February 24, 2007

*Yes, that's an actual quote. :-)
Posted by: Good Lt. at
08:39 AM
| Comments (42)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Edward Lunny at February 24, 2007 09:57 AM (QkaPP)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at February 24, 2007 10:46 AM (vRnST)
<b>Dick:</b> "That's @#$!!ing great, Mr. President."
Posted by: McGehee at February 24, 2007 02:08 PM (lAOTn)
Posted by: Timothy S. Carlson at February 24, 2007 03:54 PM (TfTAE)
Reporter: "Why is it so expensive, Mr. President?"
Bush: "You wouldn't believe how many liberals it takes to make a gram of this stuff!"
<rimshot>
Thank you, thank you. I'm here all week. Enjoy the buffet!
Posted by: Timothy S. Carlson at February 24, 2007 03:58 PM (TfTAE)
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 24, 2007 04:08 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 24, 2007 04:13 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 24, 2007 04:15 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Hucbald at February 24, 2007 04:35 PM (w8csg)
Posted by: dr. akim ullshitbay at February 24, 2007 08:09 PM (lM0Mr)
Posted by: SecretSquirrel at February 24, 2007 09:34 PM (YwdKL)
Posted by: Bubbe at February 24, 2007 10:29 PM (vZBQO)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:03 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:05 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:09 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:12 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:17 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:22 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:23 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:26 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:31 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:46 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 24, 2007 11:56 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 07:09 AM (2OHpj)
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 02:41 PM (JVqe0)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUnwbpNejsQ
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 04:08 PM (JVqe0)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 07:54 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 07:55 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 07:56 PM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 25, 2007 07:57 PM (Dt3sl)
Osamabinstalking
You asked me why I might defend Jeff, and greyrooster. You may not know this, but a few times I also defended No Fear, who is pretty clearly a lefty. Well besides the fact I consider Jeff, and greyrooster to be on my side a lot of the time, I don't like to see anyone stalked from thread to thread, and I try to catch myself when I feel the urge to do some of it myself.
Greyrooster, and Jeff often have very good points, and even if I disagree with some of them, they do deserve as much chance to be heard as anyone. No Fear I actually seemed to get along with, and I think actually discussing the differences of opinion had merit.
I resort to name calling sometimes. If I get mad, I usually settle on some fairly simple term, like 'dork' and call my target by that. It allows me to show disgust, but it still keep the sentences free of a lot of extra garbage. Even that, I try to avoid. Sometimes I call someone ignorrant when it is uncalled for.
Now it so happens that I value the patriotism of Jeff, and Greyrooster, and for that reason alone, I would defend their ability to comment here. If only for the sake of free speech, I even value Ken Hoop's comments, though I still have an obligation to attack them.
Comments like #26 aren't argueing. They aren't necessarily funny, and they are intended to demean other commenters, regardless of the merits of any arguements made by those commenters. It isn't cool to have to sort through these on every single thread. If you can't ignore Jeff's name-game, you could handle it differently.
I admit, I don't usually care for Jeff's name calling, but sometimes it is actually funny. With Jeff, I try to read the content of his arguement. If there is no content beyond a personal attack, I ussually just skip over it. If I see two or three in a row, that are only an attack, I skip the thread. If I see two or three personal attacks, minus an actual arguement, from ANYONE, in a row ... I will usually skip the rest of the thread.
I doubt I'm the only one who does this.
So lets see ... since your squabbling with grey, and Jeff, then there is a pretty good chance that I'll get three in a row wherever all three of you are at. If we lump in some of the others who like the personal attack, well, I could just go to Town Hall and get my news fix.couldn't I?
A little name calling is OK. When everyone piles on, it gets bad, and I'm VERY AGAINST BANNING PEOPLE, so I hope nobody thinks that is my point. I'm saying, if you think your a great debator, then DEBATE, dammit!! Let the reader decide who to skip over, and stop adding jumps to the course OK???
COMMENTER! POLICE THYSELF!!! Raise the bar, don't go under it! Leave that for others.
I like Greyroooster, and Jeff just fine, and I'm not following your 'funny' links. If they do that to you, I'm not following those links either. I'm boycotting all of those links! Everyone got that?
I'm not going to post any funny links of my own about Ken Hoop either. I'm not perfect, but flinging giant monkey turds isn't that hard to avoid doing!
Since Jeff, and greyrooster may read this, may I encourage my allies to take this occassion to consider the value of thier arguements, That value may be lost when people don't read past the personal attack portion. It's something to consider.
Anyway, Osamabinnotasfunnyashethinksheis, I hope you understand this longish answer to your question, and I hope I have had some influence in raising the level of exchange. It's something WE ALL SHOULD DO.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 08:02 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 08:03 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 09:28 PM (JVqe0)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 25, 2007 10:38 PM (2OHpj)
Posted by: osamabinhiding at February 25, 2007 10:50 PM (ZxuJ4)
Don't fool yourself. Nobody appreciates you.
I respectfully submit that you only swipe at people online--and any poor men in your hateful life who are subject to the misandrist lawsof your local government.
We both know you wouldn't have the guts to swipe at me in person.
My captions are still thefunniest, by the way. There's nothing funny about your intolerance or stupidity.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 26, 2007 02:03 AM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: osamabinthere at February 26, 2007 03:31 AM (ZxuJ4)
Posted by: tbone at February 26, 2007 11:11 AM (HGqHt)
Posted by: ken at February 26, 2007 04:18 PM (qE06o)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 26, 2007 06:54 PM (2OHpj)
Heaven forbid I should be mean to a shit-licking troll who hates America almost as much as she does men and their penises.
Shouldn't you be sitting on the Naked Trucker's lap eating a glazed doughnut?
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 27, 2007 03:33 AM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: sandpiper at February 28, 2007 11:32 AM (4pkrX)
34 queries taking 0.0343 seconds, 197 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.