May 01, 2007
Come on, MSM. Pinchy. Katie. Olby. Seriously, guys.
Even CREW is getting on Feinstein's case (although until today, they have been rather silent on Feinstein since January). From The Hill:
She is currently chairwoman of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies subcommittee, but until last year was for six years the top Democrat on the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies (or “Milconâ€) sub-committee, where she may have directed more than $1 billion to companies controlled by her husband.Well, DUH.If the inferences finally coming out about what she did while on Milcon prove true, she may be on the way to morphing from a respected senior Democrat into another poster child for congressional corruption.
The problems stem from her subcommittee activities from 2001 to late 2005, when she quit. During that period the public record suggests she knowingly took part in decisions that eventually put millions of dollars into her husband’s pocket — the classic conflict of interest that exploited her position and power to channel money to her husband’s companies.
In other words, it appears Sen. Feinstein was up to her ears in the same sort of shenanigans that landed California Rep. Randy “Duke†Cunningham (R) in the slammer. Indeed, it may be that the primary difference between the two is basically that Cunningham was a minor leaguer and a lot dumber than his state’s senior senator.
Another question - if CREW can't and/or won't monitor the corruption and ethics of the majority of Congresscritters, what good are they?
Posted by: Good Lt. at
08:15 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 268 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 01, 2007 09:34 PM (pW/bR)
Posted by: Michael Weaver at May 02, 2007 11:21 AM (2OHpj)
34 queries taking 0.0818 seconds, 157 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









