April 15, 2005
I knew gay marriage would lead to this.
And for all you wholphin porn fans, here's a pic (scroll down). Apparently Dr. Moreau did this thing ten years ago too. Only they spelled it wolphin back in the day. You know, so as not to offend any one.
UPDATE: Llama Butchers find evidence of widespread dolphin/human breeding. Could Douglas Adams be right? Are aliens dolphins?
Posted by: Rusty at
09:06 AM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 15, 2005 09:44 AM (x+5JB)
I believe the proper term for whale penis is "dork".
Posted by: Jason Smith at April 15, 2005 11:12 AM (DG8d8)
Posted by: Dan at April 15, 2005 11:47 AM (q3pwu)
Posted by: Bill from INDC at April 15, 2005 12:20 PM (yZMsp)
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at April 15, 2005 12:45 PM (JQjhA)
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at April 15, 2005 12:57 PM (8NAWe)
Posted by: Defense Guy at April 15, 2005 01:41 PM (jPCiN)
Posted by: greg at April 15, 2005 01:55 PM (/+dAV)
Don’t let the feminazis find this out. Female reproductive biologists, who usually happen to be lesbians, are already aware of this fact, but it hasn’t gotten out to the general female population yet, nor should it.
Posted by: greg at April 15, 2005 02:02 PM (/+dAV)
Posted by: Brad at April 15, 2005 02:03 PM (NzgK/)
From the article it says:
Kekaimalu, whose name means 'from the peaceful ocean,' was born 19 years ago after a surprise coupling between a 14-foot, 2,000-pound false killer whale and a 6-foot, 400-pound dolphin. The animals were the leads in the park's popular tourist water show, featured in the Adam Sandler movie '50 First Dates.'...Kekaimalu has given birth to two other calves. One lived for nine years and the other, born when Kekaimalu was very young, died a few days after birth...Park researchers suspect the wholphin's father is a 15-foot long Atlantic bottlenose dolphin named Mikioi....'He seems to be totally oblivious to this happening,' Lenzi said..."
So the, um, appealing factors you're suggsting as to said coupling seem to be quite the opposite of what is likely to exist. A female larger than a male by, well, 400 percent morphology overall is likely to find the (much) smaller male appealing based upon the formula you're suggesting. Although it is said that the tiny French painter, Talouse Latrec (hope I spelled that corrctly, if not, so?), had a certain appeal to his female dancers who were four times his height.
Oh, the wonders of nature.
Posted by: -S- at April 15, 2005 02:39 PM (3dQxV)
Posted by: -S- at April 15, 2005 02:41 PM (3dQxV)
Posted by: -S- at April 15, 2005 02:42 PM (3dQxV)
Posted by: A Finn at April 15, 2005 03:12 PM (lGolT)
Nature is full of examples relative to human society. There is an all female species of lizard, Cnemidophorus uniparens, that gives virgin birth (Parthenogenesis). Two females will team up with each other. For two weeks one acts as the “male†and the other female and then they switch. They pretend to have sex with the male actor violently grabbing the female actor by the neck and swinging “his†cloaca in juxtaposition to “hersâ€. This courtship behavior has been shown in the laboratory to increase clutch size (the number of eggs laid at one time), presumably by affecting the endocrinology of the female actor. So even when “men’s†gametes aren’t required, male courtship behavior is beneficial to females.
Maybe that's why some women like it rough...an evolutionary vestige.
Posted by: greg at April 15, 2005 03:17 PM (/+dAV)
Something about taking hormones to prevent periods from starting and then taking a mild poison that interferes with the cells dividing, so they only halve themselves and when the egg starts going down the pipes, it has a full set of chromosomes, attaches to the sides and starts growing regularly, as long as anti-period hormones are used all the time.
Posted by: A Finn at April 15, 2005 03:23 PM (lGolT)
Posted by: greg at April 15, 2005 04:08 PM (/+dAV)
Posted by: A Finn at April 15, 2005 04:43 PM (lGolT)
Posted by: sparky at April 15, 2005 04:44 PM (F1nba)
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at April 15, 2005 04:54 PM (JQjhA)
Posted by: sandpiper at April 16, 2005 08:10 AM (AOQk0)
Posted by: Big Whale C*ck Lovers at April 19, 2005 01:40 AM (xUgQn)
Tolouse le Trec may be a little closer - I am no expert.
The above posts raise several interesting questions
How long does mammalian spermatozoa survive outside a potential 'proper receptacle'?
Is it capable of independant marine life, and if so for how long?
Does it possess enough genes to represent a potentially permanently 'lethal combination' of such?.
Is there a risk of perpetual hybridisation of the two species; or are either of them at permanent risk of (wild-populated), eventual extinction.
Speaking to Finn: I have never really understood the genetic nor even theoretically mathematical benefits of parthenogensis. Although rare, these advantages must exist. Aphids* are good example.
Another springs easily to mind (No disrepect).
I would like to think that the middle* experiment (by nature)is some sort of breeding experiment gone 'right'.
Nick (No fem: broke nose 6 times playing rugby.)
Still love the old footy and women (even if they hurt more!)
Posted by: Nicholas James Reid at June 16, 2005 05:23 PM (F1nba)
34 queries taking 0.0317 seconds, 178 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
