jawa.mee.nu

June 29, 2006

Blink 182 Singer Claims 9/11 an Inside Job

Tom DeLange, former guitarist for one of my favorite bands, Blink 182, forgot to put the tinfoil hat on at a recent interview at a San Diego radio station. 9/11 was not the work of Muslim terrorists, but rather the work of our own government. From what I understand, this isn't the first time he's opened his mouth to reveal his stupidity on 9/11, but it's new to me.

Yeah, this is the same guy who wrote these lyrics from Aliens Exist

--we all know conspiracies are dumb.

Dumbass. Then again, this website claims Tom believes in aliens, that he has been abducted, and that he is the victim of alien anal probing....

Apparently, he was Eric Cartman in the previous life. That would explain a lot.

Via Drew Curtis's minions, this from prison planet:

During a hosting spot on a San Diegoâ€™s KAVA-FM radio station, DeLonge talked with Professor James Fetzer about evidence of 9/11 inside involvement.
"We do know that the buildings came down in a fashion extremely similar to a controlled demolition of a building - we do know that expertise that is needed to fly those gigantic planes into that exact location could never have been achieved by someone that just learned how to fly a small plane, said DeLonge."...
"Cheney knew that the planes are coming in and he capped the order to leave it alone so it could hit."...
"It's so weird how our own government did it to us, 9/11 was not perpetrated by a bunch of people that just learned how to fly planes,"...
"We're talking about 60-70% of the American people are actually starting to think that there's a different story, why are we as Americans sitting back and letting this happen to us?"...
"This isn't about the red or blue, this is about this administration being involved in something that is really really scary and really really dark and deceptive."

The thing that always attracted me to Blink was that they weren't part of the whiney Berkeley cowd (I'm looking at you Green Day) that tried to emulate the overtly political lyrics of the British punk invasion. Instead, they were solidly Orange County and seemed to follow the American punk tradition of the Ramones. Maybe they were trying to say something "important", but were just too dumb to get it right.

Posted by: Rusty at 06:40 PM | Comments (41) | Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Johnny Ramone would be spinning in his grave, that someone influenced by him should be so dumb.

Posted by: Jester at June 29, 2006 06:44 PM (TuAMG)

2 He's not dead. He's with Elvis.

Posted by: Rusty at June 29, 2006 06:50 PM (BXC/2)

3 Doesn't this imply that you thought the guys from Blink are smart?

Posted by: Leopold Stotch at June 29, 2006 06:58 PM (kH2hz)

4 No, but it does imply that maybe THEY think they're smart.

Posted by: Rusty at June 29, 2006 07:00 PM (BXC/2)

5 I live in San Diego and I listened to this piling heap of a radio show. It was on 91x and this fool and his other band of fools did a mock take-over as DJ's and called it KAVA-FM. It was utter conspiratorial nonsense. No one asked the question of why the government would do this to it's own citizenry. Also, there was no challenge to the effect that even if any of these fools had absolute proof that the administration masterminded an attack like this (contrary to their assertions that Bush himself and his administration are dumber than a box of rocks) then who would believe them and what would they do about it?

Posted by: Asmodeus at June 29, 2006 07:04 PM (Oh7dN)

6 Good to see you back and strapped on!!!

Just yesterday, in a one sided word orgy from a former customer of mine, I learned that the twin towers were no act of terrorism/it was an act of our government/there is no such thing as terrorists/spain train nope and you get the drift Moore or less. He had just seen Duh Video. Did I mention "It's all about the oil, man!" and that this guy is French?

A couple of Brits within earshot of his tirade asked me why I didn't say anything. I asked them where does one begin with someone who's mind has been voluntarily removed with all the surgical skill of a hand grenade?

I then invited the two Brits over to celebrate the fourth of July with me.

Posted by: forest hunter at June 29, 2006 07:06 PM (TjUVb)

7 I had a student try to get me to watch one of the conspiracy videos. I didn't know whether to laugh at him or punch him in the mouth.

Posted by: Rusty at June 29, 2006 07:22 PM (BXC/2)

8 Tom DeLange, demolition expert or nose-picking idjit?

Posted by: Elzbth at June 29, 2006 08:12 PM (utJ4A)

9 Should have gone with both Rusty.

Posted by: Mr. Mxyzptlk at June 29, 2006 10:03 PM (Nv6CM)

10 Elvis works for my page.

Posted by: dick at June 29, 2006 10:19 PM (Em77H)

11 I wonder how they try to explain United 93.

Posted by: pka54 at June 29, 2006 10:42 PM (5E3/0)

12 Since it is obvious that none of you have read any U.S. history, maybe you should visit this site.

http://www.wtc7.net/

Get your head out of your ass and help save the country. You tv boomers think that everything you are feed on the TV is real. Read a book, or learn about operation northwoods. Give me libert or give me death.

Posted by: andy at June 29, 2006 10:57 PM (st1Vg)

13 shudda bought that fucking Alcoa stock.

Posted by: Brad at June 30, 2006 12:13 AM (utJ4A)

14 WTF Andy?

"You tv boomers think that everything you are feed on the TV is real."

So how is this scrappy video (on TV - BTW) supposed to be proof of something? Perhaps you are feed on too much libert there Andy.

Never mind that I don't watch TV or believe in the (close your ears kids) tooth fairy.

Posted by: forest hunter at June 30, 2006 12:49 AM (TjUVb)

15 check out steven e jones paper ' why indeed the the wtc collapse'? its a peer reviewed paper by a BYU professor. Do some research and yuo will see that buildng dont fall straight down unless experts plant explosives in them. The implosion industry exists precisely because it doesnt happen naturally. 9/11 is the ONLY time in history that modern building have collapsed from fire, and it is the ONLY time in history that 'random' damage casued near-symettrical collapses. Thats pretty incredible, and when yuo factor in the 'carte blanche' that 9/11 gave the administration to do whatever it wants, its damn convenient too.

Posted by: jimbiz at June 30, 2006 01:41 AM (wQ2KC)

16 Who left the door open?

Could you morons at least learn to spell, type and punctuate your inane babbling?

Posted by: forest hunter at June 30, 2006 02:06 AM (TjUVb)

17 "...The implosion industry exists precisely because it doesnt happen naturally..."

Howeird Deano and his clueless lot would be evidentiary argument to the contrary.

Posted by: forest hunter at June 30, 2006 02:14 AM (TjUVb)

18 I've taken part in an extensive review of that paper. It's a pile of unfounded assertions, quotes taken out of context, and general asshattery. It's written by a physicist, not an engineer, and has been roundly denounced by BYU's engineering department.

It is, in short, utterly worthless.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 30, 2006 03:53 AM (FRalS)

19 I liked Blink too. Too bad about this guy's dumbass beliefs.

Conspiracy theories comfort people who are frightened by the random nature of reality.

The best debunking of this demolition crap is up at Scientific American. Whenever you run into these assholes, tell them to go and read that and get back to you. It's up on line, and it's irrefutable.

Posted by: jd at June 30, 2006 07:33 AM (DQYHA)

20 You people here are just sleeping. I have to ask you who pays you to come to places that discuss 9-11 and rank on those that know that this fraud of a President has pulled off one of the greatist scams in History?
Who pays you ..WHO?

Posted by: Jason at June 30, 2006 04:18 PM (bM4TJ)

21 Jason : I dunno but if you find out can you tell em to send mine.

Posted by: Howie at June 30, 2006 04:26 PM (D3+20)

22 I had to look right now it's netflix. Nexflix is behind all this? Are they owned by the jooooooos?

Posted by: Howie at June 30, 2006 04:28 PM (D3+20)

23 Operation Northwoods? Where the fuck were you when militia nut bags were saying OK City was an inside job?

Posted by: h0mi at June 30, 2006 08:07 PM (TcPUH)

24 911 Loose Change 2nd Edition with extra footage

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=911

Terror Storm

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4757274759497686216&q=terror+storm

911 = Who Killed John Oneill = a must for Patriots

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4755449627173127935&q=911+john+oneil

911 Eyewitness

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=911+eye+witness

Posted by: 11:11 at June 30, 2006 08:21 PM (bM4TJ)

25 911 Loose Change 2nd Edition with extra footage

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=911

Terror Storm

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4757274759497686216&q=terror+storm

911 = Who Killed John Oneill = a must for Patriots

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4755449627173127935&q=911+john+oneil

911 Eyewitness

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=911+eye+witness

Posted by: 11:11 at June 30, 2006 08:24 PM (bM4TJ)

26 check out steven e jones paper ' why indeed the the wtc collapse'?
While you're doing that, why not check out his paper entitled "Behold My Hands: Evidence for
Christ's Visit in Ancient America"

http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/rel491/handstext and figures.htm

One paper about Jesus visiting North America, the other on WTC. credible.

get a clue, meatpuppet.

Posted by: davec at June 30, 2006 10:24 PM (voZp6)

27 Well, this guy is a douchebag. Like the Bush administration could really pull off a successful operation.

Posted by: Joe at June 30, 2006 11:32 PM (5zxY/)

28 I wonder how much rusty shackleford has looked into how mcuh overwhelming evidence there is to suggests that there is far more to 9/11 than the official government story is telling us. I would of called it crazy too until i started looking much closer.

I would say this particular article too is rather slanted and biased, not to mention insulting. If you cant find any other way to bring someone down other than insulting them (i.e show us your hard facts to back up your end of the story) its obvious your a very simple, opinionated and anally retentive reporter.

Posted by: Dave at July 01, 2006 06:36 AM (GETiZ)

29 I wonder if rusty shackleford has looked into how much overwhelming evidence there is to suggest that there is far more to 9/11 than the official government story is telling us. I would of called it crazy too until i started looking much closer, and realised that high rise steel frame buildings do not and have never been pulversized to extremely fine dust particles on the order of 30-300 microns across by a 'fire and collision damage'.

The buildings exploded into dust (in 10 seconds flat), molten pools of metal were found underneath the towers, burning for months! No large chunks of building, no remains, no office equipment, no nothing, just dust.

I would say this particular article too is rather slanted and biased, not to mention insulting. If you cant find any other way to bring someone down other than insulting them (i.e show us your hard facts to back up your end of the story) its obvious your a very simple, opinionated and anally retentive reporter.

Posted by: Dave at July 01, 2006 06:42 AM (GETiZ)

30 There are websites debunking Loose Change, I commend them to all who might see it and think, for just a moment, that the government was involved.

I'm not automatically opposed to all conspiracy theories. I'm open to the idea that the Ruskies tried to have the Pope killed, and while I think Oswald acted alone, I don't think it is a dead certainty. But 9-11? Puhleaz! There's a better chance that the CIA is running your brain through electronic controls in your teeth fillings.

Posted by: jd at July 01, 2006 11:14 AM (DQYHA)

31 1. The Bush administration took down the WTC with a controlled demolition to trick us into war.
2. Bette Midler had a love child by Yasser Arafat.
3. I have a tiny flying saucer in my garage.
4. Remember, if you're very sincere, reality is what you want it to be. Clap for Tinkerbell.

Posted by: Brentbo at July 01, 2006 12:59 PM (c70Hc)

32 Thanks to people like the "Dave" above, I have decided to invest in the "Bacofoil" company, people like him and Greg need a constant supply to keep their head wrapped.

Posted by: davec at July 01, 2006 02:36 PM (voZp6)

33 Ignorance is bliss! Do the research and then speak, all of you just take what is given to you. WAKE UP!

Posted by: does it matter at July 03, 2006 10:48 AM (yS09P)

34 JD Conspiracy theories comfort people who are frightened by the random nature of reality.

.. for one.. a airliner place crashing
into two towers.. and the pentagon..
is not random nature of reality..
i'm not sure if your idiotic ass has noticed
but look how this country has been ever
since the attacks.., phone lines are being tapped,
this country can be locked down by their new
"terror alert" system , every americans
freedom has been taken away, and yes
i'm glad this guitarist from blink is speaking out the truth which many people are scared to do

Posted by: st0n3 at July 03, 2006 11:10 AM (utJ4A)

35 Every jackass who actually believes what the media tells them is a simple minded fool
Bush and his administration are nothing but
professional liars who spreads their propagnda
to get what they want , they dont care
how many innocent people they kill
Its sad to see that many americans know this
yet they do nothing about it

Posted by: st0n3 at July 03, 2006 11:15 AM (utJ4A)

36 Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. By "random nature of reality" I meant to suggest that for some people, it seems impossible that a nation as powerful and technologically sophisticated as the US could be attacked so easily by 19 fanatics armed with box cutters. It does not, however, take a grand conspiracy involving an inside job of 1000's of people to pull this off.

And the steps that have happened since were not planned in advance. They happened due to countless negotiations and interactions among executive branch and (too infrequently) congressional and judicial branch authorities.

It would be oddly comforting to think that there was a single unified conspiracy behind 9-11 and everything that has happened since. Because if it were done that way, the solution would be difficult, but simple--find them, remove them, and the wrong will be righted. But the awful truth is much more complex, and much more difficult. Islamofascists hit us, and we spiralled into a disastrous war in Iraq. True, it had long been in the planning by neo-cons, but they were opportunistic, not conspiratorial, with regards to 9-11.

I've looked at the conspiracy theories for 9-11, and whether it is the arabs saying it was Mossad, and all the Jews got out, or lefties saying it was planned by Bush, they are all equally bogus, bozo, and afactual.

Posted by: jd at July 03, 2006 04:55 PM (DQYHA)

37 You have no idea if the steps were planned before the attacks.., i've have heard an audio recording of FEMA saying they were going to do a clean up job the night before the attacks happened, another case is how the twin towers fell , firefighters stated that they saw explosions going on inside the buildings like if they were some sort of bombs.., and if you look at the video it looks like they were demolished, recently on the news they were trying to show this plane that hit the pentagon? why is that? one to stop the truth movement, two to bring up that hate many Americans have against Muslims now to invade yet another country "iran" , the video they showed didn't prove anything, it was the same still photos they had showed many years ago, why did the government take all the tapes from local gas stations, motels and other areas.. and have not released those tapes to the public, have you looked around your streets lately? have you noticed all the police officers that are out there watching everyone's single move , its not like before.., its getting ridiculous and out of control , JD you claim you've looked at the 911 conspiracies.. , maybe you haven't looked much into them because theres alot you dont know.., and i'm not sure if you know this.. , but theres a bunch of other countries who are doing their own investigations about 911 and believe it was an inside job, and as for iraq.., that war was pretty much pointless.., innocent of americans and iraqis have died because of it.., who led us into that war? BUSH , i'm not saying he's planning everything, to me bush is nothing more but a mear puppet and as for osama, hes what I like to call a scapegoat .., you can believe what you want, I know the truth about 911

Posted by: st0n3 at July 03, 2006 07:23 PM (Jj1Zo)

38 You only wish you were as hot as Tom DeLonge!!!!

Posted by: Alyssa at July 05, 2006 02:14 PM (utJ4A)

39 You only wish you were as hot as Tom DeLonge!!!!

Posted by: Alyssa at July 05, 2006 02:14 PM (utJ4A)

40 it is a scientific fact now that 9/11 was an inside job. objects cannot fall through steel and concrete as fast as they fall through the air for one thing. anyone who disagrees can email me. nickspinner@gmail.com
I hope everyone wakes up to this quick because American dictatorship is not too far away if this isnt exposed. 9/11 was clearly another played out problem-reaction-solution

Posted by: Nick at July 07, 2006 01:47 PM (+vXvv)

41 why is it when someone proposes another idea or theory that individual is attacked personally, called dumbass, nut, etc. In a Ad Hominem logical arguement it does not matter who proposes the arguement to determine if it is valid or not. You simply look at the actual arguement and not the person. another words if Charlie Manson said, Canada is North of the United States, this could be true even if he is crazy.

so, when Tom D says something, lets discuss if what he said is true or not and not attack him personally.

If someone could answer me these four proposals on the subject of the 9/11 story;

1. How did World Trade Center tower 7 collapse in a freefall (8 seconds) without a plane hitting it and no major fires?

2. Where is the plane wreckage in front of the pentagon and in the ditch in Pennyslvania (no wreckage on video and pics)?

3. How did the 757 that hit the pentagon fit in the 16 ft wide by 24 ft hole shown in pics and video of the crash site and not leave the wings, tail and engines on the lawn (google 911 in plane site)?

4. How were the 4 hijacked planes allowed to fly over NY and Washington (World's most protected airspace) for an average of 40 minutes each and a total of 2 hours without ANY NORAD fighter jet intercept?

attack me if you must, and see if you can answer these three questions?

peace
Shawn

Posted by: Shawn Cooper at July 10, 2006 02:49 PM (ZRr3H)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

52kb generated in CPU 0.0213, elapsed 0.0453 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0309 seconds, 196 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

June 29, 2006

Recent Comments