February 13, 2007

More Dishonest 'Reporting' From the AP

It's the headline and the lead paragraph that get the message out. The folks at the Associated Press know this as well as anyone.

From the headline and beginning of this story it appears that General Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is in open mutiny against civilian authority:

U.S. general: No evidence Iran is arming Iraqis

Pace contradicts claims by other U.S. military, administration officials

JAKARTA, Indonesia - A top U.S. general said Tuesday there was no evidence the Iranian government was supplying Iraqi insurgents with highly lethal roadside bombs, apparently contradicting claims by other U.S. military and administration officials.

Wow. But what did Pace really say?
“That does not translate that the Iranian government per se, for sure, is directly involved in doing this,” Pace told reporters in the Indonesian capital, Jakarta. “What it does say is that things made in Iran are being used in Iraq to kill coalition soldiers.”
The AP editorialist (masquerading as a reporter) goes on to say:
His remarks might raise questions on the credibility of the claims of high-level Iranian involvement, especially following the faulty U.S. intelligence that was used to justify the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Perhaps the AP hack is referring to this sort of faulty intelligence?

Posted by: Bluto at 10:48 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 212 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I keep asking myself, "Self, at what point does this relentless litany of deceit comprise an evidentiary record that eliminates the 'absence of malice' dodge behind which the anti-American media hides? At what point - in order to preserve some semblance of democratic and electoral integrity in this country - does it necessitate a *real* independent investigation, some real accountability and some real federal jail time? Ever?"

Posted by: goy at February 13, 2007 12:22 PM (XyeTZ)

2 See Rusty's post on the sniper rifles to enjoy yet another "D'oh!" moment brought to you by the folks at the AP.

Posted by: w3 at February 13, 2007 12:27 PM (9TtwK)

3 goy: advertising copywriters are more honest than journalists these days. They have to be, due to false advertising laws. Of course, the AP advertises itself as a news service. Hmm...
 
w3: I read Rusty's post. .50 cal's are definitely bad news, and the story helps undermine what the AP is reporting here.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 13, 2007 12:50 PM (p52Ne)

4 Not in defense of the journalist but the link about faulty intel says nothing about WMD - wasn't that the main justification for war against Iraq? Not that there may be possibly could be some link with OBL - where is that guy BTW? Now he's in Iran?

Posted by: tbone at February 13, 2007 06:03 PM (HGqHt)

5 Weebone:


WMD were not the main reason for overthrowing saddam, and Bin Loser had a cooperation pact with Saddam--as you know full well.


Where is bin loser? What does that have to do with iraq? Acording to you he doesn't have anything to do with iraq.


Nice attempt at misdirection. The AP writer would be proud. Anybody with a shred of decency would be disgusted, of course.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 13, 2007 06:40 PM (Dt3sl)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
31kb generated in CPU 0.0164, elapsed 0.0556 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0462 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.