May 31, 2007

Media Ignoring Al-Qaeda Torture Manual

MRC notes that the mainstream networks and CNN ran over 6000 stories on Abu Gharib.

Yet a heinous torture manual captured from a freedom fighter an al-Qaeda safe house in Iraq, complete with requisite disturbing illustrations on how to mutilate prisoners and inflict as much pain on them as humanly possible in direct violation of every international human rights and POW convention ever wailed about by leftards the world over, simply isn't as newsworthy to our media.

Because reporting these facts with the veracity and repetition of Abu Gharib is, apparently, "pro-war propaganda."

ht: LGF

Posted by: Good Lt. at 06:29 PM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Its just wasnt jucie enough for those crooks

Posted by: sandpiper at June 01, 2007 10:38 AM (oCdmx)

2 Greenwald does a fairly good job of answering the question for you:
 
"The reason that it is news that the U.S. tortures, but not news that Al Qaeda does, is because Al Qaeda is a barbaric and savage terrorist group which operates with no limits, whereas the U.S. is supposed to be something different than that. Isn't it amazing that one even needs to point that out?


But neoconservatives and other Bush followers do not recognize that distinction and do not believe in it. They see an equivalency between the U.S. and Al Qaeda -- since they do it, we are justified in doing it. And thus, based on that equivalency, they demand that the media treat stories of torture from the U.S. and Al Qaeda exactly the same, as though they are equally newsworthy.


And with that twisted equivalency bolted into place, they have dragged our country on a path where that premise is becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Our own interrogation methods are reverse-engineered from the most brutal and barbaric countries and groups on the planet. And the policies and practices we have adopted over the last six years embody everything which this country, for decades, vocally deplored. But all of that happened because of this "belief" -- which is really just a self-justifying rationalization -- that we not only have the right to be, but that we must be, exactly like Al Qaeda, do what they do, in order to defeat them. "


http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/?last_story=/opinion/greenwald/2007/06/01/al_qaeda/


Posted by: Bo at June 01, 2007 02:52 PM (Ywo+X)

3 U.S. Torture manual page 1. Place panties on head. This will embarrass muslims as their women think panties are veils. Page 2. Now we get tough. Serve them a ham sandwich for lunch. page 3 is just to horrible to discuss.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 02, 2007 12:24 AM (0CFtS)

4

Greyrooster,


What are you smoking?  The evidence that has surfaced to date indicates that the US is practicing forms of torture such as waterboarding.  We have lost our moral compass and are becoming the USSR in more ways than one.
 
Get your head out of your ass.

Posted by: Bo at June 02, 2007 08:06 AM (euN4c)

5 Bo -

What are you smoking?

We have hard, direct evidence that AQ is torturing its detainees (including US troops, innocent civilians and citizens of other countries) by drilling holes through their hands, placing hot irons on their skins, gouging out their eyes, rending their bones and flesh with bolt cutters, hanging them from ceilings while beating them with chains, videotapes of them slitting throats of pleading victims while chanting hate to their moongod and ill-will towards America, etc.

They're not trying to get information. They're not trying to save lives. THEY'RE DOING IT WITH NO OTHER INTENT THAN TO CAUSE SUFFERING AND DEATH FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH.

The US isn't even in the same zipcode with "waterboarding." Everything we give these subhuman pieces of trash is too good for them. If it were up to you, they're gt off with ACLU, taxpayer financed defense attorneys, an apology and a million dollar settlement.

Waterboarding these assorted pieces of Islamist trash who want the religious ecstasy of slitting your throat and throwing your daughter down a well is being far nicer than these miscreants deserve. Sorry, but reality is a bitch.

Keep shedding tears for the enemies of civilization, though. Keep pretending what they do is the same thing as "what we do." You're pathetic.

Grow a spine, and  knock off your lame attempts at moral equivalence. Its so 1960's.

Posted by: Good Lt at June 02, 2007 01:30 PM (yMbfY)

6 Did anyone else notice that in ALL of the pictures the man being tortured has a full beard and the person DOING the torture has a clean chin ?
All of the photos I have seen of al Queda always show bearded men. Gee........ maybe this was a manual showing what might happen to al Queda people.

Posted by: John Ryan at June 02, 2007 02:50 PM (TcoRJ)

7 Good Lt.
 
Please be it known that I expect our side to set an example as we did in WWII and not become barbaric ourselves.  We are better than that.
 
 

Posted by: Bo at June 02, 2007 10:02 PM (euN4c)

8 Tourture for them listen to one of BILL CLINTONS speeches it would drive em nuts

Posted by: sandpiper at June 03, 2007 12:43 AM (XnXsx)

9

"The effects of isolation, anxiety, fatigue, lack of sleep, uncomfortable temperatures, and chronic hunger produce disturbances of mood, attitudes and behavior in nearly all prisoners. The living organism cannot entirely withstand such assaults. The Republicans Communists do not look upon these assaults as 'torture.' But all of them produce great discomfort, and lead to serious disturbances of many bodily processes; there is no reason to differentiate them from any other form of torture...


The CIA KGB hardly ever uses manacles or chains, and rarely resorts to physical beatings. The actual physical beating is, of course, repugnant to overt Republican Communist principles and is contrary to C.I.A. K.G.B. regulations...


Prisoners are tried before "military tribunals," which are not public courts. Those present are only the interrogator, the state prosecutor, the prisoner, the judges, a few stenographers, and perhaps a few officers of the court...


In typical Republican Communist legalistic fashion, the O.L.C. N.K.V.D. rationalized its use of torture and pressure in the interrogation of prisoners of war. When it desired to use such methods against a prisoner or to obtain from him a propaganda statement or 'confession,' it simply declared the prisoner an enemy combatant a "war-crimes suspect" and informed him that, therefore, he was not subject to international rules governing the treatment of prisoners of war," - "Communist Interrogation," The Annals of Neurology and Psychology, 1956.
 
You may hold your head up high and proud that America is now behaving like the Bolshevics, but I'm not.

Posted by: Bo at June 03, 2007 01:36 PM (euN4c)

10 Good Lt.
 
I don't excuse THEM for what they do.  I question why we support torture?  What does it actually accomplish?  Intelligence obtained via torture is useless anyway - according to many experts.
 
And Dresden was a war crime - but we digress.

Posted by: Bo at June 03, 2007 01:40 PM (euN4c)

11 Bo: what's the difference between spanking a misbehaving child and "torture." None, according to you. After all, both "produce disturbances of mood, attitudes and behavior..."

 Why don't you just run along and find another nice, warm jihadi cock to stick in your mouth?


Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at June 03, 2007 03:51 PM (q6AiT)

12 Bluto,
 
Comparing terrorists to misbehaved childred - that's a new one for me.  LOL!!

Posted by: Bo at June 03, 2007 08:23 PM (euN4c)

13 Bo: You are so ignorant of people that you fail to see the difference between the Germans and Islamics. Setting the Jewish thing aside. Allied prisoners of war had a low incidence of death while in POW camps. Far less than in the Japanese POW camps. Where Americans were tortured. RELIGOUS FANATICS. are not people. You are obviouly a non realist pie-in-the- sky little shit. Sticking your head up your ass will not help a pityful little nerd like yourself. You would like the taste. Now back to your bathhouse perhaps a few more dicks in Bo will create some common sense. Something you are totally devoid of.

Posted by: greyrooster at June 04, 2007 11:56 AM (+N3be)

14 Greyrooster,
 
Look - a smear does not effectively replace logic - and your post contains none of the latter.
 
You cannot win a protracted militarily engagement against fanatical muslims in a foreign land where you have zero intelligence and over 90% of the population sees you as an occupier.  Why is this such a hard thing for you to understand?  Do you want American forces and the treasury bled dry swatting flies?  Are you an Islamic agent here to ensure they have a continuous supply of American meat?
 
The first step in your de-brainwashing has to be to accept that there are limitation to American firepower and influence.  Start from there and proceed to step 2:  how to disengage from the influence of our own religious fanatics and the control of foreign lobbyists (like AIPAC) and you will be on your way to being cured of this terrible affliction that has a hold on you.
 
The "realists" are not in your camp by the way (nice try though).

Posted by: Bo at June 04, 2007 01:00 PM (Ywo+X)

15 Very simple dork. I am not for doing anything but punishing muslims severely for every transgression against the west. A people are responsible for the government and a country is responsible for the actions of the citizens. We don't need intelligence. We know who supports the terrorists, who cheers for them, who hides them and who breeds them. The best way to handle Islamics is to destroy their countries infracture every time an American is attacked. In time they will either police their own or spend their time gathering camel dung to cook on. Doesn't matter to me. We must speak to them in a language they understand. That language is violence in return for violence. WE CARE TOO MUCH. Islam will always be at war with others. It's the nature of the thing. OUTLAW ISLAM. 

Posted by: greyrooster at June 05, 2007 01:30 AM (1h1Tb)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
40kb generated in CPU 0.2137, elapsed 0.4903 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.2492 seconds, 170 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.