at July 18, 2006 02:45 PM (+0rMT)

13 Poor Bill, his wife is a dike, and Monica does not swallow. Can a brother get a break?

Posted by: Leatherneck at July 18, 2006 06:48 PM (D2g/j)

14 That sounds like something W would say!

Posted by: pivalleygirl at July 19, 2006 02:23 AM (BQRI6)

15 That was then (when Al Gore was cutting the military in half to balance the budget, Hillary was instructing the Marines on detail at the WH not to look her directly in the eye, and CinC Clinton lost the codes to the nuclear football, and laughed).

This is now:

Bill Clinton’s first worry is climate change: “It’s the only thing that I believe has the power to fundamentally end the march of civilization as we know it.”

http://timblair.net/ee/index.php/weblog/comments/people_fixated/


Channel this, Hill, Bill, Juan:

Pres. Calvin Coolidge, on the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1926:

"If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final.
If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final.
No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions.
If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people.
Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress.
They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers."

Posted by: a. fremont at July 19, 2006 03:47 PM (CYjYM)

16 More reasons why we dont want liberal wussie wads ythat are wishy washy

Posted by: sandpiper at July 19, 2006 10:56 PM (M9D/B)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
34kb generated in CPU 0.0143, elapsed 0.1082 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0989 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.