And what, exactly, is the crime of legally owning a gun, Matt Westerhold?

Can't seem to think of one, but the staff of this newspaper sees a "crime" being committed.

I see an invasion of privacy, a class-action lawsuit and customer backlash, but that's just me.

Also interesting how the moronic editor cites a "right to know," as if legal gun owners are comparable to child molesters/sexual predators.

Note to Democrat activists journalists of the world: In addition to the 1st Amendment, there is also a 2nd Amendment in that Constitution that you claim to have read. We know these registries are a matter of public record. The problem, of course, is discretion. As Jeff Goldblum said in Jurassic Park, they were so obsessed with the idea that they could that they never stopped to think if they should. And in this case, what is the urgency and public interest served in "outing" private citizens who aren't breaking any laws?

I'm sure they'd give the same kind of treatment to law-breaking illegal aliens if they knew where they were working and living. These journalists are 'patriots.'

If you want to call Sandusky Register editor Matt Westerhold and let them know how you feel about their assault on the privacy and safety of legal gun owners, fell free.

Matt Westerhold
419-609-5866
mattwesterhold@sanduskyregister.com

Doug Phares, Publisher
419-609-5860
dougphares@sanduskyregister.com

This is a blatant abuse of what newspapers claim to do, and it is unfortunately all too common in the leftwing press. First they came for the gun owners - who knows what legal, law-abiding citizens they'll come after next.

ht: Michelle Malkin

Posted by: Good Lt. at 11:06 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 274 words, total size 2 kb.