May 25, 2007

More on the Lost Libertarianism of "Star Wars"

Further to Rusty's message, any Star Wars geek knows that, the Star Wars movies paint a picture of an Empire that generally tolerates capitalism. Though the Emperor rules the political sphere with an iron fist, the details of day-to-day commerce seem to generally be left to the free market. The cantina at Mos Eisely (which may or may not have had another name, depending on who you ask) is a good example. The Imperials know generally what's going on there, but elect, for whatever reason, to look elsewhere. Same with the Jawas. Only the Maker knows what sort of illicit "free enterprise" those little bastards were up to. In Empire Strikes Back, when Lando's arguing with Vader in the Cloud City, Vader threatens him with a permanent garrison--implying that the Empire hadn't taken much of an interest in what was going on Bespin at that time, although it certainly could, if Calrissian wanted to push it. At any rate, geeks like me who pay attention to the underlying economic messages running through popular culture get the idea that the Empire is a fascist system--that is, "fascist" in the economic sense.

The missing Anchorhead conversation is an unfortunate omission. Star Wars as a movie about a fight over autoritarian central planning is even cooler than Star Wars as a movie about a fight against a bunch of white British guys and their planet-killing spaceship. Some war films, but definitely a minority, set forth an actual reason for the conflict between the two sides. Braveheart's a good example. The English were worth fighting against because otherwise they'd take your stuff and rape your wife. Continuing the general "anti-English" theme, Star Wars sets forth a titanic struggle between some hard-ass white British guys and everybody else, but it never goes much further than that. Taken at face value, the message of Star Wars might be "watch out for white British guys--and if you get the chance, you should definitely blow up their planet-killing spaceship." For better or worse, this message just doesn't have much general applicability at this point in history. Personally, I'd much more enjoy a movie about a struggle against authoritarian central planning.

Posted by: Ragnar at 11:58 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 370 words, total size 2 kb.

1 "Fascist?"

The Empire is anything <i>but</i> fascist, as the episode on Bespin illustrates rather well. The Empire and Lord Vader are well aware of Lando's less-than-legal ways, but have chosen not to care since his activities in no way harms the Empire or the Galactic peace. "No harm, no foul", a decidedly more laissez-faire approach than any "fascist" regime would ever adopt.

The only reason Lord Vader even brings up the subject is because he needs some leverage to get Lando to co-operate in the Empire's struggle to beat down the Rebel scum seeking to impose a U.N.-like bureaucracy on the Galaxy with their Jedi villains pulling the strings in the background. All he's "threatening" with is enforcing the law.

"Fascist"... Pshaw!

Posted by: Misha I at May 25, 2007 02:04 PM (gZFY1)

2 Ragnar, words cannot express how awesome your article is. Taken with the 'libertarian Skywalker' article, these are really making my day brighter. Thanks to all free market Jawa's          
                           USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at May 25, 2007 02:06 PM (2OHpj)

3 I'd point out that Lando was really considering himself lucky to have avoided most 'imperial' attention til lately.  Clearly the Empire LIKED to take interest in business enterprises. It was only a matter of thier capability to police a galaxy, that allowed criminal types like Lando, and other 'tribal' types like Jawas to avoid routine interference.  I thnkk Ragnar has it right.              USA, all the way!

Posted by: Michael Weaver at May 25, 2007 02:10 PM (2OHpj)

4 I think it's really just about who has the biggest light saber. You know, the device forms a shaft of pure energy about a meter long.

I hear they cut a scene with Obi-Wan and Darth sword fighting in the shower... not that there's anything wrong with that.

Posted by: QC at May 25, 2007 02:49 PM (PX+vn)

5 Han:  "Aren't you worried the Empire might find out about your little operation, shut you down?"
 
Lando:  "...it looms like a shadow over everything we do here; but I've just made a deal that will keep the Empire out of here forever."
 
Yes, I did that from memory.  Yes, I probably win the geek of the day award.  But, Lando was apparently concerned that the Empire would put an end to his enterprise, and it was enough of a possibility that Han asked about it without prompting.  I'm not sure, then, how that fits with laissez-faire.  Since the Tabana gas mine was not part of the mining guild (more geekdom), as it was "small enough not to be noticed," there was some official, Empire approved organization to which such operations were to belong.  That would seem a more corporatist aspect than laissez-faire, and closer to a fascist form of government. 

Posted by: Insomniac at May 25, 2007 02:52 PM (UYKDB)

6 All I know is that Luke and Leia's mom what a total pice of crap. She gives birth to the twins but dies because "she lost the will to live." The woman gives up on life and dies because her hubby turned out to be a bad guy. I guess the twins she delivered meant nothing to her. Whore!
 
Also, how the hell can you have Sam L. Jackson in a movie without his signature "That's some repugnant shit" line in it? To my knowledge he was the only black man in the most recent movies, and he's the only one with a purple light sabre. Discrimination, or bling?

Posted by: Rome at May 25, 2007 02:54 PM (/GrlO)

7 Rome, mesa remembers reading that Jar-Jar Binks was a black man.

Posted by: QC at May 25, 2007 03:39 PM (PX+vn)

8 Rome, Ahh you miss the subtleness.  She dies expending energy (the force) so that Darth Vader will live.

Also what will happen to Luke in the next three chapters. He has just inherited an empire. Will he sacrafice order for a complete politcal overhaul? Or will he choose the quick and easy path and work with what he is left to save the people from suffering under disorder and become the next Emporer.  I think Yoda has answered that question already......

Yoda:
Decide you must what to serve them best. If you leave now, help them
you could but you would destroy all for which they have fought and
suffered.


YODA: Only a fully trained Jedi Knight with the Force as his ally will
conquer Vader and his Emperor. If you end your training now, if you
choose the quick and easy path, as Vader did, you will become an agent
of evil.



Posted by: Howie at May 25, 2007 04:09 PM (YHZAl)

9 We already have a imperial senate when sen will we get DARTH VADER? and when do they start contruction of the DEATH STAR?

Posted by: sandpiper at May 25, 2007 06:02 PM (Zy1Y5)

10 Darth Vader?  We should be so lucky.

Seems to me we're stuck with Dark Helmet.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold, Arrogant Prick at May 25, 2007 07:40 PM (c/4ax)

11 Yoda is my hero because he is a cross between hyuman and minature dachshund.

Posted by: philport at June 01, 2007 12:59 PM (ESEDx)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
36kb generated in CPU 0.0196, elapsed 0.0403 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0289 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.