July 05, 2006

Maddox on Manliness, Tucker Max on Feminism

Tucker Max, in the course of reviewing Maddox's book "The Alphabet of Manliness," rationally dissects the history of modern feminism. What's next? Dogs and cats sleeping together? Hillary registers Republican? Osama turns to Jesus? At any rate, here it is:

To understand where current culture is, you need to understand how we got here. Feminism came in three "waves"; 1st Wave, which was suffrage (the right to vote), 2nd Wave, which was the 60's and 70's sexual and social revolution fought for inclusion, and 3rd Wave, which is what we have now. It emphasizes freedom of choice for women regardless of what decision they make. Thus it endorses everything from porn to girly culture (in addition to a bunch of post modern horseshit which is irrelevant to any intelligent discussion, much less this one).

Of course, First Wave feminism was a substantial human advancement. Aside from universal suffrage, only the rule of law and the scientific method have done more to advance the human condition. Second Wave feminism was also necessary at the time. It threw off the stifling societal bonds limiting women's ability to be who they wanted to be and advance in fields they choose. However, Second Wave feminism went too far in some ways.

Man, this all feels really wierd. Read the rest here.

Maddox, for his part, provides the following summary of his own book:

This is the only sentence in the entire book that will give you a chance to adjust your face; take your time, because it’s about to be rocked off—permanently.

Finally, a book that guarantees your balls will be stomped; a book so manly that it will make even the burliest of men (and in some cases, the burliest of women) feel inadequate. So manly, it needs to be shaved: The Alphabet of Manliness. This collection of sacred writings may very well be the greatest compilation of all things manly throughout history. Here’s a small sample of the ass-kickery found within these revered pages of outright manliness:

People getting drop-kicked in the face

Phallic aggression

Violence in excess of what has come to be known as excessive

Garish disregard for the well-being of children

Contempt for animals, women, and other cultures

Intimidating rhetoric

Obscure penile references

The triumph of flannel over good taste

This book is only for the saltiest, hairiest, most rugged son of a bitch out there. However, it would be selfish to keep it for myself, so feel free to buy a copy. This humble tome of wisdom is a tribute to all men who toil away at work every day, getting their balls busted, or busting balls.

Maddox is a unique, hairy, ball-stomping talent, but he's not for everyone. If you want another taste, you might check out his stint as an art critic or his opinion of Cameron Diaz.

Posted by: Ragnar at 06:51 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 511 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I look around at the festering cesspool our society has become, and somehow can't quite buy into the statement that feminism, from suffrage to now, has advanced the human condition one damned bit. What it has done is to allow women to degrade and debase themselves without repercussion, and encourages men to partake in this travesty. Women are the traditional keepers of an important part of our civilization, but now they're mostly a bunch of amoral whores, and the average man is no better. The destruction of the traditional family was one of the cornerstones of Marx's plan to destroy Western civilization and replace it with a Communist dystopia; feminism is simply a tool to accomplish that goal. I dare anyone to refute me.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at July 05, 2006 07:03 PM (v3I+x)

2 1912 Atlanta. Who knew? I Didn't until yesterday.

Posted by: Howie at July 05, 2006 07:28 PM (D3+20)

3 IM -

I don't know about the women in YOUR family, but the women in MY family certainly aren't "amoral whores." I'm guessing other readers may have similar sentiments towards the women in their own families. Some might even be offended by your blanket assertion that their mothers, sisters and wives (or at least most of them) are "amoral whores."

I know a number of women who have no interest whatsoever in a husband or children. They'd be completely miserable cooped up in a kitchen or nursery, and giving them the freedom to hang out elsewhere represents a significant improvement in their "human condition."

Some people claim that Marie Curie made some pretty important scientific contributions. Do scientific discoveries count as "advancing the human condition?"

I understand the GIs fighting WWII were more than happy to use the guns, bullets and other weaponry assembled by the "liberated" women back home. To the extent that those weapons shortened the war and brought an end to the march of fascism, I think that counts as "advancing the human condition."

Some have said that the "liberated" women involved in the civil rights struggle "advanced the human condition." I'd say they have a good point.

Some have gone so far as to assert that the Prime Ministership of Margaret Thatcher involved a certain "advancement of the human condition." I think they're right.

I think you can consider yourself refuted.

Posted by: The All-Seeing Eye at July 05, 2006 10:55 PM (fZeeX)

4 You post your comments after striking out on a date, don't you?

Posted by: spherical human at July 06, 2006 12:54 AM (spznq)

5 Spherical:

Chicks are "amoral whores" these days (just ask Improbulus), so even a stony, one-eye freak like myself can easily score even the finest tail at the drop of a hat. In fact, I'd have to say the "freakiness" factor helps more than it hurts. Hence, no "striking out." Come on, y'all--a DISEMBODIED EYE perched on a MASSIVE TOWER? THAT, y'all, is something SERIOUS and something REAL. THAT'S something to tell the great-grandkids about. And you better know that "fame" factor don't hurt--between all the Washingtons & those "Lord of the Rings" flicks. Aragorn? He ain't got nothin' on the Eye. And you KNOW Eye plays that "Illuminati" shit up. Hey, pimpin' ain't easy, but it's necessary...

Posted by: The All-Seeing Eye at July 06, 2006 02:52 AM (c/4ax)

6 I read IM's statement regarding the abandonment of respect for the institution of motherhood, the overall destructiveness of rabid feminism, and many woman acting like "amoral whores" much in the same way that one might interpret the statement "Women today dress too immodestly compared with a generation ago." Obviously such a statement does not include each and every woman, and yet it remains, on the whole, true.

Posted by: YBP at July 06, 2006 12:27 PM (gZnyq)

7 Eye, none of the citations you used have anything to do with the feminist movement. Marie Curie, along with many other young ladies of her time, was simply an exceptional student who became an exceptional contributor to society, but she didn't have to ride the coattails of Susan B. Anthony to get there. The women who worked in the war factories during WWII were not a new thing. And the civil rights movement? Tell me how blacks are sooooo much better off today than they were fifty years ago, as they now make up most of the unemployed and criminal elements within our society. Just because a few things changed doesn't make everything better.
The fact is that society would have been better off if changes in racist and sexist attitudes had been allowed to evolve normally rather than be forced into being by revolutionary movements, because now we're seeing the backside of the movement.
Refuted? No, not even close.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at July 06, 2006 03:44 PM (v3I+x)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
35kb generated in CPU 0.024, elapsed 0.0607 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0492 seconds, 162 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.