March 01, 2007

WND : Public Reax to Antonella Barba's Veterans' Memorial "Performance"

antonella-finger.JPG

WorldNetDaily reports that Antonella Barba's antics at the National WWII Veterans Memorial (NSFW images here) won't get her booted off the show by Fox, despite the fact that many members of the public are none too pleased with her. They sample a few opinions from around the internet, including the following:

"The photos of this young woman Antonella Barba on American Idol taken at the WWII Memorial are disrespectful and she should not be allowed to continue on the show. By allowing her to stay, Fox and "American Idol" are saying it is OK for her and other "Idol" contestants to break laws at war memorials, trample all over them and pose half nude in the waters of them. ... Fox and "Idol" would be saying, 'Hey, next year go take off half your clothes, jump in the waters in Pearl Harbor at the USS Arizona Memorial in Oahu, Hawaii, and pose like Anotnella Barba did.'"
"What nobody seems to understand is that some of the photos, which are clearly of her were taken in a public place and she intentionally posed for them. It's not like she was unwittingly photographed while getting undressed in her own bedroom. She invaded her own privacy by allowing these photos to be taken of her. Public nudity is illegal, plus, she desecrated a veteran's memorial. For that, she should have been arrested. But for publicly exploiting herself, she should be removed from the show. She is not a role model for young women to follow."

A few more opinions from here and there:

Fracas opines:

I don’t really care if the “really bad” ones are or if they aren’t Antonella, since my opinions were based on the photos that really are Antonella. . . . The offense of the type of photos taken at the [World] War II Memorial are enough for me, and I’m not even an American! For the insult to America that those photos represent, she should be asked to remove herself from the competition or be told to leave.

A blogger named Erin had this to say:

I'm sure that the 16 million Americans who served in the armed forces and the half a million Americans who lost their lives for our country in WWII are extremely honored to be part of the backdrop for some no-talent skank whore's half-assed attempt at compensating for the fact that she has no musical talent by getting her t-shirt wet.

American Idolater sez:

...if Antonella — the same girl who posed half-naked in a wet shirt out in public at the World War II memorial — is the least slutty person you know, then you might want to try to find some new people to hang out with. Seriously, what kind of people are Amanda’s other friends? How sad is that?

Smurf at Eluid.org:

I'm not sure where I was when they redefined the word slutty to not include girls that take photos of themselves on the toilet or half-naked in front of a war memorial. I would appreciate it if Merriam-Webster contacted me next time they plan on changing the definition of a word I use so frequently.

Eric at TheFingerman notes that the story's gotten some MSM attention:

Anyway, the Fox affiliate in D.C. had a hilarious story Monday night in which they went down to the World War II Memorial, showed visitors the Antonella photos and asked them what they thought. Of course, everyone was horrified and thought the pictures were disrespectful. (Of course, with TV news you never know--they could have interviewed ten other people who said the pictures were hot but they didn't play that tape.)

Zenblogger doubts the "oral" scandal will get Antonella kicked off, but isn't so sure about the memorial pictures:

Antonella will likely not be kicked off the show, as it’s nearly impossible to prove that she was in fact, the female on the receiving end of those oral sex pictures, especially when her friends are coming out and stating that she was not. The only other factor that could see her ejected [] is America’s tolerence to her disrespect of it’s fallen and her desecration of a hallow[ed] war memorial.
UPDATE by Rusty: I've been to the WWII Memorial only once. I described it in this post:
Cried as I found my grandfather's name at the new WWII memorial.
Those tears, by the way, were shared with my mom, who I called as soon as I found her father's name. My mom never knew her father. He was killed fighting the Japanese when she was just a toddler.

The Japanese not only robbed my grandfather of his life, they robbed my mother and myself the chance to ever get to know him.

Just thought I'd throw that in there. I am someone who has little problem blaspheming that which is held as sacred, but which isn't. But if there is such a thing as a place that is sacred, then the WWII Memorial surely is one of those places. The blood of my grandfather, if it is worth anything, has made it so.

Posted by: Ragnar at 01:40 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 850 words, total size 6 kb.

1 If someone wants to hump your mama's tombstone and take pictures, you'd be upset!                      USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 01, 2007 04:10 AM (2OHpj)

2 What part of, "this was her manager's idea" do you not understand? I have a manager. I know where these hare-brained ideas originate, and it isn't with the talent (I'm using the word talent loosely, in both her case and mine).

Of course, in my case I have a good manager who has good ideas and instincts... it's just her client who sucks. ;^)

Posted by: Hucbald at March 01, 2007 02:05 PM (Nxezv)

3 I'm just getting carried away. It will most likely pass when the next Sheehanite actually does something willfully destructive. Now those types I could really get carried away with!          USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 01, 2007 05:58 PM (2OHpj)

4 I at first was bothered when I saw it. But I have to ask this, many of the men who died were in their late teens and early twenties. They were from all walks of life. Ask yourself if they would object to having a memorial for them where a hot woman gets down to the nitty gritty for them. Having been a young service man one I can say it was a poor choice for a backdrop. And it was a nice choice for a model. It also shows how ignorant some people really are about our American history.

Posted by: SeeMonk at March 01, 2007 06:44 PM (yKwZ2)

5 She won't last long on the show

Posted by: Rep J at March 01, 2007 06:57 PM (O5VFo)

6 Seemonk,

I see it your way.  It doesn't bother me that much.  But it probably bothers the families who've lost sons and daughters in a war.  For that reason alone it's wrong.  But I'm not offended cause I don't think she meant it disrespectfully.  She's just clueless.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 02, 2007 10:24 AM (4A4lH)

7 Yeah, I said I was getting carried away. It is about the families to me.                        USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 02, 2007 10:17 PM (2OHpj)

8

Michael Weaver,


I find it disconcerting and disturbing that you sanctify the memorial yet ignore or forget why the memorial exists. The memorial exists because courageous men died to ensure that this young woman would have the right to do exactly what she is doing. A right that you cannot exercise is a right that you do not have.  


If your object to her actions were from a moralist point of view suggesting that her posing demonstrated a decay in the moral fabric of this nation that would be one thing.


However to suggest that her posing in a fountain whose purpose is to remind the nation of what our freedom cost in human terms is wrong transposes the sanctity of the memorial from the true meaning of the memorial to the stone edifice as if the fountain itself were sacred rather then the ideas it represents.  


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=16834

Posted by: doriangrey at March 03, 2007 02:29 PM (av5r1)

9

doriangrey !!! From a  "moralist point of view"  How do the families of those dead vets feel when she uses thier memorial for a striptease?  I'm willing to ignore nearly anything that consenting adults do behind closed doors. I'm having a little trouble ignoring what seems to be a callous disregard for the feelings of others by this kind of act.


Compared to the Islamic Thinkers trampling, and ripping the American flag on a public sidewalk, this IS pretty weak stuff. It is still a sign of disrespect on her part.


I NEVER ignore why any of our war memorials exist!


I choose not to ignore it when someone disregards the sanctity of  those memorials. If someone wants to really pick a fight over this ... fine! Let me spell it out for you. Her FREEDOM to do something disrespectful, thoughtless, and stupid, DOESN'T TRUMP MY FREEDOM TO CALL IT WHAT IT IS!  You talk about it as if the troops only died to protect her striptease, and not my right to be disgusted with her choice of location!  Are you a lefty?


In any case, there ARE worse things to be upset about.


USA, all the way!


Posted by: Michael Weaver at March 05, 2007 01:26 AM (2OHpj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
39kb generated in CPU 0.0137, elapsed 0.0336 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0255 seconds, 164 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.